Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Putin WARNED him this would happen, he didn't bluff | Redacted with Clayton Morris" video.

  1. He didn't need to invade Ukraine though.
    5
  2.  @ZozoZoz-qh1ku  Whatever they would do. They would have no right to invade Mexico. It doesn't matter if they don't like it. If they invaded Mexico under those circustances, USA would be in the wrong. No excuses are acceptable.
    2
  3.  @hansniessen8976  Britain already left EU, what are you on about? Also they are worse now than they were if they were part of EU.
    2
  4.  @jhsar1375  Exactly, and isn't theirs, unless Ukraine says so.
    2
  5. Like all politicians, he lies when he needs to.
    2
  6.  @dainaandreetto510  The fact that Putin was caught lying quite a few times. There is no such thing as a politician that never lies.
    2
  7.  @dvegule920  Doesn't matter. How he speaks doesn't change what he does. And yet Zelensky is merely defending his nation against invasion. So whetever he speaks nonsense or not, I prefer his actions over Putin's actions.
    2
  8.  @clthornsbury4192  He's one of the bad guys. Even if Zelensky is one, that doesn't excuse Putin's own actions.
    2
  9.  @stevenginn5352  What was? Lying before, means he still lied and is capable of doing so again.
    2
  10. No matter what Putin does. We Europeans will stand against him.
    1
  11. We could, if we had the means to force Russia out of Ukraine through justifiable means.
    1
  12.  @robbiewizz658  Yes, I did. I already did my research long ago on the matter. The regime change in Ukraine was justified. And how does USA's wrongs justifiy Russia's wrongs?
    1
  13.  @goosygoosy5883  My take is quite simple. The ethnic cleansing is a lie. If Ukraine wanted to cleanse all Russian speaking population, why only Donbas regions are targeted? There are no shortage of Russian speakers on the center and western parts of Ukraine as well, so why only those specific regions are attacked? Simple, because only Donbas regions have rebelled and created separatist groups. The attacks are retaliation against Donbas causing a civil war. Your "friends" mean nothing to me, because they could easily be lies. Why would I believe your word over mine? Simple, by removing by force all separatists from the region and sending them packing to Russia, where they belong. Russia should have helped Ukraine supress them and send them outside of Ukranian territory into Russia.
    1
  14.  @totobibi507  But not by meddling. Except Ukraine didn't threat Russia's population. Ukranian citizens belong to Ukraine, and Donbas is part of Ukraine. Bad comparison. Individuals can't be compared to countries. You don't start a war just to save one person, or even many of them. And specially not to save people who don't deserve to be saved.
    1
  15.  @thiscocks  Hardly. Ukranian people wanted Viktor ousted. Russia has been pulling strings with Viktor in power. They instigated the separatists to rebel and armed them. Russia started hostilities against Ukraine as a result.
    1
  16.  @vmax4steve524  Doesn't matter. 500 year ago is pretty much history. It doesn't matter what the name means, Ukraine was been a independant nation since 1991. Well, we can't trust Putin either. So the feeling is mutual. Putin is a liar too, so he will feel right at home. Also, learn to make spaces.
    1
  17.  @lozah9036  They aren't Republics. No invasion took place. One can't invade their own territory. Only Russia recognizes them as such. UN doesn't recognize them either. Otherwise Guterres wouldn't be opposed to Russia's agression. They aren't nations, and thus article 51 doesn't apply. They are property of Ukraine whetever Russia agrees or not.
    1
  18. Doesn't matter. Provocation is no valid reason to invade.
    1
  19.  @Marcel-ct9wq  Unless that provocation is in the form of invasion, no provocation is valid to invade another country. And like I said multiple times to many people who said the same thing you said in the previous post. USA would have no right to invade in a similiar situation. USA was wrong to invade Iraq and other similiar countries.
    1
  20.  @julia.mcconnell  Historic land means it's no longer theirs.
    1
  21.  @cindybogart6062  I don't believe it either. But make no mistake, some clergyman like Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church approve of war.
    1
  22.  @MelaninMagdalene  Indeed. But for that to happen, Russia must leave Ukraine.
    1
  23. Nobody has the right to use nukes no matter the reason. Only a fool or someone who doesn't care about human life would attack another country and cause even more war.
    1
  24. You can't believe in any leader, much less an invader.
    1
  25. That's Putin. Imagine fearing Ukraine or invasion by other countries.
    1
  26.  filippalund TARTARIA an Empire hidden in history  No thanks. EU should stay.
    1
  27. Putin fanaticism at it's finest.
    1
  28. The onlt lessons we are learning is Putin can't be trusted and that he invaded a country.
    1
  29.  @BillBarr-if6fi  He did invade though. Bakhmut is Ukranian territory.
    1
  30.  @BillBarr-if6fi  My bad then. Some people actually believe that Russia never invaded Ukraine, because they don't consider east Ukraine to be part of Ukraine, so I thought you might be one of those people. My apologies.
    1
  31.  @Desmondbrown73  Careful what you wish for.
    1
  32.  @KkevrockK  Thanks for what? They would have gladly let us all die if Germany hadn't betrayed them. I have no thanks to give for them invading Germany in self defense after they attempted to invade Russia.
    1
  33.  @rondamoringa4267  Except any people living in Ukraine are Ukranian citizens. They are none of Russia's bussiness. And worse of all, they are protecting criminals.
    1
  34. You mean like respecting Ukraine's borders? Oh wait...
    1
  35.  @frankparker9319  And why do I care what Herbie Bush promised? I'm not american. Also, Herbie Bush is no longer in power. So his promise is just air once another president takes over with different ideologies.
    1
  36.  @CosmonautAstronaut  And why would they after what Russia did to Ukraine in 2014? Ukraine shouldn't respect any requests coming from an hostile nation.
    1
  37.  @fightback397  That was USA's doing, not Ukraine. Russia is the one that invaded Georgia to begin with. As they should, if they want to be part of NATO, they should partake on their operations. NATO would respect borders' if they werent' a threat. Either way, it wasn't Ukraine that started those conflicts. Since Russia started this conflict in 2014, that makes it Russia's fault.
    1
  38.  @marqicewalker1766  Precisely, which is why Russia is in the wrong. What USA does wrong, doesn't justify Russia's own wrongs.
    1
  39.  @marqicewalker1766  Yes, I know. It means that one doing a wrong to correct a wrong, doesn't make it right.
    1
  40. There can be no opportunities for peace while Russia is in Ukraine.
    1
  41.  @leviwallace9647  Spare me the childish attitude. You gain nothing with it. By having both sides talk with each other. And for that to happen, Russia must stop attacks against Ukraine first, by means of a cease fire. Zelensky already said that he is willing to engage in peace talks, but will only do so if Russia stops their invasion first.
    1