General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Diogo Jorge
Redacted
comments
Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "EXCLUSIVE! Captured Ukrainian Soldiers Speak Out, Forced to Take Drugs To Fight | Redacted News" video.
@jtkrpm1 No, it's mostly Russia. No invasion of Ukraine, no war. Whoever invades first, starts the conflict.
3
@gregscrabshack2307 Russia wasn't backed in a corner. Russia has nukes and wasn't invaded either.
3
@racing_mntage1584 Yes. USA is to blame for any invasions, if their country wasn't attacked first.
3
@Ridethebomb777 I know though. About how Ukraine used to be part of the USRR and the events that led to Ukraine becoming independent in 1991. History doesn't justify invasion, btw.
3
And it's Russia's fault, ever since 2014.
2
@angryralphs2516 I already heard about her many times before. No matter her opinions on EU or Ukraine, Ukraine is the one being invaded.
2
@angryralphs2516 And that matters why? Ukraine became independent in 1991, meaning it's no longer Russia's bussinesses. Should Spain also get a say on everything Portugal does as well?
2
@silverbullet2008bb That's Russia's goal.
2
@cw6644 There was no agression against Russia. NATO didn't attack Russia.
2
@User-nw37 Afraid not. That was ages ago and thus not relevant to current times. USA was going to invade Cuba, not Russia. Either way, USA would be in the wrong for invading Cuba if they went through with it.
2
@kiriakosstoupakis338 I'm right, you mean.
2
@kiriakosstoupakis338 Wrong. Thanks to Russia.
2
@jtkrpm1 Never said it wasn't. However, for determining who starts a war, that comes all down to who attacked first.
2
@jtkrpm1 Russia wasn't being attacked before they invaded Ukraine.
2
It's not that simple. It would take months to do so, unfortunately, Putin in his paranoia decided to attack right after. Making it impossible for them to join.
2
If Russia hadn't invaded, there would be no "cruel experiment" which by the way is more Russian propaganda.
1
Doubt everything. Specially narratives from PoW's which could have easily been bought to say whatever.
1
So, for all we know, it's not even a POW, but just a pretender.
1
I mean, they were captured by Russians. They could have easily been tortured to say whatever Putin wants them to say.
1
Lies instilled on them by Russians. Why should we believe the words of captured Ukranian soldiers? The only ones doing the capturing of Ukranian soldiers would be the Russians.
1
@lewisphillips7223 Who instigated Donbas separatists? Who planted a Russian puppet as the president of Ukraine before 2014? Those historical "facts" of yours are wrong.
1
@angryralphs2516 And Soviet book is wrong. Those "children" should be punished for causing a civil war and they aren't theirs to begin with.
1
@silverbullet2008bb And so is Putin. He too was a member. Either way, Putin is the greater threat here.
1
@Lu-MingPan-b5w Russia is the one who invaded. So the fault lies with Russia.
1
@andyman8630 They stopped being so when USRR fell and Ukraine became independent. Most of those are Ukranian territory, and Crimea is the only one that could qualify as Russian territory. Even then it was stolen from Ukraine. Yes, it should stand idle. Far better result than having even more deaths resulting from the conflict. Most of those are hardly innocent. 10k were separatists, only 4k were civilians, which were killed by both Ukranian and Russian backed separatists in the crossfire between the two forces. The Minsk agreement is worthless at this point and should be ignored. It didn't separatists from killing pro-Ukranians, so why bother respect it? The UN seems to disagree with you, considering they are on Ukraine's side.
1
@be1 Never said they were, so... Explain how US's wrongs justify Russia's wrongs. I will shut up when I see fit. Nobody gets to tell me what to do.
1
@tavytube1 It doesn't matter. Invasion is wrong, with or whitout resources. And? Once again, what does USA's wrongs have to do with Russia's wrongs? Neither justifies the other.
1
@be1 Doesn't matter. Had USA invaded Cuba, USA would have been in the wrong, no matter what excuses they would make. Just like Russia is in the wrong here. And what's wrong with that? Russia has nukes near Ukraine, why is Ukraine not allowed to have missiles to defend itself with?
1
@andredel.8302 I'm neither. Just because I don't agree with you, doesn't make me a troll.
1
@estoyaqui5386 You mean completely right. It doesn't matter what he argued or didn't argued. That's for Ukraine to decide, not Russia. That's the lie he sold. He backed Donbas separatists by arming them, and instigating them.
1
@belladonna6624 I already know virtually everything on the matter. I did research on both sides. I'm already sure of what I'm saying. It is paranoia to think that anyone had plans to invade Russia.
1
@splinterinthemind5158 All meaningless. Misnk accords weren't respected by the separatists, so why should Ukraine? The coup was justified. The Ukranian people wanted Viktor, the Russian puppet out. Nazis are the propaganda that Russia tries to sell to justify the unjustifiable. Even if there were nazis, it wouldn't justify invasion. Just as there is no justification to invade North Korea, no matter how evil their government is. The only time one can justify invasion, is when one is invaded first, and thus can retaliate and invade in return. "Game station" or no, I did my research from both sides. My conclusion is the same, no matter how many times I ponder about it. Russia is to blame.
1
@crystalyoung8389 I already looked them up many times, and I think they are worthless. Russia tried for a worthless peace, that would require for Ukraine to let separatists steal their land unopposed while kidnapping and killing pro-Ukranians. It started in 2014 with Russia's meddling. They are fightning against separatists. You should do your research, if you honestly believe that this is about ethnics. If Ukraine's goal was to kill ethnic Russians, they could have easily burned Donbas to the ground in a year.
1
@greentea0302 Russia is the one that invaded Ukraine. That makes them the enemy.
1
@xomox5316 Former citizens, means they are no longer citizens of Russia. No, that's called paranoia. The Nazis are hardly a threat, and fightning separatists is justified. Even if that was the case, that's no valid reason to invade and start a war, and get even more people killed.
1
@charmainemorales3799 From both sides, while reaching my own conclusions. No, he isn't? Putin is the one who brought his nonsensical security concerns.
1
@tatfly5779 It was the other way around. Separatists were the first to attack Pro-Ukraine. Those cases are fabrications by Russia. Ukraine never invaded Russia.
1
@tatfly5779 Afraid not. My research led to this conclusion, and I'm right. More Russian propaganda.
1
@vob8509 I have more than plenty of idea. Doesn't matter. Those are still outside of Russian territory. For the defense of Ukraine in case of Russian invasion. Can you prove otherwise? If there's no invasion of Russia, you can't prove it.
1
@vob8509 My sources are way too numerous to list. I will simply tell the ones from both sides that I usually see the most. Redacted from the Russian supporting side, and José Milhazes, from the opposing side, an well known Portuguese journalist whom is well informed about Russian matters. Also, those so called analysts forget that Russia did invade Ukraine. No matter what excuses they make for Russia, that's wrong and can't be excused. Nothing justifies invasion of another country, save if Russia had been invaded first. Only then would Russia would have the right to invade Ukraine in retaliation.
1
Won't happen as long Russia doesn't leave Ukraine and drops the unreasonable demands.
1
@PrettyGoodLookin We will see about that. Negotiations require the invader to cease fire at the very least. Yes, it does.
1
Then Putin should stop his invasion.
1