Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "\"Putin has no choice left but to fight NATO\" now that Ukraine is out of men | Redacted News" video.

Nice way of saying "Zelensky should be in the frontlines, but not Putin."
2
Drafting is normal during war time. Russia does it, USA does it.
2
Whetever they can or not. They must defend themselves no matter the result.
2
Why wouldn't he? Russia wasn't attacked. Russia should have left Ukraine alone, what happens in Ukraine's side of the border doesn't justify invasion.
2
@soreeyez They caused problems first. Also, NATO's wrongs or not wrongs don't justify Russia's own wrongs.
2
As if they were ever at risk. Russia could have left Ukraine alone and nothing of signficance would have happened.
2
Why Putin doesn't go to the front line, if that's so important?
1
Ukraine asked them. EU is also an ally of Ukraine.
1
@larsnystrom6698 There wouldn't be any war if Russia didn't act.
1
@davidisaacson9328 Putin too. It was a waste of resources and lives to invade Ukraine.
1
@dongoble1792 To defend their land, which Russia attacked.
1
You mean mostly Ukraine. NATO only sent a sliver of their strength in the form of mercenaries.
1
@RickBlaine How do you know it is all of their ammunition? DId you count and know their entire stockpile? They only sent a fraction of what they have most likely. PS I fail to see how is that our problem, in the middle of war, some promises might become impossible to acomplish. Not really, Finland joined NATO, so it helped NATO recruitment. Couldn't care less about them. All I care about is Russia is punished for it's sins and Ukraine defended as much as it takes.
1
@RickBlaine Far smaller than Russia's sins. Those could have been manipulated to say so. NATO is still providing ammo even now and it wasn't the first time it was said that they had no ammo. Many months ago the same lie was said. Sorry, but I don't trust your sources either, I do my own research. Don't be fooled by Russian apologists propaganda.
1
@RickBlaine They are insignifanct compared to Russia's sins. That doesn't mean it's empty, it only means they spent enough to take that long to makes it full again. NATO's weaponry storages would take more than a decade to fill up, not some years. And that's assuming those were actually members of NATO and not just pretenders to stage fake news. I research from both sides, and unlike you I don't buy Russian propaganda. So sorry.
1
@RickBlaine I feel little, they are nothing compared to Russia's I researched from both sides, my conclusion is that Russia shouldn't have attacked Ukraine, no matter the reason. That's only normal. If they had it truely depleted, it would take more than a decade, not just years. NATO is still sending gear even now after 6 days of your post.
1
We will see about that.
1
@davidisaacson9328 Nope. We will.
1
@chronicillz1879 Afraid my name isn't Johny. It's not though. Ukraine still fights.
1
@chronicillz1879 What are you talking about? Defeating Russia? Never. The goal isn't to defeat Russia though.
1
Satan doesn't exist.
1
Why wouldn't he?
1
@HappyBloke81 More like they lack the means to kill Zelensky.
1
@MementoMeSmori I don't have anything to get over. Those don't matter, if their weapons don't reach the target. Some of those would be intercepted. Also, they don't know where Zelensky is. Firing missiles haphzardly whitout knowing where your target is, is dumb.
1
@MementoMeSmori As I said "some", not all of them would be hypersonic, there's only so many they can shoot. KGB can't pinpoint every location that Zelensky is at. They aren't omniscient, you give them too much credit. And still not enough to find Zelensky. He's never in one place for too long. Not only that, but any attack against him in a foreign country would be an act of war against said country.
1
Then stay out of the comments section.
1
@elonthun8012 Emojis. The last resort of those who have no counterargument. I will accept your admittance of defeat.
1
@Lyon.Gaultier Whetever they can win or not, they have to defend themselves all the same.
1
@donzell1945 Separatists you mean. There wouldn't be any innocent deaths if they hadn't caused a civil war. Also, It's up to Ukraine to decide what to do in Donbas, not Russia. It's property of Ukraine. On top of that, because Russia acted, there will be even more deaths from boths sides. If they had done nothing, less people would have to die.
1
@soreeyez Nope. Also, Putin supporters are the real (Orcs). :) Loved how you slithered away from answering to the last part, that one's wrongs don't justify Russia's.
1
@soreeyez Whatever you say Putin(Orc) apologist.
1
@perjanuschas8050 Doesn't matter. USA would be in the wrong if they invaded Canada or Mexico. Nothing justifies invasion save if one's country is invaded first.
1
@perjanuschas8050 Doesn't matter. Invading another country is wrong. Invasion of Canada or Mexico by USA would be wrong, no matter what they think.
1
@perjanuschas8050 Doesn't matter what they did or didn't tell. No they didn't. There was no proof that they were going to be attacked, and even if there was, to attack first, it's to be responsible for the creation of war. That's unforgivable. Once again, it doesn't matter what US would have done, because if they did the same, they would be in the wrong. No excuses are acceptable for invasion of another country. I understand all too well that is wrong to invade other countries, no matter the reason.
1
@joanndeck4315 Yes, USA should have left Cuba be back in the day, instead of making a fuss. There's no difference, USA and Russia were wrong in each case respectively.
1
@johnbodman4504 That's Russian propaganda. It was never about ethnicity. Those are separatists. It was been happening for more than 8 years, are you telling me Ukraine is so lazy that it can't kill more than some 14k "ethnic Russians" over that period of time? Israel killed far more palestinians in less than a year. They shouldn't have intervened. They made things worse for everyone.
1