Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on ""This is an incredibly DANGEROUS moment" Putin activates nuclear arsenal to highest level | Redacted" video.

@ke8mattj Can that be even be considered strength? If you destroy everything, then you gain nothing. There's more to strength than destructive power.
13
If he was truely patient, he wouldn't have invaded Ukraine in the first place.
7
You wish. Whetever happens to Ukraine, it won't harm NATO in the long run.
6
@mosessupposes2571 No, it won't. Finland is better off in NATO as it provides better chances should Russia invade, than if they were on their own.
4
Lol, west didn't do any agression against Russia. Also, using nukes is as imoral one can go.
3
@TheMellow85 Yes? As long it is outside of Russian territory. Doesn't matter what USA would be okay with or not. USA would have no right to invade Mexico under those circustances. Exactly, and it's precisely because they were used at all, that we know that they should never be used, no matter the reason.
3
@ArtisChronicles You mean right. Hardly. NATO barely suffered in this conflict. And unless Putin somehow forgets his brains, he knows that attacking NATO is suicide for Russia.
3
@richardyatesyates3893 I mean, the burden of proof lies with the ones making the claim.
2
@vortex162 Doesn't matter how patient he was. He should never invaded no matter the reason. Nobody is worth starting a war over.
2
Makes no sense to me. How petty must one be to raise nuclear readiness over a mere assassination attempt?
2
@vaska1999 Then Stoltenberg doesn't know what he's talking about. Let them lie all they want, they are wrong.
2
@76verdee Then why did they join? Also, Russia wasn't being threatened by anyone either. I disagree. Russia and NK exist, as long they do, we always will need NATO.
2
@lukast02 Pretty much. Nobody knows and nobody has proof that is the case.
2
Can't learn, if one never lived it. People die and are replaced by the younger who weren't even born then, that's how it works, and why it's difficult to have past lessons to stick after so many decades.
1
Then he should target himself.
1
Had Russia not invaded Ukraine... nobody would target Putin.
1
The previous administration of yours would have licked Putin's boots instead.
1
No longer valid. That was years ago. Ukraine has the right to change their mind after Russia's stealing of their land and instigating separatists.
1
Who cares? Readying nukes over an assassination attempt, or even a sucessful one is a overreaction. USA didn't use nukes when Kennedy was assassinated, now did they? And they are the most reckless.
1
@aoisora1445 And now we have even more deaths than the people they would save, and they don't even deserve to be saved in the first place. They started a civil war and Russia instigated them. It doesn't matter what Russia's reason is, invasion is wrong, no matter the reason. It can only be justified if Ukraine had invaded Russia first, but since they didn't, Russia's reasons are nothing but air. No person on this planet, no matter how numerous or important, is worth starting a war over. All wars should always be avoided.
1
@MrS22222 And all Russia's fault for instigating separatist scum. Ukraine isn't Russia, and the majority of Ukraine wanted that coup.
1
@KittyMusicClub Biolabs exist everywhere, not just Ukraine. As long they are whitin Ukraine borders, Ukraine can do whatever with them. And before you say it. Russia has yet to prove that there are any weapons in them.
1
There's no real action to be taken. Had Putin died, I would have cheered it. No use pretending otherwise for me.
1
Invading Ukraine isn't the best way to do it.
1
@keefbeef2002 You think this is a laughing matter? One should never use nukes, even as a last resort. Only self-centered people would make such a fuss over someone trying to assassinate them.
1
@kylestevenson5911 Irony aside, that would have been an even worse reason. Using nukes over a single person is epitome of ridiculous. Let alone the fact that using nukes at all is imoral.
1
@almontgomery4095 Couldn't care less about it. We don't need it.
1
@thiernobalde939 And NATO didn't attack Russia, so...
1
@benjaminclement8437 That's what you believe, based on the lies they feed you. I know virtually everything on the matter. NATO is more than just Europe, and Europe already has three powerful militaries. If you are so confident, then why wasn't Russia attacked NATO yet? Because Russia knows they can't handle all of those countries at once.
1
@idaerasmus9617 People easily influenced by delusions of grandeur, most likely. It's easy to put someone on a pedestal. Far harder to give the truth to the lie. Putin is not a saviour, just another rotten politician.
1
@zlatoya69 Rebel against whom though? I know If that happens, the ones who will face my wrath will be any Putin supporters.
1