Comments by "Edward Bernayse666" (@edwardbernayse6665) on "Selfies And Joy In Iran Over Nuclear Deal" video.

  1. Nunya Bidness or iran could actually decide to at least give up on trying to build nuclear weapons and deem that as futile and counter-productive to their survival and prosperity as a country. time will tell.
    2
  2. Jeffrey Harrison what i think he means and what i think is that their are congressmen ans senators who have deals made with defense contractors and zionist lobbyist groups who would financially "suffer" if their was peace made with iran.  in order for them to profit, the usa needs enemies to sell to the american people in order to get the president to sign more bills giving more tax payer money to these groups and making them richer and more powerful.  they are a minority but that doesn't matter with the kind of money that they have.  they have already brainwashed a lot of americans with a lot of paranoia and fear of iran.  i would expect there to be a real fight in congress and the senate over passing this deal.
    2
  3. ***** its a response to all of the bullshit that ignorant iranian hating retards have been saying. do you think that these guys don't read the comment boards? i'm glad that they took those not so subtle jabs at you all. you all had it coming.
    1
  4. ***** i think that they banned it a few years ago when iranians were protesting the rigged re-election of ahmadijhad and were recording what was going on with their cell phones and putting it on twitter. whether or not it is still banned, i don't know, probably.
    1
  5. James Parker i think that he is iranian. as far as whether or not twitter is legal in iran? idk.
    1
  6. ***** i remember him.  he said that he fought in the iran-iraq war from 87-90 and believes in the 13th imam coming to usher in peace but first iran is supposed to go to war with saudi arabia which he is really excited about happening.  he also was talking with an american iraq war veteran about who killed more baathists during the respective wars.
    1
  7. JamanWerSonst i would still be watching out for dirty tricks on their end though.
    1
  8. Mohammad Reza i don't think that most politicians in DC or the hard liners in iran actually want an all out war with each other but i think that the politicians on both sides find it personally advantageous to have each other as enemies.  unfortunately, they can point at each other and call each other threats and this helps them get more support overall.  most iranians might really hate khamenei and the hardliners but they will be less inclined to topple the mullah regime so long as they fear foreign threats.  like i said, it's all domestic psy-ops. khamenei says offensive things about the usa and the politicians here use that to maintain more support from the citizens and they say something "tough" right back and iranians continue to see the usa as a real threat and the game continues on and the people in both countries can't figure out the game that is being played and how they are being manipulated.
    1
  9. UTubeHobby he could just relax and be glad that iran won't have nukes as he feared.
    1
  10. UTubeHobby how do you know that?
    1
  11. UTubeHobby well i hope that hal lindsey is wrong on that one.  if netanyahu called that shot then the whole world will be pissed off at israel for that (except for neo-conservative republicans here and most of those in saudi leadership positions and a few radical clerics there).
    1
  12. UTubeHobby did the report say the reasons why israel hit the depot in libya?  libya has always left israel alone and has always had their own agenda separate from the israeli-palestenian conflict. 
    1
  13. UTubeHobby that doesn't make much sense.  iran wouldn't consciously sell weapons to groups like that.  they sell them to hamas and hezbollah but ISIS and these terrorist groups in libya are their enemies.  what is the name of this israeli newspaper?  i suspect some intentional misinformation going on there.
    1
  14. UTubeHobby no problem.
    1
  15. ***** what do you think about this deal?
    1
  16. ***** now this deal has to be passed in the senate and in congress.  republicans hint as though they are dead set against the deal.  i think that they reasons are monetary and not practical.  these guys get the most "donor money" from defense contractors and zionist lobbyist groups who stand to profit from their being a conflict with iran.  peace with them would in theory mean less tax payer money going to the defense contractors and less money going to israel.  anyways that's the corruption angle on the right.
    1