Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Nightmare Scenario if Ukraine is Abandoned by the West" video.

  1. 3
  2.  @A_Derpy_NINJA  Absolutely agreed and supported. I believe that all your points are valid. I am at a loss as to the reason that more people do not recognise those issues. Re your comment beginning "first of all that(s) not a given that Ukraine could have found a work around." The last point carries the most weight, I think. "They got a good deal at a time when WE all thought a new Russia was being born." Ukraine had been assured that it would be safe from attack, invasion and WAR waged against them. While, at the time, they had some misgivings about relinquishing the nuclear weapons, it seemed, on balance, the reasonable thing to do, both from national and international perspectives. If Ukraine had retained the nuclear weapons, they would also have increased the possibility of being attacked with nuclear weapons. Russia's unprovoked WAR against Ukraine, commenced in 2014, demonstrates that possibility and high probability. I think that most people are not aware that Ukraine also relinquished to Russia, on the basis of promises made by Russia, most of their military hardware. That included all the Tu-95 heavy bombers. Much, if not all of this hardware has been used against Ukraine since Russia's insurgency, invasion, incitement to insurrection and WAR waged by Russia against Ukraine, since 2014. As a result of the transfer of Ukraine's military hardware to Russia, and despite Russia's claim to "need to demilitarise Ukraine", the Russian political and military establishment and Putin, in particular, as the signatory to the agreements, knew that Ukraine had, between 1991 and 1997, been militarily emasculated or neutered. Not only did Ukraine have no wish to attack Russia, but they could not do so, without being aware that Ukraine would simply bring great harm on themselves. 🇺🇦 Victory for Ukraine, Absolute Victory 🇺🇦
    2