Comments by "Jammy Dodger" (@JammyDodger45) on "Sad Day As Sentry Aircraft Comes Home For Retirement" video.

She said 'the UK has undertook', as such she is correct. A singular entity such as a kingdom can't act in the multiple form as defined by undertaken.
2
@jej3451 - 'a singular entity' has nothing to do with pluralisation it means a union of organisations i.e. the UK is a s.e. formed by multiple countries.
1
@jej3451 - cite you a rule for a singular entity? It's a title for a type of organisation, like, for example, a Trade Union, a s.e. representing the welfare of its multitude of members. I don't know which rule is appropriate for your level of ignorance 🤷🏻‍♂️.
1
@jej3451 - it is a past participle, of an irregular verb, which as I'm sure you know can act as an adjective modifier to a noun. I'm more than happy to educate you, my billing rate is £140ph, just tell me where to send the invoice.
1
@jej3451 - you're a perfect example of how "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
1
@archerry6457 - I'm not. I had.
1
It doesn't sound quite as dumb as you. The "so called" aspect relates only to the 'state' part of Islamic State as no such autonomous area exists, it was occupied territory of existing sovereign states such as Syria, Iraq & Kurdistan. "Just Saying" 🙄
1
@MrShadowfax42 - it's got nothing at all to do with not offending Muslims, how is saying 'so called' a sop to Islam? Your point makes literally no sense. Other terrorist organisations weren't referred to as 'so-called' because they weren't claiming statehood. If that's too complex for you then you're beyond my help.
1
@MrShadowfax42 - when Cameron was PM the Govt were referring to ISIS & ISIL, a MP complained that this legitimised the terrorists and so the Govt sought another official term. This is where Deash comes from, it's Arabic description is as you say BUT when pronouncing Arabic vowels using a 'hard' or 'soft' pronunciation changes the whole word (unlike in English). Detractors of Daesh use a hard E which makes the term derogatory, there isn't a direct English comparison but it sort of means person who tramples all others (irrespective of their faith/nationality/beliefs) which in Islam is a terrible thing to be. As many English speakers in the media and Govt etc couldn't get this right it sounded like they were supporting and legitimising Daesh. So the BBC decided to go back to IS but with the modifier 'so called' to indicate the illegitimacy of the claims. These Govt activities are recorded in Hansard and can be looked up by anyone. The BBC statement is out there too if you want to search for it. But given that you can't Google what sop means I don't imagine that's going to happen. I have served in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria throughout my 24yr military career so trust me when I say I have no sympathy for these people no matter what title is used but their beliefs are not about religion, they're about hate and they dress them up as a religious system so that foolish people believe they have a just cause.
1
She said 'the UK undertook' as such she is correct. A singular entity such as a kingdom can't act in the multiple form defined by undertaken.
1
@jej3451 - since you've just tried to 'correct' me on another thread and failed miserably I'm going to disregard your comment because once again you're utterly incorrect. But I like your consistency, 2 posts, both wrong.
1
@jej3451 - undertook is the past tense. Undertaken is the past participle. It's not difficult (although it seems to be for you). Hope That Helps (again).
1