Youtube comments of Alex (@Alex-cw3rz).
-
17000
-
3100
-
3000
-
1500
-
1000
-
996
-
978
-
971
-
965
-
934
-
864
-
831
-
785
-
720
-
700
-
659
-
634
-
627
-
620
-
596
-
As someone born in Bolton. The main issues stem from the fact Bolton's town centre is larger by area than Cardiffs yets population is half and metro area is 1/5th. You have Manchester, Middlebrook and the Trafford Centre which is huge competition. The next issue is that the town centre has very few people living in and around it, whereas 100 years ago 10,000s of people lived in it, now its a few hundred, because most houses were demolished. Since 2010 bus frequency has dropped meaning less people use the town (Trams were got rid of in 1949 before then it had a huge extensive tram network as well). And as with most place we were punished for the bankers in London and the US for the 2008 recession, therefore people have less money, less support and there is less investment in the area. The question of is it beyond repair, the answer is no. It needs a decent amount of redevelopment (which is actually underway Crompton Place for example is to have 250 million pound development), in fill projects on brown field sites would increase the useage of the high street and more grants for local businesses would help. In general for all high streets to stem the decline of the high street Business rate Scrapping / reform would do that in an instant that would reduce costs on average by about 15%, which would open new businesses and releave pressure on most businesses and make them much more competitive with online businesses. An example of how more people within walking distance is very useful is the market as you said it's full of people and full of businesses, well that's because it's right on the edge of town next to one of the most densely populated part of the town, whereas the end of Bradshawgate where it was just boardup and shuttered shops has hardly anyone living within walking distance.
583
-
568
-
567
-
560
-
549
-
497
-
495
-
491
-
485
-
457
-
448
-
431
-
422
-
379
-
377
-
364
-
362
-
362
-
359
-
358
-
348
-
340
-
336
-
325
-
318
-
318
-
314
-
313
-
311
-
308
-
306
-
304
-
303
-
297
-
294
-
293
-
271
-
270
-
265
-
262
-
259
-
247
-
246
-
244
-
235
-
230
-
228
-
226
-
223
-
223
-
221
-
220
-
219
-
218
-
216
-
211
-
210
-
208
-
204
-
202
-
201
-
198
-
198
-
197
-
197
-
196
-
I nominate Sir Cloudesley Shovell, not just for his silly name, but he caused the Scilly Naval Disaster, in which he sailed his ships into rocks of the coast of scilly and Four large ships, HMS Association, the third-rate HMS Eagle, the fourth-rate HMS Romney and the fire ship HMS Firebrand all sank, he himself d ied and so did 2,000 others. There is also a story that alleges that a common sailor on the flagship tried to warn Shovell that the fleet was off course but Shovell had him hanged at the yardarm for inciting mutiny. Even if not true the fact that people find him that incompetent, that they'd believe something like that, is a testament to his nomination for the Darwin Award.
195
-
194
-
192
-
187
-
187
-
184
-
184
-
184
-
184
-
182
-
181
-
My school is over 500 years old and the school houses are, Hawkins, Drake, Howard, Frobisher, Grenville and Raleigh and in the great hall where we ate lunch, they have huge stained glass windows along the side of the hall with each of them doing famous things they did, so Drake is bowling etc. And then at end is a central stained glass window of Elizabeth 1st and her court, it's very impressive and looks quite like the dinning hall in Harry potter. We also had different ties for each house, with different coloured stripes gold and red for Hawkins, Drakes was green and red etc. You wore those when you were in Junior school and high school and didn't wear them when you were in 6th form though. The only thing they were relevant for was inter-school sports and academic competitions, they have a list of all the winners going back over 200 years or so and my house Hawkins has never won either of the cups. Our house leader would always talk about the Hawkins conspiracy as to why we never won.
181
-
180
-
178
-
178
-
171
-
171
-
170
-
My school is over 500 years old and the school houses are, Hawkins, Drake, Howard, Frobisher, Grenville and Raleigh and in the great hall where we ate lunch, they have huge stained glass windows along the side of the hall with each of them doing famous things they did, so Drake is bowling etc. And then at end is a central stained glass window of Elizabeth 1st and her court, it's very impressive and looks quite like the dinning hall in Harry potter. We also had different ties for each house, with different coloured stripes gold and red for Hawkins, Drakes was green and red etc. You wore those when you were in Junior school and high school and didn't wear them when you were in 6th form though.
169
-
168
-
168
-
167
-
164
-
160
-
158
-
155
-
155
-
154
-
154
-
152
-
152
-
151
-
151
-
151
-
150
-
150
-
148
-
144
-
144
-
144
-
142
-
142
-
141
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
139
-
139
-
139
-
138
-
135
-
135
-
134
-
133
-
133
-
132
-
129
-
128
-
128
-
126
-
126
-
125
-
123
-
122
-
121
-
120
-
120
-
119
-
119
-
118
-
117
-
117
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
114
-
114
-
112
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
110
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
108
-
104
-
104
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
98
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
I think a great example is HMS Shannon who actually had a 1v1 fight in 1812, her armament and the performance of her sister ship HMS Guerriere, would show she should lose to Chesapeake, but not just did she win, she won so decisively, you'd need 4 chessapeake's too have the same number of cannon balls hitting Shannon as hit Chessapeake. This doesn't even go into the tactics and the way the Shannon had a cannon at the bow specifically placed their to act like a giant sniper rifle taking out the cheesapeakes helmsmen and wheel, this wasn't a particularly normal tactic, but won them the battle.
Another example is HMS Speedy Vs El Gamo 14 guns vs 32 guns of bigger calibre, yet Speedy won.
The idea of doing a 1v1 based on specs does not show training or how ships are set up differently, the accuracy or preferred tactics, it doesn't examine the captains. Or as you said when, where and why they are fighting which create 100s of different results.
94
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
My Grandfather was a stoker on a royal navy Minesweeper, sweeping the area before the main attack. He actually joined a year early and was the smallest stoker, but by the end of the war he was chief stoker and very stocky. A lot of the time he was doing the Arctic conveys, must have been scary knowing that if you were hit, you will most likely d ie being in the engine room. His father my great grandfather was a decorated war hero in WW1 winning a military medal for talking out a german machine nest. He was at the 1st battle of ypres, gallipoli, Somme, Aden, passchendale (where he won that medal), Africa and Italy. We have his service Bible with all the locations he went. At gallipoli alone he was injured 4 different times losing a figure and another his best friend being blown up next to him. After the war he became an alcoholic and broke his medal in two, it must have been very hard to send his two sons off to war and hard for them as well, to think about how they will return. My grandfathers brother a Sergeant in the royal artillery died in 1943 in Tunisia at Tabega Gap, he had met General Montgomery a week prior. We have the newspaper cuttings of the roll of honor which they would put a message in every year. One of the other people on that list had a message by their family reading "we laugh with others, we cry alone, how much we will miss them will never be known"
80
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
One thing that sort of proves your point is the opposite as well, the golden age of piracy has very little contemporary paintings on it and nothing to the scale were you can understand the actual lines of a ship as almost all are 2d things that the measurement are all wrong for, if they were correct Bartholomew Roberts ship Royal Fortune was bigger than a city, and the earth is concave. The time was one of great change in ship design, you can find many paintings of grand 1st rates which are so over the top I still can't wrap my head around that those transom existed, but frigates and smaller ships pirates would use, there are no detailed paintings of, so you have to do a bit of guess work, you don't know how orinate they would be, how squared the transom is etc. It's no wonder pirate movies and TV shows always get the ships wrong, as they are looking at ships 9x+ heavier.
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
57:27 interestingly enough you could say this happened in a way with the first Ocean going Steam powered warship, the 20 gun PS Rising Star commissioned in 1822 for Thomas Cochrane. This was when he was Admiral of the Brazilian Navy, it was payed for by Thomas Cochrane and then transferred to the Brazilian Navy. It was never used in action as the war was almost over, it had an interesting design of internal paddle wheels to protect them a bit more from cannon fire. The first Steam warship to participate in combat was the Karteria commissioned in 1826 and first saw combat in 1827 in which it was highly effective. This again involves Cohrane, he and another British naval officer Frank Abney Hastings, were employed by the Greek government in their independence movenment against the ottomans. They set out a plan to build 6 Steam warships and buy two old 74 gun ship of the lines and razee them to become heavy frigates, this plus the rest of the Greek fleet was seen as good enough to take on the ottoman navy. This was very ambitious and in the end only 1 steamship was delivered and they got two heavy Frigates built in the US rather than Razeeing a 74, but due to major corruption in the end the Greeks could only got 1 Frigate. The Steamship although only having 8 x 68 pounder guns proved to be brilliant, using the power plants Steam to create heated shot and a method developed by Hastings to stop any barrel explosions, meant that it was highly effective and destroyed quite a number of ships even when the Greek side was outnumbered in the battle. Sorry went off on a bit of tangent at the end, just thought it was such a cool naval story.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@nickssurplus well actually Brown instituted regulation so the same sub prime mortgage packages couldn't be done, but okay you pretend he deregulated. For Blair I am unaware he deregulated the banks even if he did, the specific regulation that was got rid of that caused the recession was done under the Tories.
Labour wasn't in charge in the early 80s maybe look at Maggies very poor leadership also we never needed IMF loans.
But we hadn't maxed out our credit card our current debt is 2.2 trillion our debt back when Brown left office was 1 trillion, you've been told this mutiple times yet you refuse to face reality that the Tories expanded the debt.
And your last question shows why you are so ignorant, nick you have not even a basic understanding of how economics works, it's genuinely embarrassing, the idea you would compare a country to your personal credit card id bafflingly politically illiterate. Coming here with pub talk won't get you anywhere, when you can't even rap your head around our current debt.
P.s. do you think screaming Guardian at everyone means anything, we've presented you with fact, you shouting about a news outlet just shows you as a tribal loon, who's not interested in the truth.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
I think the most important point made is the decrease in planning officers over the last 13 years due to tory cuts. You can have planning officers at times dealing with over 100 cases at once and as he said they have 8 weeks to be sorted. That is neighbour consultation, site visit, parish Council consultation, other consultation such as highways, environmental etc. Catch up if something isn't correct in the application, do a site visit, committee hearings, Write a 1,500 word report and they have just over 2 hours to dedicate to each case. Of course there will be over runs. This is compounded as the stress means planning officers leave and then more cases go onto the ones left. One thing you'll notice if you ever enter a planning department is most of the men are bald, because they are working in a very stressful environment, due to budget cuts, angry applicants and neighbours etc.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@stevevalley7835 Just to preface this the fact you haven't even watched the video and talking this confidently is baffling in it's ignorance. Now back to your inane comment. Firstly at 24,000 yards the shell would be dropping at a 23.8 degree angle, so most likely not a hit on the belt secondly a much more likely hit on the deck would not penertrate at 24,000 yards. Thirdly that's not KGV it was put up against, that was standard armour plate, the Royal Navy had better battleship armour plate than any other nation, I believe it was equivalent too 7% thicker than German armour plate of the same inch and 15% for the US. Fourth your article is disputed by other sources in others 24,000 yards it can only penertrate 13 inches of armour so it would penertrate any battleship but KGV and Yamato Fifth the Germans historically only managed to hit hood at 18,000 yards at which any ship will be penertrated, even with the excellent armour KGV had compared to it's contemporaries. Sixth if you bothered to watch the video you'd have seen that at 24,000 yards KGV's penertration is still very competitive, in fact punching through thicker armour than the 16 inch on the North Carolina.
Historically Bismarck didn't dictate range and that's because getting up to full steam takes a long time, and with Royal Navy gunnery being very good, you've already been hit and your speed has been reduced by that time.
Why in the world would a video about KGV talk about some Americans and their moronic ideas, it's pretty obvious you are coming into this with a very big cognitive bias.
P.s. what in the world was the point in bringing up Surageo Straight, if the point wasn't to do with those shots
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
1. We have a labour shortage migration helps the economy
2. Yes house prices are increasing, which is a market failure, therefore the government needs to build housing and make a nice sustainable profit
3. "Single motherhood being classed as an occupation'", this is just not true, which makes me question, if you are all there. Looking after a child should be classed as a full time occupation, because it is. Also I like how you go after the mothers but let the father off Scot-free.
4. Didn't know the entire nation only made what 0.7% of the GDP, oh wait that's not even close to all, almost like you keep l ying. Think you should understand what foreign aid, gains us in return and realise that your push against it again shows your economic illiteracy, let alone your lack of humanity.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.
Methodist Pastor David Barnhart
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@djc84 well it is kidnapping because they never arrested the person, they never stated who they were, they just shoved the person into a van, on top of that they were also army personal so have no right to arrest people either. What arson, vandalism, rioting and looting was that guy involved in, he wasn't even charged with anything you utter imbecile, have you even watched the video 🤦♂️
The police in Portland have been arresting people, so well done you've told another lie.
Federal agents can only arrest when people attack federal monuments or buildings which no one has done in Portland, this is insanely simple knowledge that you lack. How are you this mentally deficient, your entire comment shows off ignornace on a level I rarely see.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.
Methodist Pastor David Barnhart
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jimsmith997 Just to preface this you failed on the only task I sent you on, so well done you've proved nobody back then used politican in the wrong way you are using it. Just a little piece of advice there is no need to write when you have nothing to say. Please take it to heart your rambling gish gallops are not just boring but insufferable in the way they obfuscate the conversation and consistently tell falsehoods.
Now back to your inane comment, that's why I said civil servant not civil service... read what I write.
They were considered political parties at the time and were well formed.
The defintion of a politician is not whether they are heavily involved in governance, how are you this uneducated on a simple concept, as again that would mean the kings and advisors were politicans too, the defintion of politican is that they are elected or seek election in the government, something lord and kings don't do.
It doesn't make it unlikely he was not an MP it makes it impossible, just admit it, MP's being sent abroad is, totally different than my other job sent me abroad nothing to do with the government. The fact you had the gall to try and slip that past me is a testament to how dishonest you are.
And your last sentence shows you are working off a defintion of politican that is from a different dimension, just admit it. As this is getting very tedious debunking everything you say, your comment are you agreeing with everything I say and then saying but maybe he was a politician, not just do you look foolish, you look stupid.
3
-
@jimsmith997 how am I a troll, most trolls don't ask you to be honest... I'm glad you actually read my comment, it is a bit of a shame you still ignored some it. For example right at the start you had to ignore the fact he is on a different continent... one of the most important reasons he is not an MP, the fact you ignore this, shows how dishonest you are being, because if you did acknowledge it, it would debunk what you said. The fact not one person in two movies said he was a politican, also shows what a fool you are making out of yourself.
"Nor at this point, had political parties fully developed" this is just factually incorrect, why you'd lie like this I don't know, I understand you are out of your depth, but to lie like this is very silly.
Your entire next paragraph is just a big obfuscation with factually incorrect statements sprinkled in, you claim people would use the word politician differently back then, which by your made up defintion means they'd have call the king and civil servants, advisors etc politicans... So go on, find me one mention of someone in the house of Lords at the time the quote was made, being called a politician at the time (so not they were a politician for example)... Come on give one source, this is going to be beautiful are you going to ignore this or run away, I wonder. Judging by your past dishonesty, you are going to ignore it.
"What qualifications do you have" Ah is this going to be an attempt at an appeal to authority, due to you losing the argument.
3
-
@jimsmith997 it's obvious you don't understand what a politican is you said a Lord is one 🤦♂️, also the fact it has taken you this long to realise what the conversation was about is utterly embarrassing.
It is impossible for Beckett to be an MP as he already has a job with EIC therefore he can't be an MP, come on Jim we've been over this fact mutiple times. Now repeat after me you cannot have a full time job on a different continent and be an MP.
Right so you are just outright lying now, I thought it was ignorance but you are just lying, no by defintion of the word Lord is not a politicians, because you need to be seeking or in an elected office to be a politican, Lords are not elected, you got it yet?
The irony of your last sentence is palpable, but I think the fact you are starting to just lie now Jim, means you know I'm correct but you'll string out the conversation. All because you have a juvunile aversion to being taught something when you are proved wrong.
P.s. I do not believe you are reading my comments, due to the amount of times I have to say something to enter your brain. So the code word is cheese, if you don't say it you've proved, how dishonest you are.
3
-
@jimsmith997 How many times am I going to have to tell you this you cannot be in the house of Lords and be a politican as politicians are in the house of commons as they are elected, you cannot be in both at the same time, you can be one at one time, one at the other, but not at the same time. This isn't speculating on Becketts life this is basics of how the parliament works.
It was some other person who claimed Beckett was a politican, which obviously he can't be he's got a job already with the East India Company and is stationed on a different continent, then they also like you have confused the title of Lord as meaning politician, which it just doesn't.
Lord Liverpool was in the commons and then afterwards entered the house of lords, Duke of Wellington was in the house of Lords after, being a politician do you see, and there are tons of Earls of Mornington so being more specific would be helpful.
Again Politicians are in the house of commons and Lords are in the upper house.
3
-
3
-
@jimsmith997 no you've misunderstood, being in the house of Lords means he is not a polictican, they review policy, just like consultants, Civil Service, urban planners etc. Who are also not politicians but (especially in the case of the civil service) are politically influential. (Also the Lords job is exactly the same now as it was in the 18th century, so not sure what you mean by " they were still an important polictical force" as they still are now) So just to recap being in the house of Lords means he is not a polictican at that point, do you understand?
It's less likely he'd be a politican, as most employees in the British East India Company even at this level were not politicians, but it's possible, just like now if you'd be poetically advantageous for them, you are sort of garentueed a job
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ThumperE23 Chesapeake again was not fur built you are thinking of Essex, how many times will I have to say this to you? The Shannon beat Chesapeake so easy because captain Philip Broke had trained his crew better than any captain on the planet at the time, he had also added some of the most innovative additions to his guns all in all making his ship over 4 times as accurate as Chesapeake, that is why she lost so handily. Just a short list of why Philip Broke obviously won, sailing ships decks curve downwards, so to counter this curve he cut the wheels down on the 'up slope' side of the cannon so the cannon would be horizontal, he added adjustable tangent sights to his guns, he had added evelation groves for the quions (bit of wood under the barrel), they incised markings behind the gun so that even if a gun couldn't see the target it could be directed onto it using the angles on the floor, creating one of the first types of 'director firing' this allowed him to target exact sections of ship as well if he wanted too and did to Chesapeake. He extensively trained his crew in hand to hand combat and when doing gunnery exercises with the cannon he would blindfold his crew give them the location of the target(often a barrel) and they had to hit it off that blindfolded. He had a 9 pounder cannon installed on the quarter deck to act as a giant sniper rifle to take out the healmsman and wheel. This all lead to Shannon being more than 4 times as accurate as Chesapeake, in a very short engagement that came into close quarters quickly favouring the less accurate Chesapeake. It was nothing to do with the wood and all to do with the Shannon being so incredibly good. Just another example of wood is USS President she was one of the first built considered one of the best examples of the 6 frigates, yet HMS Endymion even at her longest range was easily flinging shot through President. If you want to know what the Royal Navy thought of Presient and Chesapeake it was this they are strongly built, however quite slow, a lot of the wood was defective(using rare live oak is the reason why, as they had to use what they got), the design ironically for how they are positioned in popular culture was seen as quite out-dated, if you want to blame construction blame those things, but it wasn't made of furs.
P.s. we do have quite a number of American documents actually.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.
Methodist Pastor David Barnhart
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The irony is she understands it better than you, she unlike you knows it's a link to a place an NFT is, which you buy not the NFT itself.
1) I have to point out that an NFT will be stolen and then sold instantly, also the way NFT's actually work, it is incredibly easy to steal and change the records as an NFT gives you a link of where to find your image not the image itself, meaning the image can be taken and then just the link changed
2) the problem is yes you can get a print of the Mona Lisa, but it's not a painting done by the same person, it will not be completed in oil or have even 1/10th the work put in. A right click copy of an NFT is the same picture done by the artist, at the same quality, in the same medium, there is no difference except one has artifical value.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CurtisSmale how in the hell can I know what sources he uses if I haven't watched him 🤦♂️ The only time he reads non right wing papers is because he wants to rant about how terrible an opinion piece he has only read the title of is, you know like real journalists do.... (that's sarcasm by the way).
The reason left wing sources are graded as more reliable is because they are, this is just factually correct.
Common sense, like masks don't help in preventing the spread of the virus that kind of common sense....
You think TYT are far left, have you been to Europe, they are milk toast over here.
But anyway thank you for reaffirming my position, you said nothing of value, you gave no evidence of how I am wrong, and just like Timmy instead of sticking to the topic, at the end run away to another topic, that you are equally ignorant on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@WombRaider7878 you said I lied, the entire point of his comment, was not understanding what unarmed means. Either way it's total hypocrisy from you, if you know he was wrong, but only went after me, for thinking bashing someone repeatedly with a fire extinguisher could you know hurt a little, something I never thought I'd be challenged on, yet here you are.
You think being bashed repeatedly with a fire extinguisher would do nothing, do you want to ask your carer why that's not true, so they can make sure you don't hit people with extinguishers. Just because it wasn't a well organised attack, doesn't make it not an attack, why I still have to explain this to you?
Not from the USA so I don't get DNC talking points, but well done at showing you have no argument. Please continue as it's really fun laughing at you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cab4 I have to say when people talk about cancer research, do people on the news and YouTube videos, speak technically... No. But I have never gone therefore that means the scientist (which ironically in your field unlike climate science are actually being interviewed) are sh it and don't go through pier review and constant rethinks.
The answer is very simple climate science is well over 100 years old there as been tons of revisions to technique, so there aren't any observable weaknesses left in data collection right now, it's been run through so many times and models have been proven to work, from 100,000s of pier reviewed papers, Skeptism is a buzzword, what we employ is the scientific method, and the thing is unless you disagree with our ability to judge the fundamentals of temperature, your point is mute. As IPCC models have been correct although on the conservative side is the only critism the entire opposite of JP. Also the idea a physiologist can come at us for our ability to test and retest is laughable.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Skeletor Did Nothing Wrong You think that sentence is incohient how? it's quite long but I was pointing out how ludicious your satement is.
You are mental if you think the french revolution happened because Louis XVI wore tights, god you idiot it was the fashion then and more than 700 years before then. People were starving in the streets back then, but no it must have been because one man hardly any of the population saw, wore a more expensive version of something as everyone else did but a time traveling told them he was a sissy because only women wear those now. Interesringly Louis XVI didn't really wear make up he wore less than the previous generations so it seems like your theory is inverse, when a man is so insecure that a bit of paint gets on his face he feels emasculated, society starts to have more problems well I mean all you have to look at is ww1 and ww2 not long after that happened. Like do you think the rock for example is destroying society or Arnold both of them wear make up in films as do all actors.
I'm obviously not going to read all of this text wall, please well stop waffling. But I did notice at the bottom this stuff about nihilism where did I say I was a nihilist (just to point out nihilism is a philosophy, narcissism is a phycological dis-order, you can be both, you can be one, you can be neither I'm unfortuantly for your strawman neither.) Anyway the reason I responded was it is beautiful bit of projection, mate I'm just about to complete uni and go into a job for life that will put me in the top 8% of households with my salary alome, when I leave I'm not going to complain about being oppressed I will be the oppressor 😉. But the irony is you'll say all this shit while I have a top job and your still stuck in your mum's basement. Also You sound like you know a lot about drag queens intimately I might add, did you do it is that why, oh what's your stage name? You think it's Drag Queens that lost touch with the Divine, how?? There are drag acts in the bible there are cross dresser in the bible and what did god do nothing he didn't care they were just in random stories.
I don't know how you can call anyone else a cult of low self-esteem when you are try to make people feel bad and your self feel bad for wearing some cloth, jeez you are just a walking contradiction. did you find a problem with drag-kings? (Women who dress as men)
I wouldn't mind you just watching the channels called "contrapoints" and "philosophy Tube" on nihilism, I feel like it'd really help you out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@maximtcaciuc2904 this isn't true the only reason people didn't think they'd last this long is because they believed the military would collapse as soon as Russian troops crossed the border, it didn't so the predictions now are weeks too a couple of months.
Well the differences between Iraq and Vietnam was that the US had overwhelming firepower not that they struggled due to distance give me one way they struggled? Russia has chosen not too go in with overwhelming firepower. The US airforce, army and navy was so much bigger in the Vietnam war than now, Russia has ~1,500 combat aircraft in total in it's entire arsenal, the US lost 2,200 alone in Vietnam and 5,600 helicopters as well. The scale of the US involvement was staggering vs about 100 migs at a time, ironically practically the same number of combat aircraft as Ukraines airforce had at the start, however Ukraines are relatively more modern compared to their counterpart. So it's a brilliant comparison. Iraq is also flat it took over a month to plough through against a much worse army and the US in the same time had made less progress. Are you kidding even if Ukraine has doubted the invasion they'd still have plans and they've been at war in the donbass since 2014. Hay also why did you leave out yugoslavia is that cause it debunks everything you've said?
For your last sentence we don't even know what they've lost, so your last comment is just conjecture and as always in conflict they've lost a lot less than the enemy claim.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jimsmith997 well yes you are a politican if you are trying to become an MP, that is correct you don't have to be elected, just trying to be elected, however that is the same then as now. And you can't become an MP if you are in the house of Lords, I have told you this mutiple times.
Just because they had more powers back then doesn't make them suddenly politicians.
Well done, for proving my point, Lord Liverpool had an inherited peerage, the fact he was a lord was nothing to do with him being a politican, get it yet?
Just to preface this I physically face palmed at your sentence it was that silly and I'm being kind here, Beckett can't be a politican for the very simple fact he already has a full time job, the fact he is a lord indicates he is in the house of Lords therefore even more not a politician.
It does preckude you from being a politican if you are in the house of Lords, have you not been listening?
The fact you are still going on a topic, it's obvious you are way out of your depth in is getting very tedious now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Norvik_-ug3ge Are you just obsessed with misrepresentation or something, we are talking about comedians and you want to talk about panel shows. Are you just really stupid or will you say anything so you can think you are right.
But okay then let's do that then the last time there was an all female panel show was in 1967... so in 2014 the BBC said panel shows cannot be all male so half of the population can at least have some represention, doesn't that sound fine and really a good thing, unless you were allergic to women, I guess. However I'm with Dara it didn't need to be announced, as then you get weirdos like you, making prescriptive judgement on women kind and the people on the show. Who even with the quota have to get there by merit. So again is it a comedian quota no not at all, is it a panel show quota I guess, most panel shows already exceeded the quota anyway, including mock the week, so it hasn't even changed. Bringing up the obvious question why you brought it up at all, it doesn't involve comedians, Mock the Week already exceeded the quota and Dara spoke on it and was on my side, not yours.
Now please actually address what I said, instead of the generic you're triggered because you said words or just saying facts, even though you have presented zero facts I had to look them up myself, your "facts" about Dara where incorrect and your "fact" about comedian quotas was also a lie.
So it's PC to support gender equality, what planet do you live on, how disconnected from reality are you?
Also I'm not letting you off the hook that easily you lied about Dara and now are calling him PC after I pointed out the facts, now you've changed your position on him.
"At least the sort for women... but not for men" thank you for revealing your hypocrisy, just like all anti-feminist if men are doing worse quotas are needed thick and fast, women doing worse well it just natural and quotas are Orwellian...
Also did you seriously use a quote from animal farm to describe a quota 🤦♂️ tell me where in the BBC announcement did it say it will pick worse women then men or did you just assume that the women had to be lower quality....
P.s. yes if quotas would help I'd do them for men too, I.e. attainment in schools although there maybe different action that can be taken there, but it's the same kind of forcing as a quota.
2
-
2
-
@jonjohnson1978. cutting out the platitudes in your comment is quite an eye opener at how little you have actually said, you have responded to nothing in my last comment which is very embarrassing and shows a juvinile tendency to fill your time with insults rather than arguments. All you've done is accuse me of being a women and a feminist, which I'm not (and I am confused why that would matter anyway....). Then you say studies have proven females are less funny than men, firstly provide a link, secondly average means nothing to an individual, which means you've now changed your argument which shows how dishonest you are being. Less is not a very good descriptor is it what was the %... Was it perceived to be or was it actually less funny because those are too very different things and lastly can you tell me in that study where it said the difference was biological in nature.... Oh and please actually respond to what I said instead of weasling out of it like you did in your last comment.
P.s. if you think what I wrote was an essay, I doubt you've ever read a study in your life, as it would obviously be above your level. And secondly in what world was a nerve hit, did you plan that response in your head before you reading my comment, because it's obvious from my comment that I'm just pointing out all the mindbogglingly stupid things you've said, it took a long time because you are obviously quite adapt at cramming as much idiotic things in as small as space as possible. You obviously agree as you have defended nothing you've said so far, you've run away from your positions like the little coward you are already, it's quite hilarious tbh.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Maverick-gg2do but that's the thing if the japanese force withdraws it can attack the landing force at another point and the American force might move back to protect the landing force.
I mean no that isn't a garentuee that they would fight each other, that has never happened historically. All it takes is one ship breaking down, a night attack, having scouting forces, fuel, obscuring of forces, priorities in different areas, wrong intelligence, correct intelligence, breaking up forces as distractions, speed, too where the ships moor. The likelihood of them fighting at all full strength or in a full on fight is miniscule.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@awfm0 1. You don't know what windfall means do you. Windfall tax means external factors caused it, the company did nothing to get those profits, got it? Cyclical is planned for they know sometimes they will run at a loss and other times at a profit, based off of their calculations, seasonality, got that? Therefore windfall profits are absolutely nothing to do with their normal profits, got it? Therefore taxing windfall does not touch normal profits, that's what windfall means abnormal.
2. Instead of assuming what I think, actually address what I say, you seem to have little knowledge on this topic. I'm having to dumb things down so much it's exhausting. Yes prices rose beforehand due to supply chain issues. What has that got to do with windfall.
Oil shareholders do not care about dividends, oh and seen as you have very little knowledge of anything dividends is what a shareholder receives if a company is in profit however this is very small and inconsequential for most people. They care about stock price going up and that is not based off of profit but size of the company.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LarsUlrichIsMe your first paragraph is nonsense, rewrite it
Yeah, because he's implying firslty that trans women aren't women, which is just transphobic. I've told you this fact over and over and you constantly ignore it, please listen this time as it's getting very dull constantly having to repeat the same things to you, like you are the slow kid in the class.
Are you dumb, women is in the word, I'm calling them a women you fool 🤦♂️ if I called them just women in this specific conversation it would be confusing, it's a clarifier. Although I don't know why I went to an effort to explain this, as you already know and you just said that because you knew your argument was falling apart, so just tried to distract.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As someone in the UK who had an emergency recently and had to be rushed to hospital, I feel so happy that I payed nothing at the point of use rather than the £13,000 I would have payed in the US, it gets worse as it turned out to be an infection that mimics the same pain, meaning I didn't need an operation I just needed antibiotics which in the US would be $100 in Wales I paid nothing. I would have payed £13,000 to stay overnight in a hospital I didn't even have a good night's sleep in, you can be very sure that in that amount of debt, let alone that I was at university and the university debt in the US is astronomical, I doubt I could live with myself for spending £13,000, when I only needed $100 in medicine. By the way remember £13,000 is their cost, for the NHS to keep someone in overnight it cost them £400, so it wasn't even like I was a huge drain on the state, 2 or so years wages would pay it off (the tax taken out), and a possible life time of debt in the US.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NoobieToob firstly the Taliban has succeeded there is no need for them to ever do a terrorist attack again, just think for two seconds Secondly this means you're numbers go down to a few thousand in the entire of Afghanistan of which even the Taliban are against them, so they have zero friends to get them papers, of which they would have to wait weeks for, instead of just going on a commercial flight which will risk zero chance of being caught or refused which a majority of people trying to leave are being. On top of all that being such a small group they are obviously preoccupied with the transition period and will need every fighter available in Afghanistan, to stop Taliban incursions and possibly grad extra land, again just think for two seconds. We'll it will be effective, if what you mean is it is possible for someone to slip though, then yes, just like on a plane, you don't deny the hopes of hundreds of thousands of human beings or planes from existing for your frightened infetesnimaly small possibility.
The problem you have is you've forgot that ISIS K, wants to keep land so sending their forces across the world is stupid that's why they won't and you've also forgot cilivan planes exist, yeah I know, you can actually buy this thing called a ticket and go on them and this means you don't even have to talk to three different militaries that want you dead, wonderful isn't it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.
Methodist Pastor David Barnhart
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sinn0100 first one he didn't beat Cenk at best for Shapiro he drew, for most people he lost because of these few words "let's say" he doesn't have the facts he has hypotheticals born out of his feelings.
Second paragraph just learn what a devils advocate is, this is not American tv. It's actually quite embrassessing that you would put this because this is a very well known journalistic technique, almost all interviews especially political ones in the UK are conducted like this, you'd think for some a big brain like Shapiro he'd have done some research.. . Andrew Neil is a massive conservative it was not his own politics. Awwhh did the word barbaric trigger you do you need a safe space from the nasty man, who says the bad words. If he is this master debater that beat the young Turks with ease how could he not deal with these simple questions when they would say exactly the same 🤔
Also he left after Andrew Neil asked him what are the jeudeo-christian values we have been stepping away from, and Benny boy couldn't answer him so he stormed off like a child.
Andrew Neil is right wing he writes for the spectator and the daily mail for God's sake. The BBC has to be neutral or it would get shut down you idiot. It got a bit weird at the end there with your weird fan fiction.
Wow such strong language calling me indignant that is just yellow of you showing of your biases, I should pull the plug on this comment now as that is the clever thing to do... ;)
Anyway I'll wait for you to strawman, double down, shift the goalposts, claim you knew shit you obviously didn't and ignore most of the shit I say
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crown9413 did you genuinely just say the new deal extended the great depression 🤦♂️ It ended it this is observable fact.
If it caused economic growth why can you give zero examples of that happening. Also I know you are totally out of your depth on the topic on economics but can you explain a "free up labour and resources from the government" would mean.
Please just look this up, government spending in real terms has dropped since 2010, look it up now, because if you can't even acknowledge reality this conversation cannot continue.
You don't even believe this do you, companies are made of people who at the top want to get rich, if you inventive them to keep more profit they are more likely to take that option so they can get richer. We both know this.
What you just said is nonsencial tax is only on profits, therefore unless a company said we have to have X amount of profit after taxes. Which no company on earth does and again I will challenge you to name one, which you keep failing to do. Companies that do talk of profitability talk of pre tax profits. Again remember profits, is post investment, they are post purchases, post maintaince, post wages. How a lower profit percentage return after taxes would effect the other you'll have to explain because as we both know, that's not how it works. Firstly the country with the largest amount of inward investment in europe right now is France with a higher corporation tax than us and a lot higher than Ireland. Not to mention tax havens are not a boom for the people living in those nations as the company economically does not interact with your country causing no effect for the general population. This is really basic economics and obviously observable fact when you look at many tax havens.
"We have has Kaynesian economics has been constantly used" are you drunk? What does that even mean are you trying to claim the UK is using Kaynesian economics now? Because that just Shoes you know nothing about economics, do you not feel em barrassed at all?
So let's address the first three economic terms you've used this entire conversation it's a shame you have no clue what they mean or how they relate to economics.
1. Deficit spending is occurring because tax cuts on the rich coupled with austerity which causes an economic slump, means the government cannot collect enough money. That is not Kaynesian, in fact that's the opposite
2. Qualitative easing again is occurring because the government is having short falls due to it's economic mismanagement. This again is not Kaynesian economics as it's not even being used in anyway that is used in Kaynesian economics. You should know this this is really basic now.
3. Monetary policy includes the other two, see this is the issue when you have no clue what you are talking about. Not to mention how has our monetary policy caused our current inflation, inflation has been historically low for a decade and it spiked due to profiteering and supply chain shortages. This is a fact just look it up.
Sorry did you just blame the international factors in the 1970s on Kaynesian economics in the 60s 🤦♂️ you are one baffling human.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stoicsceptic8420 what was the point of your last comment you've said nothing, you are preaching to the choir, however in a very arrogant and emb arranging way. I don't like PFI under blair I said that in my first sentence you utter m oron. However, as you keep on avoiding, Blair's PFI has nothing to do with the state the NHS is in now, does it. Go on you've seen the analysis, kid... I will again reiterate the fact, you didn't mention price for the simple reason those 1700 has no major effect on today. Also why are you talking about partisan? Are you claiming to be a centrist, how cringe can you get. Especially when you are refuting public private partnerships, which is the bed Rock of Neo-liberalism our current political paradigm. Your last comment is more partisan than me, because you are screeching how awful public private is, while I am just saying they are bad. To finish off your last sentence is just terrible and very fitting with your silly username, I can tell so much about you it hilarious, garentuee you are an atheist and have katana's don't you. Nothing wrong with that, but very revealing of the angle you approach this conversation from, which makes your comments so disjointed and pointless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jonjohnson1978. why does it matter if my posts, sorry posta are edited....
Why are you lying, I addressed it directly in my comment, I said it's the equivalent of I have black friend excuse, as you then go on to claim women aren't as funny and said it's biological, when the studies I gave you showed it is social.
Then you say people only go to comedy shows to be humoured by them, ignoring the fact I pointed out most of the money comedians make is from tv and movies. It would help if you actually read what I write. I have told you this countless times, to actually read my comments and you are still falling flat on your face, it makes you look, not just incredibly ignorant, but incredibly stupid too, when you are 3 comments behind in the conversation and I've already debunk the stuff you are talking about.
1
-
@jonjohnson1978. how is you thinking females arn't funny an opinion, I've given you 5 studies including a meta-analysis that prove you wrong. You can have that thought, but you are just factually wrong.
If we go off wages Army Schumer is the 7th best comedian in the world, and Kevin hart is the best.... wages don't tell the full story do they. As most wages are made up from TV shows, movies and not comedy gigs. If we go by your wage logic, the best actor in the world by your standard would be The Rock for gods sake, do you see how silly what you said is now?
My position is the scientifically supportrd one, which is women are funny of course they are, the reason there are more male comedians is social not biological and this could be addressed. You maybe a bit confused because you clearly don't read what I write and you write so much bollocks that I'm often telling you how you are wrong for most of it and not what is correct.
My god I've told you three times now, I don't care if there are mistakes on your side or mine, unless it's hard to understand what the other is saying. You are the idiot who brought it up in the first place, all I did was point out how hypocritical and stupid of you that was. Oh by the way I edited it to add in the quotes (you know you ones with tons of spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, that procedure you were lying about your original position) not to change my spellings you presumptive imbecile.
1
-
@jonjohnson1978. the bit that was hard to decipher was when you went off on a tangent about wages, read what I write it might help you understand...
So firstly what you have just said about some female comedians being funny, is the equivalent of I have a black friend. I said that the difference is social not biological (this being back up by studies) and that social difference can be addressed, to which you replied with (spelling mistakes all yours by the way): "opinions vary, if you ratio out number of female comedians who have been on the show with how many are funny its significantly lower, it's also quite evident in the majority of the 'scenes we'd like to see'that thr females grt less laughs than the men" and "I'm guessing from your diatribe your a women, a feminist or both, either way a nerve was hit rather amusingly and after reading your essay of drivel it's clear that there's no way you'll acknowledge a clear and study proven truth that females are less funny than men."
How in the world you can pretend you were not saying women are just less funny than men and always will be is beyond me.
Next do you black out when you write your comments, you are the moron who brought up grammar and spelling in the first place, I was saying how it was hypocritical therefore my comment is not ironic. If you read my original response to your pedantry I said I didn't care and didn't bother bring it up, when you did it before, unless I could not understand what you wrote. The main reason I actually brought it up this time was because it was illegible, unlike mine which were autocorrect mistakes which we both knew the true spellings of.
P.s. gloating over length when I have explained multiple times that the long length is due to me having responding to stupidity you cram into even sentence of your comment, is incredibly weird and quite sad that you'd rather troll due to a lack of intellectual ability on your part, than just call it a day.
1
-
@jonjohnson1978. right your comment is very hard to decipher, the grammar is so bad and the amount of missing words mean it's impossible to know what you are talking about (the irony comparing that to your comment before that, is not lost on me). You seem to be talking abojt wages for some reason, so why are shifting the goalposts and I'm not joking here ,are you writing this drunk?
My next major question is, if you thought there was nothing to argue, why are you still here and why has it taken you about 4 comments to say there is nothing to argue... Your lies are so easy to debunk, it's so fun.
So I could repeat my comment but all you have to do is go up there and read and you'll see many things you didn't respond too.
Anyway let's go over these studies, now firstly you said many it was actually very hard to find any at all, especially that fit what you are saying. Next tell me did the study say that it was biological or social, basically are you saying that men (well some men) have a funny chromosome that cannot appear in women or intersex people? Another interesting thing were any of the studies about perception of which gender they perceive as funnier, as that is something very different and is actually more common study to exist. The problem here is you have taken studies, you still haven't provided any links for and given prescriptive judgements over an entire sex that do not match the conclusion. I have looked up these studies and they outright say it's most likely socially caused. And some are about controlled groups finding women less funny even when they are saying the same jokes with the same timing or for example captions of cartoons, indicating a unconscious bigoted bias in the audience.
Hooper, J., Sharpe, D. and Roberts, S.G.B., 2016. Are men funnier than women, or do we just think they are?. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(1), p.54.
Kalviknes Bore, I.L., 2010. (Un) funny women: TV comedy audiences and the gendering of humour. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(2), pp.139-154.
Mickes, L., Walker, D.E., Parris, J.L., Mankoff, R. and Christenfeld, N.J., 2012. Who’s funny: Gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), pp.108-112.
Greengross, G., Silvia, P.J. and Nusbaum, E.C., 2020. Sex differences in humor production ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, p.103886.
1
-
@jonjohnson1978. Again you do not bother to provide an argument. But the amount of anger in your comment at autocorrect mistakes, has revealed when you were saying touched a nerve, it was just projection on your part wasn't it, you were just getting angry because I'm right and you have no counter argument. Anyway so you've just spent all this time going after my insult and a few errors, which are easily mitigated by the myriad of grammatical mistakes you make in your comment.
So please just come back to me when you have an argument.
P.s. if you read what I wrote you'd understand it wasn't a justification, it was to point out how rude and juvenile it was to call all women vaginas. As you have proved you think calling him a dick was rude and uncalled for, therefore, calling all women vaginas is rude and uncalled for too, thank you for proving my point (obviously I find it interesting you were more aghast at me calling him a dick, but didn't really mind him calling half the population vaginas....).
Next obviously I have to point out pedantry over autocorrect, means nothing to this conversation expect distraction from you not having an argument. With the amount of spelling errors you make it is rather ironic you are trying to call me out on it 🤦♂️ Ah yes of course I think idiots is spelt idiotizs with a z and s, how inept at spelling do you have to be to think that was a genuine mistake, you are an utter joke. As I said before come back with an argument, not just an angry screed pointing out autocorrect problems like a junivile child.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-pf4yp5zv7z yeah she didn't like what he said, she and many others had worked hard to give them something the guy's wife requested, of course she'd be pissed at that moment. Although it seems that you missed the voice over ribbing the room, by the same women later on in the voiceover booth, almost like that was a rash first reaction, how apt for someone, saying I'm not paying attention enough. Are you kidding me, you are such a snowflake you genuinely think because the presenter said: you're speaking for them, that was the presenter implying misogyny, are you stupid or are you lying?
Oh nice you're using anecdotes now, well then I asked 50 friends equal women and men, equal young and old and they said you're wrong, so there. Anyway your friends who have agreed with the first statement (of her saying: he's speaking for her, is sort of wrong), ask them if they think it was implying misogyny and they'd probably laugh and look at you confused, because that is a leap in logic so far removed from the clip.
So I will ask again where was the implication of misogyny..... If you can't provide this I'd advice you to stop spreading misinformation and to delete your comment. There are enough lies spread around already, don't partake in it yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dessertfoxo4096 your first paragraph is just stupid and utter bollocks, it makes no difference, (it would only matter if it was due to a design flaw which it wasn't), not just is it whataboutism, not just does it not even address what I was saying, to go by that metric, that would mean you could say Yamato is weaker than Hms Dreadnought, you moron if we went for that metric.
Number 1 and 2 are hilarious in there stupidity again so, 705 vs 77, that destroys the idea of more shipping as relatively the Gato's have much more, but they did so much worse. Also the germans did a lot of work in the Mediterranean, where the entire italian navy was, which if I'm correct had more subs than britain and the Dutch combined had in the Pacific, even more than America for parts of the war, so when you are this uneducated on the topic maybe, don't comment :) Especially as you are just a salty American who can't take not being the best.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Great video as always, however you did make two errors, firstly Steam locomotives were around before Steam warships. Secondly the first Ocean going Steam powered warship was the 20 gun PS Rising Star built in 1822 for Thomas Cochrane when he was Admiral of the Brazilian navy, it was never used in action as the war was almost over, it had an interesting design of internal paddle wheels to protect them a bit more from cannon fire. The first Steam warship to participate in combat was the Karteria commissioned in 1826 and first saw combat in 1827 in which it was highly effective. This again involves Cohrane, he and another British naval officer Frank Abney Hastings, were employed by the Greek government in their independence movenment against the ottomans. They set out a plan to build 6 Steam warships and buy two old 74 gun ship of the lines and razee them to become heavy frigates, this plus the rest of the Greek fleet was seen as good enough to take on the ottoman navy. This was very ambitious and in the end only 1 steamship was delivered and they got two heavy Frigates built in the US rather than Razeeing a 74, but due to major corruption in the end the Greeks could only get 1 Frigate. The Steamship although only having 8 x 68 pounder guns proved to be brilliant, using the power plants Steam to create heated shot and a method developed by Hastings to stop any barrel explosions, meant that it was highly effective and destroyed quite a number of ships even when the Greek side was outnumbered in the battle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VPhantom-rf3qo you don't understand what I was pointing out most of the immigrants where Polish i.e. White in the early 2000s, yet you hated labour because you who probably live in a place 98% white, but imagine somewhere else there must be of brown people now living in the UK. And that makes you wet yourself because you're scared of the colour of people's skin.
What was the "quadruple" immigration policy, do you mean the skilled labour shortage we had that caused high immigration at the time, you know capitalism working as it should, it wasn't a policy either it's the labour markets working as they should, do you not believe in capitalism then?
The human rights act of 1998 contains nothing about any refugee can enter the nation, so you've already misread because you are not educated or are lying and the 2008 criminal Justice and immigration act again doesn't say what you think it does.
Okay seen as law isn't your strong suit, how about you just point out when these were revoked as during and after Blair and Brown's tenures both of the things you say these Acts stop, happened anyway. So come on tell me and don't obfuscate.
Your last line is beautiful who do you think is more likely to let Branson evade tax the tories or Labour, now I know you don't have much to any brain capacity so you may short circuit. But when you come back around, tell me. Go on don't run away from the point.
Now come on kid, as I said you sound like a nice guy, but what you speak about reveals a really lonely and awful life you must lead, do you not want to talk about that son?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1