Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "DW Documentary" channel.

  1. 7
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7.  @stefanl5183  No good dude. The current unemployment rate is 3.4% -- one of the lowest unemployment rates in the history of the country. Everyone who is able and looking has a job and our economy has never been better. Your arguement does not wash under the light of day. Store shelves are full and prices are only up 25% in 2 years -- not 3 or 4 times. Gasoline has dropped back to $3.39 a gallon. The U.S. homeless rate is one of the lowest in the world and in case you have not noticed, the "invisible" homeless have never been mentioned in any political debate. The crime rate has been falling every year since 2010. Aside from being too liberal, U.S. schools are some of the best in the world. A million Chinese people spend their own hard-earned money every year to come here and study American technology. Do the Chinese go to Venezuela to study Venezuelan technology? No. No one is going to blame Biden for a train wreck -- that is not a presidential responsibility. Friend you may believe that America is buried in problems and turmoil that could be used as fodder in an election campaign -- but I can assure you that the average American doesn't. You are suggesting that the Biden administration effected regime change in Ukraine in 2014 so that they would have a bogeyman to point to TEN YEARS LATER. Not a chance that happened. And if you will check the movie, the REPUBLICAN Bush is in the movie. The coup would have had to be agreed to by both democrats and Republicans or it could not have happened. It would have had to be a U.S. policy thing. Not something used by only one party to create a "bogeyman" for an election. You are gasping at straws with a conspiracy theory made of swiss cheese and styrofoam. And even if the United States did set up Putin as a "bogeyman" that would be no threat to Russia whatsoever. All of the resultant action ends up taking place in a U.S. election campaign -- not on Russian territory. What I am looking for is a SOLID SUBSTANTIAL REASON the United States wants anything that Russia has so that they would be considered "threatening Russia" by effecting regime change in Ukraine. The British empire was after spices, the Spanish conquistadors were looking for gold, the Dutch just wanted to trade with everybody and get rich, Hitler wanted Ukraine's abundant wheat fields to feed Germans and eventually attacked Russia to get control of their oil fields. What precious commodity does Russia have that the United States Congress would vote to declare war on Russia and take the big guns into Russia and kill a million Russian citizens and take? What do we want that Russia has? Think about that and give me a real answer.
    3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1