Comments by "" (@Tozu25) on "Fireship" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 8
  3. 6
  4. 6
  5. 5
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43.  @eeriemyxi  I'm not an AI expert, and I don't know that much about them. I do know the next things for a fact however: It couldn't fix my code: I gave it 50 lines of Javascript, for context, youtube has about 5 million lines of code. (the problem in my code was a lowercase "p" instead of uppercase), I ran the code through 5 times, copy pasted. Not working. Then i start my normal manual debugging. Took me 3 minutes to find out. So i don't believe it's ready yet. In a long time. Also if it did things correctly 99% of time in the future, still, it would need to be checked. Now this won't require as many people at one project, but allows people to make even more websites, there is need, but they cost a large amount of money (talking about complex websites for big and mid level firms), depending on needs. So, if ai can do the writing, then programmers fix the hardest parts and run through the code bugs and problems and there are a ton of them, then there's more sites faster, and the price goes down. When price is down, demand goes up. To be honest, I believe you as well run all the time into many sites that should be updated, or completely remade. You know that would give a lot of work. 2: When I had my paid sick leave last time, I was diagnosed by an AI. So saying it can't take doctors' jobs is kind of past behind already. The real doctor only read the chat between me and the chatbot, and signed the digital document. This is already making the amount of doctors smaller. And i live in Finland, Europe. One of the most regulated countries in the world with things like healthcare, and strict laws. 3. Coding compared to architecture is essentially: Know the code(or know the math formulas), think of the order you should do it (or think where does your houses blueprints begin), get detailed info from your "user" (get detailed metrics for the new house, colors, etc), save the data (apply your height, and other stuff), know the programming language (or know the words used in architecture, and the math combined to it), complete this in order and the outcome is, well, what it can do... If you get what you want you get your working program, or blueprints that are calculated so, that they would be possible to build. Not possible right now for either one though. I would like to ask, what is the difference of my example between coders and architects? If I go ask gpt4 to make blueprints and construction guides for a small house for me, do you promise to me that it will not provide it?
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70.  @eeriemyxi  First of all, I never said that AI would take every job and no one would have money. I said that it would take jobs = unemployment rates get higher. I’m not an AI expert, and you can clearly see that. But are you denying the fact that if AI can program (know the code, do the functions, analyze data, do the math etc all that stuff) what is stopping it from not being able to design a house like an architech, or create a new machine like engineers? OpenAI is investing billions trying to make an AGI and who knows, maybe even an ASI? However, when chatGTPs next version comes (or just use gpt4), why couldn’t it do math and design to produce the outcome? If it can code me a good looking calculator, (even now) I guess it could also create me an architechtural paper of a described (small) building, or a small described engineered machine. (Haven’t tried, but I know it would) You know more, about this topic, I am eager to know. What’s the difference in telling chatGPT ”Hey, design me a calculator website” versus ”Hey, design me a single room house with blueprints” or ”Hey, design me an earplug with bluetooth”? Edit: And I know a conscious AI doesn’t exist, but the progress pace is worryingly fast, and soon it might. I hope there’s gonna be a problem so big that it will never be created, but who knows. Now since you know more, I’d like to know, why this conscious being couldn’t start teaching itsself from internet, and possibly get out of hand? Being conscious, it would likely do this in silence. When we realize, it is prob. too late. Current AI is a great tool. ASI and AGI are too good. They go over our intelligence (if ever created).
    1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87.  @mrX666-s9p  I wasn't talking about your business. Or anyone's business. I was only talking about OpenAI, and if OpenAI gets something like this project done, where they have invested billions they are also going to run it. And that's all it takes, if the intelligence has access to the internet then the ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) can learn and do anything, the thing is that we don't know what it would do. We don't know what will happen, but with a higher intelligence, likely learning at a speed humans can't even understand. I have a feeling it's not necessarily only going to be good things... Right now you can choose to use this tool, I use it sometimes, and many do, but there might be a time when no one asks your business, the AI just moves around the internet like a file. So maybe if you misread my previous comment, don't go talking about someone or in this case me, being dumb. I was talking about an "AI equally as smart as a human", now does one exist right now? No, it doesn't. And that's where your reading abilities stopped you from understanding my comment. I was talking about the FUTURE. Now you know. So don't go ahead of yourself. People are not the brightest on average, but usually the ones calling others dumb, are dumb themselves because first: they don't understand something (my sentence, in this example), and to them it means that it "isn't possible", or "doesn't make sense", or they start talking about something completely different (like their business, in this case), in reality the only problem is your own intelligence, you don't understand what is being presented to you, so you are not going to get it, and after that you answer with one of those, or something else.
    1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91.  @juanjosefarina  Why are you making stuff up now? I never said that I am against technology, or that I would like to go 600 years back in time or that I wouldn’t know what it was in the middle ages, it was the worst period in history. Then you start talking about their lifestyle man wtf had that got to do with this topic? And if my wish was to work in manual labor as you said, then I wouldn’t even think about AI now, so do some thinking, and you figure out fairly quick why I care about these computer jobs here getting lost, getting the idea? Ill help, it’s because I would like to work in them😮. Also not all tech advance improves life, did the nukes on Japan improve something, or the ones nowadays? No. I simply told you the risks of a theory about a superintelligent AI that researchers and many famous smart people have said to watch out for. Nothing else. You seemed to ignore that and start talking about something else. Either you understood that you finally got my point, or you didn’t understand anything and now you are making stuff up. Do your research, watch science videos about this ”ASI” (Artificial Super Intelligence) and educate yourself, if you didn’t understand my super detailed and logical explanation on how a theoretic superintelligence with consciousness could work, which OpenAI is aiming for (we don’t know if it’s gonna be a good or a bad being) Don’t be blind, educate yourself. Show some arguments and facts or even theories with some logic.
    1