Comments by "Kair Idon" (@kairidon3363) on "Critics blast Arizona, Nevada: 'Don't need weeks to count votes'" video.

Proof?
5
@lorigarza9971 You don't have to prove a negative. Why don't you prove that Trump isn't a hybrid alien-robot?
4
@osakarose5612 Florida messed up big-time in 2000 and are now redeeming themselves. Nevada and Arizona don't care enough to go faster.
4
Where's the proof, Qultist?
2
Any proof? Any proof? No. Ok, then. Let's move on, Qultists. Or do you want to spend the next 2 years crying again?
2
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto needs to win just 55 percent of the outstanding ballots to beat Laxalt, and there are an estimated 95,000 votes still yet to be counted, largely in areas where Cortez Masto has been winning more than 60 percent of the vote. There’s a very real, mathematically possible way for Cortez Masto to win, and suggesting otherwise is misleading.
2
Since, always. There's a reason states legally don't have to report their final vote totals for weeks after the election.
2
@PlutoniumMuncher69 All talk, no proof. Classic Qultist behavior.
2
@Morrisonsgirlfriendforever1971 No. No, we aren't. We're seeing states that are slow to count. Do you have any proof otherwise?
2
@Scumbagballless Because the situation was too hairy?
2
2020, you mean how the Republicans lose and then spend years crying about it?
1
Do you also pray for Herschel to pay more women to get abortions?
1
@SpicyD-123 How?
1
@peterjackson7473 That's your "proof"? You do understand that the states conduct their elections differently (as they're allowed to do), right? Actually, California is known for taking a long time with their counting, you Qultists just never care, because it can be projected (predicted) that the Dem will win. They don't finish counting, they're just easy to predict.
1
@peterjackson7473 Also, they're not "stalling" the count. They're counting and the results are released in batches. If you actually care to stop being a sheep and look at reality, I would recomend you take a look at the fivethirtyeight live blog.
1
@peterjackson7473 I've watched it. Here's the response I've given multiple times already. (You sheep all Bah! the same way.) The crux of it is a lot of magical "estimation". If you don't know, most documentaries have evidence to back up their claims, which is why they can make a difference. When you ask these people for actual proof, they have none. (I've previously seen their interviews.) This movie is just wishful thinking and scary music. I'm sad that you guys are so easily tricked. There are some people who made strong claims, but they drop like flies before it gets to court. We've already seen this before. So, yeah, anybody can make a claim. I saw bigfoot vote, really, I would go in front of a judge and say it, really. If they actually have proof, bring it to a judge, but that's right. They never will. They make more money if they keep people like you hyped up on a myth.
1
@peterjackson7473 It's taking longer in Nevada, because they count votes recieved after election day, as long as it's been postmarked by election day. (They have to wait to see if they're are addition votes, especially military votes.) These later votes are less predictable and can make a difference in a close race, that's why news organizations are hessitant to project a winner.
1
@peterjackson7473 Which brings me to my earlier point. The crux of the entire thing was magical "estimation" without any concrete evidence.
1
@peterjackson7473 If you disagree, send me a link to any arrests, any court cases, ANYTHING that arose from the "documentary". You can't because there are none. The director himself basically stated that he didn't have proof of anything, he made the film to make other people try to find proof.
1
@Morrisonsgirlfriendforever1971 I wish we could stop using that term, but you Qultists have so many crazy conspiracy theories. Why can't you guys live in reality?
1
@keithm9337 Many liberals say they think the country is headed in the wrong direction, because they see the growing authoritarianism of the Republicans. These liberals will still vote Democratic. So, no. It really isn't proof.
1
@lorigarza9971 So, he is a hybrid alien-robot? Cool.
1
@heatherellis8566 Proof?
1
Cool. Is Nevada in WV? States are allowed to run their own elections. Why not take longer? No one cares too much except for the Qultists.
1
Didn' Kemp have the same situation? Don't remember you Qultists whining about that.
1
@heaven-is-real Hahaha! Sure thing, bud.😂😂Keep crying, Qultist.
1
@heaven-is-real Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto needs to win just 55 percent of the outstanding ballots to beat Laxalt, and there are an estimated 95,000 votes still yet to be counted, largely in areas where Cortez Masto has been winning more than 60 percent of the vote. There’s a very real, mathematically possible way for Cortez Masto to win, and suggesting otherwise is misleading.
1
Do you have any shred of proof? Anything?
1
@KevinHoekman A 10 year old would still be smarter than you.
1
Proof? You Qultists never have any proof.
1
Meh, it's cool. I don't really care if it takes a while. No one except for you Qultists are having a meltdown.
1
Choosing to deny reality... Good strategy.
1
@Acesahn What happened in 2000?
1
@Scumbagballless Yeah. What does that say about the Republicans? Sad.
1
Yep. They just want to trigger you Qultists.
1
@CRaZy Eyed Ignorant Liberals Really? Is it difficult to believe that PA didn't want a New Jersey snake oil salesman who fights for Turkey over America to represent them?
1
@The sun will come out tomorrow Who's really weird? Matt Gaetz pays children for "fun". A Republican was caught jerking it outside the preschool. Roy Moore... Jim Jordan likes to turn a blind eye to abuse...
1
@d.gillis9660 What?? Yes, I want proof. I don't have to prove a negative. Do you want to prove that Trump isn't an alien-robot hybrid?
1
@The sun will come out tomorrow Yeah, honey. It's true.
1
@d.gillis9660 Prove that Tucker Carlson isn't an Argentinian Spy from Mars.
1
@Scumbagballless Because Sam was too Wise?
1
@jackmurdock5723 If you come with an accusation, you come with proof. Otherwise the other person has to prove the absence of ridiculous things. The burden of proof is on you to show the Dems are cheating.
1
@afolabitoye4393 Yes. He said the counting may take weeks. And it might. How long did it take in 2000? What do you think this is proof of? That Biden is aware that counting can take time?
1