Comments by "Israel Military Channel" (@IsraelMilitaryChannel) on "Kyiv Losing 15 Units In Zaporizhzhia Daily|620 Russian Soldiers Killed|Putin Ally’s Nuclear Threat" video.

Nuclear threats only work if the other party doesn't have them
11
@wolfthorn1 "Threatening to use nukes is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.” - This is the case when both of the nations possesses nukes. Now if only one party has nukes, it is equivalent to say the one with nukes is out of the gasoline with matches while the one without nukes is standing deep in gasoline without matches. You are comparing apples to oranges. Stupidity is a disease.
2
@wolfthorn1 1. If he is crazy, he would have already used nukes. Why is there a time period or a limit to which when he decides to use nukes if he is insane? Stupid. 2. Apples and oranges are different in many ways, different color, different taste. They are not the same. Low IQ detected. Never have I claimed that Russia will not use nukes. Donkey read my comments again. What I did say is that Russia's threats will only work if the other parties doesn't posses nukes. Russia's threats are clearly not working, more weapons with longer range are pouring into Ukraine.
1
@wolfthorn1 The leader of North Korea would never use nukes unless his regime is threatened. Dictators uses nukes to secure their position of power. He has everything he wants. Power, wealth, woman etc.. he wouldn't give these up by launching nukes and getting himself destroyed in the process by Mutual Assured Destruction retaliation. The same with Vlad, as long as his people are content with him and his regime is not threatened, he wouldn't dare use nukes on another nation with nukes. His current saber rattling threats are of no substance. He is just trying his luck to scare the west from sending Ukraine longer range missiles, fighter jets etc.. Where did you get the idea that Vlad is insane? As long as people are dying in his place, things can go on. But with nukes, his life will be on the line including his $200 billion net worth
1
@lordvladimirputin7895 When you say "nuked", do you mean strategic nuke or tactical nuke? If it's tactical nukes, it wouldn't win the war fast because those nukes wouldn't be used in cities and towns and Ukrainians will be entrance in those areas if tactical nukes were used. Have you seen how vast Ukraine's open fields are? With trenches everywhere those tactical nukes wouldn't finish the job. Ukraine's soldiers are spread out in those fields. the closes weapons Russia has to low yield nukes are thermobaric bombs which has proven ineffective in open fields. The moment Russia uses tactical nukes, the war is over. India and China whether they want it or not will stop trading with Russia. Both of them by force will stop buying Russian oil. Now if strategic nukes were used on Ukrainian cities, it contradicts Vlad's stated reason to invade in the first place which is to "free poor Ukrainian population whos government was toppled by the west and a puppet was installed by the west is now running the country". The narrative of Vlad exposes himself. Also it's stupid to nuke the territories you want to invade because of the damage and the reconstruction cost. Also to note, nuking entire cities with civilians, that would mean a massacre. The entire world will completely stop trading with Russia. Today at least China is still trading with North Korea, but if Russia uses nukes, even China will have to stop trading with Russia by force whether they like it or not. "The US and its allies would destroy Russia’s troops and equipment in Ukraine – as well as sink its Black Sea fleet – if the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, uses nuclear weapons in the country, former CIA director and retired four-star army general David Petraeus warned on Sunday." How true is this claim we don't know. After all he is a former retired general no longer in service.
1