Comments by "Jeff Norris" (@jeffnorris8848) on "" video.

Not always. Depends on your quality as well as where you attack.
6
@Someone42527 Exactly. The Germans were quality. You generally need 3:1 if you are of equal quality
2
Bang for your buck. You can find reports and video of such but you hear more of Himars attacking supply and command and control targets deep behind the lines
2
Lol You notice he fails to say where but has a lot of other impressive facts.
2
@dbrown530 Does he have a history of being right, otherwise you are operating on faith.
2
Would not Russia be incurring loses of trained troops and material in these battles that dont matter?
1
@aranos6269 If you look up the Georgian in conflict with the Russians brought large numbers, they suffered less than 200 casualties in 12 days Georgia lost a little bit more than that.
1
@aranos6269 my problem is your use of the word They. If we’re going back in history, they shared a lot about failures and losses in February 1916
1
@aranos6269 that is an over simplification as it does not address various strikes and such that caused the czar to return from the front. Simply put if they don’t care, then they would have no problem acknowledging the losses Unless somehow admitting the losses would change the mind of they
1
@aranos6269 No, you’re just saying they’re all apathetic to themselves and everyone around them
1
Force concentration was a tactic of Alexander as well.
1
Unfortunately they can’t show that they are gaining a benefit from that
1
@dbrown530 M as in millions???? LOl North as in Belarus Russian failed last time. South as in Kherson?? Well we know what happened there recently/
1
@dbrown530 Great, as I pointed out North tried and failed South tried and failed. Which projected offensive has the good colonel been right about recently?
1
Of course the Russians lose trained troops and equipment in the process. So that makes it something like a push
1