Comments by "Theresa Adams" (@theresaadams7143) on "NYT, ZEIT; Pro-Ukraine group blew up Nord Stream. Tbilisi Euromaidan. CNN, Bakhmut open road. U/1" video.

  1. Absolutely, because Germans are asking questions. Olaf is a traitor to the German people. Olaf need to answer to the German people, but will they ever hold him accountable.
    52
  2. Cookie Nuland probably was in the meeting with Brandon in DC. Olaf wringing his hands nervously says the German people are asking questions and he needs cover. So.. cookie Nuland came up with this Nancy story about a pro Ukrainian group who blew up the pipeline. And Olaf says but, how can anyone believe that? Then Brandon said, "trust me we will make people believe the story, we can do it". Olaf grins sheepishly, and left confidently back to Germany. ..lol. .. I can make up a story too. Hahaha!
    48
  3. Well said.
    21
  4. Absolutely, and someone in Germany will eventually spill the beans. The German people should be demanding an explanation from Olaf.
    18
  5. The yacht had a cloak of invisibility they purchased from captain Kirk, of the starship Enterprise. Hahaha!
    12
  6.  @katerina_m6643  this new episode of "who done it" is getting very juicy. Is this the precursor to the disunity of EU/NATO. I hope so, because the fingers are beginning to point.
    8
  7. The pipeline was blown up on Robert Kagan's birthday. Enough said.
    7
  8.  @lixicbre  I bet they left fingerprints and didn't flush the toilet.
    4
  9. This NYT kindergarten story is something Cookie Nuland concocted. She's also a longtime CIA operative with immense authority. She's meddling in Haiti also.
    2
  10. Thanks for the update.
    2
  11. Hahaha!. When you get a knock on your door in the early morning hours, don't be surprised, because the intelligence community needs warm bodies to support their fabricated story.
    2
  12.  @lorainejones41  lol. Spot on! Who's the mystery lady in the yacht?
    1
  13. The NYT story is as well thought out as the endless sanctions on Russia, therefore it will not stand under scrutiny.
    1