General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Dark Jack
TAKASHii
comments

Comments by "Dark Jack" (@darkjack9021) on "What’s it like being a Muslim in Japan ?" video.

And I'm Christian. Love for all human beings. Acceptation of cultural difference. No obligation to be converted. God is kind and good.
4
Islam is not a good thing for Japan (and for the whole world). I hope politics read the Koran (submission, fear, hatred, ...) and will refuse this religion.
4
@khwael1512 I read the Qur'an. I have it. And I don't like your religion because there is no reciprocity. The world needs another thing. It needs love and reciprocity. Have a good day.
3
@Aicha You don't say anyone have to be Muslims but you want it. Because Allah is universal. Once converted, you're trapped. You cannot leave. Sentence is death. And you know it. Your religion is hell. There is no reciprocity. And this is not a good thing for Japan.
2
@AishaJoon You cover yourself because you are afraid of Allah (Islam = submission). Your religion is dangerous and full of frustration
2
I wish the Koran was a text of love and reciprocity (open to others and their cultural differences, instead of converting everyone).
2
@khwael1512 You're trapped inside. Sorry for you!
2
@dania3794 Source : Quran. The official book of all Muslims. Do you know what means Islam? Answer: Submission. There is no love. Just hatred. Once inside, you're trapped. You cannot leave because sentence is death.
2
@newbabies923 You don't understand. Koran has no reciprocity. It's worse. Christianity accept apostasy, not Koran (sentence is death). Christianity shares love, not Koran (fear and pain). Christianity accept atheism, not Koran (you have to convert everyone). Don't confuse Colonialism and Christianity. Read the texts. If you didn't, don't reply.
2
@i.g779 I judge the Koran, a myth created by humans. And I have all the rights because I read it. Thx for your comprehension ;) P.S. : accept the world as it is: many cultures and different visions.
2
Who commit terrorist attacks? Islam = Submission (angry God), no reciprocity, creating instability with others, etc. And you don't see the problem "lol"? Of course, you don't. You are trapped inside. You cannot leave (apostasy would result on death).
2
And why there are terrorist attacks? Because Islam is "fire". There is no love. Just read the Koran.
2
So true.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 "islam never teaches reciprocity" Finally! You admit it. "it's lack of reciprocity from side of other groups." Reciprocity doesn't work like this. Each religion place a cursor for reciprocity. The cursor of reciprocity in Islam is very weak. And what are the consequences? Instability with others cultures. It works like this. The more reciprocity is high, the less instability is. You can find three types of reciprocity: Positive reciprocity: being tolerant with every cultures, and no violence. All of us Negative reciprocity: law of retaliation (an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth). Us and Them. Non-reciprocity: Others are problems because they aren't like us. Us vs Them. Sorry but Al Queada, Isis, Taliban are Muslims. They read Qur'an and justify their actions with Qur'an (warrior verses & Jihad). Indeed, the majority of victims of theirs attacks are Muslims. It's true. And they don't care. Because Allah allowed fear and war, if necessary. They interpret this vision to punish "lost Muslims" and to apply a radical Islam. I agree with you: they are dangerous. The world needs love and reciprocity. Sorry again... What is the common point between Stalin, Hitler, Benito, etc.? Answer: Non-reciprocity in their ideology.
1
@baderabduallah3311 ❤
1
"As they say all Japanese people are nice ,well mannered and have soft corner for all religions." The same cannot be said for Muslims...
1
@f.h5696 When you read a religion, you study inside ;) And being an outsider in parallel is a good way to keep lucidity and understand. Thing that can't do a believer.
1
@alias2967 The pb is all religion aren't tolerant. That's what I'm telling. Read the Qur'an. And you'll see.
1
@mazzdacon2134 Can you be quiet with your religion? Thank you. By the way, Islam = submission, no reciprocity, converted the others, frustration, etc. So be nice and accept cultural differences. Oh, I forgot. You can't. Because the others are the problem... and not your book.
1
@f.h5696 I analyse Qur'an. That's all. Just read it.
1
@f.h5696 What a beautiful text of submission to God and none reciprocity, isn't it?
1
There is no racism, dude. The pb is strangers see racism everywhere because they are themselves intolerant. Especially Muslims.
1
@lenasmovingcastle Islam is intolerant. Read Koran.
1
I read the Quran. And... it's a intolerant religion most of the time. There is no reciprocity. That's the problem.
1
@fallasleep9472 It's important for all societies. Because there is no reciprocity in the Qur'an.
1
@f.h5696 The context doesn't change the law itself. You just understand the "why". The application is still the same. And it doesn't change the fact that there is no reciprocity.
1
@baderabduallah3311 Of course because Islam means submission. And it's universal. You hate unbelievers. The world doesn't need that. There is no reciprocity in Islam. I'm an analyst. Nothing else.
1
@f.h5696 I read the Qur'an. That's your argument? lol.
1
@ak-t7d6f If everyone read the Koran, all non-Muslims would become Islamophobic. Everything is based on submission, fear, conversion of the other, refusal of cultural difference, etc. Next time study their cultural encoding a bit before protecting this religion from non-reciprocity which creates instability of cohabitation in foreign countries, especially in the West.
1
@Takashii This is what contains Islam. Read it, please. 2-6, 7 But the Unbelievers do not believe, whether thou warnest them or not, they will never believe. Allah has sealed their hearts and their ears, and a thick veil covers their sight, and for them is a great punishment. 2-40: O children of Israel, remember My blessing with which I have blessed you. If you keep your commitments to Me. I will keep mine. And it is I whom you should fear. 2-106: If We abrogate any verse or cause it to be forgotten, We bring a better one, or one like it. Knowest thou not that Allah is Omnipotent? Explanation: Locked religion. No criticism. 2-161, 162 &163 Those who disbelieve and die disbelieving, will receive the curse of Allah from the angels and from all men. They will dwell therein forever; the punishment will not be lightened for them, nor will they be given respite. And your Godhead is one Godhead. There is no god but He, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. 47-3, 5 & 8 This is so because those who disbelieved followed the false and those who believed followed the Truth from their Lord. This is how Allah offers their examples to people. When you meet (in battle) those who disbelieve, strike their neck. Then when you have overcome them, bind them firmly. Then it is either free release or ransom, until the war lays down its burdens. So it is, for if Allah wills. He Himself would take vengeance on them, but it is to test one another. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will never make their deeds vain. He will guide them and improve their condition. And as for those who disbelieve, there will be an evil for them, and He will make their deeds vain. 47-36 The present life is but play and amusement; whereas if you believe and fear Allah, He will grant you your rewards and will not ask you for your possessions.
1
Being tolerant toward an intolerant religion is a joke.
1
@godspell. Taqiya detected.
1
@khwael1512 I judge religion on their reciprocity. Each myth, each religion, each culture places a cursor: "How I consider others?" The problem with Islam is there is no reciprocity. In consequence, it creates instabilities. That's why I don't like Islam (not Muslims), essentially a warrior and conquest religion.
1
@khwael1512 Don't confuse Christianity and Old Testament, neither Christianity and Church. You can't find non-reciprocity in Christianity (I'm waiting if you find it). Atheism is not a religion. Don't confuse humanity (aggressive specie and colonial) and religion. I'm talking about religion as a system. It's funny you justify non-reciprocity in Islam by comparisons... Here some verses, in Qur'an. Tell me, this is reciprocity? No. 2-6, 7 But the Unbelievers do not believe, whether thou warnest them or not, they will never believe. Allah has sealed their hearts and their ears, and a thick veil covers their sight, and for them is a great punishment. 2-40: O children of Israel, remember My blessing with which I have blessed you. If you keep your commitments to Me. I will keep mine. And it is I whom you should fear. 2-106: If We abrogate any verse or cause it to be forgotten, We bring a better one, or one like it. Knowest thou not that Allah is Omnipotent? Explanation: Locked religion. No criticism. 2-161, 162 &163 Those who disbelieve and die disbelieving, will receive the curse of Allah from the angels and from all men. They will dwell therein forever; the punishment will not be lightened for them, nor will they be given respite. And your Godhead is one Godhead. There is no god but He, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. 47-3, 5 & 8 This is so because those who disbelieved followed the false and those who believed followed the Truth from their Lord. This is how Allah offers their examples to people. When you meet (in battle) those who disbelieve, strike their neck. Then when you have overcome them, bind them firmly. Then it is either free release or ransom, until the war lays down its burdens. So it is, for if Allah wills. He Himself would take vengeance on them, but it is to test one another. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will never make their deeds vain. He will guide them and improve their condition. And as for those who disbelieve, there will be an evil for them, and He will make their deeds vain. 47-36 The present life is but play and amusement; whereas if you believe and fear Allah, He will grant you your rewards and will not ask you for your possessions.
1
@khwael1512 What a beautiful religion! Submission, fear and non-reciprocity. Mankind doesn't need that, sorry. Of course, you're telling Islam is more accepting because you want everyone converted. I'm tolerant, but not toward intolerance.
1
Christianity and tolerance for every difference cultures <3
1
@khwael1512 I don't want to tell (my privacy). I'm here to understand and analysis.
1
@khwael1512 Jesus = the New Testament, in case you don't know. What does the New Testament mean? A New Alliance between God and humans, this time universal. The philosophy of the new text supersedes the old one. Please study at least the Christian theology, instead of being clever and confusing everything (Islam makes a lot of confusion about the actors of Christianity. Would Mohammed have been mistaken in his great wisdom?). Christianity has a reciprocity, what we could call, "positive": turning the other cheek in the face of violence (to cut the ground from under the foot). Indeed, the Old Testament is based on the Law of Retaliation (very violent). No passage in the New Testament calls for contempt for unbelievers, unlike Islam (about 600 verses). Find me one passage in the New Testament. Just one. The author of Christianity is Saint Paul for your general culture, not the Church. The Church is only its institutional form incapable of correctly applying Christ's message of "perfect" reciprocity: love one another, and be tolerant of everything, including intolerance (the weak point of Christianity). To understand how a culture thinks, you can methodologically take its founding myth, see the reciprocity in it, and analyze it. You can contextualize all you want, Islam does not deal with reciprocity. You will not find it because it does not exist. Monotheism should have seen the appearance of 1) Islam (non-reciprocity), Judaism (negative reciprocity), Christianity (positive reciprocity). The appearance of Islam in the last position is a regression towards reciprocity. As a matter of fact, Muslim countries have been characterized in their history by their inability to establish links with the outside world. Even today, this is a sorry spectacle. In short, Islam is a locked religion. And that is why it is so effective, but also unstable when other cultures cohabit with it. Sincerely yours. PS : lol.
1
@khwael1512 Next time, be nice ;)
1
Too bad Muslim countries don't do the same, huh.
1
@abdullahalamrikani678 Why? You're afraid of your own religion? Submission... Converted... War... Come on, we know what Islam is: no openness to cultural difference, no reciprocity. In one word: garbage.
1
@khwael1512 Indeed, you're ignorant and submitted. Definition of "slave".
1
And why you just don't adapt yourself? Always the same thing with Muslims: the problem is the others. No openness at all.
1
You should live in a Muslim country or do an apostasy. Tolerance with non-muslims and Islam are not compatibles.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 They try to convert them. Because there is no reciprocity in Koran.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 You know like me that it's better to convert non-Muslims. The Prophet wrote it. Because Islam is the universal truth. There is no massive reports because it's clever: weddings, make friends, taqiya. It's happening. But the problem is no there. The problem is there is no reciprocity in Islam. Only Submission and fear of God. And the sentence for apostasy is death. Dare to tell the opposite. EDIT: You take advantage of the tolerance of other cultures to implement and slowly convert.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 You don't understand: Islam don't treat the reciprocity in the Koran. It creates an inflammatory cohabitation instability with other cultures. There is none tolerance for "other culture". You know that Allah is a hatred divinity. Submission is in fear. All critics are locked. Just read your "holy" text. P.S.: People don't choose religion. There is no choice. All is cultural. The world would be better off without Islam (Muslims first). The World needs love and reciprocity, not hate and rejection. P.S. number 2 : I'm not a believer. I'm past the age of believing silly stories.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 You read more without understanding what you read. WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. It's funny how you dodge the non-reciprocity of Islam. "Pure divinity", it's fake. Just a belief. You accuse the others because you are unable to critic your own thought. I don't blame you. You're a blind and submissive victim. And you play the victim instead of facing the problems of Islam: zero reciprocity, cultural differences are problematic, etc. In this case, the others are necessarily problematic. Thank you to show us you real face. "If quran tells Allah is god then that's the truth and especially for those who are following it and without islam the World would be at worst. Maybe it's the atheism which caused multiple issues and conflicts than other religions." Tell that to women and little girls in Afghanistan. What a beautiful religion! Islam is the Middle Ages of ethics and morality. It is an incendiary warlike thought. Nothing else.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 The tolerance of intolerance is over.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 My job is to study myths and religions. Historically, Islam is based less on a revelation than on an inability to connect with the outside world. The Koran does not deal with the subject of reciprocity. It is an inflammatory text that creates an instability of cohabitation as soon as it lives in proximity to another culture. Unluckily, a human group has invented a religion devoid of love and open-mindedness towards the rest of the world. And you are part of it. Indirectly. Unfortunately. If you are really interested in humanity itself, outside of Islam and taqiya, that is, as a human being, show it. Condemn the attacks (for once).
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Never forget: you're one culture among others. Not the (chosen) ONE.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 " Indeed as a muslim i will respect your culture or can be part of any culture but it doesn't mean I will follow those teachings of culture which is wrong and not even permissible in islam." All is the problem is here. You can't integrate others cultures because they're wrong, from your point of view. So you create instability. Don't make me laugh, history shows us what Islam is: a pervert and locked religion. China salutes your people.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Do you condemn terrorist attacks in the name of Islam? Do you condemn Taliban in Afghanistan?
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 War is war, dear Sameera. There are always innocent victims. But yes, I condemn American invasion. All was a lie. For China, it's more complicated. They don't appreciate religions. They treat the situation on their way. As always. I fear that the West will turn its gaze to the East, and be inspired by it. Because, as I said, Islam poses tensions of cohabitation (and the tolerance of intolerance is over). That is a fact. It is sad to say. Take care of yourself. I stand by my position. There is nothing more to say.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 There have always been tensions between humans, religions or not. Atheism has nothing to do with it. It is more ethnocentrism, fear of the other and aggressiveness. Besides, atheism is recent in the history of humanity. People have often gone to war in the name of their religion, including Christianity (supposedly the religion of love). The challenge today is to build a global harmony. Hence the need for reciprocity. And the problem is that the Qur'an does not address this. It's factual. That's why I criticize the text. The difficulty is that believers are attached to the text, more or less faithfully. There are variations. The proof: you. Take care of yourself. The world doesn't submission and fear. It needs love and peace.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Bla bla bla bla bla bla. "Also, quran addresses the problems of cultures and don't force people to accept a particular culture. That's actually a factual thing and people like this part of quran." The problems of cultures? So others are problems? This part of quran against many Surahs of hatred and intolerance, like pouring boiling oil on the unbelievers. I can write it of you want (I have the Quran). For 1 good part, you have 10 intolerant parts. All the problem is here. You know why? Because Islam is born during conquests and wars, with an universal vision.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 I forget, you're an anthropologist and an expert who knows every historians. You're losing your time. You're submitted to a religion without reciprocity. "About the negative and positive, for me i have accepted all verses and for you there are multiple good verses for Such harsh verses and i can quote that for you" No, you can't. The good passages are very few. You will find yourself cornered very quickly. I have History on my side ;) Islam has always developed a surprising attitude in its inability to forge reciprocal links with other cultures. Your answers confirm this analysis. China is resolving the problem (they want harmony, not a fire ethos). Remember : the tolerance of intolerance is over.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 "I guess you are forgetting it's islam only which fought against racism, classism, casteism in its core teachings and reciprocity issues lies within Atheism and history proved that too." Tell that to little Afghans girls. By the way, considering the boring and emotional length of your comments, you are making a diversion as if to drown the fish. To have such a cultural capital and such an ignorance about Islam, it is still the height of it. We'll put it down to taqiya. The day you will go around the Muslim countries, you will review your copy. How naive your vision is. "It's the fault of atheism. My religion is perfect. No, I don't want anyone to criticize my belief (even if it is true) :(" Your religion does not deal with reciprocity. That is a fact. Read your ****ing text written by a pedo-/phi-/le warrior. And you defend it? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Oh you're a student. That explains everything. Your thinking is still weak and soft. When you will have a little more judgement (you may be 18 years old and have the beginnings of a frightened sexuality), you will understand a little better. You have not the level. Go back to your revisions. And deflate your ego.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Go back to your revisions, kid. I don't talk with immature spirits who has difficulties to connect "eyes" to "brain". You don't even know what "logic" is (Aristotle... Syllogism... inclusion of premises with medium-term... adequacy of empiric experiences with words...). See, hum? Logic is knowledge. Don't confuse your pretended intelligence with logic. Read and be quiet, next time. Your capital is still weak. You're not a genius. Not at all.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Don't use "savage psychoanalysis" on me. It doesn't work. I help everyone who deserve it. But intolerant humans or cultures deserve nothing, only strength, law and fight (and death if necessary). Like Islam. The future of mankind is China. You know why? Because West is too tolerant and depressive. Islam is intolerant and too "Middle-age". Africa is too corrupted and "under control" of superpowers. Russia is crazy.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Intelligence without lucidity is useless, dear Sameera. Edit: how can you judge the level of philosophy of someone if you don't speak it? What is philosophy, Sameera? I'ill tell you what is. Philosophy is, among other things, an aspiration to knowledge. Plato's Socrates describes in the "Trial" that the source of knowledge lies within us, in other words the physical world. We do not have to rely on the metaphysical world for this. As a consequence, humans must also rely on their physical strength, not on metaphysical strength. In short, what Socrates teaches us is "let's build your world". Be ethical.The answer is within you. Question for you, because you're so clever and know everything. What is the main difference between Plato and Aristotle, his pupil? I'm waiting. And what is the main difference between the philosophy of Greece and China? Both of which appeared at about the same time, in the 4th century BC. And what concept is absent from Chinese philosophy today? (clue: psychology).
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Psychoanalysis is a process (not a science). It aims at two major objectives: consolation and a gain of personal lucidity. Roughly speaking, psychoanalysis is a historical psychology. Freud's contribution with this discipline is that the human subject is torn between his body (unconscious) and his speech (imagination or consciousness). In other words, the seat of the will is the body inhabited by impulses and a personal history. I don't think I'm wrong, eh. lol. Your insistence on atheism proves that you have understood nothing about human beings. War was present long before. Islam is even built on it: a warlike and conquering religion. A magnificent machine to assimilate in reverse. Oh, you gonna cry?
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 I'm already relishing your future comments written in the heat of the moment that responds completely out of character. Come on, I'm waiting for your copy and paste "You are poor in philosophy, psychology, etc." From someone who is incapable of answering simple philosophical basics and is going to come across like a ** to my definition of psychoanalysis. WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. You're wasting your time. You lose. Conclusion : Islam is intolerant. And you're a submissive victim who thinks she is smart because she goes to college. But unable to connect the dots to understand the world around her, and suffering from a lack of knowledge. You are not able to tell me the difference between Greek and Chinese philosophy, nor between Plato and Aristotle. I can't even imagine if I ask you about the status of mathematics in physics. WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. What a noob, Sameera.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Get out, now.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Freud saw psychonalysis as a scientist (scientism). Not a hermeunetic approach. Not at all. This discipline is individual and universal. Individual means = the story of the subject and his problems. He is looking for consolation. That's why we can see psychoanalysis as a "historical psychology of the subject". Universal = the unconscious, the body. Here comes lucidity. We're animals with instincts (libido). If you have not understood the importance of the tear, you have not understood anything about psychoanalysis. And you are doing useless and interminable therapies. Also, you can use psychoanalysis in therapy and as a epistemological vision (all human sciences are Freudian. Few examples: Durkheim, Levi-Strauss, Bourdieu, Libet, even Artificial Intelligence like Anella). My teacher is psychoanalyst. He was the pupil of Jacques Lacan. Maybe you know that name, I'm pretty sure. It's good to have a little knowledge. Now it's about developing your sensitivity and intelligence to the size of your readings. But also, connect the dotted lines together. You've pulled out a premade university course on psychoanalysis. It's not very good. You don't have the level, yet. PS: Yeah, and Freud took some drugs, too.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Yes, Islam is tolerant like Quran said: Take the infidels and pour boiling oil on their skin. Islam will be their new skin. Very tolerant indeed. And the famous sura: save a man is save all mankind. If and only if this man does not contravene the sacred law of the Koran, which, let's remember, is to convert and submit humans to the will of Allah the Great, the Merciful. Do you know that in Egypt and other Muslim countries, the Koran is not applied in full? Read this text and accept the conclusion of Claude Lévi-Strauss (1955): Islam is characterized less by a revelation of divine order than by its historical incapacity to weave links with the outside. Translation: the Qur'an does not address the issue of reciprocity. Consequence: this creates an instability of coexistence as soon as a Muslim community lives abroad. It is not a coincidence that attacks take place. It is no coincidence that China is taking action. It's not a coincidence that Western countries look down on all this. We don't have to be tolerant of an intolerant religion in its entirety. You are an exception. Don't forget that. The day when the Islamists will take you, you know what they will say to you? You are not faithfully following the Quran." And they will make you read the passages I quote (over 600 suras of rejection and hatred). The Koran is a law. We have to apply them.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 600 non-reciprocity ideas, I mean (my bad). 600 in 114 surahs... It's enormous. You can't deny it. Of course, it's one of the fastest religion in west: submission, conversion, submission, Poverty, submission. Anthropology had classed Islam as a non-reciprocity religion. Continue to play innocent victim.Tolerance of the intolerance is over.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Caring about the Uyghurs is like caring about the Nazis. I don't care about non-reciprocity. Because non-reciprocity is the source of the problem in the story.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 It's not a question of atheism or religion, it's just common sense. The world should not support the cultural intolerance of a few. And if we have to get rid of it, we do. Especially if it's an intolerant religion.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 And Try to understand Freud when you read it + his correspondence. Study. Study. Study. But understanding is better! I don't see other forces in human beings. Only libido. Why we're eating? Taking force to reproduce. "God"? An invention to give sense around us. There is no metaphysical forces. War? Maybe a demographic regulation of our specie. "Love"? The other name of libido 'Eros". "Death"? Not a force. Just a phenomenon. I don't trust in "Thanos", except if Thanos is the regulation by war.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 All discipline has a metaphysical fondation. Because all discipline has a "gravity of questions" around an object. The object here is "unconscious". Of course, this metaphysical fondation is an aspiration to build knowledge and not to maintain the mystery. Stop being stupid. You're not stupid.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 You can't tell the others forces. Why? Ignorance? Ego? Fear? Defend your position. Otherwise you will not convince anyone. The best way to convince someone (in good faith) is to demonstrate it.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 But Freud poses some questions on "unconscious". He poses tropisms, etc. It's metaphysical in that way. On the other hand, he talks like a philosopher: answers are inside the subject. But he needs help. And the way to find the solution is language : he needs to hear himself speak. You talk about feelings and emotions. Indeed, the psychoanalyst will trace the emotional thread back to the responsible event, which the patient sometimes evades. Freud had a very nice formula about this (it was about the taboo): a walker who has to make a long detour because there is a lake on the way. The psychoanalyst is to see what is underneath this lake that blocks the passage and causes a lot of trouble. Metaphysics is quite simple to summarize: what is [object]? Science or philosophy is to build on this questioning a solid knowledge. And of course from an approach & empiric reality & experimentation, etc. Psychoanalysis is an individual and historical approach. But we are governed by the same mechanisms. It does not mean that all individuals are the same. Not at all. It's a new investigation each time. But it is precisely an investigation each time.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Reproduction is life. EDIT: and the art (life support). Of course.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 And this conception of the human subject, i.e. the split between imagination (consciousness) and body (unconscious), Chinese philosophy does not have it. The concept of unconscious does not exist in China. That was my previous question.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 You show the perfect face of Islam "This book is the best one", "Since the beginning you're the only one who is humiliating himself". No reciprocity. Thank you for the demonstration. All I said was calculated. Thank you for the experimentation.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Sura 109, (Early period, mekkan) Mohammed was weak, he had only a few followers at that time. Muslims in minority. Proclaiming peace and tolerance. Verse 6 "For you is your religion, and for me is my religion." Sura 2, (middle period, medinian, shortly after the hijra) Mohammed grew stronger. Proclaiming defensive Djihad. Only fight if you get attacked or someone insult lslam or Mohammed: Verses 190-193 "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors. And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. And if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Fight them until there is no [more] fitnah and [until]) worship is lacknowledged to bel for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors." Sura 9, (the last one of the large suras in the Quran. Written after Mohammed conquered Mekkah) Muslims in majority. Final commands, abrogating the earliers. Proclaiming offensive Djihad. Fight those who dont believe in Allah, just because they dont believe in Allah. Verses 29-31 "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - (fight) urntil they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded? They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him." The later abrogates the earlier: Quran 2,106 We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent? Quran 16,101 And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse - and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down - they say, "You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies]" But most of them do not know. Narrated lbn Umar: Allah's Messenger () said: have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Messenger (), and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah." Reference: Sahih al-Bukhari 25In-book reference: Book 2, Hadith 18USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol.1, Book 2, Hadith 25 (deprecated numbering scheme) While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet () came out and said, "Let us go to the Jews" We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." Reference: Sahih al-Bukhari 3167In-book reference: Book 58, Hadith 9USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 4, Book 53, Hadith 392 (deprecated numbering scheme) narrated abu huraira: the verse:--"you (true muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace lslam. usc-msa web (english) reference: vol. 6, book 60, hadith 80arabic reference: book 65, hadith 4557 It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbas said: "The Messenger of Allah [SAw] said: Whoever changes his religion, kill him!" Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference: Sunan an-Nasai 4061 In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 96English translation :Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4066 Bonus: 2-6, 7 But the Unbelievers do not believe, whether thou warnest them or not, they will never believe. Allah has sealed their hearts and their ears, and a thick veil covers their sight, and for them is a great punishment. 2-40: O children of Israel, remember My blessing with which I have blessed you. If you keep your commitments to Me. I will keep mine. And it is I whom you should fear. 2-106: If We abrogate any verse or cause it to be forgotten, We bring a better one, or one like it. Knowest thou not that Allah is Omnipotent? Explanation: Locked religion. No criticism. 2-161, 162 &163 Those who disbelieve and die disbelieving, will receive the curse of Allah from the angels and from all men. They will dwell therein forever; the punishment will not be lightened for them, nor will they be given respite. And your Godhead is one Godhead. There is no god but He, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. 47-3, 5 & 8 This is so because those who disbelieved followed the false and those who believed followed the Truth from their Lord. This is how Allah offers their examples to people. When you meet (in battle) those who disbelieve, strike their neck. Then when you have overcome them, bind them firmly. Then it is either free release or ransom, until the war lays down its burdens. So it is, for if Allah wills. He Himself would take vengeance on them, but it is to test one another. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will never make their deeds vain. He will guide them and improve their condition. And as for those who disbelieve, there will be an evil for them, and He will make their deeds vain. 47-36 The present life is but play and amusement; whereas if you believe and fear Allah, He will grant you your rewards and will not ask you for your possessions.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 " Claude Lévi-Strauss, anthropologist (1955) (...) I know only too well the reasons for this uneasiness felt in the vicinity of Islam: I find in it the universe from which I come; Islam is the West of the East. More precisely still, I had to meet Islam to measure the peril that threatens French thought today. I do not forgive the first one for presenting me our image, for obliging me to notice how much France is becoming Muslim. (...) If, however, a France of forty-five million inhabitants were to open up widely on the basis of equal rights, in order to admit twenty-five million Muslim citizens, even a large proportion of them illiterate, it would not be taking a bolder step than that to which America owed the fact that it did not remain a small province of the Anglo-Saxon world. (...) they made and won a wager whose stakes are as high as the one we refuse to risk. Can we ever do it? By adding up, do two regressive forces see their direction reversed? (...) [I]n Taxila, in these Buddhist monasteries that the Greek influence has made budding with statues, I am confronted with this fleeting chance that our Old World had to remain one; the split is not yet accomplished. Another destiny is possible, the one, precisely, that Islam forbids by erecting its barrier between a West and an East which, without it, would perhaps not have lost their attachment to the common ground where they plunge their roots. (...) (...) it is the other misfortune of the Western conscience that Christianity (...) appeared "before the letter" - too early (...) ) is the middle term of a series destined by its internal logic, by geography and history, to develop henceforth in the direction of Islam; since the latter - the Moslems triumph on this point - represents the most evolved form of religious thought without being the best; I would even say by being for this reason the most worrying of the three [Buddhism, Christianity and Islam]. (...) Today, it is over Islam that I contemplate India; but that of Buddha, before Mohammed who, for me European and because European, stands between our reflection and the doctrines which are the closest to it like the rustic impediment of a round where the hands predestined to join, of the East and the West were by him disunited. What a mistake I was going to make, following those Moslems who proclaim themselves Christians and Westerners and place in their East the border between the two worlds! (...) The rational evolution is the opposite of that of history: Islam has cut in two a more civilized world. What seems to him to be current belongs to a bygone era, he lives in a millennial gap. It has been able to accomplish a revolutionary work; but as it was applied to a retarded fraction of humanity, by seeding the real it has sterilized the virtual: it has determined a progress that is the reverse of a project."
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Indeed, Muslim reciprocity is beautiful. We will cheerfully agree. I've been holding back my laughter ever since. For my purpose was to blow your temper and expose your encoding to the light: atheism is not a religion, so there is no text on which to justify or not a reciprocity or a lack of reciprocity. I do it from the Qur'an. Do you? No. Besides, Japan is "atheist"... (of course the spirituality of Shintoism is very present, but it remains immanent) and I don't think they are intolerant. Far from it and quite the opposite of your religion. So your reasoning is to say that Japanese people are intolerant and violent? Lmao. Thank you for this laughing bar. More and more people are seeing the face of Islam today. That's why I understand China's attitude.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 It doesn't change anything. There is a lack of reciprocity towards unbelievers. That's the most important thing in our societies, today: reciprocity. You have to admit it that many verses don't go in that direction. The Qur'an had some good verses. But it changed quickly cause of the historical context: conquests and wars. Muslims don't have an intellectual approach as you. Some have a fundamentalism lecture. They read the Qur'an and find these verses against unbelievers. The danger is high. Islam contains a strong dose of radicalism. What are the terro/-rists shouting? The name of their God. When I read the Quran, I was in good faith and even before that I thought, "People have a problem with Muslims." Since reading it, I understand that it is actually the other way around. Very often.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Sorry.
1
Islam don't accept cultural differences. So, yes, the conversion is an obligation. The problem is once converted, you cannot leave and you must feel afraid of Allah. What a wonderful religion.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Atheism is not a religion. There is no text. You thesis is wrong. Even Atheists are not really atheists because their language are built on a spiritual history, a culture. Example: in the West, we continue to speak as Christians, even Atheists (they just don't believe in Heaven or Hell or God). Your thesis is weak. If you want to understand Hitler, read Nazism. By the way, some Muslims countries defended Hitler. I'll let you guess why. Sorry but Anthropology classed monotheism like this: Positive reciprocity: Christianity Negative Reciprocity: Judaism Non- Reciprocity: Islam. Remember what wrote Levi-Strauss, above. And don't tell me "But, he was a jew". I don't speak about government or other thing. Just the core of each text. because the text is the language, thoughts of a culture. Everything flows from that. Specially the question of the reciprocity. You can continue to argue what you want. You cannot change the Qur'an. EDIT: Yes, and the genocide of Armenians was commit by Atheists, too? Stop taking me for a fool.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 As all anthropologists, Levi-Strauss was an analyst. And you can't be a believer in anthropology cause the role of this discipline is to eradicate all superstitions. In others words, understand humans and how it works. To understand believers, you don't need to read historical things associated. Because believers are in the same configuration. They read the text. Only the text. In their time. Not in the past time. Except ISIS, Daech... Fundamentalism. Hehe. Listen, Islam has no reciprocity. Just accept it. It doesn't change if Muslims persons are good or Evil. It explains why instability exists between Muslims and non-Muslims. Look the whole world around you. The future world will be really harsh. That's why some countries eliminate non-reciprocity. And this is a good thing. What can be done to convince a person of bad faith? Nothing. Thx for the conversation. Farewell.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 The fact that you keep coming back to atheism shows the non-reciprocity of your discourse. You apply it to all non-Muslim individuals who criticize the Qur'an. It shows the locking power of the Qur'an on your mind. If your reasoning was logical, you would apply it to the Japanese. Conclusion: it is a logic of defense, not to say rejection. It is so tiring to be tolerant of this kind of intolerance. It explains why many people are fed up with Islam. There is no dialogue possible. Because there is no reciprocity.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Gods are superstitions. Don't you know? It's always the same schema: humans create God(s), then reverse (God(s) creates Humans). Maybe there is a divinity somewhere, something like an "architect". But there is none message. There is none prophet. It's only a performative artifice to build a civilization. The power of the language, in others words. And every culture want to be the (good) One. Cause the voice of God doesn't exist. Only a silence world in which we see a paranoid intention. That's why sometimes, there is One God. Other time, 50. God is only a theorization to fill our ignorance and this unbearable silence when we put it on this world that says nothing. Maybe there is a creator. MAYBE. All religion is a game of the possible on this "Maybe". The eradication of superstitions is from Sir Edward Tylor, father of modern anthropology. We're study mankind like aliens. Atheism is not a "non-reciprocity" speech. It's just "I don't believe in superstitions". The non-reciprocity, if there is one, does not come from atheism because nothing poses it. It depends on the culture or the environment to which one belongs (Nazism, sovietism, communism, liberalism, etc.). Whereas in a religious text, it can be measured objectively. And in the case of Islam the measure is strong. Yes, the future will be harsh for your religion. Of course you don't like atheism. They are miscreants. And Allah hates them since the beginning.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 "About anthropology , studying human beings like an alien? Seriously? The studies on mankind shows that since the beginning of human civilizations humans believed in god." Anthropology takes humans as object. The question is here "Why since the beginning of mankind humans believe in God(s) ?" The answer is simple: humans need answer in a silence world. They're looking for. Always. But the answer is always the same: no response from the Nature. So they create it and inverse it. A religion is not only God, it's why the world is like this... the relations between elements (sun, moon, women, men, night, day, etc.)... Us and others (humans, animals, etc.) : the reciprocity. "Atheism contains no reciprocity, even though you don't believe in religions but you can't deny this Atheism has no reciprocity for religious cultures." As I said, you can't demonstrate what you say. Cause there is no text. It's just an "exit". I know that in Islam you can't do it: apostasy will result on death and reject (beautiful attitude one more time). You take some examples here and here, without context. Nazism used old religious signs. SS wrote divine sentences on their dagger. In short. What I am saying is that all religion is a human tinkering. It is not a lie. It is an anthropological observation. That there is a demiurge deity is one thing. That a human text is divinely true is something else. It is a belief. A hypothesis. A theory among countless other beliefs that have emerged on Earth. The human needs to fill the void of silence. Religion is a tinkering of nature, in that sense. Now, the question is to know if these tinkerings are compatible. For that, we observe the cursor of reciprocity and open-mindedness. On this point, Islam is dangerous. You are locked. You are submissive. And you can't bear to be told that you are an artificial religion among others.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Allah dislikes everything, except fear and submission.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 Lol. You're talking to yourself. This is an auto-analysis? Unwind your neuroses with someone else. There is no point in talking to someone who speaks through a religious prism (an artificial encoding), rather than through sound knowledge. Stop seeing the world as you think it is or should be. Look at the world as it is. There are no prophets, no gods. Only human tinkering. And to remind you: China has built a good tinkering: the immanent harmony. No need for the transcendental hypothesis ; a very clever but silly attempt to justify a deity of human origin (imagination and only imagination). Japan works exactly like this, too. And it works. And God is absent. Because it doesn't exist... That's why they don't like our religions. And they are right. People like you should leave. Stay in your world. Stay in your mental jail. Alone. Don't piss off other cultures with your God stories.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 "declared the submission is a via will". Yeah, sure. Tell that to kids or poor people + social pressure. A perfect disguised obligation. And once inside, you can't leave. Because apostasy is death. So shut up a little. Your religion suck. It's only submission (Islam). And you perfectly know, this incompatible with the West (freedom).
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 And to conclude, I like religions like Christianity or Buddhism. But not Islam, this intolerant and sword-wielding religion. Bye, now. Triple buzzard.
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 And take care of yourself!
1
@sameerasiddiqui5159 I'm just lucid and I know perfectly what I am: a talking animal belonging to aggressive, colonial, social, robust and paranoid specie, but with technological genius (computer, robots, IA, etc.). To say that things are bad does not require a therapist, it is just the mark of lucidity. Thx for your attention. It's sad to say but the future of mankind is China. Because they're taking seriously modern issues (global warming, capitalism, resentment, migrations, artificial intelligence, etc.). The West is too individualist and prefer freedom than ethics. The world needs harmony more than ever. No time to lose with some religions. The situation is far too urgent.
1
Yeah, that's what we think in the West. And now, we have terrorist attacks. There is no reciprocity in the Quran. There is only submission and converted the others. This is Islam.
1
Islamophobia is not really surprising when you understand what Islam is really about: submission, converted the other (because cultural differences are problematic for Allah), no reciprocity, etc.
1
@sd-yo1co "I don't want you to look at the group they belong to, I want you to look at each one of them." Yeah, but it's doesn't work like that. A religion is a GROUP, a TEXT. Muslims in particular. The big issue with Quran is the question of reciprocity is absent. I read the text. It is written: convert the others or kill them if they blame Allah. That's why instability is present when Islam comes in others countries. You know people think through their culture/religion. It's scary, I know. Some cultures are intolerant. I don't want this for Japan (I love so much this country).
1
Change food for 0.1% intolerant people. What a joke.
1
"i am a turkish muslim and wear hijab" Congratulations, you're officially trapped in submission. The pb is Islam is not respectful with others.
1
@Handle0108 Not for modesty. For submission (Islam=submission)
1
@f.h5696 But why the headscarf, today?
1
The problem is Islam is disrespectful by nature. They don't care about the others.
1
Islam exclude everyone except Muslims (who try to convert the others). That's how it works. Islam means "submission".
1
@khwael1512 A reciprocity belief with anthropological background. That's all you need to know. "So many mistakes" ? It's factual. I cited the Qur'an...
1