Comments by "Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17" (@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217) on "It's all bullsh*t." video.

  1. Yet many still side with satan.
    77
  2. Stop bludgeoning me and hitting me with your words!
    8
  3. You might want to travel... that's too radical for the 15 minute city.
    7
  4. I just can't disagree.
    6
  5. Replicate and share or sell... but do the latter for a fair price.
    5
  6. no he is not always.
    4
  7. True... but apparently some are claiming that Dahl gave permission.. i really question that.
    4
  8. That second line is key. Taxation and death are two things that are for certain.
    3
  9. Dear Paul.... Remember Orwell wrote it as "Nineteen Eighty-Four" because using numbers to him for such a type of literature title was abhorrent. Paul you are wrong as to why the term Orwellian was coined, for Orwell himself would have never wanted it if you take the time to learn why. He didn't want his pen surname to be used as a naming convention to describe what he was describing [Soviet Communism] rather he wanted us to use language intelligently and call it what it is = authoritarianism. Go look up why not to use Orwellian... sigh.
    3
  10. True.
    3
  11. Thank you Paul for using the clip from Peter Hitchens.
    2
  12.  @RealIllumin  Thanks for the clarification and further insight ;-]
    2
  13. hence why with all we are not comply/participate push-back not-give-in and resist for resistance to evil is obedience to God.
    2
  14. you mean ginormous right?
    2
  15. I agree generally with you.. but remember Orwell wrote it as "Nineteen Eighty-Four" because using numbers to him for such a type of literature title was abhorrent.
    2
  16. heh.
    2
  17.  @vadergravy  :-]
    2
  18.  @dangerousdiscourse  You do comedy eh?
    1
  19.  @Xfranman  Sad to see how uneducated you are and others who would vote that up unless it was you because you are that insecure or vain.
    1
  20.  auschwitzsoccerref.8582  Yes.. but remember... it's spiritual.. because thew word "Jew" is a religious term NOT an ethnic one which the Jews lie it is 'ethnic.'
    1
  21.  @dmtaboo_truth7052  Thumbs up...for the KJV suggestion, you show you are quite wise, godly wise in this suggestion.
    1
  22.  @mnamhie  Well, etymologically, when something is brilliant it infers no error.
    1
  23.  @DerekPower  Ok you know.. but why then did you put it in numerical form Derek?
    1
  24.  @DerekPower  I am not trying to make you sigh Derek, just was wondering that's all why you typed it as you did. Just because later editions publish it numerically thereby wilfully ignoring how Orwell put the title thus not honouring Orwell's desire does not mean Orwell would have approved. Should we not at least honour Orwell's desire in that if we truly do support his work? After all he did state in "Politics and the English Language" ; "If thought corrupt language, language can corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation".
    1
  25. he's not right on everything, you know that right?
    1
  26.  @stepheneurosailor1623  you remind me why i am happy, real happy i got rid of my TV many years ago.
    1
  27.  @darrenmarsh8830  Interesting.
    1
  28. How much evidence do we need that WE MUST PUSH BACK, PEACEFULLY, NOT COMPLY, NOT PARTICIPATE, RESIST, AND NOT GIVE IN NOR GIVE UP BECAUSE THIS IS A NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA = RISE AND REALISATION OF THE ANTICHRIST KINGDOM - A TOTAL INVERSION OF GOD'S/JESUS' ORDER!
    1
  29.  @rightsideofhistory1776  My mistake... i have small font.. it looked like it was missing the letter 'r'.
    1
  30. Not all... do better investigation and you will see why.
    1
  31.  @karlbillinger9945  Are you serious that you really think God is dead?
    1
  32.  @malibudolphin3109  Good reply to @karbillinger9945, i know of Strobel, and i think i know of Meier.
    1
  33.  @crosstie417  I have two things to communicate. Firstly you perform quite the eisegesis, you should try to obey Proverbs 18:13 when you reply, go read the verse to see why. Secondly, are you below 25?
    1
  34. It's been around a LONG time... kings would state 'OFF WITH HIS HEAD'... you know.. ministry of truth.
    1
  35.  @celtspeaksgoth7251  Thank you for sharing that. The wicked diabolists NWO kings and rulers sure do see it as a instruction manual when to Orwell it was a great warning.
    1
  36.  @McSymm_Mcsymm  who told you that?
    1
  37. Then you don't know what good means.
    1
  38. Thank you for that education.
    1
  39. Remember Orwell wrote it as "Nineteen Eighty-Four" because using numbers to him for such a type of literature title was abhorrent. Paul you are wrong as to why the term Orwellian was coined, for Orwell himself would have never wanted it if you take the time to learn why. He didn't want his pen surname to be used as a naming convention to describe what he was describing [Soviet Communism] rather he wanted us to use language intelligently and call it what it is = authoritarianism. Go look up why not to use Orwellian... sigh.
    1
  40. Prudent. Remember Orwell wrote it as "Nineteen Eighty-Four" because using numbers to him for such a type of literature title was abhorrent. Paul you are wrong as to why the term Orwellian was coined, for Orwell himself would have never wanted it if you take the time to learn why. He didn't want his pen surname to be used as a naming convention to describe what he was describing [Soviet Communism] rather he wanted us to use language intelligently and call it what it is = authoritarianism. Go look up why not to use Orwellian... sigh.
    1