Comments by "Motoryzen" (@motoryzen) on "Fedora Silverblue could be the future!" video.

first 45 seconds...Um...wtf would I want a READ ONLY os? That's asinine. What if I actually want to say..oh.I dont know... ADD FILES like pictures, documents, music, and movies as well as games? Guess what? Last I checked, that's called WRITES..as in writing data to the OS-installed storage drive. An OS that is only readable is useless. I don't buy that bs for one second. No one would want to use an OS in which doesn't allow the user to write files to it ( as in the normal crap people use a computer for). Get real.
1
@Doriandotslash The OS is the GUI that CONDUCTS...such behavior. Without an actual OS....the storage drive, cpu, ram are ALL....USELESS. -_-. Computing common sense. Heard of it? So..IF you're correct in that fedora Silverblue 30 ALLOWS you to write files...then it ISN'T a " read only" os. Are you one of those morons that also claims that nazi's and libertarians are the same kind of people too? Do you also think there are more than two physically living human genders also? It wouldn't surprise me. My point is be consistent with how you describe something. IF it's a READ ONLY os, then it's obvious that unless there is another software-based system besides THAT os that the physically living breathing human to interact with involving a separate storage drive ( as in NOT the os-installed storage drive)....there is NO way to write data to the storage system. No one this day an age would be dumb enough to create a READ ONLY os unless the os could be installed into a storage drive WITHOUT nuking the data that was already written to that storage drive and the entire purpose was perhaps some sort of OS clone drive for core ( fresh os installation) backup media. It's not my problem you have a problem with computing common sense. I've spelled out the facts, and I'm done wasting my time trying to get you to correct a mistake you made in your own video kid. I'm moving on now. Thumbs down
1