Comments by "Signora Sforza" (@signorasforza354) on "A concerning pattern in ALL Socialist childhoods" video.

  1. People believe frauds. They do crazy things when you promise them some free cookies.
    117
  2.  @dIRECTOR259  But stalin had lots of time for hanging out with 15 years old girls and having huge parties.
    47
  3.  @tidakada7357  A voice from the labor camp?
    36
  4. They are hating peasants so much aren’t they? No warlord was so cruel to peasants. The most hardworking, most beneficial people for society. The ones who were feeding them.
    27
  5.  @mcchuggernaut9378  Lmao every time “not a true commie”. This manipulation is older than my grandma. And she lived through and through Stalinism and first time in her life she was not hungry or on the edge of hunger in the middle of 60s. And first time she was able to buy any food she wanted in the store in 90s. She was growing up 200 km from DalLag, one of the biggest concentration Gulag camp. She was cursing everyone who was trying to justify cummunism. And she was 100% right.
    21
  6.  @1wun1  Nope, he was the most prominent Bolshevik.
    17
  7. Dostoyevsky himself was a property of government after amnesty. Russian empire was a collectivist country without any property rights. Everything was belonging to tzar. Even thoughts. No laws, no court, private property, no rights. Only obedience and serfdom.
    10
  8. Comintern was functioning just like mafia.
    8
  9.  @Jamespwickstromw  You are right. Even now russians don’t feel any contradiction when they praising empire and ussr in the same time.
    8
  10.  @aleksazunjic9672  You are calling an international private corporation cummunist?)
    5
  11.  @makhnothecossack4948  Keep showing ruzzian culture, Ivan. By the way Makhno was Ukrainian and Cossacks too. You should choose a name like “hobbler” or kolhoznik serf. Government property.
    5
  12. If you want them to have dignity and will to live their life and having good families themselves later, better not to beat them.
    3
  13.  @zukov85  Tell me about social security in ussr)
    2
  14.  @RambleOn07  honey in ussr you would be in jail for trying to sell two packs of soap. 7 years in camp for soap, dear.
    2
  15.  @NullParadigm  Exactly, you don’t know.
    2
  16. Oh the irony and a tragedy. Kant’s homeland was eviscerated by cummies.
    2
  17.  @allowit328 in cummunism you live in barrack or in one room with all your family including grandpa. Or in the camp.
    2
  18.  @rdallas81  Thanks to free market reforms of Deng Xiaoping.
    2
  19.  @veryunusual126  sure cummies.
    2
  20. I’m laughing every time whenever communists whine and cry about poor poor saddam.
    1
  21. He was practicing rebelling against farmers and herdsmen.
    1
  22.  @maxmensch8910  He was. That’s why many eastern Germans are still so pro ruzzian. Because they didn’t even change their mind from nazi to soviet. Zero difference.
    1
  23.  @maxmensch8910  He was. That’s why many eastern Germans are still so pro ruzzian. Because they didn’t even change their mind from nazi to soviet. Zero difference.
    1
  24. His “art” was good for a 6-7 grader in the art school
    1
  25. Well he was a socialist. Like all socialists.
    1
  26. Yeah, fascist looks like innocent tender puppies compared to communists.
    1
  27.  @Adonnus100  Poor poor serial killers.
    1
  28.  @Adonnus100  Well that’s good that you don’t, me neither
    1
  29. Every one can see the result of Bolshevism in the Karelia, occupied Finnish land by ruzzkies. It’s a disaster.
    1
  30. But somehow cummies were robbing peasants from everything including their lives.
    1
  31.  @martiendejong8857  Same stories cummies were telling in 19 century
    1
  32.  @Jamespwickstromw  Exactly. Even now russians don’t have any ideological or psychological dissonance in praising empire and ussr at the same time.
    1
  33.  @makhnothecossack4948  recommendations from a cannibal
    1
  34. In my experience people who tend to be fanatic in one superstitious ideology can change ideologies throughout their lives and not even being sorry for damage they’ve caused to their families and society.
    1
  35. I would even volunteer to be a demon in that hell😂
    1
  36.  @die1mayer  they didn’t take responsibility, they were committing atrocious human experiments and were failing horribly but their actions were justified by their zealots. Even now they are justifying all disgrace and cringe with plain lies and manipulations.
    1
  37.  @martiendejong8857  Lmao, no, cummies are the same. That what cummies done. Worse than nazi.
    1
  38.  @aleksazunjic9672 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Go back to barracks
    1
  39.  @rdallas81  funny how capitalistic China is)
    1
  40.  @getoutofherestalker2441  Nice fairy tale, now go back to your barrack
    1
  41.  @701delbronx8  lmao, Khrushchevka standart😂 Moscow is just robbing Siberia and Far East. Banana country
    1
  42.  @allowit328  lmao. You’ve must have missed the reality of cummunist countries. It is so sad that western cummies never ever didn’t move to cummunist countries to live there as proletariat))) Why so?
    1
  43.  @allowit328  Sure dude, why do you whining then? You can rent a room in a barrack without toilet and bathroom with your family and live a happy cummie life. Ah, no barracks is USA? That’s why you are unhappy? You can move to ruzzia then. There are still many.
    1
  44. There is no such thing as Russian Jew in Russian empire. Jews didn’t live where russians lived. They were forbidden to do so. Jews were living only on the lands of Ukrainian, Belarusian, Lithuanias, Latvians, Poles, and Caucasus. They’ve adopted Russian-Soviet identity only after living in ussr for many years.
    1
  45.  @shracc  You don’t need any talent to robbing peasants.
    1
  46. Levitan disagrees.
    1
  47.  @aleksazunjic9672  I see that you are a perfect product of the gulag society
    1
  48.  @marksharp3990  Those intelligent people are frauds themselves, morally corrupted people or people with psychological problems because of bad upbringing. Every time I was having a discussion with an “intelligent” communist, in the end they were praising, justifying, denying or minimizing all horrendous stuff commies did and were slandering their opponents and victims with ridiculous lies. Cummunism is a religion for thugs.
    1
  49.  @sepijortikka  why cummies love free labor and government slavery so much?
    1
  50.  @sepijortikka  no one was inviting you here, cummie. Seems like you have problems with self respect. Worse then MLM agent)))
    1
  51.  @brankourosevic7743  didn’t know Nuland was a banderite
    1
  52. Not only Vory(aka robbers) but Vory and KGB. Criminals and kgb are two foundations of ruzzia. That’s why they love cummunists. Because cummunists love thugs.
    1
  53.  @aleksazunjic9672 ruzzian schools looks like prisons. They are plain awful.
    1
  54.  @yzmey42113  Nope it didn’t. It was pretty bad by all standards, even worse then Turkey
    1
  55.  @makhnothecossack4948  lmao. ruzzkie were starving and robbing people to get some American factories. Worse than pimps.
    1
  56.  @yzmey42113  It was defeated by everyone collapsed before Bolsheviks.
    1
  57.  @makhnothecossack4948  so ruzzkie didn’t have anything and were robbing and starving peasants to get some factories. Confessions of a cummie.
    1
  58.  @makhnothecossack4948  So you just didn’t have anything and even till the end of ussr you can’t produce nice panties.
    1
  59.  @yzmey42113  Sikorsky wasn’t Russian and didn’t built his industry in russia. It was impossible.
    1
  60.  @ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw  There were no any natural famines in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Kuban. It is impossible to live in Ukraine and naturally starving. Because land is so rich and Ukrainians are good farmers. Kazakhs were owning cattle and were nomads. They were not ever starving until reds arrived . Cummies were committing ethnocide, destroying resistance and were breaking societies and were committing occupation of the starved lands. Don’t read about something from the perpetrator.
    1
  61.  @yzmey42113  Sure. And nazi were committing crimes only against Germany and Holocaust was a crime against Germans. Ruzzkie never stop showing their true colors.
    1
  62.  @yzmey42113  Serial crimes are the proof of the crime, Ivan.
    1
  63.  @yzmey42113  If you will try to tell something similar about Irish being actually English you’ll need a dentist. Same here, Ivan. Sikorsky was Ukrainian.
    1
  64.  @yzmey42113  ruzzian in ruzzian empire was an imperialistic concept which was meaning Ukrainian, Belarusian and Velikoros people. Just like Irish were British before and some are still British. Even Lenin was calling himself Velikoros. Only Stalin moved that identity of russians to velikorosian. Read some books vanya.
    1
  65.  @yzmey42113  Ireland was British but Irish people always existed. And they were Irish even when they were speaking English. Ukrainian were living in Ukraine and were having their culture and ethnic identity long before Moscow decided to steal the name Russia. Your ethnocidic propaganda just shows who you are.
    1
  66.  @makhnothecossack4948  Where is your ussr, vanya?
    1
  67.  @yzmey42113  Lmao, Ukrainians also have their own nobility and history and it’s your problem that you are an ignorant nazi who deny reality, history and culture of a 50million people’s ethnicity. Pretty funny from someone who doesn’t not have a national identity till now. Name me a Russian king, Ivan)
    1
  68.  @yzmey42113  It is Moscow douchy was rules by Ruthenian Nobility. Not the other way around. It was Kyiv prince who founded Moscow not the other way around. Daniel Romanovich (Ukrainian: Данило Романович, romanized: Danylo Romanovych;[1][2] 1201–1264),[3][4] also known as Daniel or Daniil of Galicia,[5] or Danylo of Halych,[6][a] was Prince of Galicia (1205–1207; 1211–1212; 1230–1232; 1233–1234; 1238–1264), Volhynia (1205–1208; 1215–1238), Grand Prince of Kiev (1240), and King of Ruthenia (1253–1264).[7] Moscow was a Golden Horde colony when Ukraine was in confederation with Lithuania. And we’re enjoying Magdeburg legislations. And we’re having their own Hetmanate. Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny (Ukrainian: Петро Конашевич-Сагайдачний; Polish: Piotr Konaszewicz-Sahajdaczny; born c. 1582[2] – 20 April 1622) was a political and civic leader, who was a Hetman of Ukrainian Cossacks from 1616 to 1622.[2] During his tenure, he transformed Zaporozhian Cossacks from irregular military troops into a regular army and improved relations between the Cossacks, the Orthodox clergy and peasants of Ukraine, which would later contribute to the establishment of a modern Ukrainian national consciousness. A military leader of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth both on land and sea, Sahaidachny is best known for the significant role his troops played in the Battle of Khotyn against the Ottoman Empire in 1621, as well as the Polish Prince Władysław IV Vasa's attempt to usurp the Moscow throne in 1618.[3]
    1
  69.  @yzmey42113  Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth Rzeczpospolita Trojga Narodów (Polish) Trijų Tautų Respublika (Lithuanian Річ Посполита Трьох Народів (Ukrainian) Res Publica (Latin)
    1
  70.  @yzmey42113  The Principality or, from 1253, Kingdom of Galicia–Volhynia,[a] historically known as the Kingdom of Ruthenia,[2][b] was a medieval state in Eastern Europe which existed from 1199 to 1349. Its territory was predominantly located in modern-day Ukraine, with parts in Belarus, Poland, Moldova, and Lithuania. Along with Novgorod and Vladimir-Suzdal, it was one of the three most important powers to emerge from the collapse of Kievan Rus'. The main language was Old East Slavic, the predecessor of the modern East Slavic languages, and the official religion was Eastern Orthodoxy.
    1
  71.  @yzmey42113  Konstanty Wasyl Ostrogski (Ukrainian: Костянтин-Василь Острозький, romanized: Kostiantyn-Vasyl Ostrozkyi; Belarusian: Канстантын Васіль Астрожскi; Lithuanian: Konstantinas Vasilijus Ostrogiškis; 2 February 1526 – 13 or 23 February 1608) was a Ruthenian Orthodox magnate of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, a prince, starost of Volodymyr, marshal of Volhynia and voivode of the Kiev Voivodeship. Ostrogski refused to help False Dmitriy I and supported Jan Zamoyski.
    1
  72.  @yzmey42113  Dmytro Ivanovych Vyshnevetsky (Ukrainian: Дмитро Іванович Вишневе́цький; Russian: Дмитрий Иванович Вишневе́цкий; Polish: Dymitr Wiśniowiecki) was a Ruthenian magnate of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. He established the Zaporozhian Cossack stronghold on the Small Khortytsia Island. He was also known as Baida (Байда) in Ukrainian folk songs.
    1
  73.  @yzmey42113  The Cossack Hetmanate[nb 1] (Ukrainian: Гетьма́нщина, romanized: Hetmanshchyna; Polish: Hetmanat, Hetmańszczyzna; Russian: Ге́тманщина, romanized: Getmanshchina), officially the Zaporozhian Host or Army of Zaporozhia (Ukrainian: Військо Запорозьке, romanized: Viisko Zaporozke; Latin: Exercitus Zaporoviensis),[8] is a historical term for the 17th–18th centuries Ukrainian Cossack state[8] located in central Ukraine.[5][9] It existed between 1649 and 1764, although its administrative-judicial system persisted until 1782.
    1
  74.  @yzmey42113  Ivan Sirko (Ukrainian: Іван Дмитрович Сірко, tr. Ivan Dmytrovych Sirko, [ɪˈwɑn dmɪˈtrɔwɪt͡ʃ sɪrˈkɔ]; Polish: Iwan Sierko, [iˈvan sʲɛrˈkɔ]; Russian: Иван Дмитриевич Серко, romanized: Ivan Dmitrievich Serko, [ɪˈvan ˈdmʲitrʲɪjɪvʲɪt͡ɕ sʲɪrˈko]; c. 1610–1680) was a Ukrainian Cossack military leader, Koshovyi Otaman of the Zaporozhian Host and putative co-author of the famous semi-legendary Cossack letter to the Ottoman sultan that inspired the major painting Reply of the Zaporozhian Cossacks by the 19th-century artist Ilya Repin.
    1
  75.  @yzmey42113  Image - Paraska Sulyma (died 1766) (1750s portrait). Image - Semen Sulyma, colonel of Pereiaslav (1750s photo). Sulyma [Сулима]. A line of Cossack starshyna in Left-Bank Ukraine. The family name was established by Mykhailo, who lived in the 16th century. His son was Hetman Ivan Sulyma (d 1635). The hetman's sons included Stepan (d 1659), a captain of Boryspil company, and Fedir (d 1691), a colonel of Pereiaslav regiment. Fedir's son, Ivan (d 1721), was a captain of Voronkiv company (1687) and general flag-bearer under Ivan Mazepa and Ivan Skoropadsky (1708–21). Ivan's son, Semen (d 27 May 1766), was colonel of Pereiaslav regiment (1739–66). Semen's sons included Yakym (b 1737, d 1818), a general judge in Chernihiv (1797–1818), and Khrystofor (d 18 May 1813 in the Transfiguration Monastery in Kharkiv), the bishop of Teodosiia and Mariupol (1791–9) and then of Kharkiv (1799–1813). Their nephew, Mykola (b 12 December 1777, d 21 October 1840), was colonel of the Izmail regiment (1803), a major general (1812–16), governor-general of eastern, then western, Siberia (1834–6), and a member of the Military Council (1836). The Russian revolutionary and anarchist theoretician P. Kropotkin (b 1842, d 1921) was related to the family through the female line. The family archive was published in part by Oleksander Lazarevsky in Sulimovskii arkhiv: Famil’nye bumagi Sulim, Skorup, i Voitsekhovichei XVII–XVIII vv. (The Sulyma Archive: The Family Papers of the Sulymas, Skorupas, and Voichekhovyches in the 17th–18th centuries, 1884).
    1
  76.  @yzmey42113  Mazepa, Ivan [Мазепа, Іван], b 20 March 1639 in Mazepyntsi, near Bila Tserkva, d 2 October 1709 in Bendery, Bessarabia. Hetman of Ukraine in 1687–1709; son of Stepan-Adam Mazepa and Maryna Mazepa. He studied at the Kyivan Mohyla College and at the Jesuit college in Warsaw. While a page at the court of Jan II Casimir Vasa in Warsaw, he was sent by the king to study in Holland. In 1656–9 he learned gunnery in Deventer and visited Germany, Italy, France, and the Low Countries. After his return to Warsaw Mazepa continued his service as a royal courtier, and in 1659–63 he was sent on various diplomatic missions to Ukraine. The legend of his affair with Madame Falbowska and his subsequent punishment by being tied to the back of a wild horse was first popularized by the Polish memorialist J. C. Pasek. Although it has no basis in fact, it has inspired a number of European Romantics, including Franz Liszt, Peter Tchaikovsky, George Byron, Victor Hugo, and Aleksandr Pushkin and led to a rather fanciful image of the Ukrainian hetman as a youth. In 1663 Mazepa returned to Ukraine to help his ailing father. After his father’s death in 1665 he succeeded him as hereditary cupbearer of Chernihiv. In 1669 Mazepa entered the service of Hetman Petro Doroshenko as a squadron commander in the Hetman’s Guard, and later he served as Doroshenko’s chancellor. He took part in Doroshenko’s 1672 campaign against Poland in Galicia and served on diplomatic missions, including ones to the Crimea and Turkey (1673–4). During a mission in 1674 he was captured by the Zaporozhian otaman Ivan Sirko, who was forced to hand him over to Doroshenko’s rival in Left-Bank Ukraine, Ivan Samoilovych. Mazepa quickly gained the confidence of Samoilovych and Tsar Peter I, was made a ‘courtier of the hetman,’ and was sent on numerous missions to Moscow. Mazepa participated in the Chyhyryn campaigns, 1677–8. In 1682 he was appointed Samoilovych’s general osaul. He was elected the new hetman on 25 July 1687 by the Cossack council.
    1
  77.  @yzmey42113  Petryk, Petro (Ivanenko), b and d ? Cossack figure at the end of the 17th century, descended from a Cossack officer family in Poltava regiment. In 1691 he abandoned his post of senior scribe at Hetman Ivan Mazepa's General Military Chancellery and fled to the Zaporozhian Sich, where he was elected military chancellor. In 1692 he concluded a treaty with the Crimean Tatars against Muscovy and began a long struggle against the Cossack starshyna and Muscovite ‘landlords.’ With his 500 Zaporozhian followers and Tatar allies he tried to instigate popular revolts in Ukraine in 1692, 1693, 1694, and 1696. Having failed in those attempts he settled in Tatar territory between the Boh River and the Dnipro River and served until 1712 as ‘hetman’ of so-called Khan Ukraine.
    1
  78.  @yzmey42113  Kochubei, Vasyl [Кочубей, Василь; Kočubej, Vasyl'], b ca 1640, d 25 July 1708. Statesman. Under Hetman Petro Doroshenko he carried out diplomatic assignments such as the mission to Adrianople in 1675. Under Hetman Ivan Samoilovych he was the supervisor of the General Military Chancellery and in 1685 his envoy in Moscow. He helped Hetman Ivan Mazepa to come to power. Under Mazepa he was general chancellor (1687–99) and general judge (1699–1708), and on occasion he served as acting hetman. Kochubei led the Poltava Cossack officers’ opposition to Ukraine’s participation in the anti-Turkish coalition at the end of the 17th century, which culminated in Petro Petryk’s rebellion against Mazepa and Peter I. This affected his hitherto friendly relations with Mazepa. Mazepa's love affair with Kochubei’s daughter, Motria Kochubei, further strained relations between the two men in 1704. Upon learning of Mazepa's secret negotiations with King Stanislaus I Leszczyński of Poland, Kochubei and the colonel of Poltava, Ivan Iskra, denounced Mazepa’s political plans to Peter, possibly in the hope of winning the hetman’s office. Peter initiated an investigation, which found nothing to prove Kochubei’s accusations. Trusting Mazepa, Peter had Kochubei and Iskra arrested and taken to Vitsebsk where, under torture, they were forced to recant. Peter had them returned to Ukraine and beheaded. They were buried at the Kyivan Cave Monastery
    1
  79.  @yzmey42113  So you are just a typical nazi, ivan. Even worse, nazi didn’t deny existence of Jews at least.
    1
  80.  @RaRd8z  That dude is a Stalinist. Typical example of typical russian.
    1
  81.  @yzmey42113  Lol, sure, ivan. Anybody can check information and realize that you are lying. As usually. olitical and cultural life in the Lithuanian-Ruthenian state was based on the traditions of the Kyivan Rus’ and Galician-Volhynian states. An official Ruthenian language evolved from the language used in Rus’. The legal system was based on the legal traditions of Kyivan Rus’ (see Lithuanian-Ruthenian law and Lithuanian Statute). The Lithuanians also benefited from the military expertise of Rus’ in organizational and fortification skills. Dynastic ties between the princes of Rus’ and Lithuania helped to maintain the Ruthenian influence. The Ruthenian princes belonged to the duke's councils and were part of the ruling class. The Orthodox church was allowed to develop freely, and it played an important role in the country's cultural and educational life. Manufacturing and trade developed rapidly in the cities and towns. The situation changed abruptly after 1385, when Jagiełło (1377–92) concluded the Union of Krevo and assumed the Polish crown
    1
  82.  @yzmey42113  It is Moscow douchy was rules by Ruthenian Nobility. Not the other way around. It was Kyiv prince who founded Moscow not the other way around. Daniel Romanovich (Ukrainian: Данило Романович, romanized: Danylo Romanovych;[1][2] 1201–1264),[3][4] also known as Daniel or Daniil of Galicia,[5] or Danylo of Halych,[6][a] was Prince of Galicia (1205–1207; 1211–1212; 1230–1232; 1233–1234; 1238–1264), Volhynia (1205–1208; 1215–1238), Grand Prince of Kiev (1240), and King of Ruthenia (1253–1264).[7] Moscow was a Golden Horde colony when Ukraine was in confederation with Lithuania. And we’re enjoying Magdeburg legislations. And we’re having their own Hetmanate. Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny (Ukrainian: Петро Конашевич-Сагайдачний; Polish: Piotr Konaszewicz-Sahajdaczny; born c. 1582[2] – 20 April 1622) was a political and civic leader, who was a Hetman of Ukrainian Cossacks from 1616 to 1622.[2] During his tenure, he transformed Zaporozhian Cossacks from irregular military troops into a regular army and improved relations between the Cossacks, the Orthodox clergy and peasants of Ukraine, which would later contribute to the establishment of a modern Ukrainian national consciousness. A military leader of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth both on land and sea, Sahaidachny is best known for the significant role his troops played in the Battle of Khotyn against the Ottoman Empire in 1621, as well as the Polish Prince Władysław IV Vasa's attempt to usurp the Moscow throne in 1618.[3]
    1
  83.  @yzmey42113  The new state began to be called the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia (from the name of a region in northwestern Lithuania). It's interesting that due to there was no written Lithuanian language at that times, the Ruthenian (i.e. Old Ukrainian) language, as the most widely spoken one by almost 80% of population, has been used in the official documents of the Grand Duchy until ... 1697, albeit Latin, German, and later Polish were sometimes used too. Another amazing fact is that only in 1387 Lithuania itself and their princes were finally baptised, being before a true pagan state. It should be noted that Muscovy was under Mongol rule for over 240 years, three times longer than Ukraine. Ivan I Kalita (ruled in 1325–1340), one of the founders of Muscovy, spent most of his time on the throne not in ruling in Moscow but traveling to Saray.
    1
  84.  @yzmey42113  It is Moscow douchy was rules by Ruthenian Nobility. Not the other way around. It was Kyiv prince who founded Moscow not the other way around. Daniel Romanovich (Ukrainian: Данило Романович, romanized: Danylo Romanovych (1201–1264), also known as Daniel or Daniil of Galicia, or Danylo of Halych, was Prince of Galicia (1205–1207; 1211–1212; 1230–1232; 1233–1234; 1238–1264), Volhynia (1205–1208; 1215–1238), Grand Prince of Kiev (1240), and King of Ruthenia (1253–1264). Moscow was a Golden Horde colony when Ukraine was in confederation with Lithuania. And we’re enjoying Magdeburg legislations. And we’re having their own Hetmanate. Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny (Ukrainian: Петро Конашевич-Сагайдачний; Polish: Piotr Konaszewicz-Sahajdaczny; born c. 1582 – 20 April 1622) was a political and civic leader, who was a Hetman of Ukrainian Cossacks from 1616 to 1622. During his tenure, he transformed Zaporozhian Cossacks from irregular military troops into a regular army and improved relations between the Cossacks, the Orthodox clergy and peasants of Ukraine, which would later contribute to the establishment of a modern Ukrainian national consciousness. A military leader of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth both on land and sea, Sahaidachny is best known for the significant role his troops played in the Battle of Khotyn against the Ottoman Empire in 1621, as well as the Polish Prince Władysław IV Vasa's attempt to usurp the Moscow throne in 1618.
    1
  85.  @yzmey42113  So basically I’ve proven that you lied all the way through. Now go to your bottle, Ivan)
    1
  86.  @yzmey42113  Keep worsening your look, Ivan)
    1
  87.  @yzmey42113  You have nothing but poor manipulations. Ukrainians are called Ruthenians just like Poles were called Lyahi, and Romanians were Wlahi. It was written in their documents. I’ve proven that you are a typical ruzzkie liar. I have no intention to prove you anything. I’ve proven to the public. As about you, I wish only criminal justice upon you, Ivan.
    1
  88.  @makhnothecossack4948  Where is your ussr?))) You’ve sold it for jeans and hubba bubba 😂😂😂
    1
  89.  @socire72  didn’t ask a cummie
    1
  90. stalin was a bank robber.
    1
  91.  @aleksazunjic9672  I just love how cummies call a country without any social protections a socialist country😂 By the way all my Chinese businessmen friends are moving out of China. With their money.
    1
  92.  @1wun1  It’s so sweet when cummies exclude their leaders when they are not so comfortable to show in decent public. Just like mafia “oh no, that guy is not our”😂 But I’ll clap my hands and same cummies will justify and deny each and every atrocity committed by all Bolsheviks under his rule.
    1
  93.  @mcchuggernaut9378  No, dear, stalin was a Bolsheviks leader and was chosen by Bolsheviks. He was the most prominent Bolshevik. Stop justify cummies.
    1
  94. And how they were completely ok with all disasters and catastrophes were cause by cummies. They see people like rats in laboratory while preaching about humanism 24:7
    1
  95.  @mcchuggernaut9378  Stalin was a typical communist. A classic one. Nothing special.
    1
  96.  @romitkumar6272  and cummies are very greedy just like all thugs
    1
  97. Russia was very backward and became much worse after Bolshevik’s coup.
    1
  98.  @korana6308  Im not lecturing for free, you can just read books. It was backwards.
    1
  99.  @korana6308  literally, acchuwally)))) Nope, anyone can just check documents, photos, videos, books written by historians…
    1
  100.  @korana6308  sure natasha, now you can go to your barrack
    1
  101.  @maxmensch8910  he was a classical socialist.
    1