Comments by "mowgli2071" (@mowgli2071) on "Ed Nash's Military Matters"
channel.
-
38
-
16
-
@iatsd that's not true at all.
F-16 is very good for air defense.
And Grippen simply does not have the range that the F-16 has.
Range is king in the pacific.
Nor do any of the fighters that you're going to mention have the data link capability that the F-16 has.
The Philippines will most likely be using American ordinance for anti-ship and anti-air missions. An American platform interfaces with such ordinance more seamlessly than a non-US platform.
And then there's the satellite interface. Sweden simply can't match the American satellite network.
Nor does it have the parts train or experience pool that the F-16 has.
Belgium, Greece, Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, and Israel have all flown the F-16 longer than the Grippen has existed. And then there's Argentina, South Korea, and Taiwan, and Singapore.
8
-
6
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1