Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Chambers Flintlock Machine Gun from the 1700s" video.

  1. i didnt even think they had crap like this to be honest i knew they had better but this is literally the equivelant of a minigun but back then
    53
  2. or the hwatcha that was another weapon that was rapidfire like the minigun of back then and it was before this it was a primitive rocket launcher that fired them really fast
    22
  3. M B you know terrorists/bad guys etc do that anyway and our government actually arms the people we are supposed to be fighting against such as isis etc also even if they do get these things we'd have the same or more to fight back with so it doesnt really matter if the bad guys have them thats kinda the whole point of the second amendment to be able to take on whoever we should come up against
    15
  4. N!TR0Jackalope i dont know if they responded that way or not exactly but yeah thats what its there for for people to be able to defend themselves from who or whatever they come across that tries to harm them whether that be government thugs or regular street thugs or a charging animal etc that would hurt them and do it with whatever they pleased or feel they needed to do it with i mean think about if everyone didnt go by the so called "laws" they "pass" nowadays how much less crime there would owning everything the military has criminals would definately think twice and even other armies that are our enemies definately wouldnt want to invade us but people wont because they fear the big government and military/police that theyd go to jail or be killed
    13
  5.  @I_like_turtles_67  probly more deadly actually considering an ar is only a .223 caliber bullet versus a probly .70 or .50 caliber or something close to that ball or you know cannons with way bigger balls than that
    9
  6. Nathan Brown also the fact that this exists like they said this is the equivelant of a minigun back then when the rest of the people were most likely using single loading muskets
    9
  7. M B youre thinking way too much into whats being said and yes i know people can turn but more than likely it doesnt happen like that and there would be other people to notice that and fire back on you for doing that like i said good people having the weapons makes the bad people having them even out and it would rain down back on them or if they saw them theyd stop it before that could even happen
    9
  8. Nathan Brown thats not the point they dont care about destructive power they just want you disarmed period even if its a knife look at the uk you cant even carry a butter knife on you...
    8
  9. Michael Woods dude back in the day people had the smarts to make this and it wouldnt be any more expensive than buying the muskets they had and modifying a bunch together into one of these things and im sure they could and did buy these cause they didnt have the stupid "laws" we have nowadays there were no "civilian" vs "military" weapons just like still today weapons are just weapons who uses them are irrelevant to what type they are just cause the military uses them most often or at all doesnt make them ""military" weapons""
    8
  10. Square Body Chevys this thing is basically a minigun just not beltfed and motor driven with modern cased ammo this would be the equivelant of one back then if you ask me especially going against other people who more than likely only had single loading muskets
    6
  11. Owlly Mannstein with a gun this awesome i dont think gun guys would care about how long it takes to load compared to how long you can shoot it i would know im a gun guy
    5
  12. strider04 ok bud youre really being stupid now even experienced gunsmiths could have that happen thats why you dont test them unsafely
    5
  13. strider04 people woulda made their own tools back then even today people do it im sure brandon harrera didnt used to know how but everyone can learn how that wants to it just takes testing what works and what doesnt
    4
  14. tbobay nfa and any laws that put limits on any weapon of any kind are actually null and void cause of the second amendment the way its written
    4
  15. strider04 lol whatver you say bud it might take a while but someone could figure it out
    4
  16. strider04 i dont care when you respond just saying you dont need a degree or be a "professional" to know how to build a homemade gun that wont explode alot of new gun designs that actually worked havent came from people who knew everything about how guns worked they were people who had hobbies or were machinists and like testing new things and making new things they havent tried before or were interested in the mechanics of making something like a gun work and stuff like that
    3
  17. Sérgio Henrique wow just wow they probly knew more than alot of people nowadays
    3
  18. Ian Furqueron i understand it would be alot to load a beltfed but this you have to load the actual powder and ammo for every shot it can fire with a beltfed its usually already assembled you just put the bullets into it
    3
  19. strider04 ok bud youre one of those idiots that thinks you have to have a little piece of paper to know what theyre doing and people make working guns all the time that arent professional gunsmiths or that actually know alot about guns mark serbu started as a machinist not really knowing anything about them like i said all it takes is the will to learn and try things and i never said they did all have a forge or that anyone was any smarter than anyone else i said people even today make guns homemade that wont blow up when you shoot them theres a guy that literally does this all the time his name is royal nonesuch on youtube
    3
  20.  @samuellubell4557  it's still a machinegun
    3
  21. Mrjohnnymoo1 this wasnt before democrats this is before people were dumb and let people even talk about banning inanimate objects "because bad guys use them" which isnt a valid reason for the fact that its dumber than rocks but more importanly the second amendment says "arms" which are all weapons not just certain ones
    3
  22. encarn and make sure its the right amount of ammo and make it alot faster to load and possibly prevent it from getting wet
    3
  23. John Smith well its not actually all the feds fault, yes they enforce it with their brainwashed army that think theyre doing the right thing but then again if we just all said screw their unconstitutional "laws" and anyone who enforces them what could they do against 350 million people who all owned what we should be able to own (which is anything the army can and does own)
    3
  24. it wouldnt be an "assault" musket itd be called a mini musket instead of minigun i mean look at the thing thats the equivelant of a minigun today back then
    3
  25. if anyone ever argues they couldnt have imagined machine guns back then show them this this is the perfect example that they could and did imagine machine guns or other weapons in general
    3
  26. Thom itd be like a gatling gun except actually fully automatic and you cant stop it until its out of ammo or something else that would stop it
    3
  27. 1423 171 doesnt matter that the stupid government interprets them as theyre still firearms and the second amendment makes their interpretations irrelevant is says the right of the people to keep and bear arms (which are weapons not short for firearms) shall not be infringed. an infringement is any limitation they would try to put on any weapon/weapon accessory because if they can ban an accessory they can ban all guns/weapons cause they would word it as anything that can fire a round (a trigger which is an accessorie) is banned therfore banning all guns
    3
  28. Olueni onLoppu it would probly just spin around and not hit anything or spin toward your own soldiers and cause friendly fire if its mounted like it was intended
    3
  29. strider04 ok whatever you say bud people could and did do that its no different than today other than what they wouldve used or how they wouldve learned to
    3
  30. Ward Vermassen that a good murica or a bad one?
    2
  31. SnakebitSTI "modern safety satndards" are irrelevant here theres so many things that are considered "unsafe" by the pussies that are "in charge" of us everything can be dangerous if used a certain way even literally air if you compress it then use an airgun its just like an explosion cause thats all an explosion is force
    2
  32. SgtKOnyx thats what ian said its a runaway machine gun not a trigger machinegun like today where you can control the firing once you start with the trigger and stop it from shooting all your ammo or nothing
    2
  33. Thom they more than likely had muskets that shot once though and then you had to reload and this is a machine gun theyd probly all be dead before they got two shots off a piece
    2
  34.  @charlessmith6412  also there's no such thing as an "assault weapon" cause any weapon can be used to assault someone its a made up word to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons
    2
  35. strider04 yeah thats as your building the gun and you dont need rifling or even a sight i was just talking about building one and it not blowing up part thats what the testing does even newer production guns from professional gun makers have to be pressure and safety tested idiot they dont just say "oh well from what we know about how to produce them we'll just not test it and send it out to people and hope for the best" and i didnt "just edit it to make you look stupid" youre doing that on your own bud i edited it cause i missed something i was gonna say you must be a mind reader if you think you know i was thinking to edit it to make you look stupid also you said "can fire out of battery" im sure you meant cant fire out of battery* but still
    2
  36. thats not an anti safety thats just how it functions cause its a flintlock with multiple charges of ammo
    2
  37. WalkaCrookedLine they shouldntve came into a war where they were fighting people with these things but he said they werent used anyway
    2
  38. strider04 youre not getting what im saying
    2
  39. Big Blue thats the same with any gun (not that you cant stop it once it starts but need to be pointing it in the right way when fired)
    2
  40. strider04 i didnt say they had them back then and they are pretty darn simple to build all you have is a tigger and hammer and the springs that go with it a housing and the barrel and forearm and stock and firing pin and a spring for that
    2
  41. strider04 i know what youre saying but its crap to be honest cause the guns werent near as complicated as todays guns and more people were more knowledgable than today (not like knowing or making todays tech but i mean they learned better and faster etc cause nowadays people dont rely on their own brains for their information they rely on computers and stuff to even memorise things for them
    2
  42. strider04 dude do you even know what a break action gun is? is so simple people with pretty much no knowledge of how guns work can figure out how to build one it doesnt take any skills whatsoever cause skills are learned first you dont just automatically know how to do something like youre acting like you or anyone esle that knows how to do stuff does and you proved my point to get to the point they had training or whatever but not all people do go through training they figure out what works and what doesnt already having experience doesnt make sense cause you had to do something (testing what works or not or being taught) to get there in the first place you dont just start out with the experience
    2
  43.  @bensmith4563  depending if you're being safe with it or not the safety on a gun is between your ears not on the gun itself cause what if you forget to put it on or it breaks and doesn't work anymore?
    2
  44. strider04 i accept your apology i really dont mean any harm just trying to have a conversation also sorry for the names 👍
    2
  45. William Sager dude if testing a gun is too dangerous wed never have new guns
    1
  46. strider04 thanks for understanding you sound like a cool person
    1
  47.  @christoph8365  not in their minds but a machingun is a machinegun in reality thats a big reason but not the main one why its stupid to go by their "legal" "classicifications"/"laws" regaurding guns/weapons the main one is that its literally against the law to make any "laws" that limit what we can and cant have weaponwise in any way or for any reason cause of the second amendment
    1
  48.  @trinova9581  and? like i said a machinegun is a machinegun doesnt matter what type it is
    1
  49.  @trinova9581  they shoot all of them at once this shoots one and then ignites the other continuously which is what a machinegun does thats a big difference between volleyfire guns and machineguns i didnt say volleyfire guns are machineguns i said machineguns are machineguns no matter what type they are (meaning what system it uses like this flintlock one that uses the single action of the flintlock to ignite rounds one by one until theyre out of ammo) not that they fired all the bullets literally in one shot
    1
  50.  @trinova9581  also even if its controlled or not it doesnt change how it fires it still is firing like a machinegun fires one working of the flintlock action and it fires all or as many as you put in it if it doesnt get hung up or something else that could go wrong just like a modern machinegun would the only difference is like you said its you shoot all of them or you dont shoot at all basically instead of modern day with a trigger that you can choose hpw many rounds you shoot
    1
  51.  @trinova9581  youre not getting what im saying at all if you think its the same think of the volley gun as a shotgun instead of how youre thinking of it and then think of the flintlock machinegun as single shots being fired each time the gun fires instead of the fact that it fires all of them yes it fires all of them but not all of the bullets at once like a volley gun in one big shot like a shotgun 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  52.  @trinova9581  thats the nowadays version of a machinegun what we think of them nowadays and i dont care if they dont consider it what it is theyre wrong theu just dont want to admit they had way better stuff than regular muskets back in the day cause they want to be right cause they know theyre wrong
    1
  53.  @SgtKOnyx  doesnt make it any less of one though
    1
  54.  @whyjay9959  doesnt have to be it fires all the rounds that are loaded with one operation of the flintlock action one after the other doesnt matter if it loads itself or not its not like modern machineguns with bolts and gas systems like you think of today
    1
  55.  @TactaGhoul  the basic design was handcranked so not a machinegun also definately not the same original design cause of that
    1
  56.  @Notjustcar  theyre called hwatchas or something like that i cant remember how its spelled
    1
  57.  @rrolf71  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  58. encarn speed loader
    1
  59.  @as-jp5cl  black powder is too dirty even with a flushing device youd have to flush it way too often this machinegun was just basically a bunch of barrels all put together though so it could fire continuously not like a gas system and a bolt etc like that that we think of today
    1
  60. too bad theres no such thing as an "assault" anything unless its literally just named that to make fun of the liberals
    1
  61.  @Pitchlock8251  highly doubt it they had better guns and even then they called them obsolete or whatever
    1
  62.  @jrggrop  machineguns are machineguns therefore are real machineguns either way so they had machineguns when blackpowder was around instead of smokeless
    1
  63.  @parkercushingable  itd be legal anyway second amendment says you can't put any "laws" on what we can own/use weapon or weapon related wise
    1
  64.  @bradymiller7334  they'll take all of our weapons if we keep allowing them to by not using the second amendment as intended to fight tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  65.  @kaiserwilhelmdergrosse1871  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  66.  @crazysilly2914  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  67.  @DeliveryMcGee  you dont know what a machinegun is of you think it isnt its literally a runaway machinegun
    1
  68. Omar Torres lol "onlyweighs 28 pounds" you could have a barrett m82 for that weight or close to it
    1
  69. Omar Torres you could carry it alot easier than a real minigun thats 308/7.62x51 nato and put a stock and pistol grip instead of just a pistolgrip like in one of those games where its fired like a rocket launcher
    1
  70. Omar Torres 5.56 out of a minigun doesnt have to be that bad to be honest i mean if you got 50 rounds a second coming out of it its gonna do a ton of damage
    1
  71. Gallowglass its the old day lmg or suppressing fire weapon
    1
  72. The Rogue Wolf thats just common sense when its literally fully automatic after you do whatever the trigger mechanism is on that and you could just leave it and itll keep firing until its empty
    1
  73. Sérgio Henrique a beltan flintlock was more just a repeater cause you had to turn the barrel manually im pretty sure to fire the next round not even close to a machine gun or even if it had a semiauto mechanism still not a machinegun like this is i think ian explained it the best way that its a runaway machinegun cause you either fire all at once or nothing but it doesnt literally fire every bullet at once it which would make it volley fire it fires a sequence of bullets until its empty
    1
  74. Victor Waddell thatd be more dangerous cause then itd be raining bullets down on the people all around it
    1
  75. Why Jay doesnt have to be "selfloading" to be a machinegun its about how it fires when pulling the trigger you can pull it once and it shoots all the bullets or like nowadays machinguns you can control the fire by holding it down or taking your finger off the trigger and stopping it
    1
  76. 1337penguinman the real definition of a machine gun can be like this gun like ian said its a runaway machinegun not a controllable one that you can hold the trigger down and keep shooting or not when you let it go
    1
  77. Deux Voul yeah ok whatever you say bud ive heard everything you can say
    1
  78.  @jessicagray8852  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  79. TactaGhoul yep basically the only difference is a motor and modern cartridges and a huge fire rate and electrical on off button to fire it
    1
  80. Hitchhike the World it was ancient rocket powered arrows or just ancient rockets alone it was called a hwatcha or how ever you spell it
    1
  81. korblborp if its pressurized water it pushes all the powder out
    1
  82. Rrolf it is by legal definition of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull (which is complete bullcrap cause that would make a double barrel that fires two shells with one trigger a machine gun) when a real one keeps firing as the trigger is held down not two bullets then reload or anything else like that (thats the atfs interpretations for ya dumber than rocks)
    1
  83. Pitch Lock they had way better stuff than this in ww1 lol they wouldntve used this even desperate they had better last ditch guns
    1
  84. ya live and learn everyday and i kinda expected something like this to come up eventually and im glad it did it shows the liberals are full of crap not like i didnt know that before but still it just reinforces it
    1
  85. Mrjohnnymoo1 freedom keeps the peace not makes it more afngerous but i get what youre saying people should be armed
    1
  86. thesweatleaf it doesnt even matter what side did what to be honest trump claimed to be republican and pro second amendment his whole campaign and when he got in signed anti gun bill through exectutive order no less to make it even worse yet people think hes still on our side the first and second amendments are our best defense against tyranny and if hes trying to take either or both of those away in any increment then hes a big threat not a good guy at all
    1
  87. MrYfrank14 its not before democrats its before we let them take over with their unconstitutional bullcrap "laws" we shouldve just shot them on the spot even talking about banning inanimate objects but all the people on the government were the same way thats why they got passed anyone who actually believes in the second amendment doesnt want any regulation of any kind except you know people who do bad things with them go to jail or die because the good people would defend themselves against them
    1
  88.  @charlessmith6412  welcome if you're not being sarcastic or whatever
    1
  89.  @Bourikii2992  actually none are cause you can use pretty much anything to assault people with so it just makes it a stupid made up redundant word to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons i don't remember where it was but i think they even "banned" butter knives like you can't walk around with a butterknife on you for self defense or some other nonsense like that
    1
  90.  @Bourikii2992  the people are the militia not the government also it doesn't matter what you tell them they won't get it and will still say it can be limited or only if states allow you or the federal government or whatever that's the whole point of the second amendment is to fight back against tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that so if we dont use the second amendment it's useless to say we have it or any other rights for that matter
    1
  91.  @The_Lucent_Archangel  they know why they say it it's just to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons it's like why they call "hunting" bolt action rifles with scopes "sniper rifles" and stuff like that and semiautos fully semiautos cause they know their stupid followers will go by it without questioning it
    1
  92.  @samuellubell4557  no they don't
    1
  93.  @samuellubell4557  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  94. UK violent crime rate is 2x higher than USA's rate it is a dumb argument if you mean they didnt know technology would advance and this video is proof of that this is basically the minigun of that era and even looks like one the only thing its missing is cased cartridges and a motor to spin the barrels
    1
  95. Raymo_2_u this is literally like the mingun of its time i mean multiple barrels and 200 and something rounds all at once being fired when most people were using single loaded muskets
    1
  96. he made the original minigun lol
    1
  97. jason127x99 i dont think anybody classifies anything right or he had them classify it as that but he did try to ban it and i say try because it doesnt matter what anybody in the government says or classifies it as the second amendment makes it null and void any law that bans any weapon in any way cause it says the right of the people to keep and bear arms(which is weapons not firearms and its not short for firearms) shall not be infringed. period no ofs and or buts and an infringement is any limitation to any weapon or accessory because if you ban accessories you can ban all guns they would word it as any device that can fire a round would be banned therefore banning all guns
    1
  98. Kurt Jakins it could happen hes tested other really rare guns before also someone could build a replica
    1
  99. tm turn yours on there are guns even older than this that can still shoot and are shot by modern people lol😂👌🏻
    1
  100.  @trinova9581  but this one wasnt like that cause its basically just a bunch of musket barrels all put together so they fire all the rounds in it one after the other with one action of the flintlock which is the basic principle of a machinegun
    1