Youtube comments of Helium Road (@RCAvhstape).
-
1100
-
881
-
872
-
867
-
839
-
734
-
609
-
425
-
358
-
317
-
280
-
273
-
243
-
237
-
218
-
184
-
180
-
179
-
175
-
170
-
167
-
145
-
140
-
135
-
129
-
111
-
110
-
109
-
101
-
99
-
89
-
86
-
84
-
82
-
78
-
76
-
70
-
68
-
67
-
66
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
60
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
47
-
46
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
I'm going to love this series. When I was growing up, I read a book about Old Ironsides that, IIRC, was written for boys, and was very inspired by it. Later when I visited Annapolis and then Constitution herself, I had a deeper perspective of what I was seeing. Sadly, I'm not sure how many younger Americans (or of any age for that matter) are aware of this ship and its relevance to US history, but anyone who enjoys films like Master and Commander, pirate stories, Hornblower books, etc., would probably love to know the real stories about age of sail warfare.
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I was involved in field artillery years ago, and it was similar stuff. Each gun has its own logbook, and everything that is done with that weapon gets recorded. How many shells it fired, what the charges were, etc. These are all inputs to the computations, along with wind, temperature, humidity, and so on. The computations are mostly done with software, but, at least in my time, all artillerymen are trained to do things old school using firing tables and slide rule computers, which don't ever break down. The gunnery, when done right, is supper accurate. Batteries would sometimes write their name in the sky using illumination rounds and timed fusing at the end of a field exercise. The scariest thing I saw was a regimental time on target, when the entire 14th Marine artillery regiment timed all their guns to hit the same target at the same moment, resulting in a massive mushroom cloud. I'd hate to be on the wrong end of that.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
It's worse in the US Navy, where we name our spanking new nuclear carriers after politicians, some of whom are pretty obscure (how much of the public has any idea who John Stennis was?) or even still alive, instead of giving them proper USN names like Hornet, Ticonderoga, Wasp, Intrepid, etc. At least they plan to name a new one Enterprise again. All of our cool names go to amphibs and cruisers, which is okay, but still... At least the new frigates on order are to be given names from the old sailing frigates, such as Constellation.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Re. combining services: The US recently created a separate Space Force because the USAF wasn't adequately prioritizing space, which is to be expected since their main focus is strategic air power. As a separate service the Space Force now has its own budget to manage and doesn't have to compete with the F-35 or the next gen bomber, etc. Within the Department of the Navy, the USMC has its own air component, which, while still part of naval aviation, is focused on supporting its own Marines on the ground, freeing Navy air power to focus on actual naval warfare. Combining things may look good on paper, and sometimes it is good, but often it's more complicated than just saving money (looking at you, Robert McNamara.)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Great video. I've always been interested in this sort of thing. The United States east coast has a lot of old coastal fortifications which have now been turned into parks or museums. Some date back to the colonial days. During the War for Independence, when the British army occupied Philadelphia, the Americans made an effort to throttle the British supply lines by constructing a system of fortifications along the Delaware River south of Philly, consisting of Forts Mercer and Billingsport in New Jersey, and Fort Mifflin on the Pennsylvania side, with a set of submerged barrier obstacles strung between them across the river. The fire plan was apparently to get enemy ships caught in the barrier and then bombard them from the shore batteries. Fighting there resulted in at least one Royal Navy ship, the Augusta, running aground, catching fire, and being destroyed by a magazine explosion. Fort Mifflin stayed in service until well into the 20th Century as a US Army depot and is now a park next to the airport, while the other forts have been turned into parks as well. The forts saw intense combat, including land-based assaults.
While I understand you were focused on fixed coastal defenses, particularly those that were armed with guns, I think you might've spent a few more minutes at the end talking about modern coastal defenses. As you mentioned they consist mostly of mobile surface to surface missile launchers as well as other dynamic defenses such as aircraft and maritime patrol vessels, but they still have a large influence on planning for modern warfare. The example that immediately comes to mind is the Iranian defenses on the Strait of Hormuz, which are apparently designed to control the Strait or at least to try to deny use of it by potential adversaries. This has likely had an influence on US policy in the region, and at least some deterrent effect on war. The loss of an aircraft carrier or an amphibious ship would be a pretty major disaster for the US Navy, which faces numerous seaborne platforms and batteries of missiles in a very confined region, barely large enough to even operate a carrier.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If you search around you should be able to find interviews with Cunningham and Driscol where they describe the air battle that day, both back when they were still in the Navy and more recently since the 90s. Cunningham also wrote a shorty stor about it for a book about fighter pilots. Driscol, IIRC, still talks to Navy pilots about air combat tactics, or did for a long while, anyway. Cunningham got stupid, went into politics, elected to the US Senate, and sent to prison for a while for corruption. But the story of the fight that day is still amazing. They became the only Navy aces of the Vietnam War that day, having two kills going into the mission and coming with three more. Their Phantom was falling apart as they raced for the sea, knowing they would have to eject, trying to get over water so the Navy could rescue them after they punched out, and they barely made it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I am an American but I watch lots of British TV shows and movies, as well as subscribe to several British Youtubers such as Mark Felton, Techmoan, and Drachinifel, so as a result I enjoy the differences in pronunciation, spelling, and vocabulary. Potato chips vs. crisps, french fries vs. chips, trucks vs. lorries, trash can vs. skip, color vs. colour, aluminum vs. aluminium, etc. I also like the way Brits often end a sentence with "yeah", as in, "We've got to get this job finished, yeah?", whereas an American might use the word "right" or something. Some British slang took me a while to decipher; in one TV show a woman says a teapot is "minging" and that they might get "minginitus". I paused it and looked it up, took me a while to figure out that "mingy" is British slang for "nasty" or "dirty" or "crusty", and thus she was saying the teapot was old and rusty or dirty. Watching Canadian TV is a bit weird, because Canadian English is just North American English with a regional accent, but they use a lot of British words and spelling and so on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The book is so much better than even the best of the films, mainly because the Martians, while unbeatably tough, are not invincible, and do take damage from soldiers and sailors with the guts to stand up and fight them. It's always fun to speculate how the Martians would fare against other ships, such as, for example, a Ticonderoga class guided missile cruiser, popping off Martian tripods at long range with Standard missiles, or Fletcher class destroyers, peppering the tripods with 5" shells.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Great video, Drach, and thank you Dr. Scholes! While most comparisons of gun ships compare speed, armor, and firepower, I think it's important to remember how vitally important the other technologies are, especially the fire control systems. For example, people always compare the Iowas to the Yamatos in fantasy matchups, but do they factor in the differences in radar, computers, and precision of the gun-pointing mechanisms? I'd like to see you talk about the Japanese fire control tech in a future video (and German, Italian, etc. as well).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Interesting. The only digital camera I ever bought is a Fujifilm in 2004. It's a 6MP, which was decent for the time, and has tons of features, but it's one major flaw is that it has horrible shutter lag. Any film camera blows it away in that one department. I never bought another digital camera, though, my smartphone does the job. Ironically I shoot film as a hobby and love the old beautiful vintage cameras. Film is now a niche art medium. Fujifilm film is still one of the best quality films on the market. I still use Kodak Tri-X film, too, but I don't think it's actually made by Kodak anymore, rather it's made under license using Kodak's formula, or so I've heard. Kodak film has also become unreasonably expensive, which, in a market chock full of films to choose from, is not good.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't know about other services, but the US Marines teach their guys a technique to use your pants as a life preserver. You take them off, tie the ends of the legs together, put them behind your head, and use your belt to attach the pants to your waist upside down so the open part of the pants is facing the water in front of you. Periodically, you swish water, and air along with it, into the open part of the trousers and then hold that part just under the surface. The soaked pant legs will actually hold air pretty well for a while, and the whole thing allows you to stay afloat much easier. I was trained to do it and it works really well. Not as good as a real life vest, but way better than nothing at all. In 1995 Lance Cpl. Zachary Mayo fell overboard off the USS America in the Indian Ocean and used this technique to survive for 36 hours before being picked up by Pakistani fishermen. Here's the story: https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19951130&slug=2155247
Also, one thing I was taught was that you have to maintain a positive attitude if you want to survive. No matter how grim things look, don't give up. You may or may not survive, but if you give up you are doomed for sure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1