Comments by "KpCraftster" (@kpcraftster6580) on "No. Linux does not have 4% marketshare. Hate to break it to ya." video.

@TheSwissGabber You wrote "you", when you meant to write "I". You're welcome.
3
Steam os hardly qualifies as an operating system in its present state, and it certainly is no linux distro. And the steam deck is more of a mobile device than a laptop, never mind a desktop.
3
The more people use linux on desktop, the more people will realize how miserable of an experience it is (especially such "beginner-friendly" trainwrecks as mint, zorin, manjaro, etc), and the better the odds that someone will finally put in some time and effort into improving it.
2
@kneekoo Strong words there. They're also nonsense because it looks like you project your limited experience to everyone's. It's like you can't imagine people having used linux for long enough to realize it is actively and deliberately getting worse over time. But then of course, you are the one recommending mint of all things, quite possibly the worst distro out there, so of course you haven't and can't imagine anyone else has.
2
@bobowon5450 Knock on wood to keep it that way, because when you do 😮‍💨 Mint: easy to break, nigh impossible to to fix - a sloppily thrown together and poorly documented blackbox with the worst support of any distro out there
2
@gridbro Which bit exactly? Steam os is limited in its utility. If we consider that an operating system then graphing calculators also have operating systems. In fact, in that case, we should say everything with any firmware has an operating system: printers, scanners, copiers, microwave ovens, you name it. If we consider steam os a linux distro, then that would imply anything that uses any linux code is linux, no matter how libre or proprietary, open or closed source: chrome os, android, etc. The steam deck is like an iot gameboy, it is an internet connected device for spying on you masquerading as a handheld gaming console.
2
@gridbro That is not what a linux distro is. At best you could then argue it is a unix compatible derivative. And the linux foundation say a lot of things. Never anything sensible, mind you, just much. If you want to check how much little they know about linux, check how much little they spend on it.
1
@gridbro Wrong. They spends maybe 400 thousand USD on it. Id est, they spend less than 2% of their revenue on it. Despite claiming to be "The Linux Foundation ™". I probably beat that percentage. How about you, 🤡?
1
@gridbro You know what, fine, I'll give you the benefit. That would still only be 2.9% spent on Linux by something pretending to be "The Linux Foundation ™". I probably spend that much on free and open-source software without pretending to be the body responsible for it. More if I value my time. And since you are asking about my personal finances, what about you? Do you spend 2.9% of your revenue on linux? On FOSS collectively? And when you take into account that time is money?
1
@gridbro I don't make sense? Says the one who believes android is a linux distro because a foundation that has hardly anything to do with linux says it is...
1
@gridbro Nor do you (call the shots on what android is), and "The Linux Foundation ™ " certainly doesn't.
1
@mytech6779 Either you tagged the wrong person, or you meant to write "I" instead of "you". But I agree, you should have stayed in school. Let's both pray you're never in any of my courses. Though I doubt you'll ever make it to grad school.
1