Comments by "Gen Ohmni" (@KingOhmni) on "Rick Scott, Always the Authoritarian, Signs Doomed Anti-Gun Legislation" video.

  1. 156
  2. 22
  3. 6
  4. Ancient Mindset The establishment does not want it and the average person is blinded by things like the memory of Dunblaine and recurrent mass shootings in America let alone the other anti gun propaganda. So Brexit in of itself will not yield a second coming of guns in the hands of law abiding Britons however if the powers that be continue to unequally apply the law of the land regarding the indigenous Vs newcomers then the demand to own guns will grow. So what I think is that demographic shift thanks to Merkel Madness and misplaced altruism leading to increased violent crime will at least inflame latent narratives about citizen gun ownership in Europe and Britain. Also the media likes to portray Britain as pretty much gun free outside of a few criminals - a growing number mind - Armed Response (read SWAT) and farmers. Well my friend took me clay pigeon shooting recently and I was pleasantly surprised to realise that just my ex-industrial revolution town has multiple thousands of shotgun license holders. Britain is far from being gun free; we are however drowning in il-liberal madness that has stacked up since the times of Enoch Powell. Oh and fun fact. Britain is a more murderous nation that America per capita, it's just done with knives, bats and hammers ie more barbarically. Bonus fact. Violent crime, just like Australia, spiked off the back of the legislation passed off the back of Dunblaine that amounted to the law abiding handing their guns in while the criminals did not. Who'd a funk it. Bottom line, more people than ever are talking about gun ownership than have done for a number of decades but it is still a very small minority of the British population. But all this said. Sovereignty would mean if the will existed Briton's could have their guns, through a process of Parliamentary representation, back so in a theoretical sense Brexit could provide the legal mechanism for a return of guns to Britain but it is very theoretical thanks to secondary reaction politics meaning Britain thinks the answer to the problem of acid attacks in London is to increase regulations on acids...or that the fact stop and search policies result in more black people being stopped than any other ethnicity but they are the demographic growing the gang culture that fuels the issue of knife attacks in London and then there are the Muslims. Don't get me started. This, Britain, is a Christian nation (I am not Christian BTW) and Sharia Law has no place in it.
    4
  5. Chris. This is the comment that I left on Styx's second video today - Trump Pardons Kristian Saucier, My Fellow Vermonter. The comment relates to your question. The Founding Fathers left Britain to escape the tyranny of English Common Law being usurped by Rich law and they did their best to prevent another fine set of Laws from being usurped across the generations by powerful and moneyed interests. Truly freedom must be fought for across the generations but beware, our overlords have given us a level of comfort secured by strong men that have been designed to spawn weak times which produce meek people who create hard times by allowing the tyrant into their homes even as they argue for the imposition of the Tyrant into YOUR home. The Magna Carta once had a section that spoke about Lawful Rebellion, called Article 61, wherein it can be said a state of tyranny exists in the land through unequal application of the law and one can lawfully rebel against this by swearing allegiance to The Crown even as you refuse to pay taxes. Through this mechanism the people can depreive a tyrannical State from it's life force of money however. Once the Barons that held their collective swords to the then King's throat got what they wanted in the wording of the Magna Carta, namely a securing of their classes existence and rights at the same time as the serfdom class, they accepted that they had broke the Vatican Convention on things being signed under duress and let the Article slip after but 2 years of being on the books. We The People need an avenue to deny the Globalists their blood and debt based money and I believe the archaic article 61 provides a framework that would motivate The State to apply The Law equally. So how does all this relate to the video in question? Do you really think Hillary would be walking freely about America if Lawful Rebellion was in place? Let alone all the examples of indigenous peoples being treat differently to the captured voting bloc as represented by illegal economic migrants that make up the so called refugee narrative. See Hate Crimes Laws being rolled out across Europe to see how it will be one rule for them and another rule for you, the people, if you are not careful in combating the machinations of the Frankfurt School descendants.
    4
  6. 4
  7. 2