Comments by "ootmaster1" (@ootmaster1) on "The Leftists' Race War Fantasy" video.
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
@raybod1775 no, you are in fact wrong
nation (n.)
c. 1300, nacioun, "a race of people, large group of people with common ancestry and language," from Old French nacion "birth, rank; descendants, relatives; country, homeland" (12c.) and directly from Latin nationem (nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe," literally "that which has been born," from natus, past participle of nasci "be born" (Old Latin gnasci), from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget," with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.
The word is used in English in a broad sense, "a race of people an aggregation of persons of the same ethnic family and speaking the same language," and also in the narrower sense, "a political society composed of a government and subjects or citizens and constituting a political unit; an organized community inhabiting a defined territory within which its sovereignty is exercised."
a nation is its people, and therefore, is racial in nature
4
-
4
-
4
-
@raybod1775
"you don’t seem to know anything about the history of the United States."
Yeah buddy, sure, i could say the same for you
"The vast majority of immigrants came after the country was founded"
uh, no, the " vast majority" of immigrants came AFTER 1965.... but you totally know more about US history than i do so you should know that
"Before the U.S. became a nation, it consisted of British colonies which became states, which formally became the United States with the signing of the Constitution about 221 years ago."
Yeah, and it was nearly all european....funny, it stayed almost entirely european until 1965... but you should know that...
"It was really like the EU and really didn’t start to become a country until the Civil War and especially after World War I and the Great Depression.
seems like a pretty arbitrary point to say it wasnt a country till then..
"Of course the U.S. expanded with former French and Spanish possessions and absorbed all the people within those lands."
and what does this have do do with anything?
"I’m not saying the Native Americans didn’t get a raw deal."
what does this have to do with the discussion? you can pretend that "natives" were one cohesive group, but that would be historically inaccurate. also most of them didnt have concepts of " owning" property,
"Don’t forget pre-European Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, India as well as others that were nation/empires, not homelands before Ancient Rome was founded. Europe outside of the Mediterranean areas were homelands, but all that changed over the last two thousand years."
and what the absolute f does that have to do with current day demographic change?
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1