Comments by "redfish337" (@redfish337) on "Why Japanese Idols Suffer After Retiring [ENG CC]" video.

  1. 6
  2. 6
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. ​ @errorys4183  Idols existed long before the 1980s. But J-pop as a genre didn't exist until around 1989. It's called Kayoukyoku or Showa Era Pop. I don't know where Pink Lady and such actually sort, but in terms of who actually gets sorted into 女性アイドル at stores, that pretty much starts from Morning Musume (1997) due to the relative dearth of idols after at least one suicide and an attempted suicide were the death knell to the Showa idol system at the end of the '80s, fairly clearly delineating the eras. Especially since they had an Emperor change in 1989, the first in over 60 years, and first since the war. Oh yeah, and the bubble burst around the same time. So there's definitely a before and after the early '90s in the Japanese mindset. MAX and SPEED and such showed a revival was coming with Momusu, but still are usually sorted as plain J-pop. De facto, the word has shifted. Almost all groups are born by way of Akiba style of AKB48 or Momoiro Clover. H!P is still active and regained popularity so it is still included despite some older methods. And 48 and Stardust both had to adapt to having larger fanbases than they were perhaps designed for. As for idols who play: Bandjanaimon Ai Oke While it disbanded recently, Minyou Girls had a shamisen. Probably others but I don't know every group out there. And also disbanded are some two way groups- PASSPO which ran more idol than band and Rurirori which was the opposite. The idol festival system isn't conducive to instruments- turnaround from one group to the next can be 30 seconds or less since usually 3 groups get a 20 minute set each hour and any wasted time means you only get to do 3 songs instead of 4. Nevertheless, such groups exist and that breaks that definition. And BANMON has multiple MV with millions of hits so they are significant.
    3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. "Does being an idol mean you work within a specific set of the music industry?" Yes. At least in this context of idols. What that actually is is hard to define though. "Women who continue to work as performers after age 25, does just continuing to perform mean they are still "idols"" If they were idols before and are still doing the same thing they are still idols after 25. Honestly, 30 is the more appropriate number these days, and that's still just a soft cap- I could find you ten over 30 with no trouble and many more with some scouring of the Internet. A lot of ones who know they're in it for the long haul don't publish their birth year in the first place so you don't even know if they pass 30 or not. The first girl debuted before the idol boom and didn't really have many examples to look at. The big company around the turn of the century mostly had people leave by 25. "or do they have to be working for specific talent and booking agencies?" Not exactly. They can be self-produced and still be idols. Again, basically every point you could use to define idols has a counterexample so defining is hard. The term includes national groups all the way down to those with like 20 fans afterall. Below the super mainstream, basically all of them perform at events where they get a 15-30 minute slot, and then go outside the main hall to do fan meetings for an hour, where it's understood that they will be getting most of their money for the day. Having good music means having more fans so it's not like the music means nothing but at the end of the day the fan meetings pay the bills.
    2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1