Comments by "" (@rogerphelps9939) on "Epstein files: Prince Andrews’s reputation will be ‘besmirched again’" video.

  1. Nothing much other than obvious rhyming slang.
    3
  2. And how does he simply have to go? His title Prince Andrew was bestowed on him by the accident of his birth so that cannot fo anyway.
    2
  3. What?
    2
  4. Hang on a minute. He is in a jurisdiction where the age of consent is over 16 and screws a 17 year old. It takes two to tango and he is guilty of no criminal offence.
    2
  5. No he was not. He was in various hospitals "working " as a volunteer porter. That was perfect cover for his disgusting deeds.
    2
  6. Savile was not a BBC employee. He was an independent contractor with an agent etc dust like countless so called celebrities nowadays. @tonep3168 
    2
  7. They really are backward denying reality over there in the nutty US. @LordOfLight 
    1
  8. These "revelations" provide nothing new. It is going to make next to no difference to anyone's reputation.
    1
  9. Just took legal advice. @scottyfive4319 
    1
  10. "His innocence". Sometim es lawyers advise paying up to put an end to it.Remember the payment was made without perjudice, i.e. admission of any guilt of a criminal offence. @scottyfive4319 
    1