Comments by "Willoughby Krenzteinburg" (@willoughbykrenzteinburg) on "Apollo 17 - The Last Men on the Moon | Part 2 | Free Documentary History" video.

You'd just deny that mission, too. Your opinion on the matter is meaningless.
5
Take your phone out on a clear night and take a picture of the moon. Tell me if there are stars in that photograph......
3
@sawboneiomc8809 Arguments like this are idiotic. There's a legitimate reason you don't hear these sounds. But let's take a moment and assume - - for the sake of argument - - that the missions were all fake. Now, ask yourself the same question. Why don't you hear those sounds?
2
What reaction do you expect from the astronauts from seeing the exact same stars you can see every night on a clear night? That said, astronauts have in fact commented on how many stars they could see while on the far side of the moon completely away from any ambient light. They noticed the stars. It's patently absurd to assume they didn't. If nothing else, if you had any knowledge of how these missions worked, you'd know that they - on several occasions - had to take sightings of stars in order to align the guidance platform so the computer knew which way it was pointing. Your comment serves no other purpose other than to just embarrass you. You have no clue what you're talking about. As for what we did with the experience, well for one, you're using it right now to read this comment.
2
There is a program called Artemis. Artemis I has already flown. It was unmanned, orbited the moon and came back. Artemis II will fly a similar mission but with astronauts on board. Artemis III plans to land men on the moon for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972.
1
@rockethead7 Hadn't heard that. Bummer.
1
Also, when you use stage lights, the light gets dimmer the farther you get from it. This is a fundamental concept of physics. Light falls off. Quite predictably actually. There is something knows as the inverse square law of light falloff. This means that something twice as far away from a light source is 1/2² as bright (or 1/4th as bright). Something three times farther from the light source is 1/9th as bright. Something 10 times farther from the light source is 1/100th as bright. In ALL the scenes, all objects cast ONE and ONLY ONE shadow. It is not possible for multiple light sources to be used. There is rover footage where they drive THOUSANDS of yards or several miles even Uncut footage taken by a camera mounted on the rover. All objects casting one shadow.....and the scenes being absolutely uniformly lit. The only feasible light source that would be far enough away to negate the effects of the inverse square law of light falloff - - - - - and be bright enough to light the scenes so bright - - - - is the sun - 93 million miles away.
1
Using all caps just makes you look like a lunatic. Nixon didn't talk to the astronauts by phone both ways. His phone was patched into the radio band the astronauts were using. Nixon was on a phone; the astronauts were using radio. The CIA had nothing to do with the lunar missions. If they left a camera on the moon facing Earth, would you suddenly accept the lunar missions? Nope. This is just nonsensical garbage that you think makes your argument stronger. It doesn't. It makes you look retarded....
1