Comments by "Cupid Stunt" (@Cupid-Stunt) on "Suspicious emails reveal Kerry office wanted budget info off paper" video.

  1.  @sheilafuller3899  Part and parcel of any act of declassification is communicating that act to all others who possess the same information, across all federal agencies. This point holds true regardless of whether the information exists in a document, an email, a power point presentation, and even in a government official’s mental awareness. Otherwise, what would be the point of a legitimate declassification?” This makes sense to me on multiple levels (both logical and bureaucratic). If the point of classification is ultimately information control, then it’s critical to have a system to track that information’s status (Johnson notes earlier in the article that “it is important to note that documents themselves are not classified; it is the substance of the information contained therein that is classified.”)
    2
  2.  @rkm5369  Why?
    1
  3.  @sheilafuller3899  The 3 charges being sought by the DOJ do not require the docs are classified
    1
  4. Evil's pact with stupidity!
    1
  5.  Nick Porter  You watch them?
    1
  6.  @im2tweaked  Who is Stelter?
    1
  7.  @im2tweaked  Who is Stelter?
    1
  8.  @im2tweaked  Why would I know who this Stelter is?
    1
  9.  @im2tweaked  2 more posts and I have the 5 needed to demonstrate you are stalking again.
    1
  10.  @im2tweaked  Part and parcel of any act of declassification is communicating that act to all others who possess the same information, across all federal agencies. This point holds true regardless of whether the information exists in a document, an email, a power point presentation, and even in a government official’s mental awareness. Otherwise, what would be the point of a legitimate declassification?” This makes sense to me on multiple levels (both logical and bureaucratic). If the point of classification is ultimately information control, then it’s critical to have a system to track that information’s status (Johnson notes earlier in the article that “it is important to note that documents themselves are not classified; it is the substance of the information contained therein that is classified.”)
    1
  11.  @im2tweaked  OK, have I posted lies or disinformation in this thread?
    1
  12.  @im2tweaked  I have no issue being called out if it is proven that I have lied or mislead in one of my posts.
    1
  13.  @im2tweaked  1) You use 20 million barrels a day / 7.3 Billion barrels a year 2) You produce 11 million barrels a day 3) Your proven reserves are 35 billion barrels The rest is maths a 10 year old in the UK could work out. a) How much oil must you import to meet your daily requirements? (By day, year and percentage.) b) How long will your proven reserves last without imports? (In Years) c) Are you oil independent? (Yes or No) My answers a) 9 million barrels, 3.3 billion ,45% b) 10 with imports, only 5 without c) No
    1
  14.  @im2tweaked  "proven" matters I can pull Rystad into little pieces EIA quotes not on the EIA website are many and fake You have access to google? 24hrs should be enough time?
    1
  15. US proven oil reserves will run out in 10 years. 1) You use 20 million barrels a day / 7.3 Billion barrels a year 2) You produce 11 million barrels a day 3) Your proven reserves are 35 billion barrels The rest is maths a 10 year old in the UK could work out.
    1