Youtube comments of Mark Armage (@markarmage3776).
-
816
-
624
-
381
-
258
-
194
-
182
-
153
-
153
-
152
-
141
-
130
-
109
-
106
-
94
-
88
-
88
-
85
-
80
-
75
-
71
-
66
-
64
-
63
-
61
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
51
-
50
-
49
-
42
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
What? The judge denied an arrest warrant, basically, you don't even have a case against him.
Drugs? Where is the proof? Text messages can't be used as proofs, study some law.
And the drugs, here, take a good look at history.
Michael Jackson child sexual abuse, R kelly child sexual abuse.
The Beatles using LSD, a drug to write songs.
Demi Lovato drugs issue
Steve Jobs using LSD and Marijuana extensively during his youth
Drake used drugs, cocaine
Mel B from Spice Girls admitting to using drugs.
I don't know what kind of school did you graduate from, I suggest going back, kid. You damn hypocrites.
Unless you're paying YG for their moral classes, I suggest sticking the music, idiots.
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
It's not he said, she said, it's she said, they said. They hear are all of the named "witness", saying that it didn't happen. Graham even stated this clear in the hearing, what kind moron is this Cuomo guy? Go back to selling insurance. Here are the actual facts that Cuomo did not mention, because he doesn't what they are, it have to be relevant truth to be count as facts.
She provided no information, what prosecutor could file for a warrant? Tell me who, how? No credible information, no witnesses who support her claims. No one, not even her best friend. And that says more than screening a false assumption like what CNN did here.
FBI Investigation doesn't come up with conclusion, what do you expect to happen if you get an investigation, which you clearly don't believe to be credible, when you're holding back all of the known allegations for 2 months?
Those are real facts. Despicable CNN, instead of bowing down respectfully to truth, reasons, and intelligent, they keep getting more desperate.
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
Who are these idiots ? No parts of this video mentioned anything valid about the actual case.
Here's a summary,
A person puts forward an allegation after she had thought about it, which has no weight at all.
Next, they claim that some people say that it's in "the pattern", which is an extremely vauge judgement on anything considering how we don't know what the pattern is and whether does those people know Kavanagh at all to be commenting on those things. So again, no weight.
And they add another part on how anybody defending Kavanagh is colluding, also with no proof, therefore, again, it's useless.
This isn't a piece, it's not a story, it's an even more pathetic attempt to delay. And even if everything this guys reported is true, the fact would still be that out of all the witness that are actually there at the party where nobody know what happens at, all of them are confirming that it doesn't happen. So CNN, go sell insurance, because you're just fake news.
15
-
15
-
A version of history recognized by literally no one. If Kievan Rus is the earliest State, the sovereignty over the entirety of Kievan Rus territory lies with the eventual Tsardom of Russia, hence Russian Empire, at least the "Russian" part of the empire, and of course Russia.
The capital of Kievan Rus moved from Novgorod to Kiev, such as the move of the ruling family, the Rurik Dynasty and then after Kievan Rus fell, the ruling family moved again to Moscow and their kingdom remains there till today.
Rus does means Russia, or Russia is the most powerful and the most legitimate successor to the Rus name. Deal with it, this is recognized history by over 80% of global population.
Lithuanian did not liberate the Rus land, Lithuanian took over and conquered it for a period of time, in case you don't know, the Polish and Lithuania Commonwealth is of course another war waging kingdom that took territories by force. And that part was purchased back by the Russian "Empire", buying back their own rightful territory.
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
That kind of argument is one of the dumbest argument one can think of. Because Russia is a gigantic place with countless people.
And whatever your experience is, it can never be summarized to represent the entirety of it's population. That's like a person living in Los Angeles claiming they know what it's like in the United States as a whole without ever recognizing details within the country that they don't know or intentionally ignored.
Why don' you get over yourself?
Everyone else other than you, seemingly in Russia and most of the world, by the way, knows that NATO is a hostile organization. Because they have demonstrated hostile intentions and hostile actions long before any of Putin aggressive action.
You ignored 20 years before the Georgia invasion. With the hostile expansion of NATO in 1999, breaking the very well known 1991 promise of the US, the hostile bombing of a Russian ally in Serbia also in 1999. The seriously hostile use of military force to kill over one million people over false claim in Iraq by the US, which is the undisputed leader of NATO in 2003. And then the even more hostile NATO expansion in 2004, and then even more hostile provocation at Munich Security Conference in 2008, asking Georgia and Ukraine to join NATO.
You ignored every provocation and hostile action of NATO, mainly the US for 20 years to lie to yourself. Again, why don't you get over yourself?
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
He is not the best dancer in K-pop, kid, the most artistic one maybe, maybe but that's another type of dance. EXO movement are weak, so is BTS, so is the majority of nowaday boygroup, they're not really dancing, it's just moving to look like dancing, you can call that dancing but you need to distinguish that those dance move are far less demanding than the dance moves as such of TVXQ or 2PM. Girl groups dance never backed down from their previous difficulty, everytime there's a slide move while standing up straight, they're actually move their entire body weight using one leg because that knee has to sustain the weight throughout the body bending.
Male group do slides while bowing down, that's easier because you don't move during the slides.
Do some actual dancing.
Don't be an idiot, kid.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
That was Scorsese putting it mildly. His real expression behind it is quite clear
" Those movies are poorly written, poorly directed and expensive, yet people rush there and act as if that's the pinnacle of the movie industry, so it is a new type of art form that cashes in on people low standard, but that's something to be afraid of rather then celebrated "
Movies are expression of people, aesthetic, spiritual, emotional revelation. Marvel movies are expression of the poor souls who took a liking to it. Not that sane, not that complicated, not that highly ranked traditionally.
Huge fight, big bangs, roll credits, after credits, give me your money. They're like Disneyland, overrated and ridiculously expensive.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
samsa deniz Is it something worth risking your career??? The industry is built on chances, also, sexual harassment is not a crime, especially after 20 years, why do you think they waited 20 years, they use Weinstein, it's the "harassment" that gave them the advantage, without Weinstein, non of them would be heard, they would be nobody, so before talking about moral standards, use your brain to figure out that the whole " come out thing" is based on immoral actions
8
-
@bobdonda Sorry, but you're just a really stupid person, pal. The laws needs to based on actual principles, norms to be count as a law. Yours aren't based on anything.
You support on what basis? The basis of slavery is considering human as property, what norm goes against that? All human are equal? If you are against slavery then you're also against abortion. The fetus is count as a human, human DNA, stage of human body, traits of a human being.
Use your brain, it's not your choice if the biological feature of your body goes against your will. Men doesn't want to die on the battlefield but we have to, so deal with it. It's an absurd thing when we gave women the right to vote even though they don't have to register for the draft. So when you go against the basis of human being, it's no longer your right or choice, that concept can only exist when you've accepted the norm. Use your brain.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I think 2000 years of failure in invading Vietnam probably taught them a lesson. The same goes with Korea.
Taiwan doesn't belong to China because it used to belong to China. Taiwan belongs to China because it has always belong to China and the Chinese people. Overwhelming, extreme majority of history, it belongs to the Chinese people, aka tha Han race, speaking Mandarin, celebrate Chinese Festivals and customs. They are the same people separated by a civil war of ideology, they're not 2 separate set of people.
Come on, man, go learn some math. That island has and always will be part of China. On Taiwan itself, there are 2 set of opinions, one wants independence, but the other one, a significant one, maybe even the majority wants to rejoin China mainland.
Why don't you show some respect?
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Okay, so any public figures shouldn't be treated as human. Obama, Clinton shouldn't be respected right? They're public figures.
So is JFK, Lincoln, Roosevelt.
Go back to school, kid. You're embarassing yourself, protesting is one thing, first, you need to do it peacefully, as in not using violence, and you need to have a point.
The group above has none of those things, and so do you. Try to think of things he had said in the last year, what's wrong with them? Do you have a point? We didn't burn Hillary alive when she betrayed the trust of the country, when Monsieur Bill Clinton allegedly raped all of those womens. Go back to school, kid.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
The average household income had stayed flat and even after the pandemic, stock prices goes up. I think it's pretty clear to see that those stocks are paid for with debt, not assets.
And when the debt comes due, it will crash. Miraculous expansion while doing less and less business in everyway is the proof itself. Something that can't go on forever will eventually end, and it will be tragic for most people, but an opportunity for countless others.
People are dumb and they are scared, they will hope for the crash to be short, or not happening at all, and they will buy, resulting in a bounce, when it bounce yet goes down anyway, they will panic and they start to sell, because they paid for those stocks with either debt or leverage which will close their position when it goes down.
Party's over, people, keep up with the time. Stock market growth without any growth in business is a zero sum game, because when it crash, somebody will take the losses.
7
-
Eternal Star Really? A society with no law enforcement shall have no crime?
Where do you live? Because in every place in the world without sufficient law enforcement, it's quite dangerous.
Like I said, Brazilian slumdog, pal, without law enforcement, it's not a society of law anymore, you think people have this hidden compassion where they won't hurt you to get what they want?
Go ahead, go to Africa, go to Columbia, go to these paradise, law enforcement there don't care, so there must be less crime, right?
You go risk your life there first before you ask other people to risk theirs, okay.
The only reason you're not killing each other is because there are consequences if you do so.
This is basic logic, in a world where you can get away with anything, all people succumb to their primitive desire, this is not an assumption it's a fact, the people who went to the place of no law enforcement to test it usually do not return alive.
The former territory of ISIS has no police, they must be safe, correct?
Don't take my word for it, go live at those places, places where you can be raped and no law enforcement agencies shall care, those place are so safe that people are fleeing.
A society without police is a society without law enforcement, without law enforcement, there is no law except the law of force, tribal war, if these philosophy talks are too complicated for you, watch the TV series "The Walking Dead", even Hollywood hypocrites know what happens without law and order.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@thecalmbro No, watching too much TV or gambling is an indirect cause.
If gambling can make somebody looses their conscious mind or overdose, it would definitely be illegal.
Your last statement is a baseless assumption. Because the argument of arresting people who do drugs is because society as a whole does not tolerate it is just as valid.
Drugs is illegal almost everywhere in the world, even in countries that don't grow it and have only one kind of race.
So your argument fell apart, kid. Learn real history.
We don't make the drug war because we need to lock up poor people, we make the drug war with the attempt to help poor people, scare them off the drugs and start doing the work. But unfortunately, the reason they can't get out of the drugs is the exact reason why they're poor.
Shocking, isn't it. It's easier to say that they go after the drugs to oppress people then to say that the drug is bad and you're a weak, dumb person who can't live without it.
Get a better sense of dignity, genius. The nonsense of the drug war is made to oppress minorities?
In Phillipines, Malaysia, Vietnam, China, the majority of the drugs criminals are the majority ethnicity. So your argument fell apart.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@fowfow7119 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiprVX4os2Y
Instead of reading from Wikipedia, which lacks a lot of information, and even quote the wrong information. Why don't you dare to argue the real value?
If that southern strategy was a thing, how the hell did zero Democrats senator in those Southern state got demoted within the following 30 years of the Civil Right Movement?
Stop living a myth, dummy.
The only thing that shift is the geographical location of the people, the Republican policy didn't change, the racist people stayed, but tons of not racist people moved in.
However, the Democrats strategy changed, instead of dealing with racism against black, they deal with racism against white, that's why the White racist vote for Republican, we don't need to pander to them, they vote for us because the Democrats needed a new type of racism as base and abandon them. Wake up, pal.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Heevoice Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
Spinning isn't the hard part, physic wise, the hard part is minimal body movement to show effortlessness in dance moves, that also decrease the body capability of generating strength, and that's only happen with female dance.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@bigmitchtv3922 Yeah, not really, buddy. Modern civilization of the overwhelming majority of the world has absolutely nothing to do with Greek or Rome.
Because the overwhelming majority of the world, most specifically India and China have their own history and their own system of politics.
Now that might hurt your feelings, but that's the truth, especially the Chinese, if there was a fight, both on land and at sea, the Chinese Empire would have destroyed the Romans. The population size difference is gigantic, even in ancient times.
Roman Empire is one single place conquering and forcing others into servitude, while China really is one cohesive unity, at least in national identity.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@zip91413 First of all, your logic is false. Black lives matter was never about bringing attention to police activities, it's about nonsensical racism and encouraging violence against police officers. Black people are more likely to get shot not because intentionally racism, idiot, even white men got shot, just not as often, something might be relevant to the fact that 13% of the population is accountable for 40% of the crime. Learn some math.
And about the red hat, stop yelling racism, pal, it's getting old. Maybe go back to school and learn something useful, maybe math, that's the first step to Star Trek and also the first step to realize how stupid your argument is.
6
-
You can't claim people are "intelligent" if you can't point out the reason why they're intelligent,
like how I point out why she is stupid by following points:
This administration isn't anti immigration, it's anti illegal immigration, she falsely bashing people at 2:18
She claimed that it's not about the wall or border security, yet they won't give out any bills for the wall to see whether Trump will sign it, he asked for the wall, she claimed it's not about the wall, how the hell would she know this? Psychic? Huh? Use your brain
This is not shut down for not getting what "we want", it's shut down for the most important norm of all, Security, try to live in a house with no walls, see how safe you are then.
A piece of advice, kid. Go back to school.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
How old are you, kid? Finish school first before typing nonsensical stuff online.
If you're those BTS 7th grader philosophical morons, I suggest going back to class.
Here, a little bit of history and math, learn it.
People who used drugs, built a lot of things that you're using. WW2 soldiers, WW1 soldiers, Steve Jobs, The Beatles, Michael Jackson, Queen, Spice Girls,.....
Prostitution is about 1% of Korea GDP, which means it's the source of income, way to live for hundreds of thousands. If you add everything related to entertainment, which is K-Pop and more, that would be the size of the prostitution industry.
The public is just bashing people to feel good about themselves, I suggest you learn something morally correct, how about not being a hypocrite?
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Britannic hayyomatt No, the problem with you, kid, is that you can't distinguish between actual norms and your own norms. Not the other way around, your right in the real world isn't defined by your definition of anything, it is defined by what others decide what it is. That's how a society is formed.
Womens aren't affected that much in war, kid. Losing a husband isn't the same as getting shot, want to know why? Study Geography, there's a specific chapter on population pointing ot why the gender structure can be balanced even though people have more preference to boys. Guess what? Wars killed a few millions of men, not women. Bombing? Kid, if there are bombing, they kill all people, not just the women, 10 soldiers = 1 nurse, nice try, kid. A movie recommendations? Too see whether medic in the fields are women or men, idiot.
You're arguing the basis of life on an absolute basis, and that's just ridiculous. Here's the shortened version for you, if you want your baseless opinion be taken into account, then others baseless opinion shall also be taken into account, a serial killer wish to kill you as he doesn't consider you life is okay, right? Different opinion, true? Use your brain, unless you. An unknown, probably not that smart person can come up with an absolute definition with actual proof to form a new society that allows for random killing based on opinions, then we, the smart ones shall followed the previously agreed rules of the free world. Which is clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, which we're compassion enough to include you in it, protecting your right to live, your right to liberty and your right to pursue happiness even though you think that you have no such rights, as in how you decided that laws varied in individual.
If it's too long, here's the shortened of the shortened version. IF YOU DON'T CONSIDER A FETUS A LIFE, AND THAT'S THE ONLY BASIS FOR YOUR ARGUMENT, SO THINK WHY SHOULD WE CONSIDER YOU A LIFE, IF WE DON'T CONSIDER YOU A LIFE, WE CAN JUST KILL YOU?
You'll probably be desperate enough to type something totally irrelevant to the question trying to save face, but tell yourself what you wanna hear, smoke what kind of substance you want to smoke, it can't change the truth. Think it your way, well, go into space, that's where laws varied from people to people, and that's actual space, not inside spaceships.
Your place where laws can be defined on your own "opinion" doesn't exist on Earth.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@mikean1123 Nice try, kid, the 3 days after the virus being identified, China has been ban from travel. That's a major step, I recalled you morons calling that ban "racist", despite multiple countries did not ban people from China, and now are facing consequences.
South Korea, Italy.
Don't be a moron.
The virus first being identified in December of 2019, nobody knows that it is back then, so unless you're an idiot who proposed to shut down society right away, I suggest you be glad that Trump did what he did.
Want to check out Japan? Italy? Germany?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Liam No, but time is irreversible, doesn't matter whether 50 years or 2 years.
The point here is that, if your nonsense is in "most of the case", well, in "most of the case", regarding the death penalty, we got it right. So your argument fell apart again.
Your argument for not enacting the death penalty is because it might damage the person's life forever if it is a mistrial or such. My example shows that if that argument can be made, the entire prison system, or any sort of punishment that can not guarantee a perfect outcome should also be abolish.
Prison itself can be a place where people gets kill, it's a "maybe", just like the "maybe" in your death penalty argument.
Loosing your life innocently happens in every sort of activities, those are called risk. Paragliding, Scubadiving, Driving itself can be deadly, those are called risk, pal.
Deal with it, we as a society deems the risk of having undeserving punishment for severe crimes to be much dangerous than the slight possibility of making a mistake in trial.
If your argument is "because it's not perfect" then you should destroy it, that argument has been rejected centuries ago.
5
-
@Liam Wrong again, if you think that the capital punishment is unnecessary, many people think otherwise.
It's called fairness, those who commit the utmost crime is way more severe than any other crime, but faces the same sentence, that is just unfair to other criminals.
So I guess this is a different on principle.
My way of thinking is that you need a fair punishment for any crime. And of course, that is laid out in almost every civilization in the world. Those who shed blood of men, whose blood shall be shed by men.
Not just Christianity, it's in every civilization, Egypt, Persia, China, even today it's very obvious that it's a fair punishment to murderers and terrorists.
You disagree, fine, but we think that it is. And we surely have a stronger logical ground than yours.
You can not explain why it is unnecessary, why would a murderer not be killed? His victims didn't get the luxury of living a life at all.
Human from ancient times, to now have considered death to be the most severe punishment, because death or death like-status are also the most tragic accidents.
So it's only fair if the most horrendous crime be met with the most severe punishment. Life in prison is not that bad compared to death, if you're a hitman or a gang banger, who do you think runs the gangs in prison?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@teagancombest6049 That's another, lie, pal.
In the scale of FTX, the money can just be a partial share exit to get new investors.
A person who owns a significant amount of a dozens of billions dollar company should have a few hundreds of millions.
And, no, Alameda wasn't trading with customer's fund.
Alameda was a trader on the
FTX platform that uses the margin features, which is totally legal.
Don't join the conversation if you can't stop using your emotions to think legal terms, pal. That's now how it works.
Moral here is completely subjective, some say the US imperialist international politics is morally wrong, some do not.
Just talk about the law.
The guy did committed some activity that is punishable to a certain extent. But what you're doing is using your emotions to exaggerate what he did. That's not cool.
Keep it real, pal.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Metalblowing The reason Tucker posted that video isn't that the food is cheap, pal. It's more to present as if how the place is totally self sufficient and in great shape. Or at least decent shape.
And of course, certain items are cheaper than in Russia, but certain items are more expensive than in Russia. For example, gasoline, for example, bread is definitely cheaper in Russia compared to in Europe, even if you adjusted for the price and wages differences.
Now is the price in Russia comfortable for everyone? No. But is it comfortable to a significant number of people who contributes greatly to the economy, aka the middle class? Yes. It's the same in China and India as well.
They have poor people, like every other place, it's the difference between human beings. But that video shows that they're in a much better state than the US, and the Brits as well, stores are cleaners, trains are cleaners, less violent crime, and they have lower taxes, shocking.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
She yelled 4 lies in a 1 minute span.
0:05, swath are drowning,it's a plant, not human and it's due to the flood, why don't you build a better flood treatment system. Floods happen every year, somes worse then the others. 2005, 2006,2001. So what? Banning all airplanes gonna stop the flood?
0:13 towns that will never recover or come back? This is another lie, what Ocasio miss about science is that after a period of time, the flood will stop, that's how they got through Katrina, apparently she doesn't know much. And when the flood went down, if applied, her deal would destroy any chance of rebuilding, you can't rebuild farms or buy machines because those things emissions carbon. So yeah, nice hypocrisy.
01:01 The kids from Bronx don't suffer from asthma due to carbon, if she knows again, science, carbon emission went to the atmosphere, they do suffer from dirty living environment, and they will continue once most of the parents are out of work because her "deal" eliminate cars. And like how she removed jobs from New York, again, nice hypocrisy.
01:07 , wow, just 6 seconds apart, the lead water crisis in Flint, it's due to poor water treatment. Lack of money, you use lead pipes to do it, that's why there is lead. But her deal will probably bankrupt the city, therefore making the problem even worse. They can't build new pipes anymore, because she will ban steel. Now that is again, hypocrisy.
Does anybody who support her actually know anything?
Go back to school, small time troll
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@88feji Yeah, pal, so this is another piece of science, human is a bunch of cells, we're not special, just a tiny piece of everything that's going on, so by definition, the lost of any of our lives doesn't mean anything to the world, they only mean lost to a bunch of other tiny parts, therefore killing another person is justified because we're all the worthless beings. Think real clear before you claim what is right or wrong. Science is only valid to use when it doesn't concern the term we used to make ourselves special and entitled to certain rights. And that term is "life". Using science, we can create another human being as a product, and that is morally wrong. Think about that.
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Reedskiii But that compensation is never fully equal to the time they have lost, and certainly, if a person is wrongly executed, their family can also be compensated.
The fact that risk happens in everything, pal, it happens with driving, diving, flying.
Even imprisoning people have risks, and I don't know where you get the 4% number from, that is insane.
There is no data on the nonsense 4% number.
https://www.pnas.org/content/111/20/7230/tab-article-info
I suspect you get that 4% fictional number from these sites. 4% doesn't mean 4% people are executed wrongfully, it means that 4% of people being convicted to death penalty have been deferred to other means of punishment, while 1.6% are exonerated and released, they generated the extra 2.4% by lying about how if the person is no longer under death row, then it must be false conviction, this is definitely a lie.
Because even if you're no longer under death row, the factor can not be solely contributed because you didn't commit the crime, it could be due to you cutting a deal and testify in other cases.
They indicate that because they're no longer facing death row, then people wouldn't try as hard to solve their case. That is correct, but unfortunately, that is also correct to every other inmates in the system.
So your number of 4% false conviction, that is wrong. The actual number of false conviction is 1.6%, and the number of false executed people is even less, because the wrongly convicted people shall be released if their cases can be proven wrong.
Like I say, risks happens in everything, and the risk of wrongly execution here is not 4%, pal, don't lie about it.
It's much lower and the people accept that risk. If you don't accept it, go vote, other people voted against you, game over.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@eveb9459 That's the difference between Russia and Ukraine, pal.
Russia is a military super power. It gives them the right to self defense against probable threats. It's not fair, life is unfair, deal with it.
And small countries unfortunately do not have that right.
Countries with massive military capability also suffers from a greater target, that gives them the right to put their interest first beyond all other countries.
Crimea is part of Russia now, the people there voted for that. Go live there, pal, it's definitely more peaceful than Chicago.
And of course, if Ukraine dare to search military defense from nations that are hostile towards Russia, there will be no more Ukraine.
You think you can intimidate massive countries like China and Russia into not protecting their national security interest?
No chance, darling, you can't even intimidate the Taliban.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
She yelled 4 lies in a 1 minute span.
0:05, swath are drowning,it's a plant, not human and it's due to the flood, why don't you build a better flood treatment system. Floods happen every year, somes worse then the others. 2005, 2006,2001. So what? Banning all airplanes gonna stop the flood?
0:13 towns that will never recover or come back? This is another lie, what Ocasio miss about science is that after a period of time, the flood will stop, that's how they got through Katrina, apparently she doesn't know much. And when the flood went down, if applied, her deal would destroy any chance of rebuilding, you can't rebuild farms or buy machines because those things emissions carbon. So yeah, nice hypocrisy.
01:01 The kids from Bronx don't suffer from asthma due to carbon, if she knows again, science, carbon emission went to the atmosphere, they do suffer from dirty living environment, and they will continue once most of the parents are out of work because her "deal" eliminate cars. And like how she removed jobs from New York, again, nice hypocrisy.
01:07 , wow, just 6 seconds apart, the lead water crisis in Flint, it's due to poor water treatment. Lack of money, you use lead pipes to do it, that's why there is lead. But her deal will probably bankrupt the city, therefore making the problem even worse. They can't build new pipes anymore, because she will ban steel. Now that is again, hypocrisy.
Does anybody who support her actually know anything?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This is pathetically misleading. The output by the workers, is not just by the workers itself.
You work in a T-shirt factory, but you're using other people's machine and material, so pal, the value you generated is next to zero, because without the cotton or the machine, your labor generates nothing. So to say the workers generate all of the value, is mathematically false.
Your labor, without the the material bought by others, is useless, so the only reason there's an extra value, is because of the material bought beforehand by the capitalist.
The only reason that extra profits exist, is because the owner, who combined everything, bought the material, and pay the workers to do the work, that is what generates the value, not the workers.
Maybe that's why socialism is attractive to dumb people, they suck at math.
You don't generate all of the products that are being sold, a massive part of the products being sold, the price of that products, lies in the machines, the material of the capitalist that pay you.
So to say that a worker generates a 20$ T-shirt for a 5$ wage, is again, mathematically wrong.
you contribute a 5$ worth of labor, however, the other 15$ is not generated by you, it's generated by the owners who paid you that 5$ to apply your labor to the material the he owns, using the machines that he bought.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
No, nobody attack him because they're dumber than him. But I'm not, so I'm going to spell it for you.
Yang is a hypocrite, his organization only deemed 9% of it's applicants to be qualified, yet he wants to give money to 100% of the population, he waste people's money because it's not his.
Do the math, kid, Yang does fake math, he ignores variables that are real but unfortunately they debunked his policy.
VAT is paid by consumers, actually go to a country with it for once, so his plan is to raise taxes on people more than necessary, it's called stealing.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@lenaely6146 No, dummy. You call the police during the break in, as well as during the crime or slightly after.
Yeah, there's no guarantee that you'll be safe, that's why you have 2nd amendment right, before the police can come to apprehend the criminals, you have to defend yourselves.
But hey, let's do some basic math, your house is robbed, you have a few seconds to spare, stay inside your room, you call the police, they might show up in time, or you roll over and let yourself be robbed?
Do some math, dummy.
You could ask Mr George Floyd, who was a career criminal, he broke into a pregnant woman house, threatened to kill her and her unborn baby. The police got him.
How about that?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Tom Mitchell He wasn't a part of any group, he was a mad man that supported one group that isn't supported by anyone.
Antifa is the Democrats stronghold of terrorists. They ignored it for the last 12 months. They have been calling out to their members to threat senators, representatives all over the country.
Distinguish the action of one person, which is personal, and the action of an entire political party, which is organized terrorism. Go back to school, kid. Your facts are just lies.
There's no such thing as White Nationalist. National is an adjective referring to something relating to a nation. It's different from White supremacists, which is racist and all.
A nationalist is a person who put his or her country first, it's also called patriotism.
Like I said, go back to school, kid. Your logic is flawed, your facts are wrong. And you are surprisingly stupid not realizing those basic facts.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
+88feji,
No you are confused, pal. That's not how it work.
The foundation of the Declaration of Independence stated that humans are endowed by their creator with unalienable rights. The right to live, the right of liberty and the right to pursuit happiness.
By your definition that we don't consider those rights as endowed by the creator but it's negotiated between human society, you're also defying the claim that all men are created equal. If that's the basis, then because society differs everywhere, as such there was no negotiable term between the Romans and their slaves because they're in different societies, as in there was no negotiation between the white people and the black slaves.
But we did came to a consent that those people should be treated like people, not because they have power over us or that they can endanger us. Our survival instinct would be to keep them low as slaves. We gave them rights because we chose to believe that humans are special creatures and the word life gave us rights that we have to respect. Get that pal? Your logic is flawed, and there you're totally wrong.
And about that last claim, you're in a delusional bubble where you think science is the absolute base of society, it's not, kid. Science can only be deemed valid if it has the approval of the community, that's a firm base to say that any piece of science that defy the community is no longer valid as science. There are "science" defying gay people, deemed them as diseases, and need to be eliminate, those "science", got rejected, and now is said not being science, but what is the base to confirm that those science are wrong?
Let me tell you, there isn't any except the human understanding of moral. There's no such thing claiming that homosexuality is a normal variation of nature, there are a lot of things to say that it's unnatural, but we rejected those things because in our society, we gave them the right to exist as humans, not as a product of nature. So you're way over your head, go back to school, kid and learn something.
Get one thing straight kid, there are countless things that science do not know, you claim to know them but you don't , it's not absolute, there are variations, there is randomness, it's all theoretical up high, so stick to what you can define. Because if you keep claiming absolute in things that you're uncertain of, and have no proof to back it, you're no longer considered logical, you're delusional.
3
-
3
-
@Liam Like I pointed out in another reply,that number 4% is wrong to the utmost extent. They took a 1.6% exoneration rate of death row inmates and raise to 4% by assuming that inside the pool of death row inmates which were changed to life sentencing or such, there are still innocent people. This is true, but those people are no longer on death row, so the obvious rate for false conviction here is the same as any other prisoner serving a non-death row sentence. And that is a risk we have to take, unless you want to abolish prison due to the imperfection of the system.
I'd prefer no prison at all if I had committed a crime, but sorry, that's now how it works, that is why you don't commit crimes.
People who run gangs in prison lives a fairly mundane life, it's not comfortable, but it's infinitely better than their victims, their victims are usually dead.
Like I pointed out, that 4% number is a lie, the best you can get to is 1.6% of inmates being released after proven innocent, it has nothing to do with the rate of wrongfully executed prisoners, there might be some, in history, you can pointed out 8 cases. And that's out of nearly 16000 execution. So the risk here is much smaller than the false number.
And you're also ignoring the consequences of having an unfitting punishment towards a crime. If a criminal know that he can't die killing all sorts of people, in the case of desperation, why wouldn't he kill a bunch of people? He'll still live, still get to meet his family and such,in prison there are gangs, friends, maybe. All these factors has to be considered.
Whether the danger of having small rate of wrongfully executed people or the danger of having an unfitting punishment for a crime is bigger. That is up to vote, if you don't like it, vote against it. Other people voted against you, game over.
World has imperfections, people accepted this imperfection, you don't, that's your problem. You haven't made an convincing enough argument for people to accept your idea.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@sewfantastic7257 Okay, moron, maybe you're really dumb or your highly delusional. Traffic accidents happens everyday, what are you gonna do? Just because they happen, you'll remove all traffic regulation, is that your definition to solution, idiot. The Wall isn't there to stop killing, it's there to minimize the probability that some American Citizens get killed by a criminal who come to this country illegally, or maybe some American families who will be destroyed when those illegal immigrants moving drugs along their way. Use your brain, the only reason that you're alive is due to the fact that we have organizations, departments dedicated to the purpose of minimizing tragic events. They still happens, but anyone who isn't dead, should think really hard about why are you not dead. Go back to school, use your brain. Just because war still happens, doesn't mean the military is useless. Think a bit. Pathetic!
3
-
AvgJane19 I'm trying to tell you that honestly, the public schools are not doing their parts, not because they're underfunded, it's because they're mass produced and their employers are unqualified. So investing in them without rebuild the entire mechanism is meaningless, kind of like Obamacare. So we need to rebuild it in order for it to work, but those teachers protesting prevent us from doing it. Besides, it's considered immoral to lay off thousands of unqualified teachers. So the best alternative, based on my reasoning, is to utilize the private education system, which had succeeded in the past and is still succeeding. Unfortunately, the "public" teachers again with the protesting are preventing it. Don't be sad but here's the fact, most of them, if you consider "teaching" is more than just copying words from a book, then they're not qualified to do their "jobs".
3
-
3
-
@austineskola3165 Go back to school, pal, don't believe fake math. He wants to raise taxes on you. Don't believe lies, VAT is paid by consumers, not companies, go to a country which applies them, don't ignore the truth because you're lazy.
Yang is a hypocrite, his organization reject 89% of the population, said they're unqualified for higher training, but he wants to give money to everybody? Don't steal from people, pal, learn real math.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
She yelled 2 lies in a 6 seconds span
0:38 The kids from Bronx don't suffer from asthma due to carbon, if she knows again, science, carbon emission went to the atmosphere, they do suffer from dirty living environment, and they will continue once most of the parents are out of work because her "deal" eliminate cars. And like how she removed jobs from New York, again, nice hypocrisy.
0:42 wow, j, the lead water crisis in Flint, it's due to poor water treatment. Lack of money, you use lead pipes to do it, that's why there is lead. But her deal will probably bankrupt the city, therefore making the problem even worse. They can't build new pipes anymore, because she will ban steel. Now that is again, hypocrisy.
Does anybody who support her actually know anything?
3
-
@Heevoice I only mention it due to the sliding move, if you want to talk other form, happy to. Monster, that choreography, the majority of moves is in the form of crunching down the knee, therefore leg movements will be easier due to no bending upward during the dance. Every dancer drown in sweat pal, if they had drank water beforehand.
If they don't store water in their body, there would be no sweat. At least not much sweat. When you sweat a lot, it means the body temperature rises a lot, and the body will continue to sweat depends on how much water you have in you, if you don't store water, it would still be as tiring but with no sweat. So your argument is false.
I'm talking physic wise and logic wise, learn to dance, kid.
And finally, I have seen him performing in concert, I've also seen TVXQ 5 performing in concert, easily noticeable that TVXQ choreography is way harder and boy group choreograph is going downhill.
Here's another basic subject, it's called math, body move to the beat, if the beat is slower, they're moving slower, compare the beat, idiot.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@WolframaticAlpha America overplayed their dealt hands. In the 1940s and the 1980s, America was booming, and then you got all Bill Clintony and you fell into a trap of providing countless social services without thinking about what you're doing. You will continuously spend more than you ever capable of recoup, serving a gigantic number of overly privileged, unproductive people and you will burn.
You're not taking on debt a small amount at a time, whether the amount of debt is small or big depends on your capability of paying it back. In this current state, all debt is unrepayable, America is filled with a generation of losers, the wealth gap in America is widening faster than ever, not because the rich is "stealing", it's because the poor is so damn unproductive.
While the Japanese, due to their culture, they have maintained a stable population of productive people, sane people. People in Japan know that they have to work to get what the things they're using, so are the people in Norway, so are the people in Germany. Even the ones in England are more responsible than America. The debt doesn't matter, the question is how you're going to deal with that debt. Your population is incompetent. Your politicians are campaigning on the grounds of "social justices" and environmental protection make belief, because none of their "electorates" care or understand fiscal responsibilities. Society doesn't just progress onward automatically, in America, it has regressed backwards.
America Supremacy is almost over with this trend, you no longer produce breakthrough technology necessary for the world to put up with you, yeah, Amazon and Facebook are huge but those are not necessary technologies, those companies are big due to their large number of users, not because of their "proprietary tech", even the Chinese can create a worthy rival. And with the rising of countries gaining more profits through cooperation in services sector instead of warfare, it shall render the American Military useless. Blame yourself.
The difference between America and Japan is that the Japanese public can endure hardship. Americans not so much, the freedom to be anything in America had made the people choose to be stupid. It's still their choice, but they'll reap the consequences. It's very amusing actually.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@CH-zr7qr Well, that's a shock, except for how it is a lie.
Protest tend to happen in cities, but those cities belong to state with governor capable of asking for federal help.
For example, Florida, that place is crowded, but all the rioters got put behind bars, what's the difference here?
it's kind of pitiful that you try to deny this fact. You have riots, you failed to put it out, you don't ask for federal help, and then you blame how it's like that everywhere, except it only happens in places where you are in charge.
Nice lie, not gonna work.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Right, just like how those wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria are never internationally recognized.
It's over, pal.
You hope that by providing some resistance, you can hope for Russia retreat. But no, those 4 regions are officially part of the Russian Republic.
In Monday, they would be announcing formal governance system and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Taking over one village that accounts for less than 0.1% of the total population in those regions do not mean you have control.
Here's a real number. 99% of population in Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia are under Russian Protection, you've launched the counter for a month now and you've recovered zero notable cities.
It's over, pal.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's not just that Mr "Destiny", it's that Mr "Destiny" doesn't have knowledge, ciritical thinking skill or manners entirely.
Mr "Destiny" is not just regular people, Mr "Destiny" is an immatured, ignorant, inexperienced young kid.
Distinguish that, buddy. I know that with you people, a book is the scariest thing in the world, but books and maybe PhDs, it means knowledge, by the way. It's one thing to be regular people, it's another thing to be stupid people, learn to distinguish the two.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
First of all, the CNN guy didn't read the report, or he's playing dumb to brushing up Cortez's ass. Anybody who actually read and still claim to be "supporting" of it is plain lying, and it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@CezDmX Kid, let met give you a piece of knowledge about economic and security. If you double the national debt to regain what you've lost, you basically did nothing except waiting it out. There's no much more to go lower, so you go up, slowly and poorly. Ratio, kid. Learn some math.
Security, counter terrorist action can be made and will be made by the US military forces on the base in the area, doesn't require military personnel in the area to fight. You know, smart people know how to use technology, you should try it, too.
Another piece of advice, kid. If you don't know anything, don't pretend that you do. It's just pathetic.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@zip91413 No, your argument does need statistics, otherwise it would be useless because you're arguing against another statistics, so I assume that the "some leaders of Black lives matter" is your statistic. But you don't think so, okay.
You have no stats, you have assumption based on emotion, yeah, the mothers who lost their children are sad, my condolences, but the unfortunate thing is that "Black live matter" was just an abuse of of police data, aiming to ignite racial hate.
Sorry, life isn't fair, but it goes on, some die of misfire but don't mistaken it as intentional homicide from the officers, that's just despicable.
So if you don't tend to use stats, your argument crumbled. Just stick to making processing chip, man.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jackdaniels3573 Again, delusional fanboy, Tesla didn't invent AC. That was Faraday, Tesla only invented an induction motor that allows AC, because normal motors can't handle AC.
Are you stupid or a troll?
Alternating Current is not superior, the risk of death is very much there, you want to check? Why don't you put your finger into a power socket?
Idiot.
Also, there would be no radio, no AC, no wireless communication if it hadn't been for Faraday, Maxwell, kid.
So again, your stupid logic crumbles again, if the current day inventions are nothing without Tesla, the same credit of Tesla invention is due to Faraday and Maxwell, how dumb can you be?
There wouldn't be any electricity distribution if Edison hadn't pioneered in inventing electrical appliances, without the bulb, nobody would've cared for electricity,, no AC or DC that matters, so therefore, no radio, no internet, nothing.
Your pathetic logic, however it applies, shall on crumble on itself, fanboy, because it conflicts with reality.
Tesla was an important character, Edison was also an important inventor, actually Edison was much more important, because without the bulb, the electrical test ahead makes by Edison, there would be no need for electricity, therefore Tesla invention would've been useless.
That plus Edison also invented the telephone, the principle behind the recording camera, and also Alkaline batteries, which is the pioneer way of storing energy for the next 80-90 years.
So your logic fails anyway, kid, can you stop being a troll?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Bob First of all, IQ data in the US is not how it works. The test is not normalized at all, especially the language test. Because by simple math, a person speaking 2 language divide their brain into 2 section, each account for a different language, therefore the proficiency will be less than a person only knowing one kind of language well. Chinese American speaking 2 languages will have a harder time speaking English because Chinese or Mandarin is infinitely more complex, more complex language equals more work.
IQ tests are really bad inaccurate research.
Is there a difference between genetics, yes. Even within the same race, every individual is different. But they're all roughly equal if you account for the same environmental factor.
The top 1% of the smartest Caucasian has nothing over the top 1% of the smartest Asians or the top 1% of the smartest African.
Throughout the courses of history, the development frontier of science varies all around the world because each area over the globe develop at different rates. Sometimes the Egyptians were the smartest, sometimes it's the Indian, sometimes it's the Chinese, sometimes it's the British, sometimes it's the German, sometimes it's the Jewish people, sometimesit's the American. The IQ level and result afterwards based greatly on environmental factors, pal. Keep it real.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ZachDotsey Yeah, it gave power to the minority, you xenophobe. Don't be a racist.
Irony?
And the point is that, if 40 out of 50 states says one thing, despite less populated, the other 10 states can not have their ways.
The point is that, if 40 different states says one thing, that would be valued more than the rest 10 states idea despite how many people.
If an idea can convince large number of people but fail to convince majority of the states, it can not be done. For example, California would all vote for somebody who promise to cut off federal budget to give to California, but that is unacceptable to the "Union", which consists more than just California.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Kai is a professional dancer in ballet and stuff, not in pop music dancing, ballet has minimal shoulder and elbow movement, it's usually up or down but not sideways and backwards.
It also doesn't have much fast pacing knee movement, spinning isn't knee movement, during the time of the spin, the knee doesn't bend.
Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
large body movements and jumping up and immediately down.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
Spinning isn't the hard part, physic wise, the hard part is minimal body movement to show effortlessness in dance moves, that also decrease the body capability of generating strength, and that's only happen with female dance.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mile_high_topher No, you're ignoring facts, moron, those countries didn't get wealthy by providing free stuff to people who don't work, they're so wealthy that they can provide it to the people who don't work, and because their population is so low.
That's the logic, here's the evidence, Vietnam, socialist country, same well fare, people lying on the ground and on the street of public hospitals, private hospitals are an essence to the middle class. And even though it's a socialist country, people pay for the medicines and treatment at their own fair price if they don't want to die? Why? Because too many people, not enough money.
Nearer example? Canada, they provide little immigration because their well fare is too high, so they can't accept more people. Clear, try to immigrate to Canada, you'll see.
You see pal, not everybody is as dumb as you, so stop trolling and go back to school
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@englishfury1544 Now this your false logic here, you misunderstood.
The video doesn't mention any particular god, god here is understood as a higher being, beyond natural "facts".
Tons of science don't based on any natural facts but they're just theories which can explain partially the facts, science is just human understanding of something, and the question the video proposed is the absolute truth. Do you know everything to solely claim that only your theory applies here? And how do you prove your theory that there is no god?
There isn't any theory about electrons before it was discovered, doesn't mean it's not there. Belief wise, you can't disprove any of those beliefs, society wise, you don't apply it on laws because not all people feel the same despite what the truth can be.
So the main point isn't to prove what god there is, the main point is to say to people like you that if you don't know everything, don't claim that you do.
Think a bit, pal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@BigHalfSteps Uh, huh. Yeah, sure, follows that propaganda if you want.
It's impossible to control somebody's mind, pal. it is possible to expose them to certain information and influence one's decision, however, the control right remains at the users.
Users uses such platform, because their results and the information those platforms provides, are very well suited.
The users let those company influence their behavior.
Just like how you let Google organize your search results for you, or how you choose your insurance provider.
Keep it real, homie.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kuroru69 It is a lot more accurate than you think, pal.
It's definitely a lot more accurate than psychiatrist studies.
Again, there are tiers to the accuracy level.
And psychiatrist studies ranked dead last, along with other make belief science.
The first question you proposed is wrong. Because that definition is based on speculative judgement, not by measurable numbers.
"Depression is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest."
Inside that definition, there's the word "disorder" which is totally subjective because we don't know what is the correct order of mental state. Again, the brain is infinitely more complex than other organism.
And it also contains the word "persistent". You can not tell how long it is for something to be considered persistent, and it also contain the words sadness.
What categorize as sadness and what isn't.
If the definition of the thing is not even clear, no studies about it can be accurate.
A simple example of the stark contrast of accuracy is the definition of a meter in physics.
A meter is a distance traveled by the speed of light in a vacuum over a certain x time interval.
Accurate, easy to understand, easy to measure.
See the difference?
Psychiatrist study is not completely useless, but it's insanely inaccurate, that's why it's much easier to study, it's so vague that there can be 10 different answers to one case that varies based on opinions that are equally invalid, and that's a no no.
Even with theoretical physicist, that's never the case, if something is proven correct, it's admitted to be correct, however, there maybe unknowns that nobody dare to claim understanding over.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@angelinimartini I don't judge your mother, really. I just can't tolerate what she did. And that is each individual's belief in good and evil.
You happened to live in a democracy where my belief aligns with countless others that outnumber you. And we're going to vote this crime out of existence.
If a soldier give us his life, he had already sort of devalued his life. This is a well known point in Economics Game Theory. If a soldier made a reasonable and careful consideration weighing the pro and cons of going to the front lines. No sane soldier would ever go to the front line. And act of heroism aka sacrificing in a way is equivalent an act of stupidity. If you want to devalue your life, it's your choice. But you have no standing in forcing that on to countless others.
Your acknowledgement is considered barbaric by countless others, and that's unfortunate. Enslaving people can be a wonderful way to move society forwards, imagine the free labor, free testing experiments, free organ donors. Biomedical technology will leap for decades if you do testing without concerns for human life. But is is a "barbaric" practice. And like I said, we don't tolerate that.
Ask yourself, pal, if you justify killing a kid just because they can be put in undesirable circumstances. What is this criteria? How low must a household get before it is acceptable for them to kill their child? If your logic stands?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hyacinthhyacinth5443 EXO for clear skin good eyesight and lovelife BTS dancing is hip hop?
Yeah, nice try, pal.
What are they gonna say when a bunch of cyber terrorist goes after them? Exo sucks? The truth is like poetry, people hate poetry.
Girl group dance is very hard, the tempo of the song itself is much faster, movements require elegance.
Don't be a delusional fans.
The difficulties of male group dancing went downhill really quickly. Power and fluidity?
Yeah nice try, hand movement requires less force, back in the days, they do arm and body movements.
Math, difficult, right?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@HurricaneGaming509 If you can't get both UBI and Healthcare, then what's the point of giving UBI?
You remove people's benefits so the people will have to replace it if they don't want to die, and most of them will not use the money to replace it. They rather have a drink then saving up to go the doctor.
It's a zero sum game if you remove people's social program to give them the money that was going to the social program.
It's immoral because when the people waste that money, you'll have no choice but to leave them to die because you don't have any money left on well fare.
Where's your math for that generating more? You give the people's UBI only pay for the extra cost on products that are going to the VAT. zero sum game, study.
If you're claiming that people will earn more than what they pay then your sum would be in the negative because you don't generate more money in the VAT but you're giving more what you get. Study.
And again, marijuana decriminalize, and opioids? You'r giving people money and the same time allow them to use drugs that cost money and bring them harm?
Wow, that is just basic math of stupidity. Go back to school, if you generate new source of income by giving people harmful products to buy, they will use the money on those products and not on themselves. Did you think before you type that? And opioids being legal? What's next, crystal meth, next we should decriminalize cocaine, right, because of what? People responsibility to themselves?
Pal, go back to school, you're way over your head.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@darrencommanda7736 You're just an adorable guy. Reeves in a million year will never get the support Snyder did with his Snydercut.
The batman getting a trilogy is just another bad investment decision by Warner Brothers, Reeves had no vision, no story. The Batman is basically a mystery movie that loses it's appeal the moment the story is revealed. It will soon hit a box office slump, because after seeing it once, you don't really want to see it again.
It doesn't get multiple spinoff shows, Warner Brothers plan for that spinoff shows way before the release of the movie, it needs content to pad for HBO Max, and because it's Warner Brothers, they're churning out shows that nobody really care for.
Even Wonder Woman got a sequel, you know how that ended, poorly.
If you want to compare the quality of Reeves movie to a trilogy, compare it to Batman Begins, you can see Reeves version lack in every meaningful notable aspects.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That doesn't really apply here, hombre. Because of 2 things. First, there's no liveable mountainous environment in Ukraine for guerilla warfare. It's too cold and it's too brutal of an environment for that. There's also no road of transport, unlike in the Vietnam war, there was mountainous roads that are hidden by the forest and all.
The Ukrainian forces doesn't have any support of the people in the front region. Because the front right now is the territory of ethnic Russians.
"Ukraine" as country isn't even a historically real country, it's territory now is a mix of groups of people that had never considered themselves the same people. The border makes no sense, such border was made up out of thin air. The Western part is pro-"Ukraine", whatever that name means to them and the East is pro-Russia. Unlike in Vietnam where it's very clear that the entire territory of Vietnam is one group of people sharing the same tradition for hundreds of years.
You can't apply one military tactics to all scenario, you have to adapt.
In this case, reality doesn't allow Ukraine to adapt, there's no strategy where they survive, they are finished. The climate is cold and brutal, and they don't have any hiding spot.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
How old are you, kid? Finish school first before typing nonsensical stuff online.
If you're those BTS 7th grader philosophical morons, I suggest going back to class.
Here, a little bit of history and math, learn it.
People who used drugs, built a lot of things that you're using. WW2 soldiers, WW1 soldiers, Steve Jobs, The Beatles, Michael Jackson, Queen, Spice Girls,.....
Prostitution is about 1% of Korea GDP, which means it's the source of income, way to live for hundreds of thousands. If you add everything related to entertainment, which is K-Pop and more, that would be the size of the prostitution industry.
The public is just bashing people to feel good about themselves, I suggest you learn something morally correct, how about not being a hypocrite?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@БогданБеркут Unless your're totally ignorant. In 1897, the entirety of Eastern region of Ukraine today is a part of the Russian Empire, therefore, they're Russians and has been since 1686, which is over 200 years.
You can not make up an ethnicity out of thin air, buddy. Whatever you called "Ukraine", there's no such thing, ever, never a kingdom called Ukrainians, never there was a people called Ukrainian in history. There are Hungarians, there are Polish, but there is no such thing as Ukrainian. Texans are Americans, there isn't an ethnicity called Texans.
And that is still true on the territory of Donbass.
Why don't you go study history. Here's a clue, you can't make up a people.
2
-
@БогданБеркут To simplify it for you, here's where you got wrong.
1. There was never a group of people called "Ukrainians" or whatever words that were totally separate from the Russians. Literally never.
2. "Eastern Ukrainians", "Russian", "Belarussian" all started from the people of Kievan Rus, which is the ancestor of of the Russian people today, or at least the most powerful branch of that state becomes Tsardom of Russia then Russian Empire. So again, it makes no sense to claim that there's such a thing as "Ukrainian", because they don't have a separate distinctive origin or culture.
Like how Texans are different from New Yorkers but they are all Americans.
3. The mentioning of a word in some documents literally means nothing if there's no gigantic substantial change to the people living there, their governance, their culture, etc. Now there can be a group of very vocal separatist living at what's called Eastern Ukraine today back in the 19th, 18th, maybe even 15th century. But those are small individuals and doesn't represent one bit the status of the population there back then.
4. And furthermore, what you seemed to ignore is the artificial nature of what you called "Ukraine" today, because we traced back in history, that region of territory was again, never wholed or ruled by just one group of people. Because the Eastern is part of the Russian Empire, but the Western part was part of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth and some was part of the Austria Hungary Empire.
So they can't be one group of people if throughout history, their territory was never whole. It makes no sense, homie.
You can't make a group of people out of thin air, homie. The Russian Empire Census doesn't list them as Ukrainians in a separate manner, like the way they listed Hungarians or Polish. But what's called "Ukranian" is called "Little Russians", it literally proves that they're not 2 distinctive group of people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hippo780 Oh, I've read all the comments, people didn't realize what they were arguing for is total baseless.
Marconi invented the radio, he might have used Tesla innovation or ideas but Tesla didn't put those innovations together to make the radio capable of being used in society. James Maxwell proved the existence of radio wave, and if it wasn't for Maxwell and bunch of other people, Tesla wouldn't have been able to come up with anything.
Credit is where credit is due, pal, you can grow the grain, but it doesn't make the grain bread.
Tesla contributed greatly to the foundation of those inventions, but certain people also contributed massively to the birth of a specific products.
Tesla invented and thought of new stuff based on the principles founded by others, others did the same with Tesla material.
Improving the practicality of a product makes it a some sort of a new contribution.
Society is an imperfect place where the boundaries between innovation and copying can be so vague, so we act based on the principles of whoever claim first, wins.
Don't rob people from their achievement. Tesla contributed much to America, so did countless others.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@davidthomas9165
Omar is the youngest of a family of 7. Only 3 children made it to the United States. What happened to the other 4?
Usually they're categorized as "missing" but who knows what goes on in Somalia.
Before the went to the United States, they spent 4 to 5 years at Somalian Refugee Camps, things get messy, people get smuggled, intentionally or unintentionally.
It's pure logic to see that if this is a lie, then a simple 20$ test can debunk it and embarrass every single candidates or politicians who have used it against Omar. Brilliant political move. But Omar is afraid to do so. Just like when Elizabeth Warren took that heritage DNA test.
So how dumb are you thinking that this is a legal normal marriage. Not to mention how both Hirsi, Elmi and Omar all lived under the same roof when Elmi came to America? Ex faith husband and legal husband living under the same house with the kids. That's a little too "liberal", even for a Democrats.
We have that proof through a business license that Hirsi tried to apply for.
So how dumb are you?
If a person has every tool to prove their innocence, and they're being falsely accused of something. What would be the correct response?
Either case, if it's true that Omar married her brother, then she's a criminal. And if Omar didn't marry her brother, she's called an idiot for not debunk this entire thing with a 20$ test.
Either way, you're supporting a loser.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joseph7988 Nope, buddy, that's not how it works. Technology has advanced throughout the globe at countless places, and countless places have contributed to the growth of technology.
The contribution was from China, India, Europe, Arabian World, Greeks, all of them combined led to modern technology. For example, the Arabic numeral, which without it, would have math arithmetic infinitely more difficult, or the Indian mathematicians contribution to the creation of the number 0 and trigonometry, gun powder from China, etc.
Buddy, your intellect is just not up to par here, go study some math.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jacobodom8401 Yeah, that's a total lie, pal. Sure, most women won't. But the girl is not most women at all. The girl here is supposedly an angel sent to save the guy.
Now of course you may say that it's not representative of most women, and you're correct. Most women are mediocre, they're poor, they're unkind. Most people are mediocre, poor, unkind, harsh and cruel. That's the point.
There's nothing mediocre about these stories, they're special examples, they're inspiring stories. Like the story of success or the story of heroism.
They're not representative of most people, but they're the representation of what people can be.
Don't know what kind of women you're surrounding yourself with, but find a better bunch, pal. That's the point of the movie.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@FutureChaosTV Okay, kid. Learn to distinguish the action of one lunatic and the action of the entire political party. The entire "Democrats" is supporting this terrorist group, and if you think that this isn't terrorizing, give me your contact, you'll see how it can be done without any weapons, or physical action. Breaking somebody's mind is much harder, but much more dangerous than physical harm. Want to try, kid?
Terrorism is inflicting terror on somebody to achieve something, that's the definition of it. Not your delusional thinking that you need a gun to be a terrorist. Go back to school, read a book because you're just embarrassing yourself.
And that's not even considering how Antifa also inflicted physical violence to the people, aka Portland.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@krystalphan8871 So you have nothing, no argument, no facts, no stats, no logic. You have my pity, kid. Ít học không nên nói bậy, nếu không biết gì mà cứ cố nói là thảm đấy nhóc, quay lại trường đi. Biết nói biết, không biết nói không biết, vậy mới là biết, đừng nên giả vờ biết, nhục lắm.
2
-
2
-
@deathstroke8639 You need to read the previous replies, pal. Like I said, the unborn is also a human, and the concept of human rights, were written down as endowment by our creator. The concept of human rights, is only applicable if we consider ourselves as humans, a special creatures among the living creatures, not if we just consider ourselves a bunch of cells. Than we're no different than animals what we kill, a mature pig has more cells than a newborn baby, we kill the pigs but we DO NOT KILL BABIES. It's an abstract definition, think harder. Why? Because the concept of living and the right to live or any human rights started from an abstract idea.
For your question, what if the woman hadn't been rape? And if that's your case for killing an unborn baby, why don't kill off actual babies conceived by rape?
If the mother could die and need an abortion, that would in the hands of the doctors, as in how it's the doctor's right to focus on a patient which has a higher survival rate. And in really special situation, abortion could be a heartbreaking required option, and that would be the inevitable, but 0.1% of the case don't represent the other 99.9%.
Clear? If you have any question, leave another reply.
2
-
@Liam Multiple people will say that they won't commit crime so that they won't be facing any punishment.
The death penalty is essential, pal, according to people who vote for it, it is essential. The determination whether something is essential or not is from a personal standpoint, and they put it to a vote.
There are still innocent people being jailed but that's the imperfections here. There are innocent people dying due to driving, people have accepted that.
The underlying facts here are not facts. Those are your assumptions.
Whether something is "essential" is your assumption. Because it's essential to what? People say that it's essential to maintain a low crime rate on certain behavior. In Asian countries, the death penalty is applied widely to drug dealings, and of course, they stop the drug dealings there.
Sure there are drugs, but people were way too afraid to commit the crime. It doesn't completely stop it but it reduces it much more than in America.
So whether the death penalty is essential is due to the measurements of each individuals.
You are thinking with emotions, not facts.
Driving kills innocent people, prison jails innocent people. Electricity itself can kill people. Like I pointed out, it is a risk.
Your entire argument relies on your opinion of the death penalty not being essential. You based this assumption on what? Essential to what? Certain people say that it is essential to maintain order and reduce crime.
Death penalty is a punishment, pretty much like prison itself, but on a much severe level. How do you distinguish prison and death penalty? To certain people, people who have been raped in prison, death might be the better solution than life sentence. It's all subjective when it comes to adjective of the matter, pal.
And to determine whether a certain standard be applied, people vote.
You say it's not essential, other people say it's essential. And other people vote for it, you voted against them.
They win, you loose, that's life.
Let's admit the fact that you have no basis to say that the death penalty is non essential. Because it's only non essential to you.
To Asian countries, it's very essential. Who are you to say that they're wrong?
They say that abortion is a disgusting act, who are they to say that the US is wrong.
There are subjective facts, and there are your opinion.
Whether something is essential or not is opinion based.
To you, food security might be essential, but to a Budhist, only minimum to survive food is enough, they prefer quiet time of enlightenment than food security. Who are you to say that they're wrong?
Get down from your high horse and get back to reality pal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Liam It's your opinion that people rejected. Sorry. If people voted for the death penalty, which means to them, the death penalty is essential, then it means the basis of your "anti death penalty", which is how the death penalty is not essential, that basis of yours have been rejected.
You can only make argument based on the pre-accepted grounds, pal.
You need to base your death penalty argument on certain pre-agreed upon basis. Such as the right to something, the unalienable rights to life, liberty or pursuit of happiness. If the death penalty conflict with those certain agreed upon value, then you have a case. Such as the case for abolishing slavery, it's easy due to the "all men are created equal" philosophy.
You need a contradiction to convince people that they're conflicting.
The argument based on how you "feel" that the death penalty is non-essential is not a convincing one. Just saying.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, I propose the "Ukrainians" to give up. Go study some actual history, hombre. this "Ukraine" country with it's regconized territory is a made up country with no history at all consisting of such borders.
The Eastern part for the last 1000 years, like 70% of the time, were Russians, and the Western part belonged to the Polish and the Lithuanian Commonwealth.
There's no such thing as "Ukraine" in history, it was made up out of thin air by Lenin. The last 30 years are incredibly insignificant in a thousand year of history, go learn some math, hombre.
To the people in the East and the South, Russia is their country, to the people in the West, it's a mess, some consider themselves Hungarians, somes considered them Polish, some considered themselves "Ukrainian", whatever that means.
But one thing for sure, where the front is happening, none of it is of "Ukraine".
The solution is for these "Ukrainians", whatever that means to surrender unconditionally before they get totally destroyed. They're using reserves troop to barely breaking through the first line of defense. Go learn some math and you'll see how sad that is.
Learn some math, buddy. They need to surrender now before dying under America order.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nope, he answered it. You didn't understand it, but he answered it.
Anybody who trade derivatives on FTX gets to loan other user's fund to trade as long as they put up collateral. This is legal, it's in the terms of service.
Alameda put up their collateral using FTT tokens, and of course, when Alameda faisl, FTX supposed to use the collateral to pay off Alameda loans, but in this case, they can't.
Because FTT tokens also fail when Alameda fails.
So in short, Sam version is completely legal, it's risky, but it's legal. He didn't steal anybody's money. Terms of service allows FTX to use user's fund to loan out to other traders on FTX platform as long as they put up collateral. And it includes the risk of somebody putting really risky collateral.
2
-
2
-
@Andrew-it7fb Stimulus bill in March 2021? Kid, nobody on the Republican side was in favor of that. A much smaller version of it, maybe. But not that monstrosity.
Every products need a supply chain. So does the US Government doesn't have control over policies regarding their own domestic supply chain?
No tax breaks for the suppliers? No policies regarding reopening? Anything? Or is it, the economy doesn't depend on anything the Government does?
Get real, kid.
Food prices started going up last year, that's reasonable, why is it still going up this year. Ever question that?
Trump didn't mishandle Covid, in case you hadn't noticed, each states have their own regulation regarding to Covid patients, that's why in New York, pervert Cuomo killed like 10000 seniors patients? Trump and all of the governors all mishandled Covid. The ones handled Covid correctly in 2020 is China and Vietnam, and there's only one way to that. Intruding on freedom.
It's only because of Trump that there are vaccines within a year, that is a miracle caused by expedited process, said by everybody.
So pal, you don't want people to starve, you give them food. If you give them free money, you devalue the money, because they can use that money to do all sort of things, affecting all sorts of aspects. Learn some math.
Improve supply chain with infrastructure bill.
That's your reasoning? Improving roads , bridges and waterways are improving the supply chain?
Do you understand basic English or you're just spewing out everything you read from the title hoping to razzle dazzle idiots?
Not going to work in real life, kid.
Improving infrastructure is called a routine schedule, it creates temporal jobs that goes away immediately after you done improving the infrastructure.
It doesn't solve anything, it's called short term drugs.
You dummies would love it but it's because you're stupid.
That infrastructure is not going to lower the price of groceries or gas, or anything in particular.
It will improve the roads that you don't have to travel on because you can't afford the gas, or a meal outside because of rising prices.
So yeah, Biden did nothing substantial. There's no policy to help the "supply chain", no tax exemption for necessary products, no improving negotiations with gas and energy company.
And don't forget, last month he just funded terrorist with top of the line military equipment.
Go back to school, children, this must be blowing your mind.
Covid is over, pal. Restrictions have been lifted, yet, for half a year, Monsieur Biden gives people more money to work than not work. What could've gone wrong during those months?
Economic impacts don't happen instantaneously, genius. Everything that happens today is due to the polices made over the last year, a long enough timespan for the policies to have an impact. Inflation of now is impacted by this "relief" bill that Biden signed. He doesn't have a clue what the hell he did.
More people get paid for doing nothing while not much is going wrong, companies start to feel as if they're product is undervalued, they raise the prices in response. Human sympathy has it's limits, one year is enough, dummy Biden extended for another year, and now when the relief bill stops, the companies will wait for about another half a year to lower the prices, or they won't lower the prices and consumers can go to hell.
All thanks to Biden. He's in charge, if Trump is in charge, he would blamed for the inflation, like Trump was blamed for Covid in the early days. But at least Trump made an achievement in the vaccine?
What is Biden's achievement except an infrastructure bill that has to happen every 10 years?
Abandoning Afghanistan allies?
2
-
@Andrew-it7fb Really? No idea of what I'm talking about.
Tell me, where is this massive study of the economic status in this country, including details of all the impactful events of the past years that deliver a reasonably precise results?
Or everything you have is a sad claim or "conclusion" that nobody can prove or verify in anyways?
Of course states that ended the unemployment payments still have issues, they just ended last September and now it's the consequences for extending it to September in March.
The lack of clarity of why is the stimulus given and the purpose of it is to help people in need, not for people in need to abuse it must have played some part in it.
Here's a clue, kid, food and products that you buy now were made months ago, the policies you made then affect the prices right now.
So you need to stop that "extension" in March, so that the affects it has on the economy is understandable, that it's actually caused by Covid. You've prolonged the time, and now you're ruined, at least for the rest of the year. It's a spiral you can't escape. Give people money, they don't work, they don't work, price rises, you need to keep giving people money. That's why you economists are idiots.
Lack of logical thinking or self improving. You lie, make mistakes and get away with it.
Like the example above, you give somebody morphine after the surgery, that's fine. You continue to give them morphine after they're healthy, even if only for a few months and then you stop, shockingly they have already became addicts.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Temmie No, pal, I pointed out why he is troll, therefore my conclusion is that he is a troll, it's called reasoning and conclusion, you're the one who is lost, Clear? Don't be desperate, think for yourself instead of typing nonsense propaganda, need a definition for that, too? It means you're typing lies to advocate for something, propaganda. Clear?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
SM is the company with the most lawsuits in Korean entertainment history.
Also the company with the highest suicide rate.
Keep it real, pal.
H.O..T, JYJ, Hangeng, Jessica, Kris, Luhan, Tao, Jonghyun, Sulli,etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Because this guy is lying.
You think these technologies are something magical, that nobody can ever re-create, pal?
No, they can be re-create, if the atomic bomb can be researched independently, so can this.
The point is that it will cost more than just to buy it. But once there's a war, that cost becomes irrelevant.
Russia will survive this pretty easily, they've been stockpiling parts since 2014 to prepare for war.
It will take a few years for these stockpile to dry out and after the war, maybe in another month or two, if the West don't remove it's ridiculous sanctions, then Russia will build their own system, it will be costly, but they don't really care because they're sanctioned anyway.
The old world order where America dictates everything is over, considering the inflation level and consumer prices, America is in worse shape than Russia.
How much you're paying for gasoline? And because the increase in gasoline prices, there goes everything else.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@francescocuoreazzurro2443
Are you also aware that such violation is done countless times before by the United States, Great Britain, Poland, China, almost every capable military country in the world?
Why are criticizing Russia for doing something every country does?
Russia doesn't agree with that version of international border anymore, same way US didn't agree in Afghanistan, Iraq, Serbia, Lybia, Syria.
Keep it real, homie. Ignoring border by annexing land or invade to install a new government is the same level of disregarding.
2
-
Buddy, are you insane? This current China is the ancient China geographic boundaries. Because China has a much much longer history than whatever your country is, maybe except for Egypt, but because of that long history, their territories change, however it always changes around a central area, and most of the time, it's not that they invaded other people. It's that other dynasty invaded them and then assimilated certain territories into the current China. For example, Inner Mongolia is given as part of China when the Mongols invaded and established the Yuan Dynasty. The current place of Xinjiang is given when the Manchus invaded and established the Qing Dynasty.
China was invaded and then those invaders got turned into Chinese, and then the invader's territory got absorbed into China.
It sounds weird to a crude mind like you but that's actual history, you see. Go study some, you'll understand.
2
-
2
-
@rin4641 Well, it's either that or stop working.
Pal, you're seemingly living in a delusional world where everybody is equal, no, everybody is not equal.
Some works harder, smarter, have more money, therefore they are the "rich".
The poor works for them voluntarily, pal, they don't force the poor to work. The poor is welcomed to quit and starved to death.
Minimum wage meaning you're providing minimum labor, if you think that the wage is not fair, you can quit, and if nobody ever pays you a "fair" wage you think of, it's because nobody values your labour that much and therefore you don't worth that much wage.
Grow up, you'll see.
2
-
@lisayhan1 That's sad, what happens to you, little child? You major in sjws degrees and now you're unemployed and want to blame other people instead of working?
You're despicable.
If you're stupid, make stupid choices, provide cheap labour such as that entire family in the movie, YOU ARE WORTHLESS.
Nobody's taking advantage of them, they're just worthless, who is going to pay them more for the same labor? Fairy god mother?
You want to give away to charity, do it with your own money. Don't enslave other people, you hypocrite.
Reality is just so harsh, the morons without anything due to their incompetent and stupidity always lecture people on how they "deserve" free stuff from the people who work harder, smarter than themselves.
Hypocrisy much?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@only1kyng463 The KKK was gone in the 1980s, so you can't keep resorting to that weak reason, dummy.
You can't resist arrest, it's a crime. Whatever your reason is, it's a unjustified reason.
You don't want to follow the law because you think the law is against you, fine. But if you don't follow the law then the people enforcing the law shall use force on you.
And also KKK was a Democrats organization, Robert Byrd, mentor of Bill Clinton, known Klansman.
And of course, them operating in the South during the 60s, where they're all Democrats.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DogshitArgument We don't recognize or engage into conversations with unqualified people. Like how you don't let a kid who's not a doctor operate on your liver.
Buddy, have you no standards?
There's nothing substantive about Burnelli argument, it's not even an argument, he can't even distinguish what is fact and what is not fact.
Here's a clue, an example for you. 15 out of 17 judges on the ICJ ruled for plausibility of genocide, that's a fact.
Plausibility is an extremely low standard, that's an opinion, and furthermore, it's unspported, ignorant opinion because that guy never even heard of that word in any case.
Morris, Rabbini and Finkelstein had no problems discussing all of the issues because they all know about it, and most of the time, these 3 agrees on the facts, they just don't agree on the underlying explanation.
Burnelli doesn't even know the facts.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@biswaroopmaiti2943 South China Sea is not a territory with people living there, it's an area of water, and honestly, the ownership of that area of water can not be based on historical precedence, if there were lots of people living there, the story would be different.
Regarding your argument about "same people", you're totally false.
Korean Peninsula is one people, they're one people divided, not 2 set of people, everybody there knows this. Their goal is reuinification, it's just that they can't right now.
You'll need better details for the Central Asia.
Israel and Palestine is the same, they are one set of people living on that piece of land, peacefully, one piece of land having multiple religion co-existing. It's the outside interference of Western Superpowers, originally British and then America that messed up the entire place.
I never said that being the same people stop conflict, because countless factors contribute, but it is an unequivocal right for them to be reunified. Honestly most of the things you said are messed up not because of the people there, but by foreign interferences, from British colonization to Cold War between superpowers. So again, if you just stop interfering, they'll move towards the same objective.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jasonswitzer1748 It's elementary, darling. Those 4 regions are the ones with heavily Russian origin population, and they are the coastline of Ukraine, which if it's in Russia posession shall eliminate all kind of massive weapon transportation to Ukraine, it's another security measure.
Russia does not view those Russian speaking Ukrainian as Ukrainian, darling. Russia view them as Russian, living in rightfully Russian territory but was mistakenly given to this country Ukraine at the fall of the Soviet Union.
When the Soviet Union was formed and when it falls, over 280 million people has lived in it from 1922 to 1991, nearly 70 years. Investments are made, rellocations are done, all those people treated the USSR as their home, the dissolution of the USSR failed to take care of such problems because they were too occupied economically, and that is a mistake.
People who live in this in this country Ukraine, especially in those 4 regions, that is their land, their home, and they don't want to be Ukrainian, they speak Russia, they have Russian culture, their grandparents, their father, their mothers were Russian.
Russia view it as a mistake of history that those 4 regions were given away to a counntry who's currently trying to opress their Russian origin.
Your mistake is thinking that those 4 region are of Ukraine because it's drawn on a map. Russia disagree with you and they are going to take it back, they already have.
The US did some serious bad stuff, and they benefited greatly from it, it might have lost their status on the world stage but that's very trivial to the physical benefits it gained the US. And China, India, Russia are sick of it. We do not live in a world where the US are the supreme leader, other countries want to have their say and act in their own interest as well. It's quite elementary. What the US did isn't considered good or bad by Russia, China and India, darling. It's only considered acting upon US interest, and now Russia is acting on Russia interest.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
Spinning isn't the hard part, physic wise, the hard part is minimal body movement to show effortlessness in dance moves, that also decrease the body capability of generating strength, and that's only happen with female dance.
SNSD didn't dance harder than this, Gee was quite easy, I got a boy was fairly easy, Hoot is easier, and Lion Heart is just tremendously easy. The hardest they ever dance is Oh!, and it's because they have to stay still while posing, not because of fast movement.
After school, maybe.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Checkmate Chess Channel That would be a bad solution.
Because when it crashes, people suffer.
Innocent people who did nothing yet face the consequences of the previous generations.
You could keep it at a low balance and slowly fixing it.
In the long run, we're all dead.
Keynesian economics is wrong when it says that government intervention is the solution, but it's not wrong when saying that government interventions are needed sometimes.
For example, if the entire food industry of America got hammered by China somehow and food production is stop.
People will starve without government intervention.
Certain things are necessary when it comes to human lives and basic needs.
Bad programs have been made, but rushing out of those bad programs ignoring the consequences of it is stupid.
The same happened in Iraq, when we go in, it was wrong, but when Obama De moron pulled us out, it's even worse, because it created a consequences that damages the region.
You can't fix the past, there are consequences to immediate actions, think about those consequences.
Immediately getting off heroin can kill you, withdrawal symptoms varies, it can kill you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Konstantin Kissin and the delusional bunch.
Mr Kissin who never actually grew up or experienced adulthood in any central part of the Soviet Union or Russia whatsoever, as well as never studied the country, it's history, it's current societal situation deeply at all, pretend as if he is an expert on the matter of the country because he has an accent and a Russian ancestry. He never underwent any kind of proper education, and by what he said, it's very clear that he hasn't even done any proper research.
He lacks the knowledge of the history of the region, as well as knowledge of international law, especially it's underlying principles, he also lack the knowledge of the actions committed by the West to totally violated those principles. These facts are easily found by listening to people who has first hand experience and frankly way more qualified than him, for example Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheinmer.
Mr Kissin has this delusional sense of logic, claiming that because he has a distant family living in "Eastern Ukraine", then it automatically means his family experience in a small city or town is equivalent of the entire picture of a gigantic region the size of England. Including regions which are at war, a fact that is recognized by countless experts and in fact, countries. Specifically France and Germany when they insure the Minsk and Minsk 2 agreement, if there wasn't a war, why was there an agreement?
Mr Kissin's severe lack of understanding or the apperance of it either stem from the intentional lying that he is forced to make in order to get a quick buck promoting his channel towards an equally delusional audience, or from his gigantic delusional attitude, granting himself expert on stuff he know very little about, taking his own words as proof even though, again, he knows very little about what he's talking about. He lied to himself and then he bought his own lies as if they're the truth, a delusional and dangerous mindset that is shared by an overwhelming majority of his audience. Radicals that don't listen to reasons.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Because it's not the truth, that dance is definitely tiring, every time you jump, you're lifting your entire bodyweight, and when you flex, you're also moving your entire bodyweight. Walking however, don't, so compare to boygroup dance like EXO, it's just a level above, EXO and BTS don't actually dance, they make it look like they're dancing but it's actually moving to look like dancing, big movements requires real stamina, like TVXQ and 2PM used to do.
Don't be an idiot.
2
-
2
-
@taira7007 You pick a song which there is only 2 members, very low tempo, and never considered a signature choreograph, at least pick a correct example.
I have no idea where you think modern choreography is more demanding, here's where you're very wrong for really obvious reason, mainstream music, EDM incorporated into songs usually resulted in rap sections, and those sections alon are usually account 1/3 of the song, and for those 1/3, most barely move, that includes the beat transition where the music suddenly slow down and they pretend that they're moving to the slowing beat, but it's actually not moving.
The really hard one, maybe try TVXQ purple line, or O Jung.Ban.Hap, even Mirotic is harder than most modern choreography, here's a tip from physics, when you stretch your entire arm and swing it instead of just moving the elbow really fast, you're using much more energy.
2
-
2
-
Look, the books, that specific book in that chapter is wrong, because they failed to acknowledge in the contaminated pool of applicants.
If you lock a genius up in the mountains, no education, no exposure, he or she will score insanely low on those IQ tests.
You have certain degree of education, it is equivalent to a certain minimum score. You re-examine the data today and the Chinese will crush the US pool of applicants. Not because the Chinese are inherently better at anything, but because they went through a far rigorous educational system.
There is always difference among groups of people, but that's overwhelmingly due to differences in environmental factor.
The top 1% of the smartest Caucasian, Asian, African are roughly equally smart with negligble differences.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vladyslavakram There is no such thing as Ukraine, that is the point.
What is called "Ukraine" is an artificial state created by Lenin and eventually Stalin. Those guys are not heroes of the people by any mean, they did some bad stuff.
In 1991, that partition of the Soviet Union was done based on the horrible actions that went before and that's exactly why it has to be fixed.
Your Kievan Rus argument will fall apart, because it's undisputable that Kievan Rus is the origin of the Russian Empire, the same royal family line ruled both of them and the successor to Kievan Rus chose their new central of power at Moscow, meaning you just admitted that the rightful ruler of Kievan Rus territory, which includes the Eastern Part of Ukraine, just the East, the Western part belongs to Poland or Hungary.
The rightful ruler of Eastern Ukraine is based out of Moscow.
Sorry, homie, you're trippin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The law requires that you follow the police's reasonable command, the guy didn't and face the consequences. If the officers sense potential threat, for example, a guy breaking into somebody's house and refuse to stand down, plus the fact that he put his hand into his pocket, that's why he got shot, if the guy was white, he would still have gotten shot. Shoot him in the arm, shoot him in the leg, yeah, right like in a second sensing something dangerous in the dark the officers could have aimed like John Wick, think a little bit.
2
-
Nope, there are very big reasons to do so, because unlike YouTube, which is a free platform, a scientific venue is a publisher.
Your work is reviewed and then judged by a board of editor. And those disappointing quality of those articles reflect the competency of board of editor.
Even the most esteemed ones of any business, there are full of holes inside of them. Massive holes, and people just follow the game because that's the game.
Try doing real science, you'll see. Most of those articles are extremely useless.
One can post their methodology and work online for everybody to see, but once you've submitted yourself for review, you've put yourself into the situation where as if you're begging for the board approval.
The board can very much be wrong, they're humans and humans make mistakes, and those journals always make a lot of mistakes.
Once you've started doing it, you'll understand. If you don't understand that designed vagueness in the industry, you're not doing it properly.
Real science stands whether it is published by a magazine, a tabloid, a journal or even on a website.
Show some respect.
The scientific industry works like this, a researcher send a paper to journal where his contacts are editors, and then such journal is ranked by another one of his contacts. It's a gigantic circle of corruption. It's like investment banking but with more complicated issues and a higher proclaimed ethical stance.
Now within such circle of corruption, sometimes a miracle can occur. However, there are also sometimes notable results, not yet to the levels of miracles are ignored.
Once you've published inside an article, you can't post it for free.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@josephhoward4697 Yeah, both you and your friends made serious mistakes, pal.
Because your friend cash out before they gain back their money.
If they're buying the dip, then if it crashes more, then they have to wait longer until it bounce back up, eventually it will bounce back up.
If they listen to Mr Market and sell just because everybody else is selling and price is going down then they have no idea what they're doing.
And neither did you know what you're doing. There's absolutely no reason for the stock to rise in the last 2 years. You got lucky, pal. You bought the bubble while it is expanding and seemingly cash out before it pops. That's not skill, that's pure luck.
Because you still have no idea why it went up or why it went down.
You just gambled and got lucky.
Sane People time the bottom not to win immediately, that's where your friends did wrong. You time the bottom to maximize profits in the long run. Had your friends hold it until it recovers, they would have made serious profits.
As long as they choose solid stocks, they don't need to "cut loses" because those companies will last far beyond into the future.
So that's where you and your friends go wrong. Both you and your friends have no idea what you're doing.
You bought on the way up, it's called FOMO, you got lucky it didn't pop in your face. Enjoy the money because if you keep doing that, you won't make any more of it. Your friends cut loses quickly because they listen to the market and follows the crowd.
Different outcome doesn't mean one side was correct and the other side was wrong. If two people both gambled, even if one person won and the other person lost, both of them are idiots.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AR-ym4zh Remove all fossil fuels in the next 12 years?
How are you gonna do that? Oil make car fuels, airplane fuels, plastic, chemicals, asphalt, synthetic materials, and energy!
You're gonna invent an electricity airplanes, which will require tons of battery, which again, require oil to made the compound? Why don't you learn actual science, pal?
They're gonna remove private transportation, so no cars, you're gonna steal everybody's vehicle? Or you're gonna buy them, which again, cost money that you don't have. So the only choice you have is to ban cars.
And the worst part
Green New Deal, providing money to all people, don't you think before you type?
2
-
@AR-ym4zh No, The Green New Deal is not easy, it's also not the bare minimum. It's a very stupid thing to do and very radical. Radical is not a good word, learn it.
Now you are falling for propaganda here, give me a source citing this dead planet if we don't give in to the crazy plan? Where any source? Actual science say that the plan is not gonna work, energy through mass scale setting up of solar panel will pollute the environment. And the efficiency of it will drop, less densely sunny area produce less energy.
You'd argue the deal isn't enough? What is your argument base on? What is your argument to start with? You didn't name any.
Stop typing propaganda lines that sound heroic but it's totally fake. Pal, if you can't give an argument, get a source, applying logic, I suggest staying silent.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
carconarco No, I did research it, pal. First of all, read the actual report and then do some thinking about your comparison. Canada have way much less people, and way much less things that we do have that pays and be ensures through federal budget. For example, freedom of countless things, actual urgency at emergency rooms, free market for drugs, since the only reason drug companies developed those medicine that your country could renegotiate through your government is made to be consumed in our country, what else. 3 times the population doesn't means 3 times the cost. It's usually more like 9 times, want to know why? Because the number of people who actually contribute to the budget is not tripled. Want to learn some math then? Maybe going back to school and finish it. Don't talk about Canada like the system is working, you rank 10th while we rank 11th. We're not gonna bet our future on a system that is bound to fail because either it works or it doesn't, want to check, Sweden and Canada, know why you're failing now? We should be putting our future on a system that actually secure our rights if we actually do the work.
2
-
Alan Gonzalez No, it has not, where's that confirmation, if you actually read the Koch Brothers research, you would see that it doesn't indicate whether single payer system is cheaper or not. It indicates the total amount of money that would be spent on it in order to achieve minimal standard. It doesn't mention quality, although it did mention a brief conclusion that in order for that plan to work, we'll have to double the tax rate and then people's savings will have to be replenish at some rate to pay for it because perfect scenarios do not happen. That money saved up, the fantasize "2 trillions" are 2 trillions in the total cost, which doesn't mean that we'll have 2 trillions more in the federal budget. It means that the entire amount of money that will be spent on healthcare by all sources, rich people paying for the poor, the lazy, and corporate taxes will also have to be raised, the entire sum will be reduced by 2 trillions, even though it clearly means stealing, put a massive postpone button on our economy, probably unemployment rates raising because corporate can't make that much money in order to gain profit s, and low quality healthcare plus less medical discovery. Here's an advice kid, when you don't understand something, think about first and then type. "Bills come due", it means that if you laze around, getting drunk at 8a.m, there are consequences, who do you think those 40000 people are, are they geniuses, are they hard workers, or are they hobos, beggers, drug addicts, alcoholics? If you want the society to take care of them, maybe you should go and do that, join the Peace Corp, go plant a tree, don't force others to take care of you. I paid enough to charity at places that actually need them such as Africa, and I don't want to pay anything to people with unlimited potential and choose to waste it. It's America, go get a job at 7 eleven and live a life, kid.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gonzalochocanoart That's what you think, sorry, go overseas and ask people, I did, they loved Trump, especially Asian countries now that he's taking care of China cheating.
Obama took unemployment from disaster to normal, that's not how math works, the lower the unemployment gets, the harder it is to lower, study.
Kid, Uber driving isn't counted as a job, , and if it's counted then it's not enough for people to pay any taxes. So they're still getting government's benefits.
Check your measurements, life expectancy lowers as obesity increases, so much for your "no body shaming" nonsense. Don't make up fake stats, kid.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Fridman intervention about that quote on Zionism is absurd and insane. Just because there's a war doesn't mean you can expell, kill, anybody you want. Was there war trials? Were those people, nearly half a million people convicted on crimes against the state of Israel? Or is it they kill and expel people indiscriminately on no charges, no trial, no conviction, no due process?
There's a war, fought by some people, and the the Zionists expell almost every Arabs just on the basis of them being Arabs, without trial, without due process, without justification. It doesn't matter if they retain 20% of it, they expelled 80% of the Arabs, that's disgusting enough.
2
-
2
-
2
-
When you stop building infrastructure for 40-50 years, your technology lag behind, homie. The fact that the newly built houses are still made of wood showcase America inferiority in technology.
Furtuhermore, I don't know where you get the nonsense of latrines and no running water, if that's the case then it's an extremely small percentage of the total population there. Because like you said, in the newly built cities, the infrastructure are so advanced that there are no latrines. Their schools and hospitals are not built with cheap material, I don't know what propaganda source you're quoting from, but their schools and hospitals are built using normal steel and concrete, far cheaper than in the US because they make those materials themselves with government subsidies.
It is you who have a lot of misinformed opinions, a lack of understanding in mathematics and physics. Please, stop living in the 1970s, get back to reality.
2
-
2
-
@darkstorm2579 He cut the operating cost by a lot without any significant damage?
Pretty sure that's a win.
Twitter usage just reached an all time high.
So I don't know where you get your news, probably MSNBC, but you should change it quickly.
People use Twitter because it's an interesting experience, as long as there are users, the business model runs itself. Just like Facebook, if Zuckerberg doesn't mess with the cash flow by going into the Metaverse thing, Facebook is a stable monopoly.
So I don't know why you think Twitter is in ruin, the users number didn't lower, it increases. More users, less employee, less costs.
Go learn some math.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@zimmer9999 First off, kid. There's no lack of opportunity, unless you're saying that you get discriminated every single time in your life. If that happens, it might be because your lack of qualification, not your skin color. And the economic opportunity? Like I said, minimum wage is more than enough to acquire you and adequate education, bad choices, maybe you know, invest in a book instead a saxophone. Not everybody in the black community chose that, just a lot of people in the black community chose that. Stop typing nonsensical emotional rant, you want to know real discrimination? Real struggle? Go to an Asian country where children are studying your college material and still being cast as stupid and like African countries where people don't have water to drink.
Idiot.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No, pal. You don't understand what Superman is. The version you see in the comics, the all goody no evil boy scout that stands for truth, justice and the American Way.
Like the American Way itself, it's full of lies and holes. This is the real Superman, sure he is all good and righteous, but only by enduring incredible pain and hardship.
That is life, well intention is always met with the uncompromising nature of life, that is "human". What makes Superman human is his imperfections, the comic has been ignoring this for far too long.
Superman snap Zod's neck, but by doing so, he felt incredible pain, that's who he is.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@maninthemiddle55 Totally unnecessary? You think Osama Bin Laden was killed only by one operation? You think that getting rid of Al Queda means we're not threatened by terrorist? Go to Aleppo, kid, to see what kind fo things used to happen there, and ask yourself what kind of things the people who did the things at Aleppo wouldn't dare to do with the US? The movie got one thing right, we won't apologize for keeping your friends and family safe. North Korea is scary? Lool back at Iraq. ISIS is an embodiment of radical Islamic terrorism, you idiot think that terrorism lies in organizations, pathetic, we smarter people know that that terrorism lies in the terrorist beliefs, remove ISIS, one day they'll formed a new one with a new name. Before ISIS, it's Al Queda, after ISIS, something else. Like how we understand a war with idiocy lies in your idiot mind and not just idiotic representatives, war against Terror is against the idea of terrorism, not an organization. Too difficult for you to understand? Cheney knew the same thing, you people can't comprehend the idea of it "the people found it confusing, they want a country". Use your brain
2
-
@maninthemiddle55 Okay, pal. You're not providing any evidence of the war's purpose. You claim it however you want it to be, we didn't start a war just to give company oil field, idiot. The companies want the oil field once we're done with the war. Pathetic.
The war against Iraq is the war against Terror, you're mistaken the idea of terrorism and terrorist organization. The war against terror is against terrorism, not against terrorist organizations, the organizations are a part of terrorism. "They haven't been", idiot, not that they won't, not that they can't, they just haven't been. Iraq is a sanctuary for terrorism, that unstable part, in any form could aid massive terrorist organizations any time, there is no restriction on them, no intervention possible, no oversight, no democracy, endless resources. Use your brain, just because the fire hasn't caught on to the haystack doesn't mean we're gonna let a haystack next to the fire, that's total nonsense.
You believe in what you believe alone, not based on any facts, any evidence, any reasoning. Your plan of counter terrorism by "teaching", you can't teach at places where you don't have control. Why do you think they need to ivade Iraq if they can teach Iraqi's children? Use your brain.
Your thesis, uncorroborated, based on all assumption , is trash thesis, worthless. Clear, go back to school, pal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cadicamo8720 You make a few mistakes in that very short reply that only a very slow and uninformed individual can make, but that's not surprising.
1. Just because you're nuclear super power doesn't mean you can't be provoked, especially by another nuclear superpower. Example: US being provoked by Cuba in combination with the Soviet in 1963, or just right before that when the Soviet was provoked by the US in combination with Turkey.
2. The closest form of fascism we have is of course Nazism, and the only place in the world that harbors active Nazi is Ukraine. You have the report from the New York Times about Ukrainian and Nazis, you have the Nazis emblem on Ukraine military elite forces, you have their President literally applauding an actual WW2 Nazis, which Poland is asking to be extradited. The Canada parliament joined in so maybe the second most Nazified place on Earth is Canada.
3. The only Imperialist country with an massive obession of invading and dominating people and territories whom it literally has no relation to or jurisdiction upon is the United States. In the last 20 years, the examples are invasion of Afghanistan, invasion of Iraq, regime change operation in Lybia, regime change operation in Syria, current supplying of arms in a genocide in Gaza. Of course this is accompanied by 800 military bases around the world, all of them on foreign soil , including a few illegal military bases on the soil of countries that directly declare that the bases are illegal such as Iraq and Syria.
How about grabbing a book once in a while, or read books digitally, either case it will help you.
2
-
@OldLizard
1. You can't say that there are more Nazis in Ukraine than anywhere else on Earth is because you're uninformed and kind of slow. You literally have an official military unit of them in their military and their official national hero is literally a known Nazi collaborator, January 1st is Bandera day in Ukraine. This isn't a matter of opinion, this is fact. Literally no European country has a national hero that collaborated with the Nazis in WW2 except for Ukraine. Literally none. Like I said, go grab a book.
2. You definitely have never travelled around the world, because seemingly you think the world actually means what you called "the West", which is less than 20% of global landmass and less than 15% of global population. ICJ Court ruling of 15 judges from 15 different country reaches a conclusion that there is possible grounds for the conclusion that Israel is comitting a genocide and orders Israel to file more detailed report to the court.
Within those 15 judges, include 1 Israeli appointed judge, and even that judge ruled with the 14 country majority.
Right now, the ICJ is also hearing a case where over 50 countries is giving their argument about Israel illegal occupation of Palestine, and among those 50 countries, about 45 to 46 of them, consisting at least 30% of global population, and consist of 85% of the population of the 50 countries speaking. Those overwhelming majority of countries recognize that Israel is committing illegal occupation of Palestine territory, meaning Israel has zero right of self defense against Palestinian attack. This is simple logic.
Are you one of the flat earthers who think that if you go beyond Western Europe then you'll fall over the edge of the world? Therefore you just ignore the overwhelming majority of global population?
2
-
@mo8720 Buddy, you're going to need better argument than these incoherent sentences, broken chain of reasoning as well as unsubstantiated use of adjectives.
1. If you measure Imperialism level by the number of countries one country invaded, intervended or overthrow, the count for the USA will be 6. Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Ukraine. Russia only invaded 2 in Georgia and Ukraine. And the drastic difference here is that historically, at least Russia has a claim over those territories and direct security concern over their neighbors while USA has zero claim. ZERO.
2. In the Cuba situation, what all sane people would support is that the USA not putting their missile in Turkey at the first place, not provoking other people. You know, the grown up approach, which was enacted by American President John F Kennedy. I know you also suck at your own history so look him up, buddy.
But maybe I'm going too harsh on you. Go study proper English, and then we'll talk.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
She yelled 2 lies in a 6 seconds span
0:38 The kids from Bronx don't suffer from asthma due to carbon, if she knows again, science, carbon emission went to the atmosphere, they do suffer from dirty living environment, and they will continue once most of the parents are out of work because her "deal" eliminate cars. And like how she removed jobs from New York, again, nice hypocrisy.
0:42 wow, j, the lead water crisis in Flint, it's due to poor water treatment. Lack of money, you use lead pipes to do it, that's why there is lead. But her deal will probably bankrupt the city, therefore making the problem even worse. They can't build new pipes anymore, because she will ban steel. Now that is again, hypocrisy.
Does anybody who support her actually know anything?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jackdaniels3573 The concept of computer has already been invented before Steve Jobs, so you're going to say that the innovation of Apple has no meaning?
The difference between the Apple II and the traditional "computer" is massive, my friend.
Tesla was a scientists, his contributions to science is great, he didn't invent much, at least he didn't invent what matters to the ordinary people. Contributions behind the scene is acknowledged when you digged into what's behind the scene.
Tesla got his place in the scientific community, but not in the every-day world.
Because we deemed that Edison's contribution, not just light bulb, but also phonograph, kinetograph, alkaline batteries are more common and easier to understand than polyphase.
Tesla was not denied a place in history, the study of electricity use an entire SI unit after him. Edison got none.
2
-
@jackdaniels3573 Tesls did not invent alternating current, you moron.
Study real science, kid.
Neither did he invent remote control, X-ray or logic chip.
Those things are invented afterwards based on the principles which Tesla might have contributed too.
By your moronic logic, Tesla is also a thief who stole from Faraday, Maxwell and every other scientists before him who's studied electricity.
Tesla X-ray have no use today, kid, X-ray technology have come so far, not too mention Tesla did not invent X-ray.
But your argument is sincerely pathetic.
You have denied to acknowledge facts or logic, are you a desperate fanboy or a troll?
The engines in the 1900s have application today? Really? Nice try, moron, unless you're an idiot, trains stop going by steam engine.
Don't be a desperate troll, pal. Tesla contributed much, but not that much.
You desecrated Tesla memory with lies, don't do that, it's disgusting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not really. The kryptonite spear is still there, so worst case scenario, Batman will use it to kill Doomsday eventually, he will have a plan, of course, Doomsday might destroy Metropolis first.
But once Batman kills Superman, there must be some notification, Lex has the whole place under watch some how. Doomsday was born in the Genesis Chamber on the Kryptonian Ship, in that chamber, there's a failsafe to terminate the creature being born if there's any trouble.
"If man can't kill God, the devil will do it", it should be believed that had Batman successfully killed Superman, Lex would have stopped Doomsday creation. Remember, there was a time gap for about 30 minutes in the movie where Batman goes from sparring Superman to finishing saving Martha, during that time, by cutting the power, Lex could've stopped Doomsday creation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DogshitArgument He seems well-read because you don't read, buddy.
You claim something is out of context, that's an opinion, not even a good opinion because you don't give any supporting arguments.
All those judges disagreed, if you take a poll, people disagree. Furthermore, those ICJ quotes that Burnelli brought up isn't even the best quotes of the case.
The emphasizeds quotes are the "Amalek" quotes of Netanyahu, "No water, no food, no electricity" quote by Gallant, and the Amalek chant by Israeli soldiers inside Gaza. Obviously you wouldn't know about any of this because you don't read. But that's not something I'd be proud of.
I mean you intentionally took 3 weakest quote out of like 84 quotes, including very serious ones and pretend as if those 3 represent the entirety of the 84
If you remove those 3, there's 81 left. And you can't even remove those 3. Because whatever justification you can give for a quote, the impact and the nature of that quote can be used for people to conclude about your intent. In the court of law, even if the defendant defense himself by saying that quote is out of context, the jury, the judge can still say that, you claim that but we don't believe you. And in this case, the jury dismissed Israel argument entirely that those quotes are all out of context. It is an indictment, pal. Before the trial, there's preliminary hearings. If you have no case, the case is dismissed. If there's a trial, it means that the case is serious, this is basic legal procedures. And of course you wouldn't know it because you don't read.
Buddy, you need to grow up and go back to school.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johnkillinger453 You're not even reading, kid. You don't have the right to tear down a war memorial, honoring soldiers just because they're shaped like a cross. It's a memorial honoring soldiers dying on the battlefield for their beliefs. Not a religious memorial, it's not a church. If you take the memorial down then you should abolish any grave that is shaped like a cross, right? Including thousands of those in Arlington? Learn to think, kid. And even if that is a religious memorial, there's no such law requires you not to have it.
Congress shall make no law putting a religion over the other, you need to proof that this memorial is built for the purpose of putting one religion over the other, and not just to honoring the religion of ones who died.
You're way over your head trying to argue this, so I suggest you go back to school.
Freedom of religion. It's one thing to build a memorial, it's an entirely different thing to remove one. This memorial has been built by previous administration, and you'll need substantial reason to remove it. Otherwise, Arlington, White House, Monument of Liberty can all be disposed by the current administration.
2
-
@johnnypenso9574 Yes pal, that's what I'm saying. The majority of Asian students come from poor families, and that's not actually poor, just not high enough to be adequate in the American society. Therefore admitting them in force the school to provide aids, and why should they give out money to 10 exact people with no major difference, are you Asian, I'm Asian. Went to Columbia, there are Asians who got in because they're different than the rest, it's just that the population of Asian is too much so that those who got it can't change the graphic. Clear?
People with gold medal IMO, international Physics from my country did get in because those are actual achievements, example, Ngo Bao Chau, Fields Medal winner.
But getting high grades in an intellectually poor education is not. The SAT, any Asians rooted students could get 800 on Math easily, because we studied in a different manners. But do those manners can translate into excellence, no.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ZachDotsey Because your theory is wrong, dangerous, and just purely mob rule?
Pal, here's the thing, you're in a Union. The people in your state, could be plenty, but that's in your state. America is one united Union which are consisted of states, the privilege which your states are having might come from other states that people may not live in because those are rural states, but those states still contribute.
If the Union, which is represent by the Electoral College, Alaska is still a state that contribute plenty despite small population. Their voice has to be protected.
Don't be a xenophobe.
2
-
2
-
@ZachDotsey Yeah, pal, nice try. That's what you think. Because you're ignorant and consider people's right in smaller states are nonsensical.
People in Wyoming have rights, don't be xenophobic to people who are not your state.
The electoral college maintains a balance, if you can't win the electoral college, you can not be President because you've ignored too many states.
Popular vote here, the founding fathers have foreseen this.
If popular only focuses on one state, because that state has a big difference, then should that state be able to dictate the other states?
It's cool you win the popular vote, but you won the popular vote mostly due to one state, not 20 to 30 states.
It's a balance. What you are proposing is not a balance.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
David Williams You have no argument against any fact anybody have given out, so are you a troll or a moron? Either way, go back to school, kid.
Here, UBI is stealing money, you're giving money to people who don't work by taking the majority from the people who do work, and your excuse for that is because their jobs are being replaced. Now that is really stupid, when somebody is out of work, you find them new job, not give them free money, assistance might come, but need to be returned, otherwise it is a handout. Because if they don't have jobs, they don't pay tax, the money they're given is not like stockholders privilege, they haven't put any money in for equity.
If people don't create values anymore, taxing tech companies will not make any money, they don't have jobs, they can't pay, they can't buy stuff, tech companies will fail, aka, your taxing will not work.
Your big idea is to change them from workers in storage housing into what? Nurses? Painters? Artists? All of the above requires a market, which the people worked in storage housing used to be and now if the market is gone, or severely gone undersized, those jobs value will also decrease.
Now I get your intention, it's good, you need to figure out a way to adapt to change, the unfortunate thing is that your way is stupid.
If giving people free money can make more money, they would've done it already, but wait, nobody does it, even socialist countries, because the presumption of it is anti-science. Go back to school, kid.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mirzabaig4711 I don't think you understand how economics and human behavior works, pal.
The world already has a store of value, that's in hard limited commodities that are reasonably well distributed. It's called gold and oil. Real things that people have confidence in for centuries, and with oil, decades to come.
Now the value of gold is actually full of make belief because it does nothing, but overwhelming majority of people believes in it and it has been used for hundreds of years.
That's why it's valuable. You believe in this fictional reality where Bitcoin will replace gold, but you give no reason why would anybody choose bitcoin over gold.
They possess the same characteristics, except that bitcoin is wasting energy way more than it should, so even if there's a replacement of gold as a store of value, it will be one of the alternative coins, that uses less electricity than bitcoin.
But they key is this, why would people choose a new store of value method that introduce instability to their lives? They already have one, right now. It's gold.
Proposing a new theory with absolutely no reason of why the theory is correct is just insane.
2
-
2
-
@hipsonsogbo Keep it real, homie. Dogecoin or bitcoin or another kind of shitcoin.
It can't serve as a store of value because that depends on the value of belief. There's no reason for nearly 7 billion people around the world to wake up one day and say, hey, we already have gold and things but let's change it to bitcoin or any of the other shitcoin. The point of a store of value is that the confidence in it is stable, and that stable nature makes it very very unlikely they people just adopt a new one for no reason.
And it can't serve as a mean of transaction , at least bitcoin can not, is because it's reserves is unfairly distributed among's people. That's why in every kind of revolution against an unfair regime, the newly formed government issued their money instead of using the old currency. If it's not fairly distributed, it can not be used. Or at least, it has to be fairer than the current system, and it is not.
Bitcoin or dogecoin, altogether, they're just shitcoin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's because you don't understand context. That "Destiny" guy is the only guy that constantly interrupted Finkelstein, furthermore, he intentionally presented not argument, but plain false argument in which he knows nothing about. That's what happens when you put unqualified individuals in.
It's like a Physics Professor having to argue a point like this. "But this Wikipedia page says that quantum entanglement disprove Newton's mechanics". While at the same time he has no knowledge about what quantum entanglement is, how to calculate basic quantum mechanics, and he also doesn't know what Newton's mechanics is.
Pal, have standards.
And Finkelstein never lied about facts, please distinguish facts from your opinions, okay? Benny Morris wrote something as Finkelstein quote is a fact. Now Benny Morris claim he meant something else by that quote and is taken out of context not a fact, it's an opinion.
If Hitler said he was "taken out of context", it's an opinion.
Finkelstein said that out of 17 ICJ judges, high level judges, 15 of them agreed that there's plausibility for genocide, that's a fact.
Burnelli claiming that all those 15 judges are incompetence or biased, or that "plausibility" is an extremely low standard, those are his uninformed opinions. And it's uninformed because he knows nothing about the judges, their verdict or the law.
Learn to distinguish what is fact and what is opinion, pal. You need it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Retrostarscream Listen, pal. I just debunked your myth. You can't attempt to obstruct, obstruct is an act that happens immediately, just like you can attempt to commit perjury, study, pal. Stop typing propaganda nonsense.
And immunity goes off after the term but there's no case anymore, what case? They just declared no crime, Mueller report declared him innocent, Mueller gave up his title by not giving out a conclusion, therefore Barr made that conclusion, it's the law. Study. Mueller's job wasn't to charge people, it was to find out crimes, he didn't find any. You found it, you say that there is, you don't, you say that there isn't. No middle ground nonsense, it's called distracting.
And your entire previous comment, I debunked them too, pal. Read, the policy doesn't matter, you're hired for doing a report, which includes a conclusion, Ken Starr, Mueller didn't finish, he gave up and therefore the roles go to Barr, who declared no obstruction, no collusion as in lack of evidence, and if you're not guilty then you're innocent.
If you're gonna keep typing a myth and pretend that it's a fact, i suggest staying quiet would be the better option.
2
-
@Retrostarscream Hey listen, kid. I know you're desperate but just don't be a troll here. I just refuted all your sources as in pointed how you're lying about the source. Those aren't sources, those are you lying of what the source actually means.
1. According to the McGhan story and Donald Trump telling him to deny the story of The President ordering to terminate the Special Counsel. This entire interpretation of Mueller and yours is based on a slippery slope definition. The definition of obstruction.
Obstruction means perverting of justice, and you need to prove that the action of telling McGhan to tell a version of the story that McGhan doesn't feel comfortable with, or even that McGhan interpreted in an entire different way, therefore leading to misunderstanding of what the meeting is about and what he was told to do, is not related to "justice" at any point. So if The President told his son to say that they served Polish Vodka instead of Russian Vodka would also be obstruction?
It relates to the Russian connection, think a bit pal. The detail of whether The President tell Don McGhan to say this or that, doesn't matter at all, because what he say, is not related in anyway to the investigation or any of the charges.
That is my analysis to refute that passage of The Mueller Report, you know what this is called, it's called thinking, not just quoting false information like you.
2. That second paragraph you quoted about prosecuting somebody after office. That's just total irrelevant, Mueller there just typed a standard line, announcing himself to have executed his job properly, which is his opinion alone.
That statement about " conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available", what, SO IF THE PRESIDENT HAS IMMUNITY AFTER OFFICE THEN THEY WILL NOT CONDUCT A THOROUGH FACTUAL INVESTIGATION? OR IS IT THEY WON'T PRESERVE ANY EVIDENCE?
President has no immunity after office, but in order to charge them for the same crime as the crime that has already been investigated, they need to have declared him guilty in the report, Mueller didn't do that, Ken Starr did that, and in that case, if Clinton wasn't acquitted by the Senate, he would've been prosecuted after office. In Trump case, you can't charge him, you have nothing, what crime? You have an example up for suggestion and no conclusion, except for the conclusion that had to be made because of Mueller's incompetency, by Barr saying that he's not guilty. So yeah, they can preserve evidence, there's nothing to charge him. Mueller's words in that paragraph is just basic procedures.
3. Your thesis of Mueller Press Conference, THAT IS HIS FALSE OPINION. KEN STARR DID IT WITH CLINTON, IF MUELLER DIDN'T COME UP WITH A CONCLUSION, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHY, HE FAILED TO DO HIS JOBS.
IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW HE FEEL, THE FACT IS THERE, MUELLER GAVE UP HIS CREDIBILITY WHEN HE REFUSED TO FINISH THE WORK.
It doesn't matter how Mr. Incompetent feels , if he can't conclude guilty, by his conscious calling or moral calling or whatever, by the Constitution of the United States, he declared that Donald Trump is innocent, as in how every citizen is innocent until proven guilty. Clear? Pal, stop posting lies that you made up.
4. "The constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrong doing". Again, this is his opinion alone, The Constitution require a different process to remove the President from office, but to ACCUSE, NO IT DOESN'T NEED A DIFFERENT PROCESS TO ACCUSE. DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER HE FEELS IF THIS IS FAIR OR NOT, THAT IS THE LAW AND THERE'S NO SUCH LAW BAN HIM FROM MAKING A CONCLUSION, HE GAVE UP.
So yeah, pal, stop posting lies that you made up.
Finally, if you already know that your argument are dumb as hell and you're still typing it because you're trolling, I suggest going back to school, small time troll.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Chris-oz9qx How do I tell you this simply.
Kid, the money spent on transfer is the least of your concern. Player wages, stadium maintenance, those are the fees that you have to pay, despite not getting enough benefits for them.
The transfer money can be cut by not doing anymore transfer. But existing player wages have to be paid. Usually those are paid by ticket selling revenue.
Are you buying any tickets?
Those clubs don't care for the Domestic League revenue, they want a bigger share of the European football revenue.
The Super League is created to replace the Champions League, not the Domestic League like Premier League or La Liga.
Originally there wasn't any Champions League, they create the Champions League as a way to get more money. The qualification nonsense was originally only the winning team, but they expand the slots because big teams also need qualification to increase the tournament's revenue, despite not being the winning team.
The competition changes all the time, each time benefiting the big clubs, because only the big clubs generate revenue.
So get down from your high horse of hypocrisy and get back to reality. Clubs are dying, because people can't go to the stadiums, there's nothing you can do about that, so let them live by maximizing the revenue.
It's not about you, the new Super League is for the international fans. Football is nothing without fans, well, you are no longer the only fans of football. Fans are everywhere, the fans overseas are demanding this.
You might be interested in Burnley vs Manchester United, but we are not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Strange Quark No, those aren't facts, kid, those are your assumption, here's why:
You can't prove the reason why he didn't show the footage, my conclusion after watching the taped version is that the "interview" was a footage of Tucker trying to debate a clown, idiot Dutchman failed to give any argument, any counter argument, he insult the channel and the anchor. So it's a worthless interview full of lies, no reason to show it.
Again, you can't prove that this is an excuse, because you can't prove that he did anything wrong.
So yeah, your argument crumbled, if you want to learn how to give out better arguments, I suggest going to college.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reudensplasher1659 You're just messing with something that you don't understand. Here's a summary, kid, you're way over your head, go back to school first.
Here's the basic which you need to grasp before discussing about those issues:
1. THE WORLD ISN'T PERFECT OR FAIR
2. THIS COUNTRY'S RESOURCES ARE FINITE
3. THE LEADERS OF THIS COUNTRY SHOULD USE IT'S RESOURCES TO SERVE THE GOAL OF MAKING THE COUNTRY BETTER.
Think about these 3 things really hard and you'll see the problem. They broke the laws which we created. The laws created in order to protect and sustain this country, those same laws are as equal as the one we used to sentence people to prison, the same laws which prevent homicide, racism, oppression and protect the right of liberty. You go against those laws without adequate reasons then you have no place in our society, maybe it isn't fair but if you can't propose anything better, you should shut up. Go ahead, propose something better, and then run for some position in the public office, so you can achieve your goals, if you can, you're welcome. Otherwise, like I said, GO BACK TO SCHOOL.
1
-
@reudensplasher1659 To quote nobody and based on a actual facts, kid. More illegal immigrants don't means that you're life's gonna be better. It does mean that you can't control who's in and out of your country which means dangerous things could happen, for example, drug dealing and terrorist attacks. That politician you quoted may have known that one thing, I know more, and border security officers know even more, I'll bet on them instead of that one guy who didn't support his statement by anything.
To summarize, kid, if you're too lazy to read, just read the all caps part. JUST BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MEAN ABSOLUTE BADNESS, DOESN'T MEAN IT'S GOOD. WE DON'T ACT ON ABSOLUTENESS. AS IN HOW WE ALREADY THAT NOTHING IS TRULY ABSOLUTE. SO WE ACT ON PROBABILITY, CALCULATION AND LOGIC. IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THOSE THINGS, LIKE I SAID, GO BACK TO SCHOOL.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billygiles3276 That's what you get when you used intellectual property theft plus a gigantic market and countless resources.
They're more fortunate, but don't mistaken luck for good policy.
US has bad policies, the policies wasting money are never capitalism, national debt is always due to socialism delusions, sometimes due to wars, but mostly socialism delusions, medicare, medicaid, Obamacare, all those irrelevant tax that took from people to give it to other people inefficiently and uselessly,
It all started with Blowjob Bill and hit a trainwreck with Hussain something.. Go ahead, keep spending money you don't have, using policies that only steal but create none, that gets you in debt.
The difference between new tax and tax cut is that tax cut gives back money to generate growth, people who can make money needs to have money to spend and work more, but social programs, they took money from people who made it and give it away, they devalue the money as well as encourage people not to do anything to get the free money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thebat729 Do you actually watch the movie, pal.
The entire movie portrays Lex Luthor motive, which are very much a correct motive. everything inside this speech leads the final sentence.
Man can have knowledge with no power, and that's paradoxical.
He's frustrated with the people's false perception of what is true greatness, what is true power. How people worship Superman for having these god-like power, how people ignore Lex Luthor, who is the peak of human existence intellectually.
He believes Superman is a fraud.
The story of the ancient Greeks just leads to how he feels about the world, full of people blinded, just like the Greeks, who somehow believe in a version of good and bad that totally put them in hardships.
The idea of kings and queens, of Gods who are able to kill people at will.
Look pal, the Greeks believed something incredibly stupid, and there's no basis for their beliefs.
Not any known basis that man can recreate, are you really going to say that the man whom children got executed just because the "priest" said so were happy because the "priest" words were the words of the Gods?
You truly believe that the level of suffering among the people in ancient Greece were at the same percentage as it is now? That even if the situation is incredibly worse, the same percentage of them still felt content back then as the same percentage that felt content now?
Please.
To study history, you need to first study human psychology.
You suck at that for sure.
Pain and suffering existed as long as humans existed. And just because a few texts by a few people claim something that doesn't make it any different.
For your information, overwhelming majority of ancient Greece people don't know how to read or write, and their words were not recorded.
1
-
@thebat729 Lex is right, pal. He's right about Superman.
The guy is too dangerous, and he doesn't act on the interest of humanity, the Dark Knight future vision proves it in a way.
Lex doesn't believe that Superman will rule the planet, Lex believes that Superman can do that, and that danger is just too much.
Watch the movie again, pal. None of what you said make any sense, really.
Gods in Greek Mythology did a lot more than gave men tools, they also sort of seduced teenage girls, treat people's life as garbage, require human sacrifice, etc.
Keep it real , homie.
No, human psychology isn't molded by society, some maybe , but some remains universal throughout all cultures, including the Greeks.
Pretty sure the feeling of unfairness existed back then because countless conquests, uprisings, revenge were enacted.
The Greeks didn't invent democracy and philosophy, pal. A few excellent individuals among the entire group of people invented those things, and it's not really an effective type of democracy at all. Greek is not the earliest civilization, they might have the earliest recording of philosophical principle, but other civilizations discovered the same thing.
But that's besides the point. Overwhelming majority of people in ancient Greeks didn't know how to write or read, they were either farmers or slaves.
So study history again, pal. Not understanding the population structures and the overwhelming illiteracy probably makes you not that good of a historian.
Zeus wanted to kept humanity in the dark, to kept them worshipping the Gods.
And that, by definition, is "unfair".
1
-
@thebat729 Pal, you make the simplest mistake one can make.
You assume that just because a few guys in that ancient society invented some great things, it must mean that the rest of that society was also just as great. That's insane.
There's no such thing as "the Greek". The Greeks are composed of countless of individuals in different classes, and pretty sure a lot of them, overwhelming majority of them lived a extreme hardship, and they has a higher probability of feeling sadness and unhappiness than to feel content.
They live in fear of dying in the winters and their children can easily die at birth due to poor caring.
To assume that there was the same percentage of suffering back at ancient Greece and now in the modern world is insane, it violates certain principle of mathematics.
Are you really suggesting that somehow people in Greece are more welcome and accepting of premature death than people now?
Please.
You can't study history that way, pal. Simply because most of what you're saying are assumptions, to take the words of a few that lasted through texts, trying to use that and deduct the feelings of the entire population.
That's stupidity at it's finest. It's impossible to do that now, and it's impossible to do it then.
Keep it real, darling.
Go study real science, study real history.
If a slave in ancient Egypt can write "Save me, God" into the stones when he's in chain, certain feelings of man now and then are not so different, at least those core feelings of fairness and justice aren't that different.
So if they feel those ways, have those feelings, how can they be blind to the undeniable logic, if not intellectual inferiority.
Don't assume human intellect is the same back then, it's just not. They might believe different things, mostly because they're intellectual inferior.
Study real science.
Certain progress and achievement made doesn't excuse the idiocy of the whole.
Yeah, we're a lot smarter now, which by defaults means they were dumber then. There's nothing wrong with it but they were not as smart.
Just study some math, pal.
1
-
@thebat729
1. No I do understand Superman as a character, realistically your take on Superman is insane.
If he doesn't have a dark side, he's not human, and if he's human, he has a dark side and is too dangerous.
So either way you lost, humans are deeply flawed creatures, doesn't matter what your pamphlet says, reality said otherwise.
2. Study your mythology again. Countless times the Gods asked people to kill other people, to pitch one against another, to favor one side against another. It's full of atrocious behavior.
3. Their sacred law make no sense logically and benefits nobody except the extreme minority. Like the slaveowners, like I said, intellectual inferiority.
4. Those words are in Greece because you talk about it in the English language, countless other version of the same thing was invented elsewhere in other geographical locations, with different languages.
The idea of fairness among men is not new at all, keep it real, darling.
5. No, their beliefs aren't written by farmers, farmers don't know how to read or write. Study real history, pal.
Certain stories are folktales, but those tales are tales spreaded and engulfed through intellectual inferiority.
Like I said, if the overwhelming majority of their society is insane unintellectual, their belief possesses the same quality.
1
-
@thebat729 No, that's real.
The Greeks or any ancient society lacks the understanding of countless things. Mistaken mercury for magic, mistaken lightning for God's ability.
It's quite entertaining to see you value their beliefs so high despite knowing that they weren't that intellectually advanced.
Their understanding of the human world is deeply flawed. Some made massive contributions to academics. It's not really that significant because it's just very basic observation.
Like you can replicate Plato or Aristotle's work without having ever heard of them.
Common logical thinking existed through various cultures, not just the Greeks or the Romans. The Chinese had a pretty rich understanding of it as well.
So you know, your assumption of the validity of their beliefs is just false.
There's nothing more to it. There are proof they feel the same thing, that they feel the same about slavery, suffering, pain and death.
So what's the other reasonable explanation for their mistaken belief except stupidity.
Belief stems from reasoning, unless you're saying that the entire ancient Greek society took a look at those principles, take a deep analysis into it, taking in consideration variables of justice, fairness, all those things, and then come out with that belief, you might want to take another guess.
Most of them can't read, they can't write. Therefore their beliefs ain't that worthwhile, at least probability wise it isn't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thebat729 And I think you misunderstood Luthor's point.
Fire is a very common thing, it enriches human life greatly, yet Prometheus is punished for giving it to mankind. Showing that the ones given the absolute power can behaved in an unfair way and harm everybody else.
That doesn't seem fair. It relates to the paradox of the current government system that is restraining Lex Luthor, where he is vilified by the ones in charge because the ones in charge may not understand his motivation.
You can spin it however you want, it all boils down to the same thing, it's false.
Law of nature is broken all the time, that's what technology does, changing atomic structure, turning lead into gold, splitting electrons, defying the definition of God.
So you know, those beliefs are false, they're totally illogical, there's no Zeus, there's no Jehovah, whatever story you tell yourself, they're lies and incoherent with reality.
That's what Lex Luthor is talking about.
You made up that interpretation of Gods representing nature's law by yourself.
People back then who believed in the story just think of them as Gods, which of course it's totally false.
You spin it that way but Luthor sees it for what it is. Their stories and how they believe those stories showcases their intellectual inferiority. Just like how Luthor sees the world, full of people not understanding him.
I'm very sorry that the movie scene hurt your feelings regarding Greek Mythology or whatever, but like every other mythology in the world, they're all , simply put, proven to be false, beyond any doubt.
So keep it real, homie.
You see the stories by making up interpretation, cool.
Luthor sees the story for what it is, a demonstration of illogical human behavior.
1
-
1
-
@thebat729 Well, the meltdown in Chernobyl is the consequences of risky plant construction.
But if we don't have that, we wouldn't have handled such technologies with greater care, since the much, much more secured factories in Japan.
Accidents happen, darling.
And yes, the Bombing of Hiroshima demonstrated the risk of a known technology, which is nuclear fission, leading to the regulation of Nuclear weapons all over the world. Some countries have it but most countries do not.
Like I said, accidents happen.
There are many factors that contributed to such accidents, but they're all part of a discovering process that fuels human existence today.
Like I said, show some respect.
We've broken plenty of natural laws before those events and received nothing but progress, so it sort of make your nonsensical theory of "nature" punish us totally false.
1
-
1
-
@apriltortorici9810 He did more good to nature than you ever will, kid. Do some research. The lions there aren't wild, they're preserved, which means it cost money, resource to preserve them from being poached and captured, you don't pay any money. Don't be a hypocrite.
Lion population decline is due to poaching, illegal hunting, you want to repopulate them in the wild? They'll be killed instantly, go back to school, kid.
If an adult lion father four cups, you would need more money to sustain that four cups, this isn't some kind of "circle of life" nonsense, you need money to protect them. And if that one lion keep breeding, you'll get more lions, require more money. The trophy hunting paid for the preservation that you yell about but don't pay a dime.
The center can only sustain that many, so by logic, you need to kill some of the lions to preserve the rest. Cecil was already 13 years old, normal lifespan is 15, he was close to death, and they want to make a profit of it, instead of leaving him dying.
Go back to school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@svenboelling5251 It's not a "scientific definition", it's a logical definition.
If the definition of the words "insane" means not acting in the "normal way", then the definition of "insane" relies on the definition of "normal".
And normal means whatever the society think is normal.
In your opinion, society is stupid, and "doesn't understand much", unfortunately you are in no position to define what is stupid and what is not stupid. Because stupid in the dictionary means "lack of common sense".
The word "common" here also means whatever "society" decides as common. There are different kind of stupidity in Asia, and different kind of stupidity in Europe. Different societies.
The adjectives of the world are full of logical holes. So I suggest you study the language first to avoid using meaningless words that have no real logical meaning in the real world.
You can not redefine the meaning of a word, kid, that word is not your creation. If you use the word "insane", "normal", "stupid" according to your own definition, then you're using an unknown language to man that nobody uses except you.
Which, by normal English definition, makes you "stupid", using a mix language, where you retain the grammar of English yet use the vocabulary of an alien language that sounds like English but means totally different things. And you use this alien language to communicate with human? Not a good plan.
What society thinks is included within the definition of the word, so it does matters what society thinks, and it also means in the society point of view, you're "stupid" because you're using the wrong word.
Are you arguing in English or an alien language, study English, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@englishfury1544 No, it's not how it works. You're just lying to yourself, you can't prove or disprove something that you have no information about, so you by default saying that it doesn't exist in the society. But when talking about absolute truth, as I said, you have nothing. It's up to people's belief.
And with the electrons, maybe a few thousand years before that experiment, there was no theory, but electrons still exist, again, your argument crumbled.
Like I said, the absolute truth, you can't prove it, you can't prove any of modern physic theory, it's a theory, if you found that it is correct, than it's correct, you can't prove it. Which is why so many theories are only hypothesis and got rejected every year, and also countless previous theories are replaced by newer ones.
Nobody claim God, they claim that you don't know everything and claiming no God is just as stupid.
Don't try to lie because you've been destroyed.
1
-
@robokill387 Do you have proof? And even if that's true, then how the hell can you preserve the wild animals? You don't pay any money to help saving it, yet you criticize the guy who paid real money to help save those animals.
To sustain 4 lion cub, they would require more money than to sustain one full grown lion. If one adult lion father 4 cubs, where do you get the money?
Do you pay any? Don't be a hypocrite, there isn't enough money to keep the population naturally, to sustain the expanding population, you need more money and less animal, Cecil is over, he lived long enough, and he doesn't make any good died naturally.
Think a bit.
1
-
@riorio745 Because criminals don't care whether what kind of law you write? Kid, we ban poaching, they just don't care. Want to do some research first?
Secondly, I didn't decide, the people who actually raised him, preserved him and in charge of preservation decided, again, do some research.
Here, go back to school and learn some math, of Cecil is the father to 4 cups, there are 4 more lions but the annual finds stay the same, so to maintain, you know, logic, you need to kill Cecil, either by natural way, which you make no money, or by trophy hunting, at least some money.
You're a kid or a troll, you're very stupid. Do some research first, don't be a hypocrite, that dentist contributed more to preserving nature than you ever did.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@NickTamaire Why would what? Why would Russia and China intervene?
Well, because Africa is the fastest growing continent with untapped resources due to lack of political stability.
The influence of South Africa in the region and it's connection with the BRICS nation and the close relationship of these newly formed governments with Russia makes it a very important asset for both Russia and China.
Russia and China, being dictatorial regime with vast resources, they have the capability to intervene there with a fraction of the cost that the West must pay. Bigger return over investment.
And it's very simple how, first by supplying arms, and if necessary, supplying troops.
ECOWAS nations aren't fighting for anything, they're intervening in their neighbor business, if met with fierce resistance, they will leave.
You must be insane to think that the African countries are living in any kind of democracy, the people that hasn't been given a voice for many decades. This is their uprising.
If Russia can maintain Bashar Al Assad, they can maintain these military coup.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, and there's a risk in delivering cash. Bitcoin is useful because you can make an annonymous transactions and then convert those into cash.
So yeah, Bitcoin is a kidnapper's mean to get cash, so you're sort of correct.
Let me break it down to you, the world will never use bitcoin as a means of exchange. Because money is means of exchange for labor, therefore anybody who owns any money, has to have contributed some kind of labor to deserve that amount of money in the process. Therefore the likes of you, owning bitcoin because you bought it early or you mine a lot of it, that contributes nothing to the total "labor" in the world. And of course, that disqualifies bitcoin as a means of transaction.
Sure, certain dollars are being printed by the federal reserves, but those fiat moneys are distributed among a lot of people therefore it doesn't create an absurd inequality out of thin air. So study some math, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wmd40 Kid, Amazon doesn't pay taxes, where did you learn math? Berkeley?
What about the tax that the people work for Amazon paid? Who pays their salary?
Kid, that deal cost 44 trillions, you can remove Israel aid, it would be 10000 times less. Learn some math.
Israel takes money from their people, too, go there if that's your place. Population so few, money so great, go to China to see "insured" people, you can be insured, just that deal gives you crappy insurances.
Study something.
We send Israel money under the form of assistance, and because without them, there's no presence of US in the region filled with terrorist. Learn something, pathetic.
Oh, and we don't give corporation's money, you moron, it was their money, we took it as ours through taxation because parasites like you can't pay your dead weight. The corporations creat jobs for people that do work, 50% don't pay any taxes, they're paying more?
Go back to school if you can't get real facts or real logic. And if it sounds like I'm insulting you, snowflake, I am, you deserve to be. Despicable human being who advocate for stealing and bashing people who create most things, have some human decency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Eternal Star @Eternal Star The point is not about whether having police shall eliminate all crime, the point is that it eliminate much more crime than compared to when there isn't any police darling.
Whenever a guy who is mad at you and want to assault you, usually he would stop because he's afraid of being arrested, not because of some hidden nonsensical compassion. So get back to reality, pal. Civilians building up their own enforcement agency to enact their law is tribal warfare. Instead of having one unified police force with one clear code of conduct, you have territorial zones that enact different sort of laws the way they like, that's called chaos.
It's much less dangerous in America than Colombia, that's why people from Columbia are fleeing to America.
Whenever there's a person not punching your face off just because they can and they're angry, that's the police protecting you. 9 out of 10 cases, people stop act of aggression and violence due to fear of being caught, not "compassion".
Wake up, pal, your proposed system is still policing, it's tribal policing, which is divisive and ineffective. It creates serious division within a nation. Seemingly you don't even understand what "police" means, wake up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Eternal Star No, the cop is not here to protect you, but their cause includes protecting you as a side effect.
So they are protecting you, pal.
A car purpose is not to consume fuel, however the car has to consume fuel to deliver it's purpose. So the car does consume fuel anyway. Too confusing, darling?
You're already living under the police's protection, be grateful.
Militia groups do not work, because if you have your own militia group, nothing will stop a bigger militia group to enslave you. Little children playing with guns thinking that they can "defend" themselves? Nice try. The first sight of criminal brutality and you will run and hide, children.
The police's, the military is the biggest militia group representing the country, the specific society. Their absolute presence is what preventing you from being enslaved by another smaller militia group. You think your little community is capable of defending yourself? You don't, not against real evil.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To understand how most of your assumptions and questions are plainly wrong, you need to understand the reality and propaganda spoonfed to you by the slowly dying empire.
1. Their population is not shrinking, if it continues at this rate, it will shrink, but China is not like the US. Their government has extreme power to incentivize sudden change. It is in their tradition from ancient history to have many children. The recent one child thing is a mistaken policy that can be reversed, it's not easy but it will be reversed. The Chinese people do not think like you, so please do not assume your mentality on a population 3 times your size.
2. Their economy is not collapsing at any point, economy is not measured by GDP, or by dollars, or by anything that you're mistakenly measuring it by. It's measured by labour capacity, the ability to produce goods and services within your society. And at this level, the Chinese economy is one of the strongest ever, because of their independence in almost every significant industrial field, except for agriculture.
3. Their oil cannot be cut off, because they have a partnership with Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia. You fundamentally overestimate US military capability. If you blockade their country using military power, you're declaring war and you will be destroyed first. The China Russia alliance makes them invincible, far stronger than the US, and that partnership solves the China agriculture problems. The US will starve to death before the Russians, and that's not an opinion, that's a fact, calculable by the area of farmable land and agriculture technology.
You sir, are a victim of really bad propaganda. You have to wake up and join the sane people.
For over 4000 years of history, China has been the center of human civilization and power, what happened in the last 300 years or so is not going to change the trend.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@suprotyv7534 Jobs that keep them from begging for free money, kid.
They might poor, but they're not stupid. They're poor due to harsh "sanctions", if that's what you're calling imposed on them, they're poor maybe due to inflation, but they're not stupid.
Unemployment is 5% but the rest 95%, at least doing decent jobs. Want to see the difference between 2 countries, kid. Go to Moscow, and then go to San
Francisco, the "homelessness" is the biggest difference.
And also, people do pay taxes in Russia, unlike American 47%,
The obvious thing, they don't beg or demand free money. Go back to school, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@suprotyv7534 Nice try, you troll. Free food here as in food given out daily by people to save them from starvation, not food free for holiday, not discount on holiday, are you stupid?
They don't fight for it, some wants it, some don't. They try to get it, it's free. It's called holiday, kid. Ever watched shopping spree, people want free stuff? You're going to say that people also ran out of clothing just because people want free stuff?
Don't try to twist the argument, you troll. Begging for money here as in begging for higher tax, claiming that you have rights for other people's money.
Those free food are given out as discount, not to save them from starvation. Nice try, don't say things you don't understand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lord Rosemary First of all, the CNN guy didn't read the report, or he's playing dumb to brushing up Cortez's ass. Anybody who actually read and still claim to be "supporting" of it is plain lying, and it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kuroru69 Honestly, just because you add the word "disorder" after a word you made up trying to describe what you see is not really an understanding. Like I said, it's a gigantic guessing game.
And like I said again, what "Hawking" did is theoritical physics, it's all in theory, can never be proven. You can say it's also a big guessing game with theoretical physics, maybe that's why we don't really care about their results, it's rarely used in any applications.
The theories that can be proved, however, which were predicted, those are the ones that I'm talking about. For example, the the heisenberg uncertainty principle, or the planck constant, theories that were proven to be true based on experimental results. Like Dirac prediction of positron.
Some say that those theories are incomplete, but you can never deny the results that they succesfully calculated for an overwhelming majority of cases.
See the drastic difference in the level of accuracy?
1
-
@kuroru69 In short, Physics, and other natural sciences, formulate a theory and test that theory trying to explain the natural world. And the degree of accuracy is incredibly detailed. The theory must have computational consequences and can be verified, be measured.
Meanwhile psychiatrist, they also try to explain human behavior, but not based on any principle, they based it on judgement make belief, the bad part about this about this is you can never tell whether they're right or not. Because there's no measurement, there's no quota, it's all fairy dust. They might have done some good, no doubt, but it's all based on their preferences, their judgement, and that might be the best way possible to treat something so complex, but their best is not good enough because the margin of error is just too big. Still just more of a guidelines than undeniable rules.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chesshooligan1282 Have you ever paused to consider that the people in Africa doesn't really care that much about chess?
No chess youth training and therefore the number of people playing the game is less?
Over the last 100 years, the number of Russian chess champions are ovewhelming, does that mean Slavic origin people are smarter than non Slavic origin people?
You use a ridiculous set of standards. People in Africa has far bigger concern than playing chess.
The same goes with Fields Medal Winner, for the last 100 years, a lot has been going on in Africa in that span, darling, that entire continent is not even a peaceful continent yet.
The same goes with the Nobel Prize. All of those things existed within the last 100 years, the human race have existed for over 4000 years.
A lot longer before that, Egypt is the cradle of civilization. The Alexandria Library, scholars from everywhere travel to Egypt. So back then does it make the Egyptian the smartest people on Earth?
Kid, you need to learn to distinguish is what is really intelligence, what are meaningless titles.
An award, chess player, Nobel prize, Fields medal, they're just awards in particular field, most notably awarded to people with discovery, not intelligence.
Go study real science and you'll see how accidental discovery plays a massive role in those awards, not intelligence, hard work and discovery.
The Nobel prizes have only existed for 120 years. During that 120 years, colonialism, world war and terrorism destroyed 2 major continents in Asia and Africa.
The reason America has the most Nobel prizes is not because Americans are the most intelligent, it's because shortly after the Nobel Prize was invented, 2 massive world war happened and America was protected due to it's geographical location. The European intellectuals immigrated to America, bringing along their education and research works, thus make America has the most Nobel Prizes, but the origin of such intellects and knowledge comes from Europe, and even before that, the Europeans took their knowledge from the Egyptians and Indians.
1
-
@chesshooligan1282 Go learn some math, darling. The one clinging onto the lie here is you. The achievement and advancement of science and engineering has very little to do with intelligence level, it has a lot to do with the appropriate external environment and funding.
Those universities built on the wealth you stole from other continents, the privileges and perks of oppression fueled the future generation of scholars.
Before America, it was British, before British, it was France, before France, it's Italy and Spain, before that, it's Rome, before Rome, it's Greece, before Greece, it's Egypt, China and India.
Knowledge is passed down from all over the world, every continents, every race made their contributions. It's the eventual brutality and outstanding military individuals that shifted the power of balance.
The only reason America is at the privileged of funding every single student loans as well as acquiring the latest scientific equipments to their labs has nothing to do with American's intellectual superiority, it's because American government manipulated the currency via their petroleum policy that gives America a surplus flow of wealth.
Just like how America got to the Moon, via a German scientist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chesshooligan1282 Again, kid. All of those fields are measured within the last 100 years and in the last 100 years, things are going on around the world.
You dumb Americans are bad in geography and history.
But anyway, by including computer science, you made a horrible mistake.
The most sought after computer engineers are always Indians, Palestinians as well as Iranians, and right now even Chinese.
So there, your argument falls apart, the newly excited field of computer science in a way showcases the superiority of another race compared to Caucasians.
But again, that's not inherently due to race nature, it's because those specific countries intentionally focus on that field training. Again, field specific achievement.
Don't use metaphor when you're incapable of understanding them, kid.
Comparing between races is not comparing between humans and cheetahs. It's like comparing the Northern Africa rhino with the Southern Africa Rhino. Barely any differences except in the numbers.
Go learn some real math, kid. You've been destroyed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It means the dollars will become a worthless, currency that can not be traded in the global market. It will end any sort of current global trade relationship between the US and other countries. Products will not be sold in dollars anymore, and it will probably lead to every single other countries doing the same to get out of debt, plus the debts are in dollars all over the world will also become zero.
It's the end of modern economy for about 10-15 years. Products in the US will become worthless, no more exports, riots will happen probably terrorism too, another country shall step up to be the flag of global trade, probably China or Russia, maybe Japan, your life will become very very bad.
And also maybe WW3, because the military has no funding left then the protection of nations shall depends on the development of massive weapons stock.
It's like the dark age. Clear?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@angelinimartini I am a civilized person, pal.
It's sad but this is how Democracy works.
Everybody is responsible for his and her own actions, and some actions are not tolerable, even if they're constituted by reasonable situation.
Life is not perfect, get over it. Majority of serial killers have very sympathetic childhood. But society can not tolerate what they do. No one is without sin, but some sin are not within the range of acceptable sin. If this is a perfect life, maybe, but it is not perfect.
You don't want a person to have a slightly uncomfortable childhood, which is sick, because despite you claiming "uncomfortableness", Americans still live in an overly privileged world compared to countless other countries.
So to avoid them this "slightly uncomfortable" childhood, you strip off their entire life, what has the potential to be full of wonders. That is a crime we civilized people can not tolerate. Not anymore.
This kind of attitude, and this kind of barbaric action is a massive problem.
Other countries, even less developed countries economically still have iron clad principle about ethics, that the killing of a kid is a abominable crime, yet Americans seem to celebrate it as if it is something more than just plain disgusting.
That is a problem. People can get out of poverty easily, and even if they're poor, they're not starving. At least my tax money was put to some good use. Getting out of a moral depravity culture, that is much more concerning.
During the time of the Civil War, despite there are problems within society, there was poverty, there was foreign conflict, there was other problems, but the people then decided that hey, the slavery thing is a problem because we can not tolerate such crime.
Well this is that sort of crime. Abortion is the killing of a child, a free, innocent child with endless potential, you can ignore it because the size of an unborn baby carcass is usually not big enough to cause a spectacle. But is is much more heartbreaking than any image of any slave. Go search it up. They have a head, a heart, a torso, 4 limb, they have their own DNA, soon their own voice, and maybe they soon will have a "soul"
So I suggest you get on board with the train of actual progress here.
1
-
1
-
@angelinimartini A born baby is also not viable on it's own, without somebody taking care of him or her, the baby will die. Does a baby that require special support to live consider worthless because it can't live on his own? People without insulin can not survive without sources of insulin that other people must provide, is their life means less to you?
What is this "considered viable" standard you're subjectively claiming to be absolute? No country in the world ever does that, only the barbaric US said that with impunity. In Asian countries tradition, they took the baby's age and add one more year, that's the year that the baby lived inside his or her mother womb. What a shocking statement claiming that it's not a baby at all because it can't "survive".
A fertilized embryo being able to survived 20 seconds, or a born baby being able to survive 1 day or so.
What is this nonsensical standard of viability? Lacking the skills of survival means your life is worthless?
Like I said, barbaric.
A fetus is an undeveloped human being, still a human being. So is a baby, if you don't take care of born baby, he or she will die. Babies with heart defects that require special support immediately after birth, are they "viable"?
Do you even think before you type your argument?
1
-
@angelinimartini Oh, I worked in a children home. That's called my home. Most people like you never had a child so you don't know how sick your action is.
Whatever you volunteer your time for, it's an insignificant thing compared to what you're doing. If you care about people, go down to a local abortion clinic and see the "remains" of the baby, does it look like a human body? 4 limbs, a torso, a head.
The US is the only barbaric country that not only legalize it but you glorify it. As if it is something more than a disgusting act. The Republic of China had to legalize abortion to control their population. And even then, the act itself, if you announced it proudly in the middle of the street, you will, "bring shame" to your family.
It's not just the act, it's how you consider that action. You don't care as much about children as you think you do. Countless orphaned kids, countless adopted kids grew to become people so important to your life that you can't even imagined. They are also humans with a different life experience than yours. How about you consider that?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@abhikahuja3773 She was chosen to represent the public, by definition, the public also vested her the right of using her own belief as a measure of the public if she deemed so. She abstained.
And Berkeley idiots, not being harassed isn't a right, but the first amendment purpose is not to let you say whatever every single kind of stupid and vial things possible. That's just abusing the law loopholes.
Consequences is one thing, extreme reaction based on moronic judgement, false ideology, no logic is not consequence, it's stupidity. It's immoral, unless you're saying immoral and stupidity is okay just because it's protected by the law? Go back to school, if you're going to Berkeley to learn social sciences, switch now while you still can, at least think a bit.
1
-
1
-
@UC0Rl7bQFO7OLSTZUGgtOuUg And there, done, your logic crumbled right there. If you have the right to say anything like your previous argument in how the students can react to her Christian belief just because they want to, it hurts her the same way somebody feel sad about being "harassed" sexually.
Now is that their fault for feeling bad or is the people's fault for speaking legally, in any sort logic, if sexually harassment is wrong, then the extreme action of people insulting her without reasons is also very wrong.
Not to say that any criticism or sexually oriented comment is wrong, no that's not how it works, if a person can justify their comments with logic and sensible reasons then it is justified, that's how law and order is built.
But like I said, before, it's wrong morally, not wrong legally, sexual harassment is a propaganda term, it's defined based on the subject aka the person being talked about, if the definition varies, any law relating to that is in some way very confusing and unclear, full of holes. You don't need to wait for consent before speaking, pal, any lawyer who defend in court will destroy that argument into pieces.
Berkeley is ranked very high by who? An unknown organization with unknown justification, unknown reasons? The sub prime mortgage bond was also ranked very high, they caused a global economy crisis.
Like I said before, judge things using your mind, otherwise you're gambling using your perception of the world.
Berkeley student isn't smart, they're highly skilled, anybody above average can do that with the right amount of training, most students from Asia will destroy you in computer science, math, physics, anything academically related. The only exception is that you're located in America, full of resources.
Here's the simple truth, science-wise, computer science, math, anything relating to calculations and equations, Berkeley might be the top, even though it is not clear what is the top because the result of alumnis are due to the alumnis themselves, not the school.,
Social science-wise, Berkeley is a hell hole, full of idiots who know nothing except their own opinion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bob-hi2xh Wow, you don't know math, do you?
Kid, oil's not gonna go anywhere, if Mexico won't buy, other countries will, the number of oil exported and its value will stay the same.
But jobs by manufacturing, is being taken from Mexico, and those jobs brings us benefits. Potato head kid keeps pretending to know what he doesn't know, you're just embarrassing yourself, Oil= all money? Dumb kid tricked by propaganda news right there.
1
-
@Bob-hi2xh Wow, you're just making things up as you go, kid. We never did anything to Mexican oil industry, they did it on their own, so yeah, kid. They make money in oil by themselves, we took their manufacturing jobs, those two areas overlapped in your delusional bubble or what, because they're separate in reality, that's some knowledge.
Pal, we don't export that much to Mexico, idiot, and they can buy tractors, trucks from Chinese, they can buy from Russia, it'll be more expensive because those places need to ship their products half way around the world, and those are machinery, so even though they can do it, which will be illogical they haven't done it yet due to the principle of doing what benefits self the most. So yeah, logic stands against you, stats stand against you, everything stands against you because you made your theory up with nothing to support. So I suggest getting out of the bubble and get a job. If you're a troll, you'll have better chance at a McDonald's ad, small time troll
1
-
1
-
@josephk1342 Well, plenty, use your brain ,kid. Can't just make things up, illegals with no document, no background from countries filled with cocaine, heroin, gang violence you can take your chance, smart people won't. And even if they have no connection to any organization, they're still breaking the law, everything, facts, logic, stats stand against you, go back to school, small time troll
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bob-hi2xh 1.4 billion, kid, 1.4 billion, that's less than an Air Force One, yeah, really nice job proving my point.
They don't buy helicopters, fine, there's little place with way much more money called Japan, and EU. You're just desperate, aren't you?
Not only that, Moscow can not build military planes in Mexico, stop making up sources, that would be a direct attack on America's security. So yeah, go to a McDonald's ad, small time troll.
1
-
@Bob-hi2xh Again, you're making things up, pal. Mexico export industrial products made by American companies, and if you're worried that you can't have tequila, I suggest switching to scotch. We don't need Mexico, Mexico need us, Russia wants to get involved military wise here, we're gonna take it to extreme measures such as Russia did with Georgia and Ukraine. It's called common sense, stop making trash argument based the presumption that everybody is as stupid as you.
They're gonna start making deals with "Russia", well we're gonna start punishing them, stop considering the two nation as equal, we're not, not in the slightest, they're not a big partner, kid. We're gladly to kick them out and replace them with the money coming from boosting our own economy, it's called math, learn some. Stop making up facts, pathetic, small time troll.
1
-
1
-
@replicated Nobody can diagnosed those kind of things, pal.
"mental disorder" is the most vague kind of "diagnosis" there is.
Just because he views reality differently than you are doesn't mean he's crazy, it means he's different from you. And the achievements he had achieved, seemingly you who are the unremarkable average person, which is worse?
Like I pointed out, get out of your bubble.
You can't even define what anti-semitism is. Listen to what he said, it's not about their religion, it's not about their belief, it's about how majority of people in power in business are Jewish, and they are doing everything to seize more control, which is the same as every other culture that has power, most specifically the Chinese.
1
-
@lunarmuse6079 Again with the name calling. You know what's the definition of calling names without actually listening? That's a partial definition of stupidity.
Keep it real homie, just because you don't like them doesn't mean they're crazy.
Here's what he is saying and you should be listening. The majority of people in power is trying to keep their power by putting the market, society into a status quo that benefits them. And this is typical for every culture, every race, everyone. However, the majority of them, in this case are accidentally Jewish, and understandably so, Jewish people have cultures that promote innovation, shard work, determination. But that doesn't mean that they can't be evil for wanting to keep less fortunate people in place.
Keep it real, homie. Some Jewish people can be bad people and criticizing those bad people doesn't make you an anti-semite.
1
-
1
-
@MrOzzification I do know something about the "mental illness" and that's it's the least specific kind of illness.
People are different, people get upset, people may have breakdowns, but that's a part of who they are.
You ignorant self proclaim that just because they might have these problems, they need your drugs which do affect their minds, don't kid yourself and whatever they say that you don't like are because they're having a condition.
That's an arrogant, ignorant, sick point of view.
Show some respect, homie.
Just because they say something you don't like, doesn't mean they're crazy. And just because they have mood swings doesn't mean they're crazy as well.
The validity of what he says, regarding Jewish big business owners now is undeniable. Those guys are real and they are trying to control their market by manipulating the public.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sylvertaco What voters? By that logic of mob rule then should 50,1% of the population don't have to do anything and just vote for 99% tax on the people who does things?
Democracies like that can only work in a perfect society where everybody works the same, contribute the same, DESERVE the same.
There's a thing called ethic, study pal, the current situation is already heavily unfair, somehow the top 1% is paying for 40% of the country, they're taking a loss, it's basically forced slavery, but they have no choice, without them, the country will fail.
But look yourself in the mirror and ask, is it stealing, because it obviously is.
The rich are sacrificing themselves and the ungrateful brats are keep going, it's called immoral, stupidity.
Voting doesn't decide ethics, in this case, the ethics are so clear, but people are just looking away.
An example, why don't you, in your community, pay out 27 times the fees of others?
1
-
1
-
@Sylvertaco
again, pal, you're living in a bubble again, they're not students anymore, legally they drink, they waste money, they waste time. If a person over 18 drunk driving and kill somebody, he'll go to jail. So unless you want to push the age to maybe 25, then your vision is totally crazy.
Groups pushing student loans are called governments, the loans aren't bad, the point is that the kid wasted the loans, you wasted money then it's the fault of the person who lend you money? Think a bit.
Self made individuals are from real life, moron, wants a clue? Look at the rise of millionaires. Idiot.
And the argument of stupidity, again, it's false, pal, even with the correct information, the stupid people can't make decisions, want a clue? They're called the left, when a person looses an argument with all the facts given to them beforehand, it's because they believe in a distorted version of the truth, which makes them stupid. For example you, I just pointed it out.
People working in major tech companies,
Pal, don't blame others just because you're pathetic, it's called ethics, study.
Restrictions put on choices? So you're saying that mature people can't take loans anymore? Or you're saying that student loans need to have guaranteed asset, which is the old ways which the liberals promising free money for all removed and replaced with this current broken system?
If you don't have a single argument, pal, it's better to stay quiet. You're just nitpicking pieces and ignore parts that you were destroyed.
1
-
@Sylvertaco
pal, are you a troll?
Like I said, stop nitpicking parts of the argument, you've been destroyed, even the nitpick is horrible.
Push the age to 25 means the age of taking responsibility to your action, pal, people under 18 aren't considered adults, but people are above 18, taking loans and such needs to have responsibility. Stop trolling around.
The people giving out loans, as I pointed out, are liberals. They want free money, no guaranteed asset, it's fraudulent, but they still do it. So either you admit that the policy is wrong, therefore crumbling your own argument of backing up massive governmental action on the public funding, or crumbling your own argument of how people are not stupid. So either way, you lose, nice try.
Promoting self made individuals aren't idealistic, if you had went to school, the would've taught you that, that's why people go yo school, pal.
I just gave you the argument and you ignored it and pretend like no argument, pal, if you're a troll, I suggest going to a macdonalds ad, not here.
Go back to school, small time troll, you have no argument, you ignore facts when given to you because it burst your little bubble, go back to school, pathetic troll.
When you've been destroyed, don't pretend that you're winning, it's not gonna work. Pathetic.
1
-
@Sylvertaco Okay, you troll, like I said, don't pretend as such you're winning when you've been destroyed.
The first obvious nitpick you make is when asserting that "people" are not stupid, I made the point of people being stupid to debunked your assumption of mob ruling will never go bad, given the example of how student loans are going down because people are making mistakes one their own.
You claiming that because they're "students" despite them all being over 18 then it's not their fault but the fault of people who gives the loan.
This argument of yours contradict the initial reply of saying that policies giving out taxpayers money are made due to the voting so it's never wrong. Who do you think give out the loans, kid?
Government gives out student loans, it's not their money to give out, the policy is reckless, but it's made due to voting. So is the policy wrong or correct?
You say that people giving out loans needs to take responsibility because students are stupid, while the same time saying that policies of giving out the loans will never go bad because people aren't stupid. Read, kid. Yeah, it's not actually nitpicking, it's just stupid argument.
Banks don't give out student loans, kid, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3QSHVNDlaM
Here, nice try. Too much reality for you?
And another nitpicking you did was on the sentence: "Promoting self made individuals aren't idealistic, if you had went to school, they would've taught you that"
Your assumption that this sentence means everything being taught in school is correct is nitpicking, it's also stupid interpretation, self made individuals are good examples happen to be taught in school, it doesn't mean everything taught in school are great.
Clear, kid?
We can keep doing this where I destroyed your arguments and you keep pretending that you've destroyed mine, despite it's obviously not because you don't even know that student loans aren't given out by the banks, so,
If you want to troll, go to a MacDonald's ad.
1
-
@Sylvertaco Nice try, kid, you can't just type long sentence to save your ass, just pathetic.
Policies giving away money is what the majority wants, but then you also say that the policy is wrong, so despite knowing that it's wrong, your argument for it is mob rule majority.
The basic is that you don't have any point of argument. What are you arguing for kid?
And banks can not give out student loans, your Google search skill is pathetic, I just gave you a clip of how large banks confirm that they don't do students loans. The majority of those loans are by policies giving away free money, by the government, you moron. That's what majority wants , and the policy is just wrong.
So your argument is the policy is wrong but that's what the majority mob wants and that's okay?
Go back to school, little troll.
You don't have any logic, you don't have a point to argue for it's just nitpicking, go back to school, little troll.
What Google search shows that. The overwhelming majority of student loans are made by any factors other than the government? Give a link, pathetic moron. You can't even do a simple search, that's not stupidity?
1
-
@williamr9833 It's very easy for everyone to create a bunch of things that are absolutely wrong, buddy. They actually need to create stuff that are correct, they're assisting with people who are creating correct stuff, but that's not the same thing. An advance machine is assisting people in manufacturing high technology products but that machine itself can't function without human input. Research hypothesis regarding social science is absolutely meaningless, especially if it's not even backed by a realistic methodology.
You're confusing being able to do one tiny part of the whole venture, not even doing it well with being able to do the entire thing, those two are not same thing.
Furthermore, that whole exponential argument you is based on nothing, you're guessing using wishful thinking, there's no clear formula or mathematical principle relating relationship between any specific characteristics of any algorithm with the computing hardware with the actual performance. Please go study real science, what's you're doing is making an observed guess on stuff you don't understand whatsoever, like a speculator in the stock market thinking how because a stock is going up, it will never go down.
Please be more sophisticated, that's now how science works. Even the people who are researching the thing has no idea what it's going to do next or whether there will be a significant improvement or not, they just take the money given to them to do certain "experiments" and see what's going to hapeen, please distinguish between that, which is actual research, filled with uncertainties and specific details with your version of make belief. HUGE DIFFERENCE.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, so this is where liberals turn to to cry their ass out. Here, idiots.
When the guy proposed giving people free money to "start" a business, he basically proposed the same thing Bill Clinton proposed which led to the 2008 financial crisis, giving people's money that they don't have the intention or the ability to repay.
Not all people's going to use the money to "go to school", a large amount of them will use it to get a drink. Because they're incapable of doing what smarter people is doing. Here, the people like Yang, who lives in the bubble of Silicon Valley doesn't understand, like how Mark Zuckerberg can't defy hate speech, the average worker doesn't care for "innovation", "creation" and "revolution". That's why they're still buying Iphones. Clear?
Any idiots who have a difficulty understanding could leave a reply, I'll gladly explain it to you. Oh, and Mr.Yang went on a morning show, people don't watch Fox News in the morning, he'll be destroyed at prime time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How desperate are you, pal?
Here's a clue, the technology behind it is called blockchain, which has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin.
Another guy can create another coin, that has the exact same function and is distributed accordingly. No government in the world, or any set of nations in the world will accept a trading instrument where the majority of it is heavily focused in one country. You Americans are delusional, try to keep it real.
How much did you put in the game and how much you've lost? Get out while you can, pal.
Your same argument is applied to countless websites during the tech bubble and of course, it all failed. It's still in it's infancy,..., it is the future,.... All hype, no results, no value.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Congratulation, you have a useless degree.
The point isn't with the debt, it's with the stupid people that can't pay the debt. It's called responsibility, own it, you're not in a crisis, except for the one you put yourself in.
The average loan is 37000, if you have a normal job, maybe at Amazon, you get 29000 a year, plus the interest, if you don't spend anything because you're in debt and you shouldn't be spending much, it's called logic, you can pay it off in 2 years, saying you're living with your parents, they've been raising you for 18 years, how about asking them to expand it for 20 years, saying that you don't ask for the parent's money to go to college, and all the part time job you can get in college.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PCVP4729 They filled a small stage with a bunch of people, yeah, that's paying attention to formation.
It's also there to make the crowd effect, which in fact lowers the requirements of a in sync choreography.
Popping, vibration, locking, you're just naming random popular style of dancing, that is not an argument, it's a fan excuse.
The reason people do one style their entire life is because that one style alone is difficult enough to master.
Your example of mixing styles. you missed a few stuff, they mixed it badly.
It's neither full hip hop or contemporary or is it at the level to be considered good hip hop or contemporary, it's a gimmick.
In Wolf they formed a tree, yeah, that might looks contemporary but come on, it's shallow as it can get and really? Black Swan? you called that contemporary dancing? That is pure insult.
Dancing is one thing, pretending to be dancing and hiding behind the excuse of not doing something straight to dilute the quality of it is another stuff.
Break dancing is very different from jazz hands, like how the original dancing in the 2000s came from the origin of pop choreography in the 1990s, very much technical and follows certain discipline.
And current kind of dancing, where they wave their arms around and delusional fans consider it "modern" and "artistic"
Distinguish the two. Contemporary dancing is not that easy to be easily mixed into pop songs. That is a massive insult.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ProperSlic No, why don't you look at the actual facts, idiot. We don't give people house they can't afford, they claim that they can pay and afford those houses, yet they lied. That's what most people do, incapable of doing anything useful despite of the best conditions. You have a house, no more rent, what do you have to worry about? Yet you can't pay the mortgage?
Your idea is giving people free money? Just because those aren't loans doesn't mean it's not a stupid thing giving free things to the people that will never repay it.
It wasn't inflation that led to the housing bubble, learn actual economics, it was stupidity of the bank to put trust in human's competency. Guess what, most people are incompetent, seeing how you people are asking for free money.
Why don't you go get a job, that's the right way to earn money. Pathetic! Maybe go get a degree at Economics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@netgiant2592 Yeah, nice try, kid, none of those research are even finished yet you claim those are results. Pathetic!
You see Finland, that's a failing, Canada, spending money for nothing. Stop making up lies.
12K is the poverty line, people won't do nothing, THEY'LL JUST BE DOING LESS THAN WHAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING, learn some math. If you can't prosper in America, it's likely that you're incapable of doing it, stop drinking, buy a book, study!
The whole flaw in Yang policy is that it steals from people and then ignore how the money stolen gonna be spent. You hope they will spend it well?
Yeah, use that hope in business, we'll see how you bankrupt.
Go back to school, idiot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh, the failed dude. Pretty pathetic guy, guessed that his campaign based on homosexuality card didn't pander out to the voters.
Pretty dumb guy, no solid plan, and of course, a puppet for the left.
They accuse Trump of something with no proof, he denies it, dummy lefty keep pretending as if it's a fact. What an idiot. At Least Trump Republican is actually a Republican, small government, John McCain before he was a Republican, he was a politician, pretty much like dummy Pete. Bunch of hypocrites.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sphere723 That's not how math works, darling, a smaller percentage of a bigger vote total means much more votes.
Hypothetically, if a Democratic candidates need 100000 more votes to win, the 1.2% difference compared to Clinton in Philadelphia doesn't mean anything, because Biden will get 81.2% of a bigger total votes, this year, the vote counts in Philadelphia rise to an extra 100000 votes, Trump gain of 18% of that, it is just an 18000 votes, but Biden gaining the extra 82% of that is 82000 votes.
When you increase the total sum by a lot , a less percentage means much more votes.
They did a terrible job rigging the election, they got caught.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@droopsmoop No, that impeachment inquiry is illegal, it follows no procedure, by that statement itself, a SCIF here is used for nothing valid, so it doesn't compromise anything except the Democrats sick agenda of stealing an election.
When somebody commit an unlawful act inside a SCIF, it's no longer a SCIF, it's a criminal house.
If somebody take hotages inside the oval office, pretty sure that they can storm the office.
The Democrats are leading an unlawful process, that dangers national security more than filming that unlawful process.
Get that, pal?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@darrencommanda7736 Shockingly, your belief are just your opinion based on your belief, it's not rooted in any widely accepted standards.
My thoughts and a lot of other people thoughts on a whole is you are very ignorant with what you're talking about, intentionally ignoring information and taking on wild assumptions to pad up your delusional belief, which is detached from reality.
Snyder made a realistic movie showing the dark nature of humanity and somehow you have a problem with it, you may disregard real life but that means there's rather a problem with you.
And with the whole nonsensical video of that "nerd" dude, it's a meaningless video, even the montage he used in his video are out of context. He uses the "moment" cut out from a clip that literally has voice over in it to point out how Snyder are creating "meaningless moments", no those moments have meanings, you're intentionally ignoring a major part of it.
And the whole idiocy regarding you have to slowly explain something to the audience on one set? Why does that even matter? People focuses on the characters, not the location those characters are in. Snyder built the story around characters and their emotions, sorry if you have a "location - fetish" but this isn't a sitcom.
If those are the best critique of a movie, no wonder that guy's unemployed as a movie maker, those are useless critique that applies to himself and nobody else. The audiences aren't that dumb for you to jam the scenes into one location in order for them to follow, that's not a critique, it's an opinion.
It's like saying you like the color red but the artist is using the color blue, a childish comment.
Batman v Superman doesn't run for 2 and a half hour, it run for 3 hours, the guy who made that video can't even bother to see the correct version of the movie.
Maybe you should start by seeing the correct version, pal.
1
-
@darrencommanda7736 Everything that video tried to say is factually wrong, because the guy who made the video can't even bother to see the correct version of the movie.
You need to see the correct version, darling.
In the fight scene, Superman tried to explain, when he's about to explain, Batman hit him with traps that was laid there before, that's why they need to fight it out, and one side can only explain after the other side is subdued. Imagine trying to talk to a person that's trying to kill you, it won't go down smoothly. This is why you need to watch the correct movie, pal, everything you said is factually wrong.
His universe is not derailed at all, kid, again. That Snyderverse restoration is the most incredible achievement in Hollywood History, something will never happen with the fans of Reeves or Whedon, or like any generic directors who sold their souls to Disney, their work are as average and uninfluential as it can be.
You claim Snyder has no substance, we claim every other movies churned out by the opposition, for example Joss Whedon has no substance, those movies have shallow substances, really poorly written material trying to be padded off as complicated thing, where it barely scratches the surface of any meaningful morality question, while Snyder work dwells right in there right in the first movie called Man of Steel.
What would happen if a person is put onto an unwinnable situation? That happens rather too often in real life, that's the difficult question. When in Marvel movies or even the Batman, somehow even they tried to portraits the hero as losing, the hero has already won, it's ridiculous.
The key difference is that we're committed enough to Snyder work and had made his vision came true, something that you idiots will never get, why? Because unfortunately for you, your level of attachment to those work are as shallow as the content of those work itself, very average. You don't understand those work, because there's nothing there to understand, you will be attached to 20 movies recycling the same idea under different name, shallow as it can be, you probably already have.
So about the level of influence of each work, Snyder work might have a bit fewer fans, but quality of each fans outclass you average fans by a gigantic margin.
First step in an argument, kid, do not get the wrong material. Maybe you should start by watching the correct version first, and start watching analysis video of the people who did watch the correct version.
1
-
@darrencommanda7736 That is adorable of you thinking that Reeves is a great director, just plain adorable. Cinema runtime has been cut down even for James Cameron, so stop with the nonsense of length time, studio just wisen up, has nothing to do with the director's credentials.
Your version of good film is just too low for us sane people to accept. You haven't seen those things before showcases your lack of knowledge of film in general. There's nothing exceptional about Reeves batman movie, he took the motive of a detective film and then apply to whatever characters you can jam in there that does detective work, nothing original.
Batman is not about doing "detective" thing, it's a minor component of batman, not the entire thing.
This is a character that shapes about 70 years of America pop culture, show some respect.
What you consider to be good or bad film is your subjective opinions, nobody really cares. But don't try to pass it off as anything more than a subjective opinion, it's not shared by anybody, and even if it is shared, it's a rather shallow judgement, you don't commit to the content that you're talking about. So it makes your comment sort of worthless, like showing a movie to a 4 year-old. The kid can very much have an opinion whether the kid like or hate it, and the opinion is just as valid, the difference is in the level of commitment, or the depth of the judgement.
Don't take such pride on average qualities and generic perspective, pal. It's not something to be proud of, really.
1
-
@darrencommanda7736 Reeves didn't make Batman the way Batman is written or interpreted by the writers throughout the last 70 years. So yeah, show some little respect, pal.
No, the masses don't agree, even if they agree, those "masses" opinion are extremely shallow because they're trivial opinions, like I pointed out before, they don't commit.
It is an above average movie of course, it's just not up to par with any other of notable ones.
I'm not dumb enough to gamble my life on studying cinema, that's usually what idiots choose to do. People like you who don't really understand anything but you try to pass it off as if you do. Imagine learning how to write a book before you can understand the book, that's the most ridiculous thing ever.
There are measurements of support, of commitment of the viewers, of the "impact" of something onto the mass, these can be seen, observed through the eyes, and at those measurements, "The Batman" just don't live up to par.
Don't flatter yourself on mediocrity, darling, it's just pitiful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, this grifting channel is utterly disgusting. He's intentionally uses clickbait title to skew the reality of academia and the situation being discussed in the process. A person of such caliber and that position is nearly never the main author of any of these papers, they're not responsible for collecting, handling, analyzing the data or writing the paper, they're an overall supervisor, manager and therefore their name is last.
If a technician at a company commits fraud and bad work ethics in delivering a product, the overwhelming majority of the fault lies with the technician, not the CEO of that company.
And furthermore, this guy have absolutely no understanding of the verification process of fraud. You can't just put out a serious claim of allegation and then pretend as the word of an unknown person, probably unqualified on a not qualified website as proof.
What do you mean exact replication? Did you count the pixels that are stored inside the images via somekind of software, where's that analysis of the stored photo? Your eye finding is not good enough. People at that scale of a Nobel Laureate doesn't have time to deal with nonsensical untrustworthy crude allegation, if you want to prove that something is wrong, do a proper analysis by software, homie.
And even more than that, Sudhof published nearly 400 papers in his entire career, you found 35 allegations, allegations, btw, and one case of proven fraud that's not even comitted by him. This is not a scandal, this is low life YouTube grifting technique.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@baybell7991 Poor, kid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7XZmugtLv4
Here
Coronavirus is not fake news, but when Donald Trump said it was going away in April, it's under the condition that the case in the US remain 12, and there's travel ban on China from European countries, they did not.
They followed CNN stupid advice of letting people from China in.
China has ban all domestic travel from Wuhan, but somehow they let people from Wuhan travel to anywhere in the world.
It is fake news that the death toll 80,000 is the worst it can get.
If we had followed CNN stupid advice of not banning travel from China, it would be like a few hundreds of thousands.
And Donald Trump is evading tax, just like how Clinton evaded all the deleted e-mails.
If you treat one candidate one way, it's fair that the other candidate gets treat that exact same way. Clear, kid?
1
-
@AnaisWolf Oh, poor, kid. You quote a Google search and a pathetic lie.
Kid, if it's based on the Mueller report, there's a thing called the report itself you can read.
Funny thing, setting up a meeting is not the same as colluding. Should go back to school, they'll teach you that there.
And also, in the report itself, there's one line you need to read.
No collusion with Russia.
And instead of quoting a sketchy, pathetic organization that has no credibility.
Here is the document from the American Bar Association, and it's not "bar" as in a pub, kid.
https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right now, in all those 4 regions, Ukraine control about 10% of the territory, and about 3% of population.
So no, he's not delusional, those parts are lost.
Those 4 parts are of Russia and there's nothing you can do about it, right now they're taking things easy because you kids are playing in small towns the size of Vernal, Utah. Another nameless city nobody cares for.
Try approaching the big leagues, the city of Donetsk in Donetsk, Luhansk in Luhansk, Mariupol in Donetsk. Watch Japan in 1945, pretty clear history lesson of what happened when you attack the territory of a nuclear superpower.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Go ahead, you can not by the way. Any law banning gun possession altogether is already Unconstitutional.
The Texas law ban abortion first, and then allows for the citizens to sue the criminal.
Trying to do the same with guns will be just sad, because there isn't enough money around covering for lawsuits like that, suing every citizen who owns a gun? And again, unlike abortion, guns are actually defended within the Constitution, so it will be a matter of time before a case reaches the Supreme Court, and you, like everything California touches, it goes to shit.
California is way too broke and way too incompetent for that law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Quoting from Biden document.
"Federal funding to create a civilian corps of unarmed first responders such as social workers, EMTs, and trained mental health professionals, who can handle nonviolent emergencies including order maintenance violations, mental health emergencies, and low-level conflicts outside the criminal justice system, freeing police officers to concentrate on the most serious crimes. Fund initiatives to partner mental health professionals, substance use disorder experts, social workers, and disability advocates with police departments to respond to calls with police officers to better de-escalate interactions with citizens and when appropriate, to divert individuals to the social services they need."
The nonsense here is in the "creation of a civilian corps of unarmed first responders".
This is defunding or abolishing the police because it replaces the police with these "first responders".
This is a crazy idea because the police isn't there to treat the substance abuse person, the police is there to protect the people whom the substance abuse person is harming.
The idea of replacing policemen, who protects civilians, with the people focused on treating the insane people, is defunding the police.
You can call a social workers, but oh, no, the substance user has a gun, what will they do? Say pretty please?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hey, idiot, if that's your case than every baby in Africa should be killed right? You're showing no understanding at all of moral reasons, laws, or actual knowledge of the field. Information Technology? One very important tip relating to actual intelligent arguing, do not bring up nonsense that isn't related to the point, for example, you're showing your very average degree to back up your talking point, which isn't much to begin with.
If you're too confused about how things work if I explain in a normal way, here's a more direct way. Laws are not perfect, the Constitution isn't perfect, the Constitution isn't a set of absolute rules, it's a relative set of laws that our founding father tried to make it as close as possible to embodying our values and codes. So unless you can take a direct sentence denying something in the Constitution like the first amendment, for example: "Congress shall make no law abridging the right to freedom of speech", all the rest that isn't in the constitution is for the people at different times to decide, and the limit to that decision is based on what kind of arguments you can give to support your understanding, and currently, now pal. You can't.
A little tip, you actually worked in I.T, you would have known that Wikipedia is the worst example someone could get when quoting facts or information. Journalist do not use Wikipedia as source. Politicians can't use Wikipedia as grounds for election campaign, lawyers can't use Wikipedia for proof. So there, that's the example, kid, maybe you're 50, but the amount of knowledge that you posses in this field is not that much more than what a 5th grader posses, considering how you're just typing nonsense things that you could find on the internet, I've concluded that it's a decent assumption.
There are social well fare programs, how can you say that we're not supporting life when all things we're doing is helping the society, bringing back jobs so that parents could feed their kids, the current situation is bad for our people, no doubt. But that situation is due to economic passiveness and horrible programs that do not have any actual use. Obamacare, is that your proof for Democrats caring for life? Go back to college and get another degree.
Finally about the Supreme Court Delay, when a Justice is confirmed, he or she shall be on the bench for life until their retirement, which could last until they're death if they don't want to resign or retire before their deaths. So here's the actual argument, having one President nominating too many nominees into too many open seats is extremely dangerous because it will make our system possibly rigged. Because Presidents choose nominees based their preferences. And that's fine, to a degree. A minimal balance position needs to be retained on the Supreme Court, so a Presidents are usually able to choose 1-2 nominees in their terms. Unless it's an exceptional case. For example, if a Supreme Court Justice passed away at the middle of a President's Term, than the vacancy of the seat will be too long, therefore require special judgement, and they could appoint another nominee, but that nominee has to be considered neutral in order for the system to work. And Obama didn't respect that, therefore he tried to push for a far left judge at the end of his term, that is unacceptable. Okay, pal. Anybody who has studied law, if qualified, needs to realize that laws are not perfect, so the way we applied those laws needs to be based on context and how the law would affect the concerned. Try to think a bit. Judges shall not fined an extremely large amount of money to a company that accounts for an also extremely large number of employees. That's how you applied the law, If the reading itself is too confusing to you because you probably had no training involved reading, then I suggest watching a sitcom that has a lawyer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CeBePuH No, that's not correct, pal. Auto pilot is safer in routines, what if the routines are wrong? What if there's unforeseen circumstances?
If it crashes and when it crashes, who will take responsibility?
Do you think that people hired chauffeur because they think they're safers? No, kid, it's because of accountability.
If you cause an accident, the person behind the wheel is responsible.
So if auto pilot crashes on its own. It's you who are responsible, think about that.
Your point is flawed, because it misses the point.
If it can crash, then the responsibility belongs to someone. Who is that?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariaf.6601 Because it's totally detached from reality.
The Russian army that was sent in during the first wave of the operation, the army that was outnumbered 5 to 1 seemingly, that army managed to take nearly 20% of Ukraine territory. And with the recent mobilization within Russia itself, now Russian army is outnumbering the Ukrainians, and even worse, The Russian are at a defending position that they have been fortifying for nearly a year.
It's basic warfare math, the only side running out of troop is the Ukrainian, because all Ukrainian civilians are fleeing, and only the Ukrainian sides are launching offensives.
Launching offensives always cost more lives than defending position, especially launching a poorly equipped offensives. You need 3 times as much resources to launch an offense against an equal size defense, and Ukraine is running out of them. NATO countries do not have 24/7 arms production factories, unlike the ones that was put into work from the first day of the war in Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ralphbernhard1757 First off, kid, she did abstain, watch the video.
And next, separation of church and state means not letting values of the church to dictate the decision of the state. As in how you can't put in religion based laws and regulation. However, the state is also a organization based on the vote. If the people voted her even with her religious belief, like I said, she is vested the power to use her judgement, her belief as a representation of the people.
You need to study long and hard before talking nonsense, the right of liberty, in this case, hers is being infringed upon. You intentionally ignored that part or what?
Her religious view is protected by the same right, specifically the right of liberty. If she doesn't write any bill dictate her religious beliefs on anybody then she is fully capable of using the right of liberty to deem what she think is correct and represent the people who voted for her using that belief.
What kind of right is to dictate LGBT nonsense on people? Forcing views, agenda upon people like what the bill is doing, is actually violating the principles.
Separation of church and state isn't just with Christian, it's also with any crazy cult. You can't make up gender and "identity" and then force it upon other people.
Go back to school, pal, think a bit, do some research.
1
-
@ralphbernhard1757 First off, kid. She abstained, that's finished with whatever roles you can loosely interpret based on politics.
If the bill had passed, the first right being restricted is the right of liberty. Liberty of believing in what she believes and the inability to promote that belief. The bill says to "promote" LGBT nonsense, that's the first nonsense, you can't force people to promote something based on nothing.
There's a major difference between discrimination and simply deeming something invalid, kid. LGBT nonsense is fact, you can't just make up gender just because you feel like it.
No science in the world ever proved or studied into what those derogatory are, if a crazy cut himself and then claim that he is only attracted to people who are equally attracted into people who have scars? You would call him what? A "scar" something. Kid,
Moron, her right is the right of religious freedom, to believe whatever she wants to believe, LGBT nonsense have the same right, you can see them screaming it at people's face. But the bill infringe on the liberty of people who don't believe in LGBT nonsense. There is no bill promoting Christian Value.
Here's a clue, kid, you're a moron who has no knowledge of what you're talking about. My advice? Go back to school.
1
-
@ralphbernhard1757 Great, that's your concern, you have the right to call Christian crazy, they have the right to call LGBT crazy. That's your right of liberty.
What infringe it is the action of using government to promote any of the two. Clear?
Bake a cake thing was ruled in favor of the baker, the Baker sell cake, the gay people ask for gay cake, you can't force that.
If a person ask for gay gasoline, as in maybe gasoline that requires special procedures, they will be refused, too.
Learn the law, kid. And arguments are opinion supported with facts and logic.
That makes my argument valid and your argument trash. Clear?
Go back to school, you already lost.
1
-
@ralphbernhard1757 Who said that we're winning? We have to keep fighting with morons lile you, otherwise we will be defeated.
There are discrimination, and laws preventing them applies to all, but distinguish between law that protects you and abusing the law to attack people.
Like I said, logic that can't be penetrated. Crazy LGBT nonsense can believe whatever they believe, but they can't force people to promote it.
You can't force a tailor to make you a wedding suit specifically embroidered with gay promoting messaging if he doesn't want to. The same way you can't force people to report gay news just because you're gay. Idiot, get out of the bubble kid.
You think it's okay to be crazy, making up 40 genders based on feeling. I don't, act according to the law, and you're violating it by promoting your opinion using governmental act. Study, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GF-qb3uo Okay, so your argument is that they're not compelled to buy weapons from Boeing, Lockheed or Raytheon. But they just have to buy the type of weapons and arms among the kind in which Boeing, Lockheed and Raytheon are the market leaders already.
Buddy, not a great argument. The story is the same, so instead of 100% sure that expansion of NATO guarantees increase in arms dealing revenue, the odds are about 70% sure.
I mean what is even your argument here? You expand NATO to sell more weapons, whether you're responsible for 100% of the weapons or 70% or even 20% of the weapons, it doesn't make a difference to your motive. And no, we're not talking small fries as in small arms, buddy. These corporations deal with big armamaments, it's big money. So why don't you think of something bigger and way more expensive than a rifle?
It's like you intentionally not seeing the problem. You have a bunch of very powerful organization that has a direct incentive to start wars and sell more weapons. Out of all the possible kind of business, they're in the business of killing and threatening people, and those same businesses gives obscene amount of cash to politicians in order to fabricates and hype up more threats to create more weapons deal.
Come on, man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, either way he doesn't really care. If there is a war with Israel, fine. Israel will definitely lose, because it's not just Iran, it's Russia and China support, anything to weaken America is in their interest, and they don't have to conquer Israel, they just need to bleed the West so bad they the West basically implode. Iran is not asking for the death of Israel, at least not now, what they will not tolerate is an attack on 10 million Palestine civilians, mainly 3 millions in Gaza.
The West is checkmate, pal. The situation in Ukraine exposed them, and now all of injustices, illegal colonizing activities shall be erased from the planet. It started in Ukraine, it spreaded to Africa, and now even the Middle East shall face this new reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gdo3510 Again, that's not how it works.
FTX model, on paper, on the contracts that it gives out to people, describe a solid business model. And it is.
SBF lied to the investores, he lied to customers, he didn't do what he said he would've done. He stole their funds.
FTX original idea is an exchange patform, a really good one as well, and it's the same as Binance.
But SBF changed that model into something else.
Imagine this, Apple make great products, that's what they pitch people. And they did delivered to a degree great products, but then after Steve Jobs resigned, another guy comes on, pitching the same idea and then stole all of the money, is that the company's fault? Or is that the guy's fault.
The business model is good, it's working, Binance is getting money now. But the guy who runs the whole thing is a thief, distinguish the two.
The only problem is mislocating customer deposit. That's why they're bankrupted, had they left those funds alone, there's nothing that could have gone wrong because it's like a casino. As long as you can cover all the chip that is played on your floor by having a reserve, there's nothing that could go wrong, even if you gamble away your own money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dacali1636 That's not how that law works, little children.
Inciting what? Did he directly encourage the mob to break in the capitol?
Did he directly encourage them to kill anybody? Did he directly encourage or plan the systemic overthrowing of the government?
You see, inciting is a word, used as incite a specific action, not as inciting in general, or indirectly. Study real law.
Like I said, unlike you deranged people, the country doesn't work on triggered feelings.
Majority of the Senators do not have the authority to impeach a President, only a 2/3 super majority can, it sucks, heh. Constitutional law is just a bummer.
And even then, they do not have the authority to convict and sentence him to anything. They can only remove him off his position, which he no longer hold and can not be done. You see, there are 3 parts of the government, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. If he committed a federal crime, that must be prosecuted by the Executive of the Biden administration, what happened, all the power and nothing happened? The law prevent you from political persecution? Sad, huh? Spend more than just 20 minutes flipping over random triggered tweets shall do you much good.
You're not even in the US, and of course, the fact that you spent 20 minutes of research on one of the most impactful event of America history showcase how ignorant you are.
Because majority of what you managed to research is wrong, it's naive, it's laughable.
Educate yourself on facts, kid, not make believe facts. Study properly, that style of work can get you an A in gender study, not in life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Graybeard_ Yeah, that's not how it works, darling.
If you want a new right, you have to vote and then pass a new amendment. Your sick way of cheating the law is not acceptable anymore. It's over, deal with it.
Reagan changed, sad enough, he came to the right side too late and already caused a lot of damage to California, but he made up for that later. A much simpler explanation is that your fantasy of protection for abortion, is not in the Constitution. I don't really care what you want, but you can't just make something up and then force it upon society as if it's a law. It's not in the Constitution, there's no right that includes it, and people wrote the constitution didn't even know about such a thing, they kept banning abortion for the next 150 years. How about you get back to reality?
Your argument about the 2nd amendment is completely false, because that ignores the second part of that one sentence, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", it has never been interpreted that one has to be in a militia to keep a weapon, that's just stupid.
Free states, not free United States, that amendment limits the federal government from infringing the right of the individual states citizens to keep weapons. Your sad argument was dismantled is Columbia v Heller.
And no, people can't buy AK-47 anymore, those are illegal. Weapons with massive destruction capabilities are not protected by the 2nd amendment. AR-15 shoots one bullet at a time, it's a hand gun, just bigger.
Go study real law, kid. Your make belief law standard might work in California, where the lunatics reside, but it's unacceptable to the sane people of this country.
1
-
1
-
@Graybeard_ Oh, that's just adorable.
I don't know where you get the most people nonsense, because if you excluded California into it's separate state, the other 49 doesn't share that wish one bit. And you know, we don't function as one entity, there are separate states. So maybe you and your fantasy majority should go to California, you would love it there. Junkie everywhere.
Majority of the people in the other 49 states do not support killing of babies. Yes they want mass shooting to stop, but not by banning guns.
Most of the civilized world do not allow for murdering of babies, kid. Even in India and China where there are the most abortion, they disgust such actions, therefore actresses who did it had to hide it.
Do not confuse of what you tell yourself inside your heads with reality, little kid.
The lunatics in California does not represent this country, party's over, even if you try to deny it.
If you try to enact the make belief majority rule at places where sane people don't allow it, you'll probably enjoy up to 5 years in jail, so you're welcome to try.
Go back to California, kid, junkies aren't welcome elsewhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LaMortEtLamour What did Bill Gates stole?
Specific name, kid?
Anything? What was thing that existed before Gates?
If providing an OS is that easy, why was it the breakthrough?
Pal, there were countless people that can build a hardware computer, frankly, it's harder building an airplane than to build a computer.
Because the things required in an air plane is much more than in a computer, it's the software, the utility of if that makes it hard to build.
So yeah, Bill Gates contributed nothing except the most valuable part.
And the guy from Apple contributed a concept of computer designing that nobody thought of before and it is used until now.
Electrons were there after Thompson discovered it, but it is the X-ray application, as well as multiple other electron application afterwards that makes the discover so important.
1
-
@johnj8639 What advancement, pal?
Their biggest companies by revenue are still traditional industries. Oil refining is not advancement because the technology they used was given to them but the American.
Some of the largest? What does that mean? Which one? The largest are Toyota, Hyundai, Honda, Mercedes-Benz.
None of them are of socialist economies.
So you're lying about the results here.
The country with the biggest income disparity is China, pal, and they're no where near collapsing, the income disparity there is accompanied by a population of common sense, knowing that if you don't make anything, you don't get to earn anything.
So the nonsense of socialist economy making progress, that is a massive lie.
The Scandinavian countries are parasitic countries, that live off American achievement, Neste of Finland for an example, and they don't have any military technology, nice try.
They would be part of the Reich if if it hadn't been for America.
Why don't you get back to reality and stop passing out easily debunked lies?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnj8639 Oh really, what are those reasons about student debts?
idiots taking out loans that they can't pay, huh? Wonder what you call that if not idiots? Are they genius? Are you also going to ignore that overwhelming majority of those loans are not invested in anything capable of making a profit?
Taking a loan to be a teacher is a stupid act, because being a teacher doesn't pay back the loans.
Education that teaches you useless stuff, are useless. There are a few classes on mud pie making down at the pig farm, people spending 4 years in those classes are what? Genius?
You lie again with the equity argument, Google had much less equity than Yahoo, so was Facebook, you continued to ignore facts and live in a fantasy. So I suggest you wake up, pal. This is not 1932, it's 2020.
Minimum wages are the things that made inequality this bad. How can you claim to be reducing inequality if you're denying jobs to the people whom capabilities don't match the minimum wages?
Everything you have listed are big fantasies, that are not viable in the US, because as I have pointed out, a bunch of idiots live there. 47% don't pay a dime in taxes. Payroll taxes aren't taxes, they'll get it back much more in Medicare.
Countries with the smallest inequality, unfortunately, are also parasitic countries. You think Sweden got here by themselves? If you look at their companies, the biggest ones are monopolies.
And the funny thing, they enslave those monopolies to give out free stuff to the lower people. But the bad thing here, is that year after year, they create nothing, year after year, living off what is already there and brings in zero innovation. Because as I've pointed out, even with so much free equity, they still contributed nothing.
The nonsense of innovation not coming off of inequality, it has been debunked.
Equality in opportunities means inequality in outcomes, because certain individuals are that special. This is not a theory, it is a fact. And the biggest leverage to success is to able to earn what you made.
How come the inequality level so low but the innovation is next to zero despite the biggest companies there are not lacking in equity at all?
Your theory conflicts with reality, there is a word for that. Wrong.
1
-
@johnj8639
Really, most students will pay back their student loans?
How can it be a crisis if most people will payback their loans?
And if most you mean only 51%, that other 49% is a small amount. Learn some actual math. 49% is still a lot, not a majority, but a lot.
Investment? Taking a degree in gender study is an investment surely, investment to failure.
Pal, I don't know what bubble you're living in, but if the loans being taken out are actual solid investments, then there would be no crisis. But unfortunately, most of them are useless.
If you look at Harvard or Stanford major list, even at those schools, out of 60 possible majors, only 10 are viable.
A college degree in Film studies is pretty much useless because the chance of a normal individuals becoming a solid director to make real money is very small.
So again with the lies. You have done the math?
Which major are you in? If it's Engineering or any actual sciences, fine, you're not one of the dummies.
But if you think that there isn't a massive number of loans taken out to pursue moronic studies, then you probably are a dummy. Get back to reality and get out of the bubble.
Your monopoly argument is flawed because you can't seem to name a monopoly today.
What is the monopoly today if not the biggest company?
Or do you want make belief examples so that your absurd theory would sound good by default?
You are the dummy who don't know how economic works, here's simple clue.
If everything was sunny side up, they wouldn't have called it a crisis.
You have been destroyed on every part and shockingly, you can not give a counter argument except on my grammar.
That is called ignorance, pal.
You have been citing the nonsensical economic theories of the 1920s, complete ignoring the later half of the 20th century where those theories are destroyed.
I suggest reading Friedman and Sowell.
Get out of the bubble, pal.
And I have explained to you how those countries are parasites. Their biggest company are mostly monopolies living off the population, industries that are as old as it can be, banking and oil refining. There are no competition, no innovation, they live off military protection of the US, they barely allow any immigration. And the companies they own all uses American technology and American innovation that we allowed them to use.
The example is Neste, the biggest company of Finland by far, a parasitic oil refining company that lives off American oil refining technology, and Russian oil sources.
So, living without having to do much, it's quite parasitic. If America revoked all of it's technological transfer, those countries would become Russian district within a year, because only the Russian has alternate technology for them to live on.
Wake up, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@God Bless America Our space program is not far ahead at all, they stopped developing theirs.
But their achievement still puts them as technology powerhouse, and ahead of us in some ways, we has never been able to send anything to Venus surface, and they did it 50 years ago or such.
We lost to Vietnam, Vietnam was backed by the Soviets, what happened there?
And also, they didn't want to invade Ukraine, just Crimea, they still owns Crimea, don't listen to lies, pal, study. All those "backed up" by the US can't stop them from securing that strategic location within 4 years.
They're very dangerous and very smart, that's why make them an enemy is just pure stupidity. Especially if they're not harming us.
1
-
@God Bless America And if you get that landing man on the moon nonsense, pal, their intention was never to go the Moon.
Our program was made to showcase technological superior, but come on, it's the moon, what will you do once you get up there? Nothing, you come right back. The Russians at the first place explored space as a solution to communications network, and they did it, they are the only country that developed another global positioning system, GLONASS.
I think you need to get out from the bubble, if they're not dangerous, nobody would've cared. But they are very dangerous.
1
-
@God Bless America You're funny, kid, it was the race to go the moon, it's a useless race because it's the moon, what are you gonna do their? Drill for oil?
It's just a race to showcase power, and it's just purely ignorant to cling on to that. They sent a probe to Venus, meaning their technology in material endurance have far surpassed us.
Landing people on the moon is just about orbital transit, you can do that with a probe, but risking human lives along the way, not worth it. Nearly a dozen of American astronauts died during the tests. It's an achievement, but a foolish one to rely on.
1
-
@God Bless America No country actually care about mars, it's not that hard to land a rover there, the surface condition is not as harsh as Venus. Check it out, kid, Venus is much more difficult, Russia beat us on that.
And it's pronounced "satellites", and also, America has a system, Russia has their own system, so it's quite equal on that, nothing to gloat about.
And about hypersonic missiles, your argument is flawed, just because you do research doesn't mean you can achieve a breakthrough, it takes years, Russia developed it faster.
The point of hypersonic missile is that you can retaliate immediately without being stopped. Meaning you can not attack Russia because you have no way of avoiding their retaliation.
Russia can attack you because they have a defense system far better, learn some math, you troll.
Hypersonic missiles are weapons of defense, not attack.
Meaning if it's used for attacks, you will be destroyed and you can not stop it.
If you want to attack Russia, they might survive or not, but if Russia attacks you, you would be dead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wayneenterprise463 Nice lies, kid, no wars have been going on ever since 2011, stop making up wars, The entire military budget now is 700 billions, mostly to secure areas, you want to disband military? It will lead to WW3. Then your UBI won't mean much, think!
Lobbying isn't measured in trillions, learn some math.
Tax breaks create jobs and growth, which actually filled the tax, successful with Reagan and now Trump. And tax breaks are too all American people, don't be angry just because you don't pay taxes, therefore gained no benefits.
How about getting actual facts and stop typing lies? Idiot.
1
-
1
-
Yeah, that's not how it works, pal.
He specifically said in the interview that FTX US is maybe solvent, and he's no longer in charge of it.
FTX International is different. His explaination is that Alameda Research was doing trading on FTX platform, trading derivatives and options, and such they need to put up collateral that they did not have. And if Alameda can't put up collateral, supposedly FTX has to stop Alameda trading activities and "liquidate" the assets, which means they keep all the collateral put up by Alameda.
However, he said this did not happen due to lack of attention, that Alameda was able to kept trading on the platform despite not putting up enough collateral.
It's a bit different, but in this case, it's actually legal.
There are 2 scenario.
Scenario 1: FTX wired money to Alameda directly and let Alameda uses such money to trade elsewhere, that is illegal, and by Sam's claim, it did not happen
Scenario 2: Every "derivative trading", "leverage" on FTX platform uses other customer's funds in order to trade, and in order to do so, the ones who trade has to put up collateral. For example, if you want to trade ETH on FTX but you don't have ETH, FTX can loan you ETH of other customers if you put up collateral into FTX platform. This is legal and is in the terms of service.
What happened supposedly is that Alameda traded on FTX platform using legal loans that they collateralized with FTT tokens, which is perfectly legal token to put up as collateral by market cap. But when the FTT tokens fail, Alameda trading options got closed out, but FTX can no longer sell the collateral FTT tokens anymore. This is a perfectly legal scenario
In scenario 2, where does the money go? The money goes to the sides that were betting against Alameda. Not everybody loses money, money here is a fixed amount, other parties that bet against Alameda won big, you just didn't hear of them yet.
Like in 2008 Real estate bubble, where did the money go? The money went to the people who built those houses and sold them off easily for quick money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alenramic9436 That's not a strawman argument. I'm just writing a fact. Tesla did not invent electricity by the way.
Genius means showing extraordinary capability at some sort of things.
There are genius at science, in science, there are many fields, there are prodigy of maths, prodigy of physics, chemistry, computer science, even engineering.
There are genius in artistic fields, genius in music, paintings, writings, dancing, etc.
Writing has many subsets, writing stories, writing novels, writing musics, etc
If he's not top 5, he is at the very, very top. How do we judge this? The most common way is validation by his peer and by the public. Now you might follow this narcicistical view of something maybe genius just because you say so and you think everybody else point of view is worthless. But I think that's just sad.
The results he had achieved, that is the proof of his genius.
Maybe he didn't choose his words as accurate as possible. But he is definitely among those ranks. He is much closer to Shakespeare than you are to him, pal.
Show some respect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KriFreKil Yeah, that's not how it works, buddy. The Navy SEALS, like any other part of the military are filled with people doing a specific job, most of them are not really selected of their extreme intelligence, they have above average intelligence, maybe borderline good, it's highly unlikely that any of them are "extremely intelligent". The extremely intelligent types are of the intelligence analysts, you know the ones processing a lot of intelligent information.
And furthermore, this guy is definitely no where near the decision making machine, and even those guys are sometimes incredibly incompetent. For example, David Petraeus, who literally lost every single war he ever fought and resigned in disgrace for a sex scandal.
The history of the US intelligence agency for the last 40-50 years is a track record of failures and illegal activities. They think that oppressing journalists makes them look tough.
1
-
@KriFreKil Yeah, that's not how it works, buddy. The Navy SEALS, like any other part of the military are filled with people doing a specific job, most of them are not really selected for their extreme intelligence, they have significantly above average intelligence, maybe borderline good, it's highly unlikely that any of them are "extremely intelligent". The extremely intelligent types are of the intelligence analysts, you know the ones processing a lot of intelligent information.
And furthermore, this guy is definitely nowhere near the decision making machine, and even those guys are sometimes incredibly incompetent. For example, David Petraeus, who literally lost every single war he ever fought and then caught in a sex scandal.
The history of the US intelligence agency for the last 40-50 years is a track record of incompetence and illegal activities. They think that oppressing journalists makes them look tough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Cynna1065 Fine, do you have any prove that those people didn't vote? Where's your prove for that?
The source? Well, images of illegal immigrants fleeing from law enforcement, the existence of ICE itself is the evidence showing that those illegal aliens are committing crimes and do not wish to stop. Therefore they have the motive not supporting the people who are capturing them. And that's the motive. Where's the proof for that? Call the FBI and ask them how they narrow down their suspects.
This is a theory, very likable theory based on how nobody can disprove it, but half of the country is disallowing proving it.
You're just ignoring facts because you're short sighted, pal.
It's not my instinct, it's logic. Learn it. Kid.
You can't disprove it. We're prohibited from proving it due to the corrupt nature of the Democrats, disallowing voting registration requirements.
There, those are the facts. If you can't see, you're very blind.
You can't show and prove something that is hidden, kid. You know what it's called
Investigating, thinking, logic.
It's also how democracy was formed. Ideology that has never been seen before put into application due to logic.
There. Your version of show and prove is not much more than a show and tell of a third grader, can only be applied with very trivial stuff. If you want to argue, pal, I suggest learn how to think by using what you see, not just reciting what you see however it was given to you.
Pathetic!
1
-
@Cynna1065
Okay, kid, you're just embarrassing yourself. You have no idea what you're talking about concerning law school, Columbia Law here, want to meet?
You're just ignoring information and demand proof before anything can be proven, that kind of thinking would lead you to believe that the moon landing is fake, and something mysterious happened in Roswell, here's a piece of advice, if something can't be prove or disprove, we, by law are required to act based on the presumption of innocence, but it doesn't mean that information can be ignored just because they're not directly linked, idiot.
That's how thesis, theory is formed. You want to ignore that, fine. Keep living in that bubble if you want to. I did show what I had found, kid. It's a case, which has really obvious evidence, number of illegal immigrants, by definition is criminal, millions of them, will be prosecuted and arrested if the policies against illegal immigrants are passed. So if you don't consider that as valid motive, then maybe you should ignore witness protection, because there is no proof whatsoever that the criminals will "harm" the witness, right? Where did you go to school, Ixtapa?
There are 2 kinds of prove, idiot. Direct proof, and indirect proof, the direct proof is used to convict someone, but the indirect ones are used, when the direct ones aren't available, they're used to make a case against something, such as criminal records, motive. That's how people got investigated before being arrested. You're seeing the situation as whether something is absolutely proved or it is false, which is ignorant. Clear?
Disproving or proving something in an absolute way requires hard evidence. Which are usually not available because most criminals aren't that stupid, they're smarter than you. But we're also more clever, we have the right to suspect somebody of something, as in how the police department have the right to suspect anybody and listed anybody related into the investigation if they don't have solid alibi, and even when they have alibi, the police still have the right to suspect that something happened, because out of all possible situation, there are more situation that something happened indirectly than nothing happened at all. So given the information above, it's reasonable to assume that something is happening and demand an investigation into the matter, but we can't. Those illegal immigrants are being protected by the same senators, representative that they support and committed crimes to vote for, information, kid, learn it. Where would people learn that? Law school, kid, they even taught that in college, maybe you should go there.
There isn't proof, because if there was proof, the majority of Democrats would be impeached, like I said, it's not absolute, we're in the process of investigating.
You're really delusional, aren't you. Copying words without even thinking what they meant. The proving and disproving something is only required in the court of law, why? Because it's in that court of law that the government will use their tremendous power to exercise those judgement, and that requires a relatively correct judgement. But when discussing about a case that isn't in a court of law, for example, like this one. You need to give information to make a case. Otherwise we can't catch any murderer if they're not caught at the scene, why? Because you can't suspect anyone because there are no hard proof. So, learn to read, and then learn to think about what you read. Because you're just embarrassing yourself
An old Chinese saying for you: If you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how you know. You don't know anything, kid. Go back to school, pathetic!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rumi9005 It has always been a national emergency, people just have been ignoring it. It happened under Obama, Bush, before that, you didn't care. Now we do care, and we voted for this President, not the public vote, there's a reason why we don't use that. Learn it.
You should ask Lincoln why slavery was a bad thing, Washington, Adams, Jefferson all used the system. Your arguement is as flawed as it's dumb. Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
@jrich745 Where, give link, quote can be made up, kid. Give a source, official release? Anywhere? Go ahead, give a link. It's not a quote unless there are proof of that "quote". Where? Give one.
You don't believe, not evidence, you could be stupid, who knows. No, Trump Tower has wall, like any other working building and houses, it protects the people inside, that's why we're going to build one. Learn to think. Pathetic.
1
-
@jrich745 Yeah, I have a better one for you. The official release statement of the DEA, read it. It's long but not that long, mostly graphics.They actually discussed the matter in that article with full context. Let me break your illusion,
First: Illegal border crossing isn't down, the article only mentioned illegal crossing that were apprehended, and furthermore, what do you think's gonna happen when they already gotten into the country? Did the people who got in just go out and re enter every year? Do the math, they stay, so of course it's gonna go down, but it keeps adding up
Second: People who come into the country don't aim at border counties, idiot. You don't go to the border to deal drugs, or find jobs. You go for the center, or close the center, and again, "counties". Not state, counties. Think a bit
Third, most undocumented immigrants don't sneak through the border, well they're the civilized one who could get a visa. The dangerous ones, (caravan) didn't, and furthermore is that this statement has no source.
Fourth, fine, not terrorist, people with serious criminal history, intention of violence, criminals. They're slightly better, but if you think that you should let a criminal into your own home just because terrorist have been stopped from entering then you're crazy.
Fifth, no caravan are sneaking, they're rushing the border, want to look? There are footage, asylum seekers don't attack border patrol agents and scale the barrier. Those actions, if happened domestically are called thieves. Study.
Sixth, drugs entering, only known drugs, apprehended drugs are hidden. Why do you think they know that they're hidden? Think a bit, if the drugs coming in are caught at checkpoint, why would they go through the checkpoint, idiot.
Seventh, Conservative political figures? Who? One representative? All politicians in the past agreed on the barrier? Need some footage?
Eighth, 354 miles already have fence? So what, the border is way much more than that, do you keep your wall holed because 30% is already filled?
Ninth, polls conducted by whom? Credibility? There was an actual election and Donald Trump was voted as the President, that's more accurate than any poll. And if you're gonna pull the "public vote", there's a reason we don't use that. Montana does contribute to the country, not just California.
The entire article is a bunch of nonsense. I just did you a favor of pointing it out.' Read carefully and choose a better agenda next time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jrich745 "Drive under it". You don't think at all, do you. We have air control, coast guard, even sensors under ground. But what we don't have is a physical barrier. The more you type, the more desperate you get, if you can't give out actual reasons, stop lying to people, it's despicable. We're at the end of the 18th day, we addressed the nation, saying that he won't cave in.
Let me give you a hint, that decision isn't made by him alone, it's made by his staff, consists of way smarter people than you. Don't be desperate.
1
-
@russk8091 A piece of advice kid, if you can't give out any arguement, typing long won't make you less pathetic. People do read, unlike you.
You have better solution, go ahead. The most simplistic thing exist for a reason. If you think that having walls won't help, answer this question, do your house have a wall?
An old saying that is also medieval but very true. If you do know, say that you do know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know. You don't know anything, go back to school because you're just embarasseing yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Buddy, you don't know much about history, economics, science or technology, don't you?
For the last several hundred years, your systems failed miserably in improving the lives of common people. It established a gigantic class differences which was slightly better than the slave and aristocratic time but no where near a "working system". The rise of what's called "the middle class", and a system severely over romanticized, is what you would refer the US age after WW2, where the cowardice USA hide behind 2 gigantic oceans and suffered minimum losses but very quickly reap all the benefits.
And with the gained benefits as the position as "world leader", a proclaimed position accepted by no one but by default goes to the remaining country that left standing after WW2, by hiding, the US fueled it's economy with growth and development gained from having little competition due to the headstart gained from the war. And US lackey, the Western European bunch gained some benefits because of it. However, this literally means using this coincidental benefits to sabotage everyone else who doesn't fall in line. It's also very beneficial that the major power in Russia and China got lost with their whole radical socialism movement that they lag behind greatly.
That time is over, hombre. As the world catches up, especially Russia and Asia, the US advantage increasingly becomes smaller, Russia has more resources and China has a better pool of population, both in quality and quantity.
And cracks start to show, it doesn't help certain political disaster caused your entire country to be filled with massive corruption and chaos.
Those aren't done by the left or the right, it's caused by your system, unlimited freedom with no discipline as well as direction. Left or Right politicians, they're equally corrupt and they implemented literally the exact same ridiculous policy that benefited themselves and not you. This is your tradition, pal. Don't delude yourself. You were never great, you were just lucky. The rest of the world with a much deeper history than you, more sophisticated philosophy than you, they were great. They didn't rely on coicidences over a short period of time to achieve greatness, their greatness is long lasting by certain core characteristics of the culture. The last 70 years were temporary, better catch up with reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@БогданБеркут I won't insult you but your ignorance is off the chart.
You seemingly can't distinguish between a people and a name of a kingdom. Name of Kingdom changes, but the people remains there an ethnicity. Slovakia is a kingdom for the Slovaks, now they existed as a tribal and part of Empires throughout history but there's no denying that they are a people.
I'll granted, I used the wrong words, it's not the Russian Empire ruled them for 200 years so they automatically became Russians. It's the that Russian Empire ruled them 200 years and an overwhelming majority of the population there have came to recognized themselves as Russian therefore they're Russians. That's what distinguish this case from the case of Ireland, the Irish people never come to recognized themselves as British, the same goes to the ones under British rule in India. But that's not "Ukraine". There was no separate group of people there.
Even if you go the back to the trace of the 8th century of the Kievan Rus time, which of course is the ancestors of Russians today, it literally shows the entire Eastern part of today "Ukraine" as part of Kievan Rus, therefore, occupied by Russian people.
It doesn't matter if some dude created a word in a University pal, I'm sure that there's someone using the word Texans in the official documents right now but it doesn't create a Texan people, they're part of the US. Now if there was some people that occupy on those territories that wanted to separate, they failed, and therefore the entirety of the population there throughout history lived as a part of Russian, not because there was a prior state of these "Ukrainians" and then they were invaded by Russians, unlike the case of Ireland where there was an Irish people and British were foreigners.
No, they have always been one people starting out in Kiev, and then got conquered by the Mongols and then some King reunified them and expand their influence to Moscow today. When the central of power shift to Moscow, the ruling class moved to Moscow, but the people of the "Russian Empire" or "Tsardom of Russia" or "Kievan Rus" has always been Russian, even if they're called by different name. The ruling family of "Kievan Rus" literally ruled the Tsardom of Russia as well.
What you mentioned in that Census was a lie that either you intentionally lie or you're very ignorant of. They recorded these "Ukrainians" as "Little Russians", not because they deemed that those people are separate foreign people, but as a branch of the gigantic Russian Family.
To explain this simply, Texans still means American.
So again, everything you typed about history of that region is false.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh, we are afraid, smart people afraid when morons came up to power, it's stupid, reckless, dangerous. She's not Trump, she doesn't have any knowledge, any experience on anything in life. It's not "villainfy" if the fact itself is villainous. Vice News, fake news. They want to talk about health care, education, minimum wage, well they did talk about those things, poorly, badly, horribly, how are you gonna pay for those, the "progressive" people say that tax should cover some, and then the government should pay for the rest. Really progressive alright, progressively idiotic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If an idiot starts taking definition out of a dictionary to lecture economist worldwide, you're wasting your time watching him.
Socialism here isn't socialism in a book, kid, it's socialism in real life as in where people basically stealing other people's products to become the sole control of something.
Firefighting, policemen, and ambulance are not socialism, people agreed to that.
What people didn't agree is to pay a tax paying for a healthcare which they don't want, they don't use and they don't need.
Treat everybody equal doesn't mean everybody should be equal, because then God is forced to equal to man, this guy is a moron. Too many brainwashed minions.
Drop an argument, I'll destroy you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richardgill7121 Oh, I forgot that you people have no idea of how it works. Just because your little shop works, you think that method can applied in a mega mall. No wonder you people can't pay your taxes.
Pathetic, tell me, which of those countries hold the same quality as US top health care, you would go to Sweden to do a heart transplant?
And tell me which one holds the population of 300 millions,
Which one of those countries has 50% of it's households not paying any taxes.
Tell me, moron. Pathetic! Want healthcare there, fine, go to Norway, "Scandinavian", let's see how long you live if you get in a car accident or a heart attack.
A one payer system is compelled to be accompanied by a private system because people don't put their lives on chances, that's what happened in Canada, and even Canadian comes to America to have surgeries. Do some research, learn to think.
Use your brain, her so called plan, even though it's more of a bubble than a plan, requires an extra 2.4 trillions per year. Where you're gonna get it? Stealing, is that it. Is that your answer. The top 1% of Canadians, Swedish, Norwegians might be able to cover for your kind in their country because their population is way too low. But this is America.
Vietnam, China has been applying the same system, want to see a picture of their hospitals? Even the private ones are crowded with all kinds of people. Pathetic reasoning, kid. Go back to school.
1
-
1
-
@richardgill7121 You do realize that Paris revolution failed, right. People saw the flaw in it, that's why they didn't retain power. And that's probably why the Statue of Liberty is regarded as an American monument, as in how we used it as a beacon to our definition of liberty.
Your delusion of a society where everybody is equal at everything is like a bubble, the more you expand, the more likely it is to pop, and then it will definitely pop.
Market forces may have killed millions, they've saved billions since then by adapting to the change of the society. You're making the basic mistake of applying scenarios from the past without concerning the changes, it's called stupidity. This isn't 1931, it's 2018. A lot of things have changed, for example, we let people get away with not paying any taxes. Because we're now more tolerance towards poor people, as in not pure capitalist.
Clear?
And if you do study about these things, you'll see that the social system directly affect the economic system, and vice versa. Even highschool students in Vietnam and China learned this. It's one of the doctrine they are forced to learn. To acknowledge that the existence of a stable one party system is directly link to a healthy economic system. Even though that's total nonsense. People still fell for it.
My advice, read some real books.
1
-
@richardgill7121
Okay, are you stupid, moron. There hasn't been any pure socialist society, either. PATHETIC IDIOT, LEARN TO READ.
Capitalism created tremendous wealth, allowing people to move forward, hence, the creation of what we now called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, from then on, the creation of liberty, from then on, modern society. Which part of that is confusing to you? It's not the reading, right? Because a 10 year-old can understand that simple fact. Want to speak with my little sister?
First of all, about healthcare, if you're trying to say that the we are the worst in healthcare, why is all the top hospitals here? Why are all the medical breakthrough are from here? Why do people go to America to have surgeries instead of Canada.
You're a sad, little person, who can't distinguish between healthcare quality for the top and the average ones. Your think the top 10% goes to the public sector where they paid 70% of it?
No, our system is bad on avergae, because 50% percent of the population don't pay taxes, they're using the facilities for free, of course it's bad. Infant mortality, same reason. So is life expectancy, IDIOT.
Our healthcare system isn't for the American people, it's for the American people who pays their way in with their works and merits. It's called meritocracy, learn it, you moron.
Ask anybody, whether you would like to treat cancer in America, all expense paid for, or would you like to treat it in Canada.
Distinguish the two because you're just being pathetic.
A simple analogy, the average level isn't a measure of the approximate level of every part. It could be some part really, really high plus some really, really low parts.
You want to complain why you're not getting dreamy healthcare, how about getting a job. The top 10% is paying for 70% of everything in the country, if you belong to the bottom 90%, you may as well get only 3.3% of what the top 10% is having.
Do you think bankers and brokers are having world ranked 47th healthcare. Pathetic!
Learn some math.
1
-
@frankspeaking2630 Okay, like I said, moron. Mathematics, learn some.
If only 10% is paying their share, then 90% of Americans aren't, it has best centres in the world, but those places can only extend life for 10, maybe 20 years
The rest 90% of the people, may die before time, because that's how it is.
The rich make money, we earn those money, we use those money, are you giving away everything to Africa, kid? Do you even make anything? Pathetic.
Life expectancy is shortened with alcohol, obesity, drugs, all those things. There, use your brain. Want to compare the life expectancy at the top. We don't have the most expensive healthcare, we have the most advanced healthcare and it came with the "most advanced" price for some, we do have middle grounds, unfortunately, that middle class number is too small to cover for all life expectancy. What can we do with a lot of people throwing their lives away?
So yeah, math just destroy your entire argument right there.
Put UK in charge of 270 millions people who only pay 30% of their program.
Pathetic little moron, here's an advice, if you can't say anything, the best way to save your face is to stay silent. You're just embarrassing yourself.
1
-
@richardgill7121
Boy, wtf we're you thinking posting nonsense.
50% of American population doesn't pay taxes, there more "revenue" ? Want to know where, read some research, statistics, there are public reports of this. Need a link? If you don't do any research, don't type anything.
You live in Australia, there, end of discussion, you're living here, and you don't have any knowledge about here, get some before you type. The reason your country survives, maybe its population is low enough, want to compare to Vietnam, kid?
80 million people, more "tax revenue" there? The difference in healthcare? Your entire argument is detached from reality.
4.2 trillion dollars come from the report which she based this plan on. Read it, like I said, do some research, kid.
The top 1% is paying for 40% of the country and it's not fair share? How fair would you want to be? Do they get 66 times the service, or 66 times the gratitude? Definitely not. And if you wonder where I get the figure 66, here's a clue, it called math. Learn some math.
Social programs working where? UK? How much is their population? So is Canada? Why isn't people in countries like Vietnam, 80 million people, get the same result as Scandinavian countries, they're applying the same social program. Your mind is too small to think big, learn how to think bigger, kid.
For your question, I would be fine, kid. Me and the people like me are paying 70% of the country, so I think I'll do just fine. Less tax, more savings, it's called thinking. You should learn how to if you want to live a meaningful life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's some research, Monde, if you're pathetic and don't have any balls to exercise your living rights, you shouldn't be living, he's a grown man, feel scared, shut up, otherwise come out and face it, Spacey did it, and Spacey is being attacked by failures such as the "abused" guy, get a job, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidthomas9165 There are plenty of evidence, at first, she married this "Hirshi" out of faith, and then after a few children, she entered this "legal" marriage with this stranger Elmi, who live in the same house with both her and her ex husband.
You must be insane to think that this is completely normal?
And a spouse of a US Citizen is much more easier to get a green card. And even worse, because Omar is a refugee from Somalia, she claim no birth certificate. She can't prove Elmi and her sibling relationship, even if she wants to get him a green card.
Ilhan Omar is the youngest out of 7 children. Before she got an asylum claim in the US, they spent 4 to 5 years at refugee camps near the border of Somalia, things get scattered, people got smuggled away. Intentionally or Unintentionally.
Out of 7 children in the family, only 3 made it to the United States, you can see from her family picture.
https://ilhanomar.com/about/
So what happened to the other 4? Usually they're categorized as missing, who knows what goes on backstage.
You see that it's completely fine for her to just ignore the criticism aim at her by the entire Republican Party, event though a 20$ DNA test can debunk the whole thing? Elmi is a UK citizens, DNA tests are available there. Logically, this one test can raise her millions of dollars, seeing the image of a Muslim woman being targeted wrongly by the GOP. Perfect politic strategy. Why isn't she doing it?
How dumb are you?
1
-
@davidthomas9165
Because giving a green card to a spouse is much easier than a sibling.
Math, you see. That answers your question of "why".
She should take the DNA test, not at the demand of anything, but to embarrass her political opponent. I'm sure you have all sort of fantasy lined up on why she would missed out on such an opportunity. Here's a simpler explanation than all of those fantasy. She lied to you, kid.
She's completely legal to not provide evidence, however, are you really that low to say people doing minimal legal stuff is admirable? Like a murderer asserting his 5th amendment privilege while pleading not guilty is totally fine?
Again, how dumb are you?
Let's skip the whole legal and illegal things Omar are required to do.
You're dumb enough to believe that despite having all of the advantage, Omar choose not to use any of them?
Just like Elizabeth Warren when she did that DNA test, easy way to "silence" critics.
Now you might live in a world where people tip toeing on the law, not to confirm their innocent, but to avoid being convicted is totally fine. But again, that's like a really sad world, a world for idiots, have a higher standard, mate.
A simple solution to the theory that the "lab result" is fake, is to make it a public lab and do 2 different test. One lab choice given to the Republicans. That's an easy way to provide transparency. Now it might not silence the far right, but will win over countless "centrist". That is not enough? Again, brilliant political move.
Unless Omar's an idiot, so the question, How dumb are you, pal?
The undeniable conclusion, either Omar's a criminal or she's an idiot.
I don't know which one is better for you dummies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
wrong, Trump family can't be corrupt, it has only been 4 years since their family first involvement into politics, so unless you can find any proof of corruption in the last 4 years, you have nothing.
Before that, they were private citizens and are entitled to giving special treatment to family members like all any other conglomerate. Ask Samsung.
Hunter Biden has been a part of his father corruption scheme for decades.
Joe Biden has been a politician for 47 years.
So learn to distinguish the two, pal, you know.
Using facts.
And by common sense, any kids of Trump is about 10 times more qualified than this junkie.
For the first thing, none of them is an addict and all of them had years of experience in their fields.
Hunter is a lawyer who never practiced law, got thrown out of the military and became an energy genius overnight. Einstein took 10 years to achieve that. Hunter did it in 48 hours. Brilliant.
That sounds odd to you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@y3flamex250 That's another lie. There's no tons of ad providers are leaving, some have temporarily paused their activies. But countless remains.
Twitter cut 75% of their staff and lost about 15% of ad revenue.
Do you see the difference?
No Twitter Blue is genius. Because they get free money for doing nothing they hadn't already done. And that goes on indefinitely for new users who want to use the platform in the future.
Twitter Blue is relaunched now to fix the fake account problem. So I don't see any problem, people are giving Twitter extra money every month for doing nothing. Sure, it's unethical business but it's good business.
Advertisers have always went where users go, in the last month or so, some, only some advertisers paused their activities on Twitter due to doubt of users leaving, content mismanagement, etc
But the overwhelming majority of advertisers stayed, which means those advertisers are content with the current platform. And those advertisers staying, including the biggest spender are proof of how there's nothing wrong currently.
Show some respect and stop spreading lies, pal. With social media company, users are everything. Countless users want to use Twitter, need to use Twitter, because Twitter gives them the best of service, and therefore Twitter will have numerous ways of getting money. Whether to sell ads, or to sell data.
Your assumption of how Twitter can't get a profit just denies reality in general. Keep it real, homie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jebvilla That's not what happened, genius. It's only a ponzi scheme if somebody steal your money.
Nobody stole their money, they invested using a token whose values can be decreased at any times.
No, that's not the only way UST as a token can make moneys. The key principle is this, UST is the most functional transaction token in the world, if that token becomes crucial a certain business of somekind, the value will increase greatly.
But how do UST becomes crucial to a certain business? More people must be using it. How do you do that? More people has to use it. How do you do that? You lure them in with interesting interest rates.
Interest rates that Do Kwon has, pal. The interest is in UST, not in dollars, a certain number of UST that Do Kwon had. That's not a ponzi scheme, that's an investement, Do Kwon was paying people with his own UST to get them to deposit UST, in turns making UST more valuable. Like Uber, discounting prices to lure in more users.
What happened was lost of confidence in UST, Do Kwon did not steal anything or committed fraud on anybody, UST lost it's values, the interest of 20% is still there, it's just in UST, but UST is now worthless therefore the interest is worthless, that's not Ponzi, that's like stock market, if the stock falls, you end up with nothing. There's no fraud, there's no ponzi.
Go learn some Economics. Luna and UST did exactly what they were supposed to do, the token death spiral is not even a secret, it can always happen, that's public knowledge of algorithmic stable coin that the investors ignored. The "investors" got greedy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joseph7988 First of all, it was never widespread to that scale of you colonialist. Most countries never enslave a completely different nation compared to theirs overseas. Most countries stay within their land borders and associated regions. You homies enslaved people that has nothing to do with you, that is nasty.
There's no cultural aspect here to the birth of Galileo, homie, the culture at that time was him being burned alive, it was only after he showed you the truth that he changed the culture itself, that's what actually happened, not some fantasy you thought of inside your head. It was that accident that propelled you towards the new age, before that, the Europeans were poor, unsophisticated, this is fact, before that guy, there was nothing there. The Roman Empire looks pale in comparison with the sophistication of the Chinese Empire, where they were able to unite a far more diverse region, using the same language, same measurement systems, same set of basic laws, they have much better cuisine as well.
And furthermore, the technological development has nothing to do whether something is feudal or not, the technological advancement of Europe achieved it's burst during the reign of aboslute monarchs.
Buddy, you have shown a complete ignorance of mathematics, science, technology, society, both Western and Eastern. I suggest you go get a better education.
There's nothing special about European culture, it's the same as every other culture, shaped by the outer environment of nature and certain accidental breakthroughs that are independent of the culture in general. All of it converges to a common set of values, where the human soul seeks freedom and happiness, certain accidents can propel that journey but it's going to happen sooner or later, the obvious proof is that countless discoveries were simultenously discovered throughout multiple cultures and the usage of such technologies are always implemented, the human mind seeks happiness and utilizing technology to do so is universal.
This is admitted facts, without the number 0, there's no modern mathematics, without trignometry, there's no modern science, without the compass, there's no navigation, it's all converging towards the truth, no discovery is more special than another discovery, they have different usage but they're all equally the truth, whether it's discovered sooner or later is completely irrelevant.
Buddy, you can deal with that reality or not, but it doesn't change the truth. This is me doing you a favor because if you want to compare just culture depth alone, both by length and by depth the Europeans will be ruthlessly crushed by the Asians, even right now, the Chinese are crushing you at nearly everything. Show some respect.
1
-
1
-
@clintonsmith5163 False, kid.
If you have a gun illegally in places that don't allow you to have that gun, and then you having that gun is a reasonable reason for others to believe you're a criminal. Everybody has the right to attack you because you're in the act of committing a crime.
How do I say this gently, you can have a gun illegally at private events and then use it to defend yourself legally if other people suddenly attack you.
But if you bring out that gun intentionally and causes panic, you started the illegal conflict, you're not entitled to self defense anymore because you caused that panic.
Rittenhouse did not started the illegal conflict because it was an open carry state, and it was a public street, he has every right to be there.
Had the gun been there illegal, you would have to decide whether Kyle's action caused a "panic" and started the illegal conflict. But in this case Kyle did everything legally.
But if you show up to a Trump rally and suddenly pull out a gun, you started the illegal conflict, stripping you of your rights to self defense. Get that, snowflake?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@riccphoto What? Intellectually capable people are too scary for you? Everybody capable of thinking will reach their own conclusion. I'm perfectly open to discussing this but you wouldn't dare.
Russia has a lot of business in Ukraine, a lot of people in those regions are ethnically Russians, who are receivingg too much mistreatment from the terrorist regime. You don't think they are but Russia does. The Ukrainian Coastline is a strategic military advantage that must not be in unsafe hands, Russia doesn't trust Ukraine so they took it. Acting in their national interest, why is that none of their business?
China and India is not distancing at all, China and India stayed exactly the same as they were in February, which is why your sanction is nearly harmless, people still get their smartphones from China. Sad, isn't it, to know how truly alone you are.
China is next, after Russia win this, China will take Taiwan, India will probably be neutral for a while because Pakistan is a bit too powerful.
You don't get it, do you? Those countries, China, India, Russia are not friends, but they all have one thing in common, they hate you Americans.
Imperialists with their constant propaganda of freedom while doing exactly the opposite all over the world. And they demonstrated their hatred quite well when they abandoned you earlier this year in the UN, and are still doing until this day, they just abandoned you yesterday one more time.
So those are the observable facts, what are your reasons? Make belief?
1
-
@riccphoto Your ex unfortunately doesn't represent 144.1 million people living in Russia, darling. And nobody is crying over getting Iphones, they're horrible products, the numbers are clear. 75% of the smartphone market are not Iphones, overpiced, common functions.
Does the numbers too complicated for you too understand? America sanction Russia, and weirdly, American life got worse. Higher gasoline, higher food, higher inflation.
Sad, isn't it.
1
-
1
-
Right, because Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lybia, are all wonderful acts?
It's not flawed thinking, it's common sense, kid. We live in a world where the rule of force applies, America could've ended it when it's the only superpower from the 1990s to the 2010s, but it chose not to. This is the consequences. Other countries are sick of you pigs, show some respect.
1
-
1
-
@lmao.3661 You protested? You failed, sorry.
We have been living with the consequences of your failures for over 20 years.
So you know. People don't support Ukraine, darling, you support Ukraine, and for your benefits alone.
The bottom line is quite clear, you, your country, your society have been imposing it's power over smaller countries for over 20 years now, you may protest but you have failed, people have been facing the consequences of your failure.
So just stop pretending that you have the moral superiority.
Most people are against wars, but an even bigger number of people are against the state where American is the only one starting and benefiting from war, so they chose the previous option.
And therefore most people are against you.
Russia, India, China, they're sick of you, and unfortunately for you, them and their allies are the majority of the global population
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@machioveli2688 He said there's quid pro quo in any sort of aid or deal in the world, the point is that quid pro quo here is on behalf of a country, not an individual.
Go study some philosophy, that's basic for morons like you to understand, kid. Biden offered aid to fire one specific prosecutor and he does that to one person directly, to benefit himself.
Trump withheld aid until the country can fix the problem with corruption.
Nice try, kid, go back to school, in Biden case, you can't prove that the prosecutor is corrupted, he's not even rich. But with Trump's case, Ukraine is fairly corrupted. Biden admitted it on tape.
Stop living in a bubble.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aolvaar8792 Household, pal, household, average 2 people gaining 63000, not to mention that the number also means half of the country is earning less than 63000.
Learn some math, it's not even high.
So here, by your idiotic argument that if that much is enough for people to get healthcare, why aren't they getting it?
Your argument is forcing employers to pay for their healthcare, taking from their salary to do so, but the employers are already paying them enough money for healthcare?
So 2 possible situation, if the money paid is enough to get healthcare, then the people is fine to do whatever they want with the money, they can spend it, choosing not to get healthcare is their choice. And the second possibility, which is you're very wrong, and people don't make enough to pay for the healthcare, then your idea would force employers to give out free money. Think a bit, fake math doesn't work, because it's fake.
1
-
@aolvaar8792 Again, you math is just simply wrong, it's fake. Median household income doesn't mean everybody is making that much, it means in the middle, households are making such, the 28% of the single are all below 63000, except the single millionaires and upper middle class, don't be dumb, pal.
Like I said, your policy is just stupid, your employer pays your healthcare because they believe that you made enough to cover your healthcare with you. The difference between your wage and your market is that what was put into your healthcare, the employer didn't give you any extra, learn some math.
Like I said, the logic stays the same, individuals in the lower class don't make enough to pay for healthcare, they can't get healthcare, they created less than what they spend. .
What is your excuse of stealing from employers?
Again, if the people are paid what they made, the healthcare is already included, and if your employer pays the healthcare for you, you'll be paid less.
The value isn't increased or decreased, so the policy affecting this is either total nonsense or stealing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
Spinning isn't the hard part, physic wise, the hard part is minimal body movement to show effortlessness in dance moves, that also decrease the body capability of generating strength, and that's only happen with female dance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
samsa deniz Is it something worth risking your career??? The industry is built on chances, also, sexual harassment is not a crime, especially after 20 years, why do you think they waited 20 years, they use Weinstein, it's the "harassment" that gave them the advantage, without Weinstein, non of them would be heard, they would be nobody, so before talking about moral standards, use your brain to figure out that the whole " come out thing" is based on immoral actions
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@unplugyourself7335 So what are you going to do with the rest of the people who work equally as hard as him, sometimes even harder but lacks that luck?
Exactly when you admit that luck is necessarry and is the differentiating factors among hard working people, you literally admitted that the differentiation between him and other equally hard working people are undeserving. You have to learn to reason from your own comment, hombre.
If you reason from the Physics standpoint upward, there's literally nothing more or less special about any of these people except that they were at the right place, at the right time, with right attributes, and yes, it's all due to luck, that's why initial conditions determine the solution of a physical equation. You have to learn Physics, bro, it automatically eliminates your argument of him being "more deserving" than other people just because he was successful. Now he can be a very successful person while being not that remarkable, because of luck, and he can also be very much ignorant about a lot of things, and he's showing you his ignorance right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisso871 No, no, kid.
China, India, Brazil are not poorer countries.
Are you still under the sad illusion that just because the dollars worth ten times some currency, it means the waiter in America is producing 10 times the value of another countries waiters?
Keep it real, darling. Human labour are human labour, if those countries chose to ignore you, your currency holds now power over them.
3/4 of Asia abstaining is not some poorer country. That's the majority of global population.
Get out of the bubble, little man.
The countries you name are countries that directly support Russia. Unfortunately for you, there are other countries that abstained, which is as good as saying we don't see anything wrong with the war, aka business as usual.
Is it terrifying? To see how lonely you truly are? And that the world hates you pigs?
1
-
@chrisso871 I'm assuming you're an imperialist pig because of your ignorant point of view. So you know, one of a kind and I'm pretty confident I am correct.
Putin wield power to benefit what he believe in the most, the greatness of his country. I don't find that attractive but it's quite admirable, it certainly more admirable than what you imperialist pigs did your whole life. Oppressing people and then pretend to have the moral highground, no, kid. That's not how life works. You exploit foreign countries subtly through your practice of unfair trade and monetary policy. Now it would be fine if you do that and then claim that you do it, but no, you pretend to have the moral highground and that is sick. Not to mention all those military interventions in Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Serbia,...
Count the bloods on your hands, you'll be shocked by how many there is. EU, NATO, America, all the same kind. Just by living there, ignoring the crimes of your government, you have participated in it. Privileged imperialists that think they are the only ones capable of treading upon other people, no more, pal. Time is up, now it's other people's turn to act in their interest.
Show some respect, little man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Buddy, Kissin is the least qualified person for you to listen too. The guy is a serious fraud, he never lived in Russia, he lived in Uzbekistan, which used to be part of the Soviet Union, but a rural part. He never experienced society in Russia as an adult. He came to England at the age of 11. Literally he's as ignorant as most British people.
He doesn't have an education in anything about Russian, or Russian governing system, Russian economy, or any economy, or any governing system. Totally unqualified and absolutely ignorant on many issues he proclaim to know. All of his talkings points are crude, simplistic, sometimes straight out false and are backed up by zero evidence.
You're going to need to listen to a better individual, pal. Comedians aren't experts, they're comedians, they're actors, they lie to you about who they are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, the CNN guy didn't read the report, or he's playing dumb to brushing up Cortez's ass. Anybody who actually read and still claim to be "supporting" of it is plain lying, and it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Leo-xj8hw That's the wrong point, because that's only one test and it made no sense for him to score 124. He literally teaches the things that require that ability to score high on those tests to understand.
So again, go learn some math, little darling.
The "test" is literally just a collection of questions that people think shall correctly estimate one's intelligence. There can be many type of test developed by many researchers, some of the tests may even be physics or mathematical tests, which also indicates a very high intelligence and Feynman shall ace those tests because he literally does those tests everyday in his classes and his research.
So pal, whatever the case is, if the test is correct, and if Feynman did his best, it's impossible for him to score low.
Like I said, the explaination is that Feynman didn't take the test seriously. And you shall need more than one test to proof something. So keep it real and go learn some math.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dilbertresvicksonburg4273 Pal, you can't ignore people who already destroyed your logic before you type your reply. It's just embarrassing, what you mentioned, is totally false and I pointed out why, if you don't bother to read the full reply, I suggest go elsewhere to troll. It's not a threat when stating that somebody has the full right to self defense , by any means, (shooting) when under threat (being physically assaulted), so yeah, your argument crumbled, you can't ignore that and pretend to be correct, you're wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheSolarScience
You know, when i started to consider that you are a serious person with real facts, I start to read the document which you gave, and it's total nonsense. Don't be a troll, pal.
I don't know where you get these kind of soundbite but it's not going to work among real people with real intelligence.
The 2 documents link you provided, either you didn't read them at all, or you're just too stupid to understand what it means.
First, "GAO, Opportunities Exist to Strengthen Policies and Processes for Managing Emergency Assistance, GAO-11-696. Table 8 (page 131), 2011".
Read page 130, pal, they specifically pointed out that the amount of money is accumulated due to the renewal of each loans, pal. PCDF loans which are renewed daily, let banks borrow money for one night, in exchanged of a collateral asset, and pay back the money the next day. However, during the financial crisis, the loans are made in the form of multiple loans in a row for the same asset. The first day you borrow money for an asset, the next day you return the money and borrow the money again, letting the same asset in as a collateral.
These loans are accumulated as daily loans. But they are for the same asset, therefore it's just one amount of money.
So your 16 trillions claim is actually 160 billions, because the loans are made in the span of 100 days. Don't just repeat the soundbite, read the actual report.
Second "Levy Institute estimated the bailout cost to be $29 trillion (Levy Institute, Working Paper No. 698, December 2011", this report fails in page 5.
If you had read it, it shows clearly the "trillion" word here, comes mostly from credit extension, which by the name, is not actually money being drawn out, it's called money capable of being drawn out. Being calculated so that if a bank has assets, they can withdraw how much money as loans.
In the case of AIG, in 2009, they're valued low because of low liquidity, but in fact, they held multiple assets which can not be sold, but they are still assets that can produce wealth in long term. For example, a building is worth zero if nobody's willing to buy it, but it's still a building, the value of it is estimates in billions, because it's not the current price, but estimation of future price.
The credit extension by the Feds, even though are trillions, are very much in line with what assets AIG have at the time, they also hold asset of nearly trillion.
So yeah, with after finding fatal flaw in those 2 document alone, I decided that you're a troll, and it's probably too complicated for you to understand what I've just explained.
So here, GO BACK TO SCHOOL, TROLL, DON'T REPEAT THE SOUNDBITE, IT'S NOT TRUE.
1
-
@TheSolarScience You still don't know anything, pal, I don't know where you get these propaganda, I admit, these propaganda are effective and it sounds like they're solid, but that only works with little kids.
Read the real report troll, I just pointed out the lies you make.
Pathetic.
You can't make dollars out of thin air, because that is not real money, if it's not real money, you can't trade it therefore it loose the value of being dollars.
Credit, loans, they're all required to be backed up with physical assets, the only money not backed by anything is the physical dollar bill, they can print it, and there are only 1.5 trillions in circulation.
So your claim of 60 trillions, it's ridiculous, I pointed out the flaws, you're troll, I suspect, so stop spreading lies
1
-
@TheSolarScience So your 2 only verifiable document was shred to pieces so now you go on to base your ridiculous argument based on hearsay?
1. And pal, I have destroyed your lies about the " GAO, Opportunities Exist to Strengthen Policies and Processes for Managing Emergency Assistance, GAO-11-696. Table 8 (page 131)", so yeah, re typing that is just pure trolling. Read page 130, they specified in their own reports why the 16 trillions number is stupid, for the likes of you.
https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf, page 130, pal.
2. "Levy Institute, Working Paper No. 698, December 2011, $29,000,000,000,000: A Detailed Look at the Fed’s Bailout by Funding Facility and Recipient". Again, this piece of evidence was also debunked, page 5, read closely, pal. Extension credit, not loans, not money. Learn some math.
3. The testimony of the people given above is not about the money being given out in the bailout, you troll, it's about the potential losses of every default swap on the market. Which it will be 62 trillions, if every single swaps being defaulted. And it has nothing to do with the bail out money because the bail out is only 180 billions. The potential losses of 62 trillions, is not referring to AIG alone, it's referred to the entire market of swaps, and if you actually heard the testimony.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?281644-1/aig-bailout-oversight-hearing-panel-1&start=5435
1:31:27.
The total amount of debt is substantially less because every swap are made against one another, so if a company wins, another company loss, and that loosing company might win on some of the swaps as well, the worst case scenario is 17 trillions. And that number has no yet to occur, because if that's so, then there would be some really wealthy people walking the planet cashing in from credit default swaps.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/if-the-amount-of-62-trillion-d
Poor troll, you see, when you try to lie but provide real evidence, it's very easy to tore your lies apart. Because they're lies.
4. Your claim of withholding of disclosure, has nothing to do with the the figure 62 trillions, the report only says about the threat and the liabilities of the federal reserve acting as an independent agency providing loans. And yes, they might have loss billions, but it's no where near your conspiracy theory of "trillions".
YOU ARE A BIG FAT LIAR.
Your proclaim "facts" are actually not facts but lies, you're either intentionally lying about the reports you quote, or you're too stupid to understand what the report accurately say.
Nice try, you troll. You don't proclaim to know anything, probably because you barely know anything. Learn to read reports properly. Last time, I destroyed only 2 of your fake evidence to spare you your dignity. But this time I destroyed all of your fake evidence.
Have some shame, kid.
1
-
1
-
@TheSolarScience You still do not read, huh, kid?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/if-the-amount-of-62-trillion-d
60 trillion is the amount of swaps available on the market owned by every bank, not just AIG, also Goldman, JP Morgan, Bank of America, everyone, not just AIG, and in that hearing, 5 congressman mentioned the amount in their questions, and the answer debunked that number in the minute blow, why don't you stop being a moron?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?281644-1/aig-bailout-oversight-hearing-panel-1&start=5435
1:31:27, your number is debunked.
The estimate if every swaps is defaulted, which didn't happen, the cost will be only 17 trillions, but that shall never happen, because it didn't happen, nobody cashed in the swaps, because they know by doing so, they shall destroy the US economy.
The withholding from disclosure has nothing to do with 60 trillion, you only have that the withholding is withholding information. It could withhold a few billions, it withhold just a few hundred millions. Even in the report you cite, they only uses billions, you can not make up a number and then use the fact that they're withholding information, to claim that your number is correct.
So yeah, kid, you have been destroyed, here.
Like I said, go back to school, you troll. Nobody finds that you're correct, because you're not correct. In the reports you quote, they pointed out why you're not correct. So why don't you go back to school and stop living in a bubble?
1
-
1
-
@TheSolarScience @Jens Hoekendijk You still do not read, huh, kid?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/if-the-amount-of-62-trillion-d
60 trillion is the amount of swaps available on the market owned by every bank, not just AIG, also Goldman, JP Morgan, Bank of America, everyone, not just AIG, and in that hearing, 5 congressman mentioned the amount in their questions, and the answer debunked that number in the minute blow, why don't you stop being a moron?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?281644-1/aig-bailout-oversight-hearing-panel-1&start=5435
1:31:27, your number is debunked.
6 congressmen mention the number, all being debunked by an answer. I suggest you stop trolling.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ldjcool1 Search up the legality of that, kid, it's illegal to bribe officials of another government to do your bidding, surely a negotiation can be reached but Biden himself admitted that it's a bribery.
Plus the validity of that prosecutor you can not prove, insufficient detail such as if he was insufficient, why didn't the Ukrainian government removed him themselves?
Add this up in court and you have actual crime and actual case for the crime. Nice try, kid, too fed with Russian Collusion hoax that you can't even distinguish what is real crime and what is a hoax anymore.
Pathetic!
Kid, in any way, Biden committed real crime, bribery, even conflict of interest is a possible crime or morally unethical . Get out of the bubble, kids.
1
-
Ellen C They removed themselves from every position of the Organization, those are just companies in their names only.
Trump organization project in Indonesia got a loan from Chinese Banks and it had denied it. Don't just read the title, kid, read the entire article
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/guid/596923D0-BDCD-11E9-978A-2E8334971889
Kushner building was rented by Brookfield asset management, based in Toronto, learn some geography, kid.
And Chinese patents royalties are rightfully Ivanka's, if you wonder why China follow the law, you should ask the Chinese.
Biden bribe people to go against the law, go back to school, you troll,or at least get correct information.
1
-
1
-
@ldjcool1 Yes, you're very much wrong, you're also mistaken the two concept, a deal which is requiring something in return, a lawful action, a cooperation of another country is legal. What is not legal is use to money to make them violate their own officials standards.
When Biden asked for prosecutor removal, it's a straight demand, goes against protocol and it's called bribery.
Most times, country bribe or put pressure on other countries behind close doors, it's illegal but we can't catch them, but Biden admitted and he also had a conflict of interest, it's a solid case.
Don't throw insults just because you loose badly.
1
-
1
-
@ldjcool1 You could live the bubble but that's not gonna last. It's not legal at all to bribe officials overseas to act on your bidding, even TV shows acknowledge this. Don't be a moron.
The prosecutor was investigating Biden's son, it means that Biden has a clear conflict of interest, it could be corruption, it could be tax evasion, maybe illegal trading. Doesn't matter what he did or didn't do, because removal of the investigation into a company means benefits to individuals .
It's called corruption. By your very unlikely theory, Biden did nothing except what the government agenda was. Unfortunately, by having his son in a Ukraine company under investigation, not to mention how his son is incredibly inexperienced, this even fake news media confirmed. Biden himself had a conflict of interest in dealing.
That's a certainty, the lightest crime is conflict of interest. And to ask them to launch investigation is not unreasonable at all. Rudy Giuliani claim that he has proof, solid proof, even though he can't disclose it because logic, you don't unveil proof to the opponents unless in front of court.
But the same kind of logic here applies, the same as Russia Collusion, with Russian Collusion, you have zero proof, zero public source and almost zero result, because it's fake from the beginning.
With Biden case, we have public information of contacts, public record that his son indeed was in that company facing investigation and he also admitted of dealing with the removal of the prosecutor. That plus nothing equals conflict of interest, but that plus crime committed due to his son equals major corruption.
So do the math, kid, either way, you loose. If you claim that what Biden did doesn't deserve investigation, you must also admit that Russia Collusion is a hoax, and if you want to stick by Russia Collusion, Biden needs a serious investigation.
Why don't you go down with some grace, don't be desperate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@successandvictory1950 Again, kid, don't spread fake lies, if you work 2 jobs, you won't have time to drive Uber and Lift. And if you work 2 jobs as such, you won't pay any taxes, because those jobs are so unstable that you can't earn enough, so actually, you don't pay for any part of the wall.
Mexico is paying through jobs we took from them, tax we imposed on them, it's called math, learn it. This is what you get by dropping out of school and don't learn math. Go back to school, kid, study.
1
-
@NoBody-kv3yd So your worst possible lies are just having an affair? That's rich, kid, Blowjob Bill.
And hush money here is very legal, it's called dealing with extortion. That guy who owns Facebook has like 4 of those.
And yeah, the tax cut are for every American Citizens, which includes the super rich, it's called human decency, it's not your money, kid, it's their money, they sacrificed it but it's rightfully theirs.
Don't be a hypocrite.
1
-
@NoBody-kv3yd Blowjob Bill was the President and got defended through all that, it's called moral standard. You're admitting yourself being a hypocrite?
Non Disclosure contract has nothing to do with a person's capability of leading and making right decisions. Your lies, I pointed out that they're all trivial and none of them are serious. Nice try, kid, go back to school.
And this is your major stupidity right here, you don't elect politicians just because they're politicians, you elect politicians because they're usually better than those who aren't politicians, unfortunately, those kinds don't exist anymore and Donald Trump beat them all.
You can keep living in a bubble but it's not gonna change the truth, Donald Trump make America a force to be respected again, China's going down, progress with North Korea, European Countries will pay more for NATO, record low unemployment.
You can keep living in a bubble and pretend that you're smart but it's not gonna change the fact that you're very stupid. Go back to school, you troll.
1
-
@NoBody-kv3yd Clinton didn't get anything for that affair, he got impeached, or failed impeached by investigation of obstruction of justice and sexual harassment, also black mail. An affair is not illegal, black mail is.
If you don't want Clinton impeached then there's nothing wrong with Trump, but if you want impeach Clinton, there's still nothing wrong with Trump, what a candidate did before the Presidency regarding his personal life is personal.
You're mistaken here, I only used Clinton as an example for hypocrites, without Clinton, what Trump did is totally legal. Non Disclosure Contract is protected by the law, it's legal, pal.
And Trump is an efficient, highly productive, America-first person. That's what smart people care about, not his sex life, think a bit, kid.
1
-
@successandvictory1950 No. That's a lie which you made up, kid, first thing, Uber, lyft, whatever app she's running, they still count as one work because her time is the same.
Sorry, unemployment rate doesn't change because she had two jobs, that's not how it works. There are full time jobs which she is unqualified, sorry to say so, but she's playing a stupid game. Here's what you should do, drop the job, put your income to the minimal to get social benefits, use the extra time wisely to raise your value. Learn an extra language, loose some weight, improve yourself and money will come.
Don't steal from people, you're not gonna starve to death.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Next they'll question the nature of the country. And really , I would like that, it's then when the country fell into total chaos that we, the people of logic, freedom and justice will rise to bring down that nonsensical terrorist group. The left, it's no longer a political agenda, anymore. It's even more dangerous than ISIS. Ignoring facts, truth, logic, hating the American Government, that is the real American Taliban.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@88feji Okay, pal you're mistaken again, God isn't a symbol, it's an unknown that controls how things work around us. I'm not a religious person. The Christians, the Jews, the Islams, they can believe whatever they want, and that's their right as human. But you're mistaken the concept of God. God, the definition of the word alters in every individual, it's who they believe controls the very existence, some believe in Christian God, some in Islamic God, some in Jewish God. I defined God as an unknown being who controls the things around us in a mysterious way, not informing us with it presence. You don't have any prove to prove that "it" doesn't exist, like I said, the unknown. So, there goes your logic. And I see that now you're losing the logic debate, you're transforming it into a religious bashing. It's pathetic, if you can't type anything, it's better to stop typing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, let's go with that, and then what you'll see is that the other side, side of idiots, I want to call them that, because that's what they are, the people who refute debates than any other kind. The side where logic doesn't make sense to them. Want to know why? Ask them for a debate, you'll be considered a sexist, a bigot, a pedophile right away. So, again, we shall not compromise with that kind of nonsense, but we'll set it right to how it should be. Did you remember anybody who lived compromise with the Nazis, some did, and plenty of them died before they realized that it's the wrong thing. Clear?
1
-
@AlphaladZXA
Yeah, that's only what you're comfortable with, and sorry. The society doesn't work that way. It doesn't concern how you feel when it's life or death.
A family doesn't have the right to tell a doctor whether to save or not to save a human being, that applies in unconscious people.
This isn't brain dead, brain dead is never going to have the ability to use the brain again, and the removal of a person life support can only be done with their family direct consent. So your analogy is exceptionally flawed when it ignored all facts, reasons. Clear?
This isn't just any nonsense opinion, it's a chain of reasoning to point out a fact, that we don't have the right to kill unborn babies. These kind if reasonings are the same reason why we have the society, the law and the system. So don't view it as some kind of trash opinion, that's a disgrace.
1
-
Again, pal you're not thinking.
If we applied the same kind of idiotic reasoning as such just because some people want it for all the wrong reasons then it should be legal, we would've still have slavery in the country. Think about that for a second.
This isn't a debate on whether a product is banned or not. This a debate about whether do we uphold the value of human rights. Including the rights for the unborn, and by the way, the unborn is also one of the most important things to Lincoln when he decided to take a war against slavery. "Not just about freeing millions born into bondage, but also for millions others to come". Think about that, really hard.
When you base your entire argument on the case that because many said it, it's automatically true. You're giving up yourself into mob ruling and destroying democracy, which is a thing that can only work when it's based on logic provided by well educated leaders and electorates.
If you think that my reply is too far fetched, I recommend that you spend the time to really read the entire reply. Your way of thinking, is wrong, and maybe it doesn't seem much, now, but that way of thinking, without control, can destroy our entire society, like what's going on right now with mob ruling all over the place? Clear? And don't try to steer the debate, kid. Corruption isn't a part of the system, it's a part of human nature, or any nature, because we're imperfect creatures. So either actually think of actual solutions , or shut up and let the actual people fighting for the country do their jobs.
FINALLY, AGAIN, IT'S NOT A RIGHT TO VIOLATE OTHERS BASIC RIGHTS.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, this is sickening, a bunch of idiots intoxicating the mind of young men, come on, what happened to your careers? Teaching about consent, that's just a pathetic attempt to advocate false feminism. If she goes along, that's consent, it's a moment of 2 souls fusing with each other, these morons are looking to somehow "legalized" it. Even though they have no knowledge of laws or trials on how perjury works. For example, the idiot in purple shirt just say that somebody could accuse you without giving verbal consent, yeah, they can't. They can try, but they'll fail. It's only viable if they give a verbal discontent. Pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's over, children. The only reason it was upheld was because it was a "tax", shockingly, zero penalty means zero tax, means no tax. If it's not a tax anymore, the previous case in 2012 stands firmly.
Cry me a river.
The people who paid for that whole thing but never got a dime is furious. You can't keep stealing from us.
Idiots.
People who enjoy Obamacare are either stupid, or they're intentionally robbing the nation. And most of the times, the people who use it are both stupid and are committing theft. Either way, the law is gone, without you oppressing the working people into buying that horrible product, it will eventually go away by the law of nature. No government intervention, the bad products shall be removed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chr900 Yeah, pal, nice distraction. When you don't know anything, just list a bunch of names so that your opposition have to do the research for you, right?
Certain, link, just one report saying the "catastrophy" in 10 years, it's consequences, directly, where? Each of those organization has dozens of reports, pick one, give a link, which part of that report that justify your claim. You can't use name dropping with people who are smarter than you.
Give out a certain link to just one report, you claim to have many, just give out one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That professor is delusional, and this is a real threats. Only delusional people demand things that they have no idea how to do.
Abolish prisons to transform the people, how? Where's the money? How are we gonna transform them ? Rehabilitation center for the riches, celebrities are expensive and only worked for 50% of the patients, so what kind of plans do you have. His answer: Nothing. We can't even have better education system because the students are getting way too stupid, and we're gonna pop up some magic rehabilitation center?
Managing the Immigrants who come in? How, by limiting the amount of immigrants enough to mange, as you know, the number of people are countless and the human resource to mange is limited, the limits we set are called borders. So their arguments for abolishing borders is insane. We are opening our doors, just that the door isn't big enough for all people, and it needs to be that way to that it can be a door and not a completely open side of the house.
And that statement about letting people in will bring them together. THE PEOPLE WHO CAME HERE A CENTURY AGO ARE THE ONES WHO BUILT THE COUNTRY, GUESS WHAT? THERE ARE NO MORE SPACE FOR THAT KIND OF MIGRATION, WHY? IT'S BECAUSE THE COUNTRY RESOURCES ARE LIMITED, AND WE TAKE CARE OF OUR OWN PEOPLE FIRST.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's uncleared, idiot, because the recruitment process is about evaluating people. There isn't any formula, any method, any exact way to do that. 20% number, 80% assumption. How to distinguish between 2 qualified individual, same score, same background, different interests? Can you? What's the criteria, Harvard's criteria is excellence, what is excellence? Don't speak nonsensical crap if you don't understand a thing. People hire their workers based on likability all the time, how do you think they choose people if there are limited slots? Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jayyarbrough9902 First, Ukraine is not a democracy at all. Because in 2014 there is a coup against a Democracy recognized by the United Nations. Furthermore, that government started a civil war of 2 massive Russian origin people.
So you need to go learn some math, little kid, some proper history as well.
Watching your propaganda media is totally not qualified.
Second of all, as Putin has stated and even offered to the US, the Nazi element inside the Ukraine government and the joining of NATO is unacceptable. These two things constitute an attack on Russia and it has the right to retaliate, and it did.
I mean it's really hard to have a conversation with you, a person who has a fundamentally wrong understanding of history, geography, international politics.
So I'll put it simply at this. You need a new world view, a world view that is acceptable to the rest of the world, not the world view made up by the US and then rejected by 70% of global population.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timkebienda1809 No, they do have to fill the census, if they want their numbers to be counted and the number of seat for their states to increase. Which if it doesn't increase because they don't fill it. I don't care.
And this is false news, Department of Commerce will continue to pursue the question, read the latest news.
Plus, what's you're saying is total nonsense.
If they're here legal and are just not citizens, they can fill in the form saying that they're not citizens. Nothing will happen to them, if they're here legal, they will be protected by the law.
But the illegals, who do not exist on the immigrant system because they're here illegally will be affected, and they should be. They're here illegally and need to be removed, their presence broke the congressional seats model, where a bunch of illegals that doesn't exist on the system, control how much congressional seats does a state get. It's called fraud.
Clear, kid. Go back to school, and if you don't understand what's happening with the fraud, go finish school before you type.
1
-
@timkebienda1809 Yes, I do think that the United States Government doesn't know the number of illegals in the country, they don't know where they are, how to get them and what kind of influence they're inflicting on the country. The US government were apparently clueless when they push for that housing for American policy, which led to the 2008 global financial crisis. So yes, they are clueless in many aspect.
Majority of people standing on the street begging for change are Americans, they're white.
Immigrants didn't build this country, the people who built this country comes from the system of the colonies, which is the country at that time, stop typing propaganda.
The amount of taxes can't be determined because the data is too vast. Counting head, yeah, it's not that vast. Either they expose themselves by filling in the citizenship census and get removed, or they have to declare themselves to be non-existent by not participating in the system, not filling in the census and stop faking the right congressional seats. California will loose like 10 seats if it's done properly.
People who doesn't have rights to be here, can not represent in the government. Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Andrew-it7fb When Republican passed it, it was necessary.
You want to know why it's necessary? No vaccine and the pandemic just started about a month.
The Democrats passed it after a year, where there are vaccines, and people starting to go back to work.
See the difference, dummy? Giving you morphine after surgery is called necessary, giving you morphine after you've been discharged for a while is a felony.
So is Biden in control of Congress or not?
Trump complains that he doesn't have control of Congress, he's Trump, outsider, nobody supports Mitch McConnell over Trump, but now Biden's in charge, is there a fraction fighting going on? Who's Biden blaming except himself? He got his whole party behind him, the crook was there for 40 years.
And kid, the supply chain only affects products that actually need a supply chain that you can't control, usually electronics and high tech devices, where you make components overseas.
Exactly what supply chain problem does your local supermarket faces that the government can't solve when they sell food?
Americans are so extravagant that they're making their everyday food in foreign countries now?
Or is it your government so useless that they can't even control the policies to help the "local" supply chain?
You force them to close down without fair cause, you give free money to everybody without any "labor" behind it to compensate for the money. And you wonder why the prices are increasing?
Unlike much of you freeloaders, some people have to work for the money they earned and they don't get free money, but they have to buy the same products that you freeloaders are now taking a large part of supply out of.
Products that you did not labor enough to compensate for.
Sick, isn't it.
1
-
@Andrew-it7fb What rich people was help by giving money to unemployed people?
The March bill is an extension of the 2020 Bill, genius, extension at the absolutely wrong time.
If the government doesn't have control over the economy, the does any of it's policy matters? Quantitative easing, lowering interest rates.
They have been doing that for years, if they all means nothing, then why are they doing it? Or is it those policies mean something, but you are just blind if the government can do something and Biden is doing nothing, then your fantasy is shattered.
People don't want to work? How about stop giving them money for not working? That's why the relief bill extension is stupid.
The Government doesn't have total control, it still has a lot of control. They're paying people not to work, who's forcing them to do that? God?
Again, with every sentence you type, you further proves Biden horrible policies is affecting the economy. Covid is over, pal, people may die from the virus, but the economy activities impact of it is nearly gone, 48 states have lifted restrictions, more jobs are being brought back meaning jobs can be brought back. People can go to work, why aren't they going to work? It has been going on for 3 months, that's 1/4 year, long enough.
Government's role, they're paying people not to work, whose fault is that?
Those studies you mention is what sane people called fake science, completely unprovable, unverifiable claims that idiots pretend as if they're concrete scientific facts, as if they're solid as Newton's 3 laws of physics.
How about you not use make belief study as argument?
Trump time is over, now it's Biden's time, what has Biden done?
If there is no role of the Government in manufacturing the vaccine, why is every "scientific" prediction of those dummy experts turned out to be wrong? They claimed vaccines were 4 to 5 years away, what changed in their predictions?
You think companies are struggling in technology or funding? No, pal, the only thing they're struggling in is testing and data, which can only be done by following the Government regulation of human life. That is why the Chinese and the Russians can develop vaccines quicker than the US, their government controls testing regulations. The only reason the US vaccine can match the testing process and available today.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ap-top-news-infectious-diseases-politics-virus-outbreak-ef4354a02d857ef70190b087eb737986
Of course, you dummies criticize him but you use the results that he delivered.
What happened to "vaccines were 4 years away"? What changed in your prediction if it's based on facts? Here's a clue of how the vaccine research works, kid. You start of with a theory and a sample, this is easy, every country can do it. and then you do testing, you make modification by examining the test results, test again the new sample and do it again until you have the desirable result there's no miracle formula that company just "figured out" by themselves, there's no genius, no breakthrough behind this vaccine, it's just normal research, which can only be expedited by cutting corners, which Trump took a gamble, and it paid off.
Companies don't need US government funding, idiot, big pharma are paying Congressman to cut corners on testing. Which is exactly what Trump did, you are using a vaccine that is developed under his time span in record breaking time. Show some gratitude.
I took Economic Course on the sidelines and realized that it's a hoax taught mostly by idiots like you, who have no idea what real science is. Idiots who suffer no consequences for disgusting actions affecting millions of lives, I'm an Aerospace Engineer, I make mistakes, people die and I may go to prison or loose my job.
You are the idiots who study Economics to do what? Razzle Dazzle unemployed people?
The foundation behind Economics studies are logical thinking and data processing, which you apparently do not have, which makes you taking those courses useless.
You're like AOC, Economics Bachelorette turns Waitress and now a joke.
What entire world is having supply chain issues? Where in the developed world is there inflation like in the US?
Which country is paying people not to work? That policy can be done if there's less people and higher taxes, but no, that's not the US, so no country is facing problems like the US, pal.
They're much smarter, if you want to pay people, at least have a reserve big enough to do so through higher tax and some sort of tyrannical dictatorship on prices.
Nobody is doing this as dumb as Joe Biden, giving people free money and then not restricting prices. Except maybe African countries, but are they your role models?
Most economist have no answer, pal, they're like you, they're morons. They don't have a clue what's causing what and their theory can never be verified or prove.
You see, because you went to an institution that gave you a "degree" and just because you think that the degree means something, that's not the truth.
Most economist solved less problems than a Janitor.
At least a janitor keeps a clean floor, an economist like you, or an overwhelming majority of them can't even keep a balanced checkbooks because that is a useless degree taught mostly by useless people, making you less money than a waitress. Maybe that's why AOC turned to waitressing after her "economic degree"
People who can actually make money with those degrees require more than the child play knowledge they keep in colleges. Usually they have to study more of financial analysis and actually do the jobs has nothing to do with micro or macro economics just to get relationships in the insider trading world.
To solve a problem, you need data, "economists" like you take data from make belief, can not be verified, can not be proven, and they're jokes in the scientific community.
They're rip off versions of the theories people developed in the 1800s, possible late 1900s, they're not new, they're not sane, they're not accurate at all.
So before you brag about your incompetence, I suggest you get back down to Earth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reidb6327 1 good crucial game, dummy. He played average/well in the other 4 games.
But Maxey had a good game 1,2,3, which are some trivial games because they didn't even win those first 2 games.
And then Maxey choked in game 5 and 6, the 2 most important games.
Embiid played 4 games and played well for 2 game, average for one game, and he choked the crucial home game.
So again, you're supposed to play well in the home games. Embiid and Maxey choked at that elimination game. Why are you blaming Harden?
Playing well in games away games and still lose and then choke at home games that you lost is the definition of choking. Because you play well in the unimportant games and achieved nothing.
In that game 6, the one who choked is definitely not Harden. And because you dummies like to criticize Harden choking before by focusing on the one elimination game he didn't play well and ignore the previous 5 or 6 games. The same standard applied here.
Embiid and Maxey choked against the Heat, keep it real, dummy.
1
-
@LS-pv4dh
Harden and Maxey scoring wise is exactly the same for the Miami series, with Harden beating Maxey in both rebounds and assists, scoring 2 points less in average.
And Embiid averaged only 19 points, only one more point than Harden, slightly more rebounds, no where near in assists.
Here are the average of the 3 stars in that Miami series.
Embiid, 19.8 points, 10 rebounds, 2 assists
Harden, 18.2 points, 6 rebounds, 7 assists
Maxey, 20.2 points, 2 rebounds, 3 assists.
So thank you for proving my point. The 3 stars played average in the entire series. With Embiid playing average all the way because he's injured. And Maxey and Harden both having good games and bad games. The difference is when Harden had a good game, they won. When Maxey had a good game, they lost. So it evens out. But the key is at the elimination game, who choked there?
Not Harden, it's Embiid and Maxey.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@James-gq4tb Your legal analysis is on par with Prosecutor Binger, so easily broken that it's just sad.
The law is the law, if there's an exception in the law, it is the exception. Whatever the exception is "aimed at", it is still an exception that applies to all.
Kyle Rittenhouse saw the loophole in the law, it's his right to exploit it.
You see, your feelings of what the law should be doesn't hold any value at all.
The charges of illegal possession were dismissed is the easiest proof that he broke no law. So how about you look at the real facts and not an opinion piece written by idiots just like you?
The law allowing 16 and 17 years old to have guns do not require for them to get hunting license first, so your argument breaks again.
CNN continued to say after judge ruling that it is an "illegal" gun.
That is not up to debate, it's a factual detail more than reasonably listed within the law. That is defamation, pal.
Picking up a book won't help you, pal, you have no logical thinking capability to process what is written in the book.
That's why you and people like you, Mr Binger, is a sad piece of failure.
You're not allowed to give factual statements based your opinion, you claim somebody committed a crime or not, that is a conclusive statement that can be sued because it's a defamatory statement if they're innocent.
Go back to school, little kid, not law school, you're not ready. Go finish high school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@az-wr1lb It's called overvaluing of a company.
Here's a simple explanation, a company is called overvalued when it doesn't have the capability of backing up the value of it's stocks.
The future profit is considered, but it's definitely not as huge as this, because those profits are like 5 years away from being actual profit.
Tesla is not a tech company, it doesn't have sole monopoly over this market, so there isn't valid reason for it to be valued that high.
The principle of buying a stock to gain dividend is that the stock has to be able to deliver back the money you gave out to buy it, just do the math, honey.
Currently, Toyota is paying 3$ of dividend per share, Toyota number of shares is about 3 times of Tesla, so if Tesla has the profit of Toyota, which is 10 to 20 years away, because Toyota profit is global.
Then Tesla would be paying 9$ per share, two times a year, the current price of one share, is 700$, it would take about 40 years for you to recoup.
Clear enough?
The fact that people are still buying this stocks make the stock market questionable. There is no reason to buy it, except in order to push the price up so that you could pass the grenade. Which is the definition of a bubble.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The first time it's not international community because it's filled with colonizers and imperial. In 1948, there's only 50 countries, now there's 192.
See the difference?
Bilateral negotiation in this specific scenario is absurd, because one side is in the position of strength and is killing the other weaker side.
It's not just Israel, Palestinians can handle Israel. It's the unlimited US support, that is what's disgusting here. And that unlimited US support is what has been obstructing peace.
UN Security Council is given mass power to deply peace keeping forces whenever they see fit. This issue is the only matter where the entire world overwhelmingly vote in favor of intervention and the US says no.
Okay? The only matter.
It's not like the Ukraine matter where nearly half the world abstained. On this issues, nearly nobody abstained. They want peace via intervention now.
International Community is the embodiment of mankind, do you get that? Fundemental issues being resolved under one framework of humanity, that's what being supported here. Of course it ran into a lot of troubles since there's one big bully obstructing everything, but that's going to come to an end, whether you like it or not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SHAMSHAM1090 Yes, you seem to believe the fantasy that the presence of a "family" makes no difference whatsoever in a person's development.
Well, you must be from California, people there is stupid to the bones. Even in the time of slavery, black children still grew up with their father and mother.
That did a thing or to.
First off, a stable household has to be a "family" first. The first sign of an unstable family, parents with the commitment level of teenagers. Get pregnant, instead of turning your lives around, just get an abortion, what could go wrong.
Go back to school, little child.
Places ridden with crimes, all Democrats Cities, those pro "choice" policies didn't make miracles? Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Portland, such "paradise".
1
-
1
-
Okay, so this is pathetic. Hey morons, I'm gonna give out a few simple reasons and see if any of you delusional idiot could actually go against. First of all, the entire video barely mentioned any political arguments. She claimed that she read a book and then they went on a rant about how they, actually "think" when they're 18. Here's why we say she doesn't read books. She doesn't know math, she calculate the budget for her 3.3 trillions dollars plan per year by saying that we could dismantling the entire army, raising taxes critically, hoping that smart and rich people would be like puppies following her stupid orders. Yeah, so that's our most simplistic arguments against her, try to argue against that. Millenials delusional generation, here's an rousing call to all of you. Go get a job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump is a man of facts and reasons, it's just that he doesn't know how to translate those things into words. It's understandable, he's a businessman, discussing in closed rooms, strong language. But whoever suggested this interview should be fired immediately, if that person not a spy then he or she must be stupid with media relationship.
That interview, even though is a despicable attempt to lower the President's credibility, worked. Trump's answers weren't clear, because he got flustered with framing questions all over. Those lying reporters need to be confronted, if this were Putin, he would've destroyed them like he did with Megyn Kelly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Wordsalad69420 I don't know what to tell you, buddy. Those economists are unqualified amateurs.
Maybe they're representative of the American people, highly ignorant. Tariffs are available everywhere, you just don't know it, ignorant Americans, etc. if it's bad, then everybody must play by the same rule, but unfortunately, they're not, China, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea, all of them have some kind of tariffs on foreign goods, now they may call it by different names but the end goal of all of those policies is to reduce consumption of foreign goods that take away domestic industries.
Be more educated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theprofessional1375 Again, pal, no jurisdiction organization can never make a credible "investigation". CNN can't even do a thorough investigation in America, it's quite laughable to think they can do "investigation" in Russia. Get your head out of your ass.
And of course, the Navalny poisoning is another joke, it's laughable because Russia was denied and contact to the investigation, a biased one sided investigation made by the Germans, who's practically American's puppet. They made a claim and then a bunch of request, that's not how investigation works.
Nemtsov assassination happen when he was walking, that I was mistaken about, but again such assassination can not be proven to have any ties with the Russian government. Your whole rant about "surveillance camera" and Kremlin camera is total conspiracy theory. Where is this source? Any link? Anything?
You again mistaken the Crimea situation. nobody installed a government to hold a referendum, the same parliament of Crimea that was voted on before the 2014 coup in Kiev voted to install Aksyonov as the Prime Minister and that some parliament voted for the referendum. Was that vote "fair"? Nobody knows, because there's no footages inside the building, it has the same credibility with the vote to remove Yanukovych in Kiev a few weeks ago, when protestors broke into the parliament of Ukraine and cut off all communication.
You can't just recognize coup you like and ignore coup you don't like, pal. Troops might have been there since February 20th, but they never made a move until there was a coup in Kiev. So blame the coup in Kiev, Putin was masterful at predicting the events, wasn't he. The Westerners think they can just back a coup in the capital and the minor states or "Oblast" will just fall in line? No chance.
The referendum questions were quite clear, join Russia or stays independent. The people did not choose to stay independent and be a part of Ukraine, they chose to join Russia. It didn't achieve a majority, it achieved a super majority.
Crimea is not a part of Ukraine anymore after that 2014 coup where the impeachment of Yanukovych violated the Ukraine Constitution, after that event, the Ukraine country is under a new ruler that defies the previous constitution, making those previous attachments useless. You can't just chose the coup you like and the abandon the coup you don't like, mate.
Because the removal of Yanukovych was already unconstitutional, any actions the latter follows such event, caused by the ousted of the legitimate President over the entire territory of Crimea, which is Yanukovych, any actions following his impeachment is no longer legal under the Ukrainian Constitution. Again, you can't just violate this section of the constitution and then force the other part onto everybody else.
Zelensky was voted to be the President of a version of Ukraine to no longer include Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. That version of Ukraine does not exist in the Ukraine Constitution. After the coup in Kiev in 2014, those places are no longer part of Ukraine, which makes any claim of Zelensky being a legitimate President under the old Ukrainian Constitution completely voided.
Again, you can't just violate the law where you like and then force other people to follow that same law just because you don't like them. The people who orchestrated the coup should have thought it through before organizing it that way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dev_ilmoon Explanation to your dumb question.
Hunter Biden is a moron, that's why he have self incriminating pictures, and it's not his work laptop, it's just a laptop, like how Hillary uses private e-mails? Hunter Biden uses private computer. And no, it wasn't identified by the sticker, Hunter Biden actually signed onto the order.
And of course, he is a cocaine addict, so what do you expect?
Kid, Cocaine addict sudden energy genius, go back to school and study what it means, pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@heroes8844 Oh, poor child, what's wrong? You're unemployed due to your own stupidity and incompetence?
Pal, that's life, deal with it. Low wages like I said, is due to low level of labor.
And yes, if you're stupid, that's what you get.
The pathetic people like you just love to blame the society instead of actually working. "Eastern countries", pathetic, kid. That's not even remotely true. Eastern countries are where they live the best sort of lives, because despite being poor because you're not going to starve, the food products are always lower than expected, because they're farming oriented, and due to the Eastern family tradition, you're more easily asked for help from relatives. And in the top countries with wealth inequality, the top 20, none of them is in Asia.
The Kim family are con men, documentation fraud and thieves. So yeah, nice covering for criminals.
I never imply taking what I "think" is rightfully mine, there are certain stuff that are rightfully "mine" by the law, you idiot. I'm okay to be rich with what I earned, not what I think I earned, why is logic confusing to you.
If I work and get pay, the payment is lawfully mine, doesn't matter what I think, it's lawfully mine.
Society not forgiving? More like morons are being cowards and don't dare to admit their own incompetence.
Minimum wage? Maybe stop providing just minimum labor?
You don't have the right to kill people because you "feel" disrespected.
And surely other people have the right to say what they think about you, doesn't matter how you "feel"
Is reality too harsh for sjws?
1
-
1
-
@jinjunliu2401 Do you think all rich people are corrupted?
Because you're asking for 100% retribution, even from people who work hard and get to the top, that is the majority.
Reality is not 100% black and white, but it is 90% black and white
What had hurt you so that you assume 100% of the rich is corrupted and undeserving, despite the fact that most of them are more deserving than anybody because they work for it?
And about children being born in rich places, those are their rights, their parents work harder than your parents, sad, by the way, therefore their kids have more. Doesn't matter being born into it. All wealth comes from some source of labour, and as long as the acquisition of that wealth is not illegal, you don't have any basis to criticize them. Don't be a hypocrite.
Arguing for stealing using the reason of corruption despite most of the rich becomes rich by working hard. That is just sad.
Marginal argument, you're taking the 1% of cases to argue for the 100% of cases. It's mathematically wrong and morally wrong.
1
-
@invanorm You keep claiming to have a better argument, sjws, but you can't present any.
That's called stupidity.
Go study Economics, some math, kid, there is more than supply and demand, there is also stupidity and immorality, like you.
Oh, they oppressed me, saying that is much easier than having to do anything. You sickened me, disgusting scumbag. Grow up, get a job.
Present some real argument.
Who oppressed you? Or is it you're stupid?
1
-
1
-
@Drelam You have no point, pal.
Your point on inflation, debunked, your point on in paycheck, debunked again.
It's called logic that if you don't worth more, you don't get paid more.
And nice try flaunting money that can never be verified, that's the last resource when you have no argument. It's a pathetic one.
What are you? Pro-gamer? Bitcoin enthusiast? Yeah, nice try.
Sad child. If you have no argument, I suggest being silent.
Use that over-priced computer to google some propaganda quick, that might save your dignity.
Stop the stealing, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually he has been saying it since 1998.
It happens in 2008, it will happen again, on what we just don't know.
the math is like this, pal, if you have a stone piling on top of another stone, and you keep piling, sooner or later, the tower is going to collapse because of the insufficient base to keep up with a tower that tall.
You can't predict when but you know it's going to fall. Imagine falling from a really, really tall building, you have no idea when you'll die, but you will die when you hit the ground.
the 1998 crisis is falling from 10 floors building, in 2008 maybe 100 floors, the next time, 1000 floors.
It's undeniable logic. Because if you think that you can print as much money as you can, creating value from thin air as you go without consequences, you're messed up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yolo Swaggins Well, first off, they're still illegal, their presence is the crime itself.
The commit violent crime at a lower rate, yes, they are only accountable for less then 5% of the population, but they're still illegal.
If they have no rights to be here, any actions of supporting them being here is against the law, and therefore any consequences that follows such actions are totally preventable.
Morally, the city should be sued if it protects illegal people that commits illegal acts. Every American citizens is considered innocent before committing a crime, therefore a city is not accountable for that innocent citizen. But if a city intentionally assists the presence of illegal aliens, aka, criminal, yes, they should be accountable for the actions of that aliens.
If a prisoner escape from prison and kills someone, the accountability goes to the warden and security at that prison. Think a bit, pal.
They don't commit serious crimes as much but they being here violates the core principle of America. All men are created equal, illegal immigrants put themselves up before legal immigrants.
Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
@willjackson5885 Your argument would be weak, because without the other half of the DNA, there is no baby, it is an DNA of a fictitious baby, but we don't deal with fictitious objects in the real world.
Theoretically, you can create a human being using organic matters in a lab, however, the ingredients used to create that person can not be counted as their "possession" until they combine together.
You need a better argument than that, pal, study real science, you can't make believe these things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidross1839 What irreversible damage? Actual science estimates the sea level will rise by 4 centimeters, none of them dare to say that they understand the phenomenon because they don't. Where's the "research"? Don't make things up, it's called lying.
Healthcare won't be free? You don't hear their chant? "Free healthcare for all", no private healthcare? You want to check how good affordable health care is? Let's see where does people go to operate? US or Canada? Other countries like Denmark or Norway can use those programs because their population is too low, Germany doesn't rely 100% on public healthcare, want to go to China to see how public healthcare is? It's pretty much like a war time hospital, human bodies, alive but are still lying in the waiting room.
Don't lie, pal, green new deal calls for absolute elimination of fossil fuel, which is what airplanes use, that's what car use, and that's what we use to make energy.
If all you can do is deny what was already made a statements and in written documents, go back to school, small time troll. Idiot.
1
-
@davidross1839 Uh, huh, nice try, you can't "have been living", use your brain. I lived in China, and Vietnam, and Norway, one thing for sure is that public healthcare is always worse than private everywhere in the world, if the public is good then there wouldn't be a private, think a bit.
UK, Spain, Portugal, like I said before, population, pal.
I don't promote hate, I promote the truth, you might want to risk your life in the hands of a system that has no sane cause to care for you, we don't. If truly all human are equal, why must some pay more to cover the ass of the people that don't care for any of us?
Nobody goes to Finland for a surgery, top hospital in every country is private. That must knock some sense into your little brain. And the reason they can pay for those programs is because they raise taxes on people, average 40% tax, yeah, real paradise.
You might not make any wealth, therefore don't pay any tax, but we do make wealth, it's our labor and it's our human right to retain most of it, don't be a theft. Get a job.
I don't watch VICE, I come to the video to enlighten a bunch of morons, people charge money, I do it for free, maybe some gratitude would be nice.
1
-
@davidross1839 No, it's you who are mistaken about what the system is doing, drug prices should be lower but that is not correlated with healthcare programs. You're using marginal argument, you're using only a minor aspect of the entire issue, drug prices to cover for ripping people off by forcing them to pay for other people's healthcare with higher taxes. Don't be a hypocrite.
The US does have public healthcare, it's very bad and nobody wants it, that's why people work to get private. And the population thing, here's some math, the more people you have, the more resource you'll need to maintain a standard level of quality, more money, which 50% of the population doesn't pay a dime of. So yeah, study some math.
Insulin cost 10 times more here because there is no regulation on the price of drugs, not because of people not having healthcare, moron. Countless drugs are cheaper in the US comparing to Canada, they just don't make the newspaper front because you idiots don't look. Stop reading propaganda pieces.
Infant mortality doesn't depend on healthcare system either, you moron.
Unless you're stupid, childrens are only taken care of by the hospitals in about 2 days and then they're off to the parents, the answer might be because 50% of this country is lazy ass, just like you, horrible people who neglect their parental duties. You're just making up lies, kid.
And another lie you just created, Rand Paul came to Canada for a specialized hospital mainly focus on the problem which he was facing, not to get a body check or anything else. So yeah, if you want hernia repairing, go to Canada.
But Thoracic surgery, cancer research, brain surgery, in the top 10 of the world, about 4-5 are in America.
Stop with the lies, kid, it's getting pitiful.
1
-
@mjackson5912 It's not just narrative, buddy. It's the narrative or worldview of the overwhelming majority of global population.
Why don't you catch up with the civilized world?
If you want proof of intelligence compared to his peers, there are proofs of that. SAT scores, etc, etc, proof of exceptional thinking and writing ability.
And it's unbiased because you seemingly can not point a "biased" view of his. He doesn't exclude any evidence or argument, only you are doing that. Leave the serious talk to the pros, buddy, because you're not just unqualified, you're just not up to par.
But go ahead, I'll humour you. What argument would like to pose for Finkelstein?
I'm sure it will be of such a low quality that even i can wreck your argument entirely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@objectivethinker3225 Hey, you completely subjective thinker. Yes, they will use the exact same labour to manufacture things in the US. If you actually know anything, the workers there are much, much more productive than the ones in the US. They're not just cheaper, they're cheaper and better. This is why education is very important, so you go get one. It's worldwide consensus that American labor are actually among the least productive ones worldwide.
The current labour input cost is between 12$ and 25$, you move it here and it will jump between 40-100$, and again, that's not the only increase, there's an increase in labour cost in every component that you want to manufacture in the US. And of course, an increase of 40-100 USD on the price of an Iphone, nearly 10% for absolutely no gain whatsoever for the consumers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@objectivethinker3225 I don't know how naive you are but that's not how productivity is ranked and especially not in manufacturing. Whatever they were able to automate has already been automated, so homie, don't be desperate.
US manual labor workers are the least productive on Earth. Again, you need a much better education.
Exactly what productivity do you think the US workers have over the Chinese workers? Especially in manufacturing and assembly? Creativity? Buddy, that's adorable.
And yes, the price difference of Teslas in the US and China does depends on currency strength, which means that paying the same labor in dollar is much more expensive than in Yuan, leading to Teslas made in China is a lot cheaper. Exact same car, same software, same hardware, cheaper price.
So thank you for admitting your own ignorance, pretty bold move. Daddy Elon taught you well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@objectivethinker3225 If you mean the videos posted on YouTube 10-12 years ago, which are films of factories built 20-30 years ago, yes, back then there was a significant difference.
Now, homeboy, the Chinese factories are much, much , much more advanced than the US steel factories, if there even exist US steel factories. They just don't post that on YouTube, because they don't use YouTube, they also have their own internet companies, much faster payment system, faster transportation, better buildings, and better factories.
You can look at the infrastructure built in a city up somewhere on a mountain and it will be far better than the latest infrastructure built anywhere in the US.
And of course, this is spelled out for you also by daddy Elon. Come on, homeboy, you need a better education, pronto.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@echos5823 Depends on civilian and military casualties. You attack an "electrical" factory, a fuel depot, cute, but nothing massive.
You try to invade major city, 100 thousand people and more, people who are now recognized as Russians, there will be different consequences.
Lyman is not a "key town", it's an extremely small town, holds about 0.3% of Donetsk total population, most of which are evacuated already, it holds no key economical features, it's a wasteland. Russian troop is outnumbered so they decided not to keep the city.
Ever wonder the Americans are scared to give Ukraine long range missiles?
You are not allowed to attack Russian territory. Even when you tried, they only dared to attack a power plant, that's not even a considerable attack.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@erinl504 No, they don't contribute much to Korean Economy, stop making things up, BTS is not the Hallyu Wave, a wave, if you had learned physic, is a movement of matter. They're taking advantage of the wave created by dozens of idols before them, the US market is just so easy to fool because they have nothing around. Nobody came to Korea to see BTS, why? Because BTS isn't at Korea for most of the year, there, no tourism value, they don't know anything about Korea through BTS, so nothing again. They know Korea through movies, variety shows, those are the real waves. People who choose touring destination by hearing name of music groups and not doing any research at all, are not plenty at all. So your argument crumbled, pathetic!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, those people want to join Russia, and those lands belong to those people, are originally of Russia.
Sorry darling, harsh truth. If each individual is given the right to born, to live and to decide the fate of their homeland, then by default, if overwhelming majority of them wants to give their homeland to somebody else, they can. Hence a referendum.
Was it a fair referendum, probably not. Was the coup in 2014 a "fair coup"? Also probably not. Trying to claim moral superiority here is just adorable, no side is correct, no side is righteous, each side just have different interest.
Grow up.
1
-
@Stefan No, no, those people want to join Russia, with their lands and home in tact.
They don't just want the nationality, they want the nationality and the ability to live at their home, on their land, at that location. Oops
And of course Chechnya is the same thing, it didn't sought indepedence, a faction within it sought independence and that faction got defeated. They are now of Russia.
The same thing sort of happened when 11 states seceded from the American Union and what happened? You fought and defeated the "faction", didn't you? Why can't Russia do the same to Chechnya?
Study real history, kid, you'll see it's a whole grey area.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
Oh come on, it's a big joke. Chaz 2.0
Doomed to fail, the military will cut off water, electricity, food supply. They'll starve and fight each other first.
If you want to start a revolution, do it right, gun blazing and forming real territory zones.
The military have seized control of Myanmar, they are now the governing body, they don't plan to mistreat or enslave any citizens.
Maybe if the people there paid less attention to false freedom and more attention to technological research, they might achieve something.
Building an illegal barricade means you're declaring war, forming your territorial zone. It's a war where one side has all the weapons and one side has just fireworks but it's still a war.
If you can't handle the consequences, don't start it.
It's not a protests if you form your territory and barricade, it's then a revolution, a poorly prepared revolution, but it's still a revolution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aw0oooooo That's because such quote is a key opinion of an individual sitting in that room, the qualified individual. The quote is about Zionism evil nature and it's surrounding context. It's not about the quote, buddy, learn to look at the big pictures.
You people are just so crude it's kind of sad.
For the ICJ part, that is the initial ruling, there is plausibility of Israel comitting Genocide. There is no case of the US committing genocide in Iraq, there's no case of that in VIetnam or Afghanistan.
There isn't even a case of Russia committing genocide in Ukraine.
But there is one now about Israel. Plausibility standard is a very high standard that the most significant conflicts of the last 70 years have failed to reach.
Look, pal, if you're ignorant about this, there's nothing wrong of admitting. Nobody will blame, nobody expect you to be competent, by nature, you're most likely to be mediocre and uninformed.
Why don't you show a little bit humility and stop pretending as if you know stuff that you don't know?
1
-
@aw0oooooo That's because such quote is a key opinion of an individual sitting in that room, the qualified individual. The quote is about Zionism evil nature and it's surrounding context. It's not about the quote, buddy, learn to look at the big pictures.
You people are just so crude it's kind of sad.
For the ICJ part, that is the initial ruling, there is plausibility of Israel comitting Genocide. There is no case of the US committing genocide in Iraq, there's no case of that in VIetnam or Afghanistan.
There isn't even a case of Russia committing genocide in Ukraine.
But there is one now about Israel. Plausibility standard is a very high standard that the most significant conflicts of the last 70 years have failed to reach.
Look, pal, if you're ignorant about this, there's nothing wrong of admitting. Nobody will blame, nobody expect you to be competent, by nature, you're most likely to be mediocre and uninformed.
Why don't you show a little bit humility and stop pretending as if you know stuff that you don't know?
1
-
@aw0oooooo That's because such quote is a key opinion of an individual sitting in that room, the qualified individual. The quote is about Zionism evil nature and it's surrounding context. It's not about the quote, buddy, learn to look at the big pictures.
You people are just so crude it's kind of sad.
For the ICJ part, that is the initial ruling, there is plausibility of Israel comitting genocide. There is no case of such in Iraq, there's no case of that in VIetnam or Afghanistan.
There isn't even a case in Ukraine.
But there is one now about Israel. Plausibility standard is a very high standard that the most significant conflicts of the last 70 years have failed to reach.
Look, pal, if you're ignorant about this, there's nothing wrong of admitting. Nobody will blame, nobody expect you to be competent, by nature, you're most likely to be mediocre and uninformed.
Why don't you show a little bit humility and stop pretending as if you know stuff that you don't know?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There's a limit to how many targets human can engage at one time, the machine can engage thousands of targets at once.
Meaning that if a human error is about 50%, at most in a day, a human officer can give out kill list order to 10 people, which means out of those 10, only 5 are killed by mistakes.
But with a machine, let's say the error is about 20-30%, but it engages 1000 targets a day, then it literally killed 200-300 people by mistake in a day.
Please go study actual mathematics.
And furthermore, there's absolutely no guarantee that the standard used to tune the machine is even an acceptable standard for military conduct. What happens if the standards used in the machine turns out to be illegal?
If the machine was tuned to committ war crimes, the scale of war crimes increases exponentially.
Don't you get it, buddy? Go get a proper education. You have lost touch with your humanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WolframaticAlpha The same thing happened in America with your The Great Recession. Economic crisis that are caused by the imbalance between supply and demands, as well as bubbles always happen. But the "debt ceiling" is nothing like that. Actually, it is that, but it's much more severe, because unlike the companies in Japan who dared to cut spending and paid of their debt with real money, real labor value.
America has nothing like that, you've committed into a trap. More and more social services, with zero way of recouping the money.
In the lost decade or the Great Recession, what happened was a bubble of overvalued assets that led to too much debt being accumulated for assets that are not worth that much. However, those crises happened to companies, which led to a reduction in economic activities. This is different, in this case, America itself is a company, a company that serves the American people, for a rate of 100% continuously loosing money. America have overvalued it's own people. The American population wellbeing doesn't worth the money the government is giving them, because the American population, overwhelming majority of them do not contribute back enough.
And you can not cut the spending because it's too late, the money you've already wasted on social services to unworthy people can never be recouped. And to continue those policies shall just keep sending you into the abyss.
Normal countries have debt to pay for something that is actually solid and exchangeable, America waster their debt entirely.
Unlike a company that took on debt for a shot of gigantic revenue later. In Japan, the government took on debt to rebuild their infrastructure, which are used and paid for everyday by the Japanese people, it's a solid source of revenue. The American people have used their debt to give out free healthcare, which just waste the money entirely because once the healthcare is used, it's gone.
1
-
@WolframaticAlpha No, pal, you're confusing stability with temporary quietness.
There has been no crash due to social spending because massive social spending has only been a thing since Lyndon B Johnson formed Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. What we are suffering now is the result of such stupid action, this is the first wave of the consequences.
Somebody tried to ride a car off a cliff to jump to the Moon, even though there's no "precedent" of that happening because nobody was dumb enough to try it, by logic, we can still see that it's a stupid and bound to fail action. This is what US social spending is like. Spending money you don't have, and are never going to have, increasing the debt not by billions or dozens of billions, but by hundreds of billions every year.
I'm not comparing the current situation to the cause of the 2008 Recession, so your entire paragraph there is useless. I'm comparing how you have reacted to the 2008 Recession, and how such reaction can never be done in this current situation.
In 2008 Recession, America bailed out the banks, so that the Banks could live and regain their lost profits by doing business off the loans.
Unfortunately for America, when America fails, their regressing population can never regain what they have wasted off. The money they've wasted is too much, it's now too late.
Cutting social spending is the only way to save money, you can't make money out of thin air, so therefore not to overspend, you have to cut your spending. Don't confuse stability with temporary quietness. In Norway, there is some sort of stability, because low population, enough productive people to cover their asses.
In America, not so much, gigantic of population, overwhelmingly unproductive people. Mandatory spending by law that makes no sense. You have temporary quietness for a while, but now it's going to burn.
There's no such thing as "pure capitalism" or "pure socialism", and that's not the argument the point is that this plan is pure stupidity. Even in a "socialist" state, you can only spend what you have. The Americans are spending what they don't have at an alarming rate without plans to ever recoup.
Norway or Japan model shall give them about 50 to 70 years before they face a "debt crisis". America shall face that crisis within the next decade or so, because as American population grows less competent, the money America committed to spend increases heavily. Like I told you, it's a trap, no country in the world dared to behave this stupidly. It's not just the social spending, it's the "reckless" social spending.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you go by that standard since the pre-modern time, the most disgusting country on Earth is the British.
You know, that tiny island that claimed 25% of global landmass as their lands, the place where the Sun never sets?
And of course, countless other lists of Empires and aggressive state, including the Swedish Empire, Poland - Lithuanian Commonwealth, Empire of Japan, German Empire (1st, 2nd and 3rd reich), Danish Empire, French Empire, Italian Empire.
Why don't you go study basic history and geography?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kai don't realize that they all looked easy because they were made to look effortless. You know what moves are actually easy, EXO, BTS, all of those boygroup nonsense nowadays. They're aren't doing much, they're doing moves but not actually moving much of the body. EXO Monster is a clear example, the majority of their body doesn't move, they're usually still, 2 factors, the songs are slower and the dance move are easier. A piece of advice, if during a span of 5 seconds, you move 2 seconds and stand still for 3, the time you rest is more than the time you dance. Dance that really cost your stamina, TVXQ and 2PM.
large body movements and jumping up and immediately down, always moving.
They look intense because they were choreographed to look like they're intense but in countless form, male dance are way easier due to types of action required to appeal masculinity or femininity.
Here's a clue, when there's a slide move, female has to slide with their body straight while men can crunch down. The male version looks more intense but it's actually way easier. When the female slides, the other leg has to endure the entire body weight lifting up and down, but when men slides, because they're already bending down, they don't have to bend again.
Example, EXO dancing king.
Do some actual dancing, pal.
Spinning isn't the hard part, physic wise, the hard part is minimal body movement to show effortlessness in dance moves, that also decrease the body capability of generating strength, and that's only happen with female dance.
1
-
@iheartTH1203 They didn't move their entire body, I don't know what kind of lies you're trying to make, pal. They only moved some parts while the other parts were still, here's a clue, when you're turning your arms and your upper body subsequently turns with it, it's not turning your upper body.
Kai can spin, it requires balance, but sorry, not stamina, female ballerinas spin way more than Kai, want to check that out?
Twirling when not actually moving much of the body requires more stamina, kid, because they still moves the necessary part of the body but requires to move them back immediately after moving them.
Groundbreaking? If you're just referring to how male dance are always performed with a spreading legs, that's not groundbreaking. One time jumping up and down is way more exhausting than putting hands up or down like in Electric kiss.
Don't lie to yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@samuelgrueti4643 Probably the Soviet couldn't have won that war without the Allies, the same way the Allies couldn't have won it without the Soviets.
Buddy, your country was fighting with the Nazis like a bunch of cowards, don't try to hide it, buddy. Your country is not a major factor of that war. Now your country jumped ship a bit too late, it's recognized by literally everyone on Earth that Romania was still a part of the Axis after the biggest German defeat, which is Stalingrad, so buddy, of course the Germans didn't commit war crimes against you, you were fighting with them. And the Soviets didn't do much against you until they've already won in Stalingrad. Like I said, they comitted war crimes after they've won the war, not during the war. Meaning that the argument it's necessarry to commit war crimes to win a war is a meaningless argument.
I know that you're very much ashamed of your country history, but you have no way of changing reality, I suggest go get a proper education
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Look, the record company paid for the production of your song, and what they get is the ownership to the masters. Creating directly replicating products against the original masters is just very disrespectful.
Taylor Swift was an employee that was employed by Big Machine Records, her work, paid for by them is owned by them. Now she utilized a loophole in the contract to create replicating products that she can own, but nobody does that. It's bad manners.
It's like this, if you hire somebody to design you a proprietary product which you plan to sell. Right after they design you that product, they sold the product to your competitor, or in this case, they just make the product themselves.
You see how wrong that is? That is unacceptable business conduct. You does that in any professional company in technical field, it's called violation of patent. And if you think patents are not important, it's what that saved your life from Covid. Without the protection from patents of invention, no company would dare to take a risk on developing new products, one of those field is medicine, most recently the vaccine.
What Swift did is creating a precedent that record company shall never make the mistake of again. They can't allow sole ownership of the song composition to the writers because very easily the entire song can be re-recorded and then brought to compete with the original recording.
What she did was not empowering, or inspiring, it's legality exploitation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Cyzs66 You need to stop taking your sources based on their organization names. If they do not disclose their methodology, their data pool, then whatever organization they are, their claims are just claims. Unverifiable, untrustworthy.
So at least that claim has no basis. You found the wrong information. Go there, visit the place, talk to the people in multiple regions, you'll see. None of them wants war with China, meaning that by default reunification is the only way, because that island for the last 4000 years has been an inseparable part of mainland China, they share the same language, customs, history.
1
-
@biswaroopmaiti2943 I don't think you know anything about that region history, little buddy.
Chinese and Vietnamese are not the same people, the Vietnamese people have a significant amount of independence in the last 1000 years, 7-9 times defeating invasion of the Chinese Empire. They are very closely related in terms of customs and traditions but they're 2 separate people with their own distinctive writings, languages, cuisine.
China was ruled by the Mongols for the less than 200 years, and by the Manchus in less than 200 years, and in both of those reigns, the Chinese Han people were still the overwhelming majority of the population and their custom remains the dominant customs.
The Manchus that ruled China were turned into Chinese, the same with the Mongolians that tried to rule China, they adopted Chinese customs and abandoned their original customs.
Go learn some history, you're wildly ignorant about this and it's just sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@finwefingolfin7113 Buddy, that's not how scientific research works
Scientist don't just work on one single paper in a project at a time.
At the time of Schon publication, Bao, Kloc and evnen Battlog were doing their own things, they have their jobs and their own projects, it's just that among their projects, there's the collaboration with Schon.
That's why Schon is the main author of the paper. Kloc and Bao provided samples, not samples grown because of the project that requires tremendous work, they provide samples that Schon ask them to provide accordingly.
Battlog is a supervising to an entire division with multiple scientists, not just Schon. When you have an actual scientific job, you'll start realizing how you don't have enough time to pay great attention to every single project, because it's impossible, both time wise and expertise wise.
And it's not breakthrough science, that's a meaningless term, what Schon did was claiming breakthrough discovery, meaning discovering and seeing stuff that is already there but was never observed before due to lack of research. That doesn't require much funding, the crystals are grown by Kloc or Bao, what Schon did was doing the measurements.
1
-
@Lady Mercy 2 logic fallacies, if everybody can just pursue their passion, nobody's passion will be followed. You have one hundred writers, that's limited amount, that's the dream, but a million writers? Just massive unemployment.
The reason people follow their "passion" is also because it's a selective route and only people with the most determination, gift, can overcome hardship as such having to work, to make money, and then to go for their dream. Allowing everyone to follow their dreams is like saying free money, do whatever you like. In case you're a moron, that will destroy people. Humanity is destined to be separate, inferior and superior, if you don't think it exists, go to San Francisco. Get out of the bubble. Working environment is the way of man to sort out, people who get lost doing something they don't want to and people who can strive to be better, do what they want.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think you get it, dummy. Israel doesn't have a right to exist in the first place, because they stole those lands illegitimately by force and oppressed people to keep them.
And again, kid. They're not Jews, they're fake Jews. That small Zionist states are not religious, they don't follow the most sacred teachings of that religion, and you need to stop insulting the us true Jewish people by claiming that evil nation as a representative of us.
They're not Jewish, they're Zionist, and they're not under any danger, they are the occupiers, the invaders, the aggressors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because others are unprofessional and can be forgiven with their lack of knowledge, with Kai, it's just pure arrogance, you know what dance is easy, Love shot and a bunch of modern boy group, that's the easy ones, girl group dances never seemed to back down but boy group has declined very much, TVXQ dance, those are tiring, Super Junior dance, that is tiring.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@huntersw2 That video is surprisingly easy to debunk, kid.
Just because most of the cities are run by Democrats doesn't mean that there aren't Republican run cities.
It's not who run the cities, it's the policy you implement within that cities. And every Democrats run cities, never asked for federal help.
Why isn't there any riots at Republican states where they asked for federal help?
And pal, percentage wise, here is when you have to learn actual math.
Percentage means nothing if you compare drastically different scale of the city.
Anchorage is much, much, much less developed than Chicago, so a higher percentage in Anchorage doesn't represent the same thing as it represent Chicago. You have to compare samples from the same scale cities.
And of course, these Democrats run cities are responsible for the riots within the last 3 months.
So if you're talking about data, using the data of everything before the last 3 months to talk about what was happening during the last 3 months is again pretty stupid.
Next time, pal, search for real information.
Republicans intellectuals destroy these nonsense for breakfast.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@huntersw2 Nice try, kid. Again with the bad math.
Like I pointed out, individual crime is not the point here.
It's the gang violent crime, it's the riots.
So instead of ignoring the argument and rely on bad mathematics, why don't you go back to school and learn some math?
This is not disagreeing about something trivial, kid, you're messing with human lives. Lives that could have been saved.
Like I pointed out, murder in the last weekend. Chicago vs Jacksonville.
Learn some math, okay?
What other factors led to rising gang violence?
"It's the summer?"
Is that your nonsense here, the denial of federal help and deny of prosecution to rioters are small factors the rising in gang violence and rioting?
Really?
Like I said, learn some math. This argument of yours is beyond pitiful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goofygoober6211 Fetus means little child in latin, kid.
Go get a dictionary. Yes, I do believe that most women who do that are murderers. Hundreds of thousands of kids stuck in the foster system actually has a chance of making it. They're still alive.
Unlike millions who got stuck in the abortion system, they're like "dead".
I'm not a hypocrite, you are.
You see, there are rankings to rights, before living condition, comes the more important one. The right to live, you strip away that right from children. While the living condition problem is due to lack of resources, your problem is just about choice.
and children at the border are classified as minor criminals, pal. Those "cages" are called jail cell, they committed crimes when they were illegally crossing the border, but hey, they're still alive.
You want to go to an abortion clinic and checks out countless human remains of countless abortions? There are bones, skulls and torso.
Everybody picks what they believe to be morally right and wrong, kid. This society pick the value much more closely resemblance to mine than yours, and we're going to throw you barbarians overboard.
We civilized people deemed that doesn't matter how uncomfortable their living condition can be, not that uncomfortable, they're living way better than countless children in Asian countries. We deem that such a life is way better than death.
I know it sucks to you barbarians but we don't care about your feelings.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's not how company works, pal, stock price is not stronger company, the company stays the same, the stock you have already issued is being traded, the money in the stock aren't theirs, if they're out of money, and they issued new stocks to get more money, the price will fall, and people bubble will burst.
If the price of stock goes up while they're doing nothing, it means those stocks aren't backed by anything. If your company is defined by stocks, it's crazy, it's how your company is that will impact the stocks.
Analyst can't predict the future, it's really difficult because people buy and sells on a delusion now. But there's a rule, things not backed by anything, can fall easily as it's made.
Tesla the stocks is rising, but Tesla the company is not. That's your bubble.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stubbwinkley4015 The discussion is not about trans people or surgery, pal. That's not the discussion. That's why you need more math, you're short sighted and ignorant.
The discussion is about whether these lunatics, not regconized by an overwhelming majority of the global population, somehow is confusing the acceptance of them by some to mean that they have some kind of authority over the rest of us.
That's the discussion. There's no such thing as trans people, there are people who are comitted to recreational activities that call themselves "trans people". They're just people, and that recreational activity of theirs are just recreational activities, subjected to social regulation, such as golfing, skydiving, weed smoking. The extreme nature of such recreational activities doesn't change one bit the nature that they're recreational activities. Or at least it's recognized as such, and there's no sort of proof of any kind to suggest otherwise.
It's a bit complicated without understanding basic logic, and I suggest you go learn some math to familiarize yourself with this. Cool?
1
-
1
-
@stubbwinkley4015 It's not about "trans people", whatever that means, but for now I'll classify it the way a few billions people on this Earth classify them. They're a bunch of people who took part in extreme recreational activities. Nobody cares what they do to themselves, they can cut off their limbs and identify as "limbless people" as well for all I care.
What we care about is their overreaching, infringing, illegal activities concerning to children, and their lunatic justification for it, claiming something that no meaningful organization of authority accepted. That somehow there is such a thing as "trans people", that it's not a recreational activity but a trait decided from birth that require immediate medical intervention. That's total nonsense and is accepted by no authority, at least no democratic governing authority in the United States, and at minimum 90% of the number of countries on Earth do not accept that as well.
The lack of forbidding of such activity doesn't mean that it's protected by the law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you lived in China for only 2 years, you're worse than a tourist, you're an ignorant person who probably didn't know that much about anything that matters. You came, you didn't do anything significant and you left.
High speed train doesn't come from Japan or the US, kid, being the first one to make it doesn't give you sole ownership over it, they've studied your old technology and they've surpassed you, except for the current Japanese trains, they're the world leaders on this. But on the matter of volume of trains built at a low cost, the Chinese are the unequivocal leaders. And homie, I guarantee that the number of experts, engineers, smart people there, even that accounts for just 5% of the population there, that's more than enough to outweight the number of equally smart people in North America and Western Europe combined.
You're living in a fantasy, go to any University in the Western world, any of them, the best students, the best faculty members, at least 50% of them are Asian and possibly 10% of them are Chinese. The same with any large tech companies, maybe even more.
You have this weird delusions about your own signifance based on nothing but bad Hollywood movies. Keep up with the time
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheStupidWaffle No, that's what you've been trying to lie.
Kid, read the actual report, don't listen to fake news.
Here's what actually happen, Trump withheld an aid to Ukraine first, because he has the authority to withheld aid to a nation that he deemed troubling.
And then he calls the President of that country to ask him to take care of that problem, which is corruption within the system. Joe Biden admitted on tape that he interfered with the removal of a prosecutor, which in the call with Trump, the President of Ukraine also says that he is looking into that unlawful removal.
So what you have is a corrupted guy, aka Biden, he admitted it, and Trump asked the President of Ukraine to investigate corruption, which the President of Ukraine also acknowledge that Biden is a part of it.
Pal, it's not Trump's fault that Biden is corrupted and accidentally be his political opponents, Biden admitted it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@schwaaard That's because the idea is being executed poorly by a bunch of incompetent people. If a person can't do math properly, is the fault lies in math? or the fault lies with the person?
And no, your argument is absolutely wrong, because you can use statistics to summarize whether having a certain attributes such as gender, race, actually means that candidate will have a higher probability of facing adversity, providing you're doing it correctly. Most people are doing it the wrong way, doesn't mean that the methodology is wrong.
DEI has always existed in human civilization, what, you think that's some new term never thought of before? Treating people as a whole, including their background, their story, not just one indicator of merit has always been around. Go study real history. Looking at the whole picture of human beings, that concept has existed at least since the ancient Egyptians.
I'll do an example for you in the case of Joel Embiid.
The reason why they even set up a scouting place in Cameroon in the first place is because they've applied the DEI spirits, on lowering the standard of minimum requirement of official competition result to set up a scouting location, based on the situation of the country.
A poorly connected country, no organized basketball, players with far lower ability, but because of the socio-economic factor of the place, their "merit" indicated via official competition results was ignored. Contrary to places like in China, etc.
In case of Joel Embiid, they did say that because he's Cameroonian, never played basketball till he's 15, his lower quality skillset can be put aside and judge him completely different from how they would judge a black kid in America playing basketball from when he was a kid.
You're intentionally twisting, lying about an idea and then pretend as if your version, which is full of lies are the official version. Get over yourself.
Nobody judges one applicant solely based on one single criteria, you're making that up. What's actually happening is that they're judging multiple criterias and in those multiple criterias, race and gender plays a role in deciding the final result.
Another easy example, if an Asian kid and a black kid, same middle class background, no noticeable difference in every single category, by statistics, the black kid will be more talented than the Asian one academic wise, because statistically speaking, unfortunately black middle class families are usually less educated, or has a less impressive education. You need to deal with that reality, now does that principle means that it will be right every single cases? No. But it will be right in a majority of cases providing a large enough number of samples.
DEI was exactly why Joel Embiid was found, because the DEI spirit is about looking at the whole picture. If they had just applied a crude merit approach, they would have said that this guy has never played basketball in his life, he's horrible compared to his peers who started basketball earlier, he's not good enough.
DEI spirit focuses on the actual merit of human beings, what you're focusing is not merit, it's crude and false version of what is called merit.
1
-
1
-
@schwaaard Go study some statistics, hombre. Of course from some attributes, you can extrapolate the probability of something being true or not. For example, on average, Asian househoulds are more educated than Black, White, or Hispanic households, meaning that any kid born into an Asian family has a head start on all of the other kids, and therefore his or her potential and "merit" has to be judged with that head start in mind.
Like if 2 F1 cars race each other and one car has a 1km head start, if you don't take into account that head start factor, you can't compare the performance of the cars.
Now will it be right on every case, this statistics based approach? No, but it will be right on a majority of cases, provided that it's done properly, meaning correctly identifying the proper head start amount, and that's very difficult to do and most schools and doing it horribly. But that's the school fault, not the idea's fault.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fake News, people, not news but pretending to be news, therefore it's fake news. Any of you moron would like to debate? I'll provide some free knowledge down at the reply section. The same kind of knowledge that even Yale students can't seems to get. The first thing, if you have no proof, no real information , no witnesses, you can't just accused somebody and then demand it be taken seriously, it's called stupidity. Somebody accused that Obama is actually Bin Laden protege, he saw them exchanging words, plans and Obama supporting 9/11. But nobody believed that guy, so use your brain and apply the same kind of logic here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrGoodguy1340 What facts, idiots, you have been lying about the facts.
1. They don't come in legally
2. When they come in illegally, they committed a crime, asylum or not, they disqualified themselves, and that's when they're criminal, the children shouldn't be put with criminals.
3. A lot of these children didn't come with parents, they came with strangers, criminals requiring fake kids to get in because individuals without family is not under harsh circumstances. They fake the family. Look at the stats.
4. Federal prisons toilets, like in these facilities, have the sink right above the toilets, you can't drink from the toilet, there's a sink right there, think a bit.
5. If you're a troll, go back to MacDonald.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, that's not how it goes. The Article of Impeachment cited bribery but they can not impeach him based on bribery, they have no proof at all of bribery.
Professor Dershowitz explained this, abuse of power is a loose term that can not be defined. Bribery is a crime that can be impeached, did they impeach Trump based on bribery? No, they have no proof, so they make up a term, "Abuse of Power", claiming that his actions seemingly is "bribery" is a part of abuse of power, despite not being able to prove it at all, because if they can prove it, they would've impeached him on bribery.
You're arguing for the pathetic side here, pal.
The House impeached him based on bribery, they claim that there "could" be bribery and then because they can not prove it, just leave it there, and use such nonsense to impeached him using "Abuse of Power".
When you cite bribery to impeach for "Abuse of power", you don't need to prove bribery specifically, because "bribery" is not the main impeachment clause. But however, even if they use "bribery" as a "citation", it has already been destroyed by the rest of Trump's lawyer. So yeah, they lost n all grounds.
If they impeached him based on bribery, they has to prove bribery, they can not, they failed to. And if they do make an argument for bribery, it's surprisingly easy to be countered, so they can't do it because they'll be destroyed even more. They have nothing, so they have to make up "Abuse of power", because "Abuse of Power" is a nonsensical term that has been rejected by the founding Fathers, it sounds severe enough to fool the public.
Think about it, lawyer.
1
-
@Blanka1100 Oh, you're adorable. You think that there is an actual country called "Ukraine" in the history of the world.
Let me enlighten you, little buddy. That cesspool of a country never existed in nearly 1000 years of history in the region. NEVER.
It was created out of thin air 100 years ago to be a part of the USSR, and has only been independent, wrongfully so for the last 30 years.
Okay, so unfortunately, the rightful "owner" of those territory, aka, the ethnic people that lives there, reject the nonsense of "Ukraine" claim.
The Eastern part is of Russia, simple history, for the last 1000 years, overwhelming majority of the time, it's under Russian rule. And the Western part of it can be divided and throw to the Polish, the Hungarians and Lithuanians.
Go learn some math and spare us your ignorance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This video is the crap of Prager U, I'm Asian and I'm ashamed. We don't know whether the person in the video is actually Asian, but she doesn't know anything about Asian studying culture.
It's not all but close to all candidates that has Asian roots are not leaders, just followers, they're cramped with knowledge in highschool without developing critical thinking or such.
This video doesn't provide any proof, pretty much like Black Lives Matter. Asians aren't less selected into Harvard or of any school because of their race, otherwise there won't be any Asians left. Only low level students who have Asian roots are crying about this.
I'm Asian and I went to Columbia, origin from Vietnam, went here for College and then stayed here. Anybody who believes that there are racial discrimination against Asian should talk to a qualified Asian.
It's not discrimination based on race, it's discrimination based on characters, personal qualities, which happens to have an entire group of same root people falls in one category, bad.
Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, moron, the video is about power, and total stupidity.
What you're trying to do is admirable but you have no idea how to do it.
Even George Floyd, who was killed, that man is a professional criminal.
So your nonsense of putting a psychiatrist on patrol duty, pathetic.
How can you tell which area will there be crime and which will not?
Are you a clairvoyant? Or you're even much more idiotic that you don't realize that if you remove police in some areas, those will be the perfect place for criminals to thrive?
We saw the video, we saw the stupidity in it as well.
Why don't you tell that to hypocrites in Hollywood? Why they need so much security? You want to remove security from certain areas for baseless reasons, not sane enough, dummy.
1
-
@dillanrojas6434 How about getting money for those programs and keep the police, dummy?
Yes, he hope police will disappear in the future due to better lifestyle. That's why he's a moron, it will never disappear, because human nature is full of flaws, criminals keep existing, doesn't matter how much nonsense treatment you put into it.
How about stop living behind the screen and get back to real life? Visit a maximum security prison, let's see how you treat those people?
The young man who looted, shoot and kill a police officer last week, your policy of "treatment" failed again and again. Pathetic.
You're allocating resources to all the wrong places, because those resources are needed for the police, dummy.
Why don't you use your own money to fund those fantasy treatment and leave the police alone, because unlike your failed programs of treating criminals like they're naive children, the police force actually works.
The first thing is the claim that "police is the tool of violence and social control".
That is pure stupidity, "police is the tool of law enforcement and social security".
Why don't you go to the victims of criminals, all skin color, and ask them if they feel safer when you remove the police and replace them with psychiatrists?
Because psychiatrists can't defend citizens against criminals, clear? Doesn't matter what reason you commit the crime, people still get harm by those crime.
So before you worry for the criminals, how about you worry for the victims of the criminals?
Because those victims will be hurt a lot more before you can help any criminal, clear?
1
-
@seth_deegan That is just pathetic statistics lie. It's taken out of context severely.
More police doesn't lead to less crime, but it sure makes the crime harder to commit, faster reaction time, more safety. Common sense would know that.
Now, let's see, less police does lead to more crime, dummy. See the last week? Police can't do their job due to the pathetic protesters and people happily went out looting, as well as gang violence, just in Chicago.
Done? Dummy, the world is a stable place because there are super powers, the morons at the UN can't handle the simple fact that certain countries will want to spread terror and dominant over other countries, their concept is pathetic and that's why they don't achieve a damn thing anywhere that matters.
You think that the UN is fighting terrorists?
The terrorism in the Middle East existed for hundreds of years, even before Western intervention, you're going to say that less police there will stop them from killing each other and destroy the region ?
Demilitarization? It's only viable when every side demilitarize, the unfortunate thing is that the world doesn't follow your fantasy. You demilitarize Asia and North Korea shall invade South Korea within a month.
So get back to reality, your "ideas" sounds good in your head, those are not viable options in reality.
1
-
1
-
@lolo_o4309 People don't want to be poor as well, but they can't work or have the willpower to not be poor. Sad life. Why don't you care about the victims instead of the criminals?
Have some sense of moral values.
Addicts before you can help them, they have already harmed dozens of people, care for them, care for the victims, pal. That's a conclusion that you've been avoided.
Career criminal is drug addict who went into prison 5 different times, pulled a gun on a pregnant woman, threatened to kill her and rob her house.
Mr George Floyd, honorable criminal.
That is career criminal.
They have all kind of support and employment for poor people, too much of those support, you're just pathetic.
If he wants to work, get a job, Amazon is hiring, local restaurants, they pay little but that's what you get for having no skill whatsoever, use your free time to gain more skill.
Look pal, society doesn't have the responsibility to take care for you. Ask the real poor people who got out of it.
It's due to you, pal.
Not the system, not the white man, it's you.
Americans are the most privileged morons in the world, and you whine about how the system is against you, no, dummy. You are against you. Your educational system is a joke, I don't understand how it's possible not to be a straight A students in your schools. And because being a straight A is that easy, your college education is as easy as it can get, just don't major in gender study. Compare it to the Koreans, Vietnamese, Chinese.
Wake up.
Unless you're way too lazy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rbc812 No, buddy, you have basic misunderstanding of what Lee Kuan Yew meant. Lee might have hated Communism but he is deeply respectful the Chinese culture, which has existed thousands of years before communism, and it is the root of Lee Kuan Yew and his family culture as well. Today, Singaporeans are much less educated than before, don't sweat it, buddy, this is a common symptomps when you're born into luxury and no suffering. But even going downhill as they are, they know very well that Taiwan belongs to China. Whether China is ruled by this government or another government, that territory belongs the bigger umbrella of Chinese civilization.
You know, the longest running civilization on the surface of the planet? Show some respect, buddy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rbc812 Buddy, you need stop to making things up. First off, Lee Kuan Yew might have advocated for Singaporean unique cultural identity, but it's very clear how the Chinese origin community owns the overwhelming majority of the wealth. They speak Chinese and they celebrate Chinese holidays, so call it what you want but you cannot hide the truth. Those are still Chinese cultures, not Singaporeans. Singapore might be the name of the land but the culture existed way before that.
And yes, the civilization does translate to ownership of territory, that's the entire point. Self determination doesn't apply to rebellious people, like I said, that island has belonged to China long before any of these "invaders" set foot on it. Exactly how do you think this ownership issues work? You go plant a flag and if you stay for 10-20 years, it automatically becomes your land? No.
The land belongs to the entity which rightfully inhibits the land for an extended amount of time, at least 200 years and above. That's the norm. And with that norm, Taiwan belongs to China, as recognized by 192 countries on Earth. The people that has been inhabiting that island have always been "Chinese", now their governmental system might have changed since the 50s, but they are literally from the same culture, same civilization and they're subjugated to the decision of the mass, because the only reason they can live there in the first place is because they have been part of China the country before communism or capitalism government.
Show some respect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rbc812 For the Singaporean issue, homie, stuffing the calendar with holidays do not change the math and physics of that island. The overwhelming majority of the people are of Chinese origin, speak Mandarin, celebrate Chinese rooted holidays and they hold all the wealth. So why don't you deal with that reality?
And no, China claim to Taiwan is not just historical claim, it's the most notable recent historical claim, that distinguishes it, because otherwise no country can ever have a claim over anything, because the territory can just be invaded and then new people can be put in and according to your logic, the invaders can now claim self determination on land that they steal. That's not how it works.
The historical claim is crucial, especially to significant continuous claims. Taiwan was under Japan rule for less than 60 years, under ROC rule for less than 20 years, it belongs to the Qing Dynasty for 250 years. And after 1945, you can no longer claim new territory, therefore the most significant owners of Taiwan is the Qing Dynasty, aka China. Furthermore, the only reason ROC can claim Taiwan is because the Japanese were returning it to China the country, which back then was represented by the ROC. Government can change, but that country remains, therefore, you literally admitted that Taiwan belongs to China the country, whether it's ruled by this party or another party.
Do you see the difference in numbers? If you don't know much about mathematics, it's best to stay quiet, homie.
1
-
1
-
@rbc812 For the Singaporean issue, stuffing the calendar with holidays do not change the math and physics of that island. The overwhelming majority of the people are of Chinese origin, speak Mandarin, celebrate Chinese rooted holidays and they hold all the wealth. So why don't you deal with that reality?
And no, China claim to Taiwan is not just historical claim, it's the most notable recent historical claim, that distinguishes it, because otherwise no country can ever have a claim over anything, because the territory can just be invaded and then new people can be put in and according to your logic, the invaders can now claim self determination on land that they steal. That's not how it works.
Do you see the difference in numbers? If you don't know much about mathematics, it's best to stay quiet, homie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rbc812 China claim to Taiwan is not counted from today going backward, buddy, it is counted backward since the ongoing of the dispute. Which is in the 1960s, so no, Taiwan has not been a distinct political entity for over 7 decades. It has been a disputed area for over 7 decades, the Chinese didn't just claim it now, it was stolen territories 7 decades ago, they claim it then and it is stolen territories now. You see, we now live in a modern age where you can't just invade people without cause and then claim self determination as the invaders. All claims are judged via their legitimacy counting from around 1945. And like always, Taiwan the island is territory of the people of China, whether they're ruled by this government or another government. Again, you need to study up
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeffreyhagelin6047 No, pal, the previous administration inherited recession and then they double our national debt for not that much growth at all. Can you tell me which good part of the economy did Donald Trump inherit? He repealed the previous Economy Policies, give tax cut, remove the Paris thing, apply pressure to China, all new things that directly resulted in better results, Obama got back to the original spot before recession and then achieved nothing since then. Don't mistaken between somebody gain result after something and somebody gains result due to something. They're totally different.
The farmers lost the Chinese, well, the Chinese steel, plastic, manufacturing lost the U.S, unless you don't know math, greater loss for the opposition is a win for us. Pal, just because nothing was happening before Trump doesn't mean that everything was fine, we were being cheated, being dominated in the market. You can not cooperate if one side doesn't play fair, it's the thing that you and Obama, both lack understanding of, it's called economic. Clear?
The difference between changing the right way and changing your way is what your way doesn't provide any reason, any plan, any logic for the change.
1
-
@jeffreyhagelin6047 Pal, and you are ignoring facts just to type whatever kind of things you want, which is ridiculous. The President is undergoing several investigation, which didn't give out any proof, anything, at all, so it's called clear of charge. Learn some actual law.
And the electoral collage system isn't outdated, it's aheads of it's time, it's how California can not dictate the entire country. America is too vast, and too complex, don't compare us to France, we're not France.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cellphone7223 I don't think you understand how economic works, what regulation means and what market demand is. You're like a cow regurgitating what's been fed down it's throat. Friedman would have been ashamed of you.
No economy exists without regulation, that's a fact, regulation of the government is absolutely crucial in ensuring the viability of an "economy", because economy ties directly to human wellbeing, and when human wellbeing is not ensured, they revolt.
Friedman argument of less government intervention applies to very specific types of intervention in the American economy. And even his policies include countless "regulations", for example regulations that you're not allowed to commit financial fraud, business fraud, securities fraud, that food providers must meet basic eatable and drinkable conditions.
All of those regulations are to ensured that once the free market goes into operation, it doesn't lead to social unrest by causing harm.
That's in the US, where there's a minimum living condition embedded within the structure of the country.
Argentina is not the US, it's scenario is different, the policies are different, their corporation structure is different, their population is different. For example, if a gigantic, significant number of people is living in poverty, far more than the US in the 1980s when Friedman is alive. Suddenly taking away intervention policies directly affect their wellbeing, while the intervention of the "free market" takes far longer than the time those people have on hand.
So if the free market takes 5-7 years to adjust and get the economy back on track. Are you going to let the significant pool of the population starve to death due to rising prices?
You're trying to solve an infinitely complex problems with multiple moving parts based on a rudimentary answer Friedman give to a kid in 2 minute Q&A clip.
Wake up. This is way over your head, pal, so stop regurgitating stuff you don't understand one bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@antarchy1 Actually he can. Once you study the higher ups aspect of economics, you realize that the potential to create wealth is the most heavily wanted aspect of wealth. Because it comes with much more perks than normal cash. The guy who wins the powerball has a lot more cash than Elon Musk. But what Elon has, cash can't buy.
And yes, his followers are willing to buy his stuff. They're going to buy more. I don't know how you white oppressor thinks but mistaken that criminal Floyd guy for the black hero is insane. Robbing a house, threatening a pregnant woman, using counterfeit money, doing drugs. That's the role model black parents want their children not to follow.
Black people support Kanye greatly, pal. How do you know, you're not even black.
Let me give you a clue how the world works, you do not represent the adult population in America.
In case you hadn't noticed, you lunatics are the overwhelming minority. The riots that happened in the name of criminal Floyd is liked by nobody except insane people like you. Real people has their family to worry about. No privilege time to go rob a convenient store in the name of justice.
Keep it real, homie.
You sad people said the same thing when he endorsed Trump, when he try to run for President, and his values has gone no where but up.
How many times can you deny reality, pal? His assets are not speculative, they're very much real, his connection to the black community is much real than what Jay-Z, Meek Mill, other rich black guy has, and that is way more powerful than credits. Michael Bloomberg spent half a billion dollars cash and people still hate his guts.
Go study real economics pal, go meet real people, not the ones inside your bubble. You claim he is crazy, he views you as an ignorant oppressor, the difference is that his community agrees with him and not you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@olorin3815 Buddy, those dynasties always recognize themselves as continuation of each other, do you get that?
There has always been one China, ever since the Qin dynasty, different names of Dynasties, same country, same culture, same economics, same language. The wars they have between themselves is to unify the country back to one, buddy, you need a better education in history, buddy. Those wars are between different warlords governing districts within China to see who rules over China, there was never a time where they consider themselves separate countries conquering other places. There is one people, one country. Unlike the "Romans".
All big empires have some sort of infighting, peak for peak, there's no discussion, the Chinese Empire stood on top of human civilization for about 30% of recorded human history.
1
-
1
-
@iamyoda66 Buddy, you might live under that delusions, but that's not the truth. There's no Western system in China or India, here's a clue for a simpleton like you, just because they name it one way doesn't mean it's like that.
You have to learn to be a bit more sophisticated.
Technology is not exclusively Western, buddy, technology and knowledge belongs to mankind, and it was contributed equally by multiple countries throughout history, for example, you are using the Arabic numeral system, among which there's a zero first contributed by the Indian, and then the trigonometry identities also contributed by the Indian, and the knowledge was replicated and transported throughout the world by sea faring, which is only possible via compass invented in China.
Keep your head down, sad lay person.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mr.007BD There's nothing innovative about Elon Musk, Gates or Larry Page anymore, if you think Russia can't copy their work in an instant if needs be, you're delusional.
The value of companies like Tesla or Google, or Facebook are fictional value, they can disappear easily. While Gazprom value is completely solid, because oil and gas is a necessity to people's live while if Google crashes, we still have Bing and countless other search engine and email system.
USA can not develop better weapons, I don't think you understand what is "modern integrated technology", weaponry technology must push the boundaries of physical limitation, which has nothing to do with informatic technologies, you can take the entire US top 50 companies and ask them to develop ballistic missiles, they would fail because that's a very different field that they don't have any expertise in.
Every country on Earth who don't want to be enslaved by the American thugs buy Russia weapons, most notably India and China.
US have been living in a bubble, kid. Your "bubble" will pop once it's war time. US wealth are fictional wealth, they're not real.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@careneh33 And that's exactly why you're a fraud. You justify your science not by your methodology, not by the validity of it, not by the result it got, but because you got them in publications.
If your journal is open access, they're probably not that high of a quality. There are very few high quality open access journal. Quality over quantitiy.
Overwhelming majority of high impact factor journals are not open access. So I guess that you published in mostly non prestigious journals, which defeats the entire purpose of publishing it in a journal at all. Why would you submit it to a journal if the journal is not high quality?
You must be a rookie or you have bad scientific training, not all journals are the same, not all scientific venues are the same, not even all scientific field are the same. Some are incredibly more prestigious than another and I'm speaking from actual experience that even the most prestigious of them all are filled with inner circle influence. If you're not aware of this fact, maybe there's an even bigger problem, that your field is not really scientific field, not a natural science field. But your field is something of a make belief field, like psychology, or tourism, or economy. Social sciences or make belief sciences, poor discipline.
Which are fine, but unfortunately when I say not all science are the same, I specifically means that kind of science. The fraudulent science.
So exactly what kind of scientific field are you in that you think that there are no fraud? Which is nearly impossible because people who submitted to prestigious journals are either editors themselves, had their contacts or mentors as editors on those journals. In my field, mechanics and electronics, that's inevitable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@careneh33 No, an okay journal is not an okay choice.
Don't know where you get such line of thoughts but there's no such thing as striving for okay in the academic world.
Have some standards, will ya?
Look, of you're living in some kind of fantasy where you think more articles in mediocre journals gives you more experience than someone who only publish in prestigious journals, you're delusional.
Keep it real, homie. You don't need affiliation of any kind to understand the arguments behind an article, but an affiliation can easily lowers the standards of judgement and makes the approval process more prone to mistakes.
Show some respect, darling.
You don't publish in the most prestigious journals, you don't dare to name your scientific field. For you to stand out and vouch for the credibility of scientific publication is quite sad.
Whatever peer-reviewed process you're talking about in your field, you're just a chump, try to get to the big boys league, will you? I might have published less articles than you, but I can most likely guarantee that all of them have higher quality than yours, more rigorous methodology in a tougher field.
Quality over quantity. Keep up with the time.
Exactly what is your scientific field? Gender studies?
1
-
@careneh33 But again, goes back to the original Fridman comment.
Code is code, data is data, articles being published in prestigious journals or not do not change their scientific nature. Code is code, data is data. The more transparency there is in those things, the better.
However, if you're going the route of scientific journals that are good and non peer reviewed is bad, then you need to realize how much corruption there are within even the most prestigious journals out there. So your argument makes no sense no matter what.
Within all the top journals, there are inner circle influences, a guy almost fake his way to a Nobel Prize called Jan Schon, he can only do this because of the lowering standard process that happens then and till this day.
So I don't know where this delusion of yours come from to say that you are good and pure with high standards despite reality says otherwise.
Keep it real, homie.
1
-
@careneh33 No, this isn't straw manning, darling. This is real life experiences that you know nothing about.
Most scientists are frauds. If you really understand the nature of these things, you'll be shocked to realize how many of these articles are just articles for articles sake. To pump up the numbers of publications and fill their quotas.
By default, if over 50% of anything is something, you can categorize them, I'm fairly certain, very certain that more than 50% of scientists are frauds, number one is that there are way too many fraudulent field of studies that follow little rigorous discipline. Most notably can be your field of studies. And the next thing is the distribution of excellent individuals.
A guy graduating last out of med school is still a doctor, not a really good one but still a doctor. The same applies with any other kind of professions.
Most teachers aren't really good teachers, and most scientists aren't really good scientists. Incompetence is just unintentional fraud
So go learn some math and have some class.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@caspernetherlands698 Again, that's not how it works, you need to calculate the continuous occupation of the people since 1945 counting backwards. Exactly when did the Brits give it away, and what was the population percentage at the time were like, and then you have to count backward since that date to see how long it has been like that.
But anyway, doesn't matter what it was, the US intervention is clearly illegitimate. Even if that place doesn't rightfully belong to Serbia, Serbia has a claim to certain amount of interests that are up for negotiation on how the road map to independence for that place would be.
People are unhappy all the time, and every ethnic minority wants independence, the key is to find a negotiated solution between involved parties, that process was hijacked by the US.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Either way, he should be responsible?" Clear hypocrite right there, puritans in public, perverts in private. They don't even look at facts.
-Prostitution contribute 1% to Korea GDP every year, maybe one of those dudes in the video committed it yet still faking their ass off.
- A club is no where near a paradise of civilize action, they know what they're going in to, voluntarily giving up the right to decency, they check your ID at the gate, fully responsible inside. Most of those "girls" probably do slight drugs and get themselves wasted to the point unable to walk and then get "abused"? What do you think's gonna happen? Go to a slumdog and see whether you get mugged.
- So Seungri is in a group-chat , big deal? It's filming without consent, not drugged, not rape, not even serious felony.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mentally_neglectful What you're talking about make no sense, dummy.
Define what is good writing? The story is not about them, they're the side character, the story revolves around the protagonist.
Every story has a protagonist, and the only reason a story is worth while is because everything happens to serve a purpose for the protagonist.
Everyone is a hero in their own story.
The movie focuses on the view of one person, just like how in your life, you only focus on your view. And what's wrong with that?
Get down from your highhorse of hypocrisy, pal. You're just looking for reasons to hate everything, even if those reasons don't make sense at all.
The point of the movies are to tell a story about the guy, not the girl, and there's nothing wrong with that. Somebody paint their car blue but you liking the color red is not a basis to criticize their color choice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@suprotyv7534
Now you need to take back Crimea with force to show that your belief is correct kid, apparently no Crimean follows you.
It's not a belief, it's a fact that the people in Crimea came heavily from Russia, ask them, kid. Your justification of Israel creating their own territory comes from the same philosophy.
And even more, what Hitler did with the Germans in Sudetes are not bad, it's him killing all those people afterwards are bad.
You're mistaken between full Nazism evil, and a good action committed by Nazism authority.
That's not how argument works, kid.
The same logic applies with Cuba, Venezuela, any country with a coup, the people stood up, it's their rights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@josephhoward4697 It's usually difficult to call top or bottom but not in this case, pal.
Inflation is there, it's not going to stop just by one interest rate hike, so by default, it will continue to rise and the fed will continue raise interest rates.
You can't time top or bottom in a normal decline, but you can very much time top or bottom in a massive crash. Especially a "stagflation" period, if the economy can't go up anymore, it has to go down, and if there's no logical sign of it bouncing back up, the crash hasn't reach the bottom yet. The stock market is propped up on free money, how long can that last? Market will crash sooner or later then it will recover. So thinking that it will never crash is stupid.
If by your argument of the long run, then it doesn't matter if you buy the dip or not, you can even buy it at the top and hold because in the long run, 30, 40 years, good companies will outperform whatever price that is.
But that's not what ordinary people wants to do. Sure, we'll hold some of the stocks for 30, 40 years, but not all of them, people need cash to live, and time it correctly is key to maximize your profit in 4-5 years.
1
-
1
-
No, that's ridiculous, pal. Nobody saw this coming. Because they hide it from the world.
What SBF did is not a ponzi scheme, it's just theft, customers put in cash, he used those cash not for reserves, but to invest and buy cryptos, people want withdrawals, they don't have enough cash, people start to sell cryptos, the cryptos they hold fall in prices.
It's not fraud, it's theft, 2 different things.
Now the nonsensical valuation of crypto can be true, but that's not what happened here, there was no "bubble", this is just theft.
1
-
When you try it, you would know. Simply put, putting that really cool VR is a lot more interesting than looking at your phone.
VR gaming hasn't existed yet, because it lacks the technology to do so. Compare the earliest model of smartphones to now. The volume of content hasn't exploded at that time because the processing power of such earlier phones are too weak.
VR content creator depends on the level of VR goggles. And because very few people can now own a high quality one, they hasn't made it yet. Like the development of high end gaming, to get one, you need high end PC, only when the PC are powerful enough does the gaming market booms. When the goggles are powerful enough, which some already are, they just need to make them cheaper, once those goggles are cheaper, content creator will start going in.
VR gaming holds more potential than just normal 2d screen gaming, but all the cash poured into game development are in traditional 2d gaming, onto PC and consoles game. Once those money start pouring into VR gaming, everybody will want to play those games.
Metaverse is just a part of the the virtual reality experience, but if Meta owns the technology to develop the cheapest yet also the best VR goggles, they'll also profit big time from the VR gaming industry. With cloud computing gaming, maybe eventually you don't even have to own a high end PC for the high end goggles, so the only thing you need is the hardware, which is the VR goggles.
And to your question of why don't people meet up with their friends, this is easily explained if you have Facebook consumer data. The amount of time people spent chatting on their Messenger and Whatsapp far exceed the amount of time they spend meeting in real life by a landslide, this is easily observable, people are getting more and more detached from the real life. It's not a good thing but it's happening, Meta just want to cash in on it. Right now you can only video call each other, what happens if you can play of round of virtual golf together in the metaverse, something pretty difficult to do in real life because most people aren't rich enough to play golf.
The quality of the experience will depends on the quality of the goggles, and the quality of the goggles are going up. And the reason why don't meet up in the real world is because the real world is limited, instead of meeting up with each other that takes 3 to 5 hours, people would just rather chat over Messenger immediately without having to make plans. It's easier to connect in the virtual world.
It's not a good thing but it's happening, even if you're against it, countless idiots are still doing it. Frankly, posting your social life on to Instagram or Facebook is just ridiculous, it's like passive bragging where you post stuff intentionally for other people to see, it's quite shameless and quite dangerous if the wrong people are targeting you, but people aren't built to be logical, they do a lot of dumb stuff. For example now instead of having a profile page, in the Metaverse you can get a profile room where you create a room of virtual experiences to express yourself.
The application is endless, because it brings back new experience, and people always fall for that. Twitter is Facebook but a lot shorter, as if posting shorter messages means you'll get more meaningful messages. Tiktok is YouTube, but also shorter, same argument. People are lazy and they behave in illogical ways, Meta just want to cash in. Indulging somebody stupidity is in a way, serving your customer. Can't blame them for that.
If a company should only exist if it helps society, then Apple for sure should not exist, they sell average products for sky high prices, bad consumerism. Amazon shouldn't exist, they treat their workforce quite inhumanely compared to other type of online shopping applications even in Asia. But hey, they turn a profit, people are not that smart, they do stuff that are dumb, and these companies took advantage of those things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AR-ym4zh So you failed to give any study at all, let me explain why is that. it isn't real, kid. Anything relating to disaster created by climate change is rising sea level, and it will rise about 40 centimeters for the next 200 years. That saying if we keep things like this, fortunately, we're not, unlike you idiots keep screaming nonsense, we're actually doing something, just today, 170 countries signed to cut single plastic use, that is actual progress. Energy sources are being researched, solar was scientifically proved not being adequate. Nuclear is a clean energy, no emission at all, why don't you learn actual science, get actual scientific source, and stop listening to nonsensical propaganda?
There, I just educated you, you're welcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jebjohnson5573 Not 200, kid, every year, about 60 launch happens ever since 1990.
So yeah, not 200, way to fake the math.
Your logic is wrong, it's not statistics, here, your assumption of because a small number of accidents in a large scale means it safe, that purely nonsense.
Oil cracking has been happening for 50 years, and accidents have happened, but compared to what they've done continuously every day, every hour, every process for the last 50 years, the chance of accidents are even smaller, but doesn't mean it's not dangerous, you troll.
So is police, they die much less, doesn't mean it's not a dangerous jobs.
You're lying about what the statistic means.
That auto pilot program, capable of crashing in open view, which is out of the hands of the driver.
Moron, if the car malfunction in autopilot and cause a crash, kill somebody, who would take responsibility? A computer.
You never explicitly say the the car is safe, you assumed that by quoting a statistics, which you have no idea what it means, to counter the argument that "because it's not 100% safe, you can not rely on that technology for your safety on the road".
Don't be a troll, kid, you've been destroyed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@_B.C_ Zimmerman didn't get libeled against.
Well, the sleeping disorder seemed pretty worn off now. The kid seemed pretty happy owning the libs. Unlike Zimmerman, Kyle is actually a hero. Because the people he shot is actually criminal and he was mistreated by the media.
He has enough time to figure out a better dream, especially with the money MSNBC and CNN has to pay him. Unlike Zimmerman. The media mishandled this case big time. Just like with Nicholas Sandmann.
Chances of suicide increasing for killing a criminal who's about to kill you. Well, there's help for that, which he can easily paid for by the money CNN will soon pay him.
As long as you insane people run the country, promoting crime and lawlessness, Kyle will always be a symbol, so he'll be fine for the next 4 ears, possibly the next 10 years because you insane bunch die out slowly.
He'll be fine, PTSD and sleeping disorder is nothing we can't handle. Criminals who attacked him suffered from a much worse condition than that.
1
-
@_B.C_ Of course he's going to be able to earn it again on his own merit.
Unlike you dummies, he's not a beggar living off government program.
Finding new job is not that hard in this country, pal. And he always have a job as a speaker for the NRA.
Heroes who shot criminals are always needed. The opportunity is endless, and even if he feels tired of the public life.
Nobody forgot about Nicholas Sandmann even though it has been 2 years, NBC just laid him more money. And nice try. If you can mess Trump up with lawsuits, you would have done it. Those lawsuits are like a desperate boxer throwing a random punches. None is going to land, pal. Nobody's afraid of that, it's just sad to see how desperate you are. Bring it on.
Most of the college peers are idiots, protesting self defense? If those dummies are in your college, that's probably a horrible college.
He's not feared in Florida, Texas, any state where the sane people holds the majority.
So again, false argument. It's not vigilante fantasy, kid. It's real human right to self defense. You want to test whether those are real or not?
Try attacking somebody via a riot, you will not be missed.
Perfect legal shot, innocent citizen, about half of the country supporting him. What do you have? Sad sjws holding a sign protesting him?
Bring it on. When he move to Texas or Florida with the money CNN and MSNBC have to pay him. It would be amusing seeing you idiots following to protest. There will be some other thing waiting for you there by the way.
1
-
@_B.C_ Oh, you're still living in that delusion.
His face is definitely not feared in Texas or Florida, those 2 states alone are enough.
You keep denying reality, it's not going to work out well for you.
And Trump legal problems? Bring it on, pal. Watching too much mainstream media deludes you from the truth. There's nothing there, nothing concrete.
Sandmann is a big name not to you losers, but to CNN and MSNBC, why? They paid him big money, he'll survive. The things Rittenhouse and Sandmann are "scrapping off" on media lawsuits probably is more than Don Lemon salary, and that's saying something.
Keep denying reality, little kid. It's not going to work.
You attack another person for no reason, they will shoot you dead without losing any sleep.
You're welcomed to test that theory yourself.
Go troll elsewhere, little kid. This is just sad.
1
-
@_B.C_ Oh, you actually think blue is taking over the city in Texas. Nice try, you can't even hold Virginia.
Any colleges that are full of "blues" is probably a quite an incompetent college.
The result of Harvard, MIT, or Stanford are not produced by their students, but are produced by their faculty members., which sometimes are blue, but definitely not stupid enough to lower themselves to the likes of you.
So if he goes to a "college" where people are dumb enough to loathe him, it will be way better to leave that incompetent college. Funny thing about colleges, unlike your fake theories of red states being taken over. Colleges are actually being taken over by conservative students, why? Because the liberals are too dumb to remain there, something about sky high debt scaring incompetent people studying gender studies.
Owning AR does prevent dummies like you from attacking those people in the front. And if you want to take your chances that they can't just turn around and defend themselves, go ahead.
How many people did you attack and got away with it? Probably zero, if it's not zero then you're just a criminal.
Scumbag either way, pal.
Kyle run away, that's a sensible thing to do, if anybody had shot him in the back while he's running away, they would've been convicted for murder, study real law, kid, that's what happens.
But when those aggressors rushed Kyle and attacked him, well, Kyle didn't need an eye behind his back to defend himself and those "attackers" are now dead.
You try attacking people, you will be too. At least in sane states.
If you got away with attacking people, you're a criminal, nothing to brag about, kid. We will come for you eventually.
1
-
@_B.C_ You're living in a fantasy, kid. You see that crowd there?
That's biggest nationwide student politics organization. Where's your counter Democrats organization? Antifa?
In the insane states of California, that's probably where you live. Colleges are full of blues, of course that state is full of insane people. We're talking about sane states here, where you can't touch us and if you do, we'll knock you right back down.
Bring it on, chump? Just like Biden hilarious warning to Republicans in 2022, only been one year and his ass has already been thrown out by his own party. Just like his laughable warning, your joke of a warning doesn't bother us at all.
Bring it, chump, we'd like to see you try.
Otherwise the only thing you can do is wail in despair on the internet.
At least what I'm talking on the Internet is true. How's Virginia? Those colleges full of blues can't retain their states? That's just sad.
1
-
@_B.C_ Nobody cares for Virginia?
How can you expect to win massive Republican states when you can't even hold one to middle size Democrats states?
Fairy dust?
Biden is my President, and because he's my President, he's also my servant, servant to the people, you see?
And Biden will be voted out by the people. Wail in despair, little kid. You can have the office for 4 little years, you'll damage it so much that the you'll be giving it right back.
What charges are you going to charge Trump? Hurting your feelings?
That's not a real crime, kid.
You got the concept of self defense wrong, kid.
You do that, you shot somebody just because they're holding a weapon legally. You'll be charged with murder.
Study real law, little kid.
Kyle was defending himself, what you're describing is just murder.
Those aggressors was attacking Kyle, in your example, you are attacking other people.
See the difference?
Kyle case was ruled at self defense, the action you're describing is murder.
You go try and do that, hope you like prison food.
Not the same thing, even though how you dummies want them to be.
1
-
@_B.C_ Only when that somebody is pointing the gun at you for no reason, pal. And only when there's credible reason of premeditated conflict.
If you go up to a stranger holding a weapon and then spook him and then claim self defense. Not going to happen, that's murder.
Like I said, study real law, kid.
You put somebody in prison for assaulting you, that's good for you.
Your try doing that again with the example you gave me and you'll be the one who is in prison. Prison food gone downhill since Reagan so I don't recommend that.
You fired Trump for now, congratulations. For now, because only a blind person can deny that you replaced him with an even sadder clown.
Brandon is about to have his second once in a lifetime military failure under 2 years.
Enjoy the moment, kid, because we all know it's not going to last. Trump had put in place changes that you can never hope to win back.
Just right now, the clown you elected got his agenda shut down by one of those changes.
Go back to insane land of California, pal, getting your ass kicked everywhere else must hurt.
1
-
@_B.C_ Actually, there is. If you are the aggressor, for example yelling, throwing things at other, if you initiate the conflict.
Your right to self defense is nulled.
For example, had Joseph Rosenbaum shot Kyle, he would be charged with murder, because he initiated the conflict when he seemed out Kyle and tried to attack him.
See the difference, study real law.
If you see Kyle shooting at people, you are entitled to self defense. But if Kyle was defending himself and then you mistaken him for an active shooter, it's still manslaughter.
Because you have mistakenly identifying the action.
"Spook" here means an action directly aimed at doing something at a person.
Like I said, you need to study real law, kid.
It's your argument that won't hold up in court.
Owning a gun, carrying it in public is legal. It is not legal for you to use that gun to kill somebody whom you initiated the conflict with or if that person is not an active shooter or such. Mistakenly identifying someone as an active shooter is your fault and you will be charged with manslaughter. Only when that person directly point the gun at you, whom you did not initiated the conflict with, then can you shoot that person.
Had Kyle shot Gaige Grosskreutz from afar, that would have also been murder. But no, Grosskreutz approached Kyle, pointing a gun at him. That's what makes it self defense. See the difference, little dummy?
This is a free advice, you keep that blind belief not attached to reality and you'll end up in jail. Not that it would sadden me one bit.
You have no idea of stand your ground law is. Your bad interpretation of it is why it's so terrifying to have you dummies in charge. No basic understanding of the law.
1
-
@_B.C_ You have that right only when you're not the aggressor.
If that person randomly point the gun at you, they're a criminal and you're entitled to that right.
And no sane Republicans are criminals. So the only people you can shoot is Antifa attackers. Thank you for proving my point.
A concerned bystander is not entitled to kill people whom he "think" that is an active shooter.
You must correctly identify an active or shooter or your action is considered manslaughter, pal.
An armed men shooting an active shooter, that's self defense.
An armed men shoot a person he mistakenly identify as an active shooter, that's manslaughter.
Unlike you dummies, members of the NRA distinguish that quite easily.
Like I said, study real law, kid.
No, standing your ground is a right entitled to all citizens. You lunatics just failed to comprehend what it means.
So you dummies will probably end up in jail while people like Rittenhouse will always goes free.
Whine about it, little kid. The law doesn't work based on your feelings.
You do what you want, you'll be in jail for doing so. It wouldn't sadden me at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@_B.C_ My degree is framed at my house, like I said, can't disclose it, especially to you terrorists.
And again, you need to study real law, kid. Pointing a gun at someone unprovoked, that is brandishing.
In your example, you intentionally provoke an interaction by attacking the person beforehand, that's when your right to self defense is stripped away.
And Kyle was swinging his gun around with the reasonable range of allowance.
For example, if you strap on a gun, the barrel follows the laws of physics to spin around it's axis, at a very tiny window of time, the barrel could be pointing at somebody right before it immediately follow the trajectory of the rotation to not be pointing at somebody anymore.
You can't kill somebody just for that. You need to have reasonable doubt that he or she is actually wanting to hurt you. And those doubt must be verified.
You see Kyle spinning around right after shooting Rosenbaum in self defense and then you shot Kyle from afar just because it "ended up" pointing at you for less than a second, without Kyle showing any hostility towards you? That's still manslaughter, little kid.
Like I said, study real law, little kid.
He can't be tried for criminal assault, here's why. The dummy prosecutors of that states, as incompetent as they are did study real law, therefore they know that there's no basis for such ridiculous charge. Pointing guns or brandishing requires the proof of "intent" to harm, accidental alignment based on physical rotation doesn't cut it.
Like I said, real law. Not fantasies inside your head, but real law.
If you don't study that, you'll end up in jail.
1
-
@_B.C_ Sorry, pal. You can't trick me into disclosing information to terrorists.
"We are coming for you eventually" is a figurative speech. You can't use out of context speech to do anything, that's another thing that had you studied law, you would've known.
If you saw somebody shooting people and swing the gun around not to aim at other people, but only because he's running away and he didn't yet lower the gun down.
You do not have the right to shoot that person. It would not be self defense, kid. It's manslaughter.
A gun being pointed at you is not enough, you need to have reasonable doubt of intent. Brandishing means pointing INTENTIONALLY.
If it's not intentional, or more narrowly speaking, directly aim towards you, if it's not direct, you have no self defense claim.
Had you been there and saw Kyle from afar, it's quite clear that he doesn't know of your presence, therefore you have no claim of intention. Manslaughter charge at least.
If a loaded gun is directly pointed at you with the intention of it aiming at you, you have the claim to self defense.
You see Kyle turning with his gun from afar and you shoot him, that's manslaughter. You have no proof of intention of harm, no self defense.
How do I put this gently, pal. A guy intentionally crash a car at you, you can shoot him. A guy driving normally from afar, which will eventually hit you if you don't move, and this far enough. You shoot him, you'll go to prison.
Like I said, real law, darling.
You don't study it then you'll go to prison. Rittenhouse is free but you won't be.
Your life is not in reasonable danger, there's the word "reasonable" there.
If you want to take a bet on whether your standard of reasonable fits with a jury. Go ahead, stupid move but one more idiot in jail won't bother me at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, it's not facts, it's hypocrisy.
If you want to work from home, fine. You can prefer it and ask for your employer to accommodate, that's a working condition like any other working condition such as medical care or wages or paid leave. But you can't just assume moral highgrounds demanding it.
You don't have any moral highground to demand that, you have the right to ask for it, and if it's refused, you have to do what you were employed to do.
The moral issue is you thinking that you're entitled to demand it, you're not entitled to a demand, you're entittled to a negotiation, and that's it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Alan Gonzalez And unfortunately, out of those 40000 people, only about 40 people died because of misfortune events , the rest, well. The bill comes due, this generation or the other. You know, in countries with single payer system, there's also another thing that they have, 1/60-1/30 of American population with a GDP of 1/18- 1/20. Are you trying to misunderstood basic math or you're just stupid. It's not that we don't want to, we can't. Name a way to pay for those thing. This is not Canada, not Sweden or Denmark. Want to know the difference, probably going back to school is the best way.
1
-
Sandro Rugama Math is your enemy or is it common sense. Medicare for all cost 3.3 trillions per year, we spent 700 billions per year for military, if we dismantle our army, it will cover for less than 1/4 of that ridiculous plan, and then the world will soon go to WW3 due to rising nuclear super power in Asia, religious war zone in the Middle East, European nations building large armies controlled by different leaders. Here's an advice, kid. Go back to school. A basic knowledge that you should have discussing "taxes". 45% of American Household pay no income taxes, it's not Mitt Romney claim, it's a real report. Go back to school, kid. Don't drop out and then pretend that you're average, it's pathetic. Also, when China or Russia is keeping the world's order, then compare military spending. We spent that much is partially due to the fact they are also spending big on military.
1
-
Sandro Rugama Do you know anything about US military spending, anything about logic. When did we last have a major military operation? 2011, let's say 2013 , and now we're removing people out of the middle east, so the "money" to spend for wars, does not exist, because unless we do participate actively in major operations, it's more of a defense line of the area than a full scale war. Stop making up the money that doesn't exist.
Learn some social study, the US do not have a large population of taxpayer to cover up, if only 53% of the people pay income taxes, as well as the fact that the current rate haves the top 1% paying 40%, taking anything for more than the the actual necessity would be plain stealing. Don't use words such as maybe to back up your total ridiculous thesis that people will happily comply to something that's impossible. I'm not arrogant, if you consider saying the truth, facts, reasoning straight to people who don't understand those things "arrogance"? Then it's mostly your low standard of living and not them.
1
-
Sandro Rugama Only morons will ignore the validity of people's point because they don't like how they were presented. Go back to school and learn how to think. What you're saying have no proof, the last time the Americans didn't intervene, North Korea was on it's way to merging South Korea as the South of Korea. So don't type nonsensical things about stuff you know nothing about. Want to know what will happen without the American Military, get a flight to Syria, and then go on foot to the deep territory of ISIS. Try to peace talking then, tell me the result then. If you don't know anything, don't type anything, because somehow in your delusional mindset, you think that a radical terrorist group will not invade the rest of the area just like what they did with other areas when the military defending the rest of the area leave, is that too confusing. Here's analogy, the fire will burn the wood when you throw the wood into the fire.
Next thing about taxes, you clearly do not know business, kid. The top 1% is paying the most of what federal programs need, heard of maths, and they do that willingly, you want higher wages, has the workload that you done increases? Has the minimal cost of living increased? Food, water, clothing, it's all getting cheaper. What the hell do you want working with "wages", it's called society, you think the top 1% is just there and never shifts, total nonsense, wealth are created and lost everyday, everytime, the guys on Wall Street working their asses off, the guys in CEOs offices working their asses off, and you just "claim" that they're stealing??? If you're incompetent, don't come whining to better people why you're a loser.
1
-
1
-
Alan Gonzalez So your basic argument that the page "seemed" bias, where's the proof for that, where's your brain by using the thesis "if I don't like something, it's false". Where do you get the report that says " a lot", or is it an assumption you made based on the name which includes the word "national". Where's the number for your "a lot" statements. Why haven't there been any article about those "a lot". NIH sends the funding to researcher, and again, where's your source of claiming that researchers get money mostly from the NIH, where's that article you made up? I have a source, you don't seem to have any.
Also, stop editing me out of context, no it's not because you think that healthcare should be a right, it's the fact that you do not support hard work, hard earn, as well as rooting for the poor and the lazy, you're asking for something that in intellectual mindset should never be a thing. We do not abandon people to die, it's legally required to any public hospitals to take care of people with fatal symptoms, if they actually go there. Unfortunately, those people who you claimed should have that "right", usually dies on the street, in the gutter, landfill, places that you don't want to go to, therefore don't play stupid fairy godmother and pretend that you care about those people.
Illegal Immigrants, they're not eligible for medicaid, first of all, because they're criminals, read the law, go to the border, if you don't ask for something and then somebody will just, force those things on you, first of all, it's Obamacare, second of all, it's partially dictatorship. You think that we need those "illegal immigrants" ? Maybe you should go there and negotiate something that actually shows benefit, because there's none. Intentionally contributing a dollar while taking out the capacity for a 100 dollars contribution means intentionally causing damage.
1
-
Mike Imp , get back to your bubble, Imp, or maybe whatever you call a home, probably an Asylum because you're totally delusional. Is math your enemy? Because your reasons clearly state that math is your enemy. We spent 700 billions dollars on a world security insured army, and even if we dismantle that army, which will lead to WW3 very, very soon, due to countless massive military development that will be required once the US army is gone. For example, no more South Korea, it will become South of Korea, and that new Korea will soon to have nuclear weapons, causing the Japanese to start developing their own nuclear weapons. Next to the middle east, no US army, radical terrorist groups will soon devour the region like they did where there're no US army in the past. And then oh, Russia and NATO countries, no white, red and blue giants, well they'll have to start to develop their own massive army like in the past right, probably bigger armies than in WW2. So you're against logic, mathematics, clearly delusional.
1
-
1
-
Sandro Rugama No, it wouldn't be raised 11%, moron, where did you get that "fake number". The report stated that it would first be doubled. Surpass your little 11%. Countries with single payer systems that do work, people pay 60% incom taxes, unfortunately those countries are small enough so that the taxes paid by the 1% could be moderate and still pay for the system. In America, it has already been 40%, the top is paying for 40% of the country only because they could, pal, don't use fake morals? Inherit taxes? That sounds logic to you, just because you probably don't have any, doesn't mean that you should demonize it. And is it okay if 45% of the country do not pay taxes and get the healthcare for "all", the service wouldn't be average and certainly common sense deemed it evil. Get a book learn some math, read the report, go back to school, kid.
1
-
Sandro Rugama It's an advice, get back to school, kid. You're ignoring the fact that even if we pay for that single payer system, there would be no chance that the quality of healthcare would stay the same, if you actually went to school, you would know how to value something whether worth it or not, simple method, total quality divided by the amount of money. And in your bubble, you would think that if we spent the same amount of money through a different channel, the quality will went up unconditionally? Even though the service will also be divided to countless others. Try to go to Canada, see whether that healthcare is fantastic or not. Go back to school and learn some math, there's no gap here if that gap means you'll pay less money for a system which dispose quality. So the quality would be lowered for people to went in with this stupid plan, and then they still have to pay for their own private service because betting your life on a service like that is the thing only people who can't work to have anything other than that would do. How much further do you want the tax to be, don't understand the figure of 40%? Make them pay??? You have no idea what politic is, do you. The last guy said that, Mitt Romney, expert businessman, he got defeated in a Presidential Election by the Kenyan, because the Kenyan related to poor people by saying that they don't have to pay. Go back to school, it's an advice.
1
-
Sandro Rugama
Oh, no, kid , I have the authority, the authority given to me by the US constitution, the freedom of speech, if you're confused. I also have the moral obligation of standing up to stupidity, in this case, and any other idiots who intoxicate the people's mind.
People do not die from preventable diseases, if you actually know something about healthcare, and not information taken delusional assumptions, you'll see that people who died from "preventable diseases", didn't die at the hospital gates, they didn't die in front of a private clinic, they died in slumdogs, the landfill, places that they chose to be, getting drunk in 9 a.m. It's legally required that any public hospital have to take in patients with critical conditions, and critical diseases, otherwise men fainting at the sidewalk would be left there. Research some actual facts, kid.
So you're assuming that all people from low income environment are, what? Destined to be poor? Ever heard of a job, the minimum wage system is built to provide people with basic needs, and those basic needs do not include health care, no those basic needs include the opportunity to actually get healthcare, advance things don't come to you. People from low income environment will not get a thing, if they spend all their money on programs that they should know not to spend in, such as cocaine, marijuana, alcohol, prostitutes. Are we clear on that? Not all people stay poor, the majority of the poor got poor, and not from being rich people, it's from being middle people and they started to be slackers. Name one person who died in the hospital due to lack of medicinal money? You know, doctors, they take a vow, to protect and save all living humans despite of all social status, I suggest you go and talk to some.
You meant to make them pay by creating jobs??? Do you know anything about the society? The people who don't pay taxes are the people who do not work, you know, old people who retired young and have no insurance. Backpackers who take joys in not working and go camping? The unemployment rate is not due to not having enough jobs, it's due to people choose not to work, and the jobs being taken by company moving plants to foreign countries, as well as illegal immigrants who came here illegally, disrupting our system. The last 2 problems are being taken care of. If you want some proof, I suggest you read new statistics. Not by listening to Ocasio Cortez, who is claiming that the recent tax cut is wasteful and only benefits the rich, even though that same tax cut is bringing back jobs, pushing the GDP growth to over 3%, which is something that Obama admitted that he's incapable of doing.
Final thing, kid. An old Chinese saying for idiots. If you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know. If it's too complicated, here's a direct translation. You don't know anything, so it's best not typing anything, because you're embarrassing yourself.
1
-
Alan Gonzalez
Some advice, kid. I suggest that you go back to school, because through your latest reply alone, I can confirm that you're even worse than what I expected. And "worse" here means that you're even more pathetic than what I previously deduced.
Military ain't cheap, especially when our country is maintaining world security through that army. And despite the fact it is expensive, it's not as stupid as Ocasio Cortez plan, which is based on lies that you have been fed, and you yourself. There's no such thing as $700 trillion dollars increased, stop making up facts just because you don't have any. The latest bill on military spending increased the military budget from 500 BILLIONS, NOT TRILLIONS to 700 BILLIONS, ALSO NOT TRILLIONS. I write important facts in all caps because I've also concluded that you have trouble reading, if you're dyslexic, say the truth and you'll be sympathized, otherwise people will despise you, kid.
So, to take a hundred steps further from you and Cortez fake plan, I'm gonna give you some math. IF WE DISMANTLE OUR ENTIRE ARMY, WHICH IS THE SAME THING AS THE THING KEEPING THE WORLD FROM WW3, WE WOULD STILL NOT BE ABLE TO PAY FOR THAT FAKE PLAN OF CORTEZ. BECAUSE OUR MILITARY COST 700 BILLIONS PER YEAR. CORTEZ PLAN COST US 3.3 TRILLIONS PER YEAR, AND OUR CURRENT SPENDING ON MEDICARE AND HEALTHCARE IS ONLY ONE TRILLION. MONEY DO NOT FALL FROM THE SKY, IT ALSO DO NOT APPEAR OUT OF FAKE CLAIMS SUCH AS "We have unlimited cheques for wars". THEY HAVEN'T BEEN IN EXISTENCE SINCE 2008.
CLEAR?
Final thing, kid. An old Chinese saying for idiots. If you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know. If it's too complicated, here's a direct translation. You don't know anything, so it's best not typing anything, because you're embarrassing yourself.
1
-
Alan Gonzalez, Still do not get the advice? The more you're desperately trying to prove that you're smart, the more pathetic you're getting. The USA is accountable for the security of nearly the entire globe, East Asia, Middle East, Europe, North America. Competitors such as China, and Russia do not protect anyone, kid. When was the last time Russia defend other nations? Was it 1991? And then when was the last time they invaded someone, was it 2014 ? Go back to school. And China never protects anything or anyone except North Korea, and they also straight out invaded the majority of the South China Sea, just because of the name doesn't mean it's theirs. Get the picture? Again,the old Chinese saying. If you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know. You don't know anything so get back to school, kid.
P/S: And if the only mistake you found in your comment is the letter "t", then my advice would even be more valuable to you, kid. Another major mistake in your comment is math. If the budget in 2017 is 500 billions, and the budget for 2018 is 700 billions, it's a 200 billions raise, NOT A 700 BILLIONS RAISE. Get that? Stop making up facts just because you don't have any.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mrscreamer379 They didn't prop up bad banks, they put in certain regulations, leave Lehman to bankruptcy, and the loans got paid back, pal.
The bail out is because without it, the entire economy will fail. Pretty sure that saving them and install regulation afterwards is better than letting modern economy collapse.
Local banks do local stuff. Those big banks manage the entire wealth of the country, if a local bank fail, there are other locals, if a major bank fail, possibly leading to a national crisis.
Appropriate regulation, that's what they did.
1
-
@AlekDern No, it doesn't.
Because what you're talking about are isolated incidents involving at best a few thousands and what Israelis are doing is a systematic oppression of nearly 2 millions.
Do you see the difference? I don't care how many Arabs are living in Israel, the clear problems are the 2 millions Palestinians that are under Israel illegal occupation that are put under Arpatheid law. Worst than any official legal documentation of law in Arab countries against Jews.
Why don't you go learn some math and see it's not even remotely 2 side.
Go learn some math, pal. You need it.
I'm not anti anything, except anti invasion, anti occupation, anti Arpatheid, if you're supporting Israel, you're literally supporting those 3 things because that's literally what they're doing, their invasion and occupation is recognized by the UN. Their apartheid policies are recognized by Amnesty International.
The issue has multiple sides, but not all of those sides are equal. It's just math.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hey, dumber than Einstein, that's you Des Oliver, Sexual Assault leaves something, yeah, first thing, it left with shame because there's only one guy and you have your hands, next thing, it left with 2 choices, a choice to exercise your living rights and sue the guy immediately, the second choice is to give up the rights and shut the fuck up, Those "accusers" missed chose already, there's no redo in life, they're being pathetic crying over something they did to themselves, besides, there's no proof, so they have a 50% chance of lying and add to those 50% are tons of questions about why waited so long ??? Those "accusers" mostly are failures, unemployed, useless scumbag, types like that, so don't act all high and noble, it's pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrLogicAndReason Not again with the fake math, everytime these bot supporters type a debunked nonsense all over and over, it really is despicable.
Learn some math, kid, where are you going to get the money for that Freedom Dividend? It's not a tax cut, you're not decreasing tax that are there, you're giving money away, 10% VAT shall pay for 12000 per adult, 200 millions adults, 2.5 trillions total cost, so we spent 25 trillions dollars on expenditures, not including mortgage? Even though GDP is only 19 trillions?
Are you stupid?
You don't know math, pal, you copy and past from people who also don't know math, go back to school, study.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There's a finesse in the game of Federer and Djokovic that Nadal just doesn't have.
If you have to compare the three, Federer and Djokovic is actually quite alike, very calm, cool as ice. While Nadal is a raging volcano.
Call it personal opinions but people have always preferred the cool aspect of tennis more, gentlemen sport and all.
That doesn't mean Nadal is worse. No, the raging volcano may win more. It's just that the aesthetic of it isn't as great.
This is reflected in the "endorsement deal" that people give Federer, Nadal is right behind, and people really don't like Djokovic for some reason.
Winning is not really the measure of a tennis player, because it's very incompatible if you factor in countless differences in era and coaching, surfaces, suitable opponents, even the preferred hand of an opponents can be a crucial factors.
It's just the visual appeal that's distinctive. One or two more grand slam doesn't really make that much a difference. Playing style, footages is what should be looked at.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
1
-
Mission Failed Here we go again, a big example of failing mindset developing here. This is an advice, you're pathetic. What again is wrong with my points again? None of you were able to point them out, and there this idiot who thinks that pretending to quit because I was "mean" on him will save his face, we guess what? It does not. An old Chinese saying for you kid, if you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know, you don't know anything, so put down your phone, go back to school, kid, because dropping out and then pretend that you're knowledgeable by confusing between "debating format" and real debating, like I said, pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@samuelweir5985 No, like I said, there were civilians casualties.
And yeah, probably there were torture as well, but there's no point torturing civilians, it's a waste of time. The people who were tortured aren't civilians. If they did engaged in combat activities, they're enemy combatants.
Another thing learnt from the US office of legal counsel.
But like I said, your claim of Russian objective to kill civilians is stupid.
Those 500 people were civilians casualties, not intentional, just casualties.
Ever wonder what the civilians casualties in the Iraq war is?
It's nearly a million people, by the way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sofiamolinaro6555 Again, that doesn't make any sense, pal. Humans are pack creatures, we depend on each other, nobody can live a totally isolated life as much nobody can live a totally dependent life.
Keep it real, homie. Finding your own happiness by yourself is actually the equivalent of filling your lives up with superficial things.
Human emotions always depend on incoming variables of life, of people around you. A person living in total isolation can never find "happiness". This has been tested quite extensively with astronauts in space isolation. Show some respect.
Go learn some math, pal, you'll see it's quite meaningless what you're saying. You may think you're finding happiness by yourself but you're absolutely not. Your happiness, if it exists at all, is the contribution of countless factors, that you might not know how lucky you are to have them.
Keep it real, homie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's because they don't boycott things for fictional events, buddy.
The most obvious truth is that all of these claims of genocide are absolutely, unequivocally false.
You can go there, the Uyghurs live normal lives, they have their mosques, their cuisine, it's an autonomous region. If you don't break the laws, which are the same everywhere in China, they don't get arrested.
Their birth rate is far higher than the national average of Han Chinese.
So again, go study real math, buddy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think you know anything about History, buddy. Go study history, Taiwan is a part of China, the people on there are immigrants from China mainland, speak the same language, write the same way, share the same culture, history, celebrate the same festivals, they even consider the same person, Sun Yat Sen as national hero.
Hawaii is historically not belong to the United States, so is California. But Taiwan has been officially a part of China twice as long as the entire existence of the United States. And unofficially even far longer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thebeacon2 Nice, try, kid. I know for a fact that in no way can a plane fly passengers without a pilot always on duty.
Your argument falls apart, that automation program just crash in daylight.
So yeah, it's not 100% safe, and accountability has to be put first.
Teslas make horrible cars and hide behind the illusion of knowledge, which is stupidity.
If you fly planes and you deemed it's okay for the auto pilot here just crash and still use it, you should be disqualified.
If the plane malfunction, the manufacturing company shall be sued, massively, despite pilot or not. Tesla intentionally avoid the law by adding the "hands on wheel" despite knowing that it's impossible to do anything if it it malfunction".
Go back to school, kid.
Pathetic, go back to school, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What happens when there's a sudden shortage of electricity worldwide?
Your little bitcoin and blockchain will be what then?
Putting values into something that can't be touched, can't be protect is full of risks.
Bitcoin won't go, a simple clue, when the transactions from fiat happens, countries that haven't had a good footing in the storage shall not comply, it's easier to create an entire new kind of money then comply with an existing one. For example, if China, Japan, entire Asia gathers around and release a new type of coin, and the coin alone can regulate, the bitcoin will become worthless.
1
-
@dimension9195 It's not about shortage of electricity, it's about shortage of massive amount of electricity. Bitcoin mining alone is like the amount of energy of Japan, if we normalized that coin, the amount of energy will likely to be 10 times, maybe 100 times. Do some math, electricity isn't borned from thin air, there will be a time when electricity, large amount can not spend on just that coin alone. Electricity shortage will come if you keep wasting electricity. What happened to logic and mathematics?
And like I said, the risk of having a better coin, the better coin backed by numerous sources, better benefits can evaporate any value stored in another coin. So your wealth can be evaporated too quickly.
Full of risks, apparently no solution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@OK-yy6qz That's another lie, pal. All the alternative energy source, especially solar is now powerful enough to have the same efficiency of conversion as natural gas or coal.
Sure, you can only collect 20% of energy coming from the sun, but you can only collect 20% of energy if you burn coal to heat up steam and then to turn the turbine.
The point is that solar is far more expensive. However, it is infinite amount of energy, and if it needs be, people can easily produce solar panels for free. Just like how during Covid, certain companies donated vaccines to other countries without charge.
Again, Tesla did far more to transform the world to EVs than Nissan ever can. Nissan is selling Nissan Leaf for a loss to green wash their brand while still profiting from internal combustion engine.
Tesla offers a product with far, far superior range and charging time compared to Nissan, and the more EVs there are, the more important that becomes, because it reduces how many times you have to charge your car, increasing battery life cycle. Tesla EVs last about 3 times the lifespan of a Nissan Leaf. And no, Tesla does not use 3 times the number of batteries, that's not how it works. They just have superior technology.
So sure, Nissan is making vehicles for "the middle class", but they're also wasting lithium, another finite energy.
Go learn some math, pal. Tesla Model Y is the most popular car in Europe for a reason, it is the most superior car on the market, the Europeans have never fallen to the American Marketing Trap, so for them to abandon Mercedes and Volkswagen and choose Tesla, it says something.
Go learn some math, show some respect.
1
-
1
-
@awesomefacepalm Again, that's not the point of Tesla.
You're more likely to be harm due to lack of oil than of climate change.
Elon Musk is saving the world, but not because of environmental changes.
It's because oil is a finite valuable resource.
Now lithium is also finite, but there are other ways of making batteries, but there's no way of replacing oil.
Sustainable energy has nothing to do with environmental friendly.
Sustainable means sustainable. Electricity is an infinite amount of energy, that's sustainable.
Go learn some math, pal. Show some respect. Your green fantasy has nothing to do with saving the world.
And no, there isn't.
There are no electric vehicles on the market that waste less resources as Tesla. Because Tesla is the longest range vehicles per lithium mass, means less charging cycle, means the longest battery life, means the least wasteful of resources.
Show some respect, you degenerate.
1
-
1
-
@awesomefacepalm Really? Worst built yet highest safety score? And in case you hadn't noticed, pal. People in Europe just ditch their own manufacturer like Volkswagen and Mercedes and make Tesla Model Y the most popular car in the continent.
And go learn some physics, pal. Only using renewables can create a stable energy grid if you have a place to store the excess energy. before distributing it elsewhere.
And having a backup power plant just in case, maybe nuclear, maybe hydroelectric. As long as you have a overwhelming majority sustainable energy source, that's the dream. And of course it also satisfy your green fantasy, not that it matters.
The key isn't to reduce pollution, go learn some math, the key is to move the world away from wasting their oil to make useless products. Oil is crucial to make certain products in the modern world, so how about you stop wasting it to move a car? The key lies in harnessing an infinite source of electricity instead of relying on a finite source.
Energy from the sun is infinite, Silicon is infinite. Gas, Coal, Oil is finite
That's the point of Electric Vehicles, that's how Musk is saving the world.
And yes, range per kg of lithium is everything, pal, because lithium is also finite. So by having less range, you're definitely wasting more finite resources as well because your battery last less. Lithium is not a sustainable natural resources, not as important as oil but you have to use it wisely. After Musk is done changing the car industry, he'll go into making a better battery.
If you're an engineer, do the simple math. Tesla has the best product on the market, the math is clear.
1
-
@awesomefacepalm No, you're the uninformed and incompetent person here. To say that Tesla has the worst build is a purely subjective statement, there is no score on build quality. But we do know that all of their cars received decent safety ratings. And there's no such thing as a brand having the highest score, because one brand releases multiple models, and the score is on the specific model line, not the brand.
Stop spreading lies, pal. According to Euro NCAP standard right now, Tesla Model Y and Model S has the highest score.
So stop spreading lies. And another stupid statement of how solar energy can't be recycled. Hey dummy, energy is not an appliances, you can't recycle energy, you use energy to power devices, to light up the bulb. If you're talking about how recycling solar panel is tougher than recycling a coal burner than you're an idiot, because a solar panel recycling causes much less pollution than the coal that a coal powerplant burns.
Wind is a stupid way of harnessing energy so I don't know what you're talking about. Solar is the way.
But then again, the pollution you're talking is the current lack of processing technique, which at any means gives out less carbon dioxide than burning coal or burning gas, or burning oil.
You're a degenerate because your opinions are full of lies, wrong according to reality, and portrays really poor intellectual capability.
There's no hype here, mathematically this is future, you'll run out of coal, gas oil way before you run out of silicon and solar energy. So the sooner you do it, the better.
You push in the "green" nonsense for no reason. It's not about green, dummy, it's about conserving the finite resources that we need by not using them wastefully. And that is oil, natural gas and lithium.
Show some respect, you degenerate. The math is clear. Switching to sustainable energy not because of their greeness, but because of sustainability as in, we're not running out of those kind of energy. We can handle unprocessed landfill, we can not handle wasting oil.
So again, show some respect, you degenerate. You're a degenerate not because you have a different opinion, it's because you're full of lies and you're intellectually inferior. Sad, isn't it.
1
-
@awesomefacepalm The by default, Tesla is the best build quality because their car brands have only existed for a few years and the life cycle of their cars hasn't been done thoroughly yet, dummy. If a company newly released a car, the number of repair is zero, because the cars hasn't been through that long.
Go learn some math. I don't know what research you're talking about. Quote an article, where is it, what kind of measurement is that? Is it your make belief?
And Mercedes is not even close to the best in reliability, pal, if best build means least repair. It's Toyota and Honda that reign supreme. Stop spreading lies.
I don't care what you're obligated to, this is the truth.
EVs are as sustainable as people claim, because its core components are infinite resorces, solar energy makes infinite electricity. Silicon is infinite because it's the third most popular chemical on the planet.
Mathematically EVs are the most sustainable vehicles on Earth. Maybe Hydrogen cell is a bit better but currently it's a bit too expensive. Tesla is sort of expensive but the cost went down dramatically to an acceptable range.
But again, whatever the future is, it will run on electricity, because electricity can be produced infinitely.
So go learn some math, darling. Show some respect, you degenerate, the math is clear.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@awesomefacepalm It's not an opinion, pal. You think rock music is better than pop music, that's an opinion.
To deny gravity or the nature of energy conservation is spreading lies. Massive difference. Now you may hate Tesla, but to say that they're not saving the world is just insane and is a reality denier.
The world, if we keep using oil wastefully, will run into a tragic end, because oil is crucial to modern society. So by making the world using less oil, Tesla is "saving the world".
Now you may think that I'm rude, that's your opinion, I don't have any problem that. But I know for a fact, that what you said were wrong.
You have absolutely nothing to offer more about the dialogue, I've seen enough from your false statements and detachment from reality.
"range isn't everything", "renewable energy isn't stable", "solar and wind cause more pollution than coal and oil".
I mean, trying to take an advice from you is like asking a 5th grader to fix your car.
Go study more math, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nunyabiznez6381 There are more than 200 sovereign nations in the world darling, and no, not nearly half of them changed to rail. The entire South East Asia section, Middle East, Russia, South America, Canada, they don't have high speed trains.
Answer: Not necessary, unprofitable and nobody really need use of them.
You think Americans are in desperate need to travel across states in a hurry? A few businessman going between states are not the same as the wish and need of dozens of millions of people who mostly live in self dependent community.
You can live your entire life having your business in just one state, that's how vast America is, and that's how wasteful your land usage is, it's stupidity but it's your choice.
How about you learn some math, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PrimitiveFuturologist_YTC You're just highly delusional, pal. Your sources and quotes don't mean anything because you're quoting the wrong source.
You're misunderstanding the entire conversation, it doesn't matter where a bunch of anthropoids come from, maybe it's Africa, but maybe it could've been Asia, earliest, not only. Learn to read.
What matters is that human civilization as in reasoning, logic, order. Those didn't start in Africa, it started everywhere, earliest was Asia.
Culture has nothing to do with origin of species, and what does origin of species have to do with anything? Life all starts under the ocean? Isn't origin of life cover the origin of species. Idiot. Humans are deemed to be special because of our thoughts, not because we're anthropoids.
If you can't argue about the main point, don't pretend that you are.
1
-
@PrimitiveFuturologist_YTC Wow, you're really dumb, aren't you. Keep rambling on about trivial stuff that you can't even see that they're just trivial stuff.
Hey, idiot. Why the hell does it matter where they come from ? If you're stating that it's because those the owner of the land than you're dead wrong. The land is for whoever took it.
Your entire research, is a useless thing used to trick little kids, stop it pal. It won't work. It doesn't matter where they come from, Africa, Asia, they could be from Atlantis and it would make no difference to the position they're in. But stating that they're from Africa, first of all, doesn't mean anything. Think about it.
And you too be honest, after reading the latest and utterly useless reply, have shown that you're no better than just a 5 year old with an IPad.
Copying anything you could see in an online research without knowing what it means. Using words maybe taken from a Shakespeare work pretending to be more than average. You're pathetic.
If you can't type anything decent, kid. I advise you to go back to school.
Just answer the question, is it more important to know where anthropoids come from, or is it more important to know where ancient civilizations was formed? Idiot.
Oh, and yes, human thoughts made us special, maybe other creatures have some kind language, but none of those creatures are intellectually capable of doing the things we do. So applying relative comparison, yes we are special comparing to them. Get it, kid. It's called math. Go back to school and learn it.
Like I said, here's an ancient Chinese saying for you. If you know say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how you know.
You don't know anything, pal, try getting a homo erectus quote against that and then it'll be utterly clear. Pathetic!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@edmund6392 Actually, Russia has about more than enough grain, barley, all sort of agriculture product, including dairy, and furthermore, Western sanction doesn't apply to the Chinese government, therefore nobody will be short of anything.
Get off of your delusions, darling. Russia doesn't really need you. You does need Russia, how's the gasoline prices going?
The only consumer products that's rising in prices in Russia is imported goods that nobody really needs, Russian pasta is not as fancy as Italian pasta but they'll survive.
Meanwhile in America, gasoline is going up and up, leading to everything else going way up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Van Yaeger The unfortunate thing is that such society doesn't exist, because humans are destined to be classified into the worthy and the unworthy.
You work, I work harder, smarter I worth more than you.
That's simple, anything short of that is called slavery. Rich people don't start from rich, only a small amount of heirs and heiress are, normal people, if they don't keep creating wealth, they will go bankrupt. Would you yell at a doctor's face telling them that they're stealing from you? Despite saving people's lives for it?
Why are you using YouTube? I thought the rich steals from you? YouTube is provided by billionaires, they're stealing, right? Idiot.
1
-
Van Yaeger Nice try, pal, that's just pure stupidity. You're not slave to anything except yourselves. How do you explain lawyers making 10 times your salary if they're not paid what they're worth?
How about get out of the bubble, what you're paid is what you actually worth, you want to know why? Because you can just quit and they'll find the next person immediately, you're not special, the value you add is not enough for people to pay you more.
Study more, pal, how can you say that they don't pay what you worth? Who defines your worth? Yourself? Society values you at that much, that's what you worth. If you quit and nothing happens, then society decides that you worth nothing.
Is it moral, yes, because it applies to everybody, you're free to start your own business, do it, but by doing so, you take the risks, you value anything using your own money to pay.
Yang basic income is called stealing, you steal from people to give to other people, there's another term for that, slavery.
And if your fake math is like 10% VAT, therefore 2 trillion dollars, use your brain, the country don't spend 20 trillion dollars on expenditures. Learn real math, pal.
You're not oppressed, you're just worthless, it's harsh but it's the truth.
You don't know real oppression and hardship, go to China, Vietnam, those places don't care of your value and the people has to work as hard as they can hoping to get noticed, not to be paid what they're worth, but to get noticed, why? Because even when they're noticed, there are countless just like them for the same position. Ask yourself, if you quit, can anybody take your place with no considerable damage, if the answer is yes then you're not undervalued, you're low value.
Don't blame people if you're stupid and inadequate, enslave the few people who are creating most of the wealth to satisfy the useless? It's a worse picture than slavery.
At least in slavery, the slave masters had the brains to utilize the slave's work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kristiansandsmark2048 I will give you an actually way better explanation, buddy. Russian is behind because you got a 70 year behind start due to the existence of the Soviet Union communist state and then the tragic 1990s mainly created by the US insane foreign policy of oppression.
So you're totally wrong on why Russia is not prosperous, you're pretending as if this is a fair race and it's Russia inherent flaws that make them not prosperous, that's just childish and totally wrong.
Russia is getting more and more prosperous by the year. They're behind because they're starting 70 years late, but they're catching and they will catch up. Natural resources is just one of many factors that are accelerating Russia's growth. They have surpassed Germany in becoming the 5th largest economy worldwide when you measure economy via production.
And they're world leaders in Nuclear Technology by a gigantic margin.
So buddy, yes, we know more than this very average professor that is respected by literally no one around the globe.
Buddy, trade, whether free, or restricted, whether by land or by sea has been around for millenia. And there are many forms of it that are capable of bringing prosperity. Do not mistaken the current US led system as the only viable trade system, that's absurd in so many ways.
You need a serious fundamental education in what economy, trade, power, means, because you're using really outdated as well as proven to be false concepts. You're living in a bubble.
1
-
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most delusional point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies".
I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it.
The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what leads to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses.
Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind.
So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West.
Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2.
Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining.
Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it.
Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple, and this simplicity shall break your fantasy completely. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia.
But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US.
So get over yourself, buddy, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
-
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most delusional point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies".
I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it.
The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what led to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses.
Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind.
So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West.
Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2.
Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining.
Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it.
Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia.
But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US.
So get over yourself, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
-
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most inaccurate point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies".
I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it.
The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what led to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses.
Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind.
So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West.
Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2.
Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining.
Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it.
Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia.
But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US.
So get over yourself, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
-
1
-
Oh, please, as soons as others media corporate start to develope the same type of application featuring their kind of shows, in the past, present and future, Netflix would be kicked aside. Netflix can only go this far because the others are yet to catch up with the trend, Disney is following quite close, when Disney take all of their Disney production, including Pixar, Lucasfilm, Marvel off the app, the shares will go down, and then when Disney starts to produce another Disney Original that has the same quality, Netflix will lost it's edge. Soon the others will follow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@guacamole456 No, Japan doesn't build house with wood, pal. This isn't the 1700s, The only reason, if there's any why the Japanese would build their houses with woods is to maintain tradition, they build their traditional house with woods, because their traditional houses with traditional techniques uses wood.
Meanwhile in the US, your houses have no tradition, you're just building it poorly, due to how the construction companies are not focused into one but spreaded out throughout the country.
If the Earthquake is in 2008, then the hospitals and schools that collapsed there was built in the 1990s or early 2000s. That's 23 years ago or more. Catch up with the time, homie. China now and China 23 years ago are vastly different.
It is you who needs to study math, physics, basic logical thinking ability before making any claims. And furthermore, that one corruption scandal at that one province at that one time doesn't represent the entire industry of a country of 1.4 billion people. This is where math comes into play by the way.
Just because there are a school shooter in the US then you would conclude that the entire US is filled with child murderers?
Come on, homie.
Here's a simple example for you, their train station is more impressive than your airports, and I mean it. It's not even close. The Chinese currently holds the records for some of the most impressive engineering features in the world, for example, out of the world 100 highest bridges, 40 of them are in one single Chinese province, and they're all built over the mountainous area.
Look, pal, this isn't even debatable, unless you're totally blind, the difference is too big.
The Chinese infrastructure today makes the US look like it's 20 years behind, and it is, not just in bridges, but buildings, highways, rails, ports, EV facilities, even internet.
1
-
1
-
@guacamole456
sure, if you want to make the argument of cost then it's shocking how your country can't seem to manufacture steel and concrete at a low price. So thank you for proving my point there. Inferior technology.
Excuse me, do not confuse partnership with "supervision". It's a partnership that can be replaced if the US companies don't want to join. Depends on the kind of industry, the Chinese have their counterparts or they can use other country counterparts. America doesn't have monopoly on any industrial field, pal.
Regarding to your argument about US infrastructure upgrade, that's a horrible comparison, because even the upgrade cannot match up with the Chinese tech.
Yes, China has a boom, meaning that for now, they're the dominant force in civil infrastructure. You can wait 50 years and then maybe America will be the dominant force. But not now. Right now, you're not even second best.
And by the way, civil infrastructure doesn't go through cycles, it goes through cycles if there is a breakthrough or rapid change in technology. And there is major change in the last 30 years. But nobody knows if there's going to be a rapid change in the next 30 years, throughout 4000 years history, maybe houses in 1440 doesn't differ that much from the buildings in 1490
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's not how it works, little dummy.
The great minds of history have been everywhere around the world, depending on which places have the best condition to develop, the best minds have been Egypt, China, Greek, Rome, Europe, America.
The only reason great minds now come to America is because of America safe conditions during the second world war, which drives the best mind from Europe to America and they stayed in America and develop the necessary conditions for equality great minds to come to America since World War 2 till now.
The Pinnacle of human civilization changes from time to time, doesn't mean people at those places are superior of any means.
Go learn some math, little darling.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wyrmofvt Advertisers follow the user number, pal.
You actually think advertisers will just leave Twitter altogether despite it's users number growing everyday?
Keep it real, homie.
Advertisers leaving are temporary, users staying is long term. That's the difference.
Advertisers follow the users.
I don't know why you think Twitter tried to get any of the employee back, Maybe for legal reasons of law suits but it's pretty clear Twitter do not need them in the first place, so get out of that bubble.
The only employees being begged back is Ligma and Johnson, which if you don't get the joke, it's quite sad.
Twitter, or Musk himself has more than enough capital and credit line to survive the next year, as long as the users are there, money flows in eventually, that's the point of social media company. So you need to learn better math. The revenue might be down for the last month, but it's still far beyond what is needed to keep the company afloat, now they've reuduced about 50% of operating cost.
The checkmark debacles occured in 4 days, removed immediately, soon to be re-launched, advertisers left, but they will return. The key is the number of user grew.
You get that?
It was a disaster to you woke warriors because now you can't censure people for no reason anymore, but we don't care about you.
Whatever make belief you're trying to sell, it's not real.
The users are growing, therefore advertisers will be flooding back in, that's what advertisers do, they're prostitutes looking for the best way to promote their products, they follow the users.
So unless there's a massive drop in number of users or a systematic crash, which is impossible because even the most basic startup company can handle that no problem, the company is doing fine.
Facebook and Twitter are what you called stable monopoly. If you don't do anything too extreme , the companies run itself and generate steady cash.
Now Elon is trying to impose some changes, but none of those are extreme changes, Dorsey the dummy imposed certain changes that were extreme and alienated nearly half of the US population and the world population by engaging in woke activism, Elon is changing that, and therefore bringing the company back on track.
What part of "your feelings don't matter" don't you get?
USERS NUMBER GREW, we outnumber you by a lot.
1
-
1
-
@wyrmofvt There are so many faults within your comment is that it's just kind of sad.
So I'm just going to take the most significant one and shred it apart.
The kind of users Twitter is attracting are people who believe in free speech, free of information, free from censuring. Those are the people who actually have the money to spend on things, they're working people.
It's not you who are buying products, you people are broke ass activists who took out a loan to study gender something and are now crying of how unfair the world is. And that is just sad.
There are always open inside of any saturated market. If Nike doesn't want to advertise to working people, Adidas or Under Armor will. If those advertisers are not focusing on their business and are more concerned with woke activism, they will be beaten.
Like when the CEO of Goya Foods endorsed Trump and their products expanded like never before.
Again, we outnumber you by a lot. Even if you don't use Twitter, as a whole population pool of America, we still outnumber you by a gigantic margin, people who just want to work and live, people who don't want anybody to interfere in their business unnecessarily.
Users number grew, even if the current big businesses don't want to advertise here, other businesses will. If a company put their political preferences above customers satisfaction, they lose their customers.
You think the advertisers that have left are important? They're not important. Next man up.
1
-
@wyrmofvt Are you one of those reality deniers, pal?
He got the degree of Physics and Business from University of Pennsylvania, got accepted into Physics PhD programs at Stanford, so he is a physicist by training.
He studied by himself to be a computer programmer, not just at PayPal, but at his first company, zip2, which made him a millionaire, he's also the original programmer at the company so he is a computer programmer, you nitwit.
He is a car designer, Tesla was a joke until Elon took over and changed the company's entire direction into populous consumer vehicle
The Tesla founders were losers, they have trademarked the name, but the guy who made that changes was Elon.
And yes, Elon was a rocket designer at SpaceX, he founded the company and oversaw productions of their first few launches. His contribution is immeasurable, quoted by SpaceX cofounder. He founded a company that made things that was thought to be impossible. The reason it's thought to be impossible because everybody in the industry did things one way until Musk showed up.
So again, are you a reality denier or you're just an Elon hater?
1
-
@wyrmofvt Kid, none of your criticism makes any sense, they deny reality, they deny facts.
They demonstrated the lack of the most basic of knowledge.
If you think Musk contribution is zero in the formation of his miraculous company, you're insane.
Countless people had money before, nobody could have done what Musk did. Literally nobody.
Peter Thiel had money, Bill Gates had money, a lot more people used to be richer than Elon failed to achieve anything close to what he did.
So I wonder where this blind sense of hatred is coming from?
You got swindled by Elon when he promoted doge coin?
Tesla is the most profitable car company right now excluding past debt.
SpaceX is the world leading company in reusable rocket launch, main contractor of NASA.
PayPal or whatever it used to be, even if his code weren't that good, he still took part in accelerating its formation in the industry, demonstrated by the money PayPal had to pay him to kick him out.
So if you're a troll, I suggest you stop. If you're a sane person, wake up.
You can say that Mark Zuckerberg got lucky and he doesn't know what he's doing, you can say that about Bill Gates when he lost Microsoft monopoly in search engines. But to say that of Elon is just really dumb. He is by far the most competent human being in running businesses and improves them greatly in the world.
Yeah, he may hype up his stocks and he has a bunch of cult followers, but doesn't mean his companies aren't the best.
Tesla Model Y is the best selling car in Europe, the first time ever a non European car brand take that spot.
Show some respect, you degenerate.
1
-
@wyrmofvt You see what coming? 8$ verification fake account?
Anybody can see that coming.
That's why he's getting new features, where celebrities verification are different colors, official organization verifications are different colors.
What's the problem then?
Pal, he made one mistake, in retrospect, charging fee for verification is the correct move but it was too soon.
But hey, like I said, relaunch next week.
Nothing significant happened.
The same thing with massive employee laid off, the people who quit are not missed at all, good bye.
Elon even offered them money to quit, so again, nothing happened.
Advertisers didn't pay attention to what Elon was doing, maybe some advertisers did paid attention but those are no where near all of them. 14 out of top 50, which means about 25%, next man up.
The other 75% didn't do anything and new advertisers will keep coming as long as there are more users. Those are very sane prediction.
It's a stable monopoly.
You are no position to define which speech is smart and which speech isn't, you are frankly intellectually average.
So get down from your high horse, pal.
Users number grew, advertisers will go back in. If 14 out of top 50 advertisers went out, it means 36 out of those 50 advertisers stayed in, and other advertisers shall take the place of the other 14, because that's what companies do.
As always, advertisers follow users, those other 36 advertisers obviously do not share the panic mentality the other 14 shows.
So is there something wrong?
Twitter exists just fine with the other 36 top advertisers and future advertisers coming in, so say goodbye to the ones who left and they'll be easily replaced.
As long as Twitter grow, advertisers will be forced to come there. Go learn some math, pal. That's how social media works.
Facebook might have lost 15% of it's advertising revenue just last year, but the company is still in deep cash, as long as they don't burn it in the Metaverse.
Anyone can fail, correct. But the probability of a loser like you failing is infinitely more than a person like Elon with proven track records of creating miracles.
Show some respect, you degenerate.
1
-
@wyrmofvt And no, I just don't reply to most of your points because your foundational point is already false.
Advertisers always follow users.
All the companies that pulled their ads all come with a statement, we're currently pausing activities until we know the direction of Twitter.
Now they do, Twitter is exactly the same as it used to be before Dorsey engaged in extreme woke activism, which is stupid. Yes, Twitter removes violence, criminal content, but censoring public figures? That's just too much.
And at that time, advertisers still came to Twitter, as they will keep doing now.
Show some respect, you degenerate, it's just a social media company.
That's it, there's nothing revolutionary about it, it's a gimmick company with a large user database. If you can learn how to build cheaper functional rockets, you can learn how to manage a social media company.
1
-
@wyrmofvt Again, there are too many stupidity and false belief in your writing to counter so I'm again going to pick out the most significant thing and shread it to pieces.
Elon Musk is the chief desginer of SpaceX first ever launches, he hired the engineers that nobody thought were capable of doing anything, and he led them to build a miracle company. The guys that come to work for SpaceX were the guys that were not good enough for NASA.
A few hundred guys at NASA were more experienced, were better than the SpaceX engineers, so what's the distinguishable factor?
It's Elon Musk. He ordered the engineer to do a certain design that they themselves didn't know was possible or not. And he was right, time after time after time.
That's the difference, a guy with the vision can hire a bunch of lackies to do the work. The chief engineer doesn't do the common labour work. That's what losers like you are for, assuming you can qualify for those roles, you probably don't. See the difference in class?
Regarding to Twitter advertisers, they're still there, if 14 out of the top 50 advertisers left, 36 stayed, and the profit that comes from that 36 is more than enough to be profitable, as long as they cut the unnecessary spendings, for example, the woke employees and their free meals who are not necessary.
So like I said, the sane advertisers outnumber the woke advertisers by a lot as well. Just like us sane users outnumber you lunatics by a gigantic margin.
You wouldn't have done a better job, you're a troll, a sad person that hide yourself from reality because you refuse to recognize your own insignificance. Go study some math, small time troll.
1
-
@wyrmofvt 14 out of top 50 advertisers paused their ads. The remaining 36 is enough to keep the company afloat for now. And it's only going to get better with the next verification system of coloring.
You can't make a fake account anymore with this system because to get different checkmarks, you have to provide the same kind of documents to get verified as before.
More cash-flow, more users. It hurts your feelings more but nobody cares.
Advertisers follow users, it always have and always will, the 36 who remains are proof, they are big businesses, they spend big and they must stay.
Not to mention a lot of businesses stopped advertising because of the fraud checkmark mistakes, which will be fixed nextweek by the coloring system, you can't fake that anymore. Fake accounts won't have the same color mark as the real ones and they'll be removed quickly anyways. Easy fix, more money by doing very little work.
So again, Twitter is exactly the same as last year, with more users, different verification system that brings in more money, less censorships, and a lot less operating cost.
It hurts your feelings but like I said, we don't really care.
1
-
@wyrmofvt Still too many false belief that I'm not going to address.
The advertisers that left are Mars, Jeep, Merk, Verizon,...
Which some are big, but the ones who stayed are a lot bigger.
Nestle, , Unilever, Kraft Heinz, Comcast,....
Whatever fantasy you're having about all the important advertisers left, they're not real. So yeah, that foundation is wrong. You not realizing it makes you a troll, or you're just incredibly dumb and that's even worse.
Look at the platform, pal. More users, less woke employees, less censorships. People equate blue with verified, and the fake accounts won't be getting a blue checkmark, they'll be getting a yellow or green one. 8 main color shade in the observable light spectrum, means you can color the same symbol 8 different kind, leading to 8 category of verification ranking.
The fake accounts will be paying for dead last ranking and that's just free money for Twitter, because within the terms of service, it will be amended that if you purchase a checkmark and use it to impersonate people, you won't get a refund.
Numbers speak for itself. The advertisers who temporarily pauses for about 2 whole weeks now are not even the biggest ones. So again, your argument fell apart because you're too lazy or to dumb to search up simple facts.
We don't really care that your feelings are hurt, we do care that you're spreading lies, that's just uncool.
Go learn some math, you degenerate, can't keep lying in real life like this. You are troll because you're denying reality, quoting lies, making up numbers to back up your made up belief, that's what makes you're a troll.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, the CNN guy didn't read the report, or he's playing dumb to brushing up Cortez's ass. Anybody who actually read and still claim to be "supporting" of it is plain lying, and it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@charles No, Russia doesn't want to own that backward ass country, there's nothing valuable there at all except history. If needs be, they will liberate Crimea and Dobass and then decimate every other region, because without Donbass and Crimea, Ukraine is a useless country with no ocean access.
No countries want to invade another countries for economic purpose anymore, pal, there's too little benefits in it, except for a strategic defense purpose. With Russia controlling all the strategic military location, Ukraine as a military threat is eliminated. the Nazi government can stay in the region close to Poland, basically a useless part of the country.
Kiev will fall, very soon. One way or another, if Russia wants to decimate that city, killing hundreds of thousands, they can do it very easily.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mike Turner Again, get a real job, maybe something that doesn't make statistical claim from grammar, you're just a total buffoon typing that. And secondly, learn how to argue, typing words in the correct order doesn't make you a smarter person, btw "efficient people", it's called sarcasm, moron. Thirdly, "data scientists", you might want to look up more numbers even though you clearly do not have any idea what those numbers mean, this is not the first "teachers protest", there has been more in the last 9 years, and guess what? Every single time, it's the same, they whine, they whine, they quit, because they don't need them for minimal survival. If they can actually produce "efficient" people, it's due to human instinct that we would have given them the budget, pal, search more statistics, some of them are fully funded and guess what, the products stayed almost the same. Class supplies? Have you ever seen Asian schools, they have class 2 times your size and teachers teach at multiple schools and like win way more intellectual awards for high school students. Don't blame the fund. Finally, learn how to think before typing, typing words in the correct order doesn't make you smarter, it's make you more pathetic paying attention to insignificant details, and who knows, maybe I don't double check my reply because you, a "data scientist", do not worth my time, heck, you should be glad that I even reply to you. With your nonsensical claim and Wikipedia paraphrasing others would have just delete your reply, it's easy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thechuube8442 No, kid. Kyle knowingly do something legal and responded to criminal doing illegal things in an illegal way.
He put himself in danger intentionally, however, it is the fault of those rioters, those criminals who make public places a dangerous place. You can't attack somebody for no reason, doing something illegal and then ask for the law protection.
Normal person saw a young man was exercising his right of self defense against criminals, kid. It is his right to do so. If anybody else choose to put themselves into a legal location where there are criminals, it is their right to knowingly put themselves in that dangerous location and they are entitled to exercise self defense against criminals in that location.
Just because South Boston has a higher crime rate than Washington, does it mean people can not go to South Boston, where crimes tend to happen more regularly and exercise their right to self defense?
Wisconsin is a open carry state, legal gun, legal location, innocent citizen. The only illegal thing was the rioters.
Go back to school, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, Scott Sealey,
Based on your ridiculous comment, I could deduced that you're below average human being who has no understanding in legal problems as well as moral problems.
Funny thing, you can't accuse somebody of murder if there's no proof, in this case, there hasn't been a motive yet. So the whole thing about murdering, at least pay attention to OJ.
Next, maybe it was an accident, maybe it was not, what proof do you have to say that the police department not firing her is wrong? She was off duty, so that's a personal event, would you be fired if you get in a car accident?
Again, go back to school. If you don't know anything about this event, it's better to stop typing nonsense, it's pathetic.
1
-
1
-
Hey kid, use your brain, police faces constant danger for being a police, it's an instinct formed through years of active serving to the nation. You might know about it if you think a little bit. Therefore the action of shooting somebody, to you, might means killing, because in your little world, there's no evil surrounding trying to kill you. But in a police uniform, again, use your brain, there's a law authorizing them to use firearms whenever they're in a danger situation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lazarus2691 No, pal, that's not how it goes.
Trend is just a trend, once it goes out, the company will tank, if your company depends on a trend, it will go out of business once the trend changes. Trend changes easily.
Battery charging is a myth, kid, where do you think electricity comes from? Trees?
Market size won't increase by much, but the supplies and production will have to increase, that gets you to a steady loss of money.
Don't think it's just simple as making a car and sell it, it's not.
1
-
1
-
@lazarus2691 The price of electricity is still cheap due to the lack of high demands, pal. If everybody switches to EVs, the price won't be low. 40% of the energy being consume in this country comes from gasoline. If you eliminate gasoline, you'll need the extra 40% in some sort of energy. Natural gas took account for only 31%, so it has to increase more than 100% of natural gas production, which is not feasible, because by the graph, seemingly it will take 20-30 more years to increase production by that much. And not to mention if you don't do gasoline, a bunch of industrial process shall be eliminated.
Petroleum refining is necessary not just to make gasoline, it's also plastics, polymer, the entire industrial process rely on petroleum. If you cut out the profit from gasoline because you want EVs, you will disrupt the chain and many, many products nowadays shall have an increase in price.
And about the trend thing, apparently you have no idea how car manufacturing works.
And your stock price, it's a piece of paper, man, if you cash it in then it's more like stealing than actually making profit. The stock doesn't make company profitable, high stock price means more people are thinking that it worth something. It doesn't actually worth much, because it has nothing to back up. Anything gain through short time can disappear through short time. Don't be proud of being a con man.
The adoption curve has always been inverted, you can see this clearly through the staggering amount of failed scientific breakthroughs.
About car production. Market size won't increase, but production has to, otherwise you're standing still, and that's loosing money and time. The equivalent value from the chain of manufacturing is in the products it created. If you stop manufacturing due to "thinking that there's no demand", the chain of production will keep wasting money. Because the cost of maintaining it keeps going up, yet it doesn't create anymore value.
It's not as simple as "no more demand than no supply, pal". If you don't supply, you waste the investment. You need to create demands otherwise you will sink.
The money Tesla put into the factories haven't been repaid. If they stop manufacturing, means no more demand, and no more backup values, such as cars already made, then the company's only asset is a chain of production that doesn't produce anything.
Your math on solar panel. That's false math. You're calculating the "current average". Right now they only put solar panels in place that has the most benefits, so the benefits is at maximum. Once you expand, the majority of places shall not reach that maximum, eventually it will hit a curve where the cost of putting more solar panel is more than the electricity can cover. That's why there isn't mass solar panel farms.
Sunlight density is an issue, man. Go put a solar panel in London, you'll see.
Your math is false because you ignored such factors.
The cost of solar continue to drop at where it is feasible. Places that it's not feasible, the cost will rise. Do more research, pal.
And your bad math also ignored how multiple buildings in this country are well, "buildings". Dozens of household under one roof, but that roof, even by your fake math best calculation, can only cover one household.
Do more research, pal.
1
-
1
-
@RZakelis My statement is based on facts. Your statement is based on fantasy.
Because you live in a fantasy that the GDP is measured via the dollars, and military capability is measured on also spending on the dollars and you think the only tech in the world is the one coded within software.
That's an adorable fantasy worthy of 3 year old. That's just sad.
The economy is not measured via the dollars, darling. Go learn real economy. America is still among the top economy, but it's nowhere near the best, because it's totally not independent and can't manufacture necessities.
America military is also nowhere near the best, actually you're one of the worst, because you spend 10 times all the countries combined to get the similar, sometimes worse results. Military capability is not measured by airplanes as well, doesn't matter how expensive that plane is. Your countries spent it last 30 years doing nothing significant except bullying poor countries.
Technologically, the core technology of semiconductors and physical manufacturing, your country are way behind. The tech products in Silicon Valley aren't special, they are the dominating one right now not because they're special, it's because they're services companies with the most users. Such users can easily leave if push comes to shove.
You can leave Google or Facebook in preference of Weibo or TikTok, all Chinese. But you can't leave the use of oil in Saudi Arabia or manufacturing of goods in China.
Go learn some math, hombre. You live in a Hollywood movie, and it's bad movie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, point out the lies, morons, which lies, which part of their reporting isn't true? Don't make up things and then pretend they're facts.
Murdoch doesn't run Fox News, moron, he owns Fox News, a billionaire has a lot more things to do than participating in a branch of a sub company that he resign from. You're linking irrelevant facts and assumptions using more assumptions, which isn't deduction. It's delusional. If your theory is true than the reporting of Fox News need to be constant with Murdoch's agenda, which is total lie, because FOX News is never constant, the strategy of the cable just changed earlier this year, if you had watched them, you would know.
Your hypothesis would be correct with CNN, MSNBC, CBS, why, because those channels aren't doing news reporting. But not Fox News, want to point out their "lies", go ahead, you can't. at least not since their latest change in strategy earlier this year on reporting facts and logic.
And a sound advice, don't take Quora Q&As as proof, they're not. Like I said, go back to school.
1
-
Joker 23
Okay, now the Joker is using Murphy's law, kid, seriously, go back to school. By your assumption that because something can happen, it happens, then we're all puppets run by giants. Like I said, go back to school, bigger people than him can't even run this country. Gates, Buffet, the Kochs, Soros, all their attempt to make left wing politics a majority can't even win the 2016 election. Like I said, maybe Murdoch want to own the people, but as long as he's doing it using facts, reasons and the truth, we the people accept that. We didn't accept propaganda nonsense back with the Tea Party, like how we don't accept radical mob ruling right now with CNN, MSNBC, CBS.
Ask yourself the question why those people like Murdoch needs this kind of media, why? Because they know that they do not have control over the public, they're trying to, but we all know that it's not gonna work. Murdoch, Soros, Gates, Buffet, Bloomberg, Kochs, despite all their efforts, can not control the country.
And finally, idiot, about proving Fox News is telling the truth, that's not how it works. We assume by default that they're telling the truth, presumption of innocent, that they're doing their jobs, their moral obligations as news organizations is to do factually accurate reporting, you claim otherwise, you need to prove that they're lying. We do it all the time with CNN, MSNBC, CBS. So like I said, if you can't point out anything, accept that your belief is false.
An old Chinese saying for you, "if you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how you know".
I know that you don't know a thing and I just said it.
1
-
Oh, and thinking that something is biased or not isn't thinking at all, it's guessing. You need to point out the bias in the reporting for it to deemed as biased, clear moron? Like I said, it doesn't matter what you think about something, it matters how that thing actually is. Try point out the bias, I dare you, like I said, you can't. And even if you could, which I strongly know that you can't, then I still know that this, Fox News, is the least biased channel there is. Again, don't be pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marigi- National identity doesn't come out of the blue, but they've had centuries to form it and did not form it. Whose fault is that? The British?
If the British had not created Kenya, there would be no Kenya. So I think you owe them a thank you.
Because without colonization, there wouldn't be a country nor a governmental system.
So if it hadn't been for colonization, you would be even more backwards.
So I don't know who you're blaming, the only reason Kenya is a country and not a bunch of tribe crammed together listening to chiefs and warlords is colonization.
So who you're blaming? Now it turns out that only due to colonization do you have a country at all. Before colonization, China is still China, so without colonization, China the country would be in tact.
But without British colonization, Kenya wouldn't even be a country.
So pal, if left alone, Kenya would not be Kenya, it would be tribes of people, not even a country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BrianA-vw2xk
That would be another false assumption of you. If there had been no lack of collaboration, they would have formed a country, pal.
Every kind of society start as conquering other groups of people. That's how the tribe in Africa were formed, that's how kingdoms in China and Europe were formed. You can't keep blaming human basic instinct, pal.
The Kenyans were taking the lands of the Kenyans next to them, by force. Why can't the British take it by force?
The Navajos took the land from the cheyenne , and the Americans took the land from the Navajos, it's a cruel world, pal.
The point here is not whether colonialism is morally justified or not, because everybody was doing it, some were just doing it at a bigger scale. The countries that were colonized, they were the ones invading other smaller communities before the colonization. China for example, That is a fact you can't deny, it happens in every continent, in every stages of history.
So wake up, pal. And to the consequences of colonialism, like I pointed out, other countries got through it easily. It's not the British fault that Kenya were centuries slower than other countries when colonialism happens.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, agents don't mean secret spy, pal.
Agents mean people with associates in Russia, certain foreign affairs officials.
And yes, pal, in order to negotiate foreign policy, you need to have foreign contacts.
You think US ambassador to the UN doesn't have contacts with foreign government officials?
Nice try.
If he did something illegal, you have to use that information on the warrant, and of course, even Obama officials admitted that there isn't a probable cause.
Like I pointed out, get back to facts and realities, kid.
Yeah, he has contacts of Russian government, you know who also has that?
Any counselor to foreign companies have foreign contacts, those are foreign companies.
So wake up, kid.
Every politicians have Russian contacts, they have to negotiate with Russia.
He is a general, so even more dealing with Russia considering military operation.
You know who also has more contact with Russia? Former Secretary of States and right, Hillary Clinton.
Now, we're not investigating those people.
Equal under the law, pal, just because you're delusional doesn't mean that's not a thing.
1
-
Unmasking without probable cause. Regarding Michael Flynn, even FBI officials admitted that he is clean. So wake up, dummy.
Like I pointed out in your pathetic flaws, the only reason you spy on Page is because he was a part of Trump campaign.
Any spying on associates for the reason that they're associates means spying on the thing they're associated with.
Government spying on terrorist contacts means spying on the terrorist.
So get back to logic, kid.
Trump's campaign got contact by the Russian, and the Mueller report proved that there's no collusion.
Your assumption of what collusion is is not how the law works, kid.
Where's the quote of admission of guilt? Seemingly it is so difficult of you idiots to get quotes admitting the guilt? It's always your assumption of what they meant. That's not how it works.
Your example of catching a Predator, in this case, you can't prove and there is no probable reason to believe that it is a conspiracy.
Trump campaign got contacted by the Russians, they didn't come to the Russian, and they didn't do anything with the Russian. Pal, that was the same with Edward Snowden, Snowden sharing information to reporters, that is a crime. But reporters receiving information from Snowden, that is not a crime, because the reported didn't collude with Snowden to steal the information.
How about studying some real law?
Innocent men do fire incompetent people who tried to frame them, like how Yates just admitted that Comey dirty cop did?
You do block testimony of rouge agents who has malicious intent of harming you, and you do not comply with trial that denies due process by not allowing you to call your witnesses.
In the case Maryland vs King, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsburg all ruled that collection of DNA of a free man for no reason than to hopefully solve a crime is a violation of the 4th amendment, unreasonable searches and seizures.
If Trump is charged with a crime, he can be compared to the DNA samples, but comparing random DNA samples for no reason except an allegations, that is called intrusion.
And of course, that case with the rape victim, it is not DNA sample of his semen, like how it was Bill Clinton DNA on Monica Lewinsky's dress?
It was a DNA sample of something that you don't even know, the victim itself can't describe what the situation was like and what part of Trump's DNA was on her dress.
If the DNA is not inside you, under the form of sperm which is the case when comparing real rape victims with reasonably suspected offenders, then the DNA is highly invalid, due to multiple reason why it could be there.
And the exposing of Trump DNA can be used against him to frame him in other cases. If you don't have actual cases with proof to request for that DNA samples, you just can't. Because Trump is protected, like you and me, he is protected by the law.
So wake up, kid. Your arguments aren't arguments, they're bad lies that can be ripped apart easily.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really, people are taking this seriously? The game itself is a bunch of algorithm, and humans can only handle a limited amount of those things. They trick you into believing that anything you do in the game is a result of "creativity". It's not. It's a permutation of algorithms, and sooner or later, the AI's gonna gather enough permutation to defeat any human, not because we're not competent, it's just that what it's design to do. The game isn't actual creativity, it's a hidden form of chess, chess is math, we design computers to handle math that we can't. This is designing a car and race it with a fast runner. Really sad application of AI itself. Try to get better news, Vice News.
1
-
Okay, pal, try to think this, very simple. The game is a game, in can only do what it's programmed to do. The game can't do what isn't allowed, therefore the possibility is limited to the number of possible permutation. And humans, can only handle a number of permutations, and they apply it to compete with each other. Computers can handle all of the the possible permutations, it just takes time. Okay. Isn't that clear enough, they did it in chess, they did it in Go, and they'll do it in games that are disguised but actually are math.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ALUCARDTWILLIGHT You can go to Saint Petersburg and it's mostly the same. Even Mariupol is safer than New York,
The Capital is looked at because the by the image of the Capital can be compared between nations.
Now compare that to London and it's obviously better. If you compare it to every single city in the US, it would still be better, a lot better. Better than Paris and even Berlin, or if you like to compare it to Munich, so be it, or Madrid.
Is it perfect, no, is it better, yes. Nobody stabs you for a hit of joint.
Why don't you grow out of your bubble, homie. There isn't massive unrest in the country, life can be a bit tough but people can deal with that, economy is growing, life quality is getting higher.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, most of them have already done that. If there's no business, there's no cash flow, if there's no cash flow, there's no cash at all. Nobody's getting pay, because there's no cash. Shareholders are loosing money by keep paying workers.
Pal, if you don't bail businesses out, the world around you shall be much worse. Millions shall be unemployed, there's no money anywhere because nobody can work anymore, you've let the businesses went bankrupted.
And your fantasy of making shareholders and the rich "pay" will be just a fantasy. Shareholders and Executives have the least risk if you let them go bankrupt, they already have enough money to live.
The working people shall pay because you let the things that pay them die out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@canyoncity9720 And you can't prove that this is a dictatorship, a dictatorship is really different, you would be a slave if that happens.
The negative things happen because of human flaws, but they need to be cover up to maintain an image of the absolute force, or at least as close as it can be to an absolute force. Kings can't show weakness, because others will come and destroy him.
Make God bleed, faith will be lost, chaos will happen.
Now this system isn't as radical or inhumane as the church and the crown but it does have the flaws that nobody can fix. So I suggest you adapt.
One little rebellion against police, security is lost, thousands might die. It didn't get there because the police tried their best to stop the rebellion, I suggest you do some thinking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@L.Fenton That's not how it works, dummy.
Trans healthcare is as valid of a science field as gender study.
Science is the research based on observation and experiments, not make belief by authority officials.
Some science are infinitely more valid than others, trans healthcare is more of a hobby activism than a field of study.
It is not based on any real measurable results, that's the first. And because the entire field is bogus, it shouldn't be recognized.
You have a cold, they prescribe you some antibiotics, that's real science, the functioning of the drugs is observable within the human body. The mechanism of of the drugs can be seen.
A guy looks at your behavior and say you have gender dysphoria, a term his field made up is a make belief guess.
Go study real science and you'll see.
Some "science" are just not real science.
Go get a real education, an online degree of trans healthcare is not an education.
1
-
@L.Fenton What they did with trans healthcare is too low of a standard
If you think all scientific fields are equally valid, you're adorable.
They're not.
Go study real science, real scientists like me, who study physics, mechanics, chemistry and even doctors despise those make belief field.
Go study real science, little kid.
If your version of real science is trans healthcare, you're living a sad life.
Pretty much. People who spent their lives studying trans people might have gotten a better result studying armadillos. Uses the same method, look, guess and run make belief results, you can never be wrong in those kind of field because the margin of error and acceptable results is infinitely large.
Trans people are as valid as the people worshipping a leprechaun somewhere in Northern Europe.
Can you study them? Yes, is it a respectable scientific field? Absolutely not.
Look, kid, we accepted those field of study as a field not because of their credibility, but because they're useless fields that can gouge out the money of losers like you pursuing them. You had great fun wasting a lot of your own money, but this is the limit.
Are you going to go the Nobel Prize committee and say, hey, trans healthcare is just as respectable as the other 113 real medical achievement you have crowned in the past?
Are you for real?
Go study real science, kid. Go to any university and ask them to put trans healthcare on their cover page as one of their "equal" major and they will laugh you out of the office.
Good one. In case you hadn't noticed, about 60% of the global population doesn't recognize such a field as a real scientific field.
So oops, the American delusion is shattered.
Real medical science discovered the image of the chromosomes and then modeled the human DNA. What did trans healthcare did except ruin the image of the rainbow?
1
-
@L.Fenton Again, that's not how it works.
If a study is non conclusive, as in it's not applicable to an overwhelming pool of samples with acceptable margin of error, it's a useless study.
Had you studied real science, you would've known that.
There are orders within a scientific field, some journal of publication are respected, some are ignored.
Your stubbornness of validating something that everybody despises is just remarkably sad.
One scientific field doesn't equal to another, kid.
What you called real scientists in that joke of a field is called nut job in 60% of the global population.
Which is most of Asia, including the notable ones India, China, Russia, Southeast Asia, Middle East, excluding Thailand.
It's not transphobia, they can be crazy within their own mind, we sane people just don't accept it.
Your standards of science is just too low of a standard of science.
1
-
1
-
@L.Fenton Nope, that's still too little. Because it's non conclusive.
There's no evidence of natural creation validated via measurements to categorize them as a separate equally valid category of human form.
And no, those studies are not accepted, because again, non-conclusive.
And they are a joke, they're a joke right now considering how no reputable university in the world dare to claim they're the "leading expert in transgender care".
Come on homie, keep it real. That field is as valid as leprechaun worshipper studies, it can be a scientific field, it's just a useless and despised upon field.
There is a lot of crazy thing about transgender, the first thing is their intentions of self mutilation. Surely one can cut off their limb safely but that doesn't mean it's a "normal" behavior, it's crazy behavior.
The global community has to accept such categorization as a legitimate sub category of human form, such as male and female. And unfortunately for you losers, the global community does not.
American delusion doesn't represent the world one bit.
Like I said, 60% of the world, meaning 60% of the global scientific community, doesn't accept such categorization.
Keep it real, homie. Like I said, it's quite sad seeing struggling to disprove something so easily observable.
The global community doesn't accept it as a real field. They may say otherwise but their action is very conclusive about it
No award, no prestigious journals dedicated to it, barely any funding.
How sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The lawsuit is in Michigan but the system is used almost nationwide, little children.
Having overvotes in those township, doesn't matter where, is a flaw in the system. Or is it you think that just because it's not in Michigan, then overvotes are not overvotes?
The allegation is that you cheated votes by using a highly unsecured, built for cheating voting system, so it does affect the result of the entire state, kid.
Pakman, poor Youtuber, Patrick byrne, actual tech billionaire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fYbzCS0Dwo&t=18s
Learn some math
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@intrinsicallylast5246 If you want a civil war by ignoring and twisting the rules, go ahead. You'll eat yourself alive
There's the word "consent" in the Constitution itself regarding Presidential nominations, darling. Not "usually", always consent. "Shall" means affirmative.
Your interpretation is false and is not accepted in any ways, by anyone, in any time
The military will follow the judgment of the Court, and of course, they will not follow the appointment process interpretation that nobody accepted in the history of the country.
If you want to take make belief English to the military or anybody really, go ahead. The Pentagon is in Washington, and sadly lunatics aren't allowed in it.
It will be very amusing watching you dummies struggle, very amusing.
This country doesn't follow a simple majority, kid. It's The United States, States United together. Filling enough lunatics at on state doesn't change the nature of the country that has a Constitution when it's formed. So get back to crazy land in California and leave us sane people be. Otherwise, well there's nothing you can do otherwise.
Go study some real English, some math as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rzadigi That's another lie, pal. There are a lot more than surviving. For example, the introduction of internet and education allows for improvement in living condition, it has always been like that. And further relation with the Russian and the Chinese, for example student exchange shall allow for more improvement within such society. The reason the Chinese and the Russian will be way more effective than the West in developing these areas are because of their dictatorship allowing for maximum power and efficiency. For example, if Russian state owned company enter the area to exploit the mines, they will start building facilities to raise the standard of living to the workers in the area. Unlike Western companies, who are after profit, Russian and Chinese companies are after power, which includes maintaining good image and relationship within the people of such region. As long as the people there don't get political, the benefits of having those 2 governments behind you is enormous. Far more than the backing of the American government.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but in the real world nothing is "right", by living where you're living, you're actively taking away somebody else's chance of living there. You have to deal with such reality.
Your claim of whatever replacement solution you have is firmly rejected by the people living there. Try finding something better in life to do than seeking out imperfection in the human world, that's so easy.
1
-
@rzadigi @rzadigi Again, no community will ever dare get in the way of such operations. People are not united, pal. Most of them will run when they hear the guns, some other people shall try to fight and they'll be killed. Again, that mine officially belongs to the government.
You can't just declare ownership on a piece of industrial land like that without any kind of permission.
And you need to go learn some math and some real economics. Economics power and living conditions are not measured by the dollar.
The average people in Russia live in a far better condition than the average person in the United States. The reason is very simple, they're self sufficient, cheap gas, cheap food, cheap land.
A waitress earning 15 dollars an hour in the United States doesn't make 10 times the wealth of a waitress making 1.5 dollars an hour somewhere in Southeast Asia.
You have to go learn some math, maybe you're not aware of this but living conditions are not measured via dollars, they're measured via products availability.
A prime example of this is when America tries to sanction Russia. It collapses the Western economy instead while the Russians are doing fine.
They have far cheaper food and gasoline there.
Go learn some math, pal. You're stuck in a bubble of delusions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pretty much. Look, the Feds work on the will of the American People, you want them to stop printing money, just vote on politicians who will stop them, in the Senate and all. But you can't, because printing money benefits a considerable number of people and they won't stop. For example, everybody who is in the medicare and medicaid programs, mostly Americans. If you can't print money, government programs has to stop and American lives will be affected, that's a trap FDR set up nearly a century ago.
So you know, the dollar works for a considerable number of American people, it is the American Currency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Thunder103093 Sorry, dummy, this Kyle idiot debunked nothing.
Learn some math, kid.
Federal tax revenue went from 500 billions to 1 trillions during Reagan.
The percentage of GDP went down but the tax revenue went up.
If we had kept the same tax rate, people wouldn't work as much, same percentage but that percentage will be with a much smaller economy, you can't tax yourself to richness, man, learn some math.
Tax rate doesn't generate revenue. People creating wealth and you apply the tax rate to that wealth generates revenue.
You can tax people at 99%, they wouldn't work anymore, so that's a high percentage but the money will be approximately zero.
Not to mention it's also slavery.
1
-
@Thunder103093 It's funny how you always claim stuff without proof. When was there higher taxes and better economy?
Are your referring to the time where the tax code requires the top to pay 70%?
Which just show that you're very uninformed about the subject, that first page tax rate is followed by a few hundred pages of tax exemptions that makes nobody pays the 70% rate.
So, sorry, pal, harsh reality, dummy.
Economy at the time of Reagan boomed.
After 10 years, The GDP doubled and the tax revenue also doubled, which is good because when GDP increase, it has to increase the wealth in taxable people, aka, middle class to be able to increase tax revenue. If you increase GDP by increasing low paying jobs, then the tax revenue would not increase at all, because the newly added wealth can't be tax due to people earning those wealth are still considered poor.
Go back to school, dummy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pikapi6993 First of all, the country of Israel shouldn't exist at it's current location.
Because that's not their lands anymore, the British colonized Palestine and give away Palestine's land to the "Israel", you can't just do that in the modern world. I don't care if your ancestors lived there thousands of years ago, in the last few hundreds, they no longer do.
The current state of Israel is built on stolen land, that's a given, some of those stolen land are legal under international law and is recognized by the international community, that's the part where the British gave away to them. Another huge part is totally illegal under internation law, no country recognize their current occupation of Palestine as their land, especially Jerusalem.
So I don't know why you think the victims of an invaded country is more dangerous than the invaders.
Go learn some math.
Even if you want a Jewish State, you can't just commit barbaric activities, violate human rights, destroy other people home to build your state, that's insane. Go buy the land from somewhere else.
How would you like if the Jewish State just decide that they want to build their state at your home country and divide into pieces, discriminate against your countrymen?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theoafman9068 Sure, Buddy. You're getting your info from Hollywood movies, wake the hell up.
HIV in Russia is nowhere near large enough to affect the life expectancy at the large of a gap. Please go study some math.
Like I pointed out, Rural Russia means including those gigantic Republics up in the North, and the Eastern part, which are like twice the size of Rural France.
Developing that gigantic of an area at that extreme climate is 10 times harder than developing rural areas in France. Or America.
You playing game at easy mode and then you claim achievements, that's absurd.
You compare cities because that's where it's cutting edge, it's the future trend. If your logic is that your country is superior in every way, shouldn't your cities be superior too? The cities are where the playing fields are leveled. No tremendous geographical challenges, people from around the country poured into the cities. Compare the cities, that's the heart of civilization.
Like I said, stop playing the game in easy mode and then brag about it. Anyone can develop rural America or rural France, it's cake walk, but rural Russia, buddy, the area of Russia that lives under -30 Celsius all year round is larger than Germany and France combined. And yes, there are people there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mo8720 You make a few mistakes in that very short reply that only a very ignorant individual can make, but that's not surprising.
1. Just because you're nuclear super power doesn't mean you can't be provoked, especially by another nuclear superpower. Example: US being provoked by Cuba in combination with the Soviet in 1963, or just right before that when the Soviet was provoked by the US in combination with Turkey.
2. The most active and heinois form of fascism we have is of course Nazism, and the only place in the world that harbors active Nazi is Ukraine. You have the report from the New York Times about Ukrainian Nazis, you have the Nazis emblem on Ukraine military elite forces, you have a known Nazi being codified into Ukrainian Law as their national hero, you have their President literally applauding an actual WW2 Nazi, a Nazi which Poland is asking to be extradited, of course Canada parliament joined in so maybe the second most Nazified place on Earth is Canada.
3. The only Imperialist country with an massive obession of invading and dominating people and territories whom it literally has no relation to or jurisdiction upon is the United States. In the last 20 years, the examples are invasion of Afghanistan, invasion of Iraq, regime change operation in Lybia, regime change operation in Syria, current supplying of arms in a genocide in Gaza. Of course this is accompanied by 800 military bases around the world, all of them on foreign soil , including a few illegal military bases on the soil of countries that directly declare that the bases are illegal such as Iraq and Syria.
I know you Americans are dumb but this getting sad.
1
-
@mo8720 It's good thing you've admitted your shortcomings. That's a start, besides of English, you'll also need extensive training on mathematics, physics, history, geography, logical thinking, you probably need training in more subjects than that but those are for starter. You know, all those fundamental knowledge required to be an average human being that you severely lacked.
Acceptance is good, now go improve yourself, buddy.
1
-
@OldLizard
Let me explain this one more time to you. Doesn't matter what your language is if your intelligence is sub-par. Get over yourself.
1. Personal experience that you have doesn't reflect at all the big picture of the region. There's a word for it, it's called ignorance, it doesn't matter what you have experienced, because you haven't experienecd what other people have experienced. We have proof, we have photos, we have witnesses. Are we clear on that? Just because you haven't been killed doesn't mean that no one is ever killed on Earth. Shocking logic, isn't it?
Like I said, January 1st every year in Ukraine is Bandera day, codified into law.
2. Gaza is not a separate country, it is a part of Palesinian territory, recognized by about 160 countries aka 90% of global poulation, out of 193 UN members through their voting of Gaza ceasefire where they identify it as a part of Palestine. The people aren't Gazans, they're Palestinians. And because they're Palestinians, the people there are entitled to sovereignty and self determination over the entirety of Palestinian territory. Which like I said, is recently recognized by 30% of global population as under illegal occupation.
You're not allowed to invade, occupy, steal other people land and then giving a small piece back claiming it's alright as if you're not committing crimes against humanity. Again, shocking logic, isn't it?
There's no propaganda here, pal. These are all verified facts. Flat earthers like you might not know this but there is a thing called the UN, where countries send their delegates to vote on International Issues. And how they vote express the position of the country. Is this going too fast for you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@a5cent That's like saying what Osama Bin Laden does has nothing to do with Al Qaeda.
America is the undisputed leader of NATO, or in fact NATO is a front for American foreign policy, or one among many front. Please, go study some math. You're saying the action of a single crime boss, most significant crime boss doesn't reflect the nature of the criminal organization. Where did you go to school?
1. The issua of Serbia, or Yugoslavia, you're totally wrong, it is not widely supported by many countries, US and it's lackey is not many countries. If you actually look at a map, literally over 70% of global population still today doesn't recognize Kosovo as a country, meaning that the reason itself for that NATO bombing is not supported widely. You need to go study the definition of "widely", that bombing is wildy unpopular.
2. Afghanistan, like I said, UN never approved that, the attack of 9/11 is not comitted by Afghanistan government, terrorist organization ain't part of government. And UN security council did not approve. Do you understand this basic logic?
3. You're still mistaken about Iraq, the US is still in Iraq today, though not as much they used to be, but they're there illegally of course because the Iraq government has asked them to leave and they don't leave.
Literally your knowledge of these matters is severely flawed. Please go brush up on them. A fundamental fact is that all of US military excapade of crimes against humanity in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Ukraine. None of them is widely supported on global scale, they are widely opposed on the global scale. Are we clear on basic math?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jackdaniels3573
You never studied Physics, Tesla is mentioned in school, just because you're stupid doesn't mean he is not mentioned.
Tesla is a scientist, he is not on the level of Edison, who actually brought scientific changes into application to the world.
Multiple inventors in history are never mentioned, just like Tesla, because their products are more business to business and not consumer oriented.
Tesla did not invent alternating current, he invented the means of transporting the current, the inventor of the current, that's Faraday, and the AC dynamo, which generate the current was invented by Hippolyte Pixii
Those people did not get mention in school, so I suggest you stop being desperate, kid.
1
-
@jackdaniels3573 Again, kid.
Same argument, if you claim that Edison is a thief, Tesla is also a thief who ripped off ideas from Faraday and Maxwell.
Edison work is improving designs and science discovery so that it can be implemented into daily life.
Tesla work is also improving.
Tesla remote control is obsolete nowadays. Only the principles of Tesla remote control is anything of value.
And as such, the principle behind Edison phonograph is valuable today.
Your argument is getting weaker and weaker, pal.
Phonograph stood for methods of record and replaying sounds, that is entirely different, even though not any less necessary than remote control.
Phonograph is very much ahead of it's time, the application of it is abundant and still being used today, the principles behind the phonograph is being used today in sound recording, which is everywhere.
Edison put his invention into gadgets, that's much more than what Tesla did.
Study real science, pal, you have been destroyed.
1
-
@jackdaniels3573 Oh, kid, too delusional you can't recognize the truth.
Greatest genius who ever lived? You desecrated Tesla's memories by spreading such lies.
People like Tesla is there spreded out through history. Their work make the life today possible, all started thousands and thousands of years ago from the first scientists who thought of ways to use bronze instead of stone, to Faraday, Maxwell, and then Tesla, and then afterwards, countless others.
Don't be so ignorant, you poor soul.
Your argument have no grounds, it has no credit.
Search up the SI unit table, countless names are there, each of those name contributed as much as Tesla. Your lies are just despicable. You desecrated Tesla's memory by spreading these absurd lies.
Have some shame.
1
-
1
-
@jackdaniels3573 Again, pal, that nonsensical theory doesn't work. Because by that logic, that everything that other people invented after Tesla was due to Tesla, than everything Tesla had invented was due to people before Tesla, which also includes Edison.
Don't be a fanboy.
Edison was a thief? He stole what? His motivation was greed? Yet he didn't go into gun manufacturing? The price on arsenal and military development was way much more than any of Edison invention. Excluding the light bulb.
Multiple things wouldn't have been possible without Edison. How to record sound, how to record images, how to light up your house.
Tesla didn't invent the internet, he describe some sort of similarity, however, such similarities are only ideas, not practical solutions. Tesla ideas were nothing, the Internet was invented by other people who studied computer science, not Physics, so the connection between Tesla and the internet is quite stupid.
Assuming that in the future, we can invent engines that travels faster than light, you would give credit to the Star Trek writers who proposed an idea?
Because by that horrible logic of yours, the earliest inventors of airplanes are the Chinese, with their myth of flying horses and more. Just vague"ideas".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@victorpradha9946 That's what you think, that's not how it works, pal. Because woman gets a vote all the time for people who will operate the military which is predominantly male by a gigantic margin. Keep it real, kid.
It's not your own body anymore, there's a different human being living inside. Your body involuntarily raised a life inside itself, You have forfeited your right, at least in an overwhelming majority of the case you did. Whatever right you think you have comes with a condition that you can not harm that baby.
The most important right is the right to live.
ED pills or vasectomy has nothing to do with harming a growing baby, women can get a tubal ligation anytime they want. They just can't hurt a human baby with a distinct DNA strand, that's not allowed.
Study real science, study real law, kid. Your make belief argument hold absolutely no value in the real world. Legally it's laughable, scientifically it's just wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sausyyt Buddy, what you know is propaganda or just plain false history. Get a grip, nobody in the world recognizes that version of the history
Because yes, Kievan Rus is the first state, and yes, the ruler of Kievan Rus eventually created what turned into Russia. Which means that the people of Kievan Rus and the people of Russia are the same people, ruled by the same "royal line" and "royal family". Speak roughly the same language, because otherwise why would the ruling family of Kievan Rus created an entirely new language for their new kingdom?
So congrats, you just admitted that you are Russians. Because Russians is the name used to called the successor of Kievan Rus.
And Communist Regime is not Russia, Russia existed long before communism and it will exist long after communism is gone. Get over it, whatever your grandpa experienced is nothing compared to 1000 year history of that region.
Congrats, buddy, join the motherland and stop betraying your own history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thehedgy3647 Nice try, pal. Neste is the biggest Finland company. Calculate the profit, pal.
Revenue of Nokia might be big, but because it's Nokia, the profit margin is no where near.
It matters because somehow the best education in the world is relying solely on technology developed by countries that are "inferior" in education.
Does that make sense?
You don't have any innovation. And because you're small, your government works well. The technology we gave you and the needs of the Russians for you, plus the xenophobic attitude you have to immigrants, those are the reasons where you little socialist paradise can come true. You're living parasitically
You're not superior in education, if you're that superior, you wouldn't have had to live parasitically.
Face the truth, pal. It's kind of weird where your education is the best but nothing good ever comes out of the country?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thehedgy3647 Oh, poor pal. Why is it harder if the people there are so superior in education?
Nice joke, pal.
There isn't even any big Finnish Entrepreneur, so stop with the nonsense of you having the best education in the world.
Because you have one of the most average outcome in economics terms in the world.
And of course, your educational system are so good that you produces zero notable academic leaders ever since 1945.
Your most famous person, is Linus Torvalds, but of course, that person also neglect Finland superior educational system and went to America.
By common sense, if the Finland educational system is the best, it has to produce the best students, going on to be the best leaders, the best academics, and then those people would create the best companies.
So if your educational system produces zero outcome, why do you think that you're the best? It makes people happy?
What kind of bubble you're living in to think that life is full off "sugar, spice and everything nice"?
Why is it your superior educational system produces highly average human beings? Shocking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cat grips It had gone up, but that's natural selection. If it's not for those exceptional people who went through hardship to achieve excellence and develop the technology which your country uses to live, for example, Neste, then your country would be much worse.
People with weak immune system gets killed by common cold, people with weak mental health, even though they're unfortunate, that is life.
Like I pointed out, life is not easy, is the point of education not to get the children suicidal or is the point of education to produce a better generation than the ones before to advance human life?
Like I pointed out, your superior education produces nothing.
1
-
1
-
@thehedgy3647 Taken from my SAT scores and my alma mater, MIT, I'm pretty sure I'm among the top.
But keep living in your bubble.
Your biggest company Neste, lives off American oil refining technology and Russian oil sources, it's pretty parasitic to me.
Pal, if you have no argument, I suggest you stop trolling.
You're the superior education that produces absolutely nothing.
Bravo.
And even worse, you took out United Nations, a dummy organization that also like Finland, does absolutely nothing.
Way to go pal,
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ihcterra4625 Yeah, and that's never going to work, dummy. At least it can never work in the long term, mathematically it's impossible to do so.
When you stop selling out the oil, prices will go up again and you'll be paying back even more than what you've originally paid.
If it takes them 3 months to buy back 1 million barells in direct cash. To buy back all the ones they've sold out will take nearly a decade.
So a decade with a massive dent in oil reserves. Brilliant move.
Keep it real, little kid. The decision to buy at a low price wasn't even made by this administration, but in the future, it will has to be bought back with far, far higher prices.
Like how when Bush sold the reserves to counter his war, eventually it has to be bought back in the future with far greater sum. This reserve wasn't supposed to be touched.
Go learn some math, kid. That make belief nonsense to create infinity from nothing doesn't work one bit.
1
-
1
-
@ihcterra4625 If it's that easy, dummy, OPEC wouldn't have existed.
There's no where on Earth that can supply oil like the OPEC countries.
They are remaining profitable right now, the higher the price, the more profitable they become, because the number of oil given to them by mother nature is constant. All of their wells are giving them increasing profit everyday, dummy.
And like I said, doing that "trickling" it back shall takes about 10-12 years, I don't think you get the point of the reserves, it should be always full.
Go learn some math, to build the reserves back to it's full capacity, it will always takes more money than what you can gain by selling it originally, because oil always, always keep getting more expensive, except in the case of another pandemic but that's very, very unlikely.
Go learn some math, and you'll see, infinite money can not be generated by juggling around finite things.
1
-
@ihcterra4625 You use the reserves in the necessary occasion, pal.
It's called direct war, not to lower prices of consumers gasoline.
Keep it real, homie. Poor Brandon was bribing the people with the oil they already own for other purposes.
And it's not even his administration oil, the oil that even the Obama administration refuse to replenish, was replenished by one person, not Biden by the way.
So show some respect, pal.
Overall, it's always net losses in the total. Go learn some math, and you'll realize how economics works, you can't create profit from nothing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maxcovfefe You think so? Go ahead, try to commit some medical crime, so obvious to the eye, then it's not going to be considered a medical act, but rather a crime, pal. For example, you kill your physician during a clinic exam. The history of your visits is definitely not protected by any confidentiality agreement.
Medical confidentiality only applies when they regard it as a medical act. If a doctor secretly , illegally smuggle you heroin and claim it as medical procedure, it's not protected by anything.
And you can cross state lines to do so, I'm sure the other states would happily provide funding for a stranger and all.
If you barbarians want to kill a kid, you can even smuggle them overseas. We can only stop so much, but we're not going to give up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What an adorable guy.
These tech, these knowledge is out there, pal, once it becomes dire for a nation to develop these tech by themselves, they will be able to do it. The cost will just be very high, which won't really be a problem considering Russia has all the necessary domestic tools to do it and a nearly generous source of income via oil and gas.
Don't delude yourself into believing the "peaceful" world order is the only world order. No, that "peaceful" thing, globalization only exist if certain parties allow it to exist. Now one major player is not having it. Just because certain companies dominate the global market doesn't mean that company is the only company who can deliver the result, they're the only ones who can deliver that result at that price, in war times, price becomes fluid.
What are you going to do once Russia steal all of your intellectual property? Sanction them? Again? That's adorable.
They've been stockpiling parts for military vehicles for months, they'll survive this, the private companies ain't really a concern for Russia economy.
America on the other hand seems a little bit desperate with their inflation situation.
And Boris Johnson just got humiliated in Saudi Arabia when the crown prince sent a lackey to greet him at the airport, very disrespectful.
1
-
@markofsaltburn Kid, these "techs" can already be re-created inside laboratories environment. If you think the Kremlin doesn't have it's own research and development department to work on such necessary projects, for example the unstoppable missiles that are years ahead of the Americans, you're a childish guy.
Entrepreneurs create new techs, unfortunately most of the tech in the world in created in the US and then replicated elsewhere. So Russia doesn't need to create anything, it can just rip you guys off like China.
Don't be childish, pal. There are people in Russia who are capable, they have certain national pride, the same applies to the Chinese and to the India. They're not prostitution who will coward under your money, pal. Get back to reality.
US invented the tech for the world, other countries happy to steal it. Other countries usually don't steal it because it causes too much, but if necessary, they can.
Wake up, pal, you've been fed too much propaganda.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markofsaltburn The Chinese has been stealing from you blatantly for the last 25 years. Don't see any negative side over there, their country has been doing nothing but going up.
Stop living in a delusion, pal. Like I pointed out, not all people are such prostitution who will sacrifice their national pride for a quick buck. It's a difference in culture, other countries beside America are not taught to be a bunch of whores selling themselves for profit. Shocking, isn't it?
Everything you claim about the value of the West, it's not shared by like 2/3 of the world population, we have a different set of values, you need to deal with it. As long as the "dictator" can create a stable functional environment, people will happily stays obedient because they can live their life happily with their family in their homeland, they will not sacrifice that for an illusion imposed on them by foreigners. You Imperialist needs to learn that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnkillinger453 The memorial is built the community, which is the previous administration, for the public, due to public request. Use your brain. Seperation of the state and the church is really complex matter that you're intentionally misinterpreting.
It's not that the church has no place in any state asset, 70% of the people are Christian, ao it's a natural thing for the government assets to be influenced by "the church", but the separation here is as in the church can't dictate the state's decision. Not unable to influence, just not to dictate. Because the inauguration of a President is performed by a Christian, the oath is written to God. The memorials of soldiers are shaped as crosses. Want to argue, learn some actual facts
You're just pretending that you know this, but you don't, it's just disturbing.
1
-
1
-
@johnnypenso9574 Okay, here's another idiot. You're misunderstood the income of students from Asian countries and American students which have Asian roots. 30% higher in domestic students income doesn't prove a thing, moron. If the average is 50 000 than the Asians would be 65000, learn some actual math. It's not adequate to pay Harvard tuitions. You're just ignoring facts, kid. Can you prove that they're discriminating against Asian?
How do you know that there isn't an equality of opportunity, you're just basing on the equality of outcome. Which is totally ridiculous. For example, I'm smarter than you and you can't be the same as me. Doesn't mean that you're discriminated against, it means that you're inadequate, kid.
If you can't prove something, and you have no actual information about it, don't type anymore nonsense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exactly, buddy. The West lost the edge because they made a stupid mistake, and now they're paying the price for it. The West sold their soul to corruption practices without knowing it and this is the price. So again, it's your fault, or your parent's fault, obviously. And no, not all products need replacement much earlier, the products that were produced earlier are of the exact quality, sometimes much better. The Japanese cars are being made now without a doubt far surpass what the Americans car manufacturer were able to deliver. You need so study some math. And new products that never even existed in the past are now here, they're more sophisticated, sometimes they're harder to maintain in perpetuity, it's called second laws of thermodynamics, study, hombre.
And yes, the small of elite Indians running those companies are not representative of the entire Indian society now, but it is a trend, an inevitable trend that those people are moving upwards, they have mastered enough science and technology that their catching up and being competitive is unstoppable. India can't become number 1 quickly, but they'll be a very strong number 3, possibly number 2, depending on how dumb the US society gets. And that's more than enough. Now you can deal with that, homie, or you can continue to live in an echo chamber by pretending that nothing is wrong with your society. Either way, it's not going to change much because it's probably too late, the consequences made by dumb decisions in the 1990s are here, and there's no magical solution to fix it. Save yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ZachDotsey No, those 9,980,000 people did get a voice, they had a voice in whether the states electoral college can vote for the candidates or not.
See, pal, you're living in a state, that state is a part of a United of States.
If 49.9% people in the country vote for one candidate but the other candidate won, they also did not have a voice, because doesn't matter the 49.9% result, their candidate wasn't chosen.
It's the amount of balance here. You're not voting for a leader, you're voting for your state support of a leader.
Electoral college is the balance between mob ruling, which is what will happen if general vote is applied, and overly distributed power, if you take each state support for a leader as one vote (50 votes in total, one for each states).
The 270 mark is there to ensure that there can be no President that relies only on simple majority, it has to be a majority of electoral votes.
The electoral votes also ensure the right of states with small population.
Wyoming people have rights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cliffmays442 Yeah, it's you wishing they would wake up, using your delusional ideas to oppress other people's idea.
You understand the civil war in the wrongest way possible. It's not between people who want to enslave other people and what not.
The freedom of slavery shall cripple the South economy, boosting prices on every kind of product, mainly agriculture, and the lives of the people there shall be affected despite the poor don't own any slaves.
The poor do buy food that are grown by slaves.
It's called math, study them. The pure negligence of Lincoln in the process of removing slavery is one of the holes people never mentioned.
He tried to demolish slavery in an instant, no transition time, no consequences.
Because people who own slaves just play by the rules, the rules which allow for slavery were there, so they used slavery as an asset for business, eliminating slavery means breaking the rules that had already been there, and it shall affect people massively, both the poor and the rich. Don't try to lie.
The people who never wore crutches won't know the importance of crutches. The south has slavery, the North doesn't depends on it so they don't know how important it is.
Learn some math.
And it's your assumption that this is pro-rich economy. Pal, the rich is the embodiment of working class become successful, I'm very sorry that the people who know they can work and get up the ladder doesn't share your contempt for hard-work and determination.
The voting process is there to keep radical divisive ideas from dominating the country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, people who don't understand logic, her argument is saying that there is a possibility, therefore all of it is happening right now. If don't understand what that means, I suggest going back to school, Oh, and she's also comparing privilege of herself, 1/535 of the Legislative Branch, to the President of The United State, 1/1 of the Executive Branch, it's called mathematics.
1
-
@rice-and-despairagus How about a simpler explanation? You're just an addict. You taking drugs don't just affect you, in Floyd case, it affects everybody around him. He act in an uncontrolled manner, he got involved with crimes.
Mr.Floyd should be rotting in jail for what he did previously in his life. So you know. Somehow there's never a case where the police kill a really innocent individual, huh?
Keep it real, homie. Floyd might not have deserved to die but he's not a hero, he's a career criminal. He's a career criminal that is also a victim, but again, career criminal. Had he not get killed, he is considered society scum.
So just because he got killed, he went from scum to angel?
Keep it real, homie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tyler Mod Really, you think Hilton, Kardashians are the symbol of rich people?
How stupid are you, kid?
You're going to ignore countless lawyers, doctors, surgeons engineers, self made millionaires and billionaires?
Nice try, kid, get back to reality and then you'll see that Kardashians and the Hilton's aren't the symbol of rich people.
Rich means living comfortable, don't blame the system just because you're stupid.
Oh and the Kardashians, their wealth originally comes from their father, he did very well in school, top lawyer, and some of the Kardashians are models, that's their labour, in your eyes it might be worthless but in countless people who pays them, it's not.
And the Hiltons got their wealth from their hotels, the guy who built those hotels did very good in school. Just ask all those competitors.
Kid, you're no where near reality.
Answer the simplest question. Who oppress you? How do they oppress you?
Or is it you're stupid and pathetic so you think that there must be something that oppress you?
That's just like Anti-semitism. You're stupid and useless but Jews are to blame.
.
Stop this now.
1
-
Tyler Mod What it takes to be Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, countless others well known successful people who were born into poverty or middle class.
Your argument is detached from reality.
George Soros, Larry Ellison, you can do a quick search and get a re-check on reality.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/billionaires-who-came-from-nothing-2013-12%3famp
Really, our economy is largely managed by government, which industry is that?
Fantasy?
Your logic course in college didn't teach you that if your logic is based on the fantasy inside your head, it's stupid to apply it to the real world.
The morons with your kind of thinking are the ones who are useless, dumb but think that they're smart, and highly arrogant, detached from reality, poor sjws who can't handle reality.
Just like anti-semitism.
You're stupid and useless but Jews are to blame.
Stop this now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@matthewbaumann630 Pakistan goes to the Arabs because they're an overwhelming majority. Do you get that? It wasn't given to the Arabs, it was partitioned to be in Arab State, and in this case, they didn't expel anybody who's living their before, it's the people who had already lived there asked for a partition.
In the case of Israel, it's the people from other places came to expell the naturalized owners.
The Indians aren't forced to leave, they leave voluntarily because they don't want to live in a region where they're considered the foreigners. If any of the Pakistanian government forcefully deport Indians during the time of partition, it's just as illegal as the Israelis actions.
Jews have lived there for thousands of years but they're the extreme minority. Do you get that? If a referendum is held in 1917, that place is definitively a Muslim nation.
The nonsense of colonizers or government can decide what to do with the citizens and the place is soundly rejected by the international community, pal.
It's not universal declaration of government's right. It's the universal declaration of human rights. The rights to a group of people of self determination is one of those unalienable rights.
British did not own the land, they were the colonizers, the oppressors. Ottoman Empire might cease to exist in 1917, but the people of the Ottoman Empire is still there, and it's the voice of the people who lives there that metters, not the British.
1
-
@matthewbaumann630 Pal, you're rooting for this insane, inhumane, barbaric point of view when the colonizers can do whatever they want, they can dictate their will on the population there and the population must follow no matter what. That's not how the modern world works.
The people who lives there at that time, which quite obviously consist of an overwhelming majority of Muslims are the rightful owner of the land. Government, rulers, colonizers come and go, but the people there remains. After 400 years, the overwhelming majority of Muslims there are the naturalized owner. You can't argue against a basic human right, pal. The right of self determination is one of the unalienable rights that gives human humanity.
Please, catch up with the civilized time. Your 3rd century mentality just doesn't measure up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To you, pal,he's clear, precise to people who don't now anything, and that's just pitiful. Cohen, Papadopoulos, Stone, Flynn, he edited their cases out of context, every one of them. It's called lying, if you had gone to school they would've taught you that.
1
-
1
-
@MP4_mafia It does make them less human. When you committed a crime attacking people, you surrendered your right to live, because you have violated other people's right to live. You're no longer an innocent person.
I don't know what your collective right is but we countless individuals do not accept such insanity. The society is collective of individuals, so if your "collective rights" conflict with "individual rights", well, then your collective rights do not exist at all. Because first and foremost, the individual right of everybody has to be respected.
Why don't you take that meaningless theory to a judge and get thrown out test it's credibility?
More guns do not reduce violence, more lives and more criminals will increase violence, that's statistics, bigger pool of people, more crime. by the nonsensical argument you're making. We should just kill all criminal, that will ensure "no criminal", it's a meaningless argument.
The gun is a right, the right to own a weapon to defend yourself from other people and from the government.
If we want to surrender our rights, we will do it ourselves, like we did with the automatic rifles. But it's not up to you to decide at all, kid.
And there's no such thing as an "assault rifle", AR in AR-15 stands for Armalite, the company that design the gun. And it shoot one bullet at a time, just like a handgun. It just do it more efficiently because a handgun is easily disarmed, so not an ideal self defense weapon.
Get down from your high horse of hypocrisy.
Those criminals got shot because they were attacking somebody. Unfortunate, but life is not perfect. Society does not protect attackers from getting killed if the people they attack act in self defense.
1
-
@MP4_mafia That's his opinion, it's not a fact. This gun culture is what the people accept, you don't like it, try to amend it, you don't have the votes.
The people here voted to accept that culture, just like they voted to accept liberty and democracy. Your feelings do not triumph over anybody else's feelings.
Hey, if you feel sad that people enacting their right to self defense, you're welcome to vote against it. You'll be taken as a clown but it's your right of liberty, just like it's our right to own a firearm.
We the people rank the lives of attackers like Mr Rosenbaum below the right of innocent civilians to own a weapon to defend himself from people like Mr Rosenbaum.
If you don't like it, we don't actually care, we have the votes, that's democracy. It sucks for you but great for us. Just like even though how we dislike the State law system privilege that allows California to destroy itself and nobody can intervene, despite it dragging the country down with it, we have to accept it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, it means that he had already won the China fight, kid, the deal itself is only on China's term, China earns nothing except having to complied with multiple conditions relating to buying more US products and intellectual property.
To be exact, what do you morons want? He imply tariffs, you say it's pointless, he removes tariffs temporarily and get a deal that benefits the US, because it basically returns the market to the point before the trade war but China has to comply with conditions and you're criticizing him for what? The deal is not good enough?
Pathetic, go back to school, kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In 2016, he predicted that Trump won the popular vote. That couldn't be more wrong.
The same was with Bush and Gore.
The method he use makes no sense, because that 13 keys he make doesn't account for the severity of each cases, he developed it in 1980s, and till now, there has only been 10 elections. Most of it was a fluke, because out of those 10, he was wrong 2 times, and the other 8 times he went with the polls.
The dumbest thing is to say that social unrest lies with the riots, and not with the people afraid of the riots.
The subjective judgment of true or false is as cliche as it can get.
If there's no methodology to the result you make, it's insane to think that the results are anything but a fluke.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fixed that for you They have it because Disney allows it, soon, they won't, and then, Netflix will fail, after Disney, it would be Fox, NBC, CW, Lionsgate, an app is not that hard to design, you just need an idea, and when the app's quality sticks with the content on the app, the one who possessed the most content will be leading.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rr7firefly Then what kind of device are you using to post your comment, pal? The typical laptop or computer is more expensive than a smartphone. I guarantee you is that you are contributing into such "pollution" more than you realize. You can't escape it, pal. if anything, with all the companies around you, Facebook is one of the least damaging company to the world environment.
The world is far bigger than the little bubble you call America, Facebook is crucial to countless businesses overseas.
Countless things that you're currently doing plays no role in "making a better world", stop the hypocrisy, pal. Facebook is like any other company trying to make money, you can't criticize them for doing so because you're actively participating in a lot of other unnecessary stuff.
The whole purpose of companies are to indulge the customers wishes for entertainment and joyful experience, every company does that.
People want a chair, it has to be a pretty chair, even if the cost and the use of resources is higher. People want shoes? It has to be pretty shoes, even if they're less durable and has to be replaced more often. Human society is indulging, keep it real, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, the CNN guy didn't read the report, or he's playing dumb to brushing up Cortez's ass. Anybody who actually read and still claim to be "supporting" of it is plain lying, and it's incredibly pathetic that none of you morons could actually post something to prove your nonsensical point. Do it, give out a few examples, try to talk to the point, moron. I'll gladly dedicate my time educating a bunch of unemployed idiots. Bring it on, if you have the balls to put your dignity where your mouths are. Give out some points on how that stupid plan of medicare for all could be paid for. Except for that one study that did not say "medicare for all will save us 2 trillions". It pointed out due to the new "sufficiency" created through drug distribution by the government, 2 trillions will be saved. Unfortunately, the report didn't mention on what will differs from the current situation. If medicare for all is applied, in order to achieve that fantasy saving of 2 trillions, all American citizens must comply to that unrealistic program, destroying the free market, insurance companies, and probably the entire federal budget credibility, because to achieve that 32 trillion dollars mark over 10 years, the tax rate would have to be doubled immediately and then still have to be raised one more time, want to know why, read the report. And again, inequality when the top 1% will again, pay for more free stuff for idiots. Here's a simple logic, if the poor can't do anything to save their own asses, do you expect them to do anything when all of their living is paid for by somebody else? There, fact check, that, you have all the time you need. Give out some replies, idiot. If you can't, I suggest that you stop believing in this delusional "Latinas" or whatever the term she uses to attract unemployed people, and get a job.
1
-
1
-
Carlos Ve
So your only proof is tweets and your feelings. Give me the source about wages and tariffs consequences, because last time, the tariffs immediately led to a newly negotiated deal for American Farmers, the soybean growers, or is it you don't read, too? Obama led the country from recession, to nearly bankrupt, the debt did doubled in his horrifying 8 years. Go back to school, kid.
And for your little brain, some tips on people who watch mainstream media, the majority of them don't know a thing, therefore they bet on news companies to deliver them knowledge, and most of the time, they lost. For example, you pal. You're the prime example of idiots turning to fake news or average news organizations and didn't learn anything, because if you knew how to learn things, you wouldn't have get involved with media corporate numbers. 73% of people want medicare for all? Those kinds of poll also said that Hillary Clinton would have wonthe 2016 elections with 92% of the electoral votes. Too confusing? Those are fake stats. Again, go back to school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brianlittrell797 Really? So somehow an immigrant like Omar with barely any knowledge of anything can become a congresswoman yet there aren't enough chances?
Use your brain. They're not getting chances because they're not opening to obtaining those chance, work 3 or 2 jobs for many years? If those jobs pays badly then change it, or is it they're not qualified then get a degree.
The government made the most out of social benefits so that a person can do nothing and can still live, don't pay taxes, food stamps, hospitals actually taking care of you first before charging you for it.
You think you know poverty, kid? Go to China, Vietnam, Thailand, that's poverty, you are just useless.
There isn't much chance, well, there won't be any chance for you if you keep being you. Try to be better.
1
-
1
-
Yeah, this kind of image is hurting the Conservatives, not to insult her or anything, but the stylist of the show should think of getting a new style for Tomi Lahren, there's just not enough seriousness looking at her, and with some people who bare prejudiced, which are a lot, considering the number of stupid lefties, this will not convince them. Maybe change the hair style, less beauty pageant, more political commentator. Slow down the tone like she's saying serious stuff, because the things she said are serious, but it sounds more like an 8 year old girl at a rodeo than anything else. Not an insult, but an advice.
1
-
1
-
@fallencobra5197 First off, Russia did not take out the entire power grid of Ukraine, otherwise, you wouldn't be getting the propaganda news from the comedian headquarters. They took out some, not all, it's an extreme generosity.
Originally he didn't send in 200k troops, and even now, he hasn't launched any notable offense with the further mobilized troops.
He can mobilized 10 million men, doesn't matter if he doesn't use them for "invasion".
Keep it real, hombre. It's not an invasion, because there's nothing worthy of value in the cesspool of a "country" except for the ethnically Russian people which has been living in the Eastern region long, long before the existence of his "Ukraine" made up country and thus, those regions are of those Ethnic Russian people, and thus are rightfully Russia.
This made up country existed for less than 40 years, those territories have been of Russian control for nearly 1000 years.
Go learn some math and spare us your ignorance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KillerT-Bone Because it would killed more Russians than necessary and kill countless Ukrainians civilians for very little gains.
You need to go learn some history, some geography and some math. You're severely lacking in all sides.
There is nothing worth of value in Ukraine that Russia hasn't taken yet except for Odessa, but that place has no value until there's peace and economic trade. So right now Russia established a sea blockade there.
But the rest of the place is literally worthless, Kiev is a worthless piece of land, no oil, no facility, no resources.
Why would Russia kill tens of thousands of people conquering something totally worthless?
Now Russia is only using 15% of their power, 5% is a bit too low. But 15% of their troops are still dozens of thousands of people.
So I'm so sorry that the Russian leaders don't share your contempt for human lives.
They are holding back, kid. They're calling up reserves to be in reserves currently stationed at their own borders. They haven't even deployed the reserves into the battlefield. That is holding back.
Now of course Russia can just kill nearly a million civilians like the American pigs did in Iraq. But unfortunately, they don't also share the Americans contempt for human lives.
They can easily win in exchange for maybe a million civilian casualties and dozens of thousands of Russian soldiers. But they're too kind for that.
You see, pal. Not everybody is like the American pigs, they don't go around killing people and civilians just because of their ego.
1
-
@KillerT-Bone You've been living in this Hollywood fantasy for far too long, when you treat human lives as if they're figures.
Wake up, kid.
And no, Russia is not the second most powerful military in the world, it is the most powerful military in the world, based on production capacity and resources independence, it is the most powerful military in the world.
You must still be living in a fantasy where military performance is measured by dollars being spent. But that's not real life, wake up, hombre.
Simple test, you go volunteer for Ukraine , and you'll probably dead if you dare to go to the front or not, if Ukraine is "winning", pretty horrible odds, but like a degenerative gamblers, you're bad at math.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This interview really showcases Fridman ignorance of how governing system works.
America is the most successful capitalistic system in history. Unfortunately, most of those success are achievements in the past. Like the Roman Empire was one of the most successful Empire in history, at the end of the Roman Empire, it's not so great.
And is he going to continue to ignore that actual Nazi standing ovation in Canada? And no, it's not a small part of the government, the hell are you talking about, they are the Azov batallian, the most elite part of the Ukranian military and the part responsible for waging that civil war in 2014. And yes, they can list the Nazis on the negotiating table, it includes most or all of the policy makers in 2014 that waged a civil war on the Donbas region by criminalizing their history, tradition and language overnight.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jugjivan Jivan Grewal Okay, idiot, how can't they not under attack if their position is being intruded? What do you think the caravan's gonna do? Knock on the door? What are they gonna do next? Leave?
Use your brain
That act is from 1878, and it can be easily changed. The way people act according to the law can be based on how we interpretate law, maybe you would like to read Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, he did made up an entire new kind of power. But we allowed it anyway because it was the reasonable interpretation.
The same applies here, military can do whatever the President deems necessary, they just need to interpret the action into their own terms.
The 1878 act doesn't mention anything about defending the border, that's their roles, not the police. First thing if you want to study law, kid. Learn to think first.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RazomDoPeremohy You lived in only one part of Ukraine pal. You probably have left that part since 2014 because you're not being sieged right now.
If your friends and family are in Kyiv, they're not really the people Russia wants to annexed, Russia wants to integrated the people in the South and the East, which already includes nearly a million refugee from the Donbass, who goes to Russia.
Shocking choice of destination for people who considered Russia as "hostile".
So don't pretend as if you're there.
Nobody shell "civilians", kid, targeting civilians achieved nothing. Does Russia target the military blending in with the civilians? Yes, blame the Ukrainian military who are holding civilians hostages.
Where do you think the Ukrainian Military hide? There's nowhere to hide except inside civilian infrastructure.
Had your friend been a little bit smarter and left the city before the invasion or left accordingly through the Russian controlled route, he might have survived.
He made a stupid move and paid the consequences. You run into a warzone, you get killed, it's your fault.
Civilians in Mariupol are now being able to get out, not because of Azov, of course, they went through Russian checkpoint and shockingly, they're not being killed.
1
-
1
-
@pezilord Oh, they could, pal. There's absolutely nothing stopping them from carpet bombing that city with suppressive fire from artillery.
They're not afraid of civilians casualty in order to get a considerable number of terrorists.
The civilians inside these cities are just too much, the Ukrainian army are holding too much of the civilians hostages, that's why Russia is showing leniency.
The fact that these idiots can still use the phone or Internet in general is extreme leniency.
They can easily hit Ukraine energy infrastructure via cruise missile, but they don't, because they don't want to affect civilians everywhere in the countries, they just want to focus on the cities where the Ukrainian nazis are hiding.
There's nothing stopping them from flattening those cities in a heartbeat, those cute portable defensive weapons aren't really a match with mass bombing from Russian air force. Get your head out of your ass, pal.
Putin wants to limit the civilians casualties as much as possible, he's not going to kill random civilians, he will accept some civilian damage if it means destroying certain Ukrainian military in the process. Where do you think the Ukrainian Army hide? There's no where for them to hide except in civilian buildings. Doesn't matter if it's a hospital or a "kindergarten", weapons can still be deployed there no matter what.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Michael Johnson Yeah, nice try, pal. Next time get your source from somewhere that isn't Reddit.
Here, use your little brain to deduct this, if the people are paying for the money they're given and they still get money, where does the money come from?
To people who don't pay taxes, how are they paying for the money they're given?
Estimated 2.5 trillion is needed, 10% V.A.T so you're saying that last year, America spent 25 trillions on expenditures? While the country's GDP is 19 trillions.
While there are 126 millions households, with the average of 50000 dollars per household, not to mention that the number is that high due to massive numbers at the top. The entire income of households in the country is only 6 trillions.
And if your plan is to remove any social benefits to pay for this, people would have to use the same money you've given them to pay for the benefits which they have lost, it's called minus sum game, because you can't leave people to die when they spent away the money that you took from their healthcare.
Yeah, REDDIT MATH.
Go back to school, kid.
1
-
Michael Johnson And public schools, public roads, social security, police, fire department, those are the roles that the people give to the state, public properties that are agreed upon by the majority of the public.
Socialism is part where you apply things that nobody agreed upon onto their lives, like that fake math of yours, if the government takes people money to spend on something that doesn't serve their best interest, it's socialism. And that happens all the time, but we allow it because those are small sums or they're necessary and they can't be force upon.
But Obamacare, that is socialism, it causes harm and nobody wants it because they're paying not for them, clear, kid?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tbz1551 It's also based on nothing except his own interpretation of Presidential Power. We're at war pal, not officially, but we're always at war with the forces of evil, and it has nothing to do with Bush's definition of it. This is the actual force of evil. A Force that wants to break our order and laws, the situation is different but the principal beneath is the same. Clear? If you're still confused, leave a reply, I'll explain it. And a higher understanding of the law, laws are what people inferred from principles, and they have flaws, so at times in need, we'll act on the principle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, that's not how it works, treason means direct action against, within the range of control. President firing missiles into civilians for no reason, yes, that's treason, but with holding aid here, for what reason?
Hunter Biden is corrupt and it's clear, if you buy that zero experienced, millions of dollars nonsense, just think a bit.
Trump has a reason of doing so, and that reason is solid enough to justify the action. One part is because the military aid here is not essential to anybody survival. If he had withheld sending aids to American Troops fighting overseas than maybe, that's an arguable question, because does he have a solid reason?
Your definition of treason is childish. Abraham Lincoln ordered generals to let the soldiers of Indiana to go back home and vote, that puts us at risk, is that treason?
Lincoln has its reason, the lives of those soldiers will be determined by the election, so should they have the right to go back and vote? Of course, that is when the soldiers are not fighting, but it still put us at "potential risk" of attack.
It's a complicated issues but revolves around 1 principle, does he have a solid reason. Hunter Biden is corrupt and in this case, it's more than enough.
Dershowitz argument is about the specific "articles" and to destroy the future of them ever being used again, not about the principle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelkulman7095 No, hombre. All lands in the world are stolen, because at the beginning of human civilization, there is so much killing and conquering that it's impossible to find the accurate owner of any piece of land. So there needs to have a way to recognize land ownership that doesn't involve the "original owner". But an agreed upon method, and the entire world chose the method of most recent significant ruler since 1945.
The 1945 landmark is used because that's when the world comes together to form the UN and stop this whole cycle of conquering and stealing. This applies to all people around the world, not just the Jews. Unfortunately somehow only the Jews are allowed to break this norm and get away with it, so yes, you're right. Rules do differ with them, because they're the the only outright villains here.
But again, I would ask you not refer those Zionists as Jewish. They're not Jews, they're fake Jews.
It doesn't matter who is the native individual there at all. You got conquered and kicked out, you can't just use violence and force to kill your way back in, especially not after 1945. Are we clear on that, savage individual?
The Muslims don't feel that those lands are theirs. Those lands are rightfully theirs, because that area is under the Ottoman Empire for hundreds of years, the ownership of that land is transferred to them, the Muslims who lives there, like with any other people on this Earth. Denying the Muslims those lands is an outright form of hypocrisy, because they have been living there far longer than the age of America the country.
What? Is being treated equally too insulting to you? There is a magical time decided upon by the entire world, 200 years is more than enough. So why don't you stop considering yourself the center of the Earth and get back to real life.
The fact is that Israel, if it can exist at all in this modern world, by all logic must follow the same rules as everybody else, and they're not. So they will be forced to follow those rules now, and this time, there's nothing the American Imperialists can do.
Somehow the American pigs chose to back an unwinnable position from the first place. They back an extreme, overwhelming minority in the region to oppress the normally recognized owner of the land and in that process provoke a religion 6 times the American population.
This isn't 1947, this isn't 1967, times have changed, and you have to catch up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@THX..1138 It's more of a trivial parting gift. They can keep those planes, they just can't keep the nukes, that's proprietary technology.
And again, those ships build in Ukraine, paid for by the central Soviet Government.
There are things that are allowed to be kept, call it "for old-time sake". you can keep the statue, you can keep a ship, you can keep a plane. You can keep majority of the technology the Russian gave you because you're a member of the USSR, that's the Russian generosity, maybe.
But You're not going to keep a nuclear arsenal, that's the limit.
Keep it real and get back to reality, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@metalman4393 And exactly what country is that?
When was your borders infringed upon? In the last 40-50 years? Or when countries were still fighting over territories that they conquered and claim to be their own, which is not just a temporary Chinese characteristics, but also every other country on Earth, including Japan, France, UK, etc
Tiananmen Square happened 35 years ago, buddy, why don't you take an event from the 21st century? How about you do your homework properly?
Tibetan refugees are what's called criminals in China, they're criminals because they're asking for something totally unacceptable, violent governmental overthrow, which is called treason. Tibet has been part of China for far too long, longer than the existence of the USA itself, they have been granted autonomous rule from ancient times, and that's what they're given now. Secession means treason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Elon Musk is a flat out liar. Any of his supporters claiming to know math probably don't know that his plan to Mars is actually not based on any math.
Clue: if you took 2 years for one is single launch and another 2 years to come back, and he missed it, btw. You can't get enough results to do it in 10 years, maybe even 20 years.
Oh and that AI is dangerous? If an AI can do what it's not programmed to do, it's no longer a machine, it's the evolution next form. If that comes to reality, we'll have to deal with it. Hey, bit if you're scared, don't develop that technology, oh wait, he seemingly doesn't care. That's pure hypocritical.
1
-
1
-
@elftax Nice try, kid, can't make up lies, go learn some math.
Those expenses are called personal expense, the people voted against you knowing that he will make those expense, sorry, you got beaten.
And that call of investigation claim, it's all your assumption, read the transcript, Trump asked Ukraine to investigate corruption, just because Biden and his son are corrupted doesn't mean Trump is asking an investigation of them. Pathetic, go back to school,kid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justinthacker370 Define luxury, kid? What is luxury? Diner at restaurant? A phone? Clothing?
Majority of consumers payments are not for luxury products, so if you say that taxing only 10% on luxury products, aka things that most people don't have, then no way it can pay for that delusional UBI, kid.
Finland is not doing well with this, Finland is stealing from people to give it to other people, nobody works there because they don't have to. What's Finland ? It's a country with population of a city and tax as high as it can get. Use your brain, don't steal from people.
VAT is used at countries that has no freedom, they tax you, why don't you get a job?
You want money that's not yours? Check your moral standard, pal.
It's not your money, don't steal, have some shame.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@veryiran1567 No, pal, we can say anything about these countries if we can back-up our claim, it's called decency in argument. Try to learn it, Omar failed to back-up any of her statement, failing to provide any solid evidence for her comment, therefore that is anti-semitism, here, "Israel is a country which origin raises many question about it credibility".
There, I said it, it's not anti-semitism, because it has facts, evidence, solid ones to verify it. They just came there and took back the land, which is called invasion to countries around them, and that action should be condemn in the free world, but the base they're basing on to take tha land is also a thing worth to be notice, how the people were persecuted and then killed off in millions were the action of evil, so they should be compensated by the action of being able to use the same force to regain their status. There, that is an argument, that is an actual question, not anti-semitism.
Clear pal? Think a bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, moron. The idiots need to wake up. They're comparing military budget, the biggest military in the world, 700 billions, to a 3.3 trillions per year for a delusional healthcare plan. Math is the enemy, right? Wake up, people, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland do not have a population 1/10 of 300 millions, but their GDP combined is 1/5 of the US. It's immoral to give people's healthcare that others pay for. Any morons who want an actual debate could reply in the reply section, I'll destroy you and then welcome you back to average world, because you're below average. People who can't afford healthcare are not working, and "working" here is not working in 7 eleven, no it's actual work, intellectual work. Hard work as in competitive work.
1
-
1
-
@hipsonsogbo That's another falsity. Gold can be moved easily already because in every single country, they have their own gold exchange and precious metal shop.
A store of value is supposed to be only used in the worst case scenario, so the "speed of transaction" is totally an unnecessary feature. Is that the best argument you can come up with?
Your baseless assumptions of bitcoin being a better system that will be integrated into society is laughable, because you have no argument to back it.
Bitcoin will never be used as the primary means of exchange, because it violates one of the first principle of money.
It's distribution doesn't fairly represent the value of labor among people. A bunch of useless people like you will be given infinite monetary power overnight for doing absolutely nothing, just because you hog a bunch of coin early. That's not going to happen, that's the human nature.
The only way a crypto currency can be accepted as a means of transaction is when a government adopts it, and the government only adopts it if it's in their favor, or their people's favors. As in it brings them back the same or more benefits than fiat. The US will have gone bankrupted 20 years ago if they can't print more money, why? Because that's the only thing the US can do when they promise endless social security programs to undeserving people. People believe in US military superiority and they believe the dollar will never fall. Because if America loses it's superiority and the dollar is rejected, there will be chaos around the globe that the value of currency is the least of your concern. You think printing money is bad? You don't understand society, kid. Printing money is the only thing keeping America alive. America is taking the global economy hostage with it's military intervention tactics, it's politic interferences tactics, all to keep the dollar important, so that they can print as many treasury bonds as they want because they know other countries need the dollar.
Legacy finance doesn't rob people, the people had voted on for legacy finance, and they will support it for as long as they could because to an overwhelming majority of them, the undeserving ones, without the ability to create infinite free money in the fiat system, there's no way they can keep the social security trap alive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hipsonsogbo No, pal. In El Salvador they adopted it because it's El Salvador, it's a country that nobody really cares for and they elected a frat boy as President.
GDP is measurements of production power, not anything else, and El Salvador uses the dollars.
They accept Bitcoin but nobody in that country uses Bitcoin to price things, they're too poor for it. Anybody who uses Bitcoin for payment in the last year just lost 70% of their values. You can't use it as payment if their prices fluctuate by a few percent everyday.
So go learn some math, darling. El Salvador is the example of how you shouldn't be implementing cryptocurrency into the legal system.
It is unfairly distributed Because dummies like you probably hog a decent amount of them for doing nothing. And we don't have any intention of giving you great monetary power.
If you have to take El Salvador as an example, you're either really dumb or really desperate.
El Salvador is a transition to nothing, it's an example of a pipe dream gone wrong. The job of the government is to help the people, to bring education, healthcare systems, trade regulations. Accepting a new means of transaction does absolutely nothing for their country, the people are still poor and low level workers so go learn some math, pal.
That country is encouraging their people to pour the money they needed into speculative assets, there's nothing good about it. The ones who purchased Bitcoin in the last year lost most of their money, and they need every cent of it. It's not a rich country, it's El Salvador, not Monaco.
So go learn some math, pal. You don't understand the fundamentals of economics and human behavior, that's why you think the world will gladly give you infinite monetary power by adopting a means of transaction that creates absolutely nothing.
If there is a legal crypto means of transaction, it won't be your shitcoin.
If you don't like Dogecoin, how about shib coin? Limited amount, totally useless.
1
-
1
-
@hipsonsogbo Again, the net gain of the total investors are zero
Just like the recently collapsed Luna tokens, FTT tokens, just because something is traded by a bunch of dummies do not mean they're in any way "valuable".
You're treating it as a commodity, and in commodity, there's a thing called bubble.
Your argument applies with Tulip flowers as well, because prices going up therefore you're always correct.
Do you see how sad that argument is?
Your argument of bitcoin forever was said when it's at 30 thousands, and then 50 thousands, and then it collapsed to 17 thousands. Who's the ignorant one when you're regurgitating arguments that you don't understand one bit?
Even the biggest Bitcoin believers Michael Saylor knows that Bitcoin is not a means of transaction. At best, it's a store of value, it's crypto property. unfortunately for him and for you, most people right now don't have enough money to store their values, they're racking up on debt. Bitcoin right now is a commodity, it's an unregulated securities, in the last year, it's down 64%, so pretty sure currently it's a horrible way to store your value. High volaitlity means it's gambling.
Go study some math, darling. You're a crippling gambling addict, nothing good can come of that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-uu8fh4zd8w Again, kid, you are ignoring the point, stop being a fanboy.
We're not talking about this case, this is a lucky case, the point is that what happens if this happened in the highway, malfunction in changing lanes, malfunction in estimation of car space, moron
It assist you in driving but what if the assist is wrong and an accident happens?
You're taking your example of minor cases where you can feel the tension. If the autopilot auto steer you. There is no tension, you can't stop it from steering because the point is auto steering.
What's with the auto maintaining speed, what happens if it increases speed in a distance that there isn't a safe space and you can't hit the brakes fast enough?
You're ignoring logic to be a fanboy. Stop that, kid.
This is a lucky case, but what happens if this case happens again in an unlucky way?
1
-
@user-uu8fh4zd8w Again, you're ignoring math, it's impossible for anybody to react on an immediate malfunction, learn some math, kid. Don't be a fanboy.
100 km/h means 28 metres per second, the highway is only 25 metres wide, so a failure in auto pilot will crash you before you ever react.
Don't be moron, if you can't argue against logic, at least stay quiet, don't be desperate.
Nobody can monitor something they can not see, coming at that speed. That's why the smallest impact on racing can be deadly, moving at such speed.
Don't be a fanboy.
1
-
@user-uu8fh4zd8w So, Mr fanboy kid can't deal with math?
Go back to school, kid, learn to drive.
You can't counter stuff that you don't control moron.
A driver can not do anything if that auto pilot program suddenly shift the steering wheel and hit something, moving too fast, it's called science.
You don't know how to drive, this is just pathetic.
And you also can't foresee if the car will accelerate suddenly and hit something, because the distance is too small and the velocity is too high.
Learn to drive, kid. You can't handle math, you can't handle logic, your nonsense of "always pay attention". It's pure stupidity.
You can't pay attention to stuff you have no control over, whether it will malfunction and crash into the perfectly positioned car next to me.
There's no danger in sight, except for the car you're sitting on, kid. Stupid. Go back to school, you troll, learn to drive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Retrostarscream You posted from the source and then you lie about what it means. You're trolling, right?
Hey, pal, anybody can be related to the investigation and any of them could say anything on matters that doesn't relate to the investigation. You can't charge somebody of lying about how they eat lunch. IDIOT!
Pal, the report is his opinion plus his finding, you never studied law, haven't you? What would he say? I did this job incompetently. At any report, they need to state what they have done, and if Mueller didn't add the adjectives before the word, he's just being normal, but Mueller isn't normal, he's heavily biased. And if that is just his opinion then it doesn't matter, that opinion came with another opinion that he can't declare guilty, or he won't declare not guilty and it's the same. Study.
The OLC opinion DOESN'T MATTER. That opinion regards to action being taken, not findings or what you can conclude, you're a troll, right?
Ken Starr did it with Clinton, stop taking a fake excuse.
And the last thing idiot, about opinion in court of law, yeah it does matter, they can use their own opinions to lie and in the court of law a lawyer like me will just debunked your lies.
1
-
1
-
@Retrostarscream No, a prosecutor kob is first to find crime, made conclusion and then indict, you can't indict somebody without making the conclusion whether they're guilty or not, so yeah, your argument crumbled on it self. It's a solid proof that Mueller is heavily biased, not giving conclusion, that's not finishing his job on purpose, holding press conference to not say anything new except raising the concern of Congress capability of removing Presidents from office, but taking no question at all to clarify. Yeah that is biased, or if you want to have absolute proof, yeah, it's life, pal, you can never have that.
But if you won't settle for the bias case which can be made without any difficulty, I'll go for the incompetent in not doing his job. Not giving out conclusions? 40 officers to raid a man and his deaf wife? Hiring people who had records of personal dislike for the subject of investigation.
Anything else? Pal, if you're going to call those proof opinions, then fine, but remember my "opinions" at least make sense, as in how you can't poke holes in it, but your opinions are lies that I had destroyed.
Go somewhere else, small time troll.
1
-
@Retrostarscream And that's obstructive how? If The President of The United States deemed that Mueller violated the laws due to conflict on interest, it's his prerogative to fire Mueller, you want to check the law?
McGhan didn't feel comfortable doing so, he decide to resign, so The President's subordinate felt uncomfortable carrying out a completely legal order, so your case is?
Pal, The President could order for Mueller to be fired, check the law. So it's obstruction because what? The President told somebody to lie about things that had nothing to do with the investigation? He can tell Mcghan to fire anybody and then tell him to say that the President ordered McGhan to get some chicken, no legal violation there, the special counsel can't charge people who lie about the things that the Special Counsel have nothing to do with. Study, pal, you're just trolling.
1
-
@Retrostarscream Pal, you raise a question, that's your question, the law itself doesn't require the President to explain to you for no reason.
The President can order anybody to do anything as long as it is under his power. He can ask a White House intern to call Attorney General and ask him to fire Mueller, just because he feels like it. The power of the vote from the people allows him to do so.
And the conflict of interests are clear, Trump pointed them out multiple times. Unnecessary raids that feature multiple agents, leaking content to biased fake news organizations, using tactics to prosecute things that had nothing to do with any matter of the investigation, oh and hiring a team full of investigators not belong to a third party.
Clear enough? You're just ignoring proof, want to study pal?
And your little thesis at the end, totally wrong, it's his right. Go ahead, Mueller performed an incompetent job, Trump wants him to be fired, it's called common sense, you want to check the law again? Pal, idiot.
Like I said, if you were trolling, go back to school, small time troll.
1
-
1
-
@Retrostarscream Yes, he did asked McGahn to change account, but for political reason. If you're new to politics, you should know that any action taken directly by The President will be under scrutiny of the fake news media. He has every right to ask that, he also have the right to ask for McGhan cooperation, nobody can hold him for doing something that isn't limited anywhere. Mueller's investigation isn't into how The President fire a counsel, it's about Russian Collusion and crimes relating to it.
But check the law, because The President has every right to fire Mueller, then that action itself is not even remotely related to the investigation. He asked McGhan to lie to the public, to tell the press a different story, a story that wouldn't make much a difference because anybody could pointed out that Muller was doing a heavily biased job, I just did, it's just that the story of somebody else firing Mueller would look better than The President firing Mueller. Study, pal, it's not a crime.
He asked how can he fire Mueller, they told him that it is his right to ask somebody to do so.
I don't think it's lawful, I know that it is lawful. Department of Justice is under the Executive Branch, and The President, as the head of the executive Branch has the right to fire anybody he feels appropriate. If you don't agree with the action that he's taking, you can vote against him, for now other voted against you and that's it. It is lawful, study, pal.
1
-
@Retrostarscream Again, pal, false assumption right there.
You're linking the fact that what had happened behind the stage to what Sean Spicer tell reporters. First off, reporters don't have any roles here. Spicer could've told them that the earth is flat and nothing will come to him. So there that is done for for your thesis, at least do some research.
Next, Rosenstein said to officials that he won't participate in putting out a false story, you assume this as a proof for what The President had asked him to do, which can't be proven. Following a reasonable interpretation of a story isn't putting out a false story, but yet those 2 are really close to each other. You can't prove what it is, because the "story" here is about subjective arguments between the President and Rosenstein, which can interpret differently if there were false communication between the two. You can't prove anything. And even if the President had directed Rosenstein to tell a fake story, then it can't be charged as obstruction because it doesn't relate to any crime and it's not lying to the investigator, as in how he's talking to the Press and not Mueller. It's the President authority to fire Comey, if he did through an intern or secretary then it would still be legal. You can't charge people of obstruction if they're lying about what they're given the right to do, and what they did isn't even related to the subject of the investigation or toward the investigators. Your case has crumbled even more here.
So yeah, pal, law isn't just about quoting stuff that you have no idea what they are. Study!
1
-
@Retrostarscream Great, that's your thesis? So? Like I said before, just because McGhan feels doesn't mean that it is. Department of Justice is branch of the Executive, and as the head of the Executive, The President outrank McGhan, probably by quite a lot. So, anything?
Your boss feel that there is enough evidence, you do not, you resign, it's your's boss duty and right to act in what he believes. Clear, pal?
Donald Trump has every right to fire Comey, you can't argue that just because a subordinate disagree then it means obstruction, no you just simply can't. Study some law, pal.
1
-
@Retrostarscream Because there isn't enough outright, pal. You know what it's called, intelligent. Those people at the high end are biased but not stupid. You see, they steer you into their narrative, there are proof of conflict of interest, I just pointed them out, but it's not enough to absolutely confirm something that can only be confirmed by mind-reading.
So yeah, like I said, Donald Trump has the right to fire them, and if you feel that there aren't enough reasons, vote, I'll vote against you and countless other will, as they had done before. Clear? Study some law pal.
1
-
@Retrostarscream Great, so your thesis is what on the interference?
A few ads on social media cause the Clinton to lost 70 electoral votes, it's like 10 states with the population of nearly 20 million voters, is that what you're saying?
Yeah, that's rich, pal. Go study some actual law and politics.
I voted for him because he's the right choice, and his results proved that I was right, GDP growth, record low unemployment, jobs which Obama lost have returned, China is going down, Technology thief are being arrested.
So what's your point, Clinton lost because she lack a few social media post? She got the entire news network that have the viewership of 6 million every night, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, why she still lost?
How about the left wing media interference in our election? Does those Russian ad run false information? Maybe, but then aren't voters the one who decide the information to be true or not? Who supervise whether the main stream media provide true information, nobody, they've been providing false information for 2 years. So yeah, pal, study, you're just being desperate.
1
-
@Retrostarscream You do realize that information is the truth being hidden, right? By saying that you won't accept the truth just because somebody else discover it for you then you're just lying to yourself? Which grade are you in?
And he also concluded in the report that there isn't any collusion, you're citing the reason which lead to the investigation, you're trolling or what? The Steele dossier is mostly unverified, read it pal, one of the claim in that piece being rejected by the Mueller report, so you're just what?
Listen pal, I don't whether you're dumb, stubborn, or dumb and stubborn, you've been destroyed, every single thing you claim crumbled down as I knocked them down with facts and logic, and now you're just typing the most ridiculous assumption that I also knocked down easily. If you've lost, I suggest staying silent and not being desperate about it.
1
-
@Retrostarscream Perhaps you'd live better learning something, pal. Only the idiots have trust when the agencies show clear incompetent and corruption. The people keep them in check, that's how we stay free, idiot.
Go ahead, move to a country like China, they have trust, remember how there was a protest where the government used ammo on civilians, tanks and stuff, but because they got "trust", nobody ever knows about it. Pathetic, pal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@liberality Countless stuff in the world that you're using is not verifiable, countless stuff are theories, predictions, models that are agreed upon via an acceptable standard. Clear on that?
Simple example, growing a specific crystal or a new material takes 2 months.
When you send that to a publisher, what publisher has the resources to grow a specific crystal or material with that kind of standard for 2 months to verify the results?
And that's just one paper, if 20 leading universities send 20 different kinds of materials and results, and you only have one machine, are you going to wait 40 months to verify all of them before deciding which to publish?
Scientific credibility is a huge, huge factor. There was no incentive for this specific scientist to falsify results, those papers are the least important ones of his career.
1
-
1
-
@liberality That's a shock, I thought Springer only have esteemed publications on really esteemed fields. Apparently Springers also dip their fingers into the likes of you who apparently don't do any real science.
Little buddy, the most significant fraud in history happened at the most prestigious journal. It's the Schon scandal and the papers published in Nature and Science magazines.
Schon reported breakthrough experimental results on semiconductor that cannot be replicated by anybody in the world but there's no way of noticing that his results were falsified until he slipped up and used the same data in one paper in another paper.
So basically the only reason they caught Schon cheating was because he made a rookie mistakes while cheating.
The reason there's no way of telling whether Schon faked his data or not, is because no experiments anywhere are identical to another.
That's the nature of the real world, everything follows a normal distribution, there are errors in the experimental process, no matter how small can lead to an unsuccessful experiment.
That's what happens when you do real science, especially in really delicate field such as semiconductor physics or quantum physics.
Why don't you go learn some math?
Whatever your deal with Springer was, it must belong to the least esteemed field, because you seemingly don't know the basic that every serious scientist knows.
The ability to fully understand and verify something is getting harder and harder everyday till the point that's not feasible to fully understand everything. Research are getting more and more specialized that unless you're doing the exact same sub field, you won't be able to understand it fully.
That makes the authentication process as difficult as ever and as meaningless as ever. Because it's impossible to fully authenticate something.
That's real science, it's hard and it's challenging and it's prone to mistakes.
It's unlike your nonsense where it's sugar and spice and everything nice.
Publications make mistakes all the time, because they're humans, their stamp of authority is getting more and more meaningless by the day because they don't have the resources to replicate all the cutting edge research around the world on huge scale.
Like I pointed out, an experimental result of a new kind of crystal that took 2 months to grow, 20 of them are submitted at the same time for 20 different kind of crystal. Are you going to take 40 months to grow all 20 different kind to verify all of them? Not to mention the error in growing them in which the know how is not widely known?
And you can't get more machine because one machine is insanely expensive and most researching centers only have one of them?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@changster15 I don't know if you had ever heard of synonyms, pal.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". That's pretty clear what it meant.
The 5th amendment is about due process in a court of law. Has nothing to do with this "substantive" nonsense, those are procedure guarantee, they don't guarantee any substance, not that a specific one you can name.
Fourteenth amendment is again, equal protection, no person can be stripped of life, liberty, property without due process.
It has nothing to do with a vague general right. Study real law, pal, you're confusing textualist and strict constructionist, which accounts for a very small percent of the textualist.
All of the Supreme Court Justices are textualists, however some of them are originalists, which means they can only interpret the text on how it was understood at the time it was passed.
If it's not in the Constitution, it's not in the Constitution, you can't just vaguely interpreted texts based on however you want it.
Substantive Due Process is a textualist interpretation, it is based on the text that contains the word "due process", however, it is a main "Living Constitution" interpretation, which accounts a considerable percentage of textualists. And this interpretation, like Scalia said, doesn't make any sense.
You keep inventing protections barely based on any evidence, any logical reasoning, but varies from people to people by opinion, that's not law, that's tyranny.
You don't get substantive due process when you read both the fifth and the fourteenth amendment. You FEEL as if there is such a thing when you read the fifth and the fourteenth, which is great but society doesn't work based on your feelings.
You need to have a sane legal argument based on words, logics, precedent, not make belief.
1
-
@changster15 Congratulations, you are among hundreds of thousands of lawyers in the country. Not really something to brad about, but congrats anyway.
Maybe apply some logical thinking behind it and you'll be a great figure one day.
All of your reasoning made no sense. Those cases, based on logic are wrongfully decided cases. It violated the principle of precedence before them. And furthermore all of those cases failed to backed up their decision with any sane argument.
Quoting the nearest case, ignoring how that case ignored precedence before it is insanely dumb. I don't know why anybody would do that intentionally.
All those cases are wrongfully decided, based on no logical reasoning, this new Supreme Court, I hope will overrule most of this, any states who wants to criminalize sodomy, can.
That's Democracy. Study this type of law, pal, otherwise you'll be a joke practicing law for the next 20-30 years, if you are specializing in Constitutional Law.
The Living Constitution approach, it is dead. Scalia made sure of that. And his "disciple" on the Supreme Court now won't let you get away with such nonsensical reasoning anymore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@everythingnice914 Horrible services and banking apparently, since the Americans didn't even bother to count you in as a potential sponsor.
The super league is going to happen. You think a few screaming unemployed people can stop that? The clubs are heavily in debt, all of the clubs are. Once the club stop being profitable, the billionaire owners won't keep pouring in money. Except maybe Man City but that's not profit from football, it's profit from oil money.
So unless you're saying that oil money is the only way football can continue, I suggest you rethink.
The player wages and the intervention of oil money, plus pandemic has made playing and franchising football the old way impossible. You pay less than what a player can get from oil money, the player leaves. You pay equally the oil money salary then you're broke, because there's no way of getting that money back.
No ticket revenue means you have to increase TV viewership. And sadly, the old format doesn't attract enough viewers. It's not Perez or any billionaires deciding that. The "fans" decided that, by not watching enough game.
So why don't you blame yourself? Do you watch New Castle vs West Brom, maybe if you had watched those games, the Premier League would've gained more TV money, and the big clubs might not want to quit.
Blame yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davilakarlos Yeah, you didn't watched the whole footage, you took a glance at best, watching includes thinking, you can't called somebody out if all of your arguments are assumptions, anchors salaries are high, otherwise why would people want to be an anchor?
The "Dutchman" can not link the fact that most workers work for some kind of corporate to corporations paying people to follow them. Dutchman failed, as you failed to point out which part of Fox News is biased? Anything, go ahead, point it out, the "Dutchman" insult people for no reason and pretend to be righteous, it's just despicable, that's called watching, it includes thinking, try to think.
1
-
@emseek9822 You're mistaken. Pal, you can't quote part of the conversation and then claim that it's the entire conversation, it's called lying. Mr Dutchman his idiocy also accused Tucker of journalism misconduct, intentionally driving news to target "minorities", calling Tucker the "problem" to the country,
ALL OF THE ABOVE ALLEGATIONS ARE DUTCHMAN OPINIONS AND HIS OPINIONS ALONE, SUPPORTED BY NO FACTS INSTEAD OF HIS ASSUMPTION THAT TUCKER BEING A PART OF CATO INSTITUTE IS SOLID EVIDENCE, WHICH IT IS RIDICULOUS, BASELESS, TOTAL NONSENSE. IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO AND ARGUE WITH DIGNITY, AS IN HOW YOU QUOTE THE ENTIRE LINE, I SUGGEST STOP BEING A TROLL AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL., CLEAR? IT'S EASY TO SEE IF YOU TRY TO THINK.
1
-
@emseek9822 You're mistaken. Pal, you can't quote part of the conversation and then claim that it's the entire conversation, it's called lying. Mr Dutchman his idiocy also accused Tucker of journalism misconduct, intentionally driving news to target "minorities", calling Tucker the "problem" to the country,
ALL OF THE ABOVE ALLEGATIONS ARE DUTCHMAN OPINIONS AND HIS OPINIONS ALONE, SUPPORTED BY NOTHING EXCEPT OF HIS ASSUMPTION THAT TUCKER BEING A PART OF CATO INSTITUTE IS SOLID EVIDENCE, WHICH IT IS RIDICULOUS, BASELESS, TOTAL NONSENSE. HE CAN NOT POINT OUT FLAWS IN CATO'S PROGRAM, HE CAN'T POINT OUT MISTAKES IN THE INSTITUTE CHAIN OF REASONING OR RESULT, IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO AND ARGUE WITH DIGNITY, AS IN HOW YOU QUOTE THE ENTIRE LINE, I SUGGEST STOP BEING A TROLL AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL., CLEAR? IT'S EASY TO SEE IF YOU TRY TO THINK.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1