Comments by "RM Domainer" (@rmdomainer9042) on "The point of Russia's meat wave tactics" video.

  1.  @hyhhy  Very amusing that a frog-poster would bring in a "hurr durr cope" statement in a serious discussion. It is a statement that instantly shows that you come from a simple background and haven't moved on from it.
    14
  2. Many loaded statements there. OFC your alternative reading has nothing to do with reality. That capture of Bakhmut was the end of Wagner and lead to an armed rebellion. How many "victories" like that can Russia handle? Moscow has been blatantly incapable of capitalising on Bakhmut, unable to move beyond it for 7 months!
    4
  3.  @ajbcollectables  It relates to your flawed loaded statements that you bring forward as truths. Russia are not moving beyond Bakhmut. They have not even taken Klischiivka back.
    4
  4.  @ajbcollectables  ", all is rosey in the mercenary garden" Yeah fertilised from the bonemeal of 40-100K dead Russians.
    3
  5. Synkivka. 3 examples 3 days in a row. All caught on drone cams.
    2
  6. You are really gonna play the racist card over a nation that attacks another for the purpose of lebensraum?
    2
  7.  @ajbcollectables  Beyond? They have literally not moved their lines in 7 months. They have not even taken Klischiivka back, which is nothing but ruins of farmhouses at this point
    2
  8.  @ajbcollectables  ", it's wrong but I don't see how it's relevant. " How convenient. Wagner is an empty shell now. Russia would require 100 victories like Bakhmut to seize Ukraine. Defending against them is the best bang for the buck ever.
    2
  9. For a person with a normal IQ, there is no contradiction here. See if you can figure out why.
    2
  10.  @garethmartin6522  Here comes the bot 🤣Unpaid tankie or just poor paid poster?
    2
  11.  @RG001100  Gotta wonder to what extent the troll farms are literally using AI these days. Will surely improve their spelling ability.
    2
  12. "We've known from RUSI analysis" You will have to bring out an actual statement from RUSI in order to use it as a counter-argument. Take this opportunity to learn about flawed argumentation. Yes, we are seeing good Russian equipment destroyed at ANDRIIVKA. You were saying?
    2
  13. LOL. Did your botfarm owner tell you to use that word? As if you've ever opened a book on ww2.
    2
  14.  @KappaClauss  There was a request: find a stament of his and debunk if it you have the means
    2
  15. Funny how you have not a single relevant source to support your claims. Talk about waste of 0xygen.
    2
  16.  CZGrubbery  I am completely unironic when I say: I know!
    1
  17.  @chadhaire1711  Now who is lying. Synkivka attack on a video search gets you MANY results.
    1
  18.  @chadhaire1711  Already gave you the keywords, kermit.
    1
  19. Maybe they see it as a shortcut in the goulash market
    1
  20. No, what doesn't pass basic logic there is your statement from the poisoned well. The strawman at the ends does not gel well with a statement that is purportedly from logic either. You understand this but you are a bad faith participant.
    1
  21. Because its a war and rotation is needed. This is not complicated.
    1
  22. Even small waves are waves. We are seeing them piled up on top vintage MT-LBs now, and reports are starting to come in about walking attacks.
    1
  23.  @ajbcollectables  You seem to be unable to counter a statement. That statement was: Bakhmut was the end of Wagner and Prigozhin.
    1
  24.  @LutherusPXCs  "There was always meant to be a confrontation sooner or later" Factoid. Not relevant.
    1
  25. Lots of loaded statement fallacies there. First you have to prove your claim that Ukraine is losing the war. What we indeed are seeing is that Russia is not winning, kilometres from their starting blocks.
    1
  26. Indian intelligence Reserve? You would have to quote an actual statement from Anders in order to counter it. As it is now you are just strawmanning. OFC people do not get taught about the invalidity of fallacies in your neck of the woods.
    1
  27. What you believe is of interest to nobody. Probably not even your family.
    1
  28. " have lost 600,000 of their best me" I find it amusing that you could not prove that statement, even if you could save a family member's life by doing so.
    1
  29. Synkivka. 3 examples 3 days in a row. Google for it.
    1
  30. Yes. How much does that pay now, 1 cent?
    1
  31. Troll statement nothing else. Deal with the points made, not jingoism. Ofc you do not have the ability.
    1
  32. Synkivka. 3 attacks on 3 consecutive days.
    1
  33.  @chadhaire1711  One can not post links here, genius. I gave you enough data.
    1
  34.  @chadhaire1711  " posted on this thread" No you do not, and one does not post ON threads, African. One posts IN threads.
    1
  35.  @chadhaire1711  There are literally 5 posts in this thread. You claim there are 5 links here, Kermit. Not a plausible story.
    1
  36.  @KolyaUrtz  Try again.
    1
  37.  @chadhaire1711  Look at the other Kermit that managed to Google a video link. Now you, m0uthbreather.
    1
  38.  @KolyaUrtz  He defines it in the first seconds of the video. It matches the Synkivka attacks.
    1
  39. You sure as hell do not care about Ukraine. You just made a "concern troll" statement.
    1
  40.  @pimcramer2569  Well, any coalion they are part of will neuter that part of their agenda. MH17 is surely still remembered.
    1
  41.  @alexandersikosek8114  Just saying it does not make it true, vatnik.
    1
  42. No, we see a distinction and you bringing up that ad hominem seems to indicate that you are of bad faith. Also: you using the word "DS" as a noun indicates that your mentality is that of a child. It is not how adults converse.
    1
  43. It is what they pay you for.
    1
  44. Nice syntax there and 2 upvotes in 29 seconds. You are a paid poster.
    1
  45. So you literally sit in a callcenter environment in the thir-d world huh. You know that telling us about that would be way more interesting than your paid posts.
    1
  46. "similar, or bigger losses as Russia" . No that is a fallacious statement. You come from a position of bad faith so ofc you do not care.
    1
  47.  @KappaClauss  Your slav grammar shines through and "ban one" is not the expression you are looking for. Find a statement of his and debunk it if you have the means 😆
    1
  48.  @KappaClauss  Your slav grammar is still there
    1
  49. Just wait until the bots get orders to pile in. We will have 500 0xygenwasters shouting "lie", "zelensky is beggar", "this is propaganda". That will increase the view count too 😆
    1
  50. That is a 'murikan issue. Europe has no problem in understanding the Palestinian plight. I guess because we have less of a problem with evangelicals and 5th columns. Germany is another case due to guilt.
    1
  51. Literally is. What do you do for a living, emoji poster?
    1
  52. Those MT-LBs are hilarious, both in quality and appearance. It is like if the US army would have rode into Iraq on Willys jeeps.
    1