Comments by "RM Domainer" (@rmdomainer9042) on "Ukraine shoots down multiple Russian jets" video.

  1.  rusputinputin6595  Seems like you are confused about the definition of liberated vs occupied. Avdiivka? What weird map are you using? If that is what you call full forward, then you will seize Ukraine in 2050. 11km2 near Avdiivka seized in 7 months, within eyesight of the 2014 lines
    38
  2. A Ukrainian made T34  @MrZlocktar 
    23
  3.  duncansmith7562  "you'll understand the difference." LOL. You sound like Solovyov now. What are they gonna do, burn their bras?
    16
  4.  @PhilippensTube  I do not mind. Angry trolls increase user interactions, and thereby make quality content like Anders' content get more views.
    16
  5. The problem is that your own Telegram channels confirmed it, most notably Fighterbomber. Russia only started projectin about Ukrainian losses once those losses were confirmed. Classic Kremlin. They even claimed to have shot down F35 for a moment lol
    6
  6. Vatniks always spell lose wrong. You lost the battle for education. Off to the front with you.
    5
  7. "the Republics that voted to join them" LOL. So organic
    5
  8. The world that matters (educated and affluent) is Pro Ukrainian. The only comments that are pro Russian anywhere are either tankies or paid 2 post thirdies.
    4
  9. They start with biolabs conspiracy theory, end with flat earth 🤣
    3
  10. This is just a rant. We have Russian Telegram channels confirming it. At the same time the Russian MOD are claiming F16 losses. Are you gonna deny the landing craft getting obliterated 2 hours ago too?
    3
  11. It is like they knew the ship would be sunk tonight
    3
  12. No ship destroyed in Feodosia either I guess?
    3
  13. Except that many Russian milbloggers confirm it. Why don't you go to the front and look?
    3
  14.  @karsten11553  Haha. Top comment. Thank you
    3
  15. Paid 2 post. You are not even human.
    3
  16. Thank you for your input Patel.
    2
  17. Russian Telegram channels verify it, bot
    2
  18. He literally tells us several possible scenarios. Russian Telegram channels have confirmed it btw.
    2
  19. "dozens ot planes every mth" LOL. Not likely
    2
  20. 4 times and 4 upvotes by the same guy. Consider volunteering for Dumbabwe.
    2
  21. Great. You are referring to Russian Telegram. By your own choice of source, Russian Telegram has already confirmed these losses. You still have not had a single confirmed kill of HIMARs btw.
    2
  22. They have not learnt how to deal with HIMARS and Storm Shadow at all: They sunk the Novokerchassk with them tonight. It is Kyiv btw, not Kiev, you concern troll
    2
  23. Russian telegram channels have confirmed it
    2
  24. The crews are trained already. Just flying low level with radar off and launching an AMRAAM when targetting info is passed on from NATO AWACS is not difficult. Runways can be sweeped.
    2
  25. "Mr Anders" Spot the Indian paid poster
    2
  26. More like whining.
    2
  27. Confirmed by Russian Telegram channels like Fighterbomber. Sorry.
    2
  28.  @Princip666  A Russian channel that always tells the truth about Russian losses is evidence indeed.
    2
  29.  @lordcola-3324  Sorry for calling you a bot then :) Merry Christmas. Ukraine FTW
    2
  30. We are supposed to believe the Russian Telegram channels that tell us it happened.
    1
  31. Russian channels have already confirmed it. How do you shoot down a Patriot? It is on the ground already, vatnik
    1
  32. Idiots are the ones that can not make a solid claim, without using fallacies, with an example and a debunking. Off to the front vatnik
    1
  33. Bot
    1
  34. The greatest defeat was your mom succumbing to the ludicrous act that spawned you
    1
  35. If they sound complicated, maybe you are simple?
    1
  36. The same airfields that launch the SU24s that launch the Storm Shadows can also be used for F16s. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
    1
  37. Russian Telegram channels like Fighterbomber have confirmed it.
    1
  38. You are more of an enemy than the average muzz ie.
    1
  39. Confirmed by Russian Telegram channels, vatnik
    1
  40. The fact that they paid you to post that indicates that that is not the truth.
    1
  41.  @united2436  Let me guess, the fact that you have no argument means that you are paid 2 post and not the sharpest tool in the shed?
    1
  42.  @gdiwolverinemale4th  The level of flawed reasoning among Kremlin bots is off the wall. Russia has no path to a win, just like they had none in Afghanistan. Do you really think they are able to occupy and milk Ukraine like NziGermany did to Poland?
    1
  43. No, Russian telegram channels confirming it and Russian MOD claiming something are two different things.
    1
  44.  @tomk3732  Fighterbomber has already confirmed it. His reports have always been true. No, he has never claimed 100 Ukrainian aircraft downed. Russian MOD is a completely different thing. Look at their casus belli, a complete lie
    1
  45. You probably smell like cabbage soup. Russian Telegram channels confirm it. So how do you feel about the Novocherkassk singing tonight?
    1
  46.  @cathalmccionnaith8268  You forgot: how do you feel about the Novocherkassk sinking tonight? According to the Russian MOD it is only damaged, yet we see it sunk at the pier. How come?
    1
  47.  @cathalmccionnaith8268  Why should there be images if they got hit over Russian occupied territory? Russian Telegram channels have literally confirmed it. End of story. The rest of what you post are red herrings
    1
  48.  @cathalmccionnaith8268  It was on point. You ignored the question. I reminded you
    1
  49.  @cathalmccionnaith8268  Why should there be Ukrainian images if hit over occupied territory? The Russian Telegram channels are enough confrmation
    1
  50. Confirmed by Russian telegram channels, mr ludicrous bot name
    1
  51. As you very well know. Novokerchassk blub bluc
    1
  52. What, democracy? The west? If that is a problem to you, stop wearing our clothes, using our tech and our language.
    1
  53. Calling that a liberation would be the lie
    1
  54. Confirmed by Russian Telegram channels, vatnik. Ask your shift boss
    1
  55. Look, a thirdie
    1
  56. Seems like Russia are having a problem, seeing as they are 2 years into their 2 week invasion, yet stuck within sight of where they started.
    1
  57. Why don't you call yourself lyingsword?
    1
  58.  @flyingsword135  "hurr durr". So you have nothing. Noted.
    1
  59. why do bots always have some vaguely script generated usernames?
    1
  60. Oh, that is a new-fangled way of spelling losing wrong. Where did you school? A knocking shop?
    1
  61. Prove it, vatnik
    1
  62. You have no brothers in the west. Stay right there
    1
  63. Bot
    1
  64. You do not even believe they destroyed the Novokerchassk tonight
    1
  65. Why do you repeat that? Russian channels like fighterbomber have already confirmed it.
    1
  66. Russian telegram channels confirmed it
    1
  67. Classic bot. Spells losing wrong
    1
  68. Are you mathematically confused? Russia have taken 11km2 near Avdiivka in seven months.
    1
  69.  @garfildgrom  Is that a question with a broken syntax from a broken man? Yes I have looked at maps in the last 2 hours. You could not show 30% of land grab if you could save a family member's life by doing so.
    1
  70.  @garfildgrom  As a matter of fact, the only time Russia held 30% was in early 2022 when they were near Kyiv and Kharkov. NOW they are at way less.
    1
  71.  @garfildgrom  Love how you brought up math when you just showed that you have no command of it: I just curbstomped you, kid
    1
  72.  @garfildgrom  Got dyscalculia? I just broke you
    1
  73.  @garfildgrom  Add up the 30% vrmn. See the actual number you come up with. Avoid the English language until you command it. Off to the front with you.
    1
  74.  @garfildgrom  Dyscalculia and dyslexia and born this century. Unlucky. Frontschwein is your only option
    1
  75. Russian Telegram channels do too, Patel. Only defctate in the designated street now, ya hear
    1
  76. Trustworthy Russian sources have already confirmed it, bot. Check fighterbomber
    1
  77. Fair enough. I did not read your post properly.  @moth1488-o3o  Wonder if it was the same pilot that was named in media later, or if that was another one.
    1
  78. I am amazed that you spelled losing wrong. Bots fail in 90% of the cases.
    1
  79. Everybody cares. Especially the ones that paid you to post that
    1
  80. Nice grammar, vatnik
    1
  81. 6 posts and 6 upvotes in 1 hour from you. Basically the same idea. Bring out the exact quote, vatnik
    1
  82. Keep up, the debunking was debunked.
    1
  83. "the proves". Where did you learn English?
    1
  84. You also spelled viking wrong
    1
  85. It ends with you not getting paid 2 post anymore
    1
  86. Read up on attrition of machines. A functioning military needs 1/3 in repairs 1/3 in training and 1/3 in action. Now 200 days into their 2 week war, they are in trouble.
    1
  87. ​ @maszkalman3676  I live in the actual reality where somebody that writes like you can not attain gainful employment, nor have their opinion listened to. Where did you go to school?
    1
  88.  @maszkalman3676  " you would know no one beat russia" Don't conflate Russia with the Soviet Union, muppet. Afghanistan was the end of them .The rest is just an odd diatribe. Are you on the spectrum?
    1
  89. the datalink from another radar to the plane I'd say. The plane can be fed info from a NATO AWACS that is loaded straight into the missile. The plane does not need to have its radar on.
    1
  90. Probably due to being a bot. Ask for a fresh IP
    1