Comments by "" (@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684) on "The Refit of HMS Hood - But what if she had survived?" video.

  1. 6
  2. Do you think Adalbert Schneider (Bismarck's first gunnery officer) had his beady eye looking through his eyepiece with a crosshair lined up on Hood's magazine? A broadside salvo of 15 inch shells is analogous to the pellets in a shotgun scatter, but obviously on a MUCH larger scale. The CEP (circular error probability, or the radius of a circle that 50% of shells fired can be expected to land within) of Bismarck's main armament (38cm SK C/34) at the range involved in Denmark strait is approximately 330ft, so that in a perfectly aimed salvo by Bismarck's 8 guns incoming on Hood at a rough angle of 12-13 degrees, 4 shells could be expected to land within an ellipse (due to the shallow angle of the shells approach) 660ft wide and a couple of thousand feet long, that crossed 76% of Hood's length, but those 4 shells would be completely randomly distributed, so the luck aspect is that in that wide scatter one of the shells randomly penetrated a very obscure weak point in Hood's VERTICAL armour and impacted on the relatively tiny area of her 4in HA magazine. The simplified analogy is that if you prop a dartboard up 50 yards away and can consistently knock it over with a shotgun at that range then that is pretty good shooting, just as Bismarck / PE achieved during the Denmark Strait encounter. Now you can "knock the dartboard over" all day long with the shotgun and still NOT hit the dartboard's bullseye (magazine) with an individual pellet. As opposed to being a skillful shot by knocking over the dartboard, whether you hit the bullseye with an individual pellet is complete luck.
    4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1