Comments by "Stephen Walker" (@stephenwalker2924) on "Battle lines drawn as UK government plans to block Scottish gender bill" video.

  1. They are playing by a sub-clause in an official treaty the SNP hoped and thought they may have forgotten all about or wouldn't ever use. Whoopsy.
    9
  2.  @Alan_Mac  They meant Sunak has not faced the UK-wide electorate directly in a GE.
    8
  3. name every single one right now
    6
  4. You are conflating two things that have no possible relation or equivalence to each other. But carry on moving your mouth, why don't you?
    5
  5.  @zenbumblebee  If cis women don't flash their bits at each other, why would transwomen want to flash their bits at other women? I think this is just a personal fantasy of yours, to be honest.
    4
  6.  @markymark7803  I don't want to be a women. I'm a cis man. But I am cool and I believe in equality for all humans and living breathing creatures. We are talking about a tiny minority of people here. So live and let live. Embrace kindness and understanding before it's too late and your life becomes hard and joyless. And stop nicking my catchphrases.
    3
  7. and yet you have wasted twenty whole words on a subject you care nothing about...
    3
  8. hate women? snp seem to want more women to be created, surely?
    2
  9.  @mumblerapkilla5406  As opposed to soothing vitriol? Like, isn't vitriol always kinda burning?
    2
  10. good points well made
    2
  11.  @christophermc2  yes. transwomen are women and transmen are men. glad we got that sorted.
    2
  12. Don't apologise. Have the courage of your convictions. No matter how wrong and misguided they are.
    2
  13. "Clowns fighting over a freak show whilst the tents on fire" sounds like the first line of a Bob Dylan song that should exist but doesn't
    2
  14. At last! Clown World is with us! Yes! I want the outer planet aliens thing right now! Now!
    2
  15. fandabidozi!
    2
  16.  @zenbumblebee  the myth of the trans-deviant-criminal been watching to much psycho and silence of the lambs and dressed to kill
    2
  17.  @Aklith  Normal? Define normal. No one is normal. We are all extraordinary and complex and different human beings.Try imagining transpeople as real humans for a change.
    2
  18.  @markymark7803  Transpeople feel and think and know their own minds and bodies. Try to think of transpeople as real living and breathing human beings instead of hate slogans and political scoring points.
    2
  19. When you dissemble, you disguise your true intentions or feelings behind a false appearance. To dissemble is to pretend that you don't know something, to pretend that you think one way when you act another way. What does 'self-dissembling' mean? Hiding your true feelings or intentions from yourself?
    2
  20.  @wulfcogle9988  my particular skywizard is angry, repent, repent
    2
  21.  @graemecreegan6749  1. "So you believe 16 year olds are capable of diagnosing themselves of complex psychological conditions? 2. And that they should then be allowed to volunteer themselves for dangerous and irreversible (also extremely profitable for ‘healthcare’ companies) ‘treatments’?" 1. yes 2. yes
    2
  22. wood-dead cousin. love it.
    2
  23. use more words please, 007
    2
  24. beats scrapping over trickle-down Tory leftovers
    2
  25. There are many types of family. Please close your face hole.
    2
  26.  @DrumToTheBassWoop  Which side should toilet roll paper be placed?
    2
  27. "won't somebody think of the children!"
    2
  28.  @graemecreegan6749  Definitions from Oxford Languages: "UNCONCERN/ˌʌnkənˈsəːn/noun a lack of worry or interest, especially when surprising or callous. "he is famed for his ‘laid-back’ attitude, his apparent unconcern about his actions" Your character informs your arguments and beliefs directly. You are what you say and what you do. And as Forrest Gump has it: "stupid is as stupid does." Your arguments are narrow, bigoted and don't stand up to close scrutiny. Just like your character, it seems. now go away fly fly
    1
  29. "You can now change your gender on a whim" At last! Yipppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
    1
  30.  @markymark7803  You can create transwomen from biological men. You know, transwomen: people who are human and suffering and need love and kindness and understanding? Human beings. With feelings and vulnerabilities and pain. No? Forget it.
    1
  31. The Quaker man is so gay, he's outrageous!
    1
  32. Yes. Transwomen are women. And transmen are men. Great. Glad we got that sorted. Phew.
    1
  33. "Please join us same time same place tomorrow for more blind god rage. I've been Josie and you've been smashing. Bye!"
    1
  34. How many Scottish people support the SNP?
    1
  35. if you believe that transitioning gender is just some elaborate ruse for men to perv on cis women you are a very silly specimen
    1
  36. I think she's quite attractive..in a Janette Tough kind of way.
    1
  37.  @jebbo-c1l  hear hear
    1
  38. Virtue signaling doesn't exist. People just use the phrase to mean:" Hey, you good people over there! Stop doing good and kind and worthwhile things! You're making us bad, spiteful, smallminded people over here look bad!"
    1
  39. "no gender pay gap" BUT "guys get payed more" Stupid is as stupid does. But you do you, Forrest Gump.
    1
  40. 💯🫂
    1
  41.  @emm_arr  People who are uncertain or unsure or undecided or interrogating a certain topic or folks who just want to ask a question are allowed to post thoughts and questions on YouTube - so stop gatekeeping. You are also allowed to disagree with anyone and everyone on YouTube, including me. Hey! Free speech!
    1
  42.  @emm_arr  Then we agree. Hey!
    1
  43.  @emm_arr  You were rude and insulting and it's beneath you. You obviously possess a fine brain and a political conscience. So use it. Learn some manners and show some class. It goes a long way. And what's wrong with being silly every now and again? If Monty Python can do it so can I.
    1
  44.  @emm_arr  Not everyone is a Ruzzian bot or troll, you know? Stop trying to control everything. Try trusting people a bit more. Not everyone is worthless or stupid or trite. No one is perfect. Superciliousness is not a good look. Believe me, I know. End of lecture. thanks for reading.
    1
  45. There's a war going on in the middle of Europe right this minute ya big dozy onion.
    1
  46.  @DisturbedbyDeth  the old lie if I'm not mistaken?
    1
  47.  @graemecreegan6749  You don't care about transpeople as people. You have no concern for their well-being or feelings or problems. You just want to score political and ideological points. If you have a moral or ethical objection to transitioning just say so and have the courage of your convictions and move on. But don't pretend to be the troubled humanitarian you are clearly not.
    1
  48.  @graemecreegan6749  "ideologically captured individual..." What does that word salad even mean? I believe in something you think I shouldn't believe in? Empty buzzwords signifying nothing. I'm glad you admitted that transpeople may suffer 'potential' harm. The admission betrays your supercilious contempt and unconcern for them. And my contention that you don't comprehend or appreciate their suffering was an accusation, an indictment of your character, not an ad-hominem attack. Do you even know what 'ad hominem' means? Stop using it every time someone says something you don't agree with. Defend your character and your position if you think you are in the right. You are very fond and adept at telling people what to do and who they are - without even bothering to listen to them and actually find out about their real worries and needs. You are all ideology and no heart.
    1
  49. Couldn't agree with you more and I couldn't have put it better myself. Is there an army of transwomen out there in the world of public toilets and washrooms and changing rooms just secretly and impatiently waiting to get their hands on cis women? Well, the whole idea is simply laughable if it wasn't so scary and toxic an idea. The very idea...
    1
  50. anyone can enter women's toilets. they are not exactly designed after Fort Knox, you know?
    1
  51. "a shiver looking for a spine" I love that phrase. lovely. "This little flower, this delicate little beauty, this cream puff, is supposed to be beyond personal criticism…He is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up." --- Paul Keating 1944–Australian Labor statesman, of John Hewson, attributed.
    1
  52.  @garygray6545  Logorrhea: cacoethes loquendi, furor loquendi. Comme ci, comme ça.
    1
  53.  @garygray6545  Seeing as you can barely string two coherent words together, I'll refrain from explaining what 'ad hominem' means, you eristic dingbat. wink wink ha ha
    1
  54.  @garygray6545  stop winking at strangers ya wackadoodle
    1
  55.  @thegamingeconomist3831  I meant 'treaty' rather loosely, as a piece of legistration (an act: in this case, the establishment of the devolved Scottish Parliament with tax-varying powers and the Scottish Government) AGREED TO BY BOTH SIDES. The particular sub-clause I referred to was always sitting there, hiding in the detail like a horrible surprise, and was a CON-servative get-out rider they were inevitably going to whip out at some point or other. But I agree with you. An unfair veto that smacks of over-reach is what it comes down to in the end. Never expect the terrible Tories to play fair or stick to the truth (or the spirit, at least) of an agreement. Next time expect the unexpected and be smarter than them!
    1
  56. who they?
    1
  57.  @daffytree2605  "“Ideas are dangerous, but the man to whom they are least dangerous is the man of ideas. He is acquainted with ideas, and moves among them like a lion-tamer. Ideas are dangerous, but the man to whom they are most dangerous is the man of no ideas. The man of no ideas will find the first idea fly to his head like wine to the head of a teetotaller." -- G.K. Chesterton
    1
  58. because if I don't he will fall down.
    1
  59. Opinion. But thanks anyway, Dr. Garbutt, MD.
    1
  60.  @Hodgeyp3  great post.
    1
  61. "..and now here's our lovely Joanne Rowling with the weather..." 🙂
    1
  62. no
    1
  63. Egerton, Bolton
    1
  64.  @christophermc2  insults. lack of empathy. lovely.
    1
  65. lol
    1
  66. 12 rounds, no biting or scratching, love to see it
    1
  67.  @markymark7803  And yet most Tories think they can't win another election without Boris...
    1
  68. "Trans men are putting ketchup into their underwear to simulate a period" You are a first-class, golden-star, bright and shiny, fecking idiot. Period.
    1
  69. groomed by whom?
    1
  70.  @StinkyOrnstein  Ornstein. They shoot. They score. Most valuable player. Yes! You are fierce.
    1
  71. @Puppet Master opinion. not a universal medical consensus to be found on the subject. sorry.
    1
  72. That fantasy you paint in your head is just too vivid to not be a personal sexual fantasy of your own making that you get off on frequently. just too freakin vivid and detailed, dude.
    1
  73.  @zenbumblebee  Thanks for using the word 'nice' and calling me 'hon'. You are a real person after all. By the way, human sexuality comprises a myriad - a veritable plethora, an endless scaled world - of tastes, hang-ups, secret wishes, neuroses, kinks, instincts and interests. You can have any (and every) sexual fantasy that you like, hun. Nothing you said negates that fact.
    1
  74. I'm a duck trapped inside an elephant's body. Really.
    1
  75. *plebiscite. And some good points. But stop pretending to actually care about people you don't really give a damn-nickle about.
    1
  76.  @am1156  What?!? My dear old mum wouldn't know a trans-exclusionary radical feminist from a hole in the ground. Russian troll nonsense
    1
  77. top comment
    1
  78.  @Kharnivore2099  "You accuse others of writing "nit-picky semantic checks your brain can't cash", while losing yourself in "nit-picky semantic checks your brain can't cash". This is the slightly wordy lingiustic equivalent of: "Na, na, na! I know you are but what am I!" "It's quite simply the most retarded comeback someone makes when they've completely lost the argument..." --- Urban Dictionary I thought I made myself quite plain. It's not my fault you lack the comprehension skills to understand what I said. So I will make it easy for you. (apologies for shouting) BECAUSE THERE ISN'T A FIXED OR CERTAIN OR UNCONTENTIOUS OR UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED DEFINITION OF WHAT A MAN OR A WOMAN ACTUALLY IS! NO SUCH DEFINITION EXISTS! DON'T YOU GET THAT YET? ALL THE EXPERTS IN THE WORLD CAN'T EVEN BEGIN TO START TO AGREE ON THIS VERY COMPLEX SOCIAL CONSTRUCT WE CALL GENDER! Do your own research if you are so inclined and leave me alone.
    1
  79. Send for the thought police. They will sort this out. Long live Big Brother!
    1
  80.  @soundseeker63  "decent and civilised" ?? Your hatred and fear of transpeople is indecent and uncivilised.
    1
  81.  @edlewkowicz  No capital punishment, I'm afraid. Murder of any human is, of course, very very naughty.
    1
  82.  @sonofobi5052  cheese and trans-onion?
    1
  83.  @Kharnivore2099  "Listening" - a metaphorical figure of speech. We all know we are all reading these comments. Stop writing nit-picky semantic checks your brain can't cash. "You didn't create the definition." Okay then, who did? Was it more than one expert? Is there any disagreement between these so-called 'experts'? Where does any authoritativeness they proclaim to possess come from? What are the areas of agreement or certainty? Are there any possible differences of opinion or contentions or disputes surrounding the massively complex subject of human gender and human sexuality in which various scholars and scientists and whole societies have clashed and quarreled and compromised and agreed and then changed their minds again? I'm not certain or sure about anything. Because nothing is fixed or set in stone or immutable. The only certainty in life is uncertainty and the unchangeable fact that things always change.
    1
  84.  @am1156  Very mature. If the only argument you've got is to poke your metaphorical tongue out at folks and make a rude noise then don't bother. Such childish behaviour will only receive the contempt it deserves.
    1
  85.  @Kharnivore2099  Then feel free to define away. We are all listening...
    1
  86.  @doreeneb  DNA is changed and modified all the time. That's how scientists and doctors are now curing many diseases: giving the human body new instructions to alter, tweak, adjust and transform organic human life. The future of our species lies in the adaptation and alteration of our genetic code. Welcome to the 21st century and beyond..! "There's nothin' you can do that can't be done." --- John Lennon
    1
  87.  @markymark7803  How can transwomen be anti-women? They want to BE WOMEN. Why would anyone want to become a thing which they hate or want to cancel? Think about it: "I want to be a woman. Oh, and by the way, at the very same time I f*cking hate women. I want to be one but I hate them!" Stop being silly. Let go of your fear and hatred. They only eat the soul. You are welcome.
    1
  88. Who is responsible for this fact? Name expert names.
    1
  89.  @markymark7803  Women are certainly at risk. But it's cis men they should be concerned about. Not transpeople. The ugly face of danger for women is PC David Carrick. Not transwomen. Stop peddling hate and division just to serve your narrow views and unfounded prejudices. (funny how in these arguments transmen seem to remain invisible, almost as if most don't understand transpeople at all and don't care to...)
    1
  90. well put
    1
  91. St Columbus was as camp as f*ck, I'll have you know!
    1
  92. I'm sure people thought the same thought hundreds and hundreds of years ago. Humans have been crazy, are now being crazy, and will continue to be batsh*t crazy until humans cease to trouble the universe and the old gods finally stir themselves from their long Lovecraftian sleep...
    1
  93.  @jebbo-c1l  birds are real and some are quite fit
    1
  94.  @jamesfindlay7186  watch THE FULL MONTY (1997) and find your answer
    1
  95.  @gazsm1  You are comparing how a minority of people (who deserve our respect and kindness) think and feel and exist inside their private souls to a horrible disease that eats otherwise healthy tissue and kills it. The inapt and frankly disgusting analogy you are trying so desperately to make betrays your true feelings toward transpeople. You fear and hate them - and certainly you don't understand them and you don't want to. I was seriously considering flagging your pathetic contribution to this debate for hate speech. But you deserve to have your say at least, disgraceful as I find it. Goodbye.
    1
  96. what is not on your watch? what should be on your watch? or not?
    1
  97. Will they be? But will they be though? Will they really? Eh...no.
    1