Comments by "Raptor White" (@raptorwhite6468) on "Starship Explosion Video: Watch Elon Musk's Rocket Explode After Launch | WSJ" video.

  1. Looking at Saturn V start won't help, as it was completely different rocket, it had 5 strong engines instead of 33 not as strong ones. The rocket that's the most similar to Starship was N1 and looking at how it flew wouldn't be too helpful either...
    2
  2. ​ @mjjones8216  Future Starships won't be landing on water. That was the only reason it exploded.
    2
  3. Too late to say that. 54 years too late to be exact.
    1
  4.  @JH-si9oe  They did
    1
  5.  @JH-si9oe  So you just confirmed that your source is "I made it up"
    1
  6. Starship fuel is methane, which doesn't cause pollution when burned
    1
  7. Most of NASA's rocket parts fall into the ocean, but it's after it's burned in atmosphere. But you're right, it's impossible to get through something that doesn't exist
    1
  8. Russia doesn't have really good rockets
    1
  9. You're just three google searches away from realising how wrong you are: 1. Look up Starship fuel - it's methane 2. Look up what is emitted when methane burns - water and carbon oxide (II) 3. Look up greenhouse gasses - carbon oxide (II) isn't one So Starship doesn't cause global warming
    1
  10.  @Tony_265  Burning fuel probably didn't produce any, CO2 is Carbon Oxide (IV) and methane produces Carbon Oxide (II), which isn't harmful for the environment
    1
  11.  @Tony_265  I know, as I said it probably didn't emit any carbon dioxide
    1
  12. Yes, because burning methane emits water
    1
  13. Nearly all the fuel exploded, and the part that didn't turned into gas and even if it didn't, it isn't anything toxic, just methane.
    1
  14. Right now there's 7, but probably none of them wear diapers, because it's unlikely that someone is doing EVA right now
    1
  15. I wonder how many times China and Russia send the biggest rockets in the world.
    1
  16. You're just three google searches away from realising how wrong you are about that environment thing: 1. Look up Starship fuel - it's methane 2. Look up what is emitted when methane burns - water and carbon oxide (II) 3. Look up greenhouse gasses - carbon oxide (II) isn't one And btw. all the buildings are repairable
    1
  17. Yes
    1
  18. It does have fish eye lens, but that doesn't prove anything
    1
  19. You're just three google searches away from realising how wrong you are: 1. Look up Starship fuel - it's methane 2. Look up what is emitted when methane burns - water and carbon oxide (II) 3. Look up greenhouse gasses - carbon oxide (II) isn't one
    1
  20. Because making a rocket powered with electricity is impossible
    1
  21. Nope😊
    1
  22. Nope, Starship is fueled by methane, the worst thing it can produce is carbon oxide (II), so it doesn't emit any greenhouse gas
    1
  23.  @EvilChuckie  No, (II) stands for carbon being divalent, just like oxygen, so it's CO, not CO2
    1
  24. He did, rocket didn't explode by itself, it was detonated
    1
  25. I would, it costed a few hundred millions
    1
  26. You're just three google searches away from realising how wrong you are: 1. Look up Starship fuel - it's methane 2. Look up what is emitted when methane burns - water and carbon oxide (II) 3. Look up greenhouse gasses - carbon oxide (II) isn't one
    1
  27.  @EvilChuckie  I already answered you, but I can do that again: CO2 is Carbon Oxide (IV) not Carbon Oxide (II), because those numbers stand for valence, not amount of oxygen.
    1