Comments by "Anders Juel Jensen" (@andersjjensen) on "Russia Fears What is Coming from Ukraine" video.

@Lesmore187 Bookmark your comment and come back in 3-4 weeks and tell me all about how well that aged.
4
I'm scared of Kiwis now... I do NOT want to fight anyone who can do that dance with a straight face. I'm seriously questioning the core humanity of anyone who wouldn't puke from laughter trying to do that...
2
@glennkennedy9229 You... kinda missed the joke. Try reading it again a couple of times and you'll see that it's a complement hidden as a stab.
1
It's a cruise missile. Not a robot. Something got lost in translation.
1
@bjornh4664 Exactly. Something got lost in translation.
1
@Dimetropteryx Semantics are kinda irrelevant to the topic of correct translation between languages, but yes, there are probably a whole host of everyday items that aren't called robots that have, strictly speaking, started qualifying because chips and software is in bloody everything. But if we start calling everything with autonomy a robot things are going to get confusing pretty fast.
1
@Dimetropteryx Nonsense. If people start calling their self driving cars robots along with calling their vacuum cleaners robots things are going to get muddy. And calling it a robot-car and a robot-vacuum doesn't make any sense in daily speech unless you want to actively distinguish between a car and a self driving car, etc. The problem here was not fuzziness. The problem was translating too directly from Swedish to English. Plain and simple. A cruise missile is a cruise missile. It's a known concept that has a designated word in English. It's irrelevant what it is called in Swedish (or Hindu or Korean) in the English context.
1
@Lesmore187 No they wont. It doesn't help them in any way. Nuclear weapons have two use cases: 1) Wipe out millions of civilians, and 2) Wipe out large concentrations of enemy troops and equipment gathered in an area too large for conventional munitions. Russia knows perfectly well that if they chose 1 they're going to suffer at the very least as much as everyone else, but probably more. Nobody "wins" that kind of nuclear war. It just destroys humanity and the one who starts it gets hated for centuries by the few humans who have to restart civilization. They're also not going to chose option 2 because a) Ukraine doesn't have that kind of troop and equipment concentration anywhere on Ukrainian soil, and b) Russia has been told by NATO that if they want to go from "Allies support Ukraine" to "NATO shows up in full force and kicks ass" all they have to do is use a nuke. Russia has threatened to use nukes like 40 times. If they were going to, they would have by now. Nobody (sane) believes they ever will. Only anxiety ridden nutcases actually think they will. Even the vatniks and rusbots perfectly knows it wont happen, but just continue saying so in the futile hope it will change anything. And I'm fairly certain you're the latter. Since you started with "Next year they might be ready" and immediately went to "Russia will NUKE!" it's pretty clear that you're just trying to distort the information field. You have no consistent narrative. You'll just try and say whatever and see if something sticks. It doesn't. Russia is up against 40% of the world's entire wealth. Long term this is not sustainable for a country with an economy the size of Spain's. So, come back and tell me how "Maybe next year they will be ready" aged in 3-4 weeks. And since you piled on the extra bullshit, show me where on the map Russia launched a nuke in response to having the land bridge to Crimea cut.
1