Youtube comments of Grenade Tennis (@hughjass1044).

  1. 575
  2. I happened to hear a retired American general speaking on the radio quite some time ago. I don't know who it was or what the context was or even remember who the host was but he said something truly profound which I've never forgotten. The question came up about America's wars and whether they were winning or losing. The general said that before anyone identifies who won or lost, one must first understand "the game", who the players are and on whose behalf the game is being conducted before one can pronounce upon who "won." Most nations throughout history conducted military operations to repel foreign invaders, nullify some threat or conquer foreign lands to acquire territory for empire or to capture some kind of resource wealth. Whatever the motive and however one might perceive the righteousness of such an endeavor, there was at least some tangible reason for the operations and they were for some identifiable "good" to the nation, however tenuous. Today, America conducts its military operations solely to enrich its merchant class. The wars of the late 20th and early 21st centuries cost the nation historic amounts of blood and treasure and added not an ounce to its national security, reputation, prestige or standing. But the defense industry and their cousins in the rest of the corporate world made out like bandits! And since America is now fully owned and operated by the merchant class; which knows no boundaries, recognizes no nationality or sovereignty and holds no loyalty to any entity but itself, from their point of view, these wars have all been smashing successes.
    564
  3. 529
  4. 427
  5. 410
  6. 317
  7. 308
  8. 292
  9. 289
  10. 288
  11. 275
  12. 258
  13. 257
  14. 201
  15. 195
  16. Poland's position is entirely understandable and defensible. They have given more and spoken out more and done more than nearly all of their neighbors but there are limits. They also need to think about themselves, their own people, their own farmers, etc. I'm sure there is no ill intent towards Ukraine here but simply a need to think about their own affairs. So too is Ukraine's position if you remember the fact that they are still under attack and in such a situation, unlikely to always act in the most diplomatic of ways. They are no doubt utterly exasperated at trying to get the hardware they need out of the west and not just an endless string of empty platitudes. I'm sure it's this frustration that is coming to the surface rather than any ill feelings towards Poland. This situation is as unfortunate as it is understandable and most critically, foreseeable and entirely avoidable. It should have NEVER been allowed to deteriorate to this level. What we saw in Feb of last year was failed deterrence. What we are seeing today is failed leadership, a complete lack of resolve and will as well as a lack of any sort of plan or strategy for the future. Putin has seen that he has no chance of defeating Ukraine as long as the western allies are united behind it so his strategy has switched to one of destabilizing, dividing and weakening that alliance. Western leaders say all the time that they are united and strong but that's a lie and this situation is proof of that. Putin too knows it's a lie and with enough time, he firmly believes he can demonstrate as much. When alliances fray and crack, this is what it looks and sounds like. No one is more delighted to see this kind of thing than Putin. The champagne is surely flowing in the Kremlin tonight,
    194
  17. 193
  18. 190
  19. 177
  20. 168
  21. Most people will know that Justin Trudeau's father Pierre was also a Canadian prime minister from '68 to '79 and again from '80 to '84. He wrote a book about himself because.... of course he would. What narcissist doesn't think it's all about them and that the rest of the world wants to know all about them. In it, he outlines how among many other things, he wanted to fundamentally and permanently alter the nature of Canadian political and social life as well as the very fabric of Canadian society. He would do this by way of such things as a massive and all-encompassing social welfare state, the nationalization of certain industries, mass immigration and multiculturalism and a slow but steady movement away from the US led western sphere and toward a much closer and friendlier relationship with countries such as Communist China, the USSR and their various allied satraps in Africa and Latin America. He states in that book that three of the people he most admired were Lenin, Mao and Castro. It seems the apple does not fall far from the tree. His spawn has repeated much of what his father stated and on occasion, gone even further. When Castro died, he gave a heart wrenching, teary-eyed speech in which he referred to his "deep admiration and friendship" for Castro and has on multiple occasions, expressed his admiration for the basic dictatorial nature of the Chinese government. Both Justin and his father are socialists in the truest nature of the word. Not "democratic socialists" or "social democrats" but real, true Marxist socialists. But to advertise oneself and campaign as such is not a winning formula so each was pragmatic enough cloak themselves in the garb of moderates but each man as PM reached out to the actual socialist party we have here in Canada; the NDP, brought them into government and the relationship between the two parties was never closer and more cordial and cooperative than it was during the premiership of the two Trudeaus.
    163
  22. 158
  23. 147
  24. 143
  25. 143
  26. 143
  27. 132
  28. 130
  29. 127
  30. 123
  31. 120
  32. 120
  33. 119
  34. 118
  35. 117
  36. 115
  37. 112
  38. 109
  39. 106
  40. 105
  41. 104
  42. 103
  43. 96
  44. 96
  45. 94
  46. 94
  47. 90
  48. 85
  49. 84
  50. 82
  51. 82
  52. Greg was right about both Carville and Mahar. They care about themselves and their own lives first, last and always. They are both very talented in sounding reasonable and coming off as somewhat sensible but they fully support every single thing the Dem party stands for and would never vote anything but blue. I actually watched every single minute of that interview and as hard and irritating as it can be to sit through nearly two hours of two liberals bobbing their heads to whatever the other one is saying, it's also quite revealing. Two liberals, two people of like minds in a relaxed setting, drinks are flowing, a little smoke, they're comfortable in each other's company and that is when the guards come down and the truth comes out. That's when we find out who they really are and what they really think. They're both clever enough to not quite come right out and say directly what they're thinking and what they believe but not quite clever enough to realize that not everyone who sees and hears them is on their team and that we can see right through their act. Maher particularly, has made it his stock in trade to be the sensible one; the "old school liberal," the "classical liberal." That is a crock! Listen to him long enough and often enough and you'll see just how much of a crock it is. People who invent fake personas for themselves always reveal their true self eventually. People can't be "on" all the time, especially in a relaxed setting where they think they're safe. They always give themselves away.
    81
  53. 81
  54. 80
  55. 80
  56. 80
  57. 79
  58. 75
  59. 74
  60. 73
  61. 72
  62. 71
  63. 71
  64. 69
  65. 69
  66. 68
  67. 68
  68. 66
  69. 61
  70. 60
  71. 59
  72. 57
  73. 55
  74. 54
  75. 54
  76. 53
  77. 53
  78. 52
  79. 52
  80. 51
  81. 49
  82. 48
  83. 47
  84. 47
  85. 46
  86. 45
  87. 44
  88. 44
  89. 43
  90. 42
  91. 40
  92. 40
  93. 40
  94. 38
  95. 38
  96. 38
  97. The downside to these grand coalitions. Seriously though, when you group this many countries all together; all with differing interests, issues, concerns and priorities, vastly different cultures, peoples, histories, traditions and the like, into some grand project like the EU, you're bound to get problems like this. Today it's Hungary and Poland. Tomorrow? Who knows? Is it reasonable to expect them all to see eye to eye on everything? Is it reasonable to ask that if a much bigger and more powerful country like France or Germany were the one out of step with the rest, whether there would be such tumult? Finally, one must evaluate the benefits that the troublemaker brings versus the negatives and what the consequences might be for expelling or ostracizing them. Very often, you find yourself in a partnership or alliance with another nation who for some reason, is a constant pain in the butt. You often find yourself asking - "is this really worth it?" Prime example - Turkey and NATO. So the questions become 1) what CAN I do about this and 2) what are the possible ramifications if I do? Even if you could expel Turkey from NATO or Hungary from the EU... which you can't, so why are we even talking about it?... what other nation do you suppose would be right there like a dog at dinnertime waiting to scoop them up before the ink had even dried? Sometimes there is no reason to stay aligned with a country other than to keep them out of the orbit of another much worse one. But that's very often a damned good reason, despite how much of a nuisance they might be in the moment.
    38
  98. 37
  99. 37
  100. 37
  101. 37
  102. 37
  103. 37
  104. 37
  105. 36
  106. 36
  107. 36
  108. 35
  109. 35
  110. 35
  111. 34
  112. 34
  113. 34
  114. 34
  115. 32
  116. 32
  117. 32
  118. 31
  119. 31
  120. 31
  121. 30
  122.  @gogs8166  For the most part, that's true but I don't think you even need to go that deep to understand what's going on. It's not merely a question of ideology though that's certainly part of it but it's really more a matter of cultural resentment. Modern liberals... as opposed to classical liberals who are more in line with what we call conservatives today.... view themselves as an anointed class of people who are above everyone else and thus entitled to hold all the positions and levers of political, social and cultural power. As a result, they feel they deserve to be, and indeed expect to be, revered and respected without reservation or question. When they don't get the reverence they feel is their birthright, they get VERY annoyed and begin to lash out. When someone who is not of their class and clique gets a little too noisy or "uppity"... forgetting their place in the pecking order, you might say... the daggers and vitriol come out. "How DARE they??!!" This is why you don't hear that much difference in how they talk about doctrinaire or moderate conservatives. To them, there really isn't that much difference. They are not "like" them so that, in and of itself, is sufficient justification for the vitriolic, class based hatred that is the essence of their existence. They put on this grand show of concern about all things race and gender but the truth is they don't give a damn about any of it. All of it is just a set of tools with which to beat the "inferiors." They are in a particularly acute stage of apoplexy at the moment because the PM of Italy is a woman and the PM of the UK is a "brown" person.... two cohorts they feel they have the exclusive right of ownership over.
    30
  123. 30
  124. 30
  125. 29
  126. 29
  127. 29
  128. 29
  129. It's because of my "always expect and plan for the worst possible scenario" military training and background that I'm forced to always be the one to temper expectations and throw cold water on everyone's hopes but it needs to be said as many times as necessary until people get the message..... Regardless of everything you've seen and heard, regardless of everything that's happened and regardless of what anyone tells you, this war is STILL very much Russia's to lose. People need to understand that Putin or anyone who might replace him, simply does not think like someone in the west would think. He does NOT care about casualties. He does NOT care about equipment. He does NOT care about costs and most of all, he certainly does NOT care about public perception at home, largely because he's got everyone propagandized six ways from Sunday or in jail or driven from the country. Another thing - his capacity to produce/acquire "equipment" and "armaments" is without limits. Yes, it's all garbage and yes, it'll not last two days in combat but if nothing else, it'll use up some sort of western supplied weapon to destroy it and possibly a few Ukrainian soldiers as well and since he can keep this cycle going indefinitely, the west WILL tire of supporting Ukraine at which point, Putin wins. Ukraine needs to defeat Putin on the battlefield, fully, completely and permanently while Russia... or at least Putin, only needs to survive to be able to declare victory. If we in the west want to see an end to this war; an end that is final and not just one which will last a few years until Putin re-arms and re-equips, we're going to have to get a hell of a lot more serious about doing so than we have been.
    29
  130. 29
  131. 29
  132. 28
  133. 28
  134. 28
  135. 27
  136. 27
  137. 27
  138. 27
  139. 26
  140. 26
  141. 26
  142. 26
  143. 26
  144. 26
  145. 25
  146. 25
  147. 25
  148. 25
  149. 25
  150. 25
  151. 24
  152. 24
  153. 24
  154. 24
  155. 23
  156. 23
  157. 22
  158. 22
  159. 22
  160. 21
  161. 21
  162. 21
  163. 21
  164. 21
  165. 21
  166. 21
  167. 21
  168. 20
  169. 20
  170. 20
  171. 20
  172. 19
  173. 19
  174. 19
  175. 19
  176. 19
  177. 19
  178. 19
  179. 19
  180. 19
  181. I don't think there's any real risk of any of this happening for the simple reason that Putin is a whole lot smarter and cagier than people are giving him credit for. He's a man who can change up his game and his strategy unlimited times to suit his needs. True - the invasion was a mistake and I'm certain he's realized that long ago but many such as him have made similar mistakes in the past only to change strategy as many times as necessary and ultimately prevail. Putin banked on the weakness of the west and I remain unconvinced that he was wrong in doing so. Everyone is making a big deal out of all this supposed western unity but I've yet to see any real evidence of it. Yes, they have all talked a good game but to date, there's been very little in the way of concrete action. Putin has two great trump cards in his hand - grain and oil. When the world starts to really feel the pain of the loss of both of those commodities, you'll hear a different tune being sung. The world cannot replace the grain from Ukraine and Europe; for all its high sounding proclamations to the contrary, cannot do without Russian oil and gas..... and they know it. So does Putin. Look for Russia to continue to press the invasion until they've secured the Donbass then they'll stop. Sham referendums will be held and off he'll go to Europe with the two words which are the wet dreams of every western leader - peace and negotiations. At that point, he'll get most of what he wants and it'll be business as usual by the 1 year anniversary on 24 Feb 23. You heard it here first.
    18
  182. 18
  183. 18
  184. 18
  185. 18
  186. 18
  187. 17
  188. 17
  189. 17
  190. 17
  191. 17
  192. 17
  193. 17
  194. 17
  195. 17
  196. 16
  197. 16
  198. 16
  199. 16
  200. 16
  201. 16
  202. 16
  203. 16
  204. 16
  205. 16
  206. 16
  207. 15
  208. 15
  209. 15
  210. 15
  211. 15
  212. 15
  213. 14
  214. 14
  215. 14
  216. 14
  217. 14
  218. 14
  219. 14
  220. 14
  221. 14
  222. 14
  223. 14
  224. 13
  225. 13
  226. 13
  227. 13
  228. 13
  229. 13
  230. 13
  231. 13
  232. 13
  233. 13
  234. 13
  235. 12
  236. 12
  237. 12
  238. 12
  239. 12
  240. 12
  241. 12
  242. 12
  243. 12
  244. 12
  245. 12
  246. 12
  247. 12
  248. 12
  249. 11
  250. 11
  251. 11
  252. 11
  253. 11
  254. 11
  255. 11
  256. 11
  257. 11
  258. 11
  259. 11
  260. 11
  261. 11
  262. 10
  263. 10
  264. 10
  265. 10
  266. 10
  267. 10
  268. 10
  269. 10
  270. 10
  271. 10
  272. 10
  273. 10
  274. 9
  275. 9
  276. 9
  277. 9
  278. 9
  279. 9
  280. 9
  281. 9
  282. 9
  283. 9
  284. 9
  285. 9
  286. 9
  287. 9
  288. 9
  289. 9
  290. 9
  291. 9
  292. 9
  293. 9
  294. 9
  295. 9
  296. 8
  297. 8
  298. 8
  299. 8
  300. 8
  301. 8
  302. 8
  303. 8
  304. 8
  305. 8
  306. 8
  307. 8
  308. 8
  309. 8
  310. 8
  311. 8
  312. 8
  313. 8
  314. 8
  315. 8
  316. 8
  317. 8
  318. 8
  319. 8
  320. 8
  321. 8
  322. 8
  323. 8
  324. 8
  325. 8
  326. 8
  327. 7
  328. 7
  329. 7
  330. 7
  331. 7
  332. 7
  333. 7
  334. 7
  335. 7
  336. 7
  337. 7
  338. 7
  339. 7
  340. 7
  341. 7
  342. 7
  343. 7
  344. 7
  345. 7
  346. 7
  347. 7
  348. 7
  349. 7
  350. 7
  351. 7
  352. 7
  353. 7
  354. 7
  355. 7
  356. 7
  357. 7
  358. 7
  359. 7
  360. 7
  361. 7
  362. 6
  363. 6
  364. 6
  365. 6
  366. 6
  367. 6
  368. 6
  369. 6
  370. 6
  371. 6
  372. 6
  373. 6
  374. 6
  375. 6
  376. 6
  377. 6
  378. 6
  379. 6
  380. 6
  381. 6
  382. 6
  383. 6
  384. 6
  385. 6
  386. 6
  387. 6
  388. 6
  389. 6
  390. 6
  391. 6
  392. 6
  393. 6
  394. 6
  395. 6
  396. 6
  397. 6
  398. 6
  399. 6
  400. 6
  401. 6
  402. 6
  403. 6
  404. 6
  405. 6
  406. 6
  407. 6
  408. 6
  409. 6
  410. 6
  411. 6
  412. 5
  413. 5
  414. 5
  415. 5
  416. 5
  417. 5
  418. 5
  419. 5
  420. 5
  421. 5
  422. 5
  423. 5
  424. 5
  425. 5
  426. 5
  427. 5
  428. 5
  429. 5
  430. 5
  431. 5
  432. 5
  433. 5
  434. 5
  435. 5
  436. 5
  437. 5
  438. 5
  439. 5
  440. 5
  441. 5
  442. 5
  443. 5
  444. 5
  445. 5
  446. 5
  447. 5
  448. 5
  449. 5
  450. 5
  451. 5
  452. 5
  453. 5
  454. 5
  455. 5
  456. 5
  457. 5
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 4
  516. 4
  517. 4
  518. 4
  519. 4
  520. 4
  521. 4
  522. 4
  523. 4
  524. 4
  525. 4
  526. 4
  527. 4
  528. 4
  529. 4
  530. 4
  531. 4
  532. 4
  533. 4
  534. 4
  535. A few things to keep in mind about sanctions which most people don't realize....... 1) As money and investment are global in scope, a great many people from around the world have great amounts of money invested in other parts of the world. Therefore..... 2) Many people who you don't want to be affected by said sanctions... namely your donors, bankers benefactors etc.... will be affected if you don't lard them up with all kinds of exemptions, loopholes and work-arounds. Therefore..... 3) Most sanctions regimes are designed not to be particularly effective at their stated goal but instead meant to act as a sort of demonstration of virtue by the sanctioning entities. They are meant to LOOK like you're doing something because..... 4) The so-called Western democracies care about such things as human rights, or at least they like to pretend they do, while the rest of the world, including some of the wealthiest, don't give a flying f*ck about them but they're happy of course, to say all the right things to keep the aid $$ flowing and give cover to scheming western politicians trying to sell arms abroad and lies at home. 5) This is why it's often said that sanctions are what you do when you're too gutless to do anything meaningful. 6) Just because sanctions are "unprecedented" doesn't mean they're effective or sufficient in scale. They're very often designed that way. 7) North Korea and Iran have been under "crippling" sanctions for decades and the only people who've suffered are the citizens in both nations. The ruling classes haven't missed a meal and continue to live the high life and each country is measurably stronger militarily today than when the sanctions were applied. 8) If you're expecting sanctions alone to change the behavior of men like Putin, you're in for a big disappointment. It's going to take more that that... a LOT more.
    4
  536. 4
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. "But NATO is now much stronger....." Yeah; we'll see. There's been a lot of talk over the last few months but so far, precious little action. A wily old KGB dog like Putin knows many a trick to get around all that. The Russians well know the weaknesses of the west and are extraordinarily skilled at playing the long game. The General is quite correct when he says the goals are to divide and weaken the EU and NATO but that's a long term project which is only in its opening stages. A few setbacks early on aren't going to throw a guy like Putin off his game. Putin is patient and the west is vulnerable. Neither the peoples of Europe nor the US want confrontation with Russia and the armies of Europe are not up to one even if the people were behind one.. Also, Europe is heavily dependent on Russian energy and there is nothing close at hand which can even come close to replacing it. As well, groups as divergent as the North Koreans, the Vietnamese, the Taliban, ISIS and more have shown that the way you beat the west is to drag things out and slowly grind down their will and their resolve. The west's victories need to be quick or they won't happen. It may seem like Putin is on the back foot but he still holds an awful lot of cards. He's got the oil and gas which Europe needs, the grain and fertilizer that the third world needs, plenty of weaponry, lots and lots of cash and a population that's largely behind him. He's not beaten yet or even been substantially weakened regardless of what the talking heads say. The opening acts haven't gone as he'd like, it's true, but that doesn't mean the next ones won't. All he'd need to do is call a halt and ask for negotiations and diplomacy and Europe; particularly France and Germany would fold like a used newspaper.
    3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. A fine notion.... we'll see how long the sentiment lasts. I wish I could say I was confident that any of this big talk was going to be followed up by action, but I'm not. The financial crisis of '08 taught us valuable lessons about market regulation. Did anything change? No. The pandemic taught us valuable lessons about supply chains and self reliance. Will anything change? Not so far. Ever since the end of the Cold War, the west's default reaction to every problem is to find the cheapest, easiest, fastest and most politically expedient way out of it.... and then just carry on with business as usual as though nothing happened because if it does, it'll be someone else's headache. Russia is headed for economic collapse. It's going to default on its debt which means foreign banks aren't going to get paid. At the same time, Europe relies on Russia for nearly half of its energy and even if they went full bore away from that starting today, there are no other alternatives which would come on stream for 10+ years. At the same time, the absence of grains and fertilizer products from the region is projected to induce a worldwide price explosion in foodstuffs if not an outright famine in much of the world so combine all that with already sky high food and energy prices and you have your recipe for European and western leaders sitting down with Mr. Putin and making some deals that are very favorable to him and not to them. Western leaders will do what western leaders have always done.... make deals to buy their way out of a jam and worry about the consequences later.
    3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. Great dads are a key to success. Andrew has one and so did I. Nomad Dad talked about humility and character. I'm going to expand on that a bit by adding a couple of things my dad taught me; and which took me a while to really understand. "You never know who's watching you and you never know when and from where, opportunity may present itself." Out in the real world; the world of business and the world of life, you're going to cross paths with a LOT of people. Some you'll actually meet, most you won't but they could very well be observing you. If you stand out as either a good or a bad person, chances are, they'll remember you and if they happen to be someone in a position to benefit you, who knows where it could go. This is how my dad went from being a struggling auto mechanic to having a great lifelong career in a business he never would have pursued - because someone he didn't even know was observing him at work and liked the way he operated. It's also how I landed a really great retirement gig in a business I never would've considered. People you meet see you and are impressed with how you work and how you carry yourself could... right out of the blue... drop a dynamite opportunity in your lap. In both my dad's case and mine, if we'd been acting like jerks or displaying unfavorable personal characteristics.... getting angry, stressed out, losing our cool, not caring about our work... opportunities that we never even knew were waiting for us would've kept right on going and we'd never have even known. Have a great holidays, everyone!
    3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682.  @gemanscombe4985  Rockin'! 1) Barron has multiple times been dragged into needless and tasteless political attacks against his father (who is fair game) and his mother (who is not). "Attack" is a metaphor and attacks don't need to be either physical in nature nor direct to cause harm. Who attacked him? Mostly the Twitterverse but there were some off color remarks from news people and some stupid cooking show person. Regardless; not the end of the world but still pretty f*cking low! He's a child, a minor; he's off limits! 2) Kathy Griffin - DON'T even go there!! Everyone who saw that picture; EVERYONE, knew exactly what it meant and EXACTLY what it was a call to do. And don't give me that crap about being cancelled. Any cancellation she suffered was minimal and temporary and in most cases, those cancelling her had to be shamed and prodded into doing so. CNN initially stood 4 square behind her and only pulled her very reluctantly when the pressure to do so became too much. And today, she's right back where she always was; a leftist cultural hero! And don't cry; Gosar will no doubt be censured by the house as he should be. 3) Some CNN anchor; I believe it was Jake Tapper but I can't swear to that, retweeted someone calling for the Covington kids to be "disappeared;" again, a term with zero ambiguity attached, saying something like - "THIS!!! A hundred times THIS and TODAY!!" or something to that effect. It was deleted later but of course, but ONLY when the pressure to do so built high enough. To my knowledge, there wasn't a single word of apology offered for either the retweet nor the hell that those KIDS were put through after it was known full well that the story about them was bullshit. I won't even bother going into the hundreds of violent rioters, looters and criminals who've been bailed out, excused or even outright released without charges and then held up as heroes by the left. You get the picture.
    2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. I have some great ideas for how we can construct a well functioning society for the years ahead - 1) Abandon or disregard all of our alliances built up and maintained over decades. 2) Allow our military capabilities to rust out, rot, atrophy and fall apart. 3) Dismantle and sell off all of the redundancy and reserve capacities in our critical infrastructure. 4) Gut our domestic manufacturing capacities and transfer it all to our enemies which will A) enrich them as well as our own oligarch class at home, B) slowly kill off our middle class and most importantly C) make us totally dependent on nations which are hostile to us. 5) Close down our nuclear reactors - the only source of clean energy in existence with the capacity to provide power on the scale necessary for our society to function - and leash ourselves to a dirtier source from an openly hostile power. 6) Continue to live with blinders on, telling ourselves over and over that we are NOT seeing what we're seeing, that wrong is right or if it is wrong, then it's our fault anyway and the whole reason why hostile nations are hostile is that we haven't loved them enough and if we just give them more and more and more, eventually they'll come around. 7) Concentrate on the really important things like identifying all of the different ways we can be racist, who can use which bathrooms, pronoun usage and patriarchy. Because.... you know.... there is no real danger anywhere in the world and all of the other stuff will just fix itself.
    2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752.  @lessharratt8719  There's nothing wrong with a mixed fleet in principle. We used to have them in earlier times. But they got away from that for standardization reasons and to reduce costs. At one time, everyone had mixed fleets but in the pursuit of savings, we started demanding that each new purchase had to check more and more boxes. This really didn't deliver much savings since if their plane had to do more stuff, it was going to be more expensive to design and build. At the same time, consolidation and amalgamation has continued until there's now only a handful of makers. Currently, the F-35 comes closest to being that one best "all-in-one." I'm not one who worships at the alter of that plane; it does have its problems and I'm somewhat ambivalent about it but the thing is (was), we were already signed up partners in the project and had already gone 2/3 of the way down the road to buying it at member pricing when Shithead deliberately drove the bus into the ditch to win votes and now we're back to square 1. This is exactly like what the Shawinigan Sidewinder did with the helicopters 20 years earlier. Yes, I do think that contract was a bit pricey but we would've gotten a 1st class item and, like the F-35, we had a signed contract which we had to pay $500M to break, not to mention wait a further 25 years for a replacement with an inferior product at an ultimately higher cost! This, along with all the other procurement fiascos I've watched over my years in the military means I have zero confidence we'll do anything close to the right thing..... unless by some miracle it also happens to be the politically expedient thing.
    2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. I enjoy this guy's commentary and to a large degree, I agree with him. My only concern is that we're getting a little too far out in front of our skis here with all this talk of "Ukraine is winning this war" and "Putin is losing this war." All of this analysis could well be right and I hope to God it is but can we please stop this planning of the victory parade while the battles are still raging? For all the deprivations they're living with, Russia still has the capacity for nearly limitless destruction. They've got no high tech stuff left (or nearly none) but they've got literally millions upon millions of artillery shells and dumb rockets and thousands of guns and tubes to launch them. As well, they have have limitless capacity to produce as many more as they'll need because there's nothing high tech or difficult about producing those things. They've also got nearly 8000 tanks in reserve... outdated, crapped out old buckets to be sure but in those numbers, even the new stuff being sent to Ukraine won't be able to overcome it. Also, Iran and North Korea are sending shipments on a regular basis and you can't tell me China isn't contributing pretty heavily too, despite their denials. This war is NOT over yet or anywhere close to being over. Nobody has won anything yet. When you have a man like Vladimir Putin who is more than willing to send 5 million or more troops to the slaughter, second every ounce of manufacturing capacity to the war effort and sacrifice the very future of the country for his own vanity, you can't say anything's been won while he and his inner circle still draw breath. So let's stop talking about winning and get down to the serious business of actually winning. All that new gear is nice but how about some aircraft and a couple hundred thousand NATO troops to go with it all?
    2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. OK, first off, I like Walsh and to a large degree, sympathize with him and his position here but I also feel he's being just a touch too hyperbolic and Chicken Little himself. He's a good guy but he does have a reputation sometimes of being a bit of a drama queen. Let me state this for the record in terms as clear and plain as I can - the Republican Party is definitely NOT dying nor is it dead. It's having itself a bit of an episode just now, no doubt about that but, like every other party, it's had those before and survived and it'll do so again. You may view that as a good thing or a bad thing depending upon your outlook on things but I view it as a certainty. There has hardly been a major political party in existence which hasn't gone through turbulent times and also been prematurely written off as "dead" and in nearly every case, it has transformed itself and come storming back. That's precisely what parties do. I'm old enough and have been around long enough to have seen this pattern repeat itself over and over and frankly, so is Walsh. He should know better. Here's another fearless prediction - Donald Trump will not win the next US election because Donald Trump will not even be the Republican nominee. If you're paying close attention to what's actually happening right now... as opposed to what the blowhard commentariat are blathering about... you'll know that Donald Trump is a spent force whose influence is already starting to wain. He is a 3 time loser and the movers and shakers in the GOP... those people Walsh laughingly referred to as irrelevant.... are simply not going to tolerate a loser. You can already see the donors and organizers backing away from him. As for the voters, Trump certainly has a hold on his share of them... for now.... but at the end of the day, they'll do like every other Republican supporter will do... vote for whoever the nominee is. As much as they'll try to deny it, they'll come around and fall in line eventually. It may not happen in the next cycle; in fact, I'm betting it won't, but it will happen. There are enough lunatics in the Democratic Party that they'll see that they have no choice in the matter.
    2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. A bit off topic but I'm curious. I live in Canada. I would not say at all that I "idolize" Russia but I am somewhat fascinated by it. I've formed a few theories and I'd be curious to know if I'm correct or not. I invite responses because I'd really like to hear from others to help get an accurate picture. I have a friend who's Belorussian and another who's Russian and I've met and spoken to several others from each of those places and other ex-Soviet and East European republics. Admittedly, they are all 40+ people as am I and that's the demographic who I generally associate with so I'd like to hear from some younger folks to see what they think. From speaking to them, I get the impression that it's not so much a case that the people love Putin, Lukashenko, Orban and the others, it's more a case that they recognize that they need someone like that because their countries would be in far worse shape than they are now if they didn't have someone strong in power. The thinking is that the ultra powerful; the oligarchs, are going to run everything anyway so it's preferable to have a leader who has at least some kind of control over them. They are also reminiscent of "the old days" when Russia was feared and respected and are quite content that the rest of the world at least pays them some kind of serious attention again. Add in the fact that Russians and others are just as proud of their heritage and their countries as anyone is and they're not at all interested in having them criticized; especially by Americans. Am I at all correct in any of this?
    2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. For something in the order of 40 odd years now, the west has been indulging itself in a sort of fantasy that other nations; many of which were and are, sworn enemies, can somehow be brought around to the light if only we'd engage with them more. This is a manifestation of the peace-at-all-costs progressive left's attitude that there are no bad people and no bad countries and if some of them act that way, it's only because we don't love them enough and we're not inclusive enough and we're generally too mean to them. In other words, like nearly everything wrong in the world, it's somehow OUR fault. This has led the modern western liberal political class; perhaps the most gullible, naive, stupid, willfully blind and cowardly in history, to throw the lessons of millennia past onto the trash heap and, led along by a merchant class that can't believe its luck, dive head first into the swamp of total engagement, unlimited exchanges, free trade and friendship.... all while the Russias and Chinas of the world bust a gut laughing at us behind our backs while they count the cash we've been gifting them. This has resulted in the de-industrialization of the west, the death of our middle class - an anomaly in history, unique to western democracies - and of course, the nuclearization and massive expansion of aggressive Chinese military power. What China and those like it have today, they have because WE gave them the means to acquire it. The invasion of Ukraine was a frozen flounder across the face to many of these idiots but it seems that it's still a lesson they realize they have to learn but really don't want to. Certain European leaders... cough.. Scholz.. cough... say all the right things but in the next breath, betray their desire to forget the whole thing ever happened and go right back to the way things were... before. Likewise, most of the rest of Europe seems to want their cake and eat it too. They know full well the threat that China represents and they know they need to do something about it.... but they really don't want to preferring instead to just wait and hope that if they ignore the problem a little while longer, the whole mess will just evaporate somehow.
    2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. The reason America doesn't see it is because no one shows it to them. No one tells that story. Every person with a platform or any degree of cultural power at all, which includes all major media; conventional and social, is invested in ginning up as much fear and rage and division as possible in a cheap quest for ratings and profit. At the same time, we have a situation where the entirety of both parties is consumed in performative partisan stunts, games, and brinksmanship in the search for any tiny fragment of advantage and utterly without concern for the wellbeing of the nation. Who is the person who speaks in uplifting tones, seeks to unify and cross boundaries? Who has a positive message today? Who is out there making the case for why Ukraine is important? Why NATO matters or why truth and accountability matters? Who are the ones setting positive examples? Who is saying "follow me?" We have a president who can't finish a complete sentence, walk a straight line or on most days, tell you what day it even is and his main opponent is facing 91 felony charges, never made a truthful statement in his life and has been renowned as one of America's all-time leading con men and sleaze bags yet is thought of as a God! What are our kids being taught in schools? To hate their country. That it's a great evil. That they should be fearful of their neighbors. That they need safe spaces. That segregation is good. That they're oppressed. That they're victims. That Osama bin Laden was a hero and that Hamas is good. What the f*ck is wrong with this picture?! America looks wonderful to anyone outside of it who wants to come here but they do not see the cultural and institutional rot on the inside.
    1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. Points to consider - 1) Putin is into this thing WAY over his head. He's now well past the point of no return. There is NO turning back now. He couldn't quit now even if he wanted to. He'd be dead in a week. 2) There is now no way for him to achieve an outright victory on the battlefield so what's left? What advantages does he have and what can he use? The answer - numbers. And he has those in abundance! 3) When you don't care about cost, when you're prepared to throw away a million lives if that's what it takes, and when you see that your enemies' allies are only giving them penny packets of weaponry and are fussing and fretting about even doing that much and have to be arm-twisted and badgered into every single arms shipment because they're stark, raving terrified of you and collectively soil their clothes whenever anyone says the word... gasp!... escalation!... what do you do? How do you leverage that fear and turn it in your favor? 4) You wear them down, that's what you do. You send wave after wave of bodies and wave after wave of vehicles. Yes, the bodies are barely trained and even worse equipped and the vehicles are complete junk but they all make the Ukrainians use up ammo to defeat them and make the west have to supply more. It's called attrition and the Russians can keep this going practically indefinitely. 5) I've been saying it for a year and I'll keep saying it. Russia WILL drag this out as long as they have to UNLESS we in the west stop pissing around, step in and put an end to this thing, once and for all!
    1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. I was very anxious to watch this video and especially to hear the experiences of actual Germans because I wanted to see how they line up with people I know who've lived in Germany. I myself have never been there but as an ex- army guy, I know many people who have lived there for extended periods and travelled around the country extensively. Many have told me that the younger generations of Germans feel that such things as remembrance, accountability, contrition and education are important but they also want to start moving on from that period and stop focusing so much on a time that was nearly eight decades ago and that none of them had any part in. They want to start to feel pride in being Germans again the way other nationalities do and not to be made to feel shameful about expressing that pride publicly. They feel that their nation has paid adequate attention and homage to its past sins and that the entire world is a far different place today then it was then and they want to see Germany start to step forward and take its share of the responsibility for making and keeping the world safe. Prime example - Ukraine. Making sure it "never happens again" means not happening anywhere, not just at home. On the other side of the coin, there is a not insignificant sector of the German left who delights in continually beating their nation over the head with the sins of the past to keep it suppressed and shamed and to increase their own political influence and power. This creates an inevitable backlash which often manifests itself in unfortunate ways such as the rise of the AFD and other such movements. I'd be interested to hear if this analysis is partly, fully or not at all correct.
    1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. A cross between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders (at least the "advertised" versions of each before they both sold out and became standard grade "party" men at the worst possible moment) doesn't sound all that bad, actually. If you disregard the bleatings of the hardcore partisans, there's actually quite a bit of overlap between the two; at least insofar as the desires of those who'd be inclined to vote for them. They're both populists of a sort (or at least, talked like populists) and there was actually a considerable number of their supporters who had the other one as their 2nd choice. Imagine that! In many ways, they (or at least their supporters) both wanted to get to much the same place. It was only a matter of some disagreement about how to get there. Don't know much about this NZ woman except that the mainstream press all act like teenagers at a Justin Bieber autograph signing whenever she is even mentioned (which is NEVER a good situation!) but one thing is clear from the results of both the NZ and USA elections....... the voting public is actually quite patient and forgiving as long as they think you at least give a fuck about them! They know you'll never be perfect and you don't have to be. Hell, you don't even have to be competent;... look at Cuomo, FFS!! But you do have to at least appear to take people's concerns seriously and not come off like the voters are your enemy! Talk and act like you give a fuck and you'd be surprised how many will support you! Wow; what a concept!!
    1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. I really believe that if I hear the phrase "escalate the war" one more f*cking time, I'm either going to scream or hunt down the person who said it and wring their goddam neck! This is nothing but the worst form of wanton, craven cowardice. You know who has not an ounce of fear about escalation? Putin, that's who, and we are the reason why. We have shown him exactly zilch to be afraid of. There have been what, 200, 300 thousand casualties so far and something close to a trillion dollars in damages to say nothing of the millions of lives turned upside down and the enormous cost and strain put on already stretched western governments and all because we in the west utterly failed to so much as even lift a finger to prevent this war. Putin was marshalling troops and equipment and conducting training at least 6 months prior to this thing, right out in the open for all to see, not the least bit concerned about who saw it all or knew about it and what did we do? Sat on our fat asses with dumb looks on our faces! If we had matched him troop for troop and tank for tank, right on Ukrainian soil, started stationing naval task forces in the Black and Baltic Seas and repositioning strategic air assets to Europe and Turkey as well as ballistic missile submarines to the Med and the Arctic and let it be known we'd have exactly zero hesitation to use any or all of them and if Putin didn't like it, he could damned well do something about it.... if we had done even half of that PLUS the sanctions... this war does NOT happen! But we did NONE of that and to make matters worse, we've dumped the whole responsibility onto Ukraine's lap while giving them penny packets of equipment... just barely enough for them to not lose and even then, only after months of begging and pleading. For the love of almighty God; start pouring firepower and if necessary, personnel into that theater of war and END this f*cking thing NOW!!
    1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. Here in Canada, there's kind of a running joke that comes up now and again, depending on the situation, that one day, the US will just absorb us and make us the 51st state. To this, many people reply that it wouldn't be worth their while to do so since if they did, they'd be responsible for us and have to look after us and since they already control everything of importance anyway.... the narrative goes.... and we're no threat to them, why bother, as the other old joke goes, "buying the cow when you already get the milk for free?" As you say, Russia already controls everything of even marginal importance in Belarus and their leader is a reliable and loyal puppet. I have a friend who is Belorussian and he's explained to me several times that Putin isn't really bothered at all by former Soviet states, including Ukraine, being sovereign countries since he doesn't view that distinction the same way we would. He looks at things in terms of him being in control of anything in his neighborhood which he covets. In short, you answer to him and do what you're told, when you're told, and in other matters, do what you want. If you refuse, "nice little country you've got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it." If Ukraine had decided to follow the same path as Belarus... or more accurately, Lukashenko's Belarus, all would have been fine but they did not and likewise, if the Belorussian people had been successful in toppling Lukashenko, Ukraine's fate would likely also have been Belarus's
    1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. You know Russians, I know Russians, lots of people know Russians and many of the ones I know tell a somewhat different story about Navalny than what the western media likes to tell and that is that in reality, he was not what he was portrayed as. The western media is prone to manufacturing a certain image of people like Navalny based on the kind of person they'd like him to be and then pushing that on their audiences. In the first place, he was as much of a nationalist as Putin is. In fact, most Russians are. That's why Putin is as popular as he is. Very few people in the west understand this fact about Russia or they willfully blind themselves to it. Navalny believed, as Putin does, in the expansion of Russia's borders and the re-establishment of the Russian empire. He supported the annexation of Crimea (again, the vast majority of Russians do) and the oppositions that he may have held to the Ukraine war had more to do with the way it was being prosecuted than anything else. In short, he was not the saint that many in the west think he was. Secondly, and more importantly, he was admired in many circles in Russia for his opposition to corruption but not taken seriously as a leader. Many of the people I know have said that if he had ever stood for election against Putin in a free and fair contest, Putin would still win in a rout and that's because for whatever faults he may possess, Putin is seen as a strongman that can control the oligarchs and command respect abroad while Navalny was seen as a principled but terribly naïve figure who'd be unlikely to gain power and would probably be eaten alive by the thugs and gangsters who really rule Russia if he did.
    1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. A slight clarification on India vis-à-vis Russia..... They are not and never have been, fiercely pro-Russia. They are not fiercely pro-anybody. What they are is fiercely neutral, nationalistic, proud and independent. They are not interested in being in anybody's "camp" and the harder somebody tries to push them into one, the more they resist and turn towards the other. They are the modern embodiment of Lord Palmerston's famous quote - "We have no permanent allies and we have no permanent enemies. What we have are permanent interests." As Modi has said - "I have 1/7th of the world's population. I'll make my own camp." They have always kept their doors open to most anyone but they refuse to be anyone's "cheap date." They're not about to just fall in line with either the US, Russia, Europe, China nor anyone else just because someone thinks they should but they do take great pleasure in being obstinate and refusing to sing off of someone else's song sheet. One thing they've never forgotten, or forgiven, was the US siding with Pakistan in the early days. The US may have felt they had their reasons for doing so, but from the Indian perspective, that is something that won't be soon nor easily overcome and it is that as much as anything that pushed them closer to the Soviets. There are however, some serious cracks forming in the India/Russia relationship as India doesn't particularly enjoy being associated with a pariah state. They have also begun the slow but steady transition of their military away from Russian sourced gear towards that from western sources. The big winner in all that? The USA? Uh-uhh. France! See what I mean about India not wanting to dance to Uncle Sam's tune?
    1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. A couple of things that folks need to understand here. First of all, anyone who thinks the Ukrainians are doing this on their own are delusional. They're a plucky, determined bunch no doubt about it, and my hat's off to them but remember that just 30 years ago, the Ukrainian military and the Russian military were one and the same and went by the title of "Soviet" military. So whatever failings the Russians had and still have, the Ukrainians were not long ago part of the very same military culture and would have inherited the very same thinking and behavior as the Russians. But the determination to be independent of Moscow's boot and that small matter of the 2014 war made them reassess matters and when western countries saw an opportunity and offered their assistance and support, Ukraine wisely said "why yes, we'll have us as much of that as you can spare." So what we have today is nothing like the Ukrainian military of just 8 years ago but instead, a well motivated, well trained and increasingly well equipped and well financed modern military. The Ukrainians knew this day would come eventually and have been building up to prepare for it. The US and NATO also see this as a chance to deplete Russian forces and weaken the country and Putin's rule. They're throwing everything they possibly can into the fight to ensure Putin loses and the war doesn't spread. You can bet that Ukraine has access to the very best satellite imaging and intelligence as well as a boatload of advisors, trainers and technical assistance. You can compare it to a tungsten fist (NATO) inside a leather glove (Ukraine). Secondly, Russian forces have never been the supermen the press and movies have made them out to be. They've always been primarily a conscript army with very poor quality equipment, training and leadership. They could always easily make short work of weak countries like Syria but never did have the ability to take on something like the US armed forces. I was stationed in Germany in the 80s and we witnessed their ineptitude and incompetence first hand and I can say that the only things that ever saved them from being annihilated were their nukes.
    1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. The central problem here is that sanctions are only ever of limited effectiveness and the larger and more powerful the sanctioned body, the less effective they are. They are in the end, only one tool in the toolbox but the west has long ago gotten into a way of thinking that they're the only tool and that they're the solution to everything. They're not! Anyone who applies sanctions and doesn't expect them to be evaded isn't a very bright person and if you really want these minor players to go along with them then you're going to have to offer them something else to make up for their losses. For example, the west is irritated that India is still buying so much oil from Russia but the west hasn't offered India any practical alternative so what are they supposed to do? And expanding upon that point, it isn't as though we've given the Indias of the world much more reason to trust us and cozy up to us. Many nations, including specifically these Central Asian nations, are not necessarily Russia's friends and they're not particularly thrilled at what Russia's doing but the reality is that if they went along with these sanctions, their economies would suffer greatly too; quite probably much more than Russia's would. Sanctions are a good opening act but there has to be a follow-up and if the sanctioned party sees that you don't have one, or that you don't have the guts to use it, then they have successfully check-mated you and it'll be you who ends up with egg on your face. This is increasingly the situation in which the west finds itself. They throw a pretty formidable first punch but the target gets back on its feet and says "what else ya got?" and we end up shrugging our shoulders and muttering "not much."
    1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. The sanctions are biting hard but they're still not biting nearly hard enough. They're still chock full of loopholes, exemptions and omissions, largely because so much of our own criminally corrupt billionaire class.... who double as party donors.... is so closely tied to and woven into the fabric of Russia's. This war could be over today if the west wanted it to be but there are still too many dirty little secrets to be kept hidden, too many ill-gotten or outright stolen fortunes to be guarded and too many criminal butts to be covered. Just this morning, my own (Canada) overaged student council LARPing as a government announced a 35% tariff on Russian and Belorussian imports. Wow... 35 whole percent... Imagine that! Putin must be curled up in a corner having a panic attack over that! If the west was serious about stopping this murderous aggression, they'd freeze every single asset in every single bank and give Russia 24 hours to get every last boot off of Ukrainian soil or those assets would be seized permanently. Simultaneously, I'd give the Chinas and the Indias of the world the same 24 hours to decide whether they want to have business, financial and diplomatic relations with Russia OR the west because it won't be both. At the end of that time, the decision will be made for them. But of course, none of that will happen. You'd need to have nations that haven't been operating as dumping stations for cheap dollar store junk for the last 40 years while selling off their industries and selling out their middle class. You'd also need leaders who cared about something other than the balances in their campaign accounts and the next polling cycle. Sucks to be you, Ukraine.
    1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1