Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "The Genetics of Prehistory." video.

  1. I mean it isn't but neither is a table but we won't say tables don't exist.
    3
  2. I mean, when reading the comments and seeing actual race realists disowning his claims, I would have to disagree.
    3
  3. Lol, no stop being stupid. Multi-regional hypothesis still supports most of your genes coming from African originated Homo Sapien and Homo Sapien Sapiens, it more just recognizes the fuzziness of specific boundaries.
    3
  4.  Huwhite Death  Same could be said for most language groups, even the most heavily studied indo-european we weren't still sure, people still throw around aucasus and further North into Russia for pre-indo-european but we will still give the most likely answer of the pontic-caspian steppe when asked in education and the same should apply to Afro-Asiatic, in whose case is between Sudan and Ethiopia.
    2
  5.  @TheEvolver311  "we also don't try to apply the "theory of tables" to explaining human history do we" And very few people that think that race is a thing use it to directly explain history. "Also literally not a observable thing which is why it isn't scientific" How is it not an observable thing? We literally have modern Europeans, Greeks and Arabs and maybe even chinese all identifying Sub-Saharan Africans as "black" but it is somehow "not observable"
    2
  6. What if Tang continued their expansion into Central Asia after the Battle of Talas (None of the rebellions that followed after that crippled the dynasty)[Also the Sassanid dynasty had gone to Tang China and its prince was there at the frontlines of the Battles against the Caliphate, I imagine that if the Tang are relatively triumphant he would be made a vassal King or commandary on a Tang Iranian protectorate]. What if Viking expansion took them all the way to West Africa, establishing trade routes btw West Africa and Europe through the Atlantic by 1000 AD. What if Portugal and Ethiopia allied to destroy Mecca. What if the Ottomans conquered Rome.
    1
  7. Or more likely the alternative hypothesis that Euroepans and Ameridians just have the same ancient ancestors?
    1
  8. And what's your sauce for this bullshit claim.
    1
  9.  Huwhite Death  "The definition of race is completely scientific" Very few concepts are "fully scientific" not even stuff like the definition of a second is free from social bias so no. What matters more is consistency.
    1
  10. So what are you trying to say that Aztec civilization was founded by Europeans?
    1
  11. The Tarim Basin Mummies have been proven to not be Indo-European. Recent Genetic studies prove this, none of their mummies had red hair and the claim they do came from mistranslated text. Edit Also, Africans are resistant to not immune to tropical diseases.
    1
  12.  @BurnBird1  If believing there is any differences between the "races" makes one a race realist then basically everyone is. For example there was a famous BBC documentary a few years ago that concluded that Usain Bolt is so fast because genes unique to West Africans that he has. Similar explanation has been give for Kalenji endurance and European greater average height. Are we now all race realists?
    1