Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. ​ @kurokagethescrub9627 no, Pol Pot wins.
    15
  2. 00:23 Question 1: German Strategy in 1942 07:07 Question 2: Slides for different ideologies and Third Positionism 11:06 Question 3: Why I don't use Russian sources (Google Translate) 23:28 Question 4: Soviet Storm series vs US/UK Curriculum 33:54 My story about school education and teachers 39:06 Question 5: Home Schooling and Copying my videos 44:26 Question 6: Teacher in California, WW2 Fiction, Richard Darre and the German economy 52:11 Question 7: Nomothetic and Idiographic, and the Bible. 01:01:10 Question 8: Russian defense of the Ossipov-Lancaster Equations (Nigel Askey) 01:11:04 Question 9: Channel management, Patreons, financial situation and workload.
    10
  3.  @joshjones1503  maybe by modern definitions of fascism defined by socialists and liberals but fascism, the ideology that came out of Italy in the interwar period was a distinct and independent ideology from the nationalist socialism that came out of germany.
    3
  4. Eh, ideas like superior race or race better at doing X. Probably existed for millenia with Romans, Chinese, Mongols etc basically every Eurasian Empire after a time. Not nearly as concrete of an ideology as it became in 1800s-1900s Europe but the root idea certainly was there.
    3
  5. I don't agree with some of the arguments put up here like the "official" and essence based definitions for Capitalism and Socialism but the idea of Hitler basically being a "Race Socialist", seems to hold up.
    2
  6. ​ @CelticMysticSeer  Due this is Europe that has been 1500 yrs Christian. Of course anything that develops out of Europe is gonna have Christian heritage. In the same way that ur quote says far rightoids recognize the Christianity in Marxism, Leftists have claimed for decades now that Fascism is Christian.
    2
  7.  @ImperialSenpai  And in that short time his mad regime killed over a quarter of Cambodia. He is definately winning the worst.
    2
  8. Based and PostModernity pilled.
    1
  9. Is it false tho?
    1
  10. oh, no socialists can't fight each other now?. I guess the Menkevicks were capitalist industralists and the Black Army was working for the CIA.
    1
  11. Truly this has to be a watching a completely different movie than the video that is on screen moment.
    1
  12.  @czar6203  I mean, bro, he literally called the DPRK democratic and authoritarian so, ur argument wouldn't work against his claims as he phrased it.
    1
  13.  @czar6203  What about nationalist socialists and I am not talking of NAZIs but pre-Fascist Italian socialists that believed in the concept of a proletarian nation against the imperial powers. Similar ideas are in like African socialist nations as well and arguably, China.
    1
  14. What of calling Hitler a "Race Socialist".
    1
  15. Link to the video on how Socialism developed into Fascism in Italy.
    1
  16. Eh, religion is too strong of a word for this, more a few jumbles of ideas.
    1
  17. I don't think it disproves his argument but yeah, thanks for the extra info.
    1
  18. based and redpilled
    1
  19. ​ @soulknife20 Isn't Communism just a subset of Socialism?
    1
  20. I am looking for a video by TIK where they talk about Italian socialists having an idea of Italy as a proletarian nation.
    1
  21. Why would a Fascist have an issue with anti0semitism?.
    1
  22. Well, what else should I expect from Children of Yakub.
    1
  23. Tik you should take out veritas et caritas counter arguments to your points. He's the best easily accessible leftist that argues against you.
    1
  24. ☕
    1
  25.  @jacqdanieles  Mao only wins cuz of the size of china. If you do it per capita like I am Pol Pot wins no cap.
    1
  26.  @ImperialSenpai  I mean, Mao didn't kill over 1/4th of China while Pol Pot killed over a 1/4th of Cambodia and that alone convinces me Pol Pot was worse.
    1