Comments by "marre sjepie" (@marresjepie1887) on "Russia Already Lied About Destroying M2 Bradley Vehicles" video.
-
20
-
10
-
8
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
聽@urkiddingme6254聽 Weight is not the problem. Leopard 2A4s also weigh-in at around 50 tons fully loaded. The "The bridges won't hold them" was a sad attempt from professional Russian trolls to delay, or even stop delivery of heavy western tanks. "The bridges won't hold Leopards.." and yet, a column of T-72's is no problem.. "Something doesn't add-up here". However, yes, the Abrams is a shocking gas-guzzler that needs many fuel stations along its routes. It also doesn't do fech-fech (very thin dust) very well. Runs hot as heck too (less of a problem in Ukraine..) So, no ducking away at it's rear when bullets start flying.. They d贸 make good 's mores, though, if a bit of a jet-fuel taste is Your thing.. 馃ぃ ) It was already a bit of a problem in Iraq, and later Afghanistan. The Leo's had a far bigger range than the M1, AND ran on anything, from diesel to cooking-oil. Buuuut.. the M1 was far better armoured against IED's!! The early Leo's f.i. had too thin armour around the driver. Drivers lost their legs. Something the M1 already had covered.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1