Comments by "marre sjepie" (@marresjepie1887) on "Why Has Ukraine Not Been Given ATACMS?" video.
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmm.. I guess when Ukraine keeps advancing, even if by only a couple of tens of kilometres per push, long-range ATACMS also lose their utility. HIMARS will be 'in range' in due time, as are M177 and Caesar artillery, and every kablooie will stay 'affordable'. ATACMS are nice as a deterrent and shock&awe weapon, but at that cost, I can see why the US isn't too enthusiastic about supplying them, let alone that AA argument. It all makes sense, suddenly. I was getting a bit annoyed at the refusal to supply ATACMS, tbh, but now it all fell into place. Thanx Jake. Informative and thought-provoking in one go. Good form, laddie!
On a side-note: That tidbit about anti-radar missiles getting into Ukraine hands, ànd already being deployed, is promising afa the next step in the "Get the Orcs out of my face-project" goes. F16's over Ukraine. Who'd have thought..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1