Comments by "marre sjepie" (@marresjepie1887) on "Russian Soldiers Keep Turning On Each Other" video.

  1. That's the thing that àctually worries me. By now, it must be pretty clear to those annexed RF states that the 'feared Russian army' is a bit of a paper tiger, and that only the mercenaries exhibit something like "military prowess".. Many of those states house ICBM launch bases, and other nukes, ànd -thanks to Russia's Cold-War habit of trying to spread the risk of not being able to shoot back when Russia gets nuked, some of them àlso have their own launch keys.. And to add to the risk, many have blood-feuds running for centuries with their neighbours. The brutal power of the Russian army that kept them from going for each others' throat has fallen away to a large part. It only needs a spark for (nuclear) hell to break loose. Probably also one of the reasons that Putain is so cruel in ordering attacks on civilian targets: To make it look as if he's still a "Strong Man" to those states.
    2
  2. Aww.. boohoo..
    1
  3.  @JakeBroe  Auwtch.. Mr Rodney Jones is about to have a hard collision with reality, me thinks..
    1
  4. 🤣
    1
  5. The thing is: It was the Russian Army that -brutally, kept the 'peace' i.e.: kept religious and nationalist groups from wiping each other out.. Those soldiers are now being fed to the Ukrainian meat-grinder.. No more soldiers to keep the age-old feuds at bay.. And RF states that hate each others' guts have nukes stationed within their borders.. AND the keys to those nukes (part of the old Soviet-doctrine of spreading the risk, might Russia itself get nuked) "What could go wrong"
    1
  6. Aww.. boohoo.. Widdle Tucker-cultist is twiggered..
    1
  7. Ukraine lost 60 to 100 soldiers a day in the beginning, Zelensky openly admitted that. It's a bit less now Ukraine can pummel the orcs from afar when needed. The amount of killed civilians that we know of is 200,000+ If you're a "former Journalist" It shouldn't be too hard to find-out the actual numbers. "Multiple sources" and such. The 'standard" theory of military engagements also postulates 3- to 5 invaders KIA for every defender. Do a bit of homework..
    1
  8. Guy's just a blow-hard. Russia cannot even provide its own conscripts with proper gear and weapons. I've seen worse on Russia's propaganda-laden TV.. Open calls for full-on genocide, nuking Europe, and even The USA.. Absolute nut cakes, the lot of them.
    1
  9. I wàs very reticent with predictions about the full-on implosion of Russia, but by now, I'd say that I won't be surprised a bit if Your projections become true.
    1
  10.  @SupremeRTS  Ignore him. 's a Right-wing gun nut.. not worth the spit.
    1
  11. Wow.. this really triggered the dimwitted Tucker-cultists... On a side-note: A "changing of the guard" and then immediately a news blackout. I'd gather a wild guess, but me thinks it's 'auwtchie time' again for the Orcs... Maybe another s.c. "Thunder-Run"? (look it up) Then again. As I keep saying: "Predictions are hard, especially about the future" as the famous guru Yogi Berra so aptly remarked.
    1
  12. Well.. "some are more equal than others' 😋
    1
  13. As I understand it, Russia barely held-on mainly due to the massive Lend-Lease that provided food, blankets, clothing, Bell P-39 Airacobra's and whatnot. Without that constant stream of American help, they would have lost as a whole to the Nazi's, even the callous use of pure cannon-fodder in the tens of thousands, wouldn't have stopped Hitler.
    1