Comments by "SmallSpoonBrigade" (@SmallSpoonBrigade) on "We've Been Lied To All Along" video.

  1. Those meetings happen a lot, because the DoD is incredibly sloppy with how it handles its budget. I'm sure that wasn't the only time that a meeting like that happened.
    3
  2. It looked like a demolition because buildings nearly always collapse like that. It's just when explosives are used incorrectly or liquefaction tips a building over that it falls in other ways.
    2
  3.  @Mutorcsym1391  No, they didn't. We're only a couple years from being 25 years after the fact, and no evidence of that has actually surfaced. Nobody has come out as having been involved in that, or having participated in that. There have been no death bed confessions or any other acknowledgement of involvement. Nor has any evidence from other sources emerged. We just have a couple tapes like this being misinterpreted and a lack of understanding of how buildings collapse fueling the conspiracy theories. We've got more information justifying a JFK assassination conspiracy than this being something other than what it looks like. A controlled demolition of a building that size takes a lot of planning and preparation. For that kind of thing to remain secret for over 20 years without anybody talking would make it one of the most effective conspiracies ever.
    1
  4. They don't say that the WTC buildings were brought down by planes, that's what happened. The planes were seen by people crashing into the buildings and because the WTC buildings were set up to allow for large, and mostly, open floor space, if anything caused the core to fail the whole building would come down. In this case, too much of the fireproofing was destroyed by the planes to protect against the subsequent fire. That's been known for quite a few years at this point, and is completely consistent with the towers being designed to withstand a smaller plane, with less fuel, colliding with them. As for why building 7 collapsed like that, it's because that's how buildings virtually always come down. They're engineered from the beginning to collapse inward, gravity works downward and barring somebody screwing it up massively, the building always comes down like that. You'd have to have a Kobe style earthquake where the land liquefies unevenly or screw up the explosives placement to get anything else. Now whether the building was intentionally brought down or fell down due to the underground connections is another matter, but there's no way that they would have been able to rig all those explosives that quickly without anybody noticing it. Getting your hands on that much explosive material without being on a list is rather hard to begin with, but then installing it all without anybody noticing it's being done while there are a bunch of people in the building is something that does require a lot of justification. As far as I can tell, this is simply a byproduct of the chaos on the day and if you pay attention to the on the ground journalist, she doesn't refer to building 7 when she's talking. People make mistakes, and presumably everybody involved here was in shock. I don't think that anybody outside of NYC had ever heard of building 7, so it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that people were reacting to that one. More likely, there was a mix up and somebody had a script ready for when the building did collapse due to being weakened. And now, we get to spend time over 20 years later, trying to turn it into something that it's not. This is just like JFK, it was Lee Oswald and a lot of luck that resulted in the assassination being successful. I know folks don't like that because of the huge impact it had on the history of the '60s and '70s, but that's the truth, and even today, nobody has turned up conclusive proof of another option being likely. It's sad to see this channel devolving into a bunch of misinformation and conspiracy theories when there's very reasonable, and well-supported explanations.
    1