Comments by "Darlene" (@darlene2709) on "Nightly News Full Broadcast - Feb. 17th" video.

  1. 6
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. "Claim That US Blew up Nord Stream Pipelines Relies on Anonymous Source. Seymour Hersh presents factual background material, but his case for conspiracy is held together by a seemingly omnipotent anonymous source. This story, when deconstructed, is merely a pile of purported second-hand information allegedly collected by someone connected in some unknown way to deliberations of a highly secret, multi-agency task force. Such a story falls prey to the same criticisms of other more recent work published by Hersh, which has relied on similarly questionable anonymous sources. If the U.S. did conspire to destroy the Nord Stream pipeline, Hersh's reporting has not proved that case. Hersh has, instead, made a very successful blog post that essentially transcribes a compelling story someone unknown to the general public told him." Reuters  "Biden Did Not Threaten to Sabotage Nord Stream Pipelines as Russian Disinfo Claims. For its part, Russia cast suspicion on the United States. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova pointed at U.S. President Joe Biden, citing a statement he made on February 7. On Telegram, Zakharova wrote: U.S. President Joe Biden must answer whether the United States acted on its threat on September 25 and 26, 2022, when an incident occurred on three branches of Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, preliminarily qualified as pipeline ruptures, possibly as a result of explosions.” Problem is, that puts Biden’s words, spoken at a news conference before Russia attacked Ukraine, in a false context. But it was weeks before then that Biden, at the White House with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, was asked if Germany would “pull the plug” on Nord Stream 2 “if Russia invades Ukraine.” In that event, Biden said, “There will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.” Scholz added, “[W]e have intensively prepared everything to be ready with the necessary sanctions if there is a military aggression against Ukraine.” So, the context was about whether Germany and the U.S. would block the project to bring economic pressure to bear on Russia, which prior to the war provided half of Germany’s natural gas (and 40 percent of Europe’s, much of it transiting Ukraine). Pulling the plug is entirely different from blowing things up." Polygraph
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. "Marjorie Taylor Greene compares Biden to FDR, LBJ. Thanks for the free campaign ad! The predominantly ludicrous lawmaker from Georgia did Biden an unexpected – and surely unplanned – solid this weekend in a speech at the conservative Turning Point Action conference in Florida, telling Republicans the Democratic president is fiendishly attempting to make people’s lives better. She compared Biden’s "Build Back Better" plan to President Lyndon B. Johnson’s "Great Society," an array of programs from the mid-1960s aimed at combating poverty in America. Those programs included Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps, along with the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As Greene talked about President Johnson, she said, dismissively: “His BIG socialist programs were the Great Society ... big government programs to address education, medical care, urban problems, rural poverty, transportation, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and welfare.” Greene continued making the case for Biden’s reelection: “Now LBJ had the Great Society, but Joe Biden had Build Back Better, and he still is working on it, the largest public investment in social infrastructure and environmental programs that is actually finishing what FDR started, that LBJ expanded on, and Joe Biden is attempting to complete.”  As if connecting Biden to popular social programs wasn’t enough, Greene took the high praise a step further by looping in President Franklin D. Roosevelt, one of the most popular presidents in American history. Greene’s attempt to raise Biden’s profile to that of FDR and the president who launched a war on poverty and created Medicare was clearly appreciated. On Monday morning, the official White House Twitter account retweeted the video of Greene's speech, adding: "Caught us. President Biden is working to make life easier for hardworking families." USA Today
    1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. There have been several unverified claims of Ukrainian corruption. "Shortchanged: Seymour Hersh's Claim Zelenskyy Embezzled $400M in US Aid Lacks Evidence. The entirety of the claim apparently comes from what Hersh describes as "one knowledgeable American intelligence official." Hersh's career of late has been controversial and widely panned by journalists for promoting conspiratorial claims that hinge on dubious anonymous sources or speculation. His later work is often sympathetic to Russian talking points, and his work is widely covered there.  Hersh's present claim fits plainly within that genre. Characteristically, it has been promoted by Russian media. Readers of Hersh's reporting could be forgiven if, by the end of the story, they forgot that it was allegedly an expose on Ukrainian embezzlement. Despite being the primary assertion of the story, only two paragraphs are dedicated to the claim. Hersh hides this clear lack of supporting evidence under a torrential onslaught of superfluous information.  As in his fundamentally flawed investigation claiming U.S. involvement in the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, his present claim is bolstered by references to actual events and tinted with conspiracy, thanks to the testimony of anonymous intelligence sources (or potentially a sole source) claiming to have non-public insight into those events.  Fundamentally, the actual news presented in his story is that someone knowledgeable supposedly told Hersh that Zelenksyy and his "entourage" have been embezzling U.S. funds by purchasing discounted Russian oil and pocketing the difference. It's an incendiary claim for which no actual evidence is proffered.
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. "Zelensky was elected for a five-year term in March 2019, with presidential elections originally scheduled for March 2024. Ukraine was due to hold a parliamentary election in October. Zelensky declared martial law on February 24, 2022, the day Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine's constitution mandates that elections cannot go ahead until any declaration of martial law is lifted, which is unlikely to happen soon. Ukrainian law states that elections for the presidential office of Ukraine, Ukraine's parliamentary body the Verkhovna Rada, the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and local self-government bodies, are prohibited under martial law. Whether an election could happen is theoretical and the Ukrainian government could explore if the rules on elections during martial law could change. A few days ahead of Zelensky's announcement on Monday, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said the Ukrainian president was weighing the pros and cons of a presidential vote in spring 2024. "We are not closing this page. The president of Ukraine is considering and weighing the different pros and cons," he said during an online appearance at the World Policy Conference in the United Arab Emirates on November 3. There would be any number of challenges in trying to hold an election. As well as the difficulties of ensuring a fair election across the country, particularly with regions in the east of the country under Russian control, millions of displaced Ukrainians may be unable to vote or be able to access tools to ensure their vote is counted." Newsweek
    1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. There have been several unverified claims of Ukrainian corruption. "Shortchanged: Seymour Hersh's Claim Zelenskyy Embezzled $400M in US Aid Lacks Evidence. The entirety of the claim apparently comes from what Hersh describes as "one knowledgeable American intelligence official." Hersh's career of late has been controversial and widely panned by journalists for promoting conspiratorial claims that hinge on dubious anonymous sources or speculation. His later work is often sympathetic to Russian talking points, and his work is widely covered there.  Hersh's present claim fits plainly within that genre. Characteristically, it has been promoted by Russian media. Readers of Hersh's reporting could be forgiven if, by the end of the story, they forgot that it was allegedly an expose on Ukrainian embezzlement. Despite being the primary assertion of the story, only two paragraphs are dedicated to the claim. Hersh hides this clear lack of supporting evidence under a torrential onslaught of superfluous information.  As in his fundamentally flawed investigation claiming U.S. involvement in the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, his present claim is bolstered by references to actual events and tinted with conspiracy, thanks to the testimony of anonymous intelligence sources (or potentially a sole source) claiming to have non-public insight into those events.  Fundamentally, the actual news presented in his story is that someone knowledgeable supposedly told Hersh that Zelenksyy and his "entourage" have been embezzling U.S. funds by purchasing discounted Russian oil and pocketing the difference. It's an incendiary claim for which no actual evidence is proffered.
    1