Comments by "Darlene" (@darlene2709) on "Nightly News Full Broadcast - June 4" video.

  1. What's the fake news and exactly how do you know that?
    3
  2. What's the propaganda and how do you know that?
    3
  3. What's the propaganda and how do you know that?
    3
  4. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    2
  5. What's the fake news and how do you know that?
    2
  6.  @burtminshew4812  That's not an answer.
    2
  7. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  8. Trump should be charged with espionage. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  9. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  10. There is a big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  11. What are the lies and how do you know that?
    1
  12. Please elaborate with evidence.
    1
  13. "Trump has claimed that, "I don't make money from China," Forbes estimates that at least $5.4 million has flowed into the pockets of the Trump Organization from the Chinese-owned bank as part of a lease agreement that was signed before Trump took office." Newsweek
    1
  14. What's the Biden failure?
    1
  15. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  16. "The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind,” Trump said. “I came up with a vaccine — with three vaccines — all are very, very good … in less than nine months. It was supposed to take five to 12 years.” “And if you take the vaccine, you’re protected," Trump went on. "The results of the vaccine are very good. And if you do get it, it’s a very minor form. People aren’t dying when they take their vaccine. The vaccine worked, but some people aren’t taking it,” he said. “The ones that get very sick and go to the hospital are the ones who don’t take their vaccine.”
    1
  17. Here's an update. "Fact Check: Is Jamie Foxx Partially Blind and Paralyzed from COVID-19 Vaccine? Viral claims say that Jamie Foxx, well-known for starring in Django Unchained, was partially paralyzed and blind after having the COVID-19 vaccine. The claims were made by journalist A.P Benza, who said that Foxx had suffered from a blood clot in his brain due to the vaccine. However, this has not been confirmed, and it is unclear exactly what happened to Foxx. If the COVID-19 vaccine were responsible for Foxx’s medical emergency, he would have shown signs within hours or days of receiving it. It is, therefore, unlikely that he suffered from vaccine side effects because he received his vaccine doses almost two years ago. Claims of sudden death or injury due to COVID-19 vaccine have so far been false in every instance. If Foxx were vaccinated, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines he received are not linked to blood clots. Even if he were vaccinated with the Janssen vaccine, it would be easy to diagnose the problem with both blood clots and low platelet counts that can cause bleeding. Benza claimed that Foxx was pressured into getting the vaccine. However, there is no evidence for this claim, and neither Foxx nor his family has openly discussed his vaccination status. Many of those who suffered sudden deaths or injuries were actually unvaccinated. In summary, claims that Jamie Foxx is partially blind and paralyzed due to the COVID-19 vaccine are inaccurate and unsubstantiated. It is still unknown what caused his medical emergency." LA Times
    1
  18. "Claim That US Blew up Nord Stream Pipelines Relies on Anonymous Source. Seymour Hersh presents factual background material, but his case for conspiracy is held together by a seemingly omnipotent anonymous source. This story, when deconstructed, is merely a pile of purported second-hand information allegedly collected by someone connected in some unknown way to deliberations of a highly secret, multi-agency task force. Such a story falls prey to the same criticisms of other more recent work published by Hersh, which has relied on similarly questionable anonymous sources. If the U.S. did conspire to destroy the Nord Stream pipeline, Hersh's reporting has not proved that case. Hersh has, instead, made a very successful blog post that essentially transcribes a compelling story someone unknown to the general public told him." Reuters "Biden Did Not Threaten to Sabotage Nord Stream Pipelines as Russian Disinfo Claims. For its part, Russia cast suspicion on the United States. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova pointed at U.S. President Joe Biden, citing a statement he made on February 7. On Telegram, Zakharova wrote: U.S. President Joe Biden must answer whether the United States acted on its threat on September 25 and 26, 2022, when an incident occurred on three branches of Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, preliminarily qualified as pipeline ruptures, possibly as a result of explosions.” Problem is, that puts Biden’s words, spoken at a news conference before Russia attacked Ukraine, in a false context. But it was weeks before then that Biden, at the White House with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, was asked if Germany would “pull the plug” on Nord Stream 2 “if Russia invades Ukraine.” In that event, Biden said, “There will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.” Scholz added, “[W]e have intensively prepared everything to be ready with the necessary sanctions if there is a military aggression against Ukraine.” So, the context was about whether Germany and the U.S. would block the project to bring economic pressure to bear on Russia, which prior to the war provided half of Germany’s natural gas (and 40 percent of Europe’s, much of it transiting Ukraine). Pulling the plug is entirely different from blowing things up." Polygraph
    1
  19. Presidents don't have a magic declassification wand. There is a process, which Trump clearly didn't follow. The classification status and executive privilege are both irrelevant. Trump is not allowed to take the recipes from the Whitehouse chef never mind classified documents. "Former Presidents Are Not Allowed to Take Home Official Records. The National Archives recovered 15 boxes of materials from former President Donald Trump’s time in office. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, claimed that the law allowed Trump to “take documents when he left the White House.” But a former president isn’t allowed to take possession of official records, which Trump has said these are." NPR "The procedure is far more formal,” said Immerman, who is now a historian at Temple University. “Documents must be declassified page by page; in fact, if TS/SCI [Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information] line by line. The document then is marked declassified (often sanitized) by the authorizing agent along with the date. Consequently, former President Trump’s claim is to me implausible.” USA Today
    1
  20. There is a big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  21. Please elaborate with evidence.
    1
  22. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  23. "Fox News anchor Brett Baier refuted suggestions promoted by Donald Trump and a fellow Fox News personality that former President Barack Obama had mishandled 33 million documents, including classified materials. Baier on Friday rejected the comparison during a Fox News segment, saying that while Obama had relocated the documents, that action had followed the legal process. In Trump's case, the legal process does not appear to have been followed, although the former president and his attorneys contend he declassified the materials before leaving the White House." Newsweek
    1
  24.  @richardsaga7559  That may be true but Trump is a clear and present danger.
    1
  25. What is the fake news and exactly how do you know that?
    1
  26.  @cordiallimousine  That is the response I was expecting.
    1
  27. Trump confessed to stealing the documents. He very kindly supplied the evidence with the help of his crack legal team. "The motion submitted on Monday by the former president’s lawyers argued that a court should appoint a so-called special master to separate out and determine what materials the justice department can review as evidence due to privilege issues. “The documents seized at Mar-a-Lago … were created during his term as President. Accordingly, the documents are presumptively privileged until proven otherwise,” the filing said. “Only an evaluation by a neutral reviewer, a Special Master, can secure the sanctity of these privileged materials.” But the argument from Trump that the documents are subject to executive privilege protections suggests those documents are official records – which he is not authorized to keep and should have turned over to the National Archives at the end of the administration. The motion, in that regard, appeared to concede that Trump violated one of the criminal statutes listed on the warrant used by the FBI to search the former president’s Mar-a-Lago resort – 18 USC 2071 – concerning the unlawful removal of government records." USA Today
    1
  28. What is the propaganda and how do you know that?
    1
  29. The hijackers of the four planes switched off the transponders or changed their codes upon taking control, making it difficult to track them on radar.
    1
  30. The hijackers of the four planes switched off the transponders or changed their codes upon taking control, making it difficult to track them on radar.
    1
  31. "President Donald Trump has accused Hunter Biden, without evidence, of making millions of dollars in a “payoff” from China, after accompanying his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on a 2013 diplomatic trip to Beijing. The claim involves a cross-border private equity fund involving some state-owned financial companies in China. Biden served on the management company’s board while his father was vice president, but his attorney says that was an unpaid position, that he did not create the company and has not yet received any money, let alone millions. The attorney says Hunter Biden only acquired a minority stake in the investment management company after his father left office. We have found no evidence to contradict that, and Trump hasn’t provided any. We also found no evidence that Joe Biden used his position as vice president to enrich his son." PolitiFact
    1
  32. "Trump has claimed that, "I don't make money from China," Forbes estimates that at least $5.4 million has flowed into the pockets of the Trump Organization from the Chinese-owned bank as part of a lease agreement that was signed before Trump took office." Newsweek
    1
  33. "There is no evidence Joe Biden has received large sums of money from China or has otherwise gained wealth as a result of his son's business dealings abroad. Trump has previously made the "billion-five" accusation against Hunter Biden. While a conservative author has used this figure, it has not been proven. A lawyer for Hunter Biden, George Mesires, says the investment company in which Hunter Biden has an equity stake was capitalized with a total of about $4.2 million at today's exchange rates, "not $1.5 billion." Even this investment was not a direct payment to Hunter Biden; Hunter Biden holds a 10% stake in the firm, Mesires says, and has not made a profit to date." Reuters
    1
  34. There is a big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  35. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  36. Trump's company was convicted of stealing taxpayer money.
    1
  37. What does this new cancer treatment have to do with the Covid-19 vaccines?
    1
  38. Trump's company was convicted of stealing taxpayer money.
    1
  39. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  40. "Social media was abuzz about a 25 second video of President Donald Trump descending a ramp after he gave a speech at the West Point Commencement. He didn’t exactly go down the ramp Gangnam style. Instead, he walked down the ramp fairly carefully. That led to lots of speculation about Trump’s health on social media, because that’s what the Twittersphere, the Facebook-o-sphere, and other social media spheres do. President Trump is flirting with his own version of Water-gate -- again. For the second time in a few months, Trump struggled to lift a glass of water during his contentious interview with Lesley Stahl. Trump found himself at the center of another umbrella-related snafu on Saturday, as he boarded Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in D.C. In videos documenting the moment, Trump, 72, can be seen holding the device over his head while making his way up the stairs to the aircraft. However, as he proceeded to enter the plane, he lowered the still-opened umbrella — which was wider than the aircraft door — to the ground. After he appeared to drag it along the ground for a few moments, instead of closing the umbrella, he simply released the handle, leaving it to wobble on the ground." People
    1
  41. Trump's company was convicted of stealing taxpayer money.
    1
  42. What's the propaganda and how do you know that?
    1
  43. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  44. Trump has claimed that, "I don't make money from China," Forbes estimates that at least $5.4 million has flowed into the pockets of the Trump Organization from the Chinese-owned bank as part of a lease agreement that was signed before Trump took office." Newsweek
    1
  45. You should apply the same logic to the odds of an adverse vaccine reaction vs. the odds of dying from COVID-19 when arguing against vaccination. "COVID-19 symptoms can sometimes persist for months. The virus can damage the lungs, heart and brain, which increases the risk of long-term health problems. The risk of developing rare blood clots is eight to 10 times higher in people with Covid 19 than in those who have been vaccinated." Mayo Clinic
    1
  46. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  47. "President Donald Trump has accused Hunter Biden, without evidence, of making millions of dollars in a “payoff” from China, after accompanying his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on a 2013 diplomatic trip to Beijing. The claim involves a cross-border private equity fund involving some state-owned financial companies in China. Biden served on the management company’s board while his father was vice president, but his attorney says that was an unpaid position, that he did not create the company and has not yet received any money, let alone millions. The attorney says Hunter Biden only acquired a minority stake in the investment management company after his father left office. We have found no evidence to contradict that, and Trump hasn’t provided any. We also found no evidence that Joe Biden used his position as vice president to enrich his son." PolitiFact
    1
  48. There is a big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  49. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  50. Trump confessed to stealing the documents. He very kindly supplied the evidence with the help of his crack legal team. "The motion submitted on Monday by the former president’s lawyers argued that a court should appoint a so-called special master to separate out and determine what materials the justice department can review as evidence due to privilege issues. “The documents seized at Mar-a-Lago … were created during his term as President. Accordingly, the documents are presumptively privileged until proven otherwise,” the filing said. “Only an evaluation by a neutral reviewer, a Special Master, can secure the sanctity of these privileged materials.” But the argument from Trump that the documents are subject to executive privilege protections suggests those documents are official records – which he is not authorized to keep and should have turned over to the National Archives at the end of the administration. The motion, in that regard, appeared to concede that Trump violated one of the criminal statutes listed on the warrant used by the FBI to search the former president’s Mar-a-Lago resort – 18 USC 2071 – concerning the unlawful removal of government records." USA Today
    1
  51. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  52. "Donald Trump has accused Hunter Biden, without any evidence, of making millions of dollars in a “payoff” from China, after accompanying his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on a 2013 diplomatic trip to Beijing. The claim involves a cross-border private equity fund involving some state-owned financial companies in China. Biden served on the management company’s board while his father was vice president, but his attorney says that was an unpaid position, that he did not create the company and has not yet received any money, let alone millions. The attorney says Hunter Biden only acquired a minority stake in the investment management company after his father left office. We have found no evidence to contradict that, and Trump hasn’t provided any. We also found no evidence that Joe Biden used his position as vice president to enrich his son." PolitiFact
    1
  53. Communism is the economic system where the government owns the means of production.
    1
  54. While in the presidency, Trump billed government departments for millions of dollars for use of his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida and other hotel properties. Fox News told its gullible audience one thing publicly about the 2020 election while privately knowing that the exact opposite was true. How can you respect an organization that obviously doesn't respect you? Trump's "charitable" works include the following: $20,000 from his foundation was used by to buy a portrait of himself to give to his wife Melania. More than a quarter of a million dollars from his charitable foundation was spent to cover legal fees incurred in lawsuits relating to his profitable businesses. The largest gift from the foundation, of $264,631, was used to repair a fountain on the grounds of the New York Plaza hotel, which Trump owned at the time.
    1
  55. Please elaborate with evidence.
    1
  56. There is a very big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  57. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  58. Trump should be charged with espionage.
    1
  59.  @DXC1997  Territorially, there are seven claimants to the South China Sea: China, Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam.
    1
  60. There is one big difference between the cases. Trump was served a warrant after he refused to turn over the documents. Biden's lawyers found the documents and immediately turned them over.
    1
  61. What exactly is the propaganda and how do you know that?
    1
  62. Presidents don't have a magic declassification wand. There is a process, which Trump clearly didn't follow. The classification status and executive privilege are both irrelevant. Trump is not allowed to take the recipes from the Whitehouse chef never mind classified documents. "Former Presidents Are Not Allowed to Take Home Official Records. The National Archives recovered 15 boxes of materials from former President Donald Trump’s time in office. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, claimed that the law allowed Trump to “take documents when he left the White House.” But a former president isn’t allowed to take possession of official records, which Trump has said these are." NPR "The procedure is far more formal,” said Immerman, who is now a historian at Temple University. “Documents must be declassified page by page; in fact, if TS/SCI [Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information] line by line. The document then is marked declassified (often sanitized) by the authorizing agent along with the date. Consequently, former President Trump’s claim is to me implausible.” USA Today
    1