Comments by "Darlene" (@darlene2709) on "What employees need to know before returning to the office" video.

Not even remotely true.
1
@derekwoodford9955 Yes. If you are posting a comment, it's misinformation.
1
@derekwoodford9955 Search completed as you suggested. "Fact Check-Western Australian legislation uses ‘poison’ as a catch-all legal term; it is not implying something sinister. Reuters Fact Check Suggestions on social media that Western Australia has slyly admitted to harming its citizens by classifying COVID-19 vaccines as “poison” reveals a misunderstanding of legal language. The definition of “poison” in legislation differs from its day-to-day meaning. One video, viewed 25,000 times, features a narrator reading through the legislative instrument that gives Western Australia the legal authority to begin administering COVID-19 vaccines. This instrument is called: “Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE – Australian Defence Force] (No.2) 2021”. "Why are they called the so-called vaccine a poison?” the narrator asks. “That’s how far this tyranny goes; they can actually give you poison […] So even if they kill somebody they can go, ‘Well, I told you it was a poison.’ What the heck is wrong with people? Medical tyranny. It’s disgusting.” The narrator also links the word “poison” to its definition as found in his Google search: “A substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed” While the video’s narrator was correct in reading the ordinary meaning of “poison”, he appears to misunderstand that its definition in Australian legalese is different. VERDICT. Missing context. Western Australian legalese uses the word “poison” as a term to describe all substances that interact with physiological functions of the body. It does not suggest vaccines are dangerous."
1
No sane person takes medical advice from the YouTube experts.
1