Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Bernie Sanders Fans Suffer an Acute Persecution Complex" video.

@TiberianFiend He doesn't understand economics. He understands branding. Not economics. Steel is doing good. Lots of burger jobs and dead-end nothing jobs. This is Trumponomics.
2
@Chud_Bud_Supreme And you people are morons. Can ya blame me? All you people do is: willy-nilly. Everything hinges on [for you people] the notions you uphold as true, even if they aren't factual, an even if they mere confusions and conflations of actual things in their actual form and content. It's insufferable, and if anyone ever has something to say about it, and actually makes a point of contention that is self-evident, no one can even hope to try and attack such a position with actual reasoning, because this is the lackadaisical "truth" which is encompassed as "fact" within political paradigms. In other words, you're just as bad as Linker-Fachismus. Just a bit different. But just as willing to tinker with the truth to serve the ends of...ew...politicians and banksters.
2
@namenameson9065 No, you're just an idiot. It wasn't a typo. Plus, here's a clue for you morons... Quote people using bolding -- So we can avoid having to slog thru Youtube comments and their slow-loading.
2
@namenameson9065 No, that isn't how shit works, dummy. I just revealed how all of you are incapable of understanding any counterpoint to the axiomatic of capitalism, which is why, actually, it's good that Marxism exists...even if I don't agree with their entire position...because you "types" of "people" [robot] can't help but literally confuse every single piece of jargon and comprehension of just...about everything...and if Marx hadn't have leveled a counterposition against cronies, you would all have been totally brainwashed and not had a clue who actually owns you,...even more so than you already lack that particular clew. But alas, you didn't make an argument. Defenestrate yourself.
2
@Alex_Fahey Thank God, I had an economics teacher worth a damn. He had a clear bias towards the Austrian model and one class would be enough to make any commie reconsider his philosophy/economic theory. Commie? no...only if you are a brainless idiot do you actually think that...and this doesn't even count as "thinking", this is "non-thinking". Keysianism is capitalistic, not communistic, you absolute...just defenestrate...all you people would make the world a better place if your idiocy wasn't so virulent. And the Austrian model is the model developed out of classical economics, you...this is way you people, collectively, are morons.
2
@jeppep95 And we're going to see more future austerity because of fuckwits who can't fathom what the difference between an aggregate is by world-stage, by country, or by "class". They refuse to acknowledge this, cause "le Marxism" [which is something they can't understand as a historical precedence]...they also confuse "it" with Utopian Socialism, which was denounced by Marx [just some food for thought].
2
@namenameson9065 Supply and demand are simple laws of nature. The more of something the is, the less demand there is, then the less value it has. This is just how things work. You can't argue against this principle. Communism will not save you from supply and demand How is anything he is saying "communism"? You are such a moron, and you people, you viruses, are infecting people with the most tragically stupid misunderstandings of economics and politics, that can even be imagined. The more of something there is the demand there is? right...and so this is what you see: people's wages becoming nary enough to support people's conflicted ideas of "managing wealth", and then people like you jut out, like sore thumbs, wanting things to be fixed and not having a clue how to fix it or what is even concurrently happening on a day to day basis with your wealth, and then you'll say: but my taxes...it's the leftists taking it! -- No...it's just the way you like things to run. Sorry. Socialism, Capitalism...all the same, by these markers...they are different in other ways, though. Socialism is "self-managed". Capitalism is not.
2
@namenameson9065 All your funny-money printing makes the private central bankers very rich. That's why they love high government spending so much! And we pay for it all! No, I don't want to pay for anymore of other peoples loan debt! Just defenestrate...seriously...so you are claiming to be a capitalist, and don't understand HOW CAPITALISM OPERATES. It's always global, because the money goes everywhere, and can be siphoned everywhere, too. Which is the case, right now. You like central banking if you like capitalism. If you like self-managed economies, then socialism is what you truly endorse. I'm many of you mongs don't understand the facts, here. But that's not anyone's problems but...well, it's everyone's problem, because you people are run amok.
2
@namenameson9065 And you are still using Keynesianism because you are Americans and you are the hegemon and you are capitalists and you are global. So it will continue and all your leveling of accusations won't CHANGE anything, and you'll just continue to eat your words.
2
Capitalism operates by exploit. Everyone knows that. Literally, if you don't know that...you should just defenestrate, instead of opening your yippy mouth.
2
Yes, and libertarians don't have such things like a persecution complex, that's why Styx makes 10 billions videos daily trying to sway people.
1
@kevinpratt5436 Yet, this is what you will use because capital is global and that isn't changing any time soon. So your classical economics will have to sit in the silent corner and suffer.
1
@deplorable_bitter_clinger7482 No, you.
1
@OriginalBongoliath The same that you're continuing to use because of global capital.
1
@Rose Quartz Shut your face, you only are presuming everything and that's what you people do...so shut up
1
@namenameson9065 That means ending the commie crap that makes these crony monopolies possible in the first place. More nonsense.
1
@deplorable_bitter_clinger7482 You are literally misreading him. He said that what he learned in collage was bullshit and "globalist propaganda" and didn't apply to the real world. He's an idiot who probably doesn't understand the difference between doing business, and maintaining globalized capital.
1
@Chud_Bud_Supreme No.
1
Shut up, you idiot. You don't know anything. The guy who understands something here is jeppep.
1
@Alex_Fahey You are. You all are idiots. Instead of opposing anything with rationality, logic, reasoning, evidence, arguments...you're all just making these specious anecdotal claims [bullshit], and specious attempts to call "Keysianism" "Communism" -- Now you lumped yourself in with this mass of retarded crap...sorry. But you sound about as idiotic as the rest of them.
1
@Alex_Fahey You were interjecting into the convo people were [idiotically] having about "commie Keynsianism" [?] with the rest of the retards, and you gave the class some stupid anecdote about your professor, and how he would have "changed the commies mind" [the non-existent commie, you robotic morons insist is in this convo].
1
You're full of shit, Coconut. You couldn't comprehend how economics works, you are too much of a fool. There is more than one type of economic background...there is business economics, and then solid-state economics, etc. Many things go into maintaining a modern state...more than just "I do business guys". So shut your face up. Yippy.
1
@Alex_Fahey You are unable to make a point. Please try and make one. You interjected yourself into the convo, which was about Keynsianism being "communistic" [a falsehood]...thence comes your rhetoric about "indoctrination, college professors, and the education world", from out of the conversation that you inserted yourself into as interlocutor [and I, as well.] It was already connected to the notion of an "intervention", via the State-bodies control over the institutions of "college professors and education" [in a free country, I might add], because those bodies are under an economic system that we are all debating about. So either you are inserting yourself in the wrong debate, or you are confusing yourself, and confusing the debate for something that it's not. So you should make a point.
1
@Alex_Fahey I don't want you to argue about Keynes. I want you to argue why you think "communists" have anything to do with why capitalist systems of governance are leading to the social problems you seek to rectify. Maybe try doing that, instead of running around like a headless chicken. None of this has to do with the lovely Bob. Nothing. No one is even mentioning him, but you.
1