Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "How to Survive Kamala Harris's "Tax Armageddon"" video.

  1. You need to be high 7-8 figures - boutique services NEVER come cheap, especially when they're good. Most boutique services are around $25,000 per appointment with other fees for each thing they need to do and other costs. That's why they always introduce themselves as being for '7-8 figure entrepreneurs'.
    5
  2. I'd love to see some mega-rich person take the govt of an English-speaking "western" country to court and have courts rule 'retro-active' applicable laws as illegal. I find it absurd that anyone tolerates such laws as they are effectively illegal laws. Why? Because if a law can be applied retro-actively then why do we have any laws. Say the highway has a speed limit of 140km/h (maybe its in Europe) but a month later gets changed to 100km/h and the govt go around booking everyone that drove on the highway for exceeding the speed limit by 40km/h because the law that changed the speed limit was applied retro-actively. What crime did those people commit? None - they followed the laws. It doesn't matter that its a tax, that's the govt extorting you because you complied with the laws at the time, then they say "oh we just passed a new tax but we're applying it from 2yrs ago, so you broke the law by failing to pay the correct taxes". Then your guilty of tax evasion and facing a felony. If following the law makes you a criminal then that is an illegal law. They should only be allowed to enforce new laws from the date they become law, this retro-active BS needs to end. All of CANZUK & CUNA are trying this BS because the masses are too compliant that they don't care, even when the issues are explained to them.
    2
  3. And that is why scum like you will always live like trash and be ruled by hate and violence. The rich create the jobs, and give everyone a chance at a future; no jobs = no future. The rich are the reason you can go to a bank and borrow money - if the rich leave with their money the banks legally have to reduce their lending due to reduced liquidity / reserve. That's why countries try to entice the rich to stay. How about you get off your ass and actually work, save money, invest, get gouged by the taxes you shout for, then realize why you're spouting utter BS. Remember when scum such as yourself say 'tax the rich' you mean the person who's middle-class and being taxed the most, you NEVER mean the actual rich because you know they include the politicians and they'll never tax themselves. What is 'fair share'? Clearly its not 70% of their income, most of CANZUK & CUNA when you add up all the taxes (including levies) that have to be paid to the govt, you quickly end up at around 70% tax (income tax + CGT + levies + council rates/property tax + Mandatory Super/401k + [whatever else they add]). Why did I leave 'Mandatory Super/401k' in there? Because if it wasn't mandatory you'd receive it as part of your wage, also because when you do get to use it, they tax it (in most of CANZUK & CUNA) as Income, even though you already paid Income tax on it when you earned it. The people who don't pay their 'fair share' are the ones receiving the welfare. What's needed are laws that force the ones who receive welfare to pay back every cent they receive no matter what it takes. Why should they be allowed to be freeloaders and steal from people who worked hard? They shouldn't but the demented current system lets them. I'd love to see you say the same BS if you were a rich person - you sure as hell wouldn't and you'd understand why.
    1