Comments by "Granny Annie" (@grannyannie2948) on "Independent candidate to challenge AEC rule" video.

And now the trials have been released we see the 95 have reduced mortality compared to the five. Imagine reducing your life expectancy just to supposedly have less symptoms from something that was never dangerous to healthy people under sixty.
4
Melody Melody How were they to know they would test positive before the election?
4
@Lee-ur7ur I've just recovered from covid, I'm not young, I am an asthmatic, and unvaxed, and I was only sick for a few days, as is usual for me with change of season. Watermelons is a good book on the climate scam.
2
@ginaspeciale9086 Decades ago I saw research where the descendants of people who had survived bubonic plague in previous history had resistance to HIV virus. Scientists have been saying that the that the spiked protein reduces natural immunity. The human trials showed a slight protection from covid, which has since proven to be of short duration, but at the cost of an overall increase in mortality.
1
@SammySlamma92 I replied in detail. Direct me to where in the Pfizer documents this is disproven. The field of overall mortality of drugs and vax has been respected for over fifty years. I know it's hard to accept that we were right to wait for the science instead of believing government and media. A small protection from covid compared to a shorter lifespan may be attractive to some people.
1