Comments by "silat13" (@silat13) on "A "Global Warming Skeptic" Calls In To Make His Case" video.

  1. E. Howard Hunt says the guy who was involved in Watergate.
    13
  2. Global Warming Skeptic And your points are WRONG> 1. There is a consensus no matter how you spin it. 2. There is consensus about humans being responsible for the runaway warming of the earth.
    10
  3. Global Warming Skeptic LOL you are a true son of David K0CH. Your denial and spin is supreme.
    7
  4. kathy kelly You use Watts? HAHA Watts is was a meterologist. Not a scientist. A known quack. That is all you idiots have.
    5
  5. Andre Idalgo Thanks:) I just read his comments.  Ayn L Randian freeDUMB market bullshit.
    5
  6. Global Warming Skeptic you have been told before. You just have a brain that does not accept any fact that does not fit your deluded world view. 1. NASA believes it 2. Defense Dept believes it The list goes on and on. And yes it is 97% of climate scientists. Dont even bother lying again about the %. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
    4
  7. Global Warming Skeptic LOL you are aware that K0CH gives money to PBS in order to control them? Like when he blackmailed them into not showing a show about him? You are aware that he funds denial of climate change caused by humans? You are aware the he funds only science that affects him. Like his funding of prostate cancer research because he or his brother had it?  His very small donations considering his worth is meaningless to this discussion of your inability to understand simple concepts.
    4
  8. Marcos Perez there is so much wrong with the critical thinking abilities of this K0CH puppet.
    3
  9. Global Warming Skeptic by the way you remember when you claimed that NASA spent 22 billion on climate change studies? Please do not lie and deny you said it. It is in your laughable phone call to Seder. Here is the proof that you are a liar: May 19, 2015 House Republicans unveiled the details of a spending bill on Tuesday that would cut the amount of money NASA spends on earth science and climate-change research.  The push arrives on the heels of a concerted effort by congressional Republicans, including Sen. Ted Cruz, a 2016 presidential hopeful, to steer NASA away from the study of climate change and towards space exploration. It takes place against the backdrop a broader GOP effort to sink President Obama's ambitious agenda to tackle rising greenhouse gases and stave off the worst impacts of global warming. The House Appropriations Committee is expected to pass the bill Wednesday. NASA's earth-science program oversees a wide array of research that scientists say is critical to understanding climate change. It includes initiatives to study rising sea levels, melting Arctic ice, and the ways human activity is impacting the planet. The spending bill currently sets aside $1.68 billion for NASA to spend on earth science. That's a cut from the $1.77 billion the agency currently spends on the program. (It's also less than the $1.95 billion requested by President Obama for 2016.) For space exploration, the spending bill doles out $4.76 billion, an increase from the current level of $4.36 billion and also above $4.5 billion that Obama requested for next year. Sen. Barbara Mikulski, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, promised a fight on Monday over the proposed cuts. "Climate change is damaging MD's shores and the Chesapeake Bay, costing billions billions in tourism and causing farmers heavy losses," the senator from Maryland tweeted, adding: "That's why I'm fighting to put funds in the fed checkbook for NASA's Earth Science program and climate research at NOAA and NSF." Now do your K0CHspin and explain your lie.
    3
  10. E. Howard Hunt I hate dating myself:)
    2
  11. Global Warming Skeptic Slight error? LOL Ok spinboi.
    2
  12. Global Warming Skeptic yes it took away from your inane and factless points. You came across as an uninformed smart dumb person in your discussion with Mr. Seder. You have had time to post the link to your assertion of 22 billion. You have still not explained the breakdown of that figure.
    2
  13. Global Warming Skeptic finally. Was that so hard for you? But again you did not make any point. So 21 billion is spent on numerous items pertaining to energy, conservation, tax breaks etc? You are against that? Oh yeah, I forgot. You are against government period. You believe that the oligarchs will always do the reich thing.
    2
  14. Andre Idalgo can you provide a link to this morons bragging?
    2
  15. We are doomed. These looney reichwing bagger taliban callers sound exactly like the clowns of the K0CH Party that are running for president.
    1
  16. Global Warming Skeptic oh shut the fuck up. Do you get off on embarrassing yourself?
    1
  17. Global Warming Skeptic LOL you are truly an imbecile.
    1