Youtube comments of PeterC (@peterc4082).

  1. 166
  2. 98
  3. 78
  4. 65
  5. 49
  6. 46
  7. 36
  8. 35
  9. 30
  10. 30
  11. 29
  12. 28
  13. 28
  14. 26
  15. 24
  16. 22
  17. 22
  18. 19
  19. 18
  20. 18
  21. 18
  22. 16
  23. 16
  24. 16
  25. 15
  26. 14
  27. 14
  28. 13
  29. 13
  30. 13
  31. 12
  32. 12
  33. 12
  34. 12
  35. 12
  36. 12
  37. 12
  38. 11
  39. 11
  40. 11
  41. 11
  42. 11
  43. 11
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 10
  47. 10
  48. 10
  49. 10
  50. 10
  51. 10
  52. 10
  53. 10
  54. 9
  55. 9
  56. 9
  57. 9
  58. 9
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. 9
  63. 8
  64. 8
  65. 8
  66. 8
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 8
  73. 8
  74. 8
  75. 8
  76. 8
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 7
  85. 7
  86. 7
  87. 7
  88.  @dorinpopa6962  Some people liked the USSR because of several reasons. 1. Nostalgia. They were younger. Things were rosier back then. 2. They were party members. Some were privileged. Same happened in Poland where PZPR people were very fond of the old communist system. 3. They came from WW2 and later Stalinist purges. Things looked up after those ended, comparitively speaking. Prior to that were the 20s and 30s which were just as bad. 4. They had few points of reference. They were isolated in the USSR and were told that conditions were terrible everywhere else, especially in the capitalist world. You only have to read what Lenin and Stalin wrote about the capitalist exploiters. 5. The period after the collapse of the USSR was very turbulent. There was crime. There was inflation. The currency became worthless. Savings became worthless. People lost their jobs. There was unrest. There were wars such as in Chechnya. All in all one can see why some pined for the old USSR. USSR gave them a sense of purpose. It was an ersatz religion. The space programme. The nuclear weapons. The defilades with the tanks and ICBMS. All the propaganda. All of that made people nostalgic and positive toward those years. It's true that Russia was very undedeveloped but so was much of the world. Europe had tremendous strides in literacy and development in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Development, progress and industrialisation would have eventually come to Russia. We saw it come to the west and that prevented communism from taking hold. Populations were growing but the infant mortality rate and life expectancy were significantly HIGHER. The authorities would lie about epidemics even of childhood diseases. Books and media were censored. It was a terrible place and time to live in. Currently populations decline because that happens in developed nations. People simply don't have more kids when things improve and education levels improve. Finally who industrialised the USSR? My great grandparents worked in St Petersburg before the revolution in a factory which built trains. It still functions to this day. The bread in those days had raisins in it. Food was plentiful. The tsars had already started to industrialise. But who industrialised the USSR more completely? The West. People like Henry Ford did. Lend Lease won the war for the Russians. The Russians looted also what they could from more industrial parts of their new empire, such as Poland. You pine for the USSR, but it were the capitalists who made the USSR industrial. The Russians copied so much western tech.
    7
  89. 7
  90. 7
  91. 7
  92. 6
  93. 6
  94. 6
  95. 6
  96. 6
  97. 6
  98. 6
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106. 6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 6
  111. 6
  112. 6
  113. 6
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. 5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 5
  120. 5
  121. 5
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 5
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 5
  136. 5
  137. 5
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 5
  141. 5
  142. 5
  143. 5
  144. 5
  145. 5
  146. 5
  147. 5
  148. 5
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 4
  164. 4
  165.  @unarealtaragionevole  We have evidence that there was contamination because Raymond Rogers wrote that up, he wrote several publications about it several scientific journals. The sample was not representative and was in fact contaminated by the repair process. I think you're nitpicking here. I didn't imply there was laboratory contamination but it was contaminated nevertheless. The object which was under study was the original linen shroud and the image on it and not medieval cotton. The testing itself was not incorrect but the sampling was incorrect ergo the results are likely invalid. Also I don't think the technicians at the time knew about this because it took Rogers and several others some years to write various responses and publish their own findings. So no, the people who published the 1988 findings didn't know. It doesn't matter what Breault thinks, what matters is that the C14 testing was likely not carried out correctly, i.e. not sampled properly. Father Spitzer has stated he suspects there was some skullduggery involved in all of this. I very much doubt this priest with a PhD would openly lie in public, he and others think there was bias against the shroud being from the 1st century. If I remember correctly a reward had even been offered (of 1 million USD) to prove the shroud inauthentic. As for the testing apparently there were problems with the results too in terms of the deviations noted across the laboratories. Likewise the original data was not released for a long time despite requests to have it released. But all of this is moot. In science when we have results which could be contaminated we should redo the test and use true representative samples. Whatever this guy in the video said, and heck this is a touchy subject with people with biases on every side, peoples arguments have to stand on actual merit. As we shouldn't accuse the technologists who ran the original C14 testing of anti-shroud bias, so too we should not accuse this man of bias which would affect the matter of truth of this case.
    4
  166. 4
  167. 4
  168. 4
  169. 4
  170. 4
  171. 4
  172. 4
  173. 4
  174. 4
  175. 4
  176. 4
  177. 4
  178. 4
  179. 4
  180. 4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. 4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208. 4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 4
  214. 4
  215. 4
  216. 4
  217. 4
  218. 4
  219. 4
  220. 4
  221. 4
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359.  @adriansheldon7778  After WW2 which destroyed Europe and Asia and America was the only industrial power left over the Americans took Western Europeans under their wing. We in Eastern Europe had to be under Stalin. The Americans REBUILT Western Europe and offered the same to Eastern Europe but Russia said NO. Then we had the Cold War. During the Cold War an event called the Berlin Blockade occurred. The Americans risked their lives to provide relief. After that the Americans sent 400K+ soldiers to Europe and these guys spent their working careers in Europe. Protecting Europe. They also sent troops to fight in Korea and Vietnam. They pulled out of Vietnam but they stayed in Korea till today and defend it. They rebuilt Japan and Germany and turned them into No 3 and 4 world economies. Stable. The Japanese currently no longer worry about war and can focus on school girl idols and the Germans turned to David Hasselhoff. They also defended Taiwan and they also provide aid to 10s of countries around the world. When they defeated the USSR they allowed us to enter NATO. After the USSR defeat the Western Europeans demiltarised and focused on the social state and later the green deal. To achieve the green deal the Germans turned to cheap Russian gas. Putin wanted more influence in Europe and China also wants to be top dog so they turned on the US. The Germans were happy to do business with both however because most Western Europeans are not grateful to America. Now the Yanks (and they've asked this since GWB) want more European NATO payments and Europeans said no. We bribe Russia said the Jerries and opened up more anti-EU deals with Russia = Nordstream. We're now here. Now America is the baddie because Germany wants to have the green deal and socialism for all including migrants and cheap deals with Putin.
    2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420.  @muralk3153  Believe it or not but I've lived many years on this earth and I've met many Japanese people and they are average people. I've also lived in a communist system, a capitalist European system, an apartheid system, a modern EU based capitalist system and a post apartheid system. Anyway, what you say is the standard response. I can understand homogeneity. But some points. Japanese people are not different to other people. They are not a different species. Everyone gets uncomfortable around strangers. This is a common human trait. There is nothing special about it. Nobody expects ALL Japanese people to have to interact with foreign tourists. There are some people in the hospitality industry, retail and tourist industries who will have to interact with foreigners in a limited way. I did not claim all Japanese people are rich. But the country of Japan is filthy rich. This is on the back of European and US and other people becoming poorer because we closed our factories to buy Japanese products. Japanese tourists used to and still visit foreign locations. People there don't produce TV documentaries and put up NO JAPANESE signs. As for spotlessness of Japan. It's not true that other countries are messy. People don't come to Japan to see clean streets but to see Mt Fuji, temples, eat food, buy gadgets or mementos, see geishas, see samurai, etc. They don't come for the clean streets. I think some people and you are giving Japanese people too much charity. On the one hand Japanese people have clean streets and are taught to carry their own rubbish, but they are also unable to ignore foreign tourists who bring in money. I don't understand this. This is a sophist tactic, where Japanese make themselves incompetent in some areas and super capable in others. They then excuse their hypocrisy. That yes it's OK for Japan to steal jobs from the West and it's ok for Japanese tourists to come to Europe - because for as dirty as we Europeans are it's Japan which copies us and not we copying Japan. So all in all I think Japanese people just have to be modern. 1. Not everyone expects them to speak with foreigners. Anyone with basic education will know this. Japan is highly educated. 2. Tourists bring in revenue. Japanese also travel abroad. They are just as much a nuisance for us but we tolerate Japanese tourists. I've shown my town to Japanese people. They enjoyed it. I don't expect random Japanese to show me theirs but I do expect that there are no "NO FOREIGNER" signs and that TV stations don't produce bigoted TV shows. Japanese people are educated and as humans should be able to adapt to some tourists in tourist spots. All places had to do that. Do you think residents of Rome, Paris, NY, etc are happy with Japanese tourists? Or should they kiss them because European and US cities are a little bit less clean? Japanese people DO NOT GET A SPECIAL PASS from me. They would if they were a poor underdeveloped country, but they are well educated, rich and highly developed. This isn't the 1850s anymore. Let's mot make fools out of Japanese people. They are competent and need to live up to the standard. Besides the Japanese government encourages tourism. Blame them. Don't blame tourists. Thank you. Have a good Sunday or Monday.
    2
  421.  @muralk3153  I'm not American. Unfortunately my people did not steal any land, well not for > 2000 years at least. And if you want to play the game of early human settlement then what happened to the prehistoric people of Japan and how well do Ainu fare in Japan? Point was that Japan was rich because we (West) opened our markets to Japan while the Americans actually built Japan. Americans did not have their civilians mass R=ed and killed by Japanese in WW2. They nuked Japan over Pearl Harbor, a military target. That was a war crime and a terrible sin. But anyway, that's beside the point. I brought up the loss of jobs because Japan owes a lot to the West. Now that Japan is a little bit, a tiny bit poorer that it was, built on the backs of our local job losses in the West and transfer of tech in the 19th and early 20th centuries,, there seems to be an ANTI-TOURIST sentiment perpetuated by some media, some establishments and so on. And you bring in clean streets as though people should be worshiping Japanese people and people like me don't know what clean streets are. You even arrogantly said that people can take something home -- to do with clean streets? What exactly? Japan can teach 'dirty' foreigners cleanliness? I think you overstepped your boundaries there. Japanese do cause a nuisance abroad. Busses full of tourists taking pictures even of people and private places. Asking people to buy stuff for them at Luis Vuitton in Paris and going into private people's homes in the UK to take pics. That's what some Japanese tourists did in the 80s and 90s. But guess what, these people maybe came once in their lives and wanted to get what they could never to return. There was a stereotype of the typical Japanese tourist. But we didn't hate them. Japanese people should not be cleaning any litter abroad. That's not their job. Also when there are travelers from afar one should be accommodating and tolerant. Maybe install more trash cans in tourist spots. That's what we do in Europe and elsewhere. That's a virtue. We respect people who saved money, sat for 20 hours on a plane and then in a strange land have 1-2 weeks to see as much as they can before leaving and leaving their money behind and generating soft power for Japan. Japanese people always like Europe and the West - they love Chopin, Mozart, our dress, our art, our cuisine, our tech, our history, but not us when we visit. That's what gets me. I've already said that I don't know what sort of tourists the PLA will be but if people want to not be friendly to tourists including Western ones then maybe they need to be with North Korea. (As for littering, my family and I, never liter. I always throw rubbish away or carry it with me in any country I'm in. That's not a uniquely Japanese thing. What will Japan teach me?) Have a good day.
    2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425.  @emippe226  America built Japan. The modern world was basically invented in the West, it started with the British. But the foundations of the modern world are largely Western and Japan got all of that for free. India did not get it. China did not get it. Japan got it for free. Japan was feudal, agreed to ally with the Western powers and got the tech transfer. What did they do to deserve any of that? Did Japan have gold? Diamonds? Nope. Then came WW2. Japan decided it needed to enslave Asia to become what they are now. They lost. They were treated very amicably. Of course America bombed them terribly, Americans also bombed the Germans and later Iraqis. But America then assured security for Japan and allowed Japan to have access to resources and Western markets. Slowly Western brands like GE and Philips and Blaupunkt died out and Japanese took over. Then when it became too much Americans made some changes to this agreement which put some natural limits on Japan. After all the modern world is run mostly by the US, they assure the security of the global trade. Russians and Chinese are challenging that now. Russia is a war monger but China is doing things peacefully. But people need to know that much of Japanese tech is Western in origin. Even Toto Washlets are originally American. The original patent was in the US and Toto purchased it to get Japanese people to ditch squat toilets. Just think 30 years ago squat toilets were still a thing in Japan. Maybe even later than that. I don't have hate for Japan but some people there have hubris. That's not good. Tourists should be tolerated. If not, then just have an entry visa regime but the that will destroy Japan's image and Japan relies on her image for sales. Japanese people hate tourists but tourists are there because their government wants them there. Tourists mean soft power. With a rising China and an endless supply of resources China can get from Russia and weakening USA, can Japan really afford to lose their softpower? I only want Japanese to be more like Americans and Europeans and other people who are more tolerant of tourists. I'm not even saying they need immigrants, just tourists.
    2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428.  @muralk3153  When you say best public toilets, can you provide a scientific peer reviewed study to prove this. Because as a scientist I have no idea how you would judge a best toilet. I find toilets all over the world to be very good, well it depends but many if not most are more than acceptable. As for the washlets I know Japanese people who refrain from using the public ones. Because Italians and Spanish haven't had NO FOREIGNER signs for decades even when tourism is low and did not have TV stations which blame foreigners. They also don't employ mayors who blame foreigners even when the foreigners are less than 1% of the population as Tokyo had. Because these countries where applicable also apologised properly for WW2 and did not raise protests and force action when monuments to Japanese atrocities are erected in non Japanese cities. Bali is a beach setting. I have no problems with the authorities fining individuals for bad behaviour. I have problems scapegoating all tourists and creating prejudice against all visitors. If someone behaves badly there is the police to manage them. What do you mean the West has done far more damage? How long did Japan occupy China/Korea? About 10 years or so. What did they do in Nanking and other places? The Japanese even executed German (their allies) civilians. Mark Felton has a film about that. A sign saying NO FOREIGNERS allowed and your explanation illustrates. One is Japanese people pretending to be incompetent, and the other reason is racism. Again prejudice against all people is WRONG. Why do you support this. It's not modern and developed. If you can't speak other languages, put a sign saying, ONLY JAPANESE LANGUAGE SPOKEN HERE, COME WITH YOUR OWN INTERPRETER. What if a foreigner speaks Japanese? Or has an interpreter? Or uses AI on their phone which is pretty good these days? Come on. This is 2024 and not 1850 when Japanese people saw these strange men for the first time. (I know they met other Europeans earlier). I am criticiall of many Japanese because they are developed. Please don't say rational people because that implies that other people are not rational. That's implicit racism already. Please try to see the nuance here. Japan on the one hand you claim is made up of rational people, but people who put NO FOREIGNER signs in their establishments. Really? Is that rational? No, that's just bigoted. And in fact wicked if the person who put such a sign was rational. What do you mean those who condemn Japan for the past of WW2 are indulging in the same today? What does this mean? I'm against wars of aggression. I support Ukraine and NATO in helping Ukraine resist Russian aggression. I haven't gone into a town with a sword to have a head cutting competition. Anyway if you love your Japan you will want them to get their act in order. If they don't want tourism they have to be equal to all visitors, local and foreign. If they want fewer foreigners impose restrictions on tourist visas. I don't mind that. Japan however is reluctant to do this because it creates a negative view of their country and hospitality. Look how Japanese are welcomed in Europe, Brazil and US. No issues. But Japan does not reciprocate. Does not even try. It's quite sad. Have a good day.
    2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432.  @muralk3153  1. You gave your anecdotal speech, I provided my anecdotal speech. What is your point? You made a blanket statement, I never made one. You're creating a strawman. You said Japanese toilets are the cleanest in the world based on your own views. I said you did not give proof of the claim. I then told you what two of my friends say and that is as WOMEN they don't use the feminine wash on public washlets. I don't know if it's just irrational or maybe they've encountered UTIs from this or maybe they and their circle or other Japanese don't. I never bothered to ask them. By the way are you a man or a woman? It may explain your lack of understanding of female hygiene issues. The washlet was patented in the US. You can read the wikipedia article about it. Toto bought the patent. You can read Wikipedia about it. Why do you say I have negative bias? Why must I, a well educated, multilingual, WHITE guy have to experience racism for there to be racism? Why is it about me? There are NO FOREIGNER signs in Japan. That's racist on its own. You said that maybe the proprietors had a negative experience with foreigners. So that means ALL foreigners are bad by default? Dude that's the conclusion of your reasoning. I'm not sure what giving aid, means. Most countries give aid. So are you saying that Japan can buy the right to allow some of their people to have xenophobic attitudes? That makes no sense. Come on. Where did I say Japan as a country was arrogant. Some Japanese obviously are arrogant if they prejudiced against foreigners. I know people who married Japanese and had those Japanese families totally estrange the person who married the foreigner. Is that acceptable behaviour? Have a good day.
    2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483.  @MowMowProductions You live in a democracy. You elect your president. You elect congressmen and senators. Maybe not always directly. You're quibbling over minor details. You don't live in a monarchy, say a hereditary monarchy or an elective monarchy governed by a constitution. You don't live in a one party totalitarian state. You don't live in an authoritarian state either. So yes, you do live in a democracy, simply put: Democracy is often said to mean 'rule by the people'. An example of this is any system of government in which people vote their elected representatives into parliament. MowMow, the US isn't the only republic, for instance the Republic of South Africa, under the apartheid system and now is similar to the US system as is the Republic of Poland or the Republic of South Korea etc. But the important thing is that whether you elect a president directly or via an electoral college, your president and the ruling party, represent you and want your support, they want your vote. In the UK they have a House of Lords which is a part of their congress which is not elected and is there for life, while The Commons is that part which is like the US House of Representatives. The US is a democracy of a republican type as opposed to say a democracy where a monarch is elected by the House of Representatives (parliament). You have three brances, the legislative, the executive and judicial. Now contrast that with say North Korea where there is a dictatorship of a totalitarian nature. Those people have to obey their leader. Americans elect their presidents and representatives and these when it comes to elections vie for votes eg Democrats want Latino votes, while Republicans will want more traditional white male voters.You're not unique. Greeks had democracy and had republics too.
    2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. Well no Jahara. Not that everyone did not like democracy, many did not like the baggage which comes with that which is extra-democratic. Mere elections and people voting based on their own culture is fine but when you impose your own values and you force through geopolitical and economic benefits for yourself, that draws opposition. And your organisations do undermine local people. For example the US owned news network, TVN24 has been campaigning relentlessly against the democratically elected but conservative (it's an unforgivable sin for you) largely Catholic (an even worse sin) government run by PiS (Law and Justice) in Poland. American NGOs also did their best to undermine those. In Hungary Western and American NGOs do their best to undermine Orban and that country's democratically elected government. Because democracy isn't really what many Americans are after but it's a colonial like mindset of changing the world, of colonialism, of crusades and later Puritanism. So if the Russians and Chinese consider your soft power and your organisations a Fifth Column, that makes sense. You are in fact undermining them because you're imposing your own Anglo-Saxon culture and also your own economically driven effects on them. You want Poles for example to be diverse. Because you put gay men in prison, and Poland did not, because you colonised and exploited non whites, and Poland (and Hungary) did not, we must become strictly like you. And of course you will gain favours for your own businesses. When Poland complained about TVN24 interfering in Polish poliitics suddenly American ambassadors from right wing (under Trump) to the current guy (who can't even speak Polish) you threatened Poland and you said Poland may have no free media. What a joke. All of this undermines genuine work. Genuine work in that most Ukrainians want to be free of the Russian yoke and good for them but because you are not without sin yourselves and you refuse to change, you are doing everyone a disservice.
    2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587.  @seanniemeyer5437  This was mostly under the Duda/Morawiecki government of PiS, the government which is so hated by EU elites. We must understand one thing. Ukraine was saved by Polish conservatives. PiS (Law and Justice) don't like Russia. They were re-arming since they got into power in 2015. PiS was also the one which tried to convince GWB to put in an antiballistic missile shield in Poland. When Tusk took over he dragged his feet and the current ABM shield in Poland is weaker. When PIS took over again in 2015 they went crazy with weapons purchases. Previously Tusk (PO) was scaling down the military. Now the kicker, if PO was in charge in Poland in February 2022, the Polish borders would probably have been closed to Ukrainian women and kids and most aid would consist of first aid kits, kevlar vests and helmets. That's it. Note also that it was Kaczynski and Morawiecki who were the first leaders to visit Kyiv in 2022 and speak to Zelensky. Nobody else dared to do this. PO have already dropped the ball since taking over. PIS was buiding something the US NATO generals recommended, the CPK, Central Communications Hub, a real airport, highway and train hub which NATO planners have said was an excellent idea because it would help bring in NATO forces to any Russian attack and provide logistic support. Guess what, PO is already dragging their feet over this. They often say, we don't need a real airport, we have Frankfurt and Berlin. I know you guys in the West think 'conservative= Pro Putin" but that's not the Polish right. Polish left is more into appeasement. The Polish right is very anti-Russian. And you'll also see the other right parties in Europe and Russ bots not promote PIS at all. They will promote French and German right but not the Polish right. So be weary.
    2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. @@Araknos66 According to data from the OECD and EU, Poland has lower sexual harrassment and violent crime figures than those countries. So Poles do commit crime but Poland is one of the safest countries, safer than Germany, France, Sweden when it comes to sex crimes and homicide and terrorism than those other countries where immigrants and their second generations struggle to assimilate. So Poles do commit less serious crime than Western Europeans. Meanwhile the crime rates in those refugee countries are even higher than Western Europe. It makes no sense to bring in random people from those countries. What should be done is that those countries need to be fixed, Europe needs to pay back for colonialism and interference and unfair business tactics, and only skilled people who want to come to Poland and can get work should be allowed in. That's what PIS was already doing. Have a good day. There is no need to be ashamed of anything, after all one more terrorist attack is one attack too many. There are many Muslim extremists who have a grudge against the West, it may or may not be a justified grudge, but Poland's not involved here. The French oppressed Algeria and Morocco and still abuse the offspring of the people they brought from those countries. Why should Poles who are less used to foreigners be put in situations where conflict can occur? It makes no sense. Try to think of the big picture and not Poland alone. Colonialism is the problem and BRICS countries know this and in the next decade there will be calls for reparations from the Global South. That's not Poland's problem, that's the problem of Germany, Belgium, Spain, Netherlands, UK, Italy etc.
    1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696.  @Alejojojo6  What are you on about? Why do you prove that you can't reason? You use ad hominem. That's a logical fallacy. It makes no sense to divide Europe like that because the Iron Curtain was a recent development, it was imposed by Russia against West (the West did not want it i.e. the US and Britain did not want it) and it was not wanted by Poles either. Secondly the Iron Curtain is OVER. It makes no sense to arbitrarily decide to use the Iron Curtain when for the past 1,000 years Poland was CATHOLIC, LATIN and was Christianised/Crowned by the Pope in Rome i.e. the head of the Western Church and the head of the Western civilisation. No it did not culturally shape Europe because Poles like Brzezinski and now Kaczynski or Duda or anyone else are not Russian or Orthodox or communist in their outlook. Poles were always Western. Poles Kosciszko and Pulaski are like Americans. Poland is a British like country and is different to the Germans/Austrians who were authoritarian but Poles like Jefferson were always LIBERAL, liberal in the classic sense. Poland had similar laws to Habeas Corpus and similar laws to the Magna Carta that the British had and the US is based on. It therefore makes NO SENSE to speak of Poland as eastern culturally. Never mind that we are also Catholic, and we are Latin and we look to the West. There are 20million Poles in the US who side with democracy and liberal (classic liberal) ideas on average. So again it makes no sense to call a CATHOLIC country Othrodox, a country which always had liberal and democratic traditions and which had personal liberties and which had Western classic music, Western art, Western architecture and now sides with the rest of the West. It is only because you are Russian you are saying silly things.
    1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758.  @unarealtaragionevole  I never claimed there were lies or deceits. My point is that that the material is contaminated with medieval material. I think you don't like the word contaminate but there's nothing ominous about using that word. There was medieval contamination of the shroud with cotton which had been weaved in. The errors are that the material was CONTAMINATED or was not representative hence the results may be biased by known organic material which differs from the material under study. It's like a crime scene. If you have other peoples' DNA there, you can't claim they are the culprit when you know they had a right to be there because they lived in the house. Now the rebuttals there are that - trust me bro we checked for contamination, we found some and we removed it or, trust me I checked for other fibers weaved in or not and nope they weren't there. But people can make mistakes and later not want to admit or maybe they were just not as thorough. The whole sample was taken from an area which had been handled and fixed and others have come forth to say that there would be cotton there. Now as to why the Church won't allow more testing - here we're going off course. As to how maybe Rogers got religion - we're also going of course. As to why protestant universities and often a naturalistic Richard Dawkins like clique may want to rubbish these results - no, that's not possible. Let's throw all the conspiracy stuff out. Point is that the material was contaminated or NOT REPRESENTATIVE (are you fine with that term) and hence C14 being the only thing which suggests this is medieval, we may have reasonable doubts about it. The Church doesn't claim the shroud is real or not real. They did allow its testing once and maybe they are happy with the medieval result. We can however say the shroud is unique and highly remarkable with many lines of evidence pointing to it being much older and its uncanny how it still eludes mass duplication utilising primitive means as as what the naturalists among us claim this was all along or some one in a billion natural phenomenon of just the right circumstances for a recently deceased body to leave such an image.
    1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. So much wrong here. First the drug user was ultimately responsible for this. Second, did the officer have to drive this fast? Probably not. A drug overdose victim who is conscious and speaking normally can wait a few minutes for the ambulance. It's not the same as maybe an active shooting or a cardiac arrest where someone is dead and needs CPR. These police vehicles are too tough for their job. Why did this car need to be so armoured? What's the NCAP rating of this car? And if you're going to drive these vehicles at speed they should have addition crumple zones because hitting pedestrians will occur sooner or later. The girl who was hit was listening to music. That's very dangerous. Should Apple be sued for this? Maybe. But if people listen to music and it's not illegal, then sooner or later emergency response vehicles will end up colliding with them. So maybe the speed was not appropriate. This may be an outdated policy this police force uses. All in all several things contributed here: Cops car, cops speed, cop's vision of the crossing, the view of the crossing for the pedestrian and the pedestrian listening to music which meant she did not hear the siren as well as she could have and the split second additional warning may have saved her life, the junkie who used the drugs, the response to the junkie and maybe other factors played a role. The cop who said she was a low value person was expressing the realities of what compensation would entail and likely she will not have good lawyers and she's not a brain surgeon or Elon Musk who would generate more in terms of lawsuit payment. It's sad but that's what life's about.
    1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845.  @davidmrenton  David, you're looking at past history here. Japan had a niche. Japan was a primitive society until they started to copy the West. They had nothing of value so they were not simply taken over. Then through luck they partially modernised and then did some stupid things invaded China and Korea. Look at Japanese culture - Nanking was Japanese culture. The Americans then occupied them and rewrote everything for them and repurposed their established state. But everyone else was weak. Half of the world was under communism. Much of the world was not. Look how Japan was made. Japan was protected by the US as a bulwark against the communists (PRC and USSR). Same as West Germany. Markets were opened up to Japan and Germany. Both were protected. Both were allowed to and were guided along the Western capitalist way. The Japanese could not do this alone as they had their war of genocide. Do you know that Japan caused the PRC? Japan weakened the KMT so much that the Reds won in China. We have Japan to blame for the PRC. Anyway PRC now beats Japan in most industries. Look at PRC 20 years ago. They were nothing. Now they are second power in the world, and soon will be No 1. And other nations are also rising. Now Vietnam makes electric cars. Malaysia. Etc. When Japan was rising they were competing against whom? US and West Europe. They were cheaper workers than Europeans but they are not cheaper and better than mainland Asia. Look at the best computer money can buy these days. It's not a Sony Vaio. It's a Macbook. It's assembled in China. Yes US design but assembly quality is superior to Japanese and maybe even European. Japan now has to contend with others catching up. Japan can't compete as how do they compete against India or Indonesia? It's good that China is communist because if China was capitalist it would rule the world. Japan is on its way out. They have to, there is no other way, because the INDUSTRIAL genie is out of the box. The UK is also out. UK still makes money on finacial services but is declining too. The UK heyday is over. It will NEVER be as good and important as it was in the 1800-1930s.
    1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018.  @jamiefroud633  Thanks for that. Japan banned kiddie porn in 1999 and banned onwership in 2014. Amazon Japan would sell movies which were banned in the US/Europe eg Maladosecenza. When you say teen idol industry has been left alone, if you search junior idols on Amazon it's not teens in these magazins, it's preteens. It's 10 year olds. Thanks for your explanation. Now I suppose bad things may happen in Japanese schools and probably way worse things happen all over the world, but the crux is that usually those bad things are in resource poor settings, Japan is the No 3 or 4 RICHEST country in the world. Japanese are filthy rich even though they don't know it. They are educated, they have top universities, academics, etc. They have money for jurists, judges, prosecutors, etc. People are well read. The thing is that despite that people seem to draw morality with legality. But let's face it, most of us, don't need to know that molesting children is illegal for us not to do it. We're inclined not to do it. We are sickened by it and we feel compassion for a child who would face abuse. We also can't stand idly by seeing kids being openly exploited. What I don't get is why Japanese don't seem to feel this. People I know from various cultures would not tolerate child abuse even if the kids were not their own. But so many Japanese simply tolerate it. Scandals in idol agencies are one thing but the usual junior idol swimsuit stuff and these are 10 year olds does not seem to draw scandals. And people seem to be proud of their country that yes, Japan is known for cool tech products and tolerance of pedophilia. Which other culture has euphemisms for pedophiles (lolicons)? I don't want to be nasty but I would not let my underage child out be of my sight if visiting Japan.
    1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027.  @nathanbutcher7720 Well of course Japan didn't care if it appeared racist. Because Japan was in the US camp and became a US outpost and was built by the Americans. It then became a factory for the Americans, something which China has now become on a greater level. Japanese products used to be junk. Later they became better and Taiwan and HK was said to be rubbish, now some Chinese products are said to be rubbish, although the same Chinese are capable of assembling Macbooks which are very good machines, better in quality than Japanese made Vaio PCs. Point is that Japan didn't have to care because Japan was developed. Now the rest of the world is catching up and Japan no longer produces TVs and computers - there is nothing to see in Akihabara. They still produce some advanced electronics but at the rate the others are going they will surpass that. The thing is that with others catching up and becoming rich and Japan becoming more poor, Japanese will be in a weaker position and will not be able to dictate to others and will need others. They will be kissing Indian peoples' behinds when they visit Japan and they'll open up the geishas to them, once they are sufficiently poor. And they will be poor because Japan is a small country with few resources and had enjoyed the relative advanced tech economy based on US hegemony. That's going away. When I say racism, I don't mean the woke racism of America or Europe. I mean the open racism that is resented by mainland Asians, or rather chauvinism. Maybe racism is a wrong word. And those people have long memories. Anglo people don't understand this. Foreigners in Japan may continue to face xenophobia but once Japan becomes sufficiency poor it will change and they may kiss the backsides of foreign Asians or other formerly less developed nations. They won't change because they're woke, they'll change because they'll have to, to have any meaningful economy at all.
    1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062.  @stvn55  Lots of cops use in the EU use smaller vehicles in such situations. I disagree with your assessment. 1. The junkie was not dying. There was no need to speed. Had the junkie been in cardiac arrest, google it mate, then it's 5- 6 minutes before permanent brain damage. There was a potential risk of the junkie arresting and when that happened it would be 5-6 minutes till brain injury. 2. He was speeding too fast. They mentioned 70mi/hr that's highly reckless in a built up partially obstructed setting. Being a cop does not mean you can speed recklessly. Certainly in Europe he'd not be allowed to speed this way if his view was obstructed and why is a cop speeding to a junkie? A junkie needs an ambulance, not a take down and handcuffs. 3. Portable music use is highly common, what's worse is that people even use sound isolating and noise cancelling earphones. So all in all a woman died, the cop is going to have PTSD, her family will be in a bad way and the drug OD made it without the cop. In every decision you have to ask two things. What are the dangers of action and what are the dangers of inaction. All in all the car was too big and driving too fast for an urban environment with many people in it with obstructions and everyone and their dog sporting noise cancelling sound isolating wireless earphones. I called the man a junkie but that's not to disrespect anyone. At the end stupid decisions caused the death of this innocent woman who was listening to music as millions of others do every day.
    1
  1063. 1
  1064.  @Niki_Hydn  Glad your father was OK. Your dad was probably being resuscitated while in arrest which allowed for blood to be pumped to his brain. In this case the caller was not in cardiac arrest. As you know someone in cardiac arrest is unconscious. If they are speaking (they are breathing), they are making sense (the brain is well perfused), they are holding a phone etc... they are probably fine for the next few minutes at least, so there is no reason to go at breakneck speed to them as though they were already without a pulse and unconscious, effectively dead. The thing is that cardiac arrest is only a potential outcome in this case but going at very fast speed through a town full of people is super dangerous and he we saw a woman die and the 911 caller did not even arrest, he was treated by whatever EMS got to him, stabilised and transferred to an emergency department for observation. For me this case makes little sense. A cop could at best offer CPR but an ambulance with EMS can do much more. I don't know if these cops carry AEDs (automatic defib machines) but even so what would a few seconds difference make if an ambulance got to him vs the cop? Unless there were no ambulances at all, but still it would have been better for the 911 operator to keep the caller on the line and despatch the cop and only tell him to floor it if the caller started to collapse. Look this could have been either of us. We could have been out and crossing the street maybe not even listening to music, maybe a little drunk or maybe not even that, and bam out of the blue the cop gets you on the pedestrian crossing because maybe someone out there could arrest and then would need CPR. Thanks.
    1
  1065. 1
  1066. There are Asian men/women/trans people who are attracted to white/black/etc men/women/trans people and so on and on. Many people like this attraction others don't. Just because someone finds someone of a different ethnicity cute or exotic doesn't mean they want to treat them as trash. Sometimes we look at other people and think they are better than our own. When I was younger and I'm white and I lived in an apartheid country, I thought black kids were nicer, I had been bullied by some white kids at school and was called a nerd, and I watched a show made for black kids with a black kid nerd superhero and I saw that his classmates did not bully him and I concluded that black kids are kinder. They don't have this concept of being a nerd or not and so on. We can sometimes look at other groups and admire them. We can also find some Asian girls cute, for me Japanese girls (some) are cute and I know one and she likes me too. I don't however like her because she is Japanese but I've seen through that within a few days of knowing her and for me there is only one girl in the whole world. I just don't find interest in anyone else even though other women of all races can be perhaps objectively more beautiful or cuter, this one person holds a special place in my heart. So not everyone who thinks some beautify feature or some mannerism is cool fetishizes those people. Otherwise what? Should we have apartheid and perpetuate racial seperation? Let's not exaggerate. By the way the castle in question is probably not the best castle in Europe to visit, in your place I'd visit Malbork, in Poland. It's like nothing else. And to see some other German buildings there is also KL Auschwitz one can visit in Poland to see the good and bad sides of Germany.
    1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129.  @sinaiis957  Forgive me but I see an environmentalist agenda here. These people were seen as inferior because of racism but not even that. People of same race have been seen as inferior. To this day people from former Eastern Europe are seen as inferior by those from the rich countries. I think for lack of better use people were seen as animals because what else is there? There are human beings, animals and plants and inanimate objects. Man is the only rational animal. We are special because we think rationally and we are self aware and we make moral judgements. (other) animals don't. But that does not justify cruelty to animals. The sad thing is that here we had experiments on even children and obviously on people who could communicate that they suffered, similar to what the Germans did in the 30s and 40s. As for what's acceptable it is definitely acceptable to experiment on animals for important reasons but not cause them suffering. And it is definitely acceptable to un-alive animals to eat them or use their byproducts but only in the way that does not incur suffering on them. It is only acceptable to un-alive people either in self defense or defense of others against aggression and also try to do it with least pain and also in the case of capital punishment where that is judged to be moral. Both of these fall away in the matter of innocents. It's never permissible to harm innocents on purpose or by intention. The bombings of London, Warsaw, Tokyo, Berlin, Hiroshima were all immoral acts where the civilians were purposefully targeted. If military or factory objects were targeted and civilians unalived incidentally and unavoidably that was permissible. It is never morally acceptable to un-alive or harm an innocent by intent.
    1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. As a Catholic, I can also say that we'd need to hear the entire speech and context here. Because saying all religions are a path to God, does not mean all religions are the correct way to reach God. All religions could be said to be attempts to reach God, well all honest religions, not fake ones created to get money or create armies of servants. But there is a teaching in the Roman Catholic faith or tradition that some of God's nature can be known by reason and that God has created or instilled in us a Sensus divinitatis, which is also found in Calvinism and even Islam. Catholic teaching says that primitive man and later on, even the pagans did have some sort of idea about God and hence there are religions, it's just that we need the Christian Revelation and so the Church to complete this. If we understand the Pope's words in terms of "All roads are an attempt to lead to Rome, but most fail, or perhaps all fail but one" without saying the last bit explicitly, we can understand that the Holy Father is not being heretical here. I would really need to know more context here. And while the Pope should be more prudent with his language because it can lead to different understandings and the idea that he believes in universalism, it may be that it's not the case that he believes that all religions really are the same but it's true that all religions are a way to try to understand God or get to God, (but there is only one correct way to achieve this). For example all methods of audio recording are a way to preserve music for posterity, but we know that wax disks, phono records, magentic tapes and digital media vary in the detail captured. We know also that all philosophical systems are attempts at understanding reality but it's not the case that all are actually correct. We know that there are many ways of interpreting Quantum Theory but it may be that there really is only one correct interpretation. It may that the Pope is just not using the language correctly here and may only mean that all religions are man's attempt to reach God, and he just said it in short-hand which sadly can be interpreted as heresy. This could be the starting point for further dialogue with other faiths. We all want one thing. We're all trying to know God. And God wants us to know Him. Thoughts?
    1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334.  @Lilliathi  Yes we are an animal in the biological sense but we differentiate people from (other) animals and we don't have to be pedantic about it. I don't know if instinct will be there in the background - there is wide breadth of human behaviour and I'm not sure I buy that instinct is ALWAYS there. Maybe it rears its head in times of stress but I'm not sure it's always in the background. And if it is always in the background the way that biological functions are always there - eg the need to eat and drink, it makes any real difference to what TIK is saying. Saying that untaught people maybe will revert to instinctive behaviour does not negate the rational nature of Homo sapiens. Where does this learned behaviour come from, somehow the first people acquired it. And yes even animals need socialising skills, eg monkeys removed from their mothers do worse in social settings. But mankind is so much more. Going with the flow will be easier for instinctive and for fully rational creatures. It's just easier. Economies always follow. If you can earn the same money working less hard, chances are you'll do that. So I'm not sure how this is an issue. It seems totally irrelevant a point. I don't know if capitalism uses human competitive instincts. Some people are competitive, others aren't. Also not sure if competitiveness here isn't acquired through learned behaviour. Also not all capitalism is competitive. Just working hard and/or smart can get you enough to survive and have enough to spend on your hobbies or family. Not everyone is a workaholic and not everyone is greedy and not everyone cares about political ideologies, at least explicitly.
    1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341.  @PJRayment  I don't think I'm wrong. I think that popularity of a religion has little or nothing to do with its truth value. It's not a given, you can't claim, religion has failed because less people follow because all religion is is following the truth of a given teaching or revelation or doctrine. I also don't think we can discount a religion because few people follow it. Discount it from a truth standpoint. Maybe we can discount it from the point of view of influence of its teachings sociologically although even then we can dispute that and say-- (some or many of) the teachings of Christianity are so ingrained in European culture that people take them for granted and take them as obvious default positions. I don't think I'm wrong. I don't think religion has failed because 1. There are 100s of religions. So which religion has failed and how? 2. Some religions have failed. Those which predicted the end of the world etc and it hasn't happened have failed. Christianity hasn't failed - to fail Christianity we'd need to find the bones of Jesus Christ. Christianity unlike all other religions can be proven false empirically. No other can be, be it Buddhism, Shinto, Islam, Judaism, etc. Christianity can be falsified. Anyway I don't think Christianity has failed because 1. We're not at the end of time. 2. Christianity even so, has no targets. As a Christian, it's not your job to convert 1000 people and if you don't, you've failed as has your priest. It's also not failure to sin or move away. Christ didn't say- you must convert so many millions of people or you've failed. Christianity cannot fail. Christians can fail at some task, sure. But you can't say in a blanket way Christianity has failed. Failed because people prefer hedonism or are too busy? How is that a fault of Christianity? And what is Christianity? Is it God's failure that people don't convert? How is it God's failure that people reject Him? How can we judge this? Anyway I hope you see the OP said something nonsensical. Happy Easter.
    1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421.  @cooterhead_jones  I don't know what a top student is. What's the science? There isn't any. You don't need "top" students. You just need average students who work diligently. This type of nonsensical characterisation of people makes me think you don't really know much about how professional people perform their work. Secondly why do you speak of things you don't know anything about? You posted platitudes here. How old are you and what's your education level? How do you know other kingdoms had higher levels of hubris? How do you know people follow propaganda? Maybe they follow culture? Maybe they follow experience? Maybe they read? So much wrong with what you wrote here. I mean you're trying to sound smart but it's a word salad. What do you mean you have a right to feel superior? How do you feel superior? What do you feel superior about? And how do you feel superior when it's not your achievement? Just to add how do you know the Western world has done it optimally or the best way it could be done? There is no way to know that. Also how do you put value on different aspects of life? Also as a Yank, you have control of the world and you use that to your advantage but you also exploit others, it's not clear they wouldn't have done better without you. This is an example of your own personal hubris in assuming what you have is optimal and best for others while it benefits you as you interfere even in your so called "allies". And why can't it be DNA? I suspect you think that some races are superior. You had to defend that but I suspect there is something in you which suspects that. Dude, US has much hubris because the US is world super power. It's not about healthcare or accountable government. It's about affecting billions of people through bad policy, pride and ignorance. I can't speak for Alexander the Great but it's not as if his successes or failures effected the whole world. Your whole response smells of hubris. Was it written by AI? Or did you come up with those brown nuggets yourself?
    1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430.  @esseaem1451  If you think someone is acting unethically you can report them. If patients say something you can advise them where to report their concerns. If your colleague is saying he won't treat pain either he is saying so in jest - or maybe he is serious in which case speak to his superior or head of the department if you think a patient is in pain and is mismanaged. One need not be accusatory. That's not easy I know. Doctors are not more special than other people. You're young and in your generation it's more about money, I'm a bit older, and for us it was more of a calling even though yes, you'd always find work being in medicine. But these days everything is like this. Doctors again are not special, civil engineers have to design buildings and bridges to specs. Aviation engineers have to design airplane parts. Mechanics have to make sure brakes in cars, planes etc won't fail. For me, I usually give more than I'm expected to and that sometimes has created problems for me, with certain types of colleagues. But medicine is about livelihood too. In this country doctors do years of community service and do more years of community is specialising. I don't know about other countries but the debt to society is repaid even for those who do those USMLEs and run away to the States and those others of us who prefer to stay behind at least for now. What's worse is that work in resource poor settings is way more taxing than in 1st world settings. If you have to struggle to get your patient an echocardiogram and it may take a year to get it, it can be off putting. I booked a g scope for a patient with anemia today, it's for April. My patients with debilitating palpitations will no longer be seen by cardiology opd because they don't have the capacity for that. Either I can capture the offending rhythm (and I attend them for other problems not as primary care, forget about primacy care help, they're even more busy) or they have syncope, otherwise reassurance. There is no colorectal cancer screening programme etc. So frustrations are there. Thanks.
    1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595.  @abrakkehakka1357  China also does not have an expansionist agenda. Let's face it, the US has the Monroe Doctrine, but all China wants is to secure the seas around it even less so than the West has security of its oceans. No the Japanese undercut US and Western European labour. There was significant anti-Japanese sentiment in the US and Reagan finally had to tell the Japanese to back off. Literally everyone was worried Japan would own America and people were definitely not happy. The only reason the Americans are upset with the Chinese is that the Chinese have learned to produce things on their own and now compete with the West. The West thought with disdain that Chinese were simple people but China has the world's largest average IQ. In the long run the West can't win against China. They are too smart and there's too many of them. Now I don't like communism. But have to call it how I see it. All was ok with China as long as they were not too big, they could massacre protesters and so on, occupy Tibet etc. but once they started to produce too many products - now China is bad. Capitalist principles. So working 6 days per week and child labour are capitalist? It's not undercutting salaries and subisizing by having a shortened life expectancy and high pollution rates? Well China always had those. So China was fine in the 80s, 90s, 2000s, but now China is bad...? Really. You need to step outside your US bubble. I like America but I'm Catholic and we have to call it how it is. Expansionism? China is the worlds, oldest country. They're more or less the same size now as 3000 years ago.
    1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612.  @mariaavalon3730  I don't know where you get your ideas but you can find lists of these similar resurrected messiahs and you will find NONE are the same as Christ. Superficially there are some similarities but you have to remember that in terms of what people can do there are only a number of limited things which can happen. A deity can only do so many things. So superficially similar things occurring does not make them identical nor the evidence for them nor our evidence for knowing such a thing occurred supposedly. I don't know which historians or athropologists you speak about but the Bible is BIG. It has a NT and OT. In terms of the NT the Bible actually teaches history because previously historians had no idea that Pontius Pilate even existed until some years ago a stone with his name was found. I understand you have some emotional need to think Christianity is zero and you think it's all bunk because you're young and you probably cannot fathom out how people survived in the 90s without GPS or smartphones. You also have no idea how much evidence there is for major historical figures of the past. For example there is more evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ than there is for Alexander the Great or even Julius Caesar. When it comes to religion there is a sociological idea that the sciences are independent of religious belief. Science texts will not go and speak of religious teachings because it would be politically incorrect to do this, or offensive or blasphemous and so on. When it comes to Christianity it is very well documented. We have writings about the early Church and early traditions which are documented, we have archeological evidence, for example the tomb of St Peter was discovered under the Vatican some years ago. Look on YT for this video: "Jesus was NOT copied from pagan mythology (Zeitgeist REBUTTED)" because the guy goes over the different ersatz Christs amateurs bring up.
    1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. This video and Takashii starts with a xenophobic and racist premise. He says FOREIGNERS, but there are things other Japanese should also not do. Secondly this is not a foreigner problem, Takashi, I know you think foreigners are inferior per se, but it's a problem of education and culture. America is a rich country. Japan is also a rich country. Your two countries are closely connected and Yanks go on and on about America and for Japanese every European person has to be American or maybe a German, likely everyone else for average Japanese does not exist or is trash. That's because typical Japanese are also poorly educated. Poorly educated Americans visit Japan and are their confident loud mouthed selves. The Japanese whose government sucks Uncle Sam's finger and encourages tourism and needs the US defense against China, (previously the USSR) wants more tourism. Well tourists sometimes misbehave. What does this mean? They may behave as they do at home. And given America is rich, and Japan is America's darling, rowdy and relatively uneducated but wealthy people visit Japan and act in a boorish way. The well educated ones, usually work hard or have a wider choice of countries to visit, it's not all about weeb culture, or lolicon rubbish, or anime or ninja rubbish but they have the whole world they can visit and less time to do it and they behave. So in summary this issue is not so much with foreigners Mr Takashii but is an issue with poorly educated but wealthy foreigners, chiefly Americans. So all in all, you should say VISITOR BE EDUCATED. And I'm sorry but if one does behave the same as one does in any other country and that is politely and Japanese people still don't like one, that's just on the Japanese people. Maybe they should stop exporting garbage to our countries and stop their government from promoting tourism.
    1
  1687.  @Caballaria-sc2sj  The West has no sphere of influence in the Pacific. The point is that Taiwan is China's sphere of influence. I don't know how you can be so irrational. If Mearsheimer does not want Ukraine with the West he must not want Taiwan with the West either. The two are linked directly. Taiwan and Japan, like it or not, are closer to China. And China is the second (recently first) most populous country in the world and is an ancient empire, it is the oldest continues country in the history of the world. It's as old as Egypt but still continues to this day. Taiwan is not in the Western sphere of influence. You may as well say Ukraine is in the Western sphere of influence because de facto Russia has had little influence on Ukraine since their puppet fled after Maidan. Man - think for 5 minutes. You are using a logical fallacy called special pleading. You are saying this is different for arbitrary reasons. But Taiwanese are Chinese, and Formosa was part of China, like it or not. If US wants to keep Taiwan Western it has to keep Ukraine Western too otherwise Mearsheimer is as per usual being irrational and cherry picking/special pleading his arguments. The man does not reason rationally. He is a sophist. You know very well that the US does not fully recognise Taiwan. You do know that Taiwan's place in the UN P5 has been taken away and given to the PRC. Most countries follow the one China policy. The United States' One-China policy was first stated in the Shanghai Communiqué of 1972: "the United States acknowledges that Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China.
    1
  1688.  @Caballaria-sc2sj  Back when Chang Kai Shek left for Formosa China did not have the capability to invade him. But China always said that is part of their country. And America in fact agreed - which you keep on ignoring. America is interfering in China's back yard. America has no rights to that part of the Pacific. It would be as if China or Russia started to make demands on the western hemisphere. I don't really know why you create arbitrary distinctions between 'long established' and recently established. China had no power to reclaim Taiwan back in the day but now will have this power increasingly so. Ultimately if we follow the trajectory, China will be the No 1 superpower in the world. They have more people, a higher average IQ than the US and have easy access to Russian resources. On the other hand Ukraine has been pro-Western too for many years. Their people have voiced their opinion that they want to be part of the West. Russia is a declining power while the PRC is ascending. The Chinese are now having the means to enforce their demands while Russia failed in her influence on Ukraine. Ukraine is fighting Russia and is denying Russia's supposed sphere of influence. I think Mearsheimer is a sophist and a hack. He is only repeating that what's good for the US is what's correct and is ignoring the same issues in Ukraine. But it's not good for the US or Japan to start a war with China, a war they will likely lose because Japan is an effeminate society spoiled by wealth and America is too far away and overstretched in the Middle East, South America, Europe and all over East Asia. I know what you want to say but you're trying to pidgeon hole reality into particular categories which suit your model. The reality is that: Taiwan was always considered a part of China by even the US. Many Chinese there would not even mind returning. China is now becoming stronger and will become even stronger in the future. Taiwan is probably the most important issue for them after taking back Hong Kong. For America, Taiwan is a CPU factory. That's all. There is not the need to keep Taiwan. Now in Europe I would argue that Europe out of Russian hands is key to the well being of America. We Europeans are closer culturally to Americans than Koreans or Japanese or Chinese people on Taiwan. Also we are physically closer. And sort of often form one sort of bloc. America will lose Europe if she refuses to support Ukraine against Russian aggression and thus far America is able to weaken Russia using Ukrainian peoples' own blood. And they are willing to shed it. So unlike Afghanistan and Iraq, the Ukrainians feels Western and one day will make for good allies the way Poles are good allies now. As for Taiwan, if it can deter aggression, that's great, but overall in the long term America will definitely lose against China over there as Americans are not as desperate to keep Taiwan. Remember America lost in Vietnam and lost in Afghanistan and that was against weaker enemies when the tech difference was larger back then when it is now. It's sheer hubris to believe otherwise.
    1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1